PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Pana Health and Rehab Center has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice among nursing homes. With a state ranking of #173 out of 665 and a county ranking of #1 out of 4 in Christian County, it is in the top half of facilities in Illinois. The facility is improving, with reported issues decreasing from 5 in 2023 to 4 in 2024. However, staffing is a significant weakness, rated only 1 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 32%, which is better than the state average. There have been no fines reported, and the center has less RN coverage than 84% of other facilities in Illinois, potentially impacting the quality of care. Specific incidents included ongoing issues with cold food being served and the failure to remove outdated TB solution from a medication refrigerator, posing a risk to residents. There were also concerns about not following dietary guidelines for residents on therapeutic diets, which could affect their nutrition. While Pana Health and Rehab Center has strengths in its overall rating and compliance with health inspections, these deficiencies highlight areas needing attention for resident safety and care quality.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Illinois
- #173/665
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 32% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (32%)
16 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
14pts below Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Apr 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to follow their policy by not providing written documentation of a bed hold notice for 1 of 1 residents (R76) reviewed for hospitalizations, i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure a resident on blood thinning medication was examined for pot...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to follow their Contact/Droplet Precautions Policy while administering medications to 1 of 3 residents (R34) reviewed for Transmi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that out dated Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (TB) solution was removed from the 300 hallway medication refrig...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure resident menus and appropriate serving sizes were followed for 4 of 8 (R3, R5, R6, R7) reviewed for therapeutic diets ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination and the spread of infection for 3 of 9 residents (R21, R45, R35) reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform complete incontinent care for 2 of 6 residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly administered and/or s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing is dated when placed for weekly ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a restraint assessment including the risk versus benefits of a seat belt with alarm for 1 of 2 residents (R24) review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection for 3 of 5 (R5, R39, R47) residents reviewed for and infection c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR's) and put resident centered b...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to provide food at a palatable temperatures during meal service. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents in the facility....
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 32% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Pana Health And Rehab Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Pana Health And Rehab Center Staffed?
CMS rates PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 32%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Pana Health And Rehab Center?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 13 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Pana Health And Rehab Center?
PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SUMMIT HEALTHCARE CONSULTING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 128 certified beds and approximately 107 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in PANA, Illinois.
How Does Pana Health And Rehab Center Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (32%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pana Health And Rehab Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Pana Health And Rehab Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Pana Health And Rehab Center Stick Around?
PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 32%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Pana Health And Rehab Center Ever Fined?
PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Pana Health And Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?
PANA HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.