GOOD SAMARITAN HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Good Samaritan Home in Quincy, Illinois has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average compared to other facilities, sitting in the middle of the pack. It ranks #37 out of 665 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 6 in Adams County, indicating only one local option is better. The facility is improving, with the number of issues decreasing from 7 in 2024 to 2 in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, rated 5 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 32%, which is much lower than the state average of 46%. However, the facility has faced some serious concerns, including critical failures in infection control that led to a COVID-19 outbreak and a serious incident involving a resident with dementia who eloped from the facility and was found outside after a lack of proper supervision. While there are notable strengths, such as excellent staffing ratings, these incidents highlight significant areas needing improvement.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Illinois
- #37/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 32% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $26,640 in fines. Higher than 50% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 59 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (32%)
16 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
14pts below Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided timely provider notifications to ens...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 2 (R1 and R3...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Requirements
(Tag F0622)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation by a physician regarding the basis of a resident's involuntary discharge with indications for why a resident should n...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident, resident's representative, and the Ombudsman in writing of the reasons for discharge for one of three residents (R1) r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to a resident and a resident's representative upon transfer to the hospital for one of three residents (R1) revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R81's current electronic Medical Record documents R81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following, but not limi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R81's current electronic Medical Record documents R81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following, but not limi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely during a shower to avoid falling for one of five residents (R45) reviewed for falls in the sample ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use the Heat Stickers to ensure dishes reach the correct/required surface temperature when in the rinse cycle in the dish mac...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of potential verbal abuse to the administrator and the State Agency for one of three residents (R2) review...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond immediately to a sounding exit door alarm, failed to adequately supervise a known wandering resident (R8), failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident for an underlying condition prior t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
4 deficiencies
1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a Physician ordered diet to one of three residents (R72) reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 60.
Findings include:
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer and administer all required boosters for the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) vaccinations to maintain...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) action plan to address symptomatic staff to resident COVID-19 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 32% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $26,640 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 16 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $26,640 in fines. Higher than 94% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade C (51/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Good Samaritan Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns GOOD SAMARITAN HOME an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Good Samaritan Home Staffed?
CMS rates GOOD SAMARITAN HOME's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 32%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Good Samaritan Home?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at GOOD SAMARITAN HOME during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 13 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Good Samaritan Home?
GOOD SAMARITAN HOME is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 203 certified beds and approximately 100 residents (about 49% occupancy), it is a large facility located in QUINCY, Illinois.
How Does Good Samaritan Home Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, GOOD SAMARITAN HOME's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (32%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Good Samaritan Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Good Samaritan Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, GOOD SAMARITAN HOME has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Good Samaritan Home Stick Around?
GOOD SAMARITAN HOME has a staff turnover rate of 32%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Good Samaritan Home Ever Fined?
GOOD SAMARITAN HOME has been fined $26,640 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Illinois average of $33,345. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Good Samaritan Home on Any Federal Watch List?
GOOD SAMARITAN HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.