RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Rushville Nursing & Rehab Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and a poor overall rating for the facility. Ranking #399 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois places it in the bottom half, although it is the only option in Schuyler County. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 6 in 2024 to 11 in 2025. Staffing is a weakness here, rated at 1 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 51%, which is average compared to the state. Additionally, the facility has recorded $45,279 in fines, which is concerning, and while RN coverage is average, it is important to note that there have been serious incidents, such as a resident suffering a femur fracture due to improper use of a gait belt and another developing unstageable pressure ulcers from inadequate skin assessments. Overall, families should be aware of both the facility's serious deficiencies and its average staffing and RN coverage when considering care options.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Illinois
- #399/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $45,279 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 43 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 26 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Illinois average (2.5)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 26 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to initiate appropriate fall interventions for one of four Residents (R6) reviewed for falls in a sample of six.Findings include:The Facility F...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2025
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with respect for one resident (R46) of 18 residents reviewed for respect and dignity in a to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0605
(Tag F0605)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure chemical restraints were not utilized for one ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after a significant change in condition for one resident (R12) of one reviewed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheters were placed securely off the floor in a sanitary manner for two (R41 and R119) of six resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing is changed weekly and ear pads are used for residents wearing oxygen for two (R25 and R119) of two reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. The current Physician Order Sheet for R119, documents a 4/1/25 physician order for Risperdal 0.25 mg (milligrams) daily at 8:...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Hospice's coordinated communication and required documen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food stays warm for six residents (R11, R12, R26, R47, R50, and R119) of six residents reviewed in a total sample of 33....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify, monitor, and review prophylactic antibiotic use for four o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
2. The current Care Plan for R41 documents R41 requires Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to indwelling urinary catheter and interventions including: Follow facility's Infection Control and Enhanced Ba...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to utilize a gait belt during ambulation, for one residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was accessible within a resident's reach for 1 of 24 residents (R9) reviewed for accommodation of needs in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to provide lower extremity Range of Motion programing to a resident with limited joint mobility and a diagnosis of Foot Drop for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to safely transfer 1 resident (R27) of 6 residents reviewed for transfe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document justification for the use of duplicative antidepressant therapy for one of five residents (R1) reviewed for psychotropic medicatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to observe ingestion of medication for one resident (R3) during observation of a routine medication pass.
Findings Include:
The ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
6 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement pressure relieving interventions and perform...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise a smoking care plan for one (R31) of 18 residents reviewed for care planning in the sample of 27.
Findings include:
Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. On 05/22/23 at 10:10 AM, R26 was sitting up in her wheelchair in her room sleeping.
On 05/23/23 at 03:03 PM, R26 was sitting...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0808
(Tag F0808)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve physician ordered supplements for three of six residents (R3, R12, R39) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 27.
Fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to consistently offer substitutes at mealtimes. This failure has the potential to affect all 56 residents who reside in the facili...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store dry goods in a clean and sanitary manner. This failure has the potential to affect all 56 residents who currently reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified as a fall risk was wearing proper foot...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on Interview and Record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed by a licensed nurse after falling inside of a moving vehicle for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for ac...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s), $45,279 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 26 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $45,279 in fines. Higher than 94% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (30/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 26 deficiencies at RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 23 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr?
RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ATIED ASSOCIATES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 96 certified beds and approximately 68 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in RUSHVILLE, Illinois.
How Does Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr Stick Around?
RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr Ever Fined?
RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR has been fined $45,279 across 1 penalty action. The Illinois average is $33,532. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
RUSHVILLE NURSING & REHAB CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.