AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Avenues at Quad Cities has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's care and management. With a state rank of #454 out of 665 in Illinois, they are in the bottom half of facilities, and #5 out of 9 in Rock Island County, meaning only four local options are worse. However, the facility is showing improvement, reducing issues from 17 in 2024 to 3 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, far below the Illinois average, which suggests that staff remain consistent and familiar with residents' needs. On the downside, there were serious incidents, including a resident eloping at night despite known mental health issues and the failure to follow proper discharge protocols, which caused residents emotional distress. While there are some positive aspects, families should be cautious given the facility's overall low ratings and the serious deficiencies reported.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Illinois
- #454/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 28 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Illinois average (2.5)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
The Ugly 28 deficiencies on record
May 2025
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(H)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0627
(Tag F0627)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to obtain Facility Initiated Discharge Physician Orders, follow current...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(H)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to notify Resident/Resident's Representatives of transfers/discharges a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a wandering resident with a kno...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
14 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a copy of the bed hold policy for the resident discharging to the hospital for one of one resident (R6) reviewed for bed hold in a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a new level one PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) for 2 of 3 residents (R13 and R25) reviewed for pre-admission sc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and initiate treatment for a skin fold wound for one resident (R20) of one resident reviewed for skin im...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and process pharmacist drug regimen review recommendations for one (R24) of 12 residents reviewed for drug regimen review in a sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff available to provide nursing services to meet the residents' need in the facility. This has the potenti...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0838
(Tag F0838)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include the Infection Preventionist position or duties in the Facili...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0865
(Tag F0865)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain documentation; and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement prog...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement plans of action to make improvements to residents' quality of care and quality of life in its QAPI/Quality Assurance ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program (IPCP), failed to include an ongoing system of surveillance, and failed to imp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an ongoing facility-wide system to monitor the use of antibiotics and failed to include leadership support and account...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a Certified Infection Preventionist. This failure has the potential to affect all 31 residents in the facility.
Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure documentation in the resident's medical record of the administration or refusal of the Influenza and/or Pneumococcal va...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0945
(Tag F0945)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a surveillance system to identify possible communicable disease or infections, how and when to use Transmission Based Precautions an...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a resident and resident's representative with a written notice of transfer (R6) and the facility failed to notify the facility Ombu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a diabetic resident receiving a nutritional...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to allow a resident the right to exercise the choice to e...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0800
(Tag F0800)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with a nourishing, well balanced diet for one of...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop resident care plans for three (R1, R14, and R17) of 12 residents reviewed for care planning in a total sample of 19.
F...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure one resident (R1) was free from misappropriation of funds of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures regarding hand hygiene ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to reconcile controlled medications for one of 13 residents (R21) reviewed for medications in the sample of 19.
FINDINGS INCLUDE...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to place a resident in the required transmission-based pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse eight hours a day, seven days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 29 residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0886
(Tag F0886)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform the required twice weekly COVID-19 testing on staff members who are currently not up to date with the COVID-19 vaccination. This fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff members were fully vaccinated for COVID-19. This failure has the potential to affect all 29 residents residing in the faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 3 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 28 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • Grade F (13/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Avenues At Quad Cities's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Avenues At Quad Cities Staffed?
CMS rates AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Avenues At Quad Cities?
State health inspectors documented 28 deficiencies at AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 3 that caused actual resident harm, 23 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Avenues At Quad Cities?
AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 63 certified beds and approximately 19 residents (about 30% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SILVIS, Illinois.
How Does Avenues At Quad Cities Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5 and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Avenues At Quad Cities?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Avenues At Quad Cities Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Avenues At Quad Cities Stick Around?
AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Avenues At Quad Cities Ever Fined?
AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Avenues At Quad Cities on Any Federal Watch List?
AVENUES AT QUAD CITIES is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.