SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Silvis Center for Nursing Rehab & Care has a trust grade of D, which indicates below-average performance and some concerns about the quality of care. Ranking #403 out of 665 facilities in Illinois places them in the bottom half, while they are #4 of 9 in Rock Island County, meaning only three local options are better. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 7 in 2024 to 9 in 2025. Staffing is a concern, as they received 1 out of 5 stars for staffing, but they have a low turnover rate of 0%, which is significantly better than the state average of 46%. Although there have been no fines, two serious incidents were noted, including a failure to monitor a resident's weight properly, resulting in hospitalization, and a failure to provide a necessary BiPAP machine, leading to respiratory failure. Additionally, there were issues with recording resident council meeting minutes, which could affect all residents by not addressing their concerns.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Illinois
- #403/665
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 34 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Illinois average (2.5)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 21 deficiencies on record
May 2025
3 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure daily weights were completed as ordered for a r...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with an order for a BiPAP (Bilevel P...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to provide dependent reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident privacy was protected by not closing the door, during nursing care, for one resident (R262) of 16 residents (R5, R8, R18, R2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to reweigh a resident after a significant change for one resident (R8) of three residents reviewed for weight change in a total sample of 29.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction of a psychotropic medication for one resident (R39) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to only allow residents in the resident council meeting, failed to record attendance at resident council meeting minutes, failed to identify re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely to 5 of 5 residents (R1-...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were responded to in a timely manner for 8 of 8 residents (R1, R2, R3, R8, R9, R10, R12 and R13) reviewed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate hospital discharge cervical neck brace and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have all doors alarmed at all times. This failure has the potential to affect all residents who wander (R1, R25, R33, R34, R39, R48 and R54)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
4) R48's Physician Order Sheet dated May 2024 documents a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder current episode manic without psychotic features, depressive episodes, anxiety disorder and schizoaffective diso...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. On 5/22/24 at 1:30 PM V8, CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) performed catheter care on R27 while she was lying in bed. V8 did not change her gloves and/or perform any hand hygiene after catheter care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide/have the Medical Director attend (QA) Quality Assurance meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 72 Residents who resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist, who is responsible for assessing, developing, implementing, monitoring, and managing the Infection Prev...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided to four residents (R1, R3, R5, and R6) of six residents reviewed for weekly showers, in a total sample of six....
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to protect a resident from misappropriation of narcotic pain medicatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to administer a scheduled narcotic pain medication to a newly admitted...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care for two of two residents (R36 and R58) reviewed for wound care in a sample of 28.
Find...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medical indication and consistent adverse behaviors were documented to warrant the use of an antipsychotic medication...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0808
(Tag F0808)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a physician-ordered special diet for one of one resident (R41) reviewed for special diets in a sample of 28.
Findings...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 21 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade D (40/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care Staffed?
CMS rates SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care?
State health inspectors documented 21 deficiencies at SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 19 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care?
SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by WESLEYLIFE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 102 certified beds and approximately 64 residents (about 63% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in SILVIS, Illinois.
How Does Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.5 and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care Stick Around?
SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care Ever Fined?
SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Silvis Center For Nursing Rehab & Care on Any Federal Watch List?
SILVIS CENTER FOR NURSING REHAB & CARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.