HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB

512 NORTH 11TH STREET, VIENNA, IL 62995 (618) 658-2951
Non profit - Church related 50 Beds WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
36/100
#251 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Hillview Senior Living & Rehab has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. They rank #251 out of 665 in Illinois, which places them in the top half of facilities statewide, and they are the only nursing home in Johnson County. Although the facility is improving, having reduced issues from 7 in 2023 to 0 in 2024, the overall situation remains worrisome due to a history of serious deficiencies, including critical failures that resulted in a resident's death from a gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Staffing is a significant weakness, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars, although they report a 0% turnover rate, suggesting that staff may stick around despite the issues. Additionally, fines totaling $98,504 are concerning and indicate ongoing compliance problems, while the facility's RN coverage is only average, meaning they may not have enough registered nurses to catch potential issues early.

Trust Score
F
36/100
In Illinois
#251/665
Top 37%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
○ Average
$98,504 in fines. Higher than 61% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 30 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 7 issues
2024: 0 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Illinois average (2.5)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Federal Fines: $98,504

Well above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
Aug 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of changes in a resident's weight for one resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of changes in a resident's weight for one resident of 4 residents (R31) reviewed for physician notification in a sample of 22. Findings Include: R31's Face Sheet documents R31 is an [AGE] year-old female resident with an admittance date of 10/10/17. R31's Face Sheet documents diagnosis including: Cerebrovascular disease, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, Edema, Arthropathy, Essential hypertension, Dysphagia, Acute upper respiratory infection, Iron Deficiency anemia, and Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia. R31's Physician Order Sheet documents an order for Metformin tablet 1000 mg (milligrams) twice a day with a start date of 04/04/2021 and a discontinued date of 04/26/23. R31's Physician Order Sheet documents an order for Torsemide tablet 10 mg, for a diagnosis of fluid retention, one time per day with a start date of 12/29/2021 and a discontinued date of 04/26/23. R31's Physician Order Sheet documents an order for Torsemide tablet 20 mg, for a diagnosis of fluid retention, one time per day with a start date of 12/29/2021 and a discontinued date of 04/26/23. R31's progress notes document on 04/27/23 at 11:08 AM, V8 (Medical Director) was at the facility doing rounds on 04/26/23, V8 discontinued R31's order for Metformin, Torsemide and Colace and initiated daily weights for 5 days to monitor fluid retention, no swelling noted at this time. The facility document dated 04/27/23 - 08/16/23 titled, Vitals Report documents: on 04/27/23 at 6:59 PM R31's weight was 113.8 pounds and on 04/28/23 at 1:48 PM 116.6 pounds. On 05/01/23 at 1:37 PM R31 had a weight of 115.6 pounds. On 05/08/23 at 9:36 AM R31 had a weight of 120.4 pounds. On 08/16/23 at 1:12 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated the order from V8 (Medical Director) was to monitor R31's weight for 5 days. V2 stated he would have no expectation to monitor any longer than what V8 ordered. When V2 was asked if V8 was notified of the weight gain R31 had between 4/27 and 4/28 V2 stated, no. V2 said the order stated to only monitor. When V2 was asked if V8 was notified of the 7 pound weight gain in the week of 5/1 to 5/8 V2 stated they (the facility) did not notify the doctor because that would be outside the parameters V8 specified. On 08/17/23 at 1:45 PM, V8 (Medical Director) stated, he discontinued R31's metformin and Torsemide because she was dehydrated and was not eating well. He was wanting her to gain some weight. He ask for them to monitor her weight for 5 days for fluid retention, but did not set any parameters because R31 was a smaller lady. V8 would not state whether he would expect them to notify him or not of the 2.8-pound weight gain the next day or the 7 pound weight gain 11 days later.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure restorative programs were implemented for 1 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure restorative programs were implemented for 1 of 8 (R25) residents reviewed for restorative care in the sample of 22. Findings Include: R25's Face Sheet with a print date of 8/17/23 documents R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Stage 3 pressure ulcer left hip, spondylosis, osteoarthrosis of spine, dementia, mood disturbance, and cognitive communication deficit. R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R25 has a severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS documents under Section G, R25 is totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. R25's Care Plan dated 6/28/23 documents a problem area with a start date of 4/8/23, Category: ADL's (activities of daily living) Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential Res (resident) needs PROM (passive range of motion) Restorative Program r/t (related to) at risk for developing an impairment in functional joint ability R/T recent decline in ADL's self-performance abilities, weakness, Decreased Mobility, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Dementia, Contracture BUE/BLE (bilateral upper extremity/bilateral lower extremity). The interventions with approach dates of 4/8/23, documented for this same problem area include, .Assist to move through tol (tolerated) range, supporting joints above et (and) below all major joints BID (twice daily) x (times) 7 days per week Evaluate and tx (treat) discomfort as needed . Gradually decrease assistance as tol to encourage progress to AAROM (active assisted range of motion) .Refer res (R25) to therapy as needed Report any declines in ROM abilities Reposition res (R25) for comfort at end of session . R25's Physician Order Report dated 8/1/23 to 8/17/23, documents the following physician order with a start date of 4/8/23, PROM (passive range of motion) to all major joints BID (twice daily) 7 days/wk (week) as tolerated . R25's Point of Care Restorative Nursing Category Report dated 8/17/23 documents no restorative programs were documented as administered for the following dates, 7/11-7/15, 7/17- 7/24, 7/26, 7/28- 7/30, 8/2-8/16/23. The report documents passive range of motion was provided for five minutes on 7/16, 7/25, 7/27, and 8/1/23 and for 15 minutes on 7/31/23. On 8/16/23 at 4:23 PM, R25 was observed while V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was administering treatments to the pressure ulcer located on R25's left hip. During this observation, R25 did not independently move his lower extremities. R25's legs were contracted at the knees with approximately a few inches of movement. V2 (Director of Nurses) who was present for this observation stated, R25 had the contractures when he was admitted to the facility. On 08/17/23 at 9:43 AM, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was observed assisting R25 with passive range of motion. V2 (DON) was present during this observation. V11 was assisting R25 with upper extremity passive range of motion when V2 asked this surveyor if there was anything specific I was wanting to see. This surveyor explained I needed to see the restorative programs but also needed to see the restorative programs for R25's lower extremities. V2 stated R25 has been that way since he was admitted to the facility and R25 grimaces when they do lower extremity restoratives so they don't really do them. This surveyor asked V11 (CNA) if she did any restoratives with R25's lower extremities during activities of daily living. V11 stated she did with R25's upper extremities but R25 didn't really move his lower extremities. When asked how she assisted R25 with putting his pants on, V11 stated she was able to get R25's legs apart far enough to slide his pants on. Throughout this observation, R25 was lying in bed with his legs partially drawn up, with the left leg on top of the right leg. This is the same position R25 was observed in during the observation on 8/16/23 at 4:23 PM. The facility Restorative Nursing Programs policy dated 2021 documents, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level 2. Nursing personnel are trained on basic, or maintenance nursing care that does not requires the use of a qualified therapist or licensed nurse oversight. This training may include but is not limited to: a. Maintaining proper positioning and body alignment. b. Encouraging and assisting residents, as needed, in turning and position changes. c. Encouraging residents to remain active and assisting with any exercises according to the plan of care .f. Assisting residents with range of motion exercises, performing passive range of motion for residents who lack active range of motion ability .4. All residents will receive maintenance nursing services as described above, as needed, by certified nursing assistants. 5. The Restorative Nurse and restorative aides receive additional training on restorative nursing program activities upon hire and as needed .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to ensure staff provided urinary catheter care and perfor...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to ensure staff provided urinary catheter care and performed hand hygiene per current standards of practice for 2 of 3 (R23 and R28) residents reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 22. Findings Include: 1. R23's Face Sheet with a print date of 08/17/23 documents R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include orchiectomy, congestive heart failure, acute kidney failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), urinary retention, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and history of urinary tract infection. R23's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/9/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 09, which indicates R23 has a moderate cognitive deficit. R23's current Care Plan dated 4/18/23 documents a problem area with a start date of 12/10/2019 of, Category: Indwelling Catheter, (R23) requires an indwelling urinary catheter R/T (related to) DX (diagnosis) of Urinary Retention, Neurogenic Bladder, Bladder Spasms, Obstructive Uropathy, et (and) BPH. The interventions (Approaches) documented for this problem area include; provide catheter care every shift and as needed, report urinary tract infection signs/symptoms, administer medications as ordered, store collection bag inside protective dignity pouch, and use a catheter strap. On 08/16/23 at 2:52 PM, V10 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed providing catheter care to R23, with V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) present for the observation. V10 donned gloves and used a no rinse wipe to clean R23's groin area. V10 used a clean wipe to wipe around the tip of R25's penis near the catheter insertion site. V10 did not pull R25's foreskin back and clean under/around the foreskin. V10 used a clean wipe to wipe down the catheter tube from the insertion site. V10 wiped up and down the catheter tubing three to four times, wiping to and from the insertion site. V10 doffed her gloves and donned clean gloves and used a dry washcloth to dry the areas. V10 doffed her gloves and donned clean gloves and covered V10 up with a clean sheet. V10 did not hand sanitize between glove changes. At 2:58 PM on this same date, V10 stated she normally would use hand sanitizer between glove changes but she was nervous and forgot. On 08/16/23 at 2:59 PM, when asked if he observed V10 cleaning the catheter tube to and from the insertion site, V2 (DON) stated, Well, you are supposed to go from the insertion site down, but she cleaned the tube so that is all I have to say. 2. R28's Resident Face Sheet with a print date of 8/17/23 documents R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease, heart disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. R28's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 07, which indicates R28 has a severe cognitive deficit. R28's Care Plan dated 6/27/23 documents a Problem area with a start date of 6/8/23 of, Res (R28) admitted from hospital with an indwelling urinary catheter R/T (related to) Hospice Care, decline in health condition et (and) ADL's (activities of daily living) self-performance, weakness, decreased mobility. This problem area documents interventions that include avoid lying (R28) on top of tubing, avoid obstructions in the drainage, change catheter bag every week and as needed, change catheter every month and as needed, position bag below the level of the bladder, report signs/symptoms of UTI (urinary tract infection), and provide catheter care every shift and as needed. On 08/16/23 at 3:50 PM, V7 (CNA) was observed providing catheter care to R28 with V2 (DON) present. V7 used no rinse wipes to clean down both sides of R28's groin then used a clean wipe to wipe around the foreskin that was covering the head of the penis, without pulling the foreskin back to clean the head of the penis. V7 then used a clean wipe to wipe down the catheter tubing. When asked if that was the way she would normally clean the penis, V7 didn't respond. When asked if she should have pulled the foreskin back and cleaned the head of the penis, V7 stated she should have done that. V7 then pulled the foreskin back and cleaned the head of the penis with a clean wipe. The facility Hand Hygiene policy dated 2022 documents, Policy: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility Additional Considerations: a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately after removing gloves The facility Catheter Care policy dated 2021 documents, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. Policy explanation: 1. Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel Male: 14. Gently grasp penis, draw foreskin back if applicable. 15. Using circular motion, cleanse the meatus with a clean cloth moistened with water and perineal cleaner (soap)/non-rinse cleansing cloth. 16. With a new cloth, starting at the urinary meatus moving down, cleanse the shaft of the penis. 17. With a new cloth, starting at the urinary meatus moving outward, wipe the catheter making sure to hold the catheter in place so as not to pull on the catheter. 18. Dry area with towel
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0563 (Tag F0563)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to allow freedom of visitation at any time. This has the potential to affect all 22 residents residing at the facility. Findings i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to allow freedom of visitation at any time. This has the potential to affect all 22 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 08/14/23 sign posted on the entrance door stating, visiting hours 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM with no visitation during lunch 12:00 -1:00 PM. The resident admission packet includes a document titled, Resident Rules and Regulations documents: Visiting Hours: Regular visiting hours for the facility have been established and posted. The facility reserves the right to limit any or all visitors. Relatives or guardians and clergy, if requested by the resident or family, will be allowed to see critically ill residents at any time in keeping with the orders of the physician. Visitation outside of posted visiting hours may be arranged with prior notification to the facility administrator or Social Services Designee. On 08/17/23 at 11:20 AM, V9 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated they discourage visitation during lunch (12:00 PM - 1:00 PM) and dinner (at 5:30 PM). V9 stated, there is a sign on the door that states the visiting hours. If the visitor really wanted to visit during those hours, she guesses arrangements could be made. On 08/17/23 at 11:23 AM, V11 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated there is a sign on the door that states the visiting hours are between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM with no visitation between 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM. On 08/15/23 at 11:20 AM during the resident council meeting, R1, R9, R15, R27, and R29 stated, visitors are not supposed to come in and eat with them, there is a sign on the door that states the visiting hours are between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM with no visitation between 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM. On 08/17/23 at 2:10 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated people are allowed to visit whenever the sign on the front door with visiting hours says on it. The nurses put the sign back up after the new Covid-19 protocol V1 didn't notice it. V1 does not know why the nurse stated they discourage visitation during lunch or meals. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents Form dated 08/14/23 documents there are currently 22 residents residing at the facility.
May 2023 3 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident from neglect when they failed to recognize a sign...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident from neglect when they failed to recognize a significant decline in condition and accurately assess, treat, and seek progressive emergent treatment in a timely manner for 1 (R1) of 6 residents reviewed for neglect in a sample of 6. These failures resulted in R1 being transferred to a local hospital on 4/12/23, and R1's subsequent death from cardiopulmonary arrest due to or as a consequence of probable gastrointestinal hemorrhage. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 4/12/23, when the facility failed to recognize a significant decline in condition and seek timely emergent medical treatment. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 04/28/23 at 12:35 PM. This surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 05/02/23, but non-compliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. Findings include: R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 11/14/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertensive heart disease, dementia, weakness, ataxic gait, muscle weakness, cellulitis of right lower limb, Vitamin D deficiency, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. R1's 2/17/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R1's Care Plan dated 11/21/19 includes - Problem Start Date: 05/20/2022. Category: Psychosocial Well-Being. Resident chooses to be a Do Not Resuscitate. Long Term Goal Target Date: 05/18/2023. Resident will inform staff of changes to advance directive. Approach Start Date: 05/20/2022. Code status available for facility staff members. Will follow resident wish and will not attempt to resuscitate. Will review quarterly, annually or with significant change MDS's. Problem Start Date: 11/21/2019. Category: ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential. Res (resident) has Dx (diagnoses) of COPD, CHF, et HTN (and hypertension). Long Term Goal Target Date: 05/18/23. Resident will maintain vital signs within normal limits, perform activities of daily living, and participate in desired activities without evidence of fatigue and/or weakness, breath sounds clear, vital signs within acceptable range, stable weight, no edema. Approach Start Date of 11/21/19 includes: Maintain a sitting/semi-Fowler_positioning, 1:1 (one on one) relaxation techniques, breathing exercises, redirection, O2 (oxygen) , Nebs (nebulizer), Inhalers etc. (other similar things) .as needed during episodes of severe shortness of breath .Monitor and report signs of respiratory distress: (restlessness, wheezing, dyspnea, difficulty with expectoration, diaphoresis, crackles, bubbling, tachycardia, cyanosis, decreased breath sounds) .Monitor for tachycardia, dyspnea, sweating, pale skin color with activity, E.g. (example given); walking, dressing, bathing .Obtain Diagnostic Tests/Labs per MD (medical doctor) orders et (and) notify of abnormalities . R1's record includes a progress note dated 04/11/2023 at 6:36 PM by V10 (Registered Nurse - RN) that documents, Resident noted to have 104 temp (temperature) axillary. PRN (as needed) Tylenol given suppository. NP (V2 - Advanced Practice Registered Nurse/APRN and Director of Nursing/DON) notified. Awaiting further orders. R1's Progress Note dated 04/11/2023 at 9:17 PM by V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) documents, Resident resting per recliner. Temp is now 101.2. LCTA Resp E/U (lungs clear to auscultation respirations even/ unlabored). Resident is very slow to respond when spoken to, she keeps her head down while sitting in recliner. Resp are at 32. SPO2 94% (oxygen saturation, percent). R1's record under Vital Signs on 04/11/23 at 9:26 PM/9:27 PM by V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) are recorded as: Blood pressure: 91/52, Respirations: 32 (alert triangle with exclamation mark noted), Pulse: 77, and O2 Sat (oxygen saturation): 94%. R1's Progress Note dated 04/12/2023 at 2:31 AM by V7 documents, Resident (R1) had a large loose stool in recliner, on the floor and on resident from head to toe. Both hands coated slathered on fronts of thighs and in her hair. Resident was transferred to w/c (wheelchair) and to shower. Residents temp 100.9, Resp 20, Pulse 64 and regular and SPO2 94%. WCTM (will continue to monitor). Right leg remains bright red and warm to touch. R1's Progress Note dated 04/13/2023 at 6:59 AM by V7 documents, When resident had large loose BM at 2:30 AM 4/12/2023 the stool was thin with undigested food particles noted. Color was an orange, brown color with no noted frank or occult blood. R1's Progress Note dated 04/12/2023 at 2:40 AM by V7 documents, Resident did not speak to staff but could follow staff with eyes. Held onto w/c (wheelchair) and shower chair during transfers. Required max (maximum) assist x 2 (2 staff) with gait belt for transfer. R1's record under Vital Signs, on 04/12/23 at 8:24 AM and recorded by V2, document her pain is assessed as 6 out of 10 and at 11:14 AM, her temperature is 100.1. R1's Progress Note dated 04/12/2023 at 9:39 AM by V2 (APRN/DON) documents, Resident in recliner when passing medications that resident was stupor in recliner and labored breathing. Temp of 102.9. Resident is unresponsive to verbal stimuli however is responsive to painful stimuli of sternal rubs and deep nail press. SPO2 88% on RA (room air). LCTA. Unable to arouse to eat breakfast or take medications PO (by mouth). O2 (oxygen) applied at 3L/min PNC (liters/minute per nasal cannula), Tylenol supp (suppository) given for fever. Cool wash cloths applied to forehead and groin region to decrease temp. Resident was moved to bed out of recliner to perform assessment and treatment. Resident noted with redness, swelling and warmth to RLE (right lower extremity). Cellulitis indicated and resident was given 1-gram Rocephin IM (intramuscularly) x 1 now and then will start Keflex 500 mg (milligram) po tid (three times daily) x 10 days. An Event Report Infection Control Tracker form completed by V2 documents the finding of R1's RLE cellulitis and includes Event Date: 04/12/23 9:26 AM . Classification: Infection Type: Cellulitis/Soft Tissue/Wound. Surveillance Definition Met? McGreers Criteria obv (observation) performed? Yes. Reportable Infection? No. History: Symptoms: Fever, RLE erythema and swelling. Onset Date: 04/12/23. Device Type: No device .Diagnostics (microbiology, other labs, radiology): Diagnostics Performed: No . Treatment: Select which provider ordered testing and treatment: (V2). Order Origin: Nursing Home. Indicate Antibiotic used. If no Antibiotic used, type N/A (not applicable): 04/12/23: Rocephin 1 gram (IM) x 1 now. 04/13/23: Keflex 500 mg po tid x 10 days .Other Information: Was an Event/Observation performed for the related infection? If no, reason needs explained: Yes. Transmission-based Precautions? None. Re-cultured/Assessment Date (if applicable). If yes, indicate date re-tested. NA. Any new orders from re-assessment/culture? If so, indicate new order. NA. Select which provider ordered testing and treatment. (V2) .Additional Information: RLE Cellulitis. Notifications: Attending Faxed: No. Physician Notified: No. Resident Representative Notified: No. Care Plan Reviewed: No. Vitals: Blank. The remainder of this form contains the orders and notes as documented above. R1's record under Vital Signs, on 04/12/23 at 11:14 AM, recorded by V2, documents R1's temperature is 100.1. There were no further recordings of vital signs or documentation of an assessment of R1 in R1's medical record until 04/12/23 at 3:26 PM as documented below. R1's Progress Note dated 04/12/2023 at 3:26 PM by V2 (APRN/DON) documents POA (Power of Attorney/ V3) came to visit resident. Updated POA on current medical condition of resident. Assessed resident while POA in room and noted that resident was in acute respiratory distress. Resident currently on 3L/min PNC, temp is 102.6 prn (as needed). Tylenol supp given at this time. O2 increase to 4L/min. RLE noted to have erythema and swelling and warm to touch, anterior portion erythema has decreased slightly, posterior area unchanged. Mottling noted up to mid-thigh on BLE (bilateral lower extremities). Spoke to POA about changes in condition and explained that sepsis or AKI (acute kidney injury) could be the cause. Resident remains unresponsive to verbal stimuli only has mild responsiveness to sternal rubs. POA states that she would like resident to be evaluated at (name of hospital) however if she has a major issue that she more than likely will not want to do anything. POA chose (name of hospital) to be sent to for evaluation. (Ambulance company) notified and arrived and transferred resident to (hospital). Report was given to V12 (Physician) in the ER (Emergency Room). R1's Prehospital Care Report Summary form from the ambulance company dated 04/12/23 documents that Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived at the facility at 2:57 PM after a 911 call from the facility and that R1 was found unresponsive lying-in bed guppy breathing. Staff stated PT (patient/ R1) respirations had been this way all day and they also noticed that PT has cellulitis to the right leg from the ankle to the knee . and Skin looked normal but on the back side of arms and both legs noticed PT looked like her blood was pooling. The form further states Upon arrival at ED (Emergency Department), PT respirations became worse and while cot into room PT went apneic. Ventilations initiated per ED staff. On 4/27/23 at 12:24 PM, V6 (Paramedic) stated he arrived at the facility on 4/12/23 and found R1 to be lying in bed guppy breathing and unresponsive. V6 said facility staff told him R1 had been guppy breathing like this on and off all day. V6 stated just by the way (R1) was breathing I knew she was not going to last long. V6 said the back side of R1's arms and legs had dark discoloration which looked like blood was pooling, like how blood pools in the skin at the lowest point after a person expires. V6 said R1 stopped breathing as they were going through the ED doors. R1's progress note dated 04/12/2023 at 6:05 PM by V2 documents, Received phone call from V12 (Physician) at (hospital ER). MD (Medical Doctor) states that resident arrived at ER and coded. Attempted to intubate and noticed resident had aspirated on blood. MD states that resident had a massive GI (gastrointestinal) bleed and was DNI (do not intubate) and DNR (do not resuscitate) and resident expired in ER. V4 (Medical Director), V1 (Administrator) aware. V3 at facility when resident expired. R1's hospital ED Physician Documentation dated 4/12/23 at 3:38 PM by V12 documents Patient (R1) was brought in by (ambulance company) with no spontaneous respirations, but an irregular heartbeat. (R1) is DNR/ DNI. (R1) was evidencing black emesis from the mouth and she was full in both lungs of black fluid that appeared to be from a GI bleed. R1 expired fully at 3:49 PM today (4/12/23). R1's Death Certificate documents date of death was 04/12/23. The Cause of Death documents: a. Cardiopulmonary Arrest, due to (or as a consequence of) b. Probable Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. On 4/27/23 at 9:26 AM, V3 (POA) confirmed R1 was not receiving services of hospice or comfort care measures. V3 said she had never told the facility she did not want R1 sent to the hospital if it was medically needed. V3 said R1 was a 'Do Not Resuscitate' but V3 still expected the facility to treat R1. V3 said R1 was alert and oriented on 4/9/23. R1's State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Public Health - IDPH Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form documents in Section A Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), If patient has no pulse and is not breathing, the option of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR) is selected. Section B Medical Interventions, if patient is found with a pulse and/or is breathing the option of Comfort-Focused Treatment is selected and defined as follows: Primary goal of maximizing comfort. Relieve pain and suffering through the use of medication by any route as needed; use oxygen, suctioning and manual treatment of airway obstruction. Do not use treatments listed in Full and Selective Treatment unless consistent with comfort goal. Request transfer to hospital only if comfort needs cannot be met in current location. V3 signed R1's POLST form as her Legal Representative and V2 (APRN/DON) signed as the Authorized Practitioner and both dated 11/14/19. On 4/27/23 at 10:31 AM, V2 (APRN/DON) said he assessed R1 on 4/12/23 in the morning and found R1 was unresponsive and was transferred from the recliner to bed. V2 said R1 was febrile and V2 ordered a Tylenol suppository, Rocephin, and Keflex. V2 said R1 was mainly unresponsive most of the day. V2 said R1's oxygen saturation dropping was not normal for R1 and oxygen was applied. V2 said he did not contact V3 (POA) because V3 had the facility number blocked so R1 could not call V3 during the night. V2 said the facility would text V3 if they needed to report any change in condition. V2 said he did not attempt to contact V3 in any way because V2 did not think R1's change in condition was serious enough to contact V3. V2 said when V3 arrived at the facility, V2 updated V3 on R1's change in condition. V2 said he asked V3 if they wanted R1 to be transferred to the hospital or if they wanted R1 to stay in the facility and keep R1 comfortable. V2 said V3 chose to send R1 to the hospital. V2 said R1 was not under hospice services and was not on comfort care. When V2 was asked if R1 being so unresponsive that R1 could not take medications by mouth and had to have a Tylenol suppository was concerning, V2 said the fever was concerning, that is why I was treating her. On 05/02/23 at 10:25 AM, a follow-up interview was conducted with V3 (POA). V3 was asked to recount and confirm the events on 04/12/23 regarding R1. V3 stated she was there that day because the grandkids had sent some pictures and she wanted to put them in frames and do some decorating in R1's room. V3 added that the whole family had just been in the facility on Easter Sunday (04/09/23) and ate dinner together with R1. V3 stated, My brother and everyone got to see her, so everyone saw her in great condition and she was able to visit. She was perfectly cognitive that Sunday. V3 continued that when she arrived in the facility on the afternoon of 04/12/23, V2 caught her up on what had been happening with R1 from the night before and wanted to prepare her. When this surveyor asked what that meant, V3 stated she was not sure exactly what he meant. V3 stated V2 told her it had been a couple of hours since he had last checked on R1 so they both had gone to her room at that time. V3 stated she felt blindsided. V3 said that R1 was not in her regular room, but in another room across the hall. V3 stated she observed R1 lying flat in a bed with no oxygen on her nose, nor did she observe any oxygen in the room. V3 stated, I don't know how long (R1) had been lying in bed, but (V2) just said the night before she had run a fever, was still running a fever that day, and had been given a shot and antibiotic. (R1) did not have a bed in her regular room because she sleeps in a recliner because of her COPD. She had slept in a chair forever. (R1) was observed to be non-responsive, so V2 tried doing a sternal rub. (R1) did not respond. V2 looked at R1's legs and he saw the mottling in her lower legs and told me 'that concerned him'. V3 stated that V2 told her, It just has me baffled. I don't know what more to do because most of her vital signs were good. V3 stated that it was not clear to V2 what he was dealing with, and at that point V3 said, I think we need to send her to the hospital and that maybe it was something an IV could take care of. If it was not something the ER could stabilize, I would have gone from there and discussed comfort care if nothing else would have worked at that time. When asked if she had spoken to the hospital yet, she (V3) stated, Not really, I was told she had passed in the ambulance. She had thrown up some black tarry vomit and had a major gastric bleed. The ER doctor did tell me that. A few years ago, she (R1) was in another hospital for a gastric bleed. That was another thing that raised questions for me because she had COPD and a history of gastric bleed, and I didn't receive a phone call from anyone in the facility prior to me walking in on 04/12/23. When asked if V3 had any of her phone numbers blocked so the facility would be unable to contact her, V3 stated, I did not have my phone off and my phone number is not blocked to receive calls from the facility. A lot of times I may not hear the ringer or may not have my phone on me but if I had missed a call, I'd have seen that and would have called back immediately. I have missed calls before and I always return their call. I have phone records to show there were no missed calls from the facility on 04/11/23 or 04/12/23. When asked about receiving texts, V3 stated she had received texts in the past from V2. On 4/27/23 at 9:50 AM, V4 (Medical Director/Physician) said if a resident was found to be febrile, unresponsive to verbal stimuli, and have labored breathing with an oxygen saturation in the 80's he expected the facility would contact V4. V4 said if it is a serious problem the resident should be transferred to the hospital. V4 said he expected the facility to notify a resident's POA with any change in condition. V4 said it is possible if R1 was transferred to the hospital six hours earlier, when symptom onset began, R1 may not have expired. On 04/28/23 at 3:24 PM, V4 was contacted for a second interview. V4 stated that a resident's condition certainly changes, and they should be taken care of appropriately. Sometimes the patient and the family change their mind or direction they are going when they sign the POLST originally, but there should be a clear understanding from the patient and family of what treatment they want. When asked if DNR meant do not treat, V4 confirmed it means, Do Not Resuscitate, adding the patient should always be taken care of regarding their symptoms or whatever is happening. When asked if on 04/12/23, the emergency room could have provided any further or different treatment than R1 had already been provided at the facility, V4 stated when you go to the hospital, they do everything so they can find out what is going on. An additional document with the State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Public Health seal titled Illinois Statutory Short Form Power of Attorney for Health Care documents that R1 wants (V3) to be her health care agent. The form further documents, I authorize my agent to with the box checked Make decisions for me starting now and continue after I am no longer able to make them for myself. While I am still able to make my own decisions, I can still do so if I want to. Under Life-Sustaining Treatments documents, in part . In general, in making decisions concerning life-sustaining treatment, your agent is instructed to consider the relief of suffering, the quality as well as the possible extension of your life, and your previously expressed wishes. Your agent will weigh the burdens versus benefits of proposed treatments in making decisions on your behalf. On 05/02/23 at 3:05 PM, V2 (APRN/DON), V9 (Chief Executive Officer/CEO), and V1 (Administrator) entered the conference room where this surveyor was working. V2 again stated he had not been given the chance to report the events that transpired throughout the day on 04/12/23 regarding R1's condition. V2 was asked if he had any new information he would like to provide at this time. V2 stated when he got to R1's room on 04/12/23 to pass medication at approximately 7:30 AM, she was sitting up in her recliner with her chin down to her chest. V2 stated he did notice she looked uncomfortable at that time stating R1 was stupor and not as alert. V2 stated, I did a sternal rub on her. She did wake up and look at me. Then, I asked her if she was hurting. She did not respond to that. At that point, we moved her from the recliner to the bed in a room across the hall. V2 stated once R1 was in bed her vital signs were checked. R1's oxygen saturation was about 88/89%, so she was placed on oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 liters and the head of her bed was elevated to 45 degrees. V2 stated, While I was in there, I assessed her by listening to her lungs which were clear and I checked her skin. I did see that her right lower extremity had some redness, swelling, and was warm to the touch and she had a fever of 102 degrees. V2 stated at that point he gave R1 a Tylenol suppository and an injection of Rocephin. V2 stated he placed cool wash clothes on her forehead, armpits, and groin and from there made the decision not to give her any oral intake due to the risk of aspiration. V2 stated R1 was peaceful and comfortable at this time. V2 stated that after R1 was settled, he went to the nursing station and continued with nursing duties. He did attempt to call R1's POA (V3) but it only rang once and the call was disconnected. V2 stated normally if she saw we called, she would call back or come in. V2 stated, It could be minutes, hours, or days before you would get a response. V2 stated at 9:30 AM, he checked on R1 again, removed the wash cloths, but did not check her temperature because it would not have given a correct reading. V2 stated R1 had no rapid breathing, nothing appeared abnormal, and R1 displayed no signs or symptoms of pain. V2 stated he did not attempt to wake R1 at that time opting to let her rest. V2 stated that he went back at 11:00 AM, rechecked her temperature and it was 101 degrees. He did try to wake her by speaking to her but she did not wake up. V2 stated he did another sternal rub and R1 did wake up, open her eyes, and groaned slightly. V2 stated R1's lungs were still clear at that time, she had no symptoms of respiratory distress, and her color was good. V2 stated he asked the CNAs if they would attempt to feed her at lunch and they reported back to him that R1 did not eat lunch. V2 stated the CNAs checked on R1 around noon, then V2 went back down around 2:30 PM when V3 showed up to visit R1. V2 stated he assessed R1 with V3 present, and her fever was 102 degrees. V2 stated he administered another Tylenol suppository and explained that R1 had cellulitis that could be causing the fever. V2 stated V3 tried to wake R1 up herself by repeating her name and when she did that, R1 started breathing heavier and more labored than what she had been previously. V2 stated he explained the options of keeping R1 in the facility would be to keep her comfortable, pain free, and without respiratory distress or they could send her to the ER and see if there was anything else that was going on they might be able to fix. V2 stated, V3 asked him what he thought, and he told V3 it was her decision, and that V2 could do either. V2 stated, I could start her on Morphine/Ativan or send her to the hospital. V3 then asked which hospital she should go to. V2 again told V3 that was her decision. V2 stated R1 did not appear critical at that time, so it was up to V3. V2 stated that V3 opted to send R1 to the hospital, claiming that the family would be mad at her if she didn't send R1 to the hospital. V2 stated V3 then said if they find anything serious, she was not going to do anything. V2 then told V3 he would call EMS and have her sent. V2 stated V3 asked him if she had to be there and he again told V3 that it was up to her but he would give report to the ER. V2 stated V3 left at that time, EMS arrived and did not do an in-room assessment - just got report from him. V2 stated, R1 was loaded on the stretcher and was in their hands after that. V2 stated he gave report to V12 in the ER. V12 called back about an hour later and explained to V2 that R1 had passed .that she coded when she came through the ER doors, (V12) attempted to intubate but saw what appeared to be aspiration of blood and assumed she had a massive GI bleed. They witnessed the POLST form DNR and did not proceed with intubation nor any further treatment. On 05/02/23 at 3:30 PM, V9 (Chief Executive Officer/CEO/Social Services) stated V3 came by the next day to get R1's belongings and praised the facility for the care of R1. V9 had with him the IDPH printout titled, Guidance Document for Illinois Health Care Professionals and Providers - Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Uniform Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment and stated he wanted to go over the parts he highlighted. V9 then read from Page 2 of this document - healthcare professionals and institutional providers are legally protected from liability if, in good faith they honor the instructions contained in the POLST form . V9 stated, Which is exactly what we did. V9 stated R1's POLST indicated she was comfort focused treatment. V9 stated, This is the big one, and read the following from the document - Transfer to hospital only if comfort cannot be achieved in the comfort setting . V9 stated, We were going by what was on her POLST .I think we were within our guidelines and it's cut and dry we were following the resident's wishes. V9 read, POLST portable medical orders form, signed by the patient's qualified healthcare practitioner and either the patient or their legal representative, converts the patient's care choices into an actionable medical order that all other physicians, nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, long-term care facilities, hospices, home health agencies, emergency medical services, hospital staff, and other provider staff are required by law to honor . V9 also read, .the POLST model allows individuals to specify the intensity of medical interventions when they experience a life-threatening emergency where they still have a pulse. On 05/02/23 at 3:45 PM, V2 stated he believes the facility did everything as they should have and provided the care and comfort to R1 she required prior to her being transferred to the ER on [DATE]. When asked if V2 had anything else he would like to add to his interview, he stated, I stand beside the treatment R1 received in the facility on 04/11/23 and 04/12/23. If I had to do it over, I would do the same thing. I wouldn't change anything. An email correspondence from V1 (Administrator) dated 5/1/23 at 1:43pm documents that (V2) is a full practice NP (Nurse Practitioner) in response to the question if V2 has a collaborating agreement with a physician or if V2 has a full practice authority license. This email also contained V2's license that documents Full Practice Authority APRN. The facility's 11/12/22 Notification of Changes in Condition policy documented in part . The facility must inform . the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstance requiring notification include: 2. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status . 3. Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment . According to https://www.polstil.org/resources-for-healthcare-providers/, the Guidance Document for Healthcare Professionals documents the following in part . POLST stands for 'Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment.' A POLST form is a signed medical order that travels with the patient to assure that a patient's treatment preferences are honored across settings of care. The POLST form is designed to ensure that seriously ill or frail patients can choose the treatments they want or do not want and that their wishes are documented and honored Use of the POLST form is voluntary. This form contains orders that can be revoked or changed at any time by patients or their legal representative When a patient's condition changes significantly, prior decisions about treatment should be revisited and consideration should be given to completing a new, updated POLST form. On 05/04/23 at 8:23 AM, V15 (LPN) stated prior to R1's fever the evening of 04/11/23, she did not appear to have anything going on. V15 stated, It seemed like it came out of nowhere. It seemed like it happened very quickly. V15 stated R1 would propel through the facility in her wheelchair but did stay in her room quite a bit. She was not able to ambulate or stand/transfer on her own but once she was in the wheelchair she could propel independently where she wanted to go. On 05/04/23 at 9:07 AM, V16 (CNA) and V8 (CNA) both stated normally R1 was awake and alert but sometimes she would get sleepy and tell us she just wanted to sleep. She had a habit of staying up at night sometimes and going through the drawers/packing her things to go home. V16 stated they would have to check the schedule but the last time they worked, R1 was fine. V8 stated the last time she worked and saw R1 was on 04/11/23 between 6:30 AM and 3:00 PM. V8 stated R1 had a shower that day and was tired after and wanted to sleep. V8 stated R1 slept in her recliner. V8 stated she did work the same shift on 04/12/23 but was not really involved with R1's care that day. However, there was nothing observed that would have given an indication R1 needed to be sent out to the hospital. She just knows she was sent out to the hospital and was surprised to hear she passed away. On 05/04/23 at 11:03 AM, V10 (RN) stated she did work on 04/11/23 from 2:30 PM to 7:00 PM. V10 was asked about R1's condition that day. V10 stated, I remember she started running a fever when I was getting ready to leave between 6:15 PM and 6:30 PM that evening. I gave her a Tylenol suppository and called (V2/APRN) to report the fever and lethargy and he said he would follow-up with (R1) the next morning. V10 stated R1 had episodes of lethargy in the past where she would look at you but would not speak. V10 reported they sent R1 to the hospital for a similar episode in the past and R1 told the hospital staff she just didn't want to talk to us and wanted to be left alone so she could sleep. V10 confirmed on 04/11/23, R1 did have redness to her legs, however, R1 had intermittent edema/cellulitis in her legs in the past that had been treated with steroid creams and wraps/socks. At times, it was cellulitis, but R1 did have chronic dermatitis. V10 stated, It was not too alarming at that point. I gave the night nurse the report and asked her to monitor R1. At that point, she just had a fever and was not verbalizing, so I thought it was like her past behavior. On 05/04/23 at 11:27 AM, V7 (LPN) stated it was normal for R1 to be incontinent. When asked about the events of her shift on 04/11/23, V7 stated, On 04/11/23, she did not want to get up and get in the shower, but she had been incontinent and had feces everywhere. She would not talk to us; she would glare at us and hold on for dear life to anything she could get a hold of. She would do the same thing to the CNAs in the past when they tried to get her up if she had been incontinent in her recliner through the night. V7 stated that R1 had been running a fever earlier in the day on 04/11/23 and received report it was coming down. V7 stated she kept checking R1's temperature and it was going down. V7 stated there was really no change in R1's condition from when she arrived to when her shift ended on 04/[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize a significant decline in condition and accurately assess,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize a significant decline in condition and accurately assess, treat, and seek progressive emergent treatment in a timely manner for 1 (R1) of 6 residents reviewed for change in condition in a sample of 6. These failures resulted in R1 being transferred to a local hospital on 4/12/23, and R1's subsequent death from cardiopulmonary arrest due to or as a consequence of a probable gastrointestinal hemorrhage. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 4/12/23, when the facility failed to recognize a significant decline in condition and seek timely emergent medical treatment. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 04/28/23 at 12:35 PM. This surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 05/02/23, but non-compliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. Findings include: R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 11/14/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertensive heart disease, dementia, weakness, ataxic gait, muscle weakness, cellulitis of right lower limb, Vitamin D deficiency, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. R1's 2/17/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R1's Care Plan dated 11/21/19 includes - Problem Start Date: 05/20/2022. Category: Psychosocial Well-Being. Resident chooses to be a Do Not Resuscitate. Long Term Goal Target Date: 05/18/2023. Resident will inform staff of changes to advance directive. Approach Start Date: 05/20/2022. Code status available for facility staff members. Will follow resident wish and will not attempt to resuscitate. Will review quarterly, annually or with significant change MDS's. Problem Start Date: 11/21/2019. Category: ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential. Res (resident) has Dx (diagnoses) of COPD, CHF, et HTN (and hypertension). Long Term Goal Target Date: 05/18/23. Resident will maintain vital signs within normal limits, perform activities of daily living, and participate in desired activities without evidence of fatigue and/or weakness, breath sounds clear, vital signs within acceptable range, stable weight, no edema. Approach Start Date of 11/21/19 includes: Maintain a sitting/semi-Fowler_positioning, 1:1 (one on one) relaxation techniques, breathing exercises, redirection, O2 (oxygen) , Nebs (nebulizer), Inhalers etc. (other similar things) .as needed during episodes of severe shortness of breath .Monitor and report signs of respiratory distress: (restlessness, wheezing, dyspnea, difficulty with expectoration, diaphoresis, crackles, bubbling, tachycardia, cyanosis, decreased breath sounds) .Monitor for tachycardia, dyspnea, sweating, pale skin color with activity, E.g. (example given); walking, dressing, bathing .Obtain Diagnostic Tests/Labs per MD (medical doctor) orders et (and) notify of abnormalities . R1's record includes a progress note dated 04/11/2023 at 6:36 PM by V10 (Registered Nurse - RN) that documents, Resident noted to have 104 temp (temperature) axillary. PRN (as needed) Tylenol given suppository. NP (V2 - Advanced Practice Registered Nurse/APRN and Director of Nursing/DON) notified. Awaiting further orders. R1's Progress Note dated 04/11/2023 at 9:17 PM by V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) documents, Resident resting per recliner. Temp is now 101.2. LCTA Resp E/U (lungs clear to auscultation respirations even/ unlabored). Resident is very slow to respond when spoken to, she keeps her head down while sitting in recliner. Resp are at 32. SPO2 94% (oxygen saturation, percent). R1's record under Vital Signs on 04/11/23 at 9:26 PM/9:27 PM by V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) are recorded as: Blood pressure: 91/52, Respirations: 32 (alert triangle with exclamation mark noted), Pulse: 77, and O2 Sat (oxygen saturation): 94%. R1's Progress Note dated 04/12/2023 at 2:31 AM by V7 documents, Resident (R1) had a large loose stool in recliner, on the floor and on resident from head to toe. Both hands coated slathered on fronts of thighs and in her hair. Resident was transferred to w/c (wheelchair) and to shower. Residents temp 100.9, Resp 20, Pulse 64 and regular and SPO2 94%. WCTM (will continue to monitor). Right leg remains bright red and warm to touch. R1's Progress Note dated 04/13/2023 at 6:59 AM by V7 documents, When resident had large loose BM at 2:30 AM 4/12/2023 the stool was thin with undigested food particles noted. Color was an orange, brown color with no noted frank or occult blood. R1's Progress Note dated 04/12/2023 at 2:40 AM by V7 documents, Resident did not speak to staff but could follow staff with eyes. Held onto w/c (wheelchair) and shower chair during transfers. Required max (maximum) assist x 2 (2 staff) with gait belt for transfer. R1's record under Vital Signs, on 04/12/23 at 8:24 AM and recorded by V2, document her pain is assessed as 6 out of 10 and at 11:14 AM, her temperature is 100.1. R1's Progress Note dated 04/12/2023 at 9:39 AM by V2 (APRN/DON) documents, Resident in recliner when passing medications that resident was stupor in recliner and labored breathing. Temp of 102.9. Resident is unresponsive to verbal stimuli however is responsive to painful stimuli of sternal rubs and deep nail press. SPO2 88% on RA (room air). LCTA. Unable to arouse to eat breakfast or take medications PO (by mouth). O2 (oxygen) applied at 3L/min PNC (liters/minute per nasal cannula), Tylenol supp (suppository) given for fever. Cool wash cloths applied to forehead and groin region to decrease temp. Resident was moved to bed out of recliner to perform assessment and treatment. Resident noted with redness, swelling and warmth to RLE (right lower extremity). Cellulitis indicated and resident was given 1-gram Rocephin IM (intramuscularly) x 1 now and then will start Keflex 500 mg (milligram) po tid (three times daily) x 10 days. An Event Report Infection Control Tracker form completed by V2 documents the finding of R1's RLE cellulitis and includes Event Date: 04/12/23 9:26 AM . Classification: Infection Type: Cellulitis/Soft Tissue/Wound. Surveillance Definition Met? McGreers Criteria obv (observation) performed? Yes. Reportable Infection? No. History: Symptoms: Fever, RLE erythema and swelling. Onset Date: 04/12/23. Device Type: No device .Diagnostics (microbiology, other labs, radiology): Diagnostics Performed: No . Treatment: Select which provider ordered testing and treatment: (V2). Order Origin: Nursing Home. Indicate Antibiotic used. If no Antibiotic used, type N/A (not applicable): 04/12/23: Rocephin 1 gram (IM) x 1 now. 04/13/23: Keflex 500 mg po tid x 10 days .Other Information: Was an Event/Observation performed for the related infection? If no, reason needs explained: Yes. Transmission-based Precautions? None. Re-cultured/Assessment Date (if applicable). If yes, indicate date re-tested. NA. Any new orders from re-assessment/culture? If so, indicate new order. NA. Select which provider ordered testing and treatment. (V2) .Additional Information: RLE Cellulitis. Notifications: Attending Faxed: No. Physician Notified: No. Resident Representative Notified: No. Care Plan Reviewed: No. Vitals: Blank. The remainder of this form contains the orders and notes as documented above. R1's record under Vital Signs, on 04/12/23 at 11:14 AM, recorded by V2, documents R1's temperature is 100.1. There were no further recordings of vital signs or documentation of an assessment of R1 in R1's medical record until 04/12/23 at 3:26 PM as documented below. R1's Progress Note dated 04/12/2023 at 3:26 PM by V2 (APRN/DON) documents POA (Power of Attorney/ V3) came to visit resident. Updated POA on current medical condition of resident. Assessed resident while POA in room and noted that resident was in acute respiratory distress. Resident currently on 3L/min PNC, temp is 102.6 prn (as needed). Tylenol supp given at this time. O2 increase to 4L/min. RLE noted to have erythema and swelling and warm to touch, anterior portion erythema has decreased slightly, posterior area unchanged. Mottling noted up to mid-thigh on BLE (bilateral lower extremities). Spoke to POA about changes in condition and explained that sepsis or AKI (acute kidney injury) could be the cause. Resident remains unresponsive to verbal stimuli only has mild responsiveness to sternal rubs. POA states that she would like resident to be evaluated at (name of hospital) however if she has a major issue that she more than likely will not want to do anything. POA chose (name of hospital) to be sent to for evaluation. (Ambulance company) notified and arrived and transferred resident to (hospital). Report was given to V12 (Physician) in the ER (Emergency Room). R1's Prehospital Care Report Summary form from the ambulance company dated 04/12/23 documents that Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived at the facility at 2:57 PM after a 911 call from the facility and that R1 was found unresponsive lying-in bed guppy breathing. Staff stated PT (patient/ R1) respirations had been this way all day and they also noticed that PT has cellulitis to the right leg from the ankle to the knee . and Skin looked normal but on the back side of arms and both legs noticed PT looked like her blood was pooling. The form further states Upon arrival at ED (Emergency Department), PT respirations became worse and while cot into room PT went apneic. Ventilations initiated per ED staff. On 4/27/23 at 12:24 PM, V6 (Paramedic) stated he arrived at the facility on 4/12/23 and found R1 to be lying in bed guppy breathing and unresponsive. V6 said facility staff told him R1 had been guppy breathing like this on and off all day. V6 stated just by the way (R1) was breathing I knew she was not going to last long. V6 said the back side of R1's arms and legs had dark discoloration which looked like blood was pooling, like how blood pools in the skin at the lowest point after a person expires. V6 said R1 stopped breathing as they were going through the ED doors. R1's progress note dated 04/12/2023 at 6:05 PM by V2 documents, Received phone call from V12 (Physician) at (hospital ER). MD (Medical Doctor) states that resident arrived at ER and coded. Attempted to intubate and noticed resident had aspirated on blood. MD states that resident had a massive GI (gastrointestinal) bleed and was DNI (do not intubate) and DNR (do not resuscitate) and resident expired in ER. V4 (Medical Director), V1 (Administrator) aware. V3 at facility when resident expired. R1's hospital ED Physician Documentation dated 4/12/23 at 3:38 PM by V12 documents Patient (R1) was brought in by (ambulance company) with no spontaneous respirations, but an irregular heartbeat. (R1) is DNR/ DNI. (R1) was evidencing black emesis from the mouth and she was full in both lungs of black fluid that appeared to be from a GI bleed. R1 expired fully at 3:49 PM today (4/12/23). R1's Death Certificate documents date of death was 04/12/23. The Cause of Death documents: a. Cardiopulmonary Arrest, due to (or as a consequence of) b. Probable Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. On 4/27/23 at 9:26 AM, V3 (POA) confirmed R1 was not receiving services of hospice or comfort care measures. V3 said she had never told the facility she did not want R1 sent to the hospital if it was medically needed. V3 said R1 was a 'Do Not Resuscitate' but V3 still expected the facility to treat R1. V3 said R1 was alert and oriented on 4/9/23. R1's State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Public Health - IDPH Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form documents in Section A Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), If patient has no pulse and is not breathing, the option of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR) is selected. Section B Medical Interventions, if patient is found with a pulse and/or is breathing the option of Comfort-Focused Treatment is selected and defined as follows: Primary goal of maximizing comfort. Relieve pain and suffering through the use of medication by any route as needed; use oxygen, suctioning and manual treatment of airway obstruction. Do not use treatments listed in Full and Selective Treatment unless consistent with comfort goal. Request transfer to hospital only if comfort needs cannot be met in current location. V3 signed R1's POLST form as her Legal Representative and V2 (APRN/DON) signed as the Authorized Practitioner and both dated 11/14/19. On 4/27/23 at 10:31 AM, V2 (APRN/DON) said he assessed R1 on 4/12/23 in the morning and found R1 was unresponsive and was transferred from the recliner to bed. V2 said R1 was febrile and V2 ordered a Tylenol suppository, Rocephin, and Keflex. V2 said R1 was mainly unresponsive most of the day. V2 said R1's oxygen saturation dropping was not normal for R1 and oxygen was applied. V2 said he did not contact V3 (POA) because V3 had the facility number blocked so R1 could not call V3 during the night. V2 said the facility would text V3 if they needed to report any change in condition. V2 said he did not attempt to contact V3 in any way because V2 did not think R1's change in condition was serious enough to contact V3. V2 said when V3 arrived at the facility, V2 updated V3 on R1's change in condition. V2 said he asked V3 if they wanted R1 to be transferred to the hospital or if they wanted R1 to stay in the facility and keep R1 comfortable. V2 said V3 chose to send R1 to the hospital. V2 said R1 was not under hospice services and was not on comfort care. When V2 was asked if R1 being so unresponsive that R1 could not take medications by mouth and had to have a Tylenol suppository was concerning, V2 said the fever was concerning, that is why I was treating her. On 05/02/23 at 10:25 AM, a follow-up interview was conducted with V3 (POA). V3 was asked to recount and confirm the events on 04/12/23 regarding R1. V3 stated she was there that day because the grandkids had sent some pictures and she wanted to put them in frames and do some decorating in R1's room. V3 added that the whole family had just been in the facility on Easter Sunday (04/09/23) and ate dinner together with R1. V3 stated, My brother and everyone got to see her, so everyone saw her in great condition and she was able to visit. She was perfectly cognitive that Sunday. V3 continued that when she arrived in the facility on the afternoon of 04/12/23, V2 caught her up on what had been happening with R1 from the night before and wanted to prepare her. When this surveyor asked what that meant, V3 stated she was not sure exactly what he meant. V3 stated V2 told her it had been a couple of hours since he had last checked on R1 so they both had gone to her room at that time. V3 stated she felt blindsided. V3 said that R1 was not in her regular room, but in another room across the hall. V3 stated she observed R1 lying flat in a bed with no oxygen on her nose, nor did she observe any oxygen in the room. V3 stated, I don't know how long (R1) had been lying in bed, but (V2) just said the night before she had run a fever, was still running a fever that day, and had been given a shot and antibiotic. (R1) did not have a bed in her regular room because she sleeps in a recliner because of her COPD. She had slept in a chair forever. (R1) was observed to be non-responsive, so V2 tried doing a sternal rub. (R1) did not respond. V2 looked at R1's legs and he saw the mottling in her lower legs and told me 'that concerned him'. V3 stated that V2 told her, It just has me baffled. I don't know what more to do because most of her vital signs were good. V3 stated that it was not clear to V2 what he was dealing with, and at that point V3 said, I think we need to send her to the hospital and that maybe it was something an IV could take care of. If it was not something the ER could stabilize, I would have gone from there and discussed comfort care if nothing else would have worked at that time. When asked if she had spoken to the hospital yet, she (V3) stated, Not really, I was told she had passed in the ambulance. She had thrown up some black tarry vomit and had a major gastric bleed. The ER doctor did tell me that. A few years ago, she (R1) was in another hospital for a gastric bleed. That was another thing that raised questions for me because she had COPD and a history of gastric bleed, and I didn't receive a phone call from anyone in the facility prior to me walking in on 04/12/23. When asked if V3 had any of her phone numbers blocked so the facility would be unable to contact her, V3 stated, I did not have my phone off and my phone number is not blocked to receive calls from the facility. A lot of times I may not hear the ringer or may not have my phone on me but if I had missed a call, I'd have seen that and would have called back immediately. I have missed calls before and I always return their call. I have phone records to show there were no missed calls from the facility on 04/11/23 or 04/12/23. When asked about receiving texts, V3 stated she had received texts in the past from V2. On 4/27/23 at 9:50 AM, V4 (Medical Director/Physician) said if a resident was found to be febrile, unresponsive to verbal stimuli, and have labored breathing with an oxygen saturation in the 80's he expected the facility would contact V4. V4 said if it is a serious problem the resident should be transferred to the hospital. V4 said he expected the facility to notify a resident's POA with any change in condition. V4 said it is possible if R1 was transferred to the hospital six hours earlier, when symptom onset began, R1 may not have expired. On 04/28/23 at 3:24 PM, V4 was contacted for a second interview. V4 stated that a resident's condition certainly changes, and they should be taken care of appropriately. Sometimes the patient and the family change their mind or direction they are going when they sign the POLST originally, but there should be a clear understanding from the patient and family of what treatment they want. When asked if DNR meant do not treat, V4 confirmed it means, Do Not Resuscitate, adding the patient should always be taken care of regarding their symptoms or whatever is happening. When asked if on 04/12/23, the emergency room could have provided any further or different treatment than R1 had already been provided at the facility, V4 stated when you go to the hospital, they do everything so they can find out what is going on. An additional document with the State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Public Health seal titled Illinois Statutory Short Form Power of Attorney for Health Care documents that R1 wants (V3) to be her health care agent. The form further documents, I authorize my agent to with the box checked Make decisions for me starting now and continue after I am no longer able to make them for myself. While I am still able to make my own decisions, I can still do so if I want to. Under Life-Sustaining Treatments documents, in part . In general, in making decisions concerning life-sustaining treatment, your agent is instructed to consider the relief of suffering, the quality as well as the possible extension of your life, and your previously expressed wishes. Your agent will weigh the burdens versus benefits of proposed treatments in making decisions on your behalf. On 05/02/23 at 3:05 PM, V2 (APRN/DON), V9 (Chief Executive Officer/CEO), and V1 (Administrator) entered the conference room where this surveyor was working. V2 again stated he had not been given the chance to report the events that transpired throughout the day on 04/12/23 regarding R1's condition. V2 was asked if he had any new information he would like to provide at this time. V2 stated when he got to R1's room on 04/12/23 to pass medication at approximately 7:30 AM, she was sitting up in her recliner with her chin down to her chest. V2 stated he did notice she looked uncomfortable at that time stating R1 was stupor and not as alert. V2 stated, I did a sternal rub on her. She did wake up and look at me. Then, I asked her if she was hurting. She did not respond to that. At that point, we moved her from the recliner to the bed in a room across the hall. V2 stated once R1 was in bed her vital signs were checked. R1's oxygen saturation was about 88/89%, so she was placed on oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 liters and the head of her bed was elevated to 45 degrees. V2 stated, While I was in there, I assessed her by listening to her lungs which were clear and I checked her skin. I did see that her right lower extremity had some redness, swelling, and was warm to the touch and she had a fever of 102 degrees. V2 stated at that point he gave R1 a Tylenol suppository and an injection of Rocephin. V2 stated he placed cool wash clothes on her forehead, armpits, and groin and from there made the decision not to give her any oral intake due to the risk of aspiration. V2 stated R1 was peaceful and comfortable at this time. V2 stated that after R1 was settled, he went to the nursing station and continued with nursing duties. He did attempt to call R1's POA (V3) but it only rang once and the call was disconnected. V2 stated normally if she saw we called, she would call back or come in. V2 stated, It could be minutes, hours, or days before you would get a response. V2 stated at 9:30 AM, he checked on R1 again, removed the wash cloths, but did not check her temperature because it would not have given a correct reading. V2 stated R1 had no rapid breathing, nothing appeared abnormal, and R1 displayed no signs or symptoms of pain. V2 stated he did not attempt to wake R1 at that time opting to let her rest. V2 stated that he went back at 11:00 AM, rechecked her temperature and it was 101 degrees. He did try to wake her by speaking to her but she did not wake up. V2 stated he did another sternal rub and R1 did wake up, open her eyes, and groaned slightly. V2 stated R1's lungs were still clear at that time, she had no symptoms of respiratory distress, and her color was good. V2 stated he asked the CNAs if they would attempt to feed her at lunch and they reported back to him that R1 did not eat lunch. V2 stated the CNAs checked on R1 around noon, then V2 went back down around 2:30 PM when V3 showed up to visit R1. V2 stated he assessed R1 with V3 present, and her fever was 102 degrees. V2 stated he administered another Tylenol suppository and explained that R1 had cellulitis that could be causing the fever. V2 stated V3 tried to wake R1 up herself by repeating her name and when she did that, R1 started breathing heavier and more labored than what she had been previously. V2 stated he explained the options of keeping R1 in the facility would be to keep her comfortable, pain free, and without respiratory distress or they could send her to the ER and see if there was anything else that was going on they might be able to fix. V2 stated, V3 asked him what he thought, and he told V3 it was her decision, and that V2 could do either. V2 stated, I could start her on Morphine/Ativan or send her to the hospital. V3 then asked which hospital she should go to. V2 again told V3 that was her decision. V2 stated R1 did not appear critical at that time, so it was up to V3. V2 stated that V3 opted to send R1 to the hospital, claiming that the family would be mad at her if she didn't send R1 to the hospital. V2 stated V3 then said if they find anything serious, she was not going to do anything. V2 then told V3 he would call EMS and have her sent. V2 stated V3 asked him if she had to be there and he again told V3 that it was up to her but he would give report to the ER. V2 stated V3 left at that time, EMS arrived and did not do an in-room assessment - just got report from him. V2 stated, R1 was loaded on the stretcher and was in their hands after that. V2 stated he gave report to V12 in the ER. V12 called back about an hour later and explained to V2 that R1 had passed .that she coded when she came through the ER doors, (V12) attempted to intubate but saw what appeared to be aspiration of blood and assumed she had a massive GI bleed. They witnessed the POLST form DNR and did not proceed with intubation nor any further treatment. On 05/02/23 at 3:30 PM, V9 (Chief Executive Officer/CEO/Social Services) stated V3 came by the next day to get R1's belongings and praised the facility for the care of R1. V9 had with him the IDPH printout titled, Guidance Document for Illinois Health Care Professionals and Providers - Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Uniform Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment and stated he wanted to go over the parts he highlighted. V9 then read from Page 2 of this document - healthcare professionals and institutional providers are legally protected from liability if, in good faith they honor the instructions contained in the POLST form . V9 stated, Which is exactly what we did. V9 stated R1's POLST indicated she was comfort focused treatment. V9 stated, This is the big one, and read the following from the document - Transfer to hospital only if comfort cannot be achieved in the comfort setting . V9 stated, We were going by what was on her POLST .I think we were within our guidelines and it's cut and dry we were following the resident's wishes. V9 read, POLST portable medical orders form, signed by the patient's qualified healthcare practitioner and either the patient or their legal representative, converts the patient's care choices into an actionable medical order that all other physicians, nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, long-term care facilities, hospices, home health agencies, emergency medical services, hospital staff, and other provider staff are required by law to honor . V9 also read, .the POLST model allows individuals to specify the intensity of medical interventions when they experience a life-threatening emergency where they still have a pulse. On 05/02/23 at 3:45 PM, V2 stated he believes the facility did everything as they should have and provided the care and comfort to R1 she required prior to her being transferred to the ER on [DATE]. When asked if V2 had anything else he would like to add to his interview, he stated, I stand beside the treatment R1 received in the facility on 04/11/23 and 04/12/23. If I had to do it over, I would do the same thing. I wouldn't change anything. The facility's 11/12/22 Notification of Changes in Condition policy documented in part . The facility must inform . the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstance requiring notification include: 2. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status . 3. Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment . According to https://www.polstil.org/resources-for-healthcare-providers/, the Guidance Document for Healthcare Professionals documents the following in part . POLST stands for 'Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment.' A POLST form is a signed medical order that travels with the patient to assure that a patient's treatment preferences are honored across settings of care. The POLST form is designed to ensure that seriously ill or frail patients can choose the treatments they want or do not want and that their wishes are documented and honored Use of the POLST form is voluntary. This form contains orders that can be revoked or changed at any time by patients or their legal representative When a patient's condition changes significantly, prior decisions about treatment should be revisited and consideration should be given to completing a new, updated POLST form. On 05/04/23 at 8:23 AM, V15 (LPN) stated prior to R1's fever the evening of 04/11/23, she did not appear to have anything going on. V15 stated, It seemed like it came out of nowhere. It seemed like it happened very quickly. V15 stated R1 would propel through the facility in her wheelchair but did stay in her room quite a bit. She was not able to ambulate or stand/transfer on her own but once she was in the wheelchair she could propel independently where she wanted to go. On 05/04/23 at 9:07 AM, V16 (CNA) and V8 (CNA) both stated normally R1 was awake and alert but sometimes she would get sleepy and tell us she just wanted to sleep. She had a habit of staying up at night sometimes and going through the drawers/packing her things to go home. V16 stated they would have to check the schedule but the last time they worked, R1 was fine. V8 stated the last time she worked and saw R1 was on 04/11/23 between 6:30 AM and 3:00 PM. V8 stated R1 had a shower that day and was tired after and wanted to sleep. V8 stated R1 slept in her recliner. V8 stated she did work the same shift on 04/12/23 but was not really involved with R1's care that day. However, there was nothing observed that would have given an indication R1 needed to be sent out to the hospital. She just knows she was sent out to the hospital and was surprised to hear she passed away. On 05/04/23 at 11:03 AM, V10 (RN) stated she did work on 04/11/23 from 2:30 PM to 7:00 PM. V10 was asked about R1's condition that day. V10 stated, I remember she started running a fever when I was getting ready to leave between 6:15 PM and 6:30 PM that evening. I gave her a Tylenol suppository and called (V2/APRN) to report the fever and lethargy and he said he would follow-up with (R1) the next morning. V10 stated R1 had episodes of lethargy in the past where she would look at you but would not speak. V10 reported they sent R1 to the hospital for a similar episode in the past and R1 told the hospital staff she just didn't want to talk to us and wanted to be left alone so she could sleep. V10 confirmed on 04/11/23, R1 did have redness to her legs, however, R1 had intermittent edema/cellulitis in her legs in the past that had been treated with steroid creams and wraps/socks. At times, it was cellulitis, but R1 did have chronic dermatitis. V10 stated, It was not too alarming at that point. I gave the night nurse the report and asked her to monitor R1. At that point, she just had a fever and was not verbalizing, so I thought it was like her past behavior. On 05/04/23 at 11:27 AM, V7 (LPN) stated it was normal for R1 to be incontinent. When asked about the events of her shift on 04/11/23, V7 stated, On 04/11/23, she did not want to get up and get in the shower, but she had been incontinent and had feces everywhere. She would not talk to us; she would glare at us and hold on for dear life to anything she could get a hold of. She would do the same thing to the CNAs in the past when they tried to get her up if she had been incontinent in her recliner through the night. V7 stated that R1 had been running a fever earlier in the day on 04/11/23 and received report it was coming down. V7 stated she kept checking R1's temperature and it was going down. V7 stated there was really no change in R1's condition from when she arrived to when her shift ended on 04/11/23, and there was nothing to make her think R1 should expire the next day. V7 stated that other than R1's leg being red, there was nothing different at all. R1 sat in her recliner with her head on her chest like she did every night. V2 was treating the redness to the leg with the Rocephin injection and antibiotic. V7 stated, I had been in contact with (V2) through the night regarding (R1's) condition and[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's family member/Power of Attorney (POA) in accord...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's family member/Power of Attorney (POA) in accordance with facility policy when there was a significant change in the resident's condition for 1 (R1) of 6 residents reviewed for resident representative notification in a sample of 6. Findings Include: R1's face sheet documented an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertensive heart disease, dementia, weakness, ataxic gait, muscle weakness, cellulitis of right lower limb, Vitamin D deficiency, chronic kidney disease stage 3. R1's [DATE] Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R1's face sheet, under Contacts documents that V3 (Family Member/POA-Power of Attorney) is listed as R1's Emergency Contact/Responsible Party and lists a primary phone number, a cell phone number and an email address. V13 (Family Member) is listed as a second Emergency Contact, however the face sheet does not have a phone number listed. A third family member (V18) is listed with a phone number as well, although not listed as an Emergency Contact. The face sheet designates a call order as V3 (first), V13 (second), and V18 (third). R1's record includes the following progress notes in part - On [DATE] at 6:36 PM, V10 (Registered Nurse - RN) documented - Resident (R1) noted to have 104 temp axillary. PRN (as needed) Tylenol given suppository. NP (V2 - Advanced Practice Registered Nurse/APRN - Director of Nursing/DON) notified. Awaiting further orders. On [DATE] at 9:17 PM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) documented - Resident (R1) resting per recliner. Temp is now 101.2. LCTA Resp E/U (lungs clear to auscultation respirations even and unlabored). Resident is very slow to respond when spoken too, she keeps her head down while sitting in recliner. Respirations are at 32. SPO2 94% (oxygen saturation). R1's record under Vital Signs on [DATE] at 9:26 PM/9:27 PM documented by V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) are recorded as - Blood pressure: 91/52, Respirations: 32 (alert triangle with exclamation mark noted), Pulse: 77, and 02 Sat: 94%. On [DATE] at 2:31 AM, V7 (LPN) continues to document - Resident (R1) had a large loose stool in recliner, on the floor and on resident from head to toe. Both hands coated slathered on fronts of thighs and in her hair. Resident was transferred to w/c (wheelchair) and to shower. Residents temp 100.9, Resp 20, Pulse 64 and regular and SPO2 94%. WCTM (will continue to monitor). Right leg remains bright red and warm to touch. On [DATE] at 2:40 AM, V7 also noted - Resident (R1) did not speak to staff but could follow staff with eyes. Held onto w/c and shower chair during transfers. Required max (maximum) assist x 2 with gait belt for transfer. R1's record under Vital Signs on [DATE] by V2 (APRN/DON) at 8:24 AM, document R1's pain is assessed as 6 out of 10, and at 11:14 AM, her temperature is 100.1. On [DATE] at 9:39 AM V2 (APRN/DON) documented - Noted Resident in recliner when passing medications that resident was stupor in recliner and labored breathing. Temp of 102.9. Resident is unresponsive to verbal stimuli however is responsive to painful stimuli of sternal rubs and deep nail press. SPO2 88% on RA (room air). LCTA (lungs clear to auscultation). Unable to arouse to eat breakfast or take medications PO (by mouth). O2 (oxygen) applied at 3L/min (liters per minute) PNC (per nasal cannula), Tylenol supp (suppository) given for fever. Cool wash cloths applied to forehead and groin region to decrease temp. Resident was moved to bed out of recliner to perform assessment and treatment. Resident noted with redness, swelling and warmth to RLE (right lower extremity). Cellulitis indicated and resident was given 1-gram Rocephin IM (intramuscularly) x 1 now and then will start Keflex 500 mg (milligram) po tid (three times daily) x 10 days. The facility was unable to provide documentation or reproducible evidence that the V3 (POA) or any other family members had been notified of R1's change in condition. V2 (APRN/DON) completed an Event Report Infection Control Tracker form related to the finding of R1's RLE cellulitis and includes - Event Date: [DATE] 9:26 AM . Classification: Infection Type: Cellulitis/Soft Tissue/Wound. Surveillance Definition Met? McGreer's Criteria obv (observation) performed? Yes. Reportable Infection? No. History: Symptoms: Fever, RLE erythema and swelling. Onset Date: [DATE]. Device Type: No device . Diagnostics (microbiology, other labs, radiology): Diagnostics Performed: No . Treatment: Select which provider ordered testing and treatment: (V2). Order Origin: Nursing Home. Indicate Antibiotic used. If no Antibiotic used, type N/A (not applicable): [DATE]: Rocephin 1 gram (IM) x 1 now. [DATE]: Keflex 500 mg po tid x 10 days .Other Information: Was an Event/Observation performed for the related infection. If no, reason needs explained: Yes. Transmission-based Precautions? None. Re-cultured/Assessment Date (if applicable). If yes, indicate date re-tested. NA. Any new orders from re-assessment/culture? If so, indicate new order. NA. Select which provider ordered testing and treatment. (V2) .Additional Information: RLE Cellulitis. Notifications: Attending Faxed: No. Physician Notified: No. Resident Representative Notified: No. Care Plan Reviewed: No. Vitals: Blank. The remainder of this form contains the orders and notes as documented above. R1's record under Vital Signs on [DATE] by V2 at 11:14 AM records her temperature is 100.1. It should be noted this is the last vital sign the facility was able to confirm until 3:26 PM later this same day. R1's record continues to document in progress notes the events that led up to R1 being sent out for emergent treatment - On [DATE] at 3:26 PM, V3 (Family Member/POA) came to visit (R1). Updated POA on current medical condition of resident. Assessed resident while POA in room and noted that resident was in acute respiratory distress. Resident currently on 3L/min PNC, temp is 102.6 prn (as needed). Tylenol supp given at this time. O2 increase to 4L/min. RLE noted to have erythema and swelling and warm to touch, anterior portion erythema has decreased slightly, posterior area unchanged. Mottling noted up to mid-thigh on BLE (bilateral extremities). Spoke to POA about changes in condition and explained that sepsis or AKI (acute kidney injury) could be the cause. Resident remains unresponsive to verbal stimuli only has mild responsiveness to sternal rubs. POA states that she would like resident to be evaluated at (hospital) however if she has a major issue that she more than likely will not want to do anything. POA chose (name of hospital) to be sent to for evaluation. (Ambulance) notified and arrived and transferred resident to (name of hospital). Report was given to V12 (Physician) in the ER. On [DATE] at 10:31 AM, V2 said he assessed R1 on [DATE] in the morning and found R1 was unresponsive and was transferred from the recliner to bed. V2 said R1 was febrile and V2 ordered a Tylenol suppository, Rocephin, and Keflex. V2 said R1 was mainly unresponsive most of the day. V2 said R1's oxygen saturation dropping was not normal for R1 and oxygen was applied. V2 said he did not contact V3 (POA) because V3 had the facility number blocked so R1 could not call V3 during the night. V2 said the facility would text V3 if they needed to report any change in condition. V2 said he did not attempt to contact V3 in any way because V2 did not think R1's change in condition was serious enough to contact V3. V2 said when V3 arrived at the facility, V2 updated V3 on R1's change in condition. V2 said he asked V3 if they wanted R1 to be transferred to the hospital or if they wanted R1 to stay in the facility and keep R1 comfortable. V2 said V3 chose to send R1 to the hospital. V2 said R1 was not under hospice services and was not on comfort care. When V2 was asked if R1 being so unresponsive that R1 could not take medications by mouth and had to have a Tylenol suppository was concerning, V2 said, The fever was concerning, that is why I was treating her. On [DATE] at 9:26 AM, V3 (POA) confirmed R1 was not receiving services of hospice or comfort care measures. V3 said she had never told the facility she did not want R1 sent to the hospital if it was medically needed. V3 said R1 was a Do Not Resuscitate but V3 still expected the facility to treat R1. V3 said R1 was alert and oriented on [DATE]. R1's State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Public Health - IDPH Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form documents in Section A Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), If patient has not pulse and is not breathing, the option of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR) is selected. Section B Medical Interventions, if patient is found with a pulse and/or is breathing the option of Comfort-Focused Treatment is selected and defined as follows: Primary goal of maximizing comfort. Relieve pain and suffering through the use of medication by any route as needed; use oxygen, suctioning and manual treatment of airway obstruction. Do not use treatments listed in Full and Selective Treatment unless consistent with comfort goal. Request transfer to hospital only if comfort needs cannot be met in current location. V3 signed R1's POLST form as her Legal Representative and V2 (APRN/DON) signed as the Authorized Practitioner and both dated [DATE]. On [DATE] at 10:25 AM, a follow-up interview was conducted with V3 (POA). V3 was asked to recount and confirm the events on [DATE] regarding R1. V3 stated she was there that day because the grandkids had sent some pictures and she wanted to put them in frames and do some decorating in R1's room. V3 added that the whole family had just been in the facility on Easter Sunday ([DATE]) and ate dinner together with R1. V3 stated, My brother and everyone got to see her, so everyone saw her in great condition and she was able to visit. She was perfectly cognitive that Sunday. V3 continued that when she arrived in the facility on the afternoon of [DATE], V2 caught her up on what had been happening with R1 from the night before and wanted to prepare her. When this surveyor asked what that meant, V3 stated she was not sure exactly what he meant. V3 stated V2 told her it had been a couple of hours since he had last checked on R1 so they both had gone to her room at that time. V3 stated she felt blindsided. V3 said that R1 was not in her regular room, but in another room across the hall. V3 stated she observed R1 lying flat in a bed with no oxygen on her nose, nor did she observe any oxygen in the room. V3 stated, I don't know how long (R1) had been lying in bed, but (V2) just said the night before she had run a fever, was still running a fever that day, and had been given a shot and antibiotic. (R1) did not have a bed in her regular room because she sleeps in a recliner because of her COPD. She had slept in a chair forever. (R1) was observed to be non-responsive, so V2 tried doing a sternal rub. (R1) did not respond. V2 looked at R1's legs and he saw the mottling in her lower legs and told me 'that concerned him'. V3 stated that V2 told her, It just has me baffled. I don't know what more to do because most of her vital signs were good. V3 stated that it was not clear to V2 what he was dealing with, and at that point V3 said, I think we need to send her to the hospital and that maybe it was something an IV could take care of. If it was not something the ER could stabilize, I would have gone from there and discussed comfort care if nothing else would have worked at that time. When asked if she had spoken to the hospital yet, she (V3) stated, Not really, I was told she had passed in the ambulance. She had thrown up some black tarry vomit and had a major gastric bleed. The ER doctor did tell me that a few years ago, she was in another hospital for a gastric bleed. That was another thing that raised questions for me because she had COPD and a history of gastric bleed, and I didn't receive a phone call from anyone in the facility prior to me walking in on [DATE]. When asked if V3 had any of her phone numbers blocked so the facility would be unable to contact her, V3 stated, I did not have my phone off and my phone number is not blocked to receive calls from the facility. A lot of times I may not hear the ringer or may not have my phone on me but if I had missed a call, I'd have seen that and would have called back immediately. I have missed calls before and I always return their call. I have phone records to show there were no missed calls from the facility on [DATE] or [DATE]. When asked about receiving texts, V3 stated she had received texts in the past from V2. On [DATE] at 9:50 AM, V4 (Medical Director/Physician) said if a resident was found to be febrile, unresponsive to verbal stimuli, and have labored breathing with an oxygen saturation in the 80's he expected the facility would contact V4. V4 said if it is a serious problem the resident should be transferred to the hospital. V4 said he expected the facility to notify a resident's POA with any change in condition. V4 said it is possible if R1 was transferred to the hospital six hours earlier, when symptom onset began, R1 may not have expired. On [DATE] at 3:24 PM, V4 was contacted for a second interview. V4 stated that a resident's condition certainly changes and they should be taken care of appropriately. Sometimes the patient and the family change their mind or direction they are going when they sign the POLST originally, but there should be a clear understanding from the patient and family of what treatment they want. An additional document with the State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Public Health seal titled Illinois Statutory Short Form Power of Attorney for Health Care documents that R1 wants (V3) to be her health care agent. The form further documents I authorize my agent to with the box checked Make decisions for me starting now and continue after I am no longer able to make them for myself. While I am still able to make my own decisions, I can still do so if I want to. Under Life-Sustaining Treatments documents, in part . In general, in making decisions concerning life-sustaining treatment, your agent is instructed to consider the relief of suffering, the quality as well as the possible extension of your life, and your previously expressed wishes. Your agent will weigh the burdens versus benefits of proposed treatments in making decisions on your behalf. The facility's [DATE] Notification of Changes in Condition policy documented in part .The facility must inform .the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstance requiring notification include: 2. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status . 3. Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment .
Sept 2022 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was ambulated to the bathroom for toileting per th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was ambulated to the bathroom for toileting per the resident's preference for to 1 of 6 residents (R22) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 26. Findings include: R22's face sheet documented R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses including: muscle weakness, ataxic gait, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, history of overflow incontinence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic diastolic heart failure. R22's 8/19/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicates R22 is moderately cognitively impaired. The same MDS documents under section G that R22 requires supervision and setup for toilet use. On 9/20/22 at 11:27 AM, R22 was observed sitting in her room in a wheelchair. R22 was alert to person, place and time. R22's room had a rolling walker present. R22 said she needed to have assistance to ambulate to the bathroom. R22 said facility staff did not assist her quick enough to ambulate to the bathroom to void and she would be incontinent on herself. R22 said if facility staff would assist her to the toilet regularly, she would not have to wear an incontinent brief. On 9/23/22 at 10:31 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON)/ Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) said R22 can wheel herself to the bathroom and alerts staff to when she needs assistant toileting. V2 denied R22 being on a toileting program. The facility's 2022 Promoting/ Maintaining Resident Dignity policy documented in part . It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident right and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner . that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life 2. The resident's . personal choices will be considered when providing care and services to meet the resident's needs and preferences . 4. Respond to requests for assistance in a timely manner .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately code restorative therapy days for 1 of 6 re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately code restorative therapy days for 1 of 6 residents (R22) reviewed for MDS (Minimum Data Set) accuracy in a sample of 26. Findings include: R22's face sheet documented R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses included: muscle weakness, ataxic gait, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, history of overflow incontinence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic diastolic heart failure. R22's 8/19/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicates R22 is moderately cognitively impaired. The same MDS documents under section G that R22 requires limited assistance of one when walking in room and walking in corridor. The same MDS documents under section O: Restorative Nursing Programs walking 7 days per week. R22's Care Plan with initial start date 4/15/20, last revised 8/19/22 documented in part .needs Walk to Dine Restorative Program as tol (tolerated) r/t (related to) decline in ability to walk . with interventions including . cue res (resident) as needed using task segmentation . Provide only the amount of assist necessary to ensure walking task is completed safely . Report any declines in activities . Use adaptive equipment: rollator et (and) gait belt . Walk to Dine Program TID (three times a day) c (with) rollator et CGA (contact guard assist) x7 days per week as tol . On 9/20/22 at 11:27 AM, R22 was observed sitting in her room in a wheelchair. R22 was interviewable. R22's room had a rolling walker present. R22 stated I only get assisted to walk one day a week when therapy is here. The rest of the time I'm in my wheelchair. R22 said if the facility staff would assist her to get strong enough to walk, she believed she could go home. On 9/21/22 at 1:05 PM, R22 was sitting in the dining room after eating the noon time meal. R22 was not asked or encouraged by staff to ambulate with assistance back to her room. R22 was observed wheeling herself back to her room. On 9/21/22 at 3:21 PM, R22 was sitting in her room in her wheelchair. R22 denied any facility staff asking or encouraging her to walk to or from the dining room with assistance. R22 said no facility staff has assisted her to walk to or from the dining room in ages. On 9/22/22 at 1:43 PM, V7 Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) said she had been working in the facility since March of 2022. V7 said R22 had not been able to walk since V7 has been employed in the facility. V7 said R22 was not on a restorative walking program to her knowledge. V7 said resident restorative programs could be found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). V7 then opened R22's EMR and verified R22 was on a restorative walking program. V7 said restorative therapy should be documented every day if the resident participated or refused. V7 said she did not know who to tell if a resident was unable to participate in a restorative therapy program. On 9/22/22 at 2:47 PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON)/ Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) said the Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) should be completing any restorative therapy activities. V2 said CNAs should be documenting in the EMR if a resident is participating or refused. On 9/23/22 at 10:31 AM V2 said he was aware R22 usually refused to participate in restorative therapy. V2 said R22's 8/19/22 MDS had been coded with at least 15 minutes of participation of walking restorative therapy daily, between the dates of 8/12/22 and 8/19/22, as seven because R22 was offered restorative therapy. V2 said V2 was aware R22 did not participate in walking restorative therapy for at least 15 minutes per day in the seven days look back period for R22's 8/19/22 MDS. V2 said the time spent working with residents on restorative therapy programs would be found on the Nursing Rehab Time log. R22's Nursing Rehab Time Log documented nine entries for the month of August 2022: (8/5/22, 8/14/22, 8/22/22 could not assess), (8/6/22, 8/11/22, 8/20/22, 8/31/22 deferred due to condition), (8/13/22, 8/19/22 refused).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide restorative services to maintain a resident's ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide restorative services to maintain a resident's mobility for 1 of 2 residents (R22) reviewed for restorative therapy in a sample of 26. Findings include: R22's face sheet documented R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses included: muscle weakness, ataxic gait, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, history of overflow incontinence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic diastolic heart failure. R22's 8/19/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicates R22 is moderately cognitively impaired. The same MDS documents under section G that R22 requires limited assistance of one when walking in room and walking in corridor. The same MDS documents under section O Restorative Nursing Programs walking 7 days per week. R22's Care Plan with initial start date 4/15/20, last revised 8/19/22 documented in part .needs Walk to Dine Restorative Program as tol (tolerated) r/t (related to) decline in ability to walk . with interventions including . cue res (resident) as needed using task segmentation . Provide only the amount of assist necessary to ensure walking task is completed safely . Report any declines in activities . Use adaptive equipment: rollator et (and) gait belt . Walk to Dine Program TID (three times a day) c (with) rollator et CGA (contact guard assist) x7 days per week as tol . On 9/20/22 at 11:27 AM, R22 was observed sitting in her room in a wheelchair. R22 was alert to person, place and time. R22's room had a rolling walker present. R22 stated I only get assisted to walk one day a week when therapy is here. The rest of the time I'm in my wheelchair. R22 said if the facility staff would assist her to get strong enough to walk, she believed she could go home. On 9/21/22 at 1:05 PM, R22 was sitting in the dining room after eating the noon time meal. R22 was not asked or encouraged by staff to ambulate with assistance back to her room. R22 was observed wheeling herself back to her room. On 9/21/22 at 3:21 PM, R22 was sitting in her room in her wheelchair. R22 denied any facility staff asking or encouraging her to walk to or from the dining room with assistance. R22 said no facility staff has assisted her to walk to or from the dining room in ages. On 9/23/22 at 9:50 AM, V6 Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) said R22 was receiving physical therapy in February and March of 2022. V6 said one of R22's physical therapy goals were to safely ambulate 75 feet and that goal was met 2/18/22. V6 said when a resident meets their goal in therapy, they should be placed on a restorative therapy program to maintain the level of physical ability achieved during physical therapy. V6 said if R22 had a decline in functional abilities R22 should have been reevaluated by physical therapy. R22's Physical Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE]-[DATE] documents in part, d/c (discharge) reason- Patient refuses treatment .discharge date [DATE] . Summary Since Eval/SOC- Patient response- Progress & Response to Tx (treatment): Pt (patient) progress w/transfers & gait, however pt decided she wanted to be done w/therapy . Discharge recommendations: con't with transfers assist with nursing. R22's 2/1/22- 3/16/22 Physical Therapy Treatment Encounter Notes documented in part . 2/7/22 . Pt amb c 4 wheeled rollator CGA/[NAME] up to 125' c cueing (patient ambulated with four wheeled rollator contact guard assist/ minimum assist up to 125 feet with cueing) . 2/25/22 . the pt (patient) ambulated with rollator in the halls 80'x2 (80 feet times two) with rest breaks after 80 (80 feet) . On 9/22/22 at 1:43 PM, V7 Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) said she had been working in the facility since March of 2022. V7 said R22 had not been able to walk since V7 has been employed in the facility. V7 said R22 was not on a restorative walking program to her knowledge. V7 said resident restorative programs could be found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). V7 then open R22's EMR and verified R22 was on a restorative walking program. V7 said restorative therapy should be documented every day if the resident participated or refused. V7 said she did not know who to tell if a resident was unable to participate in a restorative therapy program. On 9/22/22 at 2:47 PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON)/ Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) said the Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) should be completing any restorative therapy activities. V2 said CNAs should be documenting in the EMR if a resident is participating or refused. V2 said the time spent working with residents on restorative therapy programs would be found on the Nursing Rehab Time log. On 9/23/22 at 10:31 AM, V2 said residents should be assessed for restorative therapy programs quarterly. V2 said if a resident is regularly refusing to participate in a restorative therapy program they should be reassessed. R22's Nursing Rehab Time Log Number of Minutes for Walking, documents from 3/9/22 to 9/14/22, R22 was walked in sessions of 5-10 minutes on 11 of those days. During those days R22 walked between 25-125 feet with either using wheelchair or walker with 1 person assist. All other days were either not listed, marked as refused, could not assess or deferred due to condition. The facility's April 2006 Range of Motion policy documented in part . Purpose . 2. To improve or maintain joint mobility and muscle strength . 4. To increase strength and activity tolerance . Special considerations . 1. When the resident's activity level or joint function is at risk or decreased, range of motion should be started as soon as possible. Joints may begin to stiffen within 24 hours or disuse . 2. Encourage the resident to participate in the exercise .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R10's face sheet documented an initial admission date of [DATE]. R10's face sheet documented diagnoses included: urinary trac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R10's face sheet documented an initial admission date of [DATE]. R10's face sheet documented diagnoses included: urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, retention of urine, uninhibited neurogenic bladder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. The facility's Resolved Infection by Infection Type log documented in part R10 was diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) on 9/2/22. R10's 9/2/22 Event Report documented in part R10 was started on oral Bactrim DS twice a day for seven days. The facility was able to produce documentation a urinalysis had been completed on 9/2/22 but a culture and sensitivity was not completed. On 9/23/22 at 10:31 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON)/ Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) said no culture and sensitivity was completed for R10's 9/2/22 UTI. V2 said R10's urine was milky with sediment and dark. V2 said V2 prescribed R10 Bactrim on 9/2/22 and if they don't get better then we would send the urine out for culture to see if there would be a better antibiotic choice. The facility undated Antibiotic Stewardship Program documents, It is the policy of this facility to implement an antibiotic stewardship program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use The program includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. Nursing staff shall assess residents who are suspected to have an infection and complete an antibiotic need form prior to notifying the physician. Laboratory testing shall be in accordance with current standards of practice. All prescriptions for antibiotics shall specify the dose, duration, and indication for use. Reassessment of empiric antibiotics is conducted after 2-3 days for appropriateness and necessity, factoring in results of diagnostic tests, laboratory reports, and/or changed in the clinical status of the resident. Whenever possible, narrow-spectrum antibiotics that are appropriate for the condition being treated shall be utilized if physician prescribes . The research article titled Urinary Tract Infections in Older Adults Resident in Long-Term Care Facilities found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3573848/ and dated 2/15/2013 documents the following, Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are commonly suspected in residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities, and it has been common practice to prescribe antibiotics to these patients, even when they are asymptomatic. This approach, however, often does more harm than good, leading to increased rates of adverse drug effects and more recurrent infections with drug-resistant bacteria. It also does not improve genitourinary symptoms (eg, polyuria or malodorous urine) or lead to improved mortality rates; thus, distinguishing UTIs from asymptomatic bacteriuria is imperative in the LTC setting. This article provides a comprehensive overview of UTI in the LTC setting, outlining the epidemiology, risk factors and pathophysiology, microbiology, diagnosis, laboratory assessment, and management of symptomatic UTI .Unlike the case for UTI in community-dwelling older adults, a urine specimen with bacteriuria and pyuria in LTC residents is insufficient to confirm a diagnosis of clinically suspected UTI. Both conditions will be present in approximately half of patients without a catheter and in almost all patients with an IUC. Dipstick testing for urine is a fast method for ruling out UTI as the cause of the residents' symptoms. [NAME] and colleagues32 demonstrated a negative predictive value of 100% but a positive predictive value of 45% with this method; thus, a positive leukocyte esterase and/or nitrate result is not synonymous with infection, but if both results are negative, the clinician can be certain that there is no UTI The choice of antibiotic to treat UTI in LTC facilities should be individualized on the basis of the patient's allergy history and renal clearance, local practice patterns, prevalence of resistance at the patient's LTC facility, availability and cost of the antibiotic, and the threshold for noncompliance. In addition, treatment requires microbiological confirmation and should be tailored toward bacterial susceptibility; empiric treatment can be based on prior urine cultures, if available. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify organisms by conducting culture and sensitivities to ensure appropriate antibiotic use for 2 of 3 (R10 and R15) residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 26. Findings Include: 1. R15's Resident Face Sheet dated 9/23/22 documents R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia with behavioral disturbance, altered mental status, and chronic kidney disease. R15's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/15/22 documents R15 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 00, which indicates a severe cognitive impairment. R15's Event Report dated 1/14/22 documents under progress note, 1/17/22 2:55 PM Rocephin 1 gm (gram) IM (intramuscular) x (times) 1 dose given 1/14/21 et (and) Augmentin po (by mouth) BID (twice daily) x 10 days cont (continue) as ordered with no ADR's (Adverse Reactions) noted for URI (upper respiratory infection) et UTI (urinary tract infection). Moist nonproductive cough cont, Lungs diminished bilat, (bilaterally), resp E/U (respirations even and unlabored). O2 @ 1 L per NC (oxygen at 1 liter per nasal cannula) as res tol/allows (resident tolerates) PO flds (fluids) encouraged. Res is more alert et talking this AM. Res easily agitated per res norm. The event report continues to document on 1/18/22 3:07 PM Augmentin po BID x 10 days cont as ordered with no ADR's noted for URI et UTI. Moist nonproductive cough cont, Lungs diminished bilat, Resp E/U. Ox Sats (saturations) WNL (within normal limits) RA (room air). PO flds encouraged. Res is more alert et talkative this am. Res easily agitated per res norm. The facility provided an untitled piece of paper with R15's name and date of 1/14/22 written at the top with a typed urinalysis report documented at the bottom of the paper that includes 2 plus leukocytes, and 3 plus ketones. R15's urinalysis dated 1/14/22 from the local lab documents negative for leukocytes, nitrites, ketones, and normal protein. This same urinalysis documents 1-5 white blood count, squamous cells, epithelial cells, and hyaline cast. Hand written at the bottom of the urinalysis is documented, Recently given Rocephin and started on Augmentin 875mg/125 mg (milligrams) PO BID x 10 days. On 9/21/22 at 3:00 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated, on 1/14/22, R15 had an elevated temperature of 102.0 degrees Fahrenheit. V2 stated they did an in-house urinalysis that documented 2 plus leukocytes. When asked what the culture and sensitivity documented, V2 stated the urine was not sent for a sensitivity. When asked how they knew which antibiotic would be effective if no culture and sensitivity was done, V2 stated he goes by most up to date recommendations. V2 stated if someone has a positive urinalysis, he starts them on an antibiotic they are not allergic to. V2 stated the lab only comes to the facility weekly and he isn't going to make the residents wait a whole week for treatment. When asked about the culture for the urinalysis that was done at the local lab V2 stated I don't know why it's not on there. The facility was not able to provide reproducible evidence a culture and sensitivity was done for R15.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to mitigate the risk for infection by allowing foley cath...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to mitigate the risk for infection by allowing foley catheter tubing and collection bags to touch the ground and failed to perform hand hygiene per current standards of practice while administering treatments for 4 of 4 (R10, R11, R15, and R31) residents reviewed for infection control out of a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. R10's face sheet documented an initial admission date of 12/3/2019. R10's face sheet documented diagnoses included: urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, retention of urine, uninhibited neurogenic bladder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. On 9/20/22 at 11:10 AM, on 9/21/22 at 10:03 AM, and on 9/21/22 at 3:19 PM, R10 was observed sitting in a recliner in R10's room. R10's foley catheter was hanging from the footrest bar with the foley catheter collection bag was touching the floor. On 9/21/22 at 11:34 AM, R10 was observed sitting in the dining room. R10's foley catheter tubing was coming out of the bottom of R10's pant leg and was lying on the floor. On 9/21/22 at 1:04 PM R10 was sitting in the dining room with R10's foley catheter tubing on the floor with R10's shoe on top of it. 2. R31's face sheet documented an admission date of 6/24/2016. R31's face sheet documented diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease, hematuria, retention of urine, obstructive and reflux uropathy, uninhibited neuropathic bladder, and personal history of urinary infections. On 9/20/22 at 11:30 AM and on 9/21/22 at 10:02 AM, R31 was lying in bed with R31's foley catheter collection bag hanging from the bed frame with the bottom of the bag touching the floor. On 9/23/22 at 10:31 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON)/ Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) said catheter tubing and collection bags should never be touching the floor for infection control purposes. V2 said the facility did not have a policy stating catheter tubing and collection bags should not touch the ground. 3. R11's Resident Face Sheet dated 9/23/22 documents R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, hypertension, anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia, and muscle weakness. R11's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/22/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 09, which indicates R11 has a moderate cognitive impairment. R11's Physician Order Report dated 9/1/22 to 9/23/22 documents the following physician orders; 1. clean left knee abrasion with soap and water, apply triple antibiotic ointment and leave open to air, 2. clean abrasion to left shin with soap and water, rinse, pat dry, apply very thin layer of triple antibiotic ointment, then collagen powder, cover with dry dressing daily and as needed, 3. clean shearing left hip with soap and water, rinse, pat dry, apply very thin layer of triple antibiotic ointment, then collagen powder, cover with dry dressing, change daily and as needed, 4. clean left palm with soap and water, rinse, pat dry, apply sure prep and let dry, then apply palm roll for maintenance. On 9/22/22 at 11:00 AM, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was observed, with V2 (DON) present, administering treatments to R11. V3 administered the treatment to R1's left palm, left hip, left knee, and left shin as ordered by the physician. V3 changed her gloves per current standards of practice while administering the treatments. V3 did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes. 4. R15's Resident Face Sheet dated 9/23/22 documents R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, muscle weakness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R15's MDS dated [DATE] documents R15 has a BIMS score of 00, which indicates R15 has a severe cognitive impairment. R15's Physician Order Report dated 9/1/22 to 9/23/22 documents a physician order to clean left hip with soap and water, rinse, pat dry, apply zinc for maintenance and leave open to air. On 9/22/22 at 11:30 AM, V3 (LPN) was observed, with V2 (DON) present, administering treatment to R15's left hip. V3 changed her gloves per current standards of practice but did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes. On 9/22/22 at 11:30 AM, V3 (LPN) stated she had not hand sanitized or washed her hands between glove changes. V3 stated she normally does but forgot to take it with her. On this same day at this same time, V2 (DON) stated he would expect staff to hand sanitize between glove changes.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $98,504 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 12 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $98,504 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (36/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 36/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Hillview Senior Living & Rehab's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Hillview Senior Living & Rehab Staffed?

CMS rates HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Hillview Senior Living & Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB during 2022 to 2023. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Hillview Senior Living & Rehab?

HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 50 certified beds and approximately 41 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in VIENNA, Illinois.

How Does Hillview Senior Living & Rehab Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hillview Senior Living & Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Hillview Senior Living & Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Hillview Senior Living & Rehab Stick Around?

HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Hillview Senior Living & Rehab Ever Fined?

HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB has been fined $98,504 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Illinois average of $34,064. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Hillview Senior Living & Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

HILLVIEW SENIOR LIVING & REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.