SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Serenity Spring Senior Living at Jasonville has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families seeking care. Ranked #186 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, it falls in the top half, but it is the second-best option in Greene County, with only one other facility available locally. The facility's trend is stable, with a consistent number of issues reported in the last two years. Staffing is rated average with a 3 out of 5 stars, and the turnover rate is 48%, which is similar to the state average. Notably, the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a positive sign. However, there are some concerning incidents noted during inspections. For example, expired food was found in the kitchen, including sour cream and buttermilk, which should have been discarded. Additionally, oxygen delivery systems for several residents were not labeled or dated, which does not meet professional standards. Overall, while there are strengths in the facility's performance, these issues highlight areas that need improvement for the safety and well-being of residents.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Indiana
- #186/505
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 27 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Indiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Indiana avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 13 residents reviewed for accuracy of the MDS assessments. (Resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Oxygen tubing was not labeled with a date or docum...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. Expired foods were not discarded and food was no...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the written notification required for a transfer and dischar...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the notification of the bed-hold policy required for a resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner for 3 of 3 observations of the kitchen. Pre-prepared beverages and f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented a fall care plan intervention for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 2 residents reviewed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards and the plan of care for 5 of 6 residents reviewed. Oxygen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Indiana.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville Staffed?
CMS rates SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville?
State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 8 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville?
SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 41 residents (about 68% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in JASONVILLE, Indiana.
How Does Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville Stick Around?
SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville Ever Fined?
SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Serenity Spring Senior Living At Jasonville on Any Federal Watch List?
SERENITY SPRING SENIOR LIVING AT JASONVILLE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.