NORTH WOODS VILLAGE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
North Woods Village in Kokomo, Indiana has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and in the middle of the pack compared to other facilities. It ranks #273 out of 505 in Indiana, placing it in the bottom half, but it is #3 out of 7 in Howard County, indicating only two local options are better. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 7 in 2024 to 3 in 2025. However, it has a staffing rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is poor, even though the turnover rate of 35% is better than the state average of 47%. The facility has concerning fines of $24,291, which are higher than 86% of Indiana facilities, and it has less RN coverage than 81% of state facilities. While the facility has excellent quality measures, there are serious concerns regarding safety. A critical incident involved a resident sustaining 14 severe first-degree burns due to staff-to-resident physical abuse. Additionally, there were issues with medication management, such as not holding a blood pressure medication when needed, and a resident not receiving the correct oxygen flow rate due to a portable tank being set incorrectly. Overall, while there are some strengths, families should weigh these significant safety concerns when considering this nursing home.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Indiana
- #273/505
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 35% turnover. Near Indiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $24,291 in fines. Lower than most Indiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Indiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (35%)
13 points below Indiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Indiana average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
11pts below Indiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication for blood pressure was held according to the physician's ordered parameters for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for quality of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a portable oxygen tank was turned on to administer the correct flow rate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore gloves when touching a resident's medication for 1 of 9 residents observed for medication administration. (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a psychotic disturbance and the start of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0642
(Tag F0642)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to correctly code an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Record Review (PASA...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen was on the correct liter flow per the physician's orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respira...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0744
(Tag F0744)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were documenting resident behaviors, implementing and documenting nonpharmacological interventions for behaviors...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were free of loose pills and opened medications were dated for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for m...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store clean clothing or resident personal care items ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident B was free from staff-to-resident physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient pract...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete weekly weights as recommended by the Registered Dietician (RD) and to complete a weight for a resident with a known n...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 35% turnover. Below Indiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 11 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $24,291 in fines. Higher than 94% of Indiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade C (56/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is North Woods Village's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns NORTH WOODS VILLAGE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is North Woods Village Staffed?
CMS rates NORTH WOODS VILLAGE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 35%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 59%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at North Woods Village?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at NORTH WOODS VILLAGE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates North Woods Village?
NORTH WOODS VILLAGE is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility is operated by AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 164 certified beds and approximately 103 residents (about 63% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in KOKOMO, Indiana.
How Does North Woods Village Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, NORTH WOODS VILLAGE's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (35%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting North Woods Village?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is North Woods Village Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, NORTH WOODS VILLAGE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at North Woods Village Stick Around?
NORTH WOODS VILLAGE has a staff turnover rate of 35%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was North Woods Village Ever Fined?
NORTH WOODS VILLAGE has been fined $24,291 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Indiana average of $33,322. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is North Woods Village on Any Federal Watch List?
NORTH WOODS VILLAGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.