BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Care Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns about care quality. They rank #330 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing them in the bottom half, and #15 out of 18 in St. Joseph County, meaning there are very few better options nearby. However, the facility's trend is improving, having reduced issues from 16 in 2024 to 9 in 2025. Staffing is a concern, with a 51% turnover rate, which is average for Indiana, and less RN coverage than 77% of state facilities, meaning residents may not receive the attentive care they need. Additionally, the facility has incurred $14,886 in fines, which is higher than 84% of Indiana facilities, pointing to possible ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents reported include a failure to provide safe transfers for residents, leading to potential injury, and delays in carrying out physician orders, resulting in hospitalization for one resident. Overall, while there are improvements and some average care measures, families should weigh these concerns carefully when considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Indiana
- #330/505
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $14,886 in fines. Lower than most Indiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Indiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 45 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Indiana average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Indiana avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 45 deficiencies on record
May 2025
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician of a resident's new pain for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident 49)
Finding includes:
During a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice Form (SNF-ABN) was provided timely following the end of Medicare skilled serv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an individualized plan of care was created for a resident with an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit for 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to update a care plan with interventions put into place after a fall for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls. (Resident 2)
Finding...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a Physician's order related to providing nutritional supplements for 1 of 1 resident who was reviewed for nutrition. (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to notify the address a resident's pain timely and effectively for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident 49)
Finding incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing Foley catheter (indwelling urinary catheter) care for 1 of 4 resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman in a timely manner of resident discharges for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for discharges. (Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for 7 of 19 ro...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
14 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were made aware of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to a hospital for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitaliz...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide nail care for dependent residents for 3 of 5 residents who were reviewed for activities of daily living needs. (Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a catheter was anchored to prevent excessive tension on the catheter for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders regarding tube feeding orders were followed for 1 of 1 residents with tube feeding. (Resident 53)
Fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders regarding dressing changes were followed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for intravenous fluids. (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure reconciliation of controlled drugs was completed for 3 of 3 carts reviewed for narcotic counts. (B-Wing Hall 1 medication cart, C-Wing ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and observation the facility failed to properly store medications in 1 of 3 carts reviewed for storage. (C-Wing Hall 1 medication cart)
Finding includes:
1. During an observation of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to dispose of leftovers timely in the walk-in cooler of the kitchen. This had the possibility to affect 2 of 2 resident with alte...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practice was maintained regarding glove use and hand washing during a sterile procedure for 1 of 1 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document declination forms for COVID immunizations for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Residents 1, 3, & 24)
Finding includes...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a temperature log for a resident's personal refrigerator for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for personal refrigerators. (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were responded to promptly and acted upon for 4 of 21 residents reviewed for grievances. (Residents 52, 30, 70 & ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 of 17 residents wh...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director or his designee attended the quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting during the p...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's abnormal vital signs were reported to the physi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to reassess a resident after a change in condition, for 1 of 3 residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred, via a Hoyer lift (a resident lif...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
16 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified environment when conducting an interview for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 176)
Finding includes:
Du...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide choices for care for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for showering. (Resident 176)
Finding includes:
During an interview on 6/27/2023 at 9...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0570
(Tag F0570)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Surety Bond amount was sufficient to cover the Resident's personal fund account daily. This deficient practice had the potential...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to inform a physician of a significant weight loss for 2 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report to state agencies an injury of unknown source for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for injury of unknown source. (Resident 15)
Finding incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop person-centered care plans related to mood, behaviors, and activities for 3 of 29 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update/revise care plans related to falls, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), and significant weight loss for 3 o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide dressing tasks for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activity of daily living. (Resident 16)
Finding includes:
During an ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a fractured humerus was mobilized in a sling per the physician order, and notify the physician of the resident's ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during the care of a pressure ulcer to prevent the spread of infection for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and implement infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 2 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored and maintained per physicians orders and standard of practice for 1 of 1 residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage in the facility.
Finding includes:
The PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) staffing data report dated Janu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication room was locked when not in use for 1of 1 medication rooms randomly observed. (Hall 100 medication room)
F...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items in the freezer were dated/labeled and sealed securely after opening and to ensure cooking utensils, skillets...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe mechanically lifted transfer to prevent a major injury (Resident C), and safe activities of daily living (ADL)...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were carried out in a timely manner for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent burns from hot liquids by serving it at an inappropriate temperature resulting in a partial thickness to full thickness burn.(Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 45 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $14,886 in fines. Above average for Indiana. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Staffed?
CMS rates BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview?
State health inspectors documented 45 deficiencies at BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 42 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview?
BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 130 certified beds and approximately 77 residents (about 59% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MISHAWAKA, Indiana.
How Does Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Stick Around?
BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview Ever Fined?
BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER has been fined $14,886 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Indiana average of $33,228. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Brickyard Healthcare - Fountainview on Any Federal Watch List?
BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE - FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.