MEADOW LAKES
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Meadow Lakes in Mooresville, Indiana, has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average compared to other facilities. It ranks #70 out of 505 in the state, placing it in the top half of Indiana nursing homes, and #2 out of 6 in Morgan County, indicating it is one of the better local options. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 5 in 2024 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is a concern, as it received a 2 out of 5 stars rating, with a 41% turnover rate, which is better than the state average but still indicates some instability. Notably, there were incidents where residents with dementia were not adequately monitored, leading to a serious fall and a fracture, as well as missing documentation for transfers to the hospital, which could affect communication with families. Overall, while there are strengths like good quality measures and no fines, families should be aware of the staffing issues and specific incidents that reflect areas needing improvement.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Indiana
- #70/505
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 41% turnover. Near Indiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Indiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (41%)
7 points below Indiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Indiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self-medication administration assessment was completed for 1 of 1 random observations of medications left at the be...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set assessment for a resident determined to have a Level II PASARR and a serious mental illness for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the comprehensive care plan for a resident with significant weight loss for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) for a dependent resident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for ADL's. A resident was n...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate assistance to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (CNA in Training 1, Resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary drainage bag was positioned off the floor to prevent infections for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary ca...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. On 5/29/24 at 11:50 a.m., Resident 90's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, sepsis and vascular dementia.
Resident 90's progress notes indicated the resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0744
(Tag F0744)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to residents with dementia to prevent resident-to-resident altercations for 2 of 3 residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Staff administered another resident's medication ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Indiana.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- • 41% turnover. Below Indiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 9 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Meadow Lakes's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MEADOW LAKES an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Meadow Lakes Staffed?
CMS rates MEADOW LAKES's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Meadow Lakes?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at MEADOW LAKES during 2024 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 8 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Meadow Lakes?
MEADOW LAKES is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 137 certified beds and approximately 122 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MOORESVILLE, Indiana.
How Does Meadow Lakes Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, MEADOW LAKES's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Meadow Lakes?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Meadow Lakes Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MEADOW LAKES has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Meadow Lakes Stick Around?
MEADOW LAKES has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Meadow Lakes Ever Fined?
MEADOW LAKES has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Meadow Lakes on Any Federal Watch List?
MEADOW LAKES is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.