HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Holy Cross Village at Notre Dame Inc has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is considered decent and slightly above average. In terms of rankings, it is #255 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing it in the bottom half, and #9 out of 18 in St. Joseph County, indicating only one local option is better. The facility is improving, as it went from 7 issues in 2024 to none in 2025. Staffing is a concern, as it received a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars, but the turnover rate of 28% is good compared to the state average of 47%. On the positive side, there have been no fines, which is encouraging, and there is more RN coverage than many other facilities, helping to ensure quality care. However, there have been incidents, including a serious issue where a resident was improperly transferred, resulting in a fracture, and concerns about expired food in the kitchen and a failure to report an allegation of abuse, highlighting areas that need attention.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Indiana
- #255/505
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Indiana's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Low Staff Turnover (28%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (28%)
20 points below Indiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Indiana average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff transferred a dependent resident with a mechanical lift in accordance with physician orders and the plan of care ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident C).
Finding includes:
On 6/26/2024 at 1:30 P.M., a record r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for an anti-anxiety medication for 1 of 15 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 8)
Finding includes:
A re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the development of pressure areas for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure areas. (Resident 9)
Finding includes:
Du...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care, for 1 of 2 residents who were reviewed for urinary incontinence. (Resident 9)
Finding includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication storage areas were free of expired medications, expired glucose testing solution, failed to ensure medicati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
2. During an observation of the kitchen, on 3/19/2024, at 9:45 A.M. with the Regional Manager, there was an expired container of cottage cheese observed in the walk in cooler with a discard date of 3/...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate clothing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 32)
Finding includes:
During an observation on...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide showers per the resident's choice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for preferences. (Resident 6)
Finding includes:
During an in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update the plan of care for 2 of 17 residents reviewed for care planning. (Residents 32 & 24)
Findings include:
1. A clinical ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received showers/bathing twice a week...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. A clinical record review for Resident 32 was completed on 2/22/2023 at 11:05 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: pulmonary embolism, dementia, diabetes mellitus type 2, and chronic ki...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. During an observation on 2/20/2023 at 10:25 A.M., Resident 35's C-PAP mask was observed to be lying on the bed.
On 2/21/2023 at 32:39 A.M., Resident 35's C-PAP mask and oxygen nasal cannula were ly...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide sanitary food service in 1 of 2 dining rooms residents observed for food delivery service. (main dining room)
Findings include:
1. On...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- • 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Indiana's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc Staffed?
CMS rates HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 28%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 13 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc?
HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 52 certified beds and approximately 46 residents (about 88% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in NOTRE DAME, Indiana.
How Does Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (28%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc Stick Around?
Staff at HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 28%, the facility is 18 percentage points below the Indiana average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc Ever Fined?
HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Holy Cross Village At Notre Dame Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
HOLY CROSS VILLAGE AT NOTRE DAME INC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.