BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Blair Ridge Health Campus has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families looking for care. It ranks #124 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among the four facilities in Miami County. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from nine in 2022 to six in 2024. Staffing is a strength here with a 4 out of 5 rating and a turnover rate of 30%, significantly lower than the state average. Notably, there have been no fines, which is a positive sign. However, there are some weaknesses to consider. An incident was reported where a resident developed a pressure ulcer due to insufficient assessment upon admission. Another concern involved food safety practices in the kitchen, where yogurt was found at unsafe temperatures. Additionally, there was a lack of a care plan for a resident's oxygen needs, which could have serious implications. Overall, while there are notable strengths in staffing and safety, families should be aware of the need for improvement in specific areas of care and facility management.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Indiana
- #124/505
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 30% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 18 points below Indiana's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 47 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Indiana. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (30%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (30%)
18 points below Indiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a transfer and discharge form for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 36)
Finding includes:
Durin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents received a PASRR(Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) assessment in a timely manner. (Resident 40)
Finding i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming services for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Residents 27 and 29)
Findings includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line dressing changes for 1 of 1 resident re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented related to lack of handwashing after glove removal during a blood g...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under safe and sanitary conditions related to appropriate cold food temperatures,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2022
9 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper admission assessment and orders were obt...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. A clinical record review was completed, on 3/16/2022 at 11:02 A.M., and indicated Resident 15's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, pneumonitis due to inhalation of fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for a preventative boot which resulted in a skin issue for 1 of 21 residents whose physician orders we...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy equipment per Physician Orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 30 & 43)
F...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0744
(Tag F0744)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received person centered dementia care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident 6)
Finding includes:
A ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that as needed (PRN) antianxiety medications are only scheduled for 14 days and /or provide documentation the practitioner reevaluat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and date dry storage goods for 1 of 1 storage rooms reviewed for food storage.
Finding includes:
During a tour of the dry storage facil...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. A clinical record review was completed on 3/17/2022 at 11:19 A.M. Resident 244's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diastolic (congestive) heart failure, pleural effusion, acute respirato...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a treatment supply cart and medication cart wer...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Indiana facilities.
- • 30% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 18 points below Indiana's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 15 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Blair Ridge Health Campus's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Blair Ridge Health Campus Staffed?
CMS rates BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 30%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Blair Ridge Health Campus?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Blair Ridge Health Campus?
BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 55 certified beds and approximately 49 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in PERU, Indiana.
How Does Blair Ridge Health Campus Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (30%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Blair Ridge Health Campus?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Blair Ridge Health Campus Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Blair Ridge Health Campus Stick Around?
Staff at BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 30%, the facility is 16 percentage points below the Indiana average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 14%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Blair Ridge Health Campus Ever Fined?
BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Blair Ridge Health Campus on Any Federal Watch List?
BLAIR RIDGE HEALTH CAMPUS is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.