MILLER'S MERRY MANOR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Miller's Merry Manor in Walkerton, Indiana has a Trust Grade of B, which indicates it is a good choice for families considering nursing homes. It ranks #74 out of 505 facilities in Indiana, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 18 in St. Joseph County, meaning there is only one better local option. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from 14 in 2022 to 7 in 2024. Staffing is average with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 36%, which is lower than the state average of 47%, suggesting that staff members tend to stay longer. However, the facility has $3,250 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 78% of Indiana facilities, indicating potential compliance issues. Additionally, the nursing home has average RN coverage, which means residents receive care from registered nurses, but not in above-average amounts. Specific incidents noted in inspections include the failure to develop a care plan for a resident with depression and not updating a fall care plan after a resident's fall, which raises concerns about individualized care. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing stability and a solid trust grade, the facility does need to address compliance issues and ensure thorough care planning for residents.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Indiana
- #76/505
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 36% turnover. Near Indiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $3,250 in fines. Higher than 58% of Indiana facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 39 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Indiana. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (36%)
12 points below Indiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Indiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 21 deficiencies on record
Jan 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with depression for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan development. (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a fall care plan with a new interventions after a fall for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for falls. (Resident 27)
Finding includes:
Dur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. During an observation on 1/8/2024 at 1:45 P.M., Resident 10 was in bed and was not wearing heel protector boots on either foot.
Resident 10's record review was completed on 1/9/2024 at 10:24 A.M. D...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement measures to prevent pressure areas for 1 of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an oxygen humidification bottles were changed weekly for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen use. (Resident 2)
Fi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to limit use of an as needed anti-anxiety medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 3)
Finding includes...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow general Infection Control Practices during incontinence care and a pressure ulcer treatment for 1 of 1 residents revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
14 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bowel incontinence was thoroughly assessed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for incontinence. (Resident 24)
Finding includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. A clinical review was completed on 11/16/2022 at 11:00 A.M., for resident 6, diagnoses included, but not limited to: chronic ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised for 1 out of 13 residents reviewed for care plan revision. (Resident 6)
Finding includes:
A cl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure insulin is administered at an appropriate time after obtaining a blood sugar.
Finding includes:
During an observation o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for heel protectors. (Resident 6)
Finding includes:
A cli...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for incontinence had interventions to restore as much continence as was possible and prevent...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure signage was posted on the resident doors that oxygen is in use, that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and neb...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded timely to pharmacy reco...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate diagnosis for an antipsychotic medication for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) was carried out per their policy.
Finding includes:
On 11/21/2022 at 10:30...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) was carried out per their policy.
Finding includes:
On 11/21/2022 at 10:30...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure gloves were worn during administration of subcutaneous injection of insulin and glucometer was disinfected after use fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff were fully vaccinated for COVID 19 except for those staff having a granted exemptions. This deficient practice included 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0865
(Tag F0865)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) was carried out per their policy.
Finding includes:
On 11/21/2022 at 10:30...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • $3,250 in fines. Lower than most Indiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
- • 36% turnover. Below Indiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Miller'S Merry Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MILLER'S MERRY MANOR an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Indiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Miller'S Merry Manor Staffed?
CMS rates MILLER'S MERRY MANOR's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Indiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Miller'S Merry Manor?
State health inspectors documented 21 deficiencies at MILLER'S MERRY MANOR during 2022 to 2024. These included: 21 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Miller'S Merry Manor?
MILLER'S MERRY MANOR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MILLER'S MERRY MANOR, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 107 certified beds and approximately 46 residents (about 43% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WALKERTON, Indiana.
How Does Miller'S Merry Manor Compare to Other Indiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Indiana, MILLER'S MERRY MANOR's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (36%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Miller'S Merry Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Miller'S Merry Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MILLER'S MERRY MANOR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Indiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Miller'S Merry Manor Stick Around?
MILLER'S MERRY MANOR has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Indiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Miller'S Merry Manor Ever Fined?
MILLER'S MERRY MANOR has been fined $3,250 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Indiana average of $33,111. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Miller'S Merry Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
MILLER'S MERRY MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.