Colonial Manor of Amana
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Colonial Manor of Amana has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and performs well compared to other nursing homes. It ranks #13 out of 392 facilities in Iowa, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among four homes in Iowa County. The facility is improving, having reduced its number of concerns from two in 2024 to none in 2025. Staffing is average with a rating of 3 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 46%, which aligns closely with the state average. Notably, there have been no fines, which is a positive sign of compliance. However, there are some weaknesses to consider. The inspector found that staff failed to properly assess and intervene after a resident experienced a fall, which raises concerns about responsiveness to changes in resident health. Additionally, there was an incident where a staff member did not use a gait belt as required during a transfer, which could increase the risk of injury. Another resident did not receive complete care following an incontinence episode, risking hygiene issues. Overall, while Colonial Manor has strong attributes, families should remain aware of these areas needing improvement.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Iowa
- #13/392
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 45 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Iowa. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ✓ Good
- Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Iowa avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record
Apr 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to further assess and intervene after a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized a gait belt in accordance with the care plan for 1 of 3 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide complete perineal (groin and bottom) cares in a way to prevent contamination following ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Iowa.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
- • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Colonial Manor Of Amana's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Colonial Manor of Amana an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Iowa, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Colonial Manor Of Amana Staffed?
CMS rates Colonial Manor of Amana's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the Iowa average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 62%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Colonial Manor Of Amana?
State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at Colonial Manor of Amana during 2023 to 2024. These included: 3 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Colonial Manor Of Amana?
Colonial Manor of Amana is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 50 certified beds and approximately 42 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Amana, Iowa.
How Does Colonial Manor Of Amana Compare to Other Iowa Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Iowa, Colonial Manor of Amana's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Colonial Manor Of Amana?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Colonial Manor Of Amana Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Colonial Manor of Amana has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Iowa. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Colonial Manor Of Amana Stick Around?
Colonial Manor of Amana has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for Iowa nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Colonial Manor Of Amana Ever Fined?
Colonial Manor of Amana has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Colonial Manor Of Amana on Any Federal Watch List?
Colonial Manor of Amana is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.