Ennoble Nursing and Rehab

2000 Pasadena Drive, Dubuque, IA 52001 (563) 557-1076
For profit - Limited Liability company 85 Beds SHLOMO HOFFMAN Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#21 of 392 in IA
Last Inspection: June 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Ennoble Nursing and Rehab in Dubuque, Iowa has received a Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and offers excellent care. It ranks #21 out of 392 facilities in Iowa, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 12 in Dubuque County, meaning only two local options are better. The facility shows an improving trend, having reduced issues from 2 in 2024 to none in 2025. Staffing is rated average at 3 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 48%, which is close to the state average. While there have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign, the facility has less RN coverage than 84% of Iowa facilities, which could affect resident care. Specific incidents noted during inspections included staff failing to knock before entering residents' rooms, which violated privacy, and not properly covering laundry, exposing personal items and not following protocol for handling soiled linens. Overall, while there are some concerns, the facility's strengths in care quality and no fines are noteworthy for families considering this nursing home.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Iowa
#21/392
Top 5%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 30 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Iowa. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 2 issues
2025: 0 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 48%

Near Iowa avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Chain: SHLOMO HOFFMAN

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

Jul 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident, family, and staff interviews the facility staff failed to knock and be acknowledged before enter...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident, family, and staff interviews the facility staff failed to knock and be acknowledged before entering a resident's room for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #5, #17, #33 and#39). Facility reported census of 61 residents. Findings include: Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognitive response. The MDS documented Resident #17 as independent (Resident completes the activity by themselves with no assistance from a helper for self-care). The MDS listed diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, coronary artery disease, and hypertension. During an interview on 07/15/24 at 11:02 AM, Resident #17 reported she was getting dressed one time and the staff just walked in. Resident #17 voiced she would like them to knock before entering. On 07/16/24 at 7:23 AM, observed Staff C (housekeeper) enter room D1 without knocking. Resident #17 and Resident #39 were present in the room. On 07/16/24 at 7:39 AM, observed Staff C enter room R15 without knocking. Resident #5 was present in the room. On 7/17/24 at 9:00 AM, observed Staff C enter room R17 without knocking. Resident #33 was present in the room. On 7/17/24 at 9:02 AM, observed Staff C enter room R13 without knocking. Resident #1 was present in the room. During review of personnel records on 07/17/24 at 9:34 AM, page 3 of Staff C's position description indicated she should knock before entering a resident's room. Staff C signed the position description on 06/14/23. An updated position description was provided to Staff C documenting the resident rights functions and knock before entering a resident's room. Staff C signed the position description on 03/20/24. During an interview on 07/17/24 at 10:24 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported staff were to knock on the door and identify themselves prior to entering a resident room. Training on resident rights was provided upon hire and annually. During an interview on 07/17/24 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator reported resident rights training was provided on 09/24/23. Staff C was in attendance for the training. Resident privacy and confidentiality were discussed in the facility policy. During an interview on 07/17/24 at 1:35 PM, Staff C reported staff were to knock and identify themselves before entering a resident room.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. In an observation on 7/17/24 from 8:32-8:44 AM Staff D, Housekeeper wheeled laundry down the hall and began to distribute it....

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. In an observation on 7/17/24 from 8:32-8:44 AM Staff D, Housekeeper wheeled laundry down the hall and began to distribute it. Only the top shelf of the cart was covered with a sheet. Personal items were exposed on the lower two shelves with resident names visible. This was observed again at 12:45 PM. In an observation on 7/17/24 at 9:42 AM Staff D wore gloves and failed to wear a gown when she took linens and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) gowns from a bin and placed them in the washing machine. In an interview on 7/17/24 at 8:11 AM the Environmental Services Supervisor (ESS) explained laundry staff gown up just when washing items coming from isolation rooms. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 12:30 PM the ESS explained she was not aware gown and gloves must be worn for all dirty laundry. She was aware that the laundry cart needed to be completely covered when transporting clean linens. The policy titled Standard Precautions, revised September 2022 instructed staff: linen soiled with blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions are handled and processed in a manner that prevents skin and mucous membrane exposures, contamination of clothing, and avoids transfer of microorganisms to other residents and environments. The policy titled Laundry Management, dated 1/01/2021 instructed staff: clean linen must be transported from the laundry to the clinical area on a clean covered cart. The policy failed to indicate the need for a gown when handling all dirty linens. Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to keep Foley catheter and tubing off the ground to maintain infection control for 1 out of 2 catheters reviewed (Resident #28). The facility also failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment when handling dirty linens and failed to properly cover linens when transporting. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #28 as mildly cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 12 out of 15. The MDS listed the following diagnoses Anemia, Renal Insufficiency, and Neurogenic Bladder. It also identified Resident #28 required total assist of staff with personal hygiene, bathing, and toileting. The MDS indicated the resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of the final urine culture dated 6/16/24 indicated Resident #28 had a urinary tract infection and was started on Keflex (antibiotic) 500 milligram three times a day for seven days. Review of the Care Plan with a date initiated 6/20/24 indicated Resident #28 had an indwelling Foley catheter. The interventions directed staff to check tubing for kinks, position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder, monitor and report to medical doctor for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection. The Care Plan failed to address placement of tubing or Foley bag from touching the ground/floor. On 07/15/24 at 11:57 AM observed Staff pushing Resident #28 down the center hall in her wheelchair. The Foley catheter tubing and bag were touching the ground. The catheter bag had a privacy cover on it. On 07/15/24 at 12:25 PM observed Resident #28 in her wheelchair in the assisted dining room her Foley catheter bag on the ground and tubing was touching the ground under her wheelchair. On 07/16/24 at 7:55 AM Resident #28 observed sitting in her wheelchair in the assisted dining room catheter bag under the wheelchair resting on the ground and tubing on the ground. On 07/16/24 at 9:44 AM Resident #28 observed sitting in wheelchair in her room the catheter bag with privacy bag resting on the ground with tubing touching the ground. On 07/17/24 at 12:25 PM Resident #28 sitting in her wheelchair at the table in the dining room. Catheter tubing was lying on the ground below the chair. On 07/18/24 at 07:55 AM Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated the Foley bag and tubing should all be kept down below the level of the bladder. The catheter bag should be in the dignity bag underneath the wheelchair and it should not be touching the ground. The tubing should be looped and in the bag clipped up under the wheelchair and when in the bed the tubing should be clipped and secured so it does not touch the ground. On 07/18/24 07:58 AM Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated for a Foley catheter the tubing should be twisted up and off the floor and the bag should be off the floor. The tubing should never be kinked and kept below the bladder with the dignity bag covering it and make sure the tubing is off the floor. On 07/18/24 at 8:02 AM the Director of Nursing stated she would expect the Foley catheter bag to be kept inside the dignity bag unless they are in bed. The tubing should be off the ground and the tubing should be coiled up and in the dignity bag. When they are in bed laying down it should be beside down them and off the ground. The facility provided a policy titled Emptying a Urinary Drainage Bag with a revised date October 2010 which directed staff to keep the drainage bag and tubing off the floor at all times to prevent contamination and damage.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Iowa.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Ennoble Nursing And Rehab's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Ennoble Nursing and Rehab an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Iowa, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Ennoble Nursing And Rehab Staffed?

CMS rates Ennoble Nursing and Rehab's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the Iowa average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Ennoble Nursing And Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at Ennoble Nursing and Rehab during 2024. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Ennoble Nursing And Rehab?

Ennoble Nursing and Rehab is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SHLOMO HOFFMAN, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 85 certified beds and approximately 68 residents (about 80% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Dubuque, Iowa.

How Does Ennoble Nursing And Rehab Compare to Other Iowa Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Iowa, Ennoble Nursing and Rehab's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Ennoble Nursing And Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Ennoble Nursing And Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Ennoble Nursing and Rehab has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Iowa. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Ennoble Nursing And Rehab Stick Around?

Ennoble Nursing and Rehab has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for Iowa nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Ennoble Nursing And Rehab Ever Fined?

Ennoble Nursing and Rehab has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Ennoble Nursing And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

Ennoble Nursing and Rehab is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.