Kanawha Community Home, INC.

130 West Sixth Street, Kanawha, IA 50447 (641) 762-3302
For profit - Corporation 26 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
93/100
#40 of 392 in IA
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Kanawha Community Home, INC. has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended for families looking for quality care. It ranks #40 out of 392 facilities in Iowa, placing it in the top half of the state, and is the best option among three local facilities in Hancock County. The facility is improving, with reported issues decreasing from four in 2023 to none in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, boasting a 5/5 rating and a low turnover rate of 28%, significantly better than the state average, plus more RN coverage than 96% of Iowa facilities, which ensures residents receive attentive care. However, there have been some concerns, such as improper food storage practices and failing to notify the State Ombudsman about a resident's hospital transfer, which could impact residents' safety and communication.

Trust Score
A
93/100
In Iowa
#40/392
Top 10%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
3 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Iowa's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 78 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Iowa nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 3 issues
2024: 0 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Low Staff Turnover (28%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (28%)

    20 points below Iowa average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Iowa's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

Jul 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman when a resident transferred and admitted to the hospital for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospit...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman when a resident transferred and admitted to the hospital for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 18 residents. Findings include: The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #7 dated 2/11/23 documented the resident discharged to the hospital 2/11/23. The clinical record census documented Resident #7 went on hospital leave 2/11/23 and returned to the facility 2/14/23. Review of facility form titled, Notice of Transfer Form to Long Term Care Ombudsman emailed 3/24/23 revealed Resident #7's name was not on the list of residents that transferred from the facility in February 2023. During an interview on 7/26/23 at 3:40 PM the Director of Nursing acknowledged Resident # 7's name had not been added to the list to notify the Ombudsman of the residents transfer to the hospital in February 2023 as expected.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer a resident to the appropriate sta...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer a resident to the appropriate state-designated authority for a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after the resident was identified to have a mental health diagnosis for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PASRR evaluation (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 18 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 indicating severely impaired cognition and diagnoses including anxiety, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The MDS further documented the resident received an antidepressant medication for 7 out of the past 7 days. The Care Plan for Resident #10 with a target date 10/3/23, revealed the resident had the potential for behavior disturbance. The Care Plan directed staff to intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others. During an observation 7/24/23 at 11:10 AM, Resident #10 requested staff not leave her during an introduction by the writer. Clinical record review revealed Resident #10 had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) dated 10/26/21. Review of the Level 1 PASRR completed by Ascend for Resident #10 dated 11/4/21 documented the resident had mental health diagnoses including major depressive disorder, anxiety and depression/depressive disorder and there were no indicators identified that would signify the need for further evaluation at the time. The Level 1 evaluation further documented that if there was a discrepancy in the reported information a status change should be submitted to Ascend for further evaluation. The Level 1 PASRR lacked the diagnoses of PTSD. During an interviewon 7/26/23 at 7:52 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged a Level II PASRR had not been completed for Resident #10 regarding her Post Traumatic Stress Disorder diagnosis. The DON further revealed the facility does not have a policy or protocol in place regarding completion of PASSR's.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility reported a census of 18 residents. Findings include: During the initial kitchen visit on 7/24/23 at 9:43 AM, the following observations were made: Bowls and plates were stored on a cart face up and not covered. Three rubber spatulas were noted to be chipped. A bag of what appeared to be sausage patties unlabeled and undated in the refrigerator. Opened and undated gallon of milk, and jugs of orange, prune, grape, cranberry, and tomato juice in the refrigerator. Review of an undated facility document titled Food Storage revealed that all foods that have been opened and partially used shall be dated and sealed before returning to a storage area. Interview with Staff A Dietary Manager (DM) on 7/27/23 at 10:15 AM, revealed that her expectation was that all food and drink would be dated when opened. She stated that she had not thought about the dishes not being covered or face down and acknowledged that spatulas were chipped.
Sept 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate monitoring for one of five re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate monitoring for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary use of psychotropic medication, ( Resident #17). Behaviors were not monitored related to medications administered for sleep. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Policy dated 05/2013 read, in pertinent part, When a psychotropic medication is ordered interventions and behaviors will be documented. Record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], according to the admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile Tab, with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, anxiety, chronic pain, and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/16/22, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The assessment indicated the resident exhibited behaviors including trouble falling or staying asleep or sleeping too much on half or more of the days of the assessment reference period and indicated Resident #17 received hypnotic medications (for sleep) on seven of seven days during the assessment period. Review of Resident #17's undated Psychotropic Medication Care Plan, found in the EMR under the Care Plan Tab, indicated the resident was receiving psychotropic medications. Approaches included: Administer psychotropic medications as ordered and monitor and document for behaviors on behavior flowsheets. Review of the resident's Medication Review Report found in the EMR under the Orders Tab and dated 09/23/22, indicated orders for Zaleplon (a hypnotic medication used to induce sleep) 5 MG (milligrams) at bedtime for insomnia. Review of Resident #17's Medication Administration Records (MARs) and Treatment Administration Records (TARs) for 09/01/22 through 09/23/22 revealed nothing to indicate hours of sleep/quality of sleep for his use of Zaleplon was being monitored. Review of Resident #17's Behavior Intervention Monitoring documentation 09/01/22 through 09/23/22 revealed nothing to indicate hours of sleep/quality of sleep for his use of Zaleplon was being monitored. During an interview with the MDS (Minimum Data Set)/Care Plan Nurse/Infection Preventionist (MDS/CP1/IP) on 09/23/22 at 3:44 PM, she indicated proper monitoring was not being done for the resident's use of Zaleplon for sleep. She stated Resident #17 should be monitored for sleep. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/23/22 at 4:22 PM, she stated staff should be monitoring Resident #17 for quality of sleep. She stated, We will have to develop a plan for that.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (93/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Iowa.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Iowa facilities.
  • • Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Kanawha Community Home, Inc.'s CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Kanawha Community Home, INC. an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Iowa, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Kanawha Community Home, Inc. Staffed?

CMS rates Kanawha Community Home, INC.'s staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 28%, compared to the Iowa average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Kanawha Community Home, Inc.?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at Kanawha Community Home, INC. during 2022 to 2023. These included: 4 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Kanawha Community Home, Inc.?

Kanawha Community Home, INC. is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 26 certified beds and approximately 20 residents (about 77% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Kanawha, Iowa.

How Does Kanawha Community Home, Inc. Compare to Other Iowa Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Iowa, Kanawha Community Home, INC.'s overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (28%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Kanawha Community Home, Inc.?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Kanawha Community Home, Inc. Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Kanawha Community Home, INC. has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Iowa. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Kanawha Community Home, Inc. Stick Around?

Staff at Kanawha Community Home, INC. tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 28%, the facility is 18 percentage points below the Iowa average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 14%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Kanawha Community Home, Inc. Ever Fined?

Kanawha Community Home, INC. has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Kanawha Community Home, Inc. on Any Federal Watch List?

Kanawha Community Home, INC. is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.