Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC

102 Highland Circle, Williamsburg, IA 52361 (319) 668-3800
Non profit - Corporation 59 Beds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
29/100
#199 of 392 in IA
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Highland Ridge Care Center in Williamsburg, Iowa has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility’s quality of care. Ranking #199 out of 392 facilities in Iowa places it in the bottom half, and #3 out of 4 in Iowa County means only one local option is better. The facility is showing improvement, reducing issues from 7 in 2023 to 2 in 2024, but it still faced a concerning $36,752 in fines, which is higher than 83% of Iowa facilities. Staffing is a notable strength with a perfect score of 5/5 and a turnover rate of 34%, which is below the state average, ensuring that staff are familiar with residents' needs. However, there were critical incidents, including a failure to provide appropriate care after a resident fell and sustained serious injuries, highlighting the need for substantial improvements in emergency response and pain management protocols.

Trust Score
F
29/100
In Iowa
#199/392
Top 50%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
34% turnover. Near Iowa's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$36,752 in fines. Higher than 82% of Iowa facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 46 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Iowa. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 7 issues
2024: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (34%)

    14 points below Iowa average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Iowa average (3.1)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 34%

12pts below Iowa avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $36,752

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
May 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed. The facility reported a c...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #3, dated 2/14/24, revealed diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and anxiety. The resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) due to short- and long-term memory problems. The MDS indicated a need for partial to moderate assistance with toileting and bathing, and supervision or touch assistance with personal hygiene. The Care Plan, dated 2/8/24, included focus areas for impaired skin integrity, and for risks of falls. The focus area for skin integrity included an intervention to assess/evaluate my risk status per policy, upon admission, quarterly and as needed. indicated the resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity. Another area indicated a psychosocial well-being problem related to anxiety, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and impaired cognition/communication. Neither addressed picking or scratching as symptoms or behaviors to monitor. A Progress Note dated 4/26/24 at 3:10 AM indicated the resident was scratching the back of his head and picking at scabs, small amounts of dried blood noted. A Progress Note dated 4/26/24 at 10:55 AM documented the resident had dried blood on his head due to picking at scabs and scratching his head. The Progress Notes lacked assessment information, including origin, size and notification of the provider. A document titled Body Audit - V4 on 4/28/24 at 5:48 PM documented a skin alteration on top of the scalp as scratches healing with no signs of infection. The clinical record lacked information, including origin, size and notification of the provider. A document titled Task: Skin Observation documented the resident had a skin alteration on 4/26/24 at 3:40 AM, and on 4/27/24 at 10:15 AM. The skin alteration on 4/26/24 at 3:40 AM assessed as an open area. The 4/27/24 at 10:15 AM assessed the area as not open. On 5/15/24 at 1:32 PM observed the resident resting on a sofa in his room. The area in question on his head appeared healed. The resident moved independently on the sofa and his walker was nearby. The resident's legs were tangled in his blanket as he rolled into a seated position. He fell back asleep, still sitting up. Resident remained in that position at 1:54 PM. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 9:21 AM Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) stated she was told the resident was confused and knelt down on the floor to pick something up and did not have a fall. She stated there was a dressing on his head and she was not sure what it was from. On 5/14/24 at 10:08 AM Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated Resident #3 had fallen a couple of times. She thought he had scratched his head this time, but later noted the area started to bruise and thought it might be from a fall. She reported this to a nurse and to the DON. A clinical record review revealed a lack of documentation regarding a resident fall. During an interview 5/14/24 at 1:41 PM, Staff B, CNA, stated on that she did not see the incident but worked with the resident. She stated he was acting out of the ordinary. She stated she saw a spot of blood on the floor and talked to the nurse. The CNA noted that the resident would not remember if he was on the floor and no one actually saw him fall or on the floor. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/14/24 at 4:42 PM, she stated the nurse was called in because the resident's head was bleeding. She cleaned and dressed it. The nurse thought it was scratching and picking. The DON said he did this behaviorally and it could cause bruising. During an interview on 5/16/24 at 8:49 AM, the DON stated if there is an concern with a resident and it is unknown what occurred the facility would try to figure out what happened. This involves talking to the resident, look at staffing patterns, resident behavior, time of day, if anything different about the day, resident behaviors related to possible urinary tract infection or respiratory concern. When asked how the process for different accounts of a concern is handled, the DON stated determine if resident can answer questions, look at information have, look at injury, what is the injury consistent with, try to assess is there is anything can figure out. It is detective work, and need to err on the side of caution.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to complete neurological assessments after unwitnessed falls for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #2 )reviewed. The facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to complete neurological assessments after unwitnessed falls for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #2 )reviewed. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2, dated 3/5/24, included diagnoses of vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 5 out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Progress notes dated 2/2024 x 2, 2/29/24, 3/11/24, 3/13/24 x 2, 3/15/24, 3/17/24, 3/19/24, 3/23/24, 3/24/24, 3/30/24, 4/18/24 x 2, 4/22/24, and 4/25/24 documented Resident #2 ' s unwitnessed falls. Facility documentation titled Neuro-Check Flow Sheet documented neurological assessments were completed for the fall that occurred on 3/23/24. The facility lacked neurological assessments for the other 15 unwitnessed falls. During an interview with Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), on 5/14/24 at 9:21 AM she indicated that staff should start neurological assessments with unwitnessed falls, as well as if the resident 's health declined or if they aren't sure if the resident hit their head. Staff E, RN stated on 5/14/24 at 3:48 PM the policy for falls was to start neurological assessments to determine resident status. With a lower BIMS it could be difficult to tell if the resident was a good witness and necessary to start the checks. She stated it is better to be safe than sorry. Staff E stated she recently laminated and posted the policy at the main nursing station in case staff had questions. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/14/24 at 4:42 PM revealed the interdisciplinary team (IDT) completed fall follow up. She stated the policy for starting neurological assessments with residents with cognitive impairment was not different and they just took what they said at face value. A policy titled Fall Prevention and Management Program Policy, modified April 2021, stated members of the interdisciplinary team were responsible for assessing, treating, and implementing strategies for the prevention of resident falls. For unwitnessed falls where the resident is not able to state if they hit their head, staff should perform neuro checks for 3 days according to a documented protocol. The policy lacked clarification regarding residents with impaired cognition.
Sept 2023 7 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, family interview, physician interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, family interview, physician interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessment and interventions for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #158). Clinical record review revealed on [DATE] at 9:30 p.m., Resident #158 fell and sustained a laceration to her head with a significant amount of blood loss. The facility staff failed to immediately call 911, call the physician, call the family, or conduct neurological assessments as per policy. The facility staff moved the resident to the shower and then to bed. Upon arrival of the next shift 9 hours later, the facility sent the resident to the emergency room (ER) where the resident was assessed to have fractures of the humerus and femur. The failure of assessing the resident properly and seeking immediate emergency treatment caused an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health and safety of the resident. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of [DATE] on [DATE] at 11:00 a.m. The facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] by implementing the following actions: 1. Resident #158 was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. 2. The 24-hour Summary Reports will be reviewed from [DATE] through [DATE] to determine whether resident assessments and subsequent intervention were implemented for residents experiencing a change of condition. If additional residents are identified who did not receive adequate assessment or subsequent intervention, the residents will be reassessed, and the respective Physician's will be notified. Completion date: [DATE] 3. All Nurses will be educated on the facility Post-Fall Check List, Fall Prevention and Management Program Policy, Microlearning: Observation and Reporting (the educator will also include the incident in question as an ancillary case study to the Microlearning), and the Communication and Notification - Staff, Practitioner, and Resident Representative Policy. Completion date: [DATE]. For nurses who are not available for training by the designated completion date (e.g., on FMLA, PRN and at College, on PTO), they will not be allowed to work a shift until they receive this training. 4. The 24-hour summary report will be reviewed daily by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to ensure all resident changes of condition are identified timely and appropriate assessment and intervention occur. Completion date: [DATE]. 5. The Clinical Administrator or designee will attend the IDT meetings two times per week x 6 weeks to ensure the 24-hour summary report reviews are occurring and to ensure all resident changes of condition are identified timely and appropriate assessment and intervention occur. Date monitoring will be initiated by (completion date): [DATE]. 6. The facility Policy: Fall Prevention and Management Program Policy with a modified date of [DATE] was reviewed on [DATE] and remains appropriate. 7. The facility Policy: Communication and Notification - Staff, Practitioners, and Resident Representatives Policy with a modified date of [DATE] was reviewed on [DATE] and remains appropriate. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #158 revealed the following diagnosis; dementia, anxiety, depression, glaucoma, high blood pressure and kidney disease. The MDS recorded the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making as moderately impaired and the resident required supervision with limited assistance of 1 person for bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene. The MDS coded that the resident was able to ambulate independently with a walker. The Care Plan dated [DATE] directed staff to administer pain medication as ordered and to monitor for both verbal and nonverbal signs and symptoms of pain and discomfort. The care plan instructed staff to monitor for signs or symptoms of further mood decline and update the physician as needed. A Progress Note dated [DATE] at 9:45 PM revealed Resident #158 yelled for help, found on the floor outside of the bathroom, laying on her right side, complained of pain all over, range of motion (ROM) and neurological checks were normal, and therefore the resident was moved from the floor with the assistance of 2 staff. The entry recorded an injury described as a 3 centimeter (cm) by 5 cm hematoma (localized bleeding, bruise) and 3 cm by 1 cm skin tear to the right eye. The entry documented the notification of the On-Call Registered Nurse (RN) Staff A, and a fax to Staff H, Physician, and that the Power of Attorney (POA) would be notified in the morning. The document titled Resident Occurrence dated [DATE] revealed: a. Resident #158 yelling, found outside bathroom door. b. Last observed in the dining room at 9:15 PM. c. Resident walking, no walker. d. Prevention from occurring again: frequent checks. e. Position of resident, on right side with gripper socks on, not wearing glasses. f. The floor was shiny. g. Signature Staff B, RN; Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA); and Staff D, CNA. The document titled Neuro Check Flow Sheet for Resident #158 revealed: a. On [DATE] at 9:45 PM, the resident alert, neuro check normal, pupils equal, reactive, brisk, with vital signs (VS) recorded as blood pressure (BP) 146/68 pulse (P) 68 and no change from baseline assessment. The entry lacked a pain assessment. b. On [DATE] at 10:00 PM, the resident alert, neuro check normal, pupils equal, reactive, brisk, with VS: BP 165/71 P 64, and no change from baseline assessment. The entry lacked documentation of a pain assessment. c. On [DATE] at 11:00 PM, the resident alert, neuro checks normal, pupils equal, reactive, brisk, with VS: BP 154/73, P 63, and no change from baseline assessment. The entry lacked documentation of a pain assessment. d. On [DATE] at 12:00 AM, the resident slept with VS: BP 148/54, P 74, and no change in baseline assessment. The entry lacked documentation of a comprehensive neuro check, pupil assessment, or pain assessment. e. On [DATE] at 2:00 AM, the resident was sleeping. The entry lacked documentation of a comprehensive neuro check, pupil assessment, measurement of VS, and pain assessments. f. On [DATE] at 4:00 AM, the resident slept with VS: BP 168/86, P 63, and no change in the baseline assessment. The entry lacked documentation of comprehensive neuro check, pupil assessment, and pain assessments. g. On [DATE] at 8:00 AM, the resident was sent to the hospital. h. Signature Staff B, RN The document titled Falls Follow up Form dated [DATE] at 9:45 PM recorded the following: a. Identified Resident #158. b. Vital Signs BP 146/68, Pulse 68, Respirations 18, Temperature 97.8, Oxygen Saturation 94%. c. The document lacked the following assessments: -Change of condition. -Sensory impairments. -Change in elimination. -Gait balance impairment: ROM, change in the ability to transfer. -Change in activity pattern: Sleep. -Pain. d. Analysis and Summary of causal factors: -Coming from the bathroom. -Not using a walker. e. Interventions: -Frequent checks. -Reminder to use the walker. f. Signature by Staff B, RN. A Facility Fax dated [DATE] at 10:55 PM revealed: a. Resident #158 was found on the floor. b. Vital signs Blood Pressure 146/68 Pulse 60. c. Hematoma and skin tear to the right eye. d. ROM and neurological checks are normal. e. Pain all over. f. Physician signature received on [DATE]. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated [DATE] for Resident #158 revealed: a. Acetaminophen (a.k.a. Tylenol) 325 milligrams (mg) to be administered four times a day. b. Acetaminophen administered on [DATE] four times, the last dose at bedtime. c. Fentanyl (narcotic pain medication) 12 micrograms/hour 72 hour patch. d. Fentanyl patch last applied on [DATE]. e. MAR lacked an order for as needed (PRN) pain medication. f. MAR lacked documentation of a Standing Order pain medication administered on [DATE] - [DATE]. A Change of Condition Note dated [DATE] at 6:30 AM revealed Resident #158 complained of pain to the right upper extremity (RUE), refused to move the arm, and yelled out in pain when the nurse touched RUE. The documentation revealed Staff H, the POA, Staff A, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were notified and a report was called to the emergency room (ER) Nurse. Resident #158 was transferred to the local hospital at 6:47 AM. The Local Hospital ER Notes dated [DATE] at 7:10 AM revealed Resident #158 arrived via ambulance laying on her left side, unable to roll over onto her back, guarding her right arm, and she yelled no with a light touch to the deformity noted on the right humerus. The notes documented the resident's left lower extremity shortened and rotated, a laceration with dried blood present above her right eye, and diffuse bruising around the right orbit. The x-ray of the right shoulder revealed a displaced fracture of the right humerus and the x-ray of the right hip revealed a displaced right femur fracture; the resident was treated with oxygen and Dilaudid pain medication. A Progress Note dated [DATE] at 5:26 PM documented a phone call placed to the local hospital for an update on Resident #158 and the resident was diagnosed with a fractured right shoulder, fractured right hip, and required a higher level of care therefore transferred to a tertiary hospital. A Progress Note on [DATE] at 6:57 AM documented notification given to Staff H that Resident #158 admitted to the tertiary hospital. A Progress Note on [DATE] at 11:51 AM revealed Staff H acknowledged the fax received in regards to Resident #158's fall. A Facility Fax dated [DATE] at 5:49 AM revealed: a. Resident #158 was transferred to the local hospital for an evaluation. b. Resident #158 was subsequently transferred to tertiary hospital and admitted for hip and shoulder fractures. c. Physician signature received on [DATE]. A Hospital Report on [DATE] at 1:58 PM revealed: a. Resident #158 was admitted due to uncontrolled pain. b. Significant bruising to the right eye area, laceration near the right eye, right femur and right humeral head fracture. c. Resident #158 had a history of dementia and prior stroke and was on Plavix (blood thinner). d. Recommendation to the family was to focus on comfort care with Hospice support for pain management. e. Resident #158 had significant bleeding from head, two staff reportedly got her off the floor, showered her and placed her in the bed for the night without calling the physician or family. A Progress Note on [DATE] at 11:50 AM revealed Resident #158 returned from the hospital via ambulance, drowsy but responsive to pain. The entry recorded the resident had a fracture to right humeral head and femoral neck, multiple bruises to face and right arm due to recent a fall on [DATE]. The entry documented the resident admitted to Hospice care and treated with Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 2.25 milliliters (ml) for the pain. A Progress Note on [DATE] at 1:30 PM revealed Resident #158 passed away with family at bedside. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:59 PM, Staff J, CNA stated that after a normal fall, the staff use the walkie to call the nurse who does the evaluation, measures vitals, and the staff would use a sling and Hoyer (mechanical lift) to get the resident up unless the resident can get up on their own. Staff J stated if a resident could stand, then they would get up themselves. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:16 PM, Staff B, RN stated Resident #158 was independent with ambulation. Staff B reported the resident fell close to the shift change in the bathroom, cut her eyebrow, it was not actively bleeding, but the resident had blood on the floor, her hands and her legs. Staff B stated the staff cleaned up the blood, assessed her neuro's, range of motion, vital signs and Staff B told the staff to get the resident up to a shower chair. Staff B stated the staff stood the resident, pivoted her to the shower chair, and washed off the blood. Staff B stated she completed the fall paperwork and sent the incident paperwork to Staff A. Staff B stated the staff dressed the resident and put her to bed. Staff B stated the resident was in pain but could not tell Staff B where the pain was located. Staff B said at 4:30 AM or 5:00 AM the staff tried to move the resident and the resident's arm hurt. Staff B stated she didn't remember notifying the doctor but she did send a fax to him. Staff B stated Resident #158 was bleeding and she applied first aid. During a family interview on [DATE] at 2:33 PM, the POA stated she was not notified on the evening Resident #158 fell. The POA stated the staff said the resident fell around 9:00 PM or 10:00 PM and they didn't call her until 6:30 AM to ask if she could go to the hospital. The POA stated the staff reported they got the resident up and put her in the shower due to having blood everywhere. The POA voiced the prognosis and the resident's ability to do therapy was poor. The POA stated they offered comfort care so she agreed to that and the resident returned to the facility where she died on [DATE]. The POA voiced that the facility left the resident there to suffer in pain all that night with a fractured hip and shoulder. The POA stated the resident resided at the facility for 8 years and when the staff said they didn't want to bother her in the middle of the night, she asked the nurse when 9:30 PM considered the middle of the night, but the staff would not answer her. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:53 PM, Staff K, RN stated when a resident fell the nursing staff followed the fall protocol, obtained vital signs, performed an assessment of the extremities and pain, and charted observations to include the position of the resident, the wheelchair or walker, and what the resident wore. Staff K stated if a resident could stand, they moved them. Staff K stated the protocol was to call the doctor and hospital intervention if needed; fax the physician if no visible injuries. Staff K stated on [DATE] she arrived at 6 AM and during the nurse report, the night nurse stated Resident #158 fell in the Memory Care Unit and bumped her head. Staff K stated that Staff B, RN claimed the staff found the resident and there was so much blood that the staff showered the resident before they put her to bed. Staff K stated Staff B reported that Resident #158 had a head injury of a skin tear but was not sent to the hospital. Staff K stated the resident was really in so much pain, it could be seen on her face and when they moved the resident ' s arm she shouted in pain. Staff K stated Staff B then called the On-Call nurse, the doctor and family at 6:30 AM. Staff K stated the POA called back and asked her if the staff normally showered someone after a fall. Staff K said she responded that the night nurse said they had to because there was so much blood they couldn't find where it was coming from. In an interview on [DATE] at 8:05 PM, Staff G, CNA stated she found Resident #158 on the floor on [DATE] at 9:30 PM. Staff G voiced she would not forget it because it was traumatic for her. Staff G stated Staff D, CNA heard Resident #158 called out and she found the resident lying on the floor just inside her bathroom, in her bedroom, on her right side in the fetal position. Staff G reported the resident was not lying still and she moved around in the blood. Staff G recalled blood being present on the floor, up the wall, in the resident ' s hair, and on the left side of her head, hands and legs. Staff G stated she called the nurse with the walkie and put a pillow under the resident ' s head. Staff G reported there was so much blood that she started wiping the resident ' s hands off with a washcloth to see where it was coming from. Staff G commented that the resident ' s left side of her face and hair were red. Staff G stated Staff B, RN came in, took the vital signs and instructed her to get Resident #158 in the shower to wash away the blood. Staff G said the resident ' s pajamas were soaked in blood. Staff G stated Staff B assisted to stand Resident #158 up, pivoted her into a shower chair, washed her off, then started to dress the resident. Staff G recalled Resident #158 said it hurt and told them not to push when they applied the gripper socks and pants. Staff G stated Staff D helped to push the shower chair next to the bed, they stood Resident #158 and pulled up her pants, pivoted her and put her into the bed. Staff G stated she asked Staff B if she thought they should send the resident out due to the resident losing so much blood but Staff B did not. During an interview on [DATE] at 7:50 AM, Staff A, RN Clinical Administrator stated she did not know about the fall until the morning of [DATE] at 6:30 AM and she said to send the resident to the hospital. Staff A stated the staff knew they could call 24/7 and the expectation was to call with a fall. Staff A reported they did not investigate the fall and they did not interview the staff. Staff A stated that Resident #158 was ambulatory and therefore no self report was made to the state. Staff A stated the fall happened during her first week at the facility. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:05 AM, Staff H, Physician responded if anyone found a resident on the floor, he would expect the staff to look for any visible wounds, assess for pain in any extremity and if they had a visible head wound, there may be a hemorrhage so of course to call 911. Staff H stated the staff could call 24/7 to report a fall and receive orders for treatment. In a subsequent interview on [DATE] at 10:28 AM, Staff H, Physician stated a review of the call logs revealed that there was no call for a fall on Resident #158 and he did not remember receiving one. Staff H stated he found a fax dated [DATE] at 10:45 PM that documented Resident #158 was found on the floor on her right side, her range of motion and neuro's were normal, she had a hematoma and complained of pain all over. Staff H commented that looking at the fax, the staff should have called 911. Staff H stated another fax received on Monday [DATE] at 5:49 AM documented the resident transferred to the local hospital. Staff H said a 2nd fax received on [DATE] at 3:47 PM notified him of the resident's death, 2 hours after Resident #158 passed away. During an interview on [DATE] at 8:08 AM, Staff E, CNA reported working for the facility for 13 years. Staff E stated on [DATE] at 10:00 PM she received a report that Resident #158 fell and the other CNA's had showered her. Staff E recalled Resident #158 wore a nightgown and laid in bed shaking. Staff E said the resident didn't verbalize and she didn't even touch the resident that night as the resident laid at the head of the bed but had turned herself around with her head at the foot of the bed. Staff E voiced she didn't touch the resident, provide check and change care, or turn the resident because she didn't want to cause her any more pain. Staff E reported the resident laid in the fetal position in bed all night shaking. Staff E voiced the resident was shaking really badly and the resident did not shake normally and therefore Staff E was not comfortable with doing anything with the resident. Staff E recalled thinking why didn ' t they send her out. Staff E stated that Resident #158 remained at the facility as of 6 AM when her shift was complete. Staff E stated the Memory Care Unit was where she worked and Resident #158 normally slept all night and would get up when she needed to use the bathroom. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:00 AM, Staff B, RN stated Resident #158 was able to sit up, had full range of motion to her arms and legs, and no complaints of pain. Staff B said she wanted the resident cleaned up as she had dried blood in her hair, on her hands, and legs. Staff B stated she gave the instruction for the CNA's to get Resident #158 showered. Staff B said while she observed, the resident alternated cradling her arms in her lap. Staff B stated the CNA's put the residents arms in her gown, they wheeled the shower chair over to the bed and put the resident to bed onto her right side and covered her. Staff B said she completed another set of vital signs and neurological checks. Staff B reported when she returned an hour later the resident slept and she was sleeping every time Staff B went into her room. Staff B stated she had notified the On-Call Nurse, Staff A, with a text, who responded ok. Staff B said she continued neuros during the night and the resident ' s eye was bruised. Staff B stated Staff E called at midnight, reporting Resident #158 was experiencing pain. Staff B commented the resident didn't look like she was in distress, nothing unusual. Staff B stated that Staff E reported Resident #158 was moving around in her bed, laid toward her headboard and other times her head toward the foot board. Staff B administered an as needed (prn) Tylenol at midnight per the standing order. Staff B voiced she didn't document it as the stomach pain was normal for the resident. Staff B stated she did not notify the doctor in this case as there was a standing order. Staff B reported at 4:00 to 5:00 AM, the resident said ouch, don't touch her arm. Staff B stated she updated Staff A with a text at that time that she was working on sending the resident out for further evaluation. Staff B stated she made the decision to send the resident out. Staff B said she notified the POA at 4:00 -5:00 AM letting her know the resident fell the night before, cut above her eyebrow, they cleaned her up in the shower, completed neuro checks and she had a change. Staff B stated the resident didn't want to move her right arm so Staff B wanted to send the resident out if the POA was okay with it. Staff B stated she called the provider to get the order and called the ER at the local hospital to give a report. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:24 AM, Staff A, RN, Clinical Administrator stated she checked for a text from Staff B on the evening of [DATE] and she did not get a text or call. Staff A stated she did not get a call until [DATE] at 6:30 AM when she said to send Resident #158 to the hospital. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:30 PM, Staff L, Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP), stated she remembered receiving a call on [DATE] from the nurse asking permission to send the resident to the hospital. Staff L reported she was on call for the providers in that area and at the hospital emergency room (ER). Staff L stated the staff did not call the physician when Resident #158 fell at 9:00 PM on [DATE]. Staff L voiced the whole thing was not right as Staff B said they found the resident down, put her back to bed, and the resident didn't want to get up in the morning, so they needed permission to send her. Staff L stated the resident had a head injury, there was shortening of the resident's right leg and it was rotated outward, the resident guarded her right arm screaming if staff touched it, and they gave the resident nothing for her pain. Staff L stated the staff should have called the on-call provider at the time Resident #158 was found on the floor to seek treatment orders; the on-call providers take calls 24/7. The policy titled Fall Prevention and Management dated [DATE] revealed: a. The Clinical Administrator is responsible for assuring implementation of this policy. b. All staff are responsible for implementing the intent and directives contained within this policy. c. The Nurse will immediately evaluate the resident for any injury, change in status and/ or pain and will proceed with emergency procedures and interventions as indicated. d. Suspected head injury or possible significant injury or fracture: the resident is not to be moved until emergency personnel have arrived unless it is determined that the resident is at risk for injuring self further or is at risk for further injury if they are not moved. e. The Nurse will notify 911, the primary physician and/or Nurse Practitioner (NP) and the RN in charge as indicated based on the initial evaluation and the resident care plan. f. The Staff Nurse will complete the resident Occurrence Report and notify the physician and responsible party. g. Minor Head Trauma or Unwitnessed Fall where the resident is not able to state if they hit their head 1. Determine vital signs including orthostatic blood pressures. 2. Determine circumstances leading to the fall and interventions. 3. Perform Neuro Checks: a. Day 1: i. Every 15 minutes x 2 ii. Every hour x 2 iii. Every 2 hours x 2 iv. Every 4 hours x 2 b. Days 2 and 3: i. Every shift c. Alert the Physician or NP with any changes. h. An entry into the medical record will be completed to include: patient appearance at time of discovery, patient response to event, evidence of injury, location, medical provider notification, responsible party notification, nursing actions.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #158). Clinical record review revealed on [DATE] at 9:30 p.m., Resident #158 fell and sustained a laceration to her head with a significant amount of blood loss. The facility staff moved the resident to the shower and then to bed and the resident reported pain that was not treated. Upon arrival of the next shift 9 hours later, the facility sent the resident to the emergency room (ER) where the resident was assessed to have fractures of the humerus and femur and immediately treated for pain; the resident admitting diagnoses included uncontrolled pain. The failure created an immediate jeopardy to the health and safety of the resident. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. After a QA Review, the State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of [DATE] on [DATE] at 12:30 p.m. related to pain management. The facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] by implementing the following actions: 1. Resident #158 was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. 2. The staff nurse in question was separated from the resident and put on indefinite suspension beginning [DATE] pending outcome of Dependent Adult Abuse investigation. 3. All clinical staff educated on the Pain Assessment and Management Policy. Staff education occurred on [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. Any staff who were PRN (casual status), student status, leave status, or who otherwise did not work on a routine basis were allowed to work the floor until after the time they had been able to be educated on the Pain Assessment and Management Policy. 4. The facility Pain Assessment and Management Policy was reviewed on [DATE] with no subsequent changes. 5. The Clinical Administrator, Care Center Administrator or designee will interview 25% of care center residents per week x 4 weeks to determine if licensed staff are responsive to resident pain. This will include staff and family interviews for residents in the CCDI household. Any identified issues will be referred to the subsequent QAPI meeting. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #158 revealed the following diagnosis; dementia, anxiety, depression, glaucoma, high blood pressure and kidney disease. The MDS recorded the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making as moderately impaired and the resident required supervision with limited assistance of 1 person for bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene. The MDS coded that the resident was able to ambulate independently with a walker. The Care Plan dated [DATE] directed staff to administer pain medication as ordered and to monitor for both verbal and nonverbal signs and symptoms of pain and discomfort. The care plan instructed staff to monitor for signs or symptoms of further mood decline and update the physician as needed. A Progress Note dated [DATE] at 9:45 PM revealed Resident #158 yelled for help, found on the floor outside of the bathroom, laying on her right side, complained of pain all over, range of motion (ROM) and neurological checks were normal, and therefore the resident was moved from the floor with the assistance of 2 staff. The entry recorded an injury described as a 3 centimeter (cm) by 5 cm hematoma (localized bleeding, bruise) and 3 cm by 1 cm skin tear to the right eye. The entry documented the notification of the On-Call Registered Nurse (RN) Staff A, and a fax to Staff H, Physician, and that the Power of Attorney (POA) would be notified in the morning. The document titled Resident Occurrence dated [DATE] revealed: a. Resident #158 yelling, found outside bathroom door. b. Last observed in the dining room at 9:15 PM. c. Resident walking, no walker. d. Prevention from occurring again: frequent checks. e. Position of resident, on right side with gripper socks on, not wearing glasses. f. The floor was shiny. g. Signature Staff B, RN; Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA); and Staff D, CNA. The document titled Neuro Check Flow Sheet for Resident #158 revealed: a. On [DATE] at 9:45 PM, the resident alert, neuro check normal, pupils equal, reactive, brisk, with vital signs (VS) recorded as blood pressure (BP) 146/68 pulse (P) 68 and no change from baseline assessment. The entry lacked a pain assessment. b. On [DATE] at 10:00 PM, the resident alert, neuro check normal, pupils equal, reactive, brisk, with VS: BP 165/71 P 64, and no change from baseline assessment. The entry lacked documentation of a pain assessment. c. On [DATE] at 11:00 PM, the resident alert, neuro checks normal, pupils equal, reactive, brisk, with VS: BP 154/73, P 63, and no change from baseline assessment. The entry lacked documentation of a pain assessment. d. On [DATE] at 12:00 AM, the resident slept with VS: BP 148/54, P 74, and no change in baseline assessment. The entry lacked documentation of a comprehensive neuro check, pupil assessment, or pain assessment. e. On [DATE] at 2:00 AM, the resident was sleeping. The entry lacked documentation of a comprehensive neuro check, pupil assessment, measurement of VS, and pain assessments. f. On [DATE] at 4:00 AM, the resident slept with VS: BP 168/86, P 63, and no change in the baseline assessment. The entry lacked documentation of comprehensive neuro check, pupil assessment, and pain assessments. g. On [DATE] at 8:00 AM, the resident was sent to the hospital. h. Signature Staff B, RN The document titled Falls Follow up Form dated [DATE] at 9:45 PM recorded the following: a. Identified Resident #158. b. Vital Signs BP 146/68, Pulse 68, Respirations 18, Temperature 97.8, Oxygen Saturation 94%. c. The document lacked the following assessments: -Change of condition. -Sensory impairments. -Change in elimination. -Gait balance impairment: ROM, change in the ability to transfer. -Change in activity pattern: Sleep. -Pain. d. Analysis and Summary of causal factors: -Coming from the bathroom. -Not using a walker. e. Interventions: -Frequent checks. -Reminder to use the walker. f. Signature by Staff B, RN. A Facility Fax dated [DATE] at 10:55 PM revealed: a. Resident #158 was found on the floor. b. Vital signs Blood Pressure 146/68 Pulse 60. c. Hematoma and skin tear to the right eye. d. ROM and neurological checks are normal. e. Pain all over. f. Physician signature received on [DATE]. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated [DATE] for Resident #158 revealed: a. Acetaminophen (a.k.a. Tylenol) 325 milligrams (mg) to be administered four times a day. b. Acetaminophen administered on [DATE] four times, the last dose at bedtime. c. Fentanyl (narcotic pain medication) 12 micrograms/hour 72 hour patch. d. Fentanyl patch last applied on [DATE]. e. MAR lacked an order for as needed (PRN) pain medication. f. MAR lacked documentation of a Standing Order pain medication administered on [DATE] - [DATE]. A Change of Condition Note dated [DATE] at 6:30 AM revealed Resident #158 complained of pain to the right upper extremity (RUE), refused to move the arm, and yelled out in pain when the nurse touched RUE. The documentation revealed Staff H, the POA, Staff A, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were notified and a report was called to the emergency room (ER) Nurse. Resident #158 was transferred to the local hospital at 6:47 AM. The Local Hospital ER Notes dated [DATE] at 7:10 AM revealed Resident #158 arrived via ambulance laying on her left side, unable to roll over onto her back, guarding her right arm, and she yelled no with a light touch to the deformity noted on the right humerus. The notes documented the resident's left lower extremity shortened and rotated, a laceration with dried blood present above her right eye, and diffuse bruising around the right orbit. The x-ray of the right shoulder revealed a displaced fracture of the right humerus and the x-ray of the right hip revealed a displaced right femur fracture; the resident was treated with oxygen and Dilaudid pain medication. A Progress Note dated [DATE] at 5:26 PM documented a phone call placed to the local hospital for an update on Resident #158 and the resident was diagnosed with a fractured right shoulder, fractured right hip, and required a higher level of care therefore transferred to a tertiary hospital. A Progress Note on [DATE] at 6:57 AM documented notification given to Staff H that Resident #158 admitted to the tertiary hospital. A Progress Note on [DATE] at 11:51 AM revealed Staff H acknowledged the fax received in regards to Resident #158's fall. A Facility Fax dated [DATE] at 5:49 AM revealed: a. Resident #158 was transferred to the local hospital for an evaluation. b. Resident #158 was subsequently transferred to tertiary hospital and admitted for hip and shoulder fractures. c. Physician signature received on [DATE]. A Hospital Report on [DATE] at 1:58 PM revealed: a. Resident #158 was admitted due to uncontrolled pain. b. Significant bruising to the right eye area, laceration near the right eye, right femur and right humeral head fracture. c. Resident #158 had a history of dementia and prior stroke and was on Plavix (blood thinner). d. Recommendation to the family was to focus on comfort care with Hospice support for pain management. e. Resident #158 had significant bleeding from head, two staff reportedly got her off the floor, showered her and placed her in the bed for the night without calling the physician or family. A Progress Note on [DATE] at 11:50 AM revealed Resident #158 returned from the hospital via ambulance, drowsy but responsive to pain. The entry recorded the resident had a fracture to right humeral head and femoral neck, multiple bruises to face and right arm due to recent a fall on [DATE]. The entry documented the resident admitted to Hospice care and treated with Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 2.25 milliliters (ml) for the pain. A Progress Note on [DATE] at 1:30 PM revealed Resident #158 passed away with family at bedside. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:16 PM, Staff B, RN stated Resident #158 was independent with ambulation. Staff B reported the resident fell close to the shift change in the bathroom, cut her eyebrow, it was not actively bleeding, but the resident had blood on the floor, her hands and her legs. Staff B stated the staff cleaned up the blood, assessed her neuro's, range of motion, vital signs and Staff B told the staff to get the resident up to a shower chair. Staff B stated the staff stood the resident, pivoted her to the shower chair, and washed off the blood. Staff B stated she completed the fall paperwork and sent the incident paperwork to Staff A. Staff B stated the staff dressed the resident and put her to bed. Staff B stated the resident was in pain but could not tell Staff B where the pain was located. Staff B said at 4:30 AM or 5:00 AM the staff tried to move the resident and the resident's arm hurt. Staff B stated she didn't remember notifying the doctor but she did send a fax to him. Staff B stated Resident #158 was bleeding and she applied first aid. During a family interview on [DATE] at 2:33 PM, the POA stated she was not notified on the evening Resident #158 fell. The POA stated the staff said the resident fell around 9:00 PM or 10:00 PM and they didn't call her until 6:30 AM to ask if she could go to the hospital. The POA stated the staff reported they got the resident up and put her in the shower due to having blood everywhere. The POA voiced the prognosis and the resident's ability to do therapy was poor. The POA stated they offered comfort care so she agreed to that and the resident returned to the facility where she died on [DATE]. The POA voiced that the facility left the resident there to suffer in pain all that night with a fractured hip and shoulder. The POA stated the resident resided at the facility for 8 years and when the staff said they didn't want to bother her in the middle of the night, she asked the nurse when 9:30 PM considered the middle of the night, but the staff would not answer her. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:53 PM, Staff K, RN stated when a resident fell the nursing staff followed the fall protocol, obtained vital signs, performed an assessment of the extremities and pain, and charted observations to include the position of the resident, the wheelchair or walker, and what the resident wore. Staff K stated if a resident could stand, they moved them. Staff K stated the protocol was to call the doctor and hospital intervention if needed; fax the physician if no visible injuries. Staff K stated on [DATE] she arrived at 6 AM and during the nurse report, the night nurse stated Resident #158 fell in the Memory Care Unit and bumped her head. Staff K stated that Staff B, RN claimed the staff found the resident and there was so much blood that the staff showered the resident before they put her to bed. Staff K stated Staff B reported that Resident #158 had a head injury of a skin tear but was not sent to the hospital. Staff K stated the resident was really in so much pain, it could be seen on her face and when they moved the resident ' s arm she shouted in pain. Staff K stated Staff B then called the On-Call nurse, the doctor and family at 6:30 AM. In an interview on [DATE] at 8:05 PM, Staff G, CNA stated she found Resident #158 on the floor on [DATE] at 9:30 PM. Staff G voiced she would not forget it because it was traumatic for her. Staff G stated Staff D, CNA heard Resident #158 called out and she found the resident lying on the floor just inside her bathroom, in her bedroom, on her right side in the fetal position. Staff G reported the resident was not lying still and she moved around in the blood. Staff G recalled blood being present on the floor, up the wall, in the resident ' s hair, and on the left side of her head, hands and legs. Staff G stated she called the nurse with the walkie and put a pillow under the resident ' s head. Staff G reported there was so much blood that she started wiping the resident ' s hands off with a washcloth to see where it was coming from. Staff G commented that the resident ' s left side of her face and hair were red. Staff G stated Staff B, RN came in, took the vital signs and instructed her to get Resident #158 in the shower to wash away the blood. Staff G said the resident ' s pajamas were soaked in blood. Staff G stated Staff B assisted to stand Resident #158 up, pivoted her into a shower chair, washed her off, then started to dress the resident. Staff G recalled Resident #158 said it hurt and told them not to push when they applied the gripper socks and pants. Staff G stated Staff D helped to push the shower chair next to the bed, they stood Resident #158 and pulled up her pants, pivoted her and put her into the bed. During an interview on [DATE] at 7:50 AM, Staff A, RN Clinical Administrator stated she did not know about the fall until the morning of [DATE] at 6:30 AM and she said to send the resident to the hospital. Staff A stated the staff knew they could call 24/7 and the expectation was to call with a fall. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:05 AM, Staff H, Physician responded if anyone found a resident on the floor, he would expect the staff to look for any visible wounds, assess for pain in any extremity and if they had a visible head wound, there may be a hemorrhage so of course to call 911. Staff H stated the staff could call 24/7 to report a fall and receive orders for treatment. In a subsequent interview on [DATE] at 10:28 AM, Staff H, Physician stated a review of the call logs revealed that there was no call for a fall on Resident #158 and he did not remember receiving one. Staff H stated he found a fax dated [DATE] at 10:45 PM that documented Resident #158 was found on the floor on her right side, her range of motion and neuro's were normal, she had a hematoma and complained of pain all over. Staff H commented that looking at the fax, the staff should have called 911. Staff H stated another fax received on Monday [DATE] at 5:49 AM documented the resident transferred to the local hospital. Staff H said a 2nd fax received on [DATE] at 3:47 PM notified him of the resident's death, 2 hours after Resident #158 passed away. During an interview on [DATE] at 8:08 AM, Staff E, CNA reported working for the facility for 13 years. Staff E stated on [DATE] at 10:00 PM she received a report that Resident #158 fell and the other CNA's had showered her. Staff E recalled Resident #158 wore a nightgown and laid in bed shaking. Staff E said the resident didn't verbalize and she didn't even touch the resident that night as the resident laid at the head of the bed but had turned herself around with her head at the foot of the bed. Staff E voiced she didn't touch the resident, provide check and change care, or turn the resident because she didn't want to cause her any more pain. Staff E reported the resident laid in the fetal position in bed all night shaking. Staff E voiced the resident was shaking really badly and the resident did not shake normally and therefore Staff E was not comfortable with doing anything with the resident. Staff E recalled thinking why didn ' t they send her out. Staff E stated that Resident #158 remained at the facility as of 6 AM when her shift was complete. Staff E stated the Memory Care Unit was where she worked and Resident #158 normally slept all night and would get up when she needed to use the bathroom. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:00 AM, Staff B, RN stated Resident #158 was able to sit up, had full range of motion to her arms and legs, and no complaints of pain. Staff B said she wanted the resident cleaned up as she had dried blood in her hair, on her hands, and legs. Staff B stated she gave the instruction for the CNA's to get Resident #158 showered. Staff B said while she observed, the resident alternated cradling her arms in her lap. Staff B stated the CNA's put the residents arms in her gown, they wheeled the shower chair over to the bed and put the resident to bed onto her right side and covered her. Staff B said she completed another set of vital signs and neurological checks. Staff B reported when she returned an hour later the resident slept and she was sleeping every time Staff B went into her room. Staff B stated she had notified the On-Call Nurse, Staff A, with a text, who responded ok. Staff B said she continued neuros during the night and the resident ' s eye was bruised. Staff B stated Staff E called at midnight, reporting Resident #158 was experiencing pain. Staff B commented the resident didn't look like she was in distress, nothing unusual. Staff B stated that Staff E reported Resident #158 was moving around in her bed, laid toward her headboard and other times her head toward the foot board. Staff B administered an as needed (prn) Tylenol at midnight per the standing order. Staff B voiced she didn't document it as the stomach pain was normal for the resident. Staff B stated she did not notify the doctor in this case as there was a standing order. Staff B reported at 4:00 to 5:00 AM, the resident said ouch, don't touch her arm. Staff B stated she updated Staff A with a text at that time that she was working on sending the resident out for further evaluation. Staff B stated she made the decision to send the resident out. Staff B said she notified the POA at 4:00 -5:00 AM letting her know the resident fell the night before, cut above her eyebrow, they cleaned her up in the shower, completed neuro checks and she had a change. Staff B stated the resident didn't want to move her right arm so Staff B wanted to send the resident out if the POA was okay with it. Staff B stated she called the provider to get the order and called the ER at the local hospital to give a report. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:30 PM, Staff L, Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP), stated she remembered receiving a call on [DATE] from the nurse asking permission to send the resident to the hospital. Staff L reported she was on call for the providers in that area and at the hospital emergency room (ER). Staff L stated the staff did not call the physician when Resident #158 fell at 9:00 PM on [DATE]. Staff L voiced the whole thing was not right as Staff B said they found the resident down, put her back to bed, and the resident didn't want to get up in the morning, so they needed permission to send her. Staff L stated the resident had a head injury, there was shortening of the resident's right leg and it was rotated outward, the resident guarded her right arm screaming if staff touched it, and they gave the resident nothing for her pain. Staff L stated the staff should have called the on-call provider at the time Resident #158 was found on the floor to seek treatment orders; the on-call providers take calls 24/7. The policy titled Fall Prevention and Management dated [DATE] revealed: a. The Clinical Administrator is responsible for assuring implementation of this policy. b. All staff are responsible for implementing the intent and directives contained within this policy. c. The Nurse will immediately evaluate the resident for any injury, change in status and/ or pain and will proceed with emergency procedures and interventions as indicated. d. Suspected head injury or possible significant injury or fracture: the resident is not to be moved until emergency personnel have arrived unless it is determined that the resident is at risk for injuring self further or is at risk for further injury if they are not moved. e. The Nurse will notify 911, the primary physician and/or Nurse Practitioner (NP) and the RN in charge as indicated based on the initial evaluation and the resident care plan. f. The Staff Nurse will complete the resident Occurrence Report and notify the physician and responsible party. g. Minor Head Trauma or Unwitnessed Fall where the resident is not able to state if they hit their head 1. Determine vital signs including orthostatic blood pressures. 2. Determine circumstances leading to the fall and interventions. 3. Perform Neuro Checks: a. Day 1: i. Every 15 minutes x 2 ii. Every hour x 2 iii. Every 2 hours x 2 iv. Every 4 hours x 2 b. Days 2 and 3: i. Every shift c. Alert the Physician or NP with any changes. h. An entry into the medical record will be completed to include: patient appearance at time of discovery, patient response to event, evidence of injury, location, medical provider notification, responsible party notification, nursing actions.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, physician interview, family interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, physician interview, family interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician and family in a timely manner when acute changes occurred in a resident's physical condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #158). Clinical record review revealed on 6/2/23 at 9:30 p.m., Resident #158 fell and sustained a laceration to her head with a significant amount of bleeding. The facility staff failed to immediately call 911, call the physician, and call the family for 9 hours. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #158 included the following diagnoses: dementia, anxiety, depression, glaucoma, high blood pressure and kidney disease. The MDS recoreded the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making as moderately impaired and the resident required supervision with limited assistance of 1 person for bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene. The MDS coded the resident as able to ambulate independently with a walker. The Care Plan dated 6/1/23 directed staff to administer pain medication as ordered and to monitor for both verbal and nonverbal signs and symptoms of pain and discomfort. The care plan instructed staff to monitor for signs or symptoms of further mood decline and update the physician as needed. A Progress Note dated 6/2/23 at 9:45 PM, revealed Resident #158 yelled for help, found on the floor outside of the bathroom, laying on her right side, complained of pain all over, range of motion (ROM) and neurological checks were normal, and therefore the resident was moved from the floor with the assistance of 2 staff. The injury described was a 3 centimeter (cm) by 5 cm hematoma (localized bleeding, bruise) and 3 cm by 1 cm skin tear to the right eye. The documentation revealed the notification of the On-Call Registered Nurse (RN), Staff A and a fax to Staff H, Physician, and would notify the Power of Attorney (POA) in the morning. The Change of Condition note dated 6/3/23 at 6:30 AM, revealed Resident #158 complained of pain to the right upper extremity (RUE), refused to move the arm and yelled out in pain when the nurse touched RUE. The documentation revealed Staff H, the POA, Staff A and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were notified and a report was called to the emergency room (ER) Nurse. Resident #158 was transferred to the local hospital at 6:47 AM. Review of a facility Fax dated 6/2/23 at 10:55 PM revealed the following: a. Resident #158 was found on the floor. b. Vital signs Blood Pressure 146/68 Pulse 60. c. Hematoma and skin tear to the right eye. d. ROM and neurological checks are normal. e. Pain all over. f. Physician signature received on 6/5/23. A Progress Note on 6/5/23 at 6:57 AM, revealed notification of Staff H that Resident #158 was admitted to the tertiary hospital. A Progress Note on 6/5/23 at 11:51 AM, revealed Staff H acknowledged the fall fax received in regards to Resident #158. Review of a facility Fax dated 6/5/23 at 5:49 AM revealed the following: a. Resident #158 was transferred to the local hospital for an evaluation. b. Resident #158 was subsequently transferred to tertiary hospital and admitted for hip and shoulder fractures. c. Physician signature received on 6/5/23. Review of the Local Hospital Report on 6/5/23 at 1:58 PM revealed: a. Resident #158 was admitted due to uncontrolled pain. b. Significant bruising to the right eye area, laceration near the right eye, right femur and right humeral head fracture. c. Resident #158 had a history of dementia and prior stroke and was on Plavix (blood thinner). d. Resident #158 had significant bleeding from head, two staff reportedly got her off the floor, showered her and placed her in the bed for the night without calling the physician or family. During an interview on 8/15/23 at 2:16 PM, Staff B, RN stated Resident #158 was independent with ambulation, she fell close to shift change in the bathroom, cut her eyebrow, it was not actively bleeding, but she had blood on the floor, her hands and her legs. Staff B stated the staff cleaned up the blood, assessed the resident's neuro's and range of motion, vital signs and told the staff to get her up to a shower chair. Staff B stated she completed the fall paperwork and sent the incident paperwork to Staff A, RN. Staff B stated the staff dressed the resident and put her to bed. Staff B stated the resident was in pain but could not tell her where the pain was located, then at 4:30 or 5:00 AM, the staff tried to move the resident and her arm hurt. Staff B stated she did not remember notifying the doctor, but she did send a fax to him. Staff B stated Resident #158 was bleeding and she applied first aid. During a family interview on 8/15/23 at 2:33 PM, the POA stated she was not notified on the evening Resident #158 fell. The POA stated the staff said the resident fell around 9:00 or 10:00 PM and they didn't call her until 6:30 AM to ask if she could go to the hospital. The POA stated the resident resided at the facility for 8 years and when the staff said they didn't want to bother her in the middle of the night, she asked the nurse when was 9:30 PM considered the middle of the night, but the staff would not answer her. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 9:05 AM, Staff H stated if anyone was found on the floor, he would expect the staff to look for any visible wounds, assess for pain in any extremity and if they had a visible head wound, there may be a hemorrhage so of course to call 911. Staff H stated the staff could call 24/7 to report a fall and receive orders for treatment. In a subsequent interview on 8/16/23 at 10:28 AM, Staff H, Physician stated a review of the call logs revealed that there was no call for a fall on Resident #158 and he did not remember receiving one. Staff H stated he found a fax dated 6/2/23 at 10:45 PM that documented Resident #158 was found on the floor on her right side, her range of motion and neuro's were normal, she had a hematoma and complained of pain all over. Staff H commented that looking at the fax, the staff should have called 911. Staff H stated another fax received on Monday 6/5/23 at 5:49 AM documented the resident transferred to the local hospital. Staff H said a 2nd fax received on 6/12/23 at 3:47 PM notified him of the resident's death, 2 hours after Resident #158 passed away. During an interview on 8/22/23 at 9:24 AM, Staff A, RN/Clinical Administrator, stated she checked for a text from Staff B on the evening of 6/2/23 and she did not get a text or call. Staff A stated she did not get a call until 6/3/23 at 6:30 am when she said to send Resident #158 to the hospital. During an interview on 8/22/23 at 2:30 PM, Staff L, Advanced Registered Nurse Practioner (ARNP), stated she remembered receiving a call on 6/3/23 from the nurse asking permission to send the resident to the hospital. Staff L reported she was on call for the providers in that area and at the hospital emergency room (ER). Staff L stated the staff did not call the physician when Resident #158 fell at 9:00 PM on 6/2/23. Staff L voiced the whole thing was not right as Staff B said they found the resident down, put her back to bed, and the resident didn't want to get up in the morning, so they needed permission to send her. Staff L stated the resident had a head injury, there was shortening of the resident's right leg and it was rotated outward, the resident guarded her right arm screaming if staff touched it, and they gave the resident nothing for her pain. Staff L stated the staff should have called the on-call provider at the time Resident #158 was found on the floor to seek treatment orders; the on-call providers take calls 24/7. The policy titled Fall Prevention and Management dated April 2021 revealed: a. The Clinical Administrator is responsible for assuring implementation of this policy. b. All staff are responsible for implementing the intent and directives contained within this policy. c. The Nurse will immediately evaluate the resident for any injury, change in status and/or pain and will proceed with emergency procedures and interventions as indicated. d. Suspected head injury or possible significant injury or fracture: the resident is not to be moved until emergency personnel have arrived unless it is determined that the resident is at risk for injuring self further or is at risk for further injury if they are not moved. e. The Nurse will notify 911, the Primary Physician and/or Nurse Practitioner (NP) and the RN in charge as indicated based on the initial evaluation and the resident care plan. f. The Staff Nurse will complete the resident Occurrence Report and notify the Physician and responsible party.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on personnel file review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to assure 1 of 5 staff reviewed met the requirements for Mandatory Adult Abuse Training (Staff D). The facility re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on personnel file review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to assure 1 of 5 staff reviewed met the requirements for Mandatory Adult Abuse Training (Staff D). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings Include: Record review of the personnel record for Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), shown a hire date of 1/4/22. Staff D completed the two-hour Dependent Adult Abuse Mandatory Training on 4/9/20. The Renewal training due to be completed by 4/9/23 was not documented. In an interview on 8/17/23 at 11:06 AM, Staff C, the Administrative Support Staff acknowledged the expectation for staff to complete the two-hour Dependent Adult Mandatory Reporter Training every three years. The facility Abuse Policy with a modified Date of January 2023, documented each employee shall be required to complete training including Iowa Dependent Adult Abuse Training for Iowa. The Iowa Department of Health and Human Services recorded, beginning 7/01/19 the two-hour Dependent Adult Abuse Training is required every three years for Mandatory Reporters.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete a follow-up Preadmi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete a follow-up Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for one out of one resident reviewed in the current sample who had a change in mental health diagnoses (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment at admission for resident #12, dated 7/1/21 included Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS recorded Resident #12 diagnoses included heart disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia of uncertain or unknown etiology. The MDS coded that antipsychotics were not given during the last seven days. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a BIMS score of 5 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive deficit. The MDS recorded Resident #12 diagnoses that included heart disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia of uncertain or unknown etiology with additional diagnosis added after admission of psychotic disorder with delusions due to physiological condition. The MDS coded that antipsychotics are given on a routine basis. The Care Plan completed 6/30/23 revealed Resident #12 at risk for behavioral health issues related to psychotic disorder with delusions. The Care Plan documented focus due to use of anti-psychotic medications. Resident to be free of drug related complications with interventions included to monitor and report reactions. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August 2023 completed up to August 16, 2023 revealed the resident was given the following medications daily related to psychotic disorder with delusions: a. Mirtazapine (antidepressant medication) Tablet 15 milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime b. Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication) 5 mg twice a day The Notice of PASRR Level 1 Screen outcome dated prior to admission to the nursing facility on 5/13/21 documented primary medical conditions requiring nursing facility included mild cognitive impairment. The Notice relayed no mental health diagnosis is known or suspected for Resident #12. The outcome section relayed no evidence of a serious behavioral condition. If changes occur, a new screening must be submitted. On 8/16/23 at 4:11 PM, Staff A, the Clinical Administrator, acknowledged a new PASRR screening should have been requested due to resident new mental health diagnosis after admission. The facility provided PASRR Policy modified November 2022 documented the federally mandated pre-screening process for facility admission to evaluate for mental disorders. The negative Level 1 ends the pre-screen process unless a possible serious mental disorder arises later.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide an Infection Preventionist with specialized training or certification to monitor and provide oversight for the facility's Inf...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide an Infection Preventionist with specialized training or certification to monitor and provide oversight for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings Include: The policy, entitled Infection Prevention and Control Manual and dated 2020, documented the facility Infection Preventionist is responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. On 8/16/23 at 9:31 AM, Staff B, Clinical Coordinator for Infection Control and Education, provided documentation that her Infection Preventionist Training was incomplete. Staff B demonstrated a lack of understanding of information necessary to complete her duties as the facility Infection Preventionist. Staff B indicated she took over the Infection Preventionionist role in June 2023. On 8/17/23 at 9:21 AM Staff A, Director of Nursing (DON), indicated the last certified Infection Preventionist left in May 2023.
Jun 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0886 (Tag F0886)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) COVID-19 testing requirements, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) COVID-19 testing requirements, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 partially vaccinated staff was tested for COVID-19 to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Staff B, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), who was not fully vaccinated, was tested for COVID-19 based on county transmission rates and during a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings Include: A review of the facility policy titled, COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Policy, revised on 02/03/2022, revealed To protect our Staff, residents, and guests by lowering the risk of acquiring or transmitting Sars-Cov-2 (COVID-19), and to comply with regulatory requirements, including rules issued by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), [the facility] has adopted this policy regarding COVID-19 vaccination .The following precautions apply to exempt unvaccinated staff in [the facility] . vi. Complete testing in the routine cadence as set forth in QSO-20-38-NH-Revised [Quality Safety & Oversight memorandum from CMS] which is based upon the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] County Transmission Rate .vii. Complete outbreak testing as indicated by positive case exposure at the individual site. A review of QSO-20-38-NH CMS Memorandum, dated 08/26/2020, revealed Routine testing of staff, who are not up-to-date, should be based on the extent of the virus in the community .Facilities should use their community transmission level as the trigger for staff testing frequency .The facility should test all staff, who are not up-to-date, at the frequency prescribed in the Routine Testing table based on the level of community transmission reported in the past week. Facilities should monitor their level of community transmission every other week (e.g., first and third Monday of every month) and adjust the frequency of performing staff testing according to the table above. According to the Routine Testing Table, if the Level of COVID-19 community transmission was high (red) or substantial (orange), the minimum testing frequency of staff who were not up-to-date was required twice per week. If the transmission rate was moderate (yellow), minimum testing was once a week. No testing was recommended if the transmission rate was low (blue). Continued review of QSO-20-38-NH CMS Memorandum revealed, Testing of Staff and Residents During an Outbreak Investigation A new COVID-19 infection in any staff or any nursing home-onset COVID-19 infection in a resident triggers an outbreak investigation. In an outbreak investigation, rapid identification and isolation of new cases is critical in stopping further viral transmission .Upon identification of a single new case of COVID-19 infection in any staff or residents, testing should begin immediately. Facilities have the option to perform outbreak testing through two approaches, contact tracing or broad-based (e.g. facility-wide) testing. A review of Iowa COVID-19 Tracker, retrieved from https://iowacovid19tracker.org/, revealed in February 2022 through 03/14/2022, the transmission rate for the county where the facility was located was high (red). The transmission rate for 04/04/2022, 04/18/2022, and 05/02/2022 was high (red) or substantial (orange). On 05/16/2022, the transmission rate had dropped to moderate (yellow). A review of emails to residents and families revealed on 02/02/2022, the Administrator sent an email notification that a resident had tested positive for COVID-19 on 02/01/2022. According to the email, We will continue to test all [facility] staff regardless of vaccination status twice per week. Further review of emails revealed on 02/06/2022, another five residents tested positive, a staff member tested positive on 02/05/2022, and the facility remained in outbreak status. Continued review of emails to residents and families revealed on 03/04/2022, a total of 15 staff and 16 residents had tested positive for COVID-19 and there had been three resident deaths after testing positive. The email revealed the facility would remain in outbreak status until 03/16/2022, if no additional residents tested positive and would continue to test unvaccinated staff twice per week. According to an email to residents and families dated 03/17/2022, the outbreak status was completed because of going 28 days without an additional resident testing positive for COVID-19. The email revealed the facility would continue to test unvaccinated staff twice weekly. A review of a COVID-19 Vaccine Record Card revealed Staff B, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), received the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine on 11/23/2021. There was no documented evidence Staff B received the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. A review of Staff B's work schedule revealed the CNA began working on 01/29/2022 and continued to work through May 2022. A review of a Testing Log for the week of 01/24/2022 to 01/30/2022 revealed the facility tested Staff B for COVID-19 on 01/29/2022 and the result was negative. There was no other documented evidence the facility tested Staff B for COVID-19 from February through May 2022. An interview with Staff B on 06/02/2022 at 2:27 PM, revealed prior to 06/02/2022, Staff B had not received a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Staff B stated when he/she worked at the facility, Staff B wore a N95 mask and goggles. A follow-up interview to discuss COVID-19 testing was attempted with Staff B on 06/03/2022 at 10:00 AM. Staff B did not return the phone call. During an interview on 06/03/2022 at 12:26 PM, Staff A, the Infection Control and Prevention Specialist, indicated she was not aware that Staff B was not being tested for COVID-19 according to the county positivity rate. Staff A stated it was Staff E, the Health Unit Coordinator's responsibility to keep up with staff testing. A follow-up interview with Staff A on 06/03/2022 at 2:19 PM, revealed positivity rates were posted at the time clock and when the county positivity rate was high, all unvaccinated staff and staff who were not up-to-date on vaccines were required to test two times per week. Staff A indicated that Staff F, the Office Manager/Human Resources, was monitoring testing and was responsible for adding staff names who required testing to a list. During an interview on 06/03/2022 at 12:40 PM, Staff E, the Health Unit Coordinator, revealed it was her responsibility to enter staff names on a master list and to highlight the names of staff members who were unvaccinated. She indicated that Staff B's name was left off the list in error. Staff E stated she was not responsible for ensuring staff were tested for COVID-19. Staff F was on vacation and unavailable for an interview. During an interview on 06/03/2022 at 1:30 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed facility Corporate Staff had Human Resources handle COVID-19 vaccination compliance. The DON stated she was not aware Staff B was not fully vaccinated, as the facility staff were not being kept updated on vaccination status. The DON indicated the facility process for COVID-19 testing for unvaccinated staff included keeping a list of staff who required testing and posting the list at the time clock. The DON indicated she was not aware Staff B was not being tested for COVID-19. During an interview on 06/03/2022 at 2:06 PM, the Administrator stated on 05/16/2022, the Administrator notified Human Resources that Staff B was not up to date on vaccinations; however, the Administrator was not aware Staff B had not completed a second vaccine nor that Staff B was not being tested. The Administrator stated he was under the impression that Human Resources had taken care of it, but stated it was the Administrator's responsibility to ensure testing was being completed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0888 (Tag F0888)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 Vaccination Policies and Procedures for staff included a required component whereby the facility ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 Vaccination Policies and Procedures for staff included a required component whereby the facility had formulated and implemented a process to ensure all staff (except those who have been granted an exemption or have a temporary delay) were fully vaccinated for COVID-19. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure one of one staff member (Staff B, a Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA]), was fully vaccinated prior to the deadline of 03/15/2022. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Policy, revised on 02/03/2022, revealed the facility did not address the facility's process to ensure all staff were fully vaccinated for COVID-19. A review of QSO-22-09-ALL CMS memorandum, dated 01/14/2022, revealed, Vaccination Enforcement - Surveying for Compliance .Within 60 days after the issuance of this memorandum, if the facility demonstrates that: Policies and procedures are developed and implemented for ensuring all facility staff, regardless of clinical responsibility or patient or resident contact are vaccinated for COVID-19; and .Less than 100% of all staff received at least one dose of a single-dose vaccine, or all doses of a multiple-dose vaccine series, or have been granted a qualifying exemption, or identified as having a temporary delay as recommended by the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], the facility is non-compliant under the rule. According to this memorandum, 100% of facility staff needed be vaccinated or have an exemption after 03/15/2022. A review of the facility's formula for Staff Vaccination Rate revealed 99.3% of facility staff members were fully vaccinated. A review of Staff B's COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card revealed that on 11/23/2021, Staff B received the first dose of a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series. The card indicated a second dose had not been administered. A review of Staff B's Personnel Record revealed Staff B was hired by the facility on 01/19/2022. A review of Staff B's work schedule revealed the following: a. Staff B worked five days in March 2022 (four of those days were following the vaccination deadline). b. Staff B worked seven days in April 2022. c. Staff B worked eight days in May 2022. During a telephone interview on 06/02/2022 at 2:27 PM, Staff B revealed when she received her first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, she became ill and was not sure if she was going to get the second dose. She indicated that when she was hired, the facility provided information on the medical and religious exemptions. Staff B indicated that she did not remember the facility giving her a deadline to get the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Staff B indicated that she had been busy attending nursing school and was unable to come to the facility to get the second dose or get it from a Pharmacy or Doctor's Office. Staff B stated that the facility provided her with information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Staff B further indicated that when she worked at the facility on the weekend, she wore an N95 face mask and goggles. During an interview on 06/03/2022 at 10:30 AM, Staff A, Infection Control and Prevention Specialist, indicated that she was aware that Staff B was working and was not fully vaccinated. Staff A indicated that she contacted Staff B on 06/02/2022 to come in for the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Staff A indicated that Human Resources and Employee Health were involved with making sure that the staff members were fully vaccinated. She further indicated that Employee Health tracked vaccinations. Staff A indicated that moving forward the facility would provide newly hired staff members with the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, and during that period, would do training remotely and would have no patient-care contact until two weeks following the second dose of a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine. She indicated that in the event a staff member declined to be vaccinated, the facility would provide information regarding possible COVID-19 vaccination exemption. A review of text messages revealed that Staff B was contacted on 02/24/2022 and 05/16/2022 to come into the facility to receive the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. During a telephone interview on 06/03/2022 at 11:40 AM, Staff D, Employee Health Nurse Manager (from the Corporate Office), indicated the Human Resource Department was responsible for tracking COVID-19 vaccination status for staff members. Staff D indicated that it was the Human Resource Department that was responsible, during the initial hiring period, to give the staff members the information regarding COVID-19 vaccines. Staff D indicated that Staff F, Office Manager/Human Resources, recently reached out to Staff B and provided places where she could get the COVID-19 vaccine, to include the local Pharmacy, medical provider, and at the facility. Staff F was on vacation during the survey and was unavailable for interview. During an interview on 06/02/2022 at 4:33 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that moving forward all employees would be required to be fully vaccinated or have an approved exemption prior to being hired. During an interview on 06/02/2022 at 4:33 PM, the Administrator indicated that the facility would only employ staff that were fully vaccinated or have an exemption. The Administrator indicated that Staff B was scheduled to come in to get the second dose but did not show up. The Administrator further indicated that one employee was terminated due not getting the COVID-19 vaccine and/or applying for an exemption. The Administrator stated that the facility offered the COVID-19 vaccine (two-dose series) on a weekly basis.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 34% turnover. Below Iowa's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), $36,752 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 11 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $36,752 in fines. Higher than 94% of Iowa facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (29/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Iowa, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc Staffed?

CMS rates Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 34%, compared to the Iowa average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc?

State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC during 2022 to 2024. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 8 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc?

Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 59 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Williamsburg, Iowa.

How Does Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc Compare to Other Iowa Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Iowa, Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (34%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Iowa. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc Stick Around?

Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC has a staff turnover rate of 34%, which is about average for Iowa nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc Ever Fined?

Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC has been fined $36,752 across 1 penalty action. The Iowa average is $33,446. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Highland Ridge Care Center, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?

Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.