ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Anthony Community Care Center in Anthony, Kansas, has a Trust Grade of B, which means it is considered a good choice for families seeking care, indicating solid performance but with some room for improvement. It ranks #2 out of 295 facilities in Kansas, placing it in the top tier, and is #1 of 2 in Harper County, which means there is only one local facility ranked higher. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 1 in 2024 to 2 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, with a 5/5 star rating and only 28% turnover, significantly lower than the state average of 48%, which suggests that staff are experienced and familiar with the residents. On the downside, the facility has had critical incidents, such as allowing residents to hold lit fireworks, resulting in a resident sustaining a burn injury, as well as concerns about inadequate training for staff and missing annual performance reviews, which could impact the quality of care provided. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and quality ratings, families should be aware of the recent incidents and ongoing issues.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Kansas
- #2/295
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Kansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kansas. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Low Staff Turnover (28%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (28%)
20 points below Kansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
No Significant Concerns Identified
This facility shows no red flags. Among Kansas's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0947
(Tag F0947)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) staff, CNA G, CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q, and Social Services Designee (SSD)/CNA K, who worked in the facility for over a year,...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 23 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement, including an annual ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility census totaled 25 residents with three residents sampled for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 20 residents with 12 residents sampled, including six residents reviewed for accidents. Based ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - Review of Resident (R)15's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of retention of urine (inability to pass urine...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 20 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents/re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 20 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for five of the five Ce...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 20 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store, prepare and distribute food under sanitary conditions to ensu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The resident reported a census of 20 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2021
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility had a census of 23 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one resident who used...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - Resident (R)174's signed Physician Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 09/09/21 documented the following diagno...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - Resident (R)174's signed Physician Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 09/09/21 documented the following diagno...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility census totaled 23 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility census totaled 23 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 23 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary services to decrease the risk...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility had a census of 23 residents, with 12 residents sampled, and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility had a census of 23 residents with 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)9's as nee...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 23 residents with 22 residents who received meals from the main kitchen. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to have adequate staff to carry out all fun...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 23 residents with 22 residents receiving meals from one main kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare, store and handle f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kansas facilities.
- • 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Kansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 19 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
About This Facility
What is Anthony Community's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Anthony Community Staffed?
CMS rates ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 28%, compared to the Kansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Anthony Community?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER during 2021 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 17 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Anthony Community?
ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 30 certified beds and approximately 25 residents (about 83% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ANTHONY, Kansas.
How Does Anthony Community Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (28%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Anthony Community?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Anthony Community Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Anthony Community Stick Around?
Staff at ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 28%, the facility is 18 percentage points below the Kansas average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 20%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Anthony Community Ever Fined?
ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Anthony Community on Any Federal Watch List?
ANTHONY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.