BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Belleville Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center has a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns regarding the quality of care provided. They rank #177 out of 295 facilities in Kansas, placing them in the bottom half, and #1 out of 1 in Republic County means they are the only available option in that area. The trend is worsening, with the number of issues reported increasing from 3 in 2023 to 12 in 2024. Staffing is rated average with a 3 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 54%, which is similar to the state average, suggesting some staff stability but not exceptional. However, the facility has incurred fines totaling $46,770, which is concerning, as it is higher than 83% of Kansas facilities. In terms of RN coverage, they have more RN presence than 85% of facilities in the state, which is a positive aspect as RNs can catch issues that CNAs might miss. Specific incidents of concern include a resident not receiving prescribed antibiotics for a urinary tract infection, which poses a significant health risk, and another resident experiencing unintended weight loss due to inadequate nutritional support and lack of monitoring. Additionally, the facility does not have a certified dietary manager in place, potentially compromising residents' nutritional needs. Overall, while there are some strengths, particularly in RN staffing, the overall quality and compliance issues raise serious concerns for families considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Kansas
- #177/295
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 54% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $46,770 in fines. Lower than most Kansas facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 50 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kansas. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 29 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Kansas average (2.9)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Kansas avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 29 deficiencies on record
Dec 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 34 residents with three residents reviewed for unintended weight loss. Based on record revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The facility identified 11 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resista...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included three residents, with three reviewed for abuse. Based on observat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and intervi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility had a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to treat two unsampled residents with dignity when ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility had a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to handle soiled linen in a sanitary manner to preve...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen's plate warmer and prep sink ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the refrigerator seals were intact and ai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility lacked evidence the required infection preventionist attended the Qualit...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 38 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility identified a census of 38 residents with three reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The sample included four residents. Based on observations, record review, and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Base...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 39 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to monitor and adhere to cleaning and disinfecting s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 39 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a backflow device (prevent unwanted flow of water in the reverse direction)...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2021
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with four reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 13 resident, with seven reviewed for unnecessary medication. Base...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Base...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with seven reviewed for unnecessary medications. Ba...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with seven reviewed for unnecessary medications. Ba...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to repair two of 35 residents' wheelchairs, Resident (R) 23 and R27, and one of two d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff person designated as the Infection Preventionist, who was responsible for the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post daily nurse staffing information and keep records of the staffing posted for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a full time certified dietary manager for the 43 reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $46,770 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 29 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $46,770 in fines. Higher than 94% of Kansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (28/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Staffed?
CMS rates BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 54%, compared to the Kansas average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center?
State health inspectors documented 29 deficiencies at BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2021 to 2024. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 25 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center?
BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 62 certified beds and approximately 44 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BELLEVILLE, Kansas.
How Does Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (54%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?
BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 54%, which is 8 percentage points above the Kansas average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?
BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $46,770 across 4 penalty actions. The Kansas average is $33,547. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?
BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.