HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER

403 S VALLEY, CUNNINGHAM, KS 67035 (620) 298-2781
For profit - Corporation 45 Beds AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
80/100
#19 of 295 in KS
Last Inspection: April 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Hilltop Manor Nursing Center in Cunningham, Kansas, has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #19 out of 295 facilities in Kansas, placing it in the top half, and is the best option in Kingman County. The facility is improving, with a reduction in reported issues from five in 2022 to four in 2024. Staffing is rated average with a 3 out of 5 stars, and turnover is at 58%, which is higher than the state average but still typical for the industry. Notably, there have been no fines, indicating good compliance; however, there are some concerns, including a serious incident where a resident experienced a fall with injury and issues around food safety where undated items were found in the kitchen. Overall, while Hilltop Manor has strengths such as its high overall star rating and lack of fines, families should be aware of the staffing turnover and specific incidents that could impact care quality.

Trust Score
B+
80/100
In Kansas
#19/295
Top 6%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
5 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kansas facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Kansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
○ Average
10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 5 issues
2024: 4 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 58%

12pts above Kansas avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Chain: AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (58%)

10 points above Kansas average of 48%

The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Apr 2024 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - The electronic medical record for R22 documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - The electronic medical record for R22 documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), glaucoma (abnormal condition of elevated pressure within an eye caused by obstruction to the outflow), and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV- brief episodes of mild to intense dizziness after a change in head position). R22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 09/04/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R22 required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLS). R22 had no history of falls before admission. R22's Quarterly MDS dated 02/28/24 documented a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R22 required supervision with transfers from a chair and walking. R22 used a walker to assist with mobility. R22 had one fall without injury and one fall with injury since the prior assessment. R22's ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 09/11/23 documented she was working with therapy to regain strength and improve balance and gait while avoiding complications such as falls. R22's Fall CAA dated 09/11/23 documented R22 had an unsteady gait and poor balance. The plan was to minimize the risks and avoidance of complications such as injuries related to falls. R22's Care Plan last updated 04/01/24 directed staff that R22 required stand-by assist staff with transfers and walking. R22 was independent with walking in her room. R22's care plan lacked interventions directing staff regarding falls. A fall investigation dated 10/11/23 documented R22 had an unwitnessed fall without injury in her room. R22 was found on the floor next to her bed by a staff member. Staff discussed the importance of a night light with the resident and advised R22 that her bathroom light could be left on, and the door cracked to allow light in. The investigation lacked a root cause analysis. A fall investigation dated 11/12/23 documented R22 had an unwitnessed fall that resulted in a hematoma to the back of her head. R22 was found on the floor in her room in front of her recliner; she had no bottom garments or shoes on. R22 stated she got up to go to the bathroom and was leaving the bathroom to find some pull-ups and slipped and fell. R22 was assessed by the nurse, and staff notified the physician and daughter of the incident. The fall investigation lacked a root cause analysis and new fall intervention. A fall investigation dated 11/27/23 documented R22 had an unwitnessed fall without injuries in her room. R22 was calling out for help and was found on the floor next to her bed. R22 stated there were kidnappers in her room. R22 was confused. R22 complained of pain in her left knee. The nurse completed a thorough assessment and obtained vital signs. R22 was returned to bed with assistance from three staff. Staff notified R22's physician and family. The physician ordered a urinalysis (lab analysis of urine). The fall investigation lacked a root cause analysis or new fall intervention. A fall investigation dated 12/04/23 at 03:15 AM documented R22 was found in her room on the floor next to her bed by staff. R22 complained of pain in her back after she hit it on her bed when she fell. The nurse came to assist and assess the resident. R22 stated she wanted to get up to her chair, so she stood, took a few steps, and fell. Staff notified R22's representative of the fall. The investigation noted the resident has had increased confusion and a decline in mobility. Staff notified the physician and received orders for a urinalysis and lab draw. The investigation lacked a root cause analysis and an update to the care plan. A fall investigation dated 12/04/23 at 01:30 PM documented R22 had an unwitnessed fall in her room that resulted in a skin tear to her right elbow. R22 was found on the floor by the medication aide on her right side near her bathroom. R22's walker was tipped over. R22 was assessed by the nurse and the physician was notified. Staff received an order to send R22 to be evaluated at the emergency room (ER). R22 stated she got up to get ready for her appointment. R22's representative was notified and voiced concern about R22's recent decline. R22's room was moved closer to the nurse station. R22's ER visit showed R22 had a urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). The investigation lacked a root cause analysis and an update to the care plan. On 04/02/24 R22 walked with her walker to the dining room with a slow unsteady gait. On 04/03/24 at 08:00 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated when a resident had a fall typically the resident was assessed, an investigation was conducted, and witness statements were obtained by any witnesses. LN G stated then the interdisciplinary team (IDT) would meet and come up with a new intervention for the fall. On 04/04/24 at 09:04 AM Administrative Nurse D stated R22 has had a few falls recently. Administrative Nurse D stated after a fall the nurse would assess the resident, the physician and family would be notified, and then witness statements would be obtained so the IDT team could further investigate the incident. Administrative Nurse D stated the investigation includes finding the cause and coming up with new interventions to avoid further falls. The Accident/Incident Committee policy documented a meeting would be held within a reasonable timeframe with the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant DON, and any other pertinent department managers. The committee should meet where the incident occurred to visualize any environmental issues that may have led to the incident. The committee would review the incident report to ensure all areas were completed. The post-fall assessment would be reviewed. The care plan would be reviewed to ensure immediate interventions were put into place after the incident. The committee would complete and update the fall risk assessment. Any additional interventions that have been made to the resident's plan of care would be communicated to the direct care staff by the DON or designee. The log of the accidents and incidents would be taken to Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for review. The facility failed to ensure staff completed a thorough fall investigation for R22 which included a root cause analysis for the fall and failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent further falls. This deficient practice places R22 at risk of further fall and possible injury. The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify causal factors for falls, provide adequate supervision, and implement effective interventions to prevent avoidable accidents for Resident R (32) when he had multiple falls over various dates, which resulted in fractures, contusions, increased pain, and multiple trips to the hospital. The facility also failed to identify causal factors and implement interventions to prevent falls for R22. These failures caused actual harm to R32 and placed R22 and other residents at risk for continued accidents and injuries. Findings included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness) with severe psychotic (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception) symptoms, generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, and nondisplaced intertrochanteric (upper portion of thigh bone) fracture of left femur (thigh bone). R32's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented staff assessed the resident with moderately impaired cognition; R32 had no delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by gross impairment in reality perception), or behaviors exhibited. R32 had a functional range of motion impairment on the lower extremity on one side and used a wheelchair. The MDS further documented R32 as dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, personal hygiene, dressing lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, and mobility. R32 was incontinent of urine and bowel. The MDS recorded R32 had nonverbal indicators of pain and received scheduled pain medication. R32 had one fall with a major injury, and a recent surgery requiring active Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) services for a repaired fracture of the pelvis, hip, leg, knee, or ankle. The Fall Care Area Assessment dated 10/01/23 documented R32 at increased risk for falls due to advancing Parkinson's disease and noted the resident tended to walk the halls and forgot to use a walker at times. The overall objective in care planning for falls was avoidance through minimization of risks such as ensuring proper footwear, ensuring clothes were clean, dry, and not wet with urine, and reminding R32 to use a walker. R32's Care Plan, dated 09/20/22, documented R32 admitted from the home setting to Long Term Care (LTC) due to an increased need for assistance with personal care and increasingly unsteady gait resulting in multiple falls, all related to a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. The care plan directed staff to frequently monitor R32's whereabouts, monitor R32 when ambulating, and remind him to use his walker; if R32's gait appeared unsteady, ask him to sit down for a few minutes until he calmed down and could proceed safely. R32's Care Plan, dated 02/16/24, documented R32 had an increased risk for falls related to impetuous behavior. The care plan directed staff to place the resident's bed in a low position with assist rails, place a fall mat, use a soft touch call light, provide frequent monitoring of whereabouts, and R32 would attend physical and occupational therapy. The care plan further directed staff to transfer R32 with the assistance of two staff and utilize a wheelchair for mobility; R32 was toe-touch weight-bearing status. The care plan documented R32 was at risk for bleeding related to anticoagulation (a medication which prevents blood from clotting) medication and increased pain related to post-surgical hip repair. Review of R32's falls as documented from the EMR and Fall Investigation Summary revealed the following: On 07/08/23 at 05:05 PM, R32 hollered from his room and reported he slowly rolled out of bed, trying to use the toilet. R32 stated he had pain on the right side down where the ribs ended. The Fall Investigation Summary recorded a corrective action of staff education to assist the resident to the toilet after meals. On 07/12/23 at 04:10 AM staff heard R32 hollering and found him in his room next to the bed. The fall was not witnessed and R32 reported he was going from his chair to his bed. R32 reported pain in his back and right hip. R32 went to the emergency room and the x-ray showed there was no fracture. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 had a recent antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) decrease and orders to receive therapy services. The summary documented R32 had three falls in the past two weeks, and he reported the floor was slick. Staff mopped the floor and notified housekeeping to further clean the room. R32 had not been evaluated by therapy. The investigation documented nursing spoke to the therapists and asked them to evaluate R32 as soon as possible. On 07/17/23 at 04:45 PM, staff found R32 on the floor of his room. R32 reported he tripped on the slippery floor. The occurrence was not witnessed. R32 had a decreased range of motion to his left arm and guarding towards his left shoulder. At 11:00 PM, R32 returned from the emergency room with a diagnosis of a fractured clavicle (collarbone) to the left side; R32 wore a sling. No corrective action noted. On 07/28/23 at 10:00 PM, R32 was in the dining room and tried to ambulate without his walker. R32 leaned to his left side and lost balance. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 had been restless and was toileted and redirected several times. The summary further documented R32's family member was concerned about his recent falls. A corrective action documented that staff were educated to direct R32 to a chair that would be more appropriate, easier to get out of, and better for staff to monitor the resident to assist him in getting up due to his not asking for help. The care plan lacked the corrective action noted. On 08/17/23 at 01:10 AM R32 had an unwitnessed fall with complaints of neck and head pain and went to the emergency room. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 was found outside of the bathroom. His pants were wet on the floor, and he stated he was going to the bathroom. A corrective action documented that staff were educated to check, change, and toilet R32 on all rounds through the night. The summary documented rounds occurred at 11:00 PM, 01:00 AM, 03:00 AM, and 05:00 PM. The care plan lacked the corrective action noted. On 09/24/23 at 11:41 AM R32 was found sitting on the floor with his back against the door of the dining room bathroom. The fall was not witnessed and R32 reported he was hurt all over though no injury was found. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 had an unwitnessed fall in the dining room bathroom area and was unable to say what happened. R32 often walked around on his own, looking for the bathroom, and became unsteady while walking. A corrective action documented staff were educated to be more aware when R32 was up and walking around and to assist and direct the resident to his bathroom. The care plan lacked the corrective action noted. On 10/26/23 at 08:15 PM, R32 had an unwitnessed fall after he attempted to self-toilet and reported right elbow pain. R32 reported he was going to the bathroom due to being incontinent in his brief. The Fall Investigation Summary documented the fall was not witnessed. R32 was weak and had an unsteady gait possibly related to his COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus) diagnosis. A corrective action documented the resident was weak and would need therapy services when he was out of quarantine. On 01/05/24 at 03:00 AM R32 had an unwitnessed fall in his room while he was reaching for personal items. He was incontinent at the time of the fall. R32 had recent medication changes related to antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people) and antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medications. R32 had vocal complaints of right and left knee pain. The Fall Investigative Summary documented R32 was found lying on his back in his room and stated he was looking for a phone book. R32 had socks on. A corrective action documented that staff were directed to ensure R32 had non-skid socks on when in bed. The care plan lacked the corrective action noted. On 02/12/24 at 01:01 PM, R32 had a fall that was witnessed by another resident. R32 was getting up and transferring from the table. R32 complained of left hip and elbow pain and went to the emergency room. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 sat at a table drinking juice and another resident witnessed R32 stand and fall to the left side onto the floor. R32 complained of left hip and elbow pain, and staff sent him to the emergency room. R32 had a left hip fracture and left elbow contusion. A corrective action documented R32 was to work with therapy when he returned from the hospital. On 03/12/24 at 07:54 PM, staff found him lying on his left side with a large bulge to his left thigh area, and he complained of left elbow, thigh, and hip pain. R32 transferred himself from the wheelchair without the brakes on , and with the wheelchair footrest in the way at the time of the fall. R32 took an anticoagulant and needed to be transferred to the hospital. The Interdisciplinary Team Review Investigation documented R32 had severe cognitive impairment and was found on the floor after an unwitnessed event. The suspected root cause was while staff got R32 ready for bed, staff stepped out of his room to get help to transfer him, and R32 attempted to transfer himself. The investigation recommended an intervention to educate staff that the resident was not to be left alone in his room when he was in a wheelchair. The care plan lacked recommendations for intervention. The Progress Note dated 03/13/24, recorded R32 had a second surgical repair to his left hip. R32's Baseline Care Plan, dated 03/19/24 after readmission to the facility documented on return to the facility R32 had additional diagnoses of left basilar (lower lung area) infiltration and acute toxic metabolic encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure). On 04/03/24 at 02:40 PM observation revealed R32 in his room in bed and covered with blankets. R32 yelled out for assistance and tried to get out of bed. Staff responded and took R32 to the commons area and assisted him to a recliner between the nurses' station and dining room. On 04/03/24 at 01:12 PM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R along with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M assisted R32 from his wheelchair to his bed without bearing weight on the resident's left leg. R32's brief was changed due to urine incontinence. CMA R stated R32 was ambulatory and confused when he was admitted to the facility, and he had Parkinson's disease. CMA R said to prevent falls, staff assisted R32 to activities. CMA R said R32 was generally cooperative. CMA R said R32 would occasionally inform staff if he needed to have a bowel movement or be toileted, but otherwise, R32 was on a two-hour toileting schedule; he used a fall mat, had his bed in the lowest position, and should be checked frequently. On 04/04/24 at 09:30 AM, CNA N stated staff made sure R32 had his call light in reach, used a gait belt for transfers, and checked him frequently. CNA N said staff put R32's bed in the lowest position with a fall mat next to the bed, changed from wheelchair sitting to using a recliner, and staff toileted him before and after meals and during rounds. CNA N reported staff used verbal communication that to inform staff when residents fell, and staff checked the care plan in the nurses' station for any fall interventions. On 04/04/24 at 09:32 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G reported when a fall occurred, the nurse assessed the resident for injuries and signs of change; they notified the physician, family, and administration. LN G completed fall charting and the report was given to the Director of Nursing. LN G said staff were informed during the shift report about falls and looked at the working care plan for interventions. On 04/04/24 at 11:29 AM Administrative Nurse D verified the resident had repeated falls, which resulted in fractures and confirmed the resident's care plan was not updated with interventions by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to prevent further falls. The facility's Accident/Incident Committee policy, dated 11/20/20, is documented to review post-incident documentation to ensure that adequate interventions have been put in place to reduce the risk of future occurrences. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision, identify causal factors, and implement effective interventions to prevent R32 from multiple falls, which resulted in contusions, fractures, increased pain, and hospitalizations. These failures resulted in actual harm to R32 and placed the resident at risk for further falls with injuries.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record observation, record review, and int...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify Resident (R) 32's multiple unwitnessed falls with fractures as possible neglect and report to the State Agency (SA) as required. This placed the resident at risk for unidentified and/or ongoing abuse. Finding included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness) with severe psychotic (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception) symptoms, generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, and nondisplaced intertrochanteric (upper portion of thigh bone) fracture of left femur (thigh bone). R32's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that staff assessed the resident with moderately impaired cognition; R32 had no delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by gross impairment in reality perception), or behaviors exhibited. R32 had a functional range of motion impairment on the lower extremity on one side and used a wheelchair. The MDS further documented R32 as dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, personal hygiene, dressing lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, and mobility. R32 was incontinent of urine and bowel. The MDS recorded R32 had nonverbal indicators of pain and received scheduled pain medication. R32 had one fall with a major injury, and a recent surgery requiring active Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) services for a repaired fracture of the pelvis, hip, leg, knee, or ankle. The Fall Care Area Assessment dated 10/01/23 documented R32 at increased risk for falls due to advancing Parkinson's disease and noted the resident tended to walk the halls and forgot to use a walker at times. The overall objective in care planning for falls was avoidance through minimization of risks such as ensuring proper footwear, ensuring clothes were clean, dry, and not wet with urine, and reminding R32 to use a walker. R32's Care Plan, dated 09/20/22, documented R32 admitted from the home setting to Long Term Care (LTC) due to an increased need for assistance with personal care and increasingly unsteady gait resulting in multiple falls, all related to a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. The care plan directed staff to frequently monitor R32's whereabouts, monitor R32 when ambulating, and remind him to use his walker; if R32's gait appeared unsteady, ask him to sit down for a few minutes until he calmed down and could proceed safely. R32's Care Plan, dated 02/16/24, documented R32 had an increased risk for falls related to impetuous behavior. The care plan directed staff to place the resident's bed in a low position with assist rails, place a fall mat, use a soft touch call light, provide frequent monitoring of whereabouts, and R32 would attend physical and occupational therapy. The care plan further directed staff to transfer R32 with the assistance of two staff and utilize a wheelchair for mobility; R32 was toe-touch weight-bearing status. The care plan documented R32 was at risk for bleeding related to anticoagulation (a medication which prevents blood from clotting) medication and increased pain related to post-surgical hip repair. A review of R32's falls as documented in the EMR, and Fall Investigation Summary revealed the following: On 07/17/23 at 04:45 PM, staff found R32 on the floor of his room. R32 reported he tripped on the slippery floor. The occurrence was not witnessed. R32 had a decreased range of motion to his left arm and guarding towards his left shoulder. At 11:00 PM, R32 returned from the emergency room with a diagnosis of a fractured clavicle (collarbone) to the left side; R32 wore a sling. No corrective action was noted. The EMR and/or report lacked evidence the issue was identified as possible neglect and reported to the SA. On 09/24/23 at 11:41 AM R32 was found sitting on the floor with his back against the door of the dining room bathroom. The fall was not witnessed and R32 reported he was hurt all over though no injury was found. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 had an unwitnessed fall in the dining room bathroom area and was unable to say what happened. R32 often walked around on his own, looking for the bathroom, and became unsteady while walking. A corrective action documented staff were educated to be more aware when R32 was up and walking around and to assist and direct the resident to his bathroom. The care plan lacked the corrective action noted. The EMR and/or report lacked evidence the issue was identified as possible neglect and reported to the SA. On 03/12/24 at 07:54 PM, staff found him lying on his left side with a large bulge to his left thigh area, and he complained of left elbow, thigh, and hip pain. R32 transferred himself from the wheelchair without the brakes on and with the wheelchair footrest in the way at the time of the fall. R32 took an anticoagulant and needed to be transferred to the hospital. The Interdisciplinary Team Review Investigation documented R32 had severe cognitive impairment and was found on the floor after an unwitnessed event. The suspected root cause was while staff got R32 ready for bed, staff stepped out of his room to get help to transfer him, and R32 attempted to transfer himself. The investigation recommended an intervention to educate staff that the resident was not to be left alone in his room when he was in a wheelchair. The care plan lacked recommendations for intervention. The EMR and/or report lacked evidence the issue was identified as possible neglect and reported to the SA. The Progress Note dated 03/13/24, recorded R32 had a second surgical repair to his left hip. On 04/03/24 at 02:40 PM observation revealed R32 in his room in bed and covered with blankets. R32 yelled out for assistance and tried to get out of bed. Staff responded and took R32 to the commons area and assisted him to a recliner between the nurses' station and dining room. On 04/04/24 at 12:53 PM Administrative Staff A stated he had not reported R32's unwitnessed falls with major injury injuries because he felt there was no neglect or abuse. The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, dated 11/15/23, documented the facility will designate an Abuse Prevention Coordinator in the facility who is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation to the state survey agency and other officials in accordance with state law. Possible indicators of abuse include but are not limited to physical injury of a resident of unknown source. The administrator will follow up with government agencies, during business hours, to confirm the initial report was received, and to report the results of the investigation when final within five working days of the incident, as required by state agencies. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, SA, adult protective services, and all other required agencies within a specific timeframe: Immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation don not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. The facility failed to identify R32's multiple unwitnessed falls which resulted in fractures as potential neglect and report to the SA as required. This placed R32 at risk for unidentified and/or ongoing abuse or neglect.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents sampled for hospitalizatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents sampled for hospitalization and one resident sampled for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer as soon as practicable to Resident (R) 13 or their representative for their facility-initiated transfers and/or discharge. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunity for healthcare service for R13. Findings included: - The electronic medical record for R13 documented diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), and sepsis (a life-threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections which cause inflammation throughout the entire body). R13's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/01/24 documented R13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which indicated severely impaired cognition. R13 required substantial/maximal assistance and was dependent on staff for all her activities of daily living (ADLs). R13's Discharge MDS dated 03/17/24 had been initiated but was incomplete. R13's Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/15/24 documented R13 had a moderated cognitive impairment and had poor safety awareness. R13 had a history of falls and was dependent on staff for transfers and most daily care. R13 usually understood conversations and could usually make needs known. R13's Care Plan last revised 03/11/24 lacked staff direction regarding discharge. A Nurses Note dated 03/16/24 at 11:28 PM documented under the Progress Notes tab of the EMR recorded that frank blood was noted when R13 was changed at 10:42 PM. R13 was assessed by the nurse and a golf ball sized amount of blood was noted in R13's brief. The nurse obtained R13's vital signs. At 10:48 PM the hospital was called, and an order was received from the on-call physician to send R13 to the emergency department. A Clinical Admission note in the Progress Notes tab of the EMR dated 03/20/24 at 02:14 PM documented R13 arrived back at the facility by way of the facility van. The facility provided a signed Private Pay Bed Hold Authorization form dated and signed by R13's representative on 03/17/24 for R13's discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. The facility was unable to provide as requested the required written notification of transfer/discharge for R13's discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. On 04/02/24 at 12:35 PM, R13 sat at the dining table along with other residents eating her lunch. On 04/03/24 at 03:05 PM Social Services X stated she did complete the bed holds and notified the ombudsman when a resident was transferred out of the facility or was discharged . Social Services X stated she did not deal with the transfer or discharge paperwork, but the family was notified by phone call when a resident was sent out of the facility to the hospital. On 04/03/24 at 03:08 PM Administrative Nurse D stated a bed hold policy was given to the resident and their representative when the form was signed. Administrative Nurse D stated a phone call was made to the resident's representative when a resident was transferred out of the facility for any reason, but no written form of transfer or discharge was provided to the resident or their representative that she was aware of. The undated facility policy Transfer and Discharge documented the facility's transfer/discharge notice would be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner which they could understand. The notice would include the following at the time it was provided: The specific reason and basis for transfer and discharge. The effective date of transfer or discharge. The specific location to which the resident was to be transferred -or discharged . An explanation of the right to appeal the transfer or discharge to the State. The notice must be provided to the resident, the resident's representative if appropriate, and the LTC ombudsman as soon as practicable. The facility failed to provide written notice of transfer as soon as practicable to R13 or their representative for their facility-initiated transfers. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunity for healthcare service for R13.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - The electronic medical record for R22 documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - The electronic medical record for R22 documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), glaucoma (abnormal condition of elevated pressure within an eye caused by obstruction to the outflow), and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV- brief episodes of mild to intense dizziness after a change in head position). R22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 09/04/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R22 required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLS). R22 had no history of falls before admission. R22's Quarterly MDS dated 02/28/24 documented a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R22 required supervision with transfers from a chair and walking. R22 used a walker to assist with mobility. R22 had one fall without injury and one fall with injury since the prior assessment. R22's ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 09/11/23 documented she was working with therapy to regain strength and improve balance and gait while avoiding complications such as falls. R22's Fall CAA dated 09/11/23 documented that R22 had an unsteady gait and poor balance. The plan was to minimize the risks and avoidance of complications such as injuries related to falls. R22's Care Plan last updated 04/01/24 directed staff that R22 required stand-by assist staff with transfers and walking. R22 was independent with walking in her room. R22's care plan lacked interventions directing staff regarding falls. A fall investigation dated 10/11/23 documented R22 had an unwitnessed fall without injury in her room. R22 was found on the floor next to her bed by a staff member. Staff discussed the importance of a night light with the resident and advised R22 that her bathroom light could be left on, and the door cracked to allow light in. The investigation lacked a root cause analysis. A fall investigation dated 11/12/23 documented R22 had an unwitnessed fall that resulted in a hematoma to the back of her head. R22 was found on the floor in her room in front of her recliner; she had no bottom garments or shoes on. R22 stated she got up to go to the bathroom and was leaving the bathroom to find some pull-ups and slipped and fell. R22 was assessed by the nurse, and staff notified the physician and daughter of the incident. The fall investigation lacked a root cause analysis and new fall intervention. A fall investigation dated 11/27/23 documented R22 had an unwitnessed fall without injuries in her room. R22 was calling out for help and was found on the floor next to her bed. R22 stated there were kidnappers in her room. R22 was confused. R22 complained of pain in her left knee. The nurse completed a thorough assessment and obtained vital signs. R22 was returned to bed with assistance from three staff. Staff notified R22's physician and family. The physician ordered a urinalysis (lab analysis of urine). The fall investigation lacked a root cause analysis or new fall intervention. A fall investigation dated 12/04/23 at 03:15 AM documented R22 was found in her room on the floor next to her bed by staff. R22 complained of pain in her back after she hit it on her bed when she fell. The nurse came to assist and assess the resident. R22 stated she wanted to get up to her chair, so she stood, took a few steps, and fell. Staff notified R22's representative of the fall. The investigation noted the resident has had increased confusion and a decline in mobility. Staff notified the physician and received orders for a urinalysis and lab draw. The investigation lacked a root cause analysis and an update to the care plan. A fall investigation dated 12/04/23 at 01:30 PM documented R22 had an unwitnessed fall in her room that resulted in a skin tear to her right elbow. R22 was found on the floor by the medication aide on her right side near her bathroom. R22's walker was tipped over. R22 was assessed by the nurse and the physician was notified. Staff received an order to send R22 to be evaluated at the emergency room (ER). R22 stated she got up to get ready for her appointment. R22's representative was notified and voiced concern about R22's recent decline. R22's room was moved closer to the nurse station. R22's ER visit showed R22 had a urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). The investigation lacked a root cause analysis and an update to the care plan. On 04/02/24 R22 walked with her walker to the dining room with a slow unsteady gait. On 04/04/24 at 09:42 Administrative Nurse F stated she was responsible for updating the care plans after the MDS was completed, but all nurses were able to update the care plan as needed after a fall or anything like that. On 04/04/24 at 12:13 AM Administrative Nurse D stated she was not aware that R22's care plan had not been updated with the new interventions put in place for R22 after her falls. Administrative Nurse D stated she would speak with staff to educate them and ensure that fall interventions were added to R22's care plan. The Resident Centered Care Plan Process policy last updated 03/28/18 documented at 90-day intervals, or more frequently based on the response to the resident's condition the interdisciplinary team would evaluate the resident's progress toward meeting the goals of care, treatment, and services. Revise the plan for care, treatment, and services. Collaborate with the resident and representative and family in reviewing and revising the plan for care, treatment, and services. The resident had the right to request revisions to their plan of care. The MDS/Care Plan Coordinator would serve as the coordinator for the care planning process. The interdisciplinary team would collaborate on the review and revision of the plan for care, treatment, and services. The facility failed to revise R22's Care Plan with interventions to prevent further falls. This deficient practice placed R22 at risk of further falls due to uncommunicated care needs. The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with effective interventions for Resident (R) 32 and R22 who had falls with injuries. This placed R32 and R22 at risk for ongoing falls and injury due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness) with severe psychotic (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception) symptoms, generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, and nondisplaced intertrochanteric (upper portion of thigh bone) fracture of left femur (thigh bone). R32's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented staff assessed the resident with moderately impaired cognition; R32 had no delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by gross impairment in reality perception), or behaviors exhibited. R32 had a functional range of motion impairment on the lower extremity on one side and used a wheelchair. The MDS further documented R32 as dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, personal hygiene, dressing lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, and mobility. R32 was incontinent of urine and bowel. The MDS recorded R32 had nonverbal indicators of pain and received scheduled pain medication. R32 had one fall with a major injury, and a recent surgery requiring active Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) services for a repaired fracture of the pelvis, hip, leg, knee, or ankle. The Fall Care Area Assessment dated 10/01/23 documented R32 at increased risk for falls due to advancing Parkinson's disease and noted the resident tended to walk the halls and forgot to use a walker at times. The overall objective in care planning for falls was avoidance through minimization of risks such as ensuring proper footwear, ensuring clothes were clean, dry, and not wet with urine, and reminding R32 to use a walker. R32's Care Plan, dated 09/20/22, documented R32 admitted from the home setting to Long Term Care (LTC) due to an increased need for assistance with personal care and increasingly unsteady gait resulting in multiple falls, all related to a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. The care plan directed staff to frequently monitor R32's whereabouts, monitor R32 when ambulating, and remind him to use his walker; if R32's gait appeared unsteady, ask him to sit down for a few minutes until he calmed down and could proceed safely. R32's Care Plan, dated 02/16/24, documented R32 had an increased risk for falls related to impetuous behavior. The care plan directed staff to place the resident's bed in a low position with assist rails, place a fall mat, use a soft touch call light, provide frequent monitoring of whereabouts, and R32 would attend physical and occupational therapy. The care plan further directed staff to transfer R32 with the assistance of two staff and utilize a wheelchair for mobility; R32 was toe-touch weight-bearing status. The care plan documented R32 was at risk for bleeding related to anticoagulation (a medication which prevents blood from clotting) medication and increased pain related to post-surgical hip repair. A review of R32's falls as documented from the EMR, and Fall Investigation Summary revealed the following: On 07/08/23 at 05:05 PM, R32 hollered from his room and reported he slowly rolled out of bed, trying to use the toilet. R32 stated he had pain on the right side down where the ribs ended. The Fall Investigation Summary recorded a corrective action of staff education to assist the resident to the toilet after meals. On 07/12/23 at 04:10 AM staff heard R32 hollering and found him in his room next to the bed. The fall was not witnessed and R32 reported he was going from his chair to his bed. R32 reported pain in his back and right hip. R32 went to the emergency room and the x-ray showed there was no fracture. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 had a recent antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) decrease and orders to receive therapy services. The summary documented R32 had three falls in the past two weeks, and he reported the floor was slick. Staff mopped the floor and notified housekeeping to further clean the room. R32 had not been evaluated by therapy. The investigation documented nursing spoke to the therapists and asked them to evaluate R32 as soon as possible. On 07/17/23 at 04:45 PM, staff found R32 on the floor of his room. R32 reported he tripped on the slippery floor. The occurrence was not witnessed. R32 had a decreased range of motion to his left arm and guarding towards his left shoulder. At 11:00 PM, R32 returned from the emergency room with a diagnosis of a fractured clavicle (collarbone) to the left side; R32 wore a sling. No corrective action was noted. On 07/28/23 at 10:00 PM, R32 was in the dining room and tried to ambulate without his walker. R32 leaned to his left side and lost balance. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 had been restless and was toileted and redirected several times. The summary further documented R32's family member was concerned about his recent falls. A corrective action documented that staff were educated to direct R32 to a chair that would be more appropriate, easier to get out of, and better for staff to monitor the resident to assist him in getting up due to his not asking for help. The care plan lacked the corrective action noted. On 08/17/23 at 01:10 AM R32 had an unwitnessed fall with complaints of neck and head pain and went to the emergency room. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 was found outside of the bathroom. His pants were wet on the floor, and he stated he was going to the bathroom. A corrective action documented that staff were educated to check, change, and toilet R32 on all rounds through the night. The summary documented rounds occurred at 11:00 PM, 01:00 AM, 03:00 AM, and 05:00 PM. The care plan lacked the corrective action noted. On 09/24/23 at 11:41 AM R32 was found sitting on the floor with his back against the door of the dining room bathroom. The fall was not witnessed and R32 reported he was hurt all over though no injury was found. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 had an unwitnessed fall in the dining room bathroom area and was unable to say what happened. R32 often walked around on his own, looking for the bathroom, and became unsteady while walking. A corrective action documented staff were educated to be more aware when R32 was up and walking around and to assist and direct the resident to his bathroom. The care plan lacked the corrective action noted. On 10/26/23 at 08:15 PM, R32 had an unwitnessed fall after he attempted to self-toilet and reported right elbow pain. R32 reported he was going to the bathroom due to being incontinent in his brief. The Fall Investigation Summary documented the fall was not witnessed. R32 was weak and had an unsteady gait possibly related to his COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus) diagnosis. A corrective action documented the resident was weak and would need therapy services when he was out of quarantine. On 01/05/24 at 03:00 AM R32 had an unwitnessed fall in his room while he was reaching for personal items. He was incontinent at the time of the fall. R32 had recent medication changes related to antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people) and antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medications. R32 had vocal complaints of right and left knee pain. The Fall Investigative Summary documented R32 was found lying on his back in his room and stated he was looking for a phone book. R32 had socks on. A corrective action documented that staff were directed to ensure R32 had non-skid socks on when in bed. The care plan lacked the corrective action noted. On 02/12/24 at 01:01 PM, R32 had a fall that was witnessed by another resident. R32 was getting up and transferring from the table. R32 complained of left hip and elbow pain and went to the emergency room. The Fall Investigation Summary documented R32 sat at a table drinking juice and another resident witnessed R32 stand and fall to the left side onto the floor. R32 complained of left hip and elbow pain, and staff sent him to the emergency room. R32 had a left hip fracture and left elbow contusion. A corrective action documented R32 was to work with therapy when he returned from the hospital. On 03/12/24 at 07:54 PM, staff found him lying on his left side with a large bulge to his left thigh area, and he complained of left elbow, thigh, and hip pain. R32 transferred himself from the wheelchair without the brakes on and with the wheelchair footrest in the way at the time of the fall. R32 took an anticoagulant and needed to be transferred to the hospital. The Interdisciplinary Team Review Investigation documented R32 had severe cognitive impairment and was found on the floor after an unwitnessed event. The suspected root cause was while staff got R32 ready for bed, staff stepped out of his room to get help to transfer him, and R32 attempted to transfer himself. The investigation recommended an intervention to educate staff that the resident was not to be left alone in his room when he was in a wheelchair. The care plan lacked recommendations for intervention. The Progress Note dated 03/13/24, recorded R32 had a second surgical repair to his left hip. R32's Baseline Care Plan, dated 03/19/24 after readmission to the facility documented on return to the facility R32 had additional diagnoses of left basilar (lower lung area) infiltration and acute toxic metabolic encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure). On 04/03/24 at 02:40 PM observation revealed R32 in his room in bed and covered with blankets. R32 yelled out for assistance and tried to get out of bed. Staff responded and took R32 to the commons area and assisted him to a recliner between the nurses' station and dining room. On 04/03/24 at 01:12 PM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R along with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M assisted R32 from his wheelchair to his bed without bearing weight on the resident's left leg. R32's brief was changed due to urine incontinence. CMA R stated R32 was ambulatory and confused when he was admitted to the facility, and he had Parkinson's disease. CMA R said to prevent falls, staff assisted R32 with activities. CMA R said R32 was generally cooperative. CMA R said R32 would occasionally inform staff if he needed to have a bowel movement or be toileted, but otherwise, R32 was on a two-hour toileting schedule; he used a fall mat, had his bed in the lowest position, and should be checked frequently. On 04/04/24 at 09:30 AM, CNA N stated staff made sure R32 had his call light in reach, used a gait belt for transfers, and checked him frequently. CNA N said staff put R32's bed in the lowest position with a fall mat next to the bed, changed from wheelchair sitting to using a recliner, and staff toileted him before and after meals and during rounds. CNA N reported staff used verbal communication that to inform staff when residents fell, and staff checked the care plan in the nurses' station for any fall interventions. On 04/04/24 at 09:32 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G reported staff were informed during the shift report about falls and looked at the working care plan for interventions. On 04/04/24 at 11:29 AM Administrative Nurse D verified the resident had repeated falls, which resulted in fractures, and confirmed the resident's care plan was not updated with interventions by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to prevent further falls. The facility's Resident Centered Care Plan Process dated 03/28/18, documented that care, treatment, and services are planned and provided to each resident in an interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and collaborative manner to ensure that all interventions are appropriate to the needs of the resident. Care planning will be implemented through the integration of assessment of findings, consideration of prescribed treatment plan, and development of goals of the resident that are reasonable and measurable. This will be considered a working care plan and will be kept on paper at the nurse's desk to document daily changes or updates to the plan of care. It is the responsibility of every member of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to read, understand, and follow the comprehensive, person-centered care plan and to report any changes, no matter how slight or significant to the IDT for immediate care plan revision. The facility failed to revise the care plan with interventions to prevent falls for R32. This placed R32 at risk for further falls related to uncommunicated care needs.
Jun 2022 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

The facility census totaled 41 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to includ...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility census totaled 41 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to include Resident (R) 19's wandering and risk of elopement. Findings included: - R19's 06/01/22 Physician Orders revealed the following diagnoses: other abnormalities of gait (manner or style of walking) and mobility, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), need for assistance with personal care, and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The 01/25/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident wandered from one to three days of the seven-day observation period. The resident required extensive assistance with most daily care, and was independent with ambulation. The resident received antianxiety and antidepressant medications daily in the seven-day observation period. The 01/25/22 Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) revealed the resident had a few fluctuating behavioral symptoms. Wandering was her biggest behavior and was usually limited to going from chair to chair in the commons area. R19 required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL) and had a slight decline in continence. The 01/25/22 Behavioral Symptoms CAA triggered due to the resident wandering, but noted her wandering consisted of short distances in the common area. The CAA noted the behavioral symptoms (wandering) would be care planned. The 10/14/21 Elopement Risk Assessment revealed the resident was at risk and had a history of attempted elopement. The 02/13/19 Care Plan revealed the resident had impaired cognition related to dementia. Staff were to escort her to the areas she likes in the facility, as she got lost easily. R19 tended to gravitate to quiet areas, where small groups of people were. She liked to sit in the glider by the front door, in the therapy room, on the couch in the television area, her room, and in the administrator's office. The 02/13/19 Care Plan did not include the residents wandering or risk for elopement. Observation on 06/13/22 at 02:30 PM revealed the resident was in an office with no other person present. The resident was touching flowers that were in the room and there were no staff present in the office with her. No staff were present in the area to see her enter or exit the office. Observation on 06/13/22 at 03:00 PM revealed the resident ambulated in the hall, with no destination, and had a steady gait. The resident did not answer questions when spoken to. Observation on 06/13/22 at 03:30 PM revealed the resident was walking behind two visitors going toward the door to exit. The resident stood by the door as they exited but made no attempt to exit. Observation on 06/14/22 at 05:05 PM revealed the resident walked in the front lobby. She entered into the unattended nurse's station area and wandered around alone. The resident touched and handled numerous things on the counters of the nurse's station (enclosed room open on both ends), including a box of covid tests. The resident picked up the public bathroom keys and left the room. She walked with the keys for approximately one minute before a housekeeper saw the keys and took them from her. After that, the resident continued to wander around the building. During an interview on 08/14/22 at 09:30 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) D reported it was the job of all the staff to keep an eye on the resident and where she goes. The resident got anxious with a lot of people or if in confined spaces. She walked the perimeter of the living room but sat off to the side or back, away from people. CNA D noted R19 wandered a lot, but CNA D had never seen her try to leave or go out the door. During an interview on 08/15/22 at 03:00 PM, CNA E reported the CNA's decided who would watch R19 each day but stated they all kept an eye on R19. She wandered around but she did not try to go out the door, so staff let her go and just supervise where she was. On 06/13/22 at 03:35 PM when the surveyor asked Licensed Nurse (LN) B the name of the resident wandering around, LN B stated oh that is just little [R19]. She just wanders around during the day. On 06/15/21 at 08:00 AM LN B produced a form called 'Elopement Risk that showed the resident was at risk for elopement. On 06/15/21 at 03:20 PM Administrative Staff A reported she would get the resident elopement risk added to the care plan. The undated facility policy for Care Plan Revision revealed changes in an elder's condition often required changes to be made in the plan of care either by change in individual approaches or by the addition of new problems to the plan of care. The facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to include Resident (R)19's wandering and risk of elopement.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a wandering Res...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a wandering Resident (R) 19, identified as at risk of elopement, which placed her at risk for wandering into unsafe areas/situation. Findings included: - R19's 06/01/22 Physician Orders revealed the following diagnoses: other abnormalities of gait (manner or style of walking) and mobility, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), need for assistance with personal care, and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The 01/25/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident wandered from one to three days of the seven-day observation period. The resident required extensive assistance with most daily care and was independent with ambulation. The resident received antianxiety and antidepressant medications daily in the seven-day observation period. The 01/25/22 Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) revealed the resident had a few fluctuating behavioral symptoms. Wandering was her biggest behavior and was usually limited to going from chair to chair in the commons area. R19 required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL) and had a slight decline in continence. The 01/25/22 Behavioral Symptoms CAA triggered due to the resident wandering, but noted her wandering consisted of short distances in the common area. The CAA noted the behavioral symptoms (wandering) would be care planned. The 10/14/21 Elopement Risk Assessment revealed the resident was at risk and had a history of attempted elopement. The 02/13/19 Care Plan revealed the resident had impaired cognition related to dementia. The staff was to escort her to the areas she likes in the facility, as she got lost easily. R19 tended to gravitate to quiet areas, where small groups of people were. She liked to sit in the glider by the front door, in the therapy room, on the couch in the television area, her room, and in the administrator's office. The 02/13/19 Care Plan did not include the residents wandering or risk for elopement. Observation on 06/13/22 at 02:30 PM revealed the resident was in an office with no other person present. The resident was touching flowers that were in the room and there were no staff present in the office with her. No staff were present in the area to see her enter or exit the office. Observation on 06/13/22 at 03:00 PM revealed the resident ambulated in the hall, with no destination, and had a steady gait. The resident did not answer questions when spoken to. Observation on 06/13/22 at 03:30 PM revealed the resident walking behind two visitors going toward the door to exit. The resident stood by the door as they exited but made no attempt to exit. Observation on 06/14/22 at 05:05 PM revealed the resident walked in the front lobby. She entered into the unattended nurse's station area and wandered around alone. The resident touched and handled numerous things on the counters of the nurse's station (enclosed room open on both ends), including a box of covid tests. The resident picked up the public bathroom keys and left the room. She walked with the keys for approximately one minute before a housekeeper saw the keys and took them from her. After that, the resident continued to wander around the building. During an interview on 08/14/22 at 09:30 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) D reported it was the job of all the staff to keep an eye on the resident and where she goes. The resident got anxious with a lot of people or if in confined spaces. She walked the perimeter of the living room but sat off to the side or back, away from people. CNA D noted R19 wandered a lot, but CNA D had never seen her try to leave or go out the door. During an interview on 08/15/22 at 03:00 PM, CNA E reported the CNAs decided who would watch R19 each day but stated they all kept an eye on R19. She wandered around but she did not try to go out the door, so staff let her go and just supervise where she was. On 06/13/22 at 03:35 PM when the surveyor asked Licensed Nurse (LN) B the name of the resident wandering around, LN B stated the residents name and said she just wandered around during the day. On 06/15/21 at 08:00 AM LN B produced an Elopement Risk form which showed R19 was at risk for elopement. On 06/15/21 at 03:20 PM Administrative Staff A reported she would get the resident elopement risk added to the care plan. The facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision for R19, a wandering resident identified as at risk of elopement, which placed the resident at risk of wandering into unsafe areas/situations.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

The facility census totaled 41 residents with 12 sampled including five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the consu...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility census totaled 41 residents with 12 sampled including five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist identified the lack of monitoring for potential side effects in the use of antipsychotic medications received, when facility staff did not complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment for Resident (R) 26. Findings Included: - The 06/14/22 Physician's Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R26 with diagnosss of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness). The 02/02/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment failed to identify the use of an antipsychotic medication daily for R26. The 05/02/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The assessment failed to identify the use of an antipsychotic medication daily for R26. The 01/13/22 Physicians Orders documented an order for Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) 25 milligrams (mg) half a tablet twice a day. The monthly Pharmacy Medication Record Review (MRR) for January 2022 through May 2022 lacked documentation regarding the lack of an AIMS assessment for R26, who received Seroquel twice daily during this time frame. The Resident Assessments in the EHR from 01/01/22 to 06/15/22 lacked documentation of an AIMS assessment completed for R26 concerning the use of an antipsychotic medication. On 06/15/22 at 08:30 AM, R26 sat at a table in the dining room, visiting with three other residents, and exhibited no abnormal involuntary movements during the observation. On 06/16/22 at 08:40 AM Administrative Staff B stated the facility completed AIMS assessments at least quarterly and confirmed the facility did not complete this for R26. On 06/16/22 at 01:55 PM Consultant Staff H confirmed he looked at items like the AIMS assessment periodically and stated he needed to follow those more often. The 11/2020 Drug Regimen Review policy documented a contracted or employed licensed pharmacist would review all medications for appropriate monitoring by facility staff for efficacy and adverse side effects. The facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist identified the lack of monitoring for potential side effects in the use of antipsychotic medications received, when facility staff did not complete an AIMS assessment for R26.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

The facility census totaled 41 residents with 12 sampled including five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate ...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility census totaled 41 residents with 12 sampled including five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of potential side effects for antipsychotic medications received, when facility staff did not obtain an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment for Resident (R) 26. Findings Included: - R26's 06/14/22 Physician's Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness). The 02/02/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment failed to identify the use of an antipsychotic medication daily for R26. The 05/02/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The assessment failed to identify the use of an antipsychotic medication daily for R26. The 01/13/22 Physicians Orders documented an order for Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) 25 milligrams (mg) half a tablet twice a day. The Medication Administration Record for 01/13/22 through 06/15/22 documented R26 received Seroquel twice daily. The Resident Assessments in the EHR from 01/01/22 to 06/15/22 lacked documentation of an AIMS assessment completed for R26 concerning the use of an antipsychotic medication. On 06/15/22 at 08:30 AM, R26 sat at a table in the dining room, visiting with three other residents, and exhibited no abnormal involuntary movements during the observation. On 06/16/22 at 08:40 AM Administrative Staff B stated the facility completed AIMS assessments at least quarterly and confirmed the facility did not complete this for R26. On 06/16/22 at 01:55 PM Consultant Staff H confirmed he looked at items like the AIMS assessment, periodically and stated he needed to follow those more often. The 11/2017 Psychoactive Medication Policy documented that nursing staff would perform an AIMS assessment on any resident on an antipsychotic medication on a quarterly basis and changes would be reported to the physician. The facility failed to monitor for potential side effects in the use of antipsychotic medications received when facility staff did not complete an AIMS assessment for R26.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

The facility reported a census of 41 residents, with all receiving meals from one main kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store and serve food in in a s...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 41 residents, with all receiving meals from one main kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store and serve food in in a sanitary manner when observation revealed undated foods in the kitchen refrigerator and when dietary staff used gloves but cross-contaminated the gloves during food service. Findings included: - On 06/13/22 at 07:58 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen accompanied by Dietary Staff (DS) F revealed a wall of half-size refrigerators with the following food found with no open or use by date: a half-cut onion wrapped in plastic wrap, a bowl of corn relish, a container of baked beans, a bag of cherries undated, a tomato partly cut up, a tub of French Onion dip with no date, a bowl of cut green peppers with no date, a bowl of sour cream not dated, and a large tub of sliced cheese. DS F removed and disposed of the undated food items from the refrigerators. On a follow-up tour of the kitchen on 06/14/22 at 12:20 PM, DS F prepared food for the noon meal. DS F lined a large pan with a paper lining using her bare hands. She then donned gloves and handled a pan of rolls. She lifted the pan and placed them on the counter by the lined pan and proceeded to tear the rolls apart, placing them in the lined pan, after handling the underneath side of the roll pan and counter, with the same gloves. DS F then served the food with the same gloves touching the plates, utensils, pans on the stove, and continued to handle the rolls with the same gloved hands, which were cross-contaminated from other surfaces touched. On 06/14/22 at 12:25 PM after asking DS F about the continued cross-contaminated gloves used in the observation, DS F then removed the gloves and continued serving the meals and using tongs to serve rolls and used good hand hygiene after she removed the gloves. DS F reported she did not realize she could not touch other things if she had gloves on. She thought she was safe to touch with gloves. On 06/14/22 at 12:40 PM Certified Dietary Manager G stated she expected DS F to know how to serve and contributed it to being nervous with a surveyor watching her but stated she should use the correct way, no matter who was in the kitchen. The 07/2014 Food Receiving and Storage policy revealed all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer would be covered, labeled and dated (use by date). The 2016 Proper Handwashing and Proper Glove Usage policy revealed staff would be reminded that gloves become contaminated just as hands do and were to be changed often. When in doubt, staff were to remove gloves and wash hands. Gloves were to be used whenever direct food contact was required. The facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a sanitary manner by having undated, unmarked food in the refrigerator, and the failure to change gloves when contaminated before touching other food items.
Nov 2020 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

The facility reported a census of 38 residents (R). The sample included 12 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the completion of comprehensive assessments for...

Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 38 residents (R). The sample included 12 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the completion of comprehensive assessments for seven residents when facility staff did not develop the Care Area Assessments (CAA) triggered in section V of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) for R6, R17, R19, R26, R27, R28, and R33. Finding include: - Review of R6's Annual MDS dated 11/04/20 revealed he received scheduled and as needed (PRN) pain medication for frequent pain, rated a seven out of 10. The MDS noted the resident received insulin, antidepressant, anticoagulant, antibiotic, diuretic, and opioid pain medications daily in the seven day review period. The associated 11/04/20 Care Area Assessment (CAA) lacked development for pain and psychotropic medications, as triggered in section V of the MDS for R6. Review of R17's Annual MDS dated 03/20/20 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive two staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADL). The resident received scheduled and PRN pain medication for almost constant pain, rated as moderate. The resident received antidepressant medications in the seven day look back period but did not receive opioid pain medications. (Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 03/01/20- 03/31/20 revealed the resident did receive Tylenol with codeine, an opiate medication used to treat pain, at least twice daily, and PRN.) The associated CAA dated 03/09/20 revealed the section V triggered areas from the MDS were not developed regarding Cognitive Loss/Dementia and Pain. Review of R19's Annual MDS dated 03/21/20 revealed a BIMS score of three, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers, received daily antidepressant medications in the seven day look back period, and received scheduled pain medications in the five day review period. The associated CAA triggered from section V of the MDS, which included Cognitive Loss/Dementia, Visual Function, Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter, Behavioral Symptoms , Falls, Nutritional Status, Dehydration/Fluid Maintenance, Pressure Ulcers, and Psychotropic Drug Use, were not developed. Review of R26's Annual MDS dated 04/10/20 revealed the resident had minimal depression indicated by a total mood severity score of 01. The resident received insulin, antidepressant, anticoagulant, and diuretic medications daily in the seven day look back period. The associated CAA dated 04/10/20 triggered for Psychotropic Drug Use, with no summary completed. Review of R27's Annual MDS dated 10/13/20 revealed the resident complained of difficulty or pain when swallowing and received a mechanically altered diet. The resident received insulin, an antidepressant, antianxiety, diuretic and opioid medications daily in the seven day review period. The associated CAAs triggered by section V of the MDS revealed Mood State, Nutritional Status, Dehydration/Fluid Maintenance, and Psychotropic Drug Use all triggered for R27, but were not developed. Review of R28's Annual MDS dated 04/12/20 revealed a BIMS score of five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance with toilet use, was frequently incontinence, and received daily diuretic medication in the seven day look back period. The associated CAA dated 04/12/20 revealed the triggered areas from section V of the MDS which included Cognitive Loss/Dementia, ADL Functional/Rehabilitation Potential, Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter, Falls, Nutritional Status, Pressure Ulcer, and Psychotropic Drug Use, were not developed. Review of R33's 10/15/20 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the resident required extensive assistance of one staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), received scheduled and as needed (PRN) pain medication for frequent pain reported as a six out of 10. The resident received antidepressant, anticoagulant, diuretic, and opioid medications daily and required oxygen (O2) therapy. The associated CAAs were not completed for the resident. Interview with Administrative Nurse B on 11/19/20 at 10:30 AM revealed for the past year she completed the MDS assessments at the facility. Administrative Staff B stated she did not know the CAA were something to be completed, but she would start working on those. Interview with Administrative Nurse A on 11/19/20 at 11:30 AM revealed the MDS coordinator did receive training and stated there were staff available to answer her questions, and other resource people as well. Administrative Nurse A stated she used to be the MDS coordinator and she was onsite every day to help if the current MDS coordinator had questions. The facility utilized the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) for completion of the CAAs. The facility failed to ensure the CAAs were developed for seven residents reviewed.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Kansas.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kansas facilities.
Concerns
  • • 10 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Hilltop Manor Nursing Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Hilltop Manor Nursing Center Staffed?

CMS rates HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Kansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 56%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Hilltop Manor Nursing Center?

State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER during 2020 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 9 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Hilltop Manor Nursing Center?

HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 45 certified beds and approximately 44 residents (about 98% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CUNNINGHAM, Kansas.

How Does Hilltop Manor Nursing Center Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hilltop Manor Nursing Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Hilltop Manor Nursing Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Hilltop Manor Nursing Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Kansas average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 56%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Hilltop Manor Nursing Center Ever Fined?

HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Hilltop Manor Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?

HILLTOP MANOR NURSING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.