HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Hutchinson Operator, LLC has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided at this facility. With a state rank of #252 out of 295 Kansas nursing homes, they are in the bottom half, and they rank last among the seven facilities in Reno County. The situation is worsening, with the number of critical issues increasing from four in 2023 to nine in 2024. While staffing is rated 4 out of 5 stars, showing a strength in this area, the facility has a concerning $577,529 in fines, the highest in Kansas, suggesting serious compliance problems. Specific incidents highlight alarming failures, including a resident who was not given CPR despite being coded for it and another who choked and did not receive timely interventions, leading to tragic outcomes. Overall, while there are some strengths in staffing, the critical issues and fines raise serious red flags for families considering this nursing home for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Kansas
- #252/295
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $577,529 in fines. Lower than most Kansas facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 47 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kansas. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 31 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Kansas average (2.9)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Kansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
7 points above Kansas average of 48%
The Ugly 31 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 42 residents with three residents reviewed for code status. Based on interviews and record r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU-localize...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0742
(Tag F0742)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for mood and behavior. Based on ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospice (a type of health care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with four reviewed for falls. Based on observation, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard Resident (R)1, R32, and R144s' insulin (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for immunizations. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified di...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner and failed to adequately sanitize dishes f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
3 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 39 residents with five selected for review. Based on interview and record review, the facili...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0808
(Tag F0808)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 39 residents with five residents selected for review for dietary services. Based on interview ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 39 residents with five residents reviewed including three reviewed for respiratory services. B...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 43 residents, with seven residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3, at high risk for falls, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
13 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility census totaled 42 residents, with 12 sampled, including one for indwelling urinary catheters (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). Based on ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 42 residents with 12 in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 42 residents with 12 sampled including one for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 42 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 42 residents with 12 sampled including one for an indwelling urinary catheter. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain a phys...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility census totaled 42 residents, with 12 sampled, including five for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate follow ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
- R32's Physician's Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 08/09/22 documented diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, distu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. The facility had one main kitchen serving one dining room. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a certified ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. The facility had one main kitchen where food was stored and prepared serving one dining room. Based on observation, interview, and record review the fac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer the facility effectively by the failure to have resident care suppl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
- An observation on 08/08/22 at 10:14 AM revealed Hospitality Aid O picked up meal trays and went from one resident room on to the next. Hospitality Aid O picked up multiple meal trays and did not per...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2021
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility census totaled 41 residents, with two reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 41 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address the consultant pharma...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 41 residents, with 12 sampled, including five for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately docum...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the residents with a safe, functional, and comfortable environment by ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 41 residents. The facility had one main kitchen where food was stored and prepared for one dining room. Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 life-threatening violation(s), $577,529 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 31 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $577,529 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Kansas. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Hutchinson Operator, Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Hutchinson Operator, Llc Staffed?
CMS rates HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 55%, which is 9 percentage points above the Kansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Hutchinson Operator, Llc?
State health inspectors documented 31 deficiencies at HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC during 2021 to 2024. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 27 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Hutchinson Operator, Llc?
HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 45 certified beds and approximately 41 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HUTCHINSON, Kansas.
How Does Hutchinson Operator, Llc Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (55%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hutchinson Operator, Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Hutchinson Operator, Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Hutchinson Operator, Llc Stick Around?
Staff turnover at HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC is high. At 55%, the facility is 9 percentage points above the Kansas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Hutchinson Operator, Llc Ever Fined?
HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC has been fined $577,529 across 3 penalty actions. This is 14.9x the Kansas average of $38,854. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Hutchinson Operator, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
HUTCHINSON OPERATOR, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.