MEDICALODGES KINSLEY
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Medicalodges Kinsley has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its operations and care quality. It ranks #142 out of 295 facilities in Kansas, placing it in the top half but still reflecting poor performance overall. The trend is improving, as issues decreased from 7 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, which is a positive sign. Staffing is a relative strength, with a 4/5 rating, though the turnover rate is average at 56%. However, the facility has faced concerning fines totaling $53,580, which is higher than 90% of Kansas facilities, highlighting issues with compliance. On the downside, there have been critical incidents, including one resident experiencing severe pain without proper management, leading to complications until her death. Additionally, the facility failed to consistently provide the required RN coverage, affecting care quality for residents. While there are some strengths in staffing, the serious deficiencies and high fines suggest families should be cautious when considering this facility for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Kansas
- #142/295
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $53,580 in fines. Lower than most Kansas facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Kansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Kansas average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Kansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
8 points above Kansas average of 48%
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 24 residents, with four residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 24 residents, with four residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
7 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 22 residents with 10 residents sampled and one resident reviewed for pain management and two a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 22 residents. The sample included 10 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue accurate and complete Beneficiary Protection Notifi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 22 residents with 10 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify a significant change and complete an assess...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 22 residents with 10 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a weekly skin assessment for one resident. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 22 residents with 10 included in the sample and five residents reviewed for unnecessary medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent possible food-...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 22 resident. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Pa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 20 residents with 12 included in the sample. that included one resident reviewed for respirato...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 20 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 hours a day, seven days a week, as re...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2021
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0943
(Tag F0943)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility census totaled 21 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all facility staff were trained in Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE) annually.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 21 residents. The facility had one main kitchen where food was stored and prepared for one dining room. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $53,580 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $53,580 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Kansas. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (38/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Medicalodges Kinsley's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MEDICALODGES KINSLEY an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Medicalodges Kinsley Staffed?
CMS rates MEDICALODGES KINSLEY's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the Kansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Medicalodges Kinsley?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at MEDICALODGES KINSLEY during 2021 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 12 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Medicalodges Kinsley?
MEDICALODGES KINSLEY is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MEDICALODGES, INC., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 42 certified beds and approximately 23 residents (about 55% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in KINSLEY, Kansas.
How Does Medicalodges Kinsley Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, MEDICALODGES KINSLEY's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (56%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Medicalodges Kinsley?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Medicalodges Kinsley Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MEDICALODGES KINSLEY has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Medicalodges Kinsley Stick Around?
Staff turnover at MEDICALODGES KINSLEY is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the Kansas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Medicalodges Kinsley Ever Fined?
MEDICALODGES KINSLEY has been fined $53,580 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Kansas average of $33,615. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Medicalodges Kinsley on Any Federal Watch List?
MEDICALODGES KINSLEY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.