LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Locust Grove Village in La Crosse, Kansas, has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. Ranking #203 out of 295 facilities in Kansas places it in the bottom half, and while it is the only option in Rush County, families may want to consider this when making decisions. The facility has shown some improvement over time, with issues decreasing from six in 2024 to just one in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength here, with a 4/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 42%, which is better than the Kansas average, indicating that staff members tend to stay longer and build relationships with residents. However, a serious incident of physical abuse was reported, where a resident was allegedly struck by a staff member, alongside other concerns like inadequate dietary management and expired medications, suggesting that while there are some positive aspects, families should weigh these serious issues carefully.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Kansas
- #203/295
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near Kansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Kansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below Kansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Kansas average (2.9)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Kansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
The facility identified a census of 34 residents, with three residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to prevent...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with one reviewed for side rails. Based on observat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Bas...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Bas...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 36 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store biologicals as required when staff failed to discard or destroy expired medic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a full time Certified Dietary Manager (CDM...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for falls. Based on observation, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Bas...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Bas...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to discard expired medications in the emergency drug...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kansas facilities.
- • 42% turnover. Below Kansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 11 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Locust Grove Village's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Locust Grove Village Staffed?
CMS rates LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Kansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Locust Grove Village?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Locust Grove Village?
LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 38 certified beds and approximately 32 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LA CROSSE, Kansas.
How Does Locust Grove Village Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Locust Grove Village?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Locust Grove Village Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Locust Grove Village Stick Around?
LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Kansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Locust Grove Village Ever Fined?
LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Locust Grove Village on Any Federal Watch List?
LOCUST GROVE VILLAGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.