SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The sample included 16 residents, which included four residents sampled for acci...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The sample included 16 residents, which included four residents sampled for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate to identify causal factors of falls and/or initiate/implement immediate, appropriate interventions to prevent further falls for three sampled dependent residents, including Resident (R)15, related to a lack of wheelchair pedals for support while staff propelled the resident; R27, who experienced a fall with an inappropriate intervention; and for the multiple falls experienced by cognitively impaired R2, with the most recent fall resulting in major injury with two fractured (broken bone) vertebrae (bones of the spine).
Findings included:
- Review of R2's Physician Orders, dated 12/13/23, included diagnoses of fractured thoracic (middle section of the spine) vertebra, repeated falls, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, unsteadiness of feet, urinary incontinence, peripheral neuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), hypertension (high blood pressure), overactive bladder, and gait (manner or style of walking) and balance abnormalities.
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance of staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. She had no functional limitations in range of motion of the upper or lower extremities. She was always incontinent of bowel, occasionally incontinent of urine, and did not have a toileting program. She experienced two or more non-injury falls and one fall with major injury. The resident received Occupational Therapy (OT) for four days and Physical Therapy (PT) for four days of the look back period.
The Discharge Return Anticipated MDS dated [DATE], documented the resident transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE].
The Entry MDS dated [DATE], documented the resident returned to the facility on [DATE].
The Cognitive Loss/ Dementia, Communication, and Falls Care Area Assessments (CAA), dated 09/15/23, documented the resident lacked orientation with memory and recall deficits related to dementia, change in mental status, and short term/long term memory loss. She had a history of falls prior to admission, weakness, and physical performance limitations that affected balance, gait, strength, and muscle endurance.
The Care Plan dated 12/22/23, included the following interventions:
On 05/21/19, staff were to remind the resident to lock the brakes on the wheelchair before transfers.
On 08/13/19, R2 experienced episodes of incontinence due to an overactive bladder if not toileted timely . (The care plan lacked any instruction staff on when to toilet the resident.)
On 11/07/22, therapy was to screen, and staff would initiate a bladder diary to determine a toileting schedule.
On 01/26/23, staff were to know the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and exhibited some restlessness and anxiety prior to a fall. R2 wandered into the wrong room and attempted to transfer to a bed unassisted. Nursing staff were to monitor the resident for behaviors every shift. If R2 was restless or anxious, staff were to report to the nurse to assess and treat. Staff would repeat urinalysis (UA). In addition, staff were to adjust the resident's bed height to a lower position for improved transfers.
On 01/28/23, therapy assessed the resident's wheelchair, R2's positioning in the wheelchair, and therapy adjusted the wheelchair. Staff were to remind her to call for assistance for bathroom use.
On 08/16/23, the facility asked R2's family to take Crocs (rubberized slip-on shoes) home. Staff were to encourage the resident to wear her tennis shoes. Staff would know the resident liked to wear her Crocs and remind her that they were not the safest footwear. Staff should remind the resident she cannot get up on her own and would know she may forget and may need reminders.
On 09/19/23, nursing staff were to encourage the resident to utilize the grab bar in the shower room and ensure the wheelchair brakes locked before transferring the resident to the shower chair.
On 09/20/23, R2 moved around the facility by self-propelling her wheelchair and would take assistance from staff if offered. The resident used bed rails to reposition and to get in and out of bed. The resident no longer used her walker for locomotion, but occasionally used the walker for transfers. The resident required two staff for transfers using a transfer belt and/or a mechanical lift as needed. Staff were to know the resident was forgetful and did not remember she needed assistance transferring. Staff were to keep pathways clear and decrease clutter to minimize the risk of falls. Staff were to keep the resident's wheelchair beside the bed. Staff were to ensure the resident wore secure footwear when out of bed. She sometimes lost her gripper socks and/or placed unsafe slippers over the gripper socks. Staff were to assist the resident in putting gripper socks back on.
On 10/09/23, staff were to obtain a UA for the resident.
On 11/14/23, staff were to lay R2 down after meals to prevent confusion and ensure safety.
Review of the Progress Notes and Fall Investigation Reports revealed the following concerns related to falls experienced by R2:
On 07/03/23 at 06:45 AM, the resident adjusted herself in the wheelchair and started to fall forward. Staff were able to catch the resident and assist her to the floor on her buttocks. The fall investigation report failed to identify causal factors to determine an immediate and appropriate intervention to prevent further falls.
On 08/13/23 at 07:33 AM, two unidentified residents reported R2 got up from her wheelchair and fell. The intervention was to have family take R2's Crocs home and utilize sneakers.
On 08/15/23 at 01:30 PM, an unidentified CNA reported R2 had an unwitnessed fall from the toilet, resulting in a goose egg sized, raised area to the back of the resident's head. The documentation noted the casual factor of the fall as the resident was impulsive and sometimes confused and should not be left on the toilet by herself. She had uneven balance and did not have her walker at the time of the fall. The facility educated the unidentified CNA regarding the importance of staying with a dependent, cognitively impaired resident while the resident was on the toilet and to provide supervision, to prevent falls.
On 09/16/23 at 08:10 PM, R2 reported she attempted to transfer from the sofa to the wheelchair and fell to the floor. The fall was not witnessed, and the resident was noted to have severe cognitive impairment. The investigation lacked a causal factor and immediate appropriate intervention to prevent further falls. The facility placed an intervention to provide the unidentified CNA education.
On 09/19/23 at 09:05 PM, an unidentified CNA reported they found R2 on the floor wearing a gown and socks. The resident reported she started to sit down, missed the chair, and landed on the floor.
On 10/08/23 at 11:15 PM, staff found the resident sitting on the floor in front of the bathroom. The investigation report failed to provide an immediate intervention to prevent further falls.
On 11/16/23 at 03:00 PM, the resident attempted to toilet herself and fell to the floor landing on her backside. She hit her head, causing a goose egg, which measured approximately two centimeters around, to the back of her head. The facility placed an intervention to prevent further falls, which included instructions to staff to remind the resident to use her call light for assistance for transfers and to ensure the resident used non-slip footwear. Review of the resident's care plan revealed both interventions were already implemented following previous falls. The Investigation Report, lacked a new immediate intervention to prevent further falls.
The Progress Note dated 11/27/23 at 01:30 PM, revealed R2 was in her wheelchair when an unidentified Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) served the resident's meal at 01:00 PM and left the room. Approximately five minutes later, an unidentified CNA heard a crash and found the resident on the floor with the bedside table on top of her. The nurse assessed the resident and called 911 for transport to the emergency room (ER).
The Progress notes dated 11/27/23 at 05:30 PM, documented the nurse received a call from the ER with a resident status update. She had fractures of thoracic spine.
The Hospital Discharge Summary dated 11/30/23, documentation included the resident sustained a fracture of the 10th and 11th vertebra of the thoracic (bones of the spine (mid back) following a fall on 11/27/23 at the nursing facility.
Review of the R2's Electronic Medical Record, (EMR) from 07/01/23 through 01/10/24, revealed the resident had a history of falls and experienced eight falls in the five months prior to the fall on 11/27/23 at 01:05 PM, which resulted in two fractured thoracic vertebrae.
Observation on 01/10/24 at 11:03 AM, revealed the resident sat in the wheelchair in the commons area. She wore multicolored Crocs, with her feet on the pedals of the wheelchair. A brace was visible beneath her shirt, that covered her chest wall.
On 01/11/24 at 09:30 AM, observed Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) P, CNA MM, and CNA NN transferred and provided toileting to R2. The staff transferred the resident to the toilet with a gait belt. R2 wore Crocs on her feet. The staff reported she wore her crocs all the time.
On 01/11/24 at 09:30 AM, CNA P reported the resident was at risk for falls and had several falls. The resident used to walk, and the staff could walk her back and forth to the bathroom but stated R2 had not walked in almost a year. CNA P said when a resident fell, the nurse should put an immediate intervention in place to prevent further falls. CNA P said the new interventions should be added to the care plan, and staff have access to the care plan for directions on caring for the resident.
On 01/17/24 at 10:13 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I stated when a resident fell, the charge nurse should do an assessment, which included vital signs, range of motion, and a head-to-toe skin assessment. If the fall was not witnessed or the resident hit their head, staff should complete a neurological assessment. The nurse should notify the physician, the resident representative, and the Director of Nursing. The charge nurse should initiate an investigation at the time of the fall to determine the cause. An immediate new and appropriate intervention should be put in place and communicated to the staff. LN I stated a resident with dementia was not a reliable reporter for the cause of the fall and it would not be appropriate for a resident with dementia to use an intervention to remind the resident to use a call light. A resident that required assistance with transfers to the toilet and was cognitively impaired should not be left unattended in the bathroom. Staff should use the resident's care plan for guidance for fall interventions. New staff were not familiar with long term care and the system to put new appropriate interventions on the resident's care plan immediately to prevent further falls.
On 01/17/24 at 01:15 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated on 11/27/23, R2 had an unwitnessed fall. The investigation revealed the probable cause was due to the resident reached for the wheeled end table and she fell. Administrative Nurse D stated the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and a history of multiple falls due to her poor impulse control where she would try to stand, transfer, and toilet herself without staff assistance. Staff had R2 transported to the hospital for an evaluation and R2 was admitted due to fractured vertebras. She was sent back to the facility with a brace to stabilize her fractured vertebrae. Staff removed the wheeled table from the resident's room and replaced it with a stationary table. The charge nurse should initiate a new immediate and appropriate fall intervention to prevent further falls. The resident's BIMS score should be 13 or higher for resident education to be an appropriate intervention. R2's interventions were not appropriate, and no new interventions were put in place to prevent further falls prior to the resident falling on 11/27/23, which resulted in fractures.
The 02/2017 facility's policy for Clinical Care Systems Guidelines for Falls did not address initiating a new, immediate, and appropriate intervention based on causal factors of each fall experienced by a resident, in order to prevent further falls.
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate to identify causal factors of the fall and/or initiate/implement, new immediate, appropriate interventions to prevent further falls for cognitively impaired R2, who had multiple falls, one of which resulted in two fractured vertebrae.
- The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 01/02/24, for Resident (R)27, documented a diagnosis of weakness.
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and extensive assistance of one staff for locomotion on the unit with the use of a wheelchair. He had no limitations in his range of motion (ROM) and no falls since the prior assessment.
The Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/02/23, documented the resident had a history of falls due to weakness and had impaired gait and mobility which required him to have staff assistance with transfers.
The Quarterly MDS, dated 11/01/23, documented the resident had a BIMS score of five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and extensive assistance of one staff for locomotion on the unit with the use of a wheelchair and had no limitation in his ROM. He had one fall with injury (except major) since his prior assessment.
The falls care plan, revised 01/08/24, instructed staff that the resident would forget he was unable to stand on his own, creating possible safety risks. Staff were to help remind him of safety issues. He had anti-tip brakes applied to his wheelchair to prevent the wheelchair from rolling backwards if he did attempt to stand up on his own. Staff were to keep the resident in the front commons area between meals. The resident received physical therapy (PT) following a prior fall.
Review of the resident's EMR revealed Fall Assessments which placed the resident at a high risk for falls, dated: 06/11/23, 09/11/23 and 10/30/23.
Review of a Fall Report, dated 12/23/23 and provided by the facility, revealed the resident had a witnessed fall on 12/23/23 in the front commons room when he attempted to stand up from his wheelchair, took a couple of steps and fell to the floor, landing on his right side. The resident had a decrease in his ROM on his right upper extremity and was transported to the ER for evaluation, where it was found he had a re-fracture of his right clavicle (collar bone). Staff were following all fall interventions at the time of the fall. The new intervention for the fall was to obtain a urine sample for a urinalysis (UA-lab analysis of urine) to check for a urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system).
Review of the resident's EMR lacked a lab result for the UA which had been ordered on 12/23/23.
On 01/17/24 at 01:15 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated the facility had failed to obtain a UA to send to the lab for analysis at the time of the fall. Administrative Nurse E stated that had been an inappropriate fall intervention.
The facility policy for Falls, dated February 2017, included: The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will review the post fall investigation and summarizes the team recommendations for interventions.
The facility failed to initiate an appropriate fall intervention following an injury fall for this dependent resident to prevent further falls.
- Review of Resident (R)15's Physician Order Sheet dated 12/13/23, revealed diagnoses included Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk).
.
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired decision making. The resident was rarely/never understood. The resident the resident was able to wheel herself in her wheelchair and was dependent on staff for transfers. The resident had no impairment in the upper or lower extremities.
The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/27/23, assessed the resident was unable to always make her needs known. Staff assist the resident with all cares and the resident self-propelled herself to/from the dining room.
The Falls CAA, dated 10/27/23, triggered secondary to impaired gait and mobility and level of assistance required with transfers. Contributing factors includes history of falls prior to admission, weakness and physical performance limitations affecting balance, gait, strength, and muscle endurance.
The Care Plan reviewed 11/02/23, instructed staff the resident propelled herself in her wheelchair but did need assistance with direction. The resident was at high risk for falls, had weakness and poor understanding of safety issues.
Observation, on 01/10/24 at 12:25 PM, revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)Z propelled the resident in her wheelchair which lacked foot pedals, to the dining room. The resident thighs were slouched forward from the seat bottom. her knees were bent under the wheelchair, and her feet skimmed along directly touching on the floor.
Observation, on 01/17/24 at 11:25 AM, revealed the resident seated in her wheelchair with her thighs slouched forward from the seat bottom of the wheelchair and she attempted to propel herself about in the common living area. Administrator A at that time, propelled the resident to the dining room without foot pedals on the chair and her feet skimmed along directly touching on the floor. Administrative Staff A obtained foot pedals for the resident's wheelchair, but the resident was unable to keep her feet on the pedals due to posture. Interview with Administrative Staff A revealed the resident needed a wheelchair seating evaluation as the resident usually propelled herself and took the pedals off the chair stating staff should guide the resident to the dining room while she propelled herself. Administrative Staff A stated when staff propel her, her feet should be on wheelchair pedals.
Interview, on 01/17/24 at 11:28 AM, with Consulting Staff GG, confirmed the need for a wheelchair evaluation.
Observation, on 01/17/24 at 11:32 AM, revealed CNA Q propelled the resident to the dining room in her wheelchair without foot pedals. The resident could not hold her feet up off the floor consistently and her feet skimmed the floor. Interview at that time with CNA Q revealed the resident slouched in her wheelchair, and thought the resident needed a different wheelchair. CNA Q stated the resident could propel herself, but often became confused and could not follow directions.
The facility did not provide a policy for use of wheelchair pedals.
The facility failed to ensure proper wheelchair seating seating/positioning/foot pedals to prevent accidents for this resident when staff aided with propelling to avoid injury as the resident's feet skimmed along directly touching on the floor under the wheelchair.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 46 residents which included 16 residents sampled with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 46 residents which included 16 residents sampled with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity/privacy of the one sampled resident (R)9, with a catheter/urine collection bag, with the lack of a cover for the urine collection bag to prevent full visualization of the resident's urine.
Findings included:
- Review of resident (R)9's Physician Orders, documentation included diagnoses of retention of urine, injury of kidney unspecified, and need for assistance with personal care.
The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documentation included the resident with the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating cognitively intact. Her continence was not rated due to ostomy and indwelling catheter.
The Urinary Incontinence/Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) for urinary incontinence/indwelling catheter, dated 01/03/24, documented the resident used a urinary indwelling catheter.
The care plan (CP) for indwelling catheter, dated 12/04/23, directed the staff to provide a privacy bag for the catheter and to position the catheter bag and tubing away from the entrance of the door.
On 01/10/24 at 01:12 PM, the resident sat in her recliner. Her trash can, beside her recliner, held her uncovered catheter collection bag which hung on the outside of the trash can with her urine visible in the collection bag from the doorway. The resident stated that was where the staff always placed the urine collection bag. She stated there was a catheter cover on her wheelchair (W/C) which she liked to prevent others from seeing her urine. She did not know why one was not used while in her room.
On 01/10/24 at 01:12 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) MM confirmed the above finding and stated the resident's catheter bag should be covered with a bag to ensure the resident's privacy/dignity.
On 01/17/24 at 10:13 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I, stated the resident's catheter bag should be covered to ensure the resident's privacy/dignity.
On 01/17/24 at 12:49 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the staff should cover the resident's catheter bag to prevent the urine from being seen from the doorway of her room and to ensure the resident's privacy and dignity.
The facility lacked a policy regarding providing full visual privacy for a resident's urine collection bags.
The facility failed to ensure the dignity/privacy of the resident with the lack of a catheter/urine collection bag cover, to prevent full visualization of the resident's urine to anyone passing or entering her room.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 16 selected for review which included five residents reviewed for unnecessar...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 16 selected for review which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R)15, of the five residents reviewed, received laxatives for lack of bowel movement as ordered by the physician.
Findings included:
- Review of Resident (R)15's Physician Order Sheet dated 12/13/23, revealed diagnoses included Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk).
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired decision making. The resident was rarely/never understood. The resident received antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. The resident was on antipsychotics on a routine basis.
The Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 10/27/23, triggered secondary to use of psychotropic med to manage psychiatric illness/condition. A licensed nurse monitors for side effects every shift, and the physician is to be notified of any abnormal findings. A pharmacist consultant will review medications monthly and the PCP (Primary Care Physician) will review medications with each visit. Contributing factors include current history of depression/psychosis/insomnia.
The Cognitive Loss CAA, dated 10/27/23, assessed the resident was unable to always make her needs known. Staff assist the resident with all cares.
The Care Plan reviewed 11/02/23, instructed staff to monitor for bowel movement each shift and offer the as needed (PRN) laxative for constipation and monitor for effectiveness when given.
On 03/03/22, the physician instructed staff to administer Milk of Magnesia Suspension (a laxative), 30 milliliters, every 24 hours as needed for constipation per standing order.
Review of the electronic medical record task for bowel movement documentation, revealed the resident did not have a bowel pattern of lack of bowel movement for four to five days, and the record documented the resident had a lack of bowel movement from 01/10/24 through 01/17/24, for seven days.
Observation, on 01/11/24 at 09:35 AM, revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Q and Z transferred the resident from her wheelchair to bed. The resident smiled and laughed but did not answer questions. CNA Q stated the resident did not speak but did laugh to communicate to staff.
Interview, on 01/17/24 at 03:00 PM, with Administrative Nurse E, confirmed the lack of bowel movement from 01/10/24 through 01/17/24, but wound question the Certified Staff to confirm this.
Interview on 01/17/24 at 3:20 PM, with Administrative Nurse E, revealed she did a bowel assessment on the resident and found active bowel sounds, and would administer the Milk of Magnesia. Administrative Nurse E stated the resident usually had a bowel movement on shower days, but staff could not confirm the resident had a bowel movement for the past nine days.
Interview, on 01/17/24 at 03:30 PM, with Consulting Staff GG, stated the facility followed the physician orders and standing orders for administering laxatives.
The facility lacked a policy for administering laxatives.
The facility failed to monitor this resident's bowel movements for constipation patterns and administer laxatives as ordered by the physician to ensure optimal bowel hygiene.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 46 residents which included 16 residents. The facility failed to maintain an effective infecti...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility reported a census of 46 residents which included 16 residents. The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program to prevent cross contamination and the prevention infection related to urinary catheter care and services provided to one sampled Resident (R )9 with a urinary catheter/urine collection bag.
Findings included:
- Review of resident (R)9's undated Physician Orders, documentation included diagnoses of retention of urine, injury of a kidney unspecified, and the need for assistance with personal cares.
The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the resident with the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating cognitively intact. She used an indwelling urinary catheter.
The Urinary Incontinence/Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/03/24, included the resident used an indwelling urinary catheter.
The care plan for indwelling catheter, dated 12/04/23, directed the staff to position the catheter bag and tubing away from the entrance of the door.
On 01/10/24 at 01:12 PM, the resident sat in her recliner. Her trash can, which was beside her recliner, had her urinary catheter bag hanging on the outside of the trash can with the urine collection bag in direct contact with the floor.
On 01/10/24 at 01:12 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) MM confirmed the above finding and stated the resident's catheter bags should be positioned off the floor to prevent cross contamination and prevent infection.
On 01/17/24 at 10:13 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I, stated the resident's catheter bags should be positioned off the floor to prevent cross contamination and prevent infection.
On 01/17/24 at 12:49 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the staff should position the resident's urinary catheter collection bag off the floor to prevent cross contamination and prevent infection.
The facility lacked a policy regarding positioning a urine collection bags off the floor to prevent cross contamination and prevent infection.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure to ensure the resident's urinary catheter bag remained without direct contact with the floor to prevent cross contamination and infections.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - Review of R2's Physician Orders, dated 12/13/23, included diagnoses of fractured thoracic (middle section of the spine) verteb...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - Review of R2's Physician Orders, dated 12/13/23, included diagnoses of fractured thoracic (middle section of the spine) vertebra, repeated falls, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, unsteadiness of feet, urinary incontinence, peripheral neuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), hypertension (high blood pressure), overactive bladder, and gait (manner or style of walking) and balance abnormalities.
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance of staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. She had no functional limitations in range of motion of the upper or lower extremities. She was always incontinent of bowel, occasionally incontinent of urine, and did not have a toileting program. She experienced two or more non-injury falls and one fall with major injury. The resident received Occupational Therapy (OT) for four days and Physical Therapy (PT) for four days of the look back period.
The Discharge Return Anticipated MDS dated [DATE], documented the resident transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE].
The Entry MDS dated [DATE], documented the resident returned to the facility on [DATE].
The Cognitive Loss/ Dementia, Communication, and Falls Care Area Assessments (CAA), dated 09/15/23, documented the resident lacked orientation with memory and recall deficits related to dementia, change in mental status, and short term/long term memory loss. She had a history of falls prior to admission, weakness, and physical performance limitations that affected balance, gait, strength, and muscle endurance.
The Care Plan dated 12/22/23, included the following interventions:
On 05/21/19, staff were to remind the resident to lock the brakes on the wheelchair before transfers.
On 08/13/19, R2 experienced episodes of incontinence due to an overactive bladder if not toileted timely . (The care plan lacked any instruction staff on when to toilet the resident.)
On 11/07/22, therapy was to screen, and staff would initiate a bladder diary to determine a toileting schedule.
On 01/26/23, staff were to know the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and exhibited some restlessness and anxiety prior to a fall. R2 wandered into the wrong room and attempted to transfer to a bed unassisted. Nursing staff were to monitor the resident for behaviors every shift. If R2 was restless or anxious, staff were to report to the nurse to assess and treat. Staff would repeat urinalysis (UA). In addition, staff were to adjust the resident's bed height to a lower position for improved transfers.
On 01/28/23, therapy assessed the resident's wheelchair, R2's positioning in the wheelchair, and therapy adjusted the wheelchair. Staff were to remind her to call for assistance for bathroom use.
On 08/16/23, the facility asked R2's family to take Crocs (rubberized slip-on shoes) home. Staff were to encourage the resident to wear her tennis shoes. Staff would know the resident liked to wear her Crocs and remind her that they were not the safest footwear. Staff should remind the resident she cannot get up on her own and would know she may forget and may need reminders.
On 09/19/23, nursing staff were to encourage the resident to utilize the grab bar in the shower room and ensure the wheelchair brakes locked before transferring the resident to the shower chair.
On 09/20/23, R2 moved around the facility by self-propelling her wheelchair and would take assistance from staff if offered. The resident used bed rails to reposition and to get in and out of bed. The resident no longer used her walker for locomotion, but occasionally used the walker for transfers. The resident required two staff for transfers using a transfer belt and/or a mechanical lift as needed. Staff were to know the resident was forgetful and did not remember she needed assistance transferring. Staff were to keep pathways clear and decrease clutter to minimize the risk of falls. Staff were to keep the resident's wheelchair beside the bed. Staff were to ensure the resident wore secure footwear when out of bed. She sometimes lost her gripper socks and/or placed unsafe slippers over the gripper socks. Staff were to assist the resident in putting gripper socks back on.
On 10/09/23, staff were to obtain a UA for the resident.
On 11/14/23, staff were to lay R2 down after meals to prevent confusion and ensure safety.
Review of the Progress Notes and Fall Investigation Reports revealed the following concerns related to falls experienced by R2:
On 07/03/23 at 06:45 AM, the resident adjusted herself in the wheelchair and started to fall forward. Staff were able to catch the resident and assist her to the floor on her buttocks. The fall investigation report failed to identify causal factors to determine an immediate and appropriate intervention to prevent further falls.
On 08/13/23 at 07:33AM, two unidentified residents reported R2 got up from her wheelchair and fell. The intervention was to have family take R2's Crocs home and utilize sneakers.
On 08/15/23 at 01:30 PM, an unidentified CNA reported R2 had an unwitnessed fall from the toilet, resulting in a goose egg sized, raised area to the back of the resident's head. The documentation noted the casual factor of the fall as the resident was impulsive and sometimes confused and should not be left on the toilet by herself. She had uneven balance and did not have her walker at the time of the fall. The facility educated the unidentified CNA regarding the importance of staying with a dependent, cognitively impaired resident while the resident was on the toilet and to provide supervision, to prevent falls.
On 09/16/23 at 08:10 PM, R2 reported she attempted to transfer from the sofa to the wheelchair and fell to the floor. The fall was not witnessed, and the resident was noted to have severe cognitive impairment. The investigation lacked a causal factor and immediate appropriate intervention to prevent further falls. The facility placed an intervention to provide the unidentified CNA education.
On 09/19/23 at 09:05 PM, a n unidentified CNA reported they found R2 on the floor wearing a gown and socks. The resident reported she started to sit down, missed the chair, and landed on the floor.
On 10/08/23 at 11:15 PM, staff found the resident sitting on the floor in front of the bathroom. The investigation report failed to provide an immediate intervention to prevent further falls.
On 11/16/23 at 03:00 PM, the resident attempted to toilet herself and fell to the floor landing on her backside. She hit her head, causing a goose egg, which measured approximately two centimeters around, to the back of her head. The facility placed an intervention to prevent further falls, which included instructions to staff to remind the resident to use her call light for assistance for transfers and to ensure the resident used non-slip footwear. Review of the resident's care plan revealed both interventions were already implemented following previous falls. The Investigation Report, lacked a new immediate intervention to prevent further falls.
The Progress Note dated 11/27/23 at 01:30 PM, revealed R2 was in her wheelchair when an unidentified C ertified Nursing Assistant (CNA) served the resident's meal at 01:00 PM and left the room. Approximately five minutes later, an unidentified CNA heard a crash and found the resident on the floor with the bedside table on top of her. The nurse assessed the resident and called 911 for transport to the emergency room (ER).
The Progress notes dated 11/27/23 at 05:30 PM, documented the nurse received a call from the ER with a resident status update. She had fractures of thoracic spine.
The Hospital Discharge Summary dated 11/30/23, documentation included the resident sustained a fracture of the 10th and 11th vertebra of the thoracic (bones of the spine (mid back) following a fall on 11/27/23 at the nursing facility.
Review of the R2's Electronic Medical Record, (EMR) from 07/01/23 through 01/10/24, revealed the resident had a history of falls and experienced eight falls in the five months prior to the fall on 11/27/23 at 01:05 PM, which resulted in two fractured thoracic vertebrae.
Observation on 01/10/24 at 11:03 AM, revealed the resident sat in the wheelchair in the commons area. She wore multicolored Crocs, with her feet on the pedals of the wheelchair. A brace was visible beneath her shirt, that covered her chest wall.
On 01/11/24 at 09:30 AM, observed Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) P, CNA MM, and CNA NN transferred and provided toileting to R2. The staff transferred the resident to the toilet with a gait belt. R2 wore Crocs on her feet. The staff reported she wore her crocs all the time.
On 01/11/24 at 09:30 AM, CNA P reported the resident was at risk for falls and had several falls. The resident used to walk, and the staff could walk her back and forth to the bathroom but stated R2 had not walked in almost a year. CNA P said when a resident fell, the nurse should put an immediate intervention in place to prevent further falls. CNA P said tthe new interventions should be added to the care plan, and staff have access to the care plan for directions on caring for the resident.
On 01/17/24 at 10:13 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I stated when a resident fell, the charge nurse should do an assessment, which included vital signs, range of motion, and a head-to-toe skin assessment. If the fall was not witnessed or the resident hit their head, staff should complete a neurological assessment. The nurse should notify the physician, the resident representative, and the Director of Nursing. The charge nurse should initiate an investigation at the time of the fall to determine the cause. An immediate new and appropriate intervention should be put in place and communicated to the staff. LN I stated a resident with dementia was not a reliable reporter for the cause of the fall and it would not be appropriate for a resident with dementia to use an intervention to remind the resident to use a call light. A resident that required assistance with transfers to the toilet and was cognitively impaired should not be left unattended in the bathroom. Staff should use the resident's care plan for guidance for fall interventions. New staff were not familiar with long term care and the system to put new appropriate interventions on the resident's care plan immediately to prevent further falls.
On 01/17/24 at 01:15 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated on 11/27/23, R2 had an unwitnessed fall. The investigation revealed the probable cause was due to the resident reached for the wheeled end table and she fell. Administrative Nurse D stated the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and a history of multiple falls due to her poor impulse control where she would try to stand, transfer, and toilet herself without staff assistance. Staff had R2 transported to the hospital for an evaluation and R2 was admitted due to fractured vertebras. She was sent back to the facility with a brace to stabilize her fractured vertebrae. Staff removed the wheeled table from the resident's room and replaced it with a stationary table. The charge nurse should initiate a new immediate and appropriate fall intervention to prevent further falls. The resident's BIMS score should be 13 or higher for resident education to be an appropriate intervention. R2's interventions were not appropriate, and no new interventions were put in place to prevent further falls prior to the resident falling on 11/27/23, which resulted in fractures.
The 02/2017 facility's policy for Clinical Care Systems Guidelines for Falls did not address initiating a new, immediate, and appropriate intervention based on causal factors of each fall experienced by a resident, in order to prevent further falls.
The facility failed to iniate/implement, new immediate, appropriate interventions on the residents care plan to prevent further falls for cognitively impaired R2, who had multiple falls.
The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 16 residents sampled. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for three sampled Residents (R)27 regarding revising the care plan to include an intervention following one fall, R 33 regarding revising the care plan to include staff instruction for verbalizations of suicidal tendencies, and R 2 regarding revising the care plan to include interventions following multiple falls.
Findings included:
- Review of Resident (R)33 electronic medical record (EMR) included the following diagnoses: insomnia (the inability to sleep) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).
The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others on one to three days of the assessment period with no impact on the resident or others. He received an antidepressant (medication used to treat depression) medication.
The Behavioral Symptoms Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/11/23, documented the resident had physical and verbal abusive behaviors towards staff with risk factors which included injuring himself and others.
The Quarterly MDS, dated 01/10/24, documented the resident had a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Delusions (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue) were present. He had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, one to three days of the assessment period, with no impact to the resident or others. He received an antidepressant medication.
The care plan, revised 01/02/24, lacked staff instruction for verbalizations of suicidal tendencies, identified on the 10/11/23 behavior CAA.
Review of the EMR revealed the following physician's order:
Celexa (an antidepressant medication), 10 milligrams (mg), by mouth (po), every day (QD), for depression, ordered 12/27/23.
Review of the resident's EMR from 12/18/23 through 01/15/24, revealed the resident had multiple behaviors documented.
Review of the resident's EMR on 12/27/23, revealed the resident requested for the staff to bring him a gun so he could shoot himself. Staff notified the resident's physician and an antidepressant medication was ordered on that date. The resident later told staff he had been frustrated and had no tendencies of suicide.
On 01/16/24 at 01:52 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N stated the resident would make comments regarding wanting to kill himself. When the resident would say this, CNA N stated she would let the nurse know and she would talk with the resident until he felt better.
On 01/17/24 at 09:22 AM, Administrative Nurse E stated the resident would make comments about wanting to kill himself, but he would then say that he was only expression frustration. He was started on an antidepressant medication. Administrative Nurse E confirmed staff instruction for the resident's suicidal tendencies should be care planned.
The facility policy for Care Plans, effective October 2023, included: Care plans will be developed for all residents based upon the RAI manual guidelines. Care plans are developed by the interdisciplinary team and revised as needed according to resident status or change.
The facility failed to include preventative care plan interventions regarding this dependent resident's suicidal tendencies.
- The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 01/02/24, for Resident (R)27, documented a diagnosis of weakness.
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and extensive assistance of one staff for locomotion on the unit with the use of a wheelchair. He had no limitations in his range of motion (ROM) and no falls since the prior assessment.
The Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/02/23, documented the resident had a history of falls due to weakness and had impaired gait and mobility which required him to have staff assistance with transfers.
The Quarterly MDS, dated 11/01/23, documented the resident had a BIMS score of five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and extensive assistance of one staff for locomotion on the unit with the use of a wheelchair and had no limitation in his ROM. He had one fall with injury (except major) since his prior assessment.
The falls care plan, revised 01/08/24, instructed staff that the resident would forget he was unable to stand on his own, creating possible safety risks. Staff were to help remind him of safety issues. He had anti-tip brakes applied to his wheelchair to prevent the wheelchair from rolling backwards if he did attempt to stand up on his own. Staff were to keep the resident in the front commons area between meals. The resident received physical therapy (PT) following a prior fall. The care plan lacked staff instruction on obtaining a UA for this resident following his fall on 12/23/23.
Review of the resident's EMR revealed Fall Assessments which placed the resident at a high risk for falls, dated: 06/11/23, 09/11/23 and 10/30/23.
Review of a Fall Report, dated 12/23/23 and provided by the facility, revealed the resident had a witnessed fall on 12/23/23 in the front commons room when he attempted to stand up from his wheelchair, took a couple of steps and fell to the floor, landing on his right side. The resident had a decrease in his ROM on his right upper extremity and was transported to the ER for evaluation, where it was found he had a re-fracture of his right clavicle (collar bone). Staff were following all fall interventions at the time of the fall. The new intervention for the fall was to obtain a urine sample for a urinalysis (UA-lab analysis of urine) to check for a urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system).
Review of the resident's EMR lacked a lab result for the UA which had been ordered on 12/23/23.
On 01/17/24 at 01:15 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated all new fall interventions are to be added to the care plan at the time they are initiated.
The facility policy for Care Plans, effective October 2023, included: Care plans will be developed for all residents based upon the RAI manual guidelines. Care plans are developed by the interdisciplinary team and revised as needed according to resident status or change.
The facility failed to review and revise the care plan for this dependent resident who experienced a fall to prevent further falls.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - Review of Resident (R)2's Physician Orders, dated 12/13/23 included diagnoses of fractured vertebrae (Fx-broken bones of the b...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - Review of Resident (R)2's Physician Orders, dated 12/13/23 included diagnoses of fractured vertebrae (Fx-broken bones of the back) repeated falls, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), iron deficient anemia, congestive heart failure (fluid around the heart which impairs the heart's ability to pump), traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding of the brain) without loss of consciousness, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, unsteadiness of feet, major depression disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues , psychotic mood disorder(any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception), constipation, pain, peripheral neuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), hypertension, hypothyroidism, obstructive apnea, overactive bladder, asthma (disorder of narrowed airways that caused wheezing and shortness of breath), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), gait and balance abnormalities, and history of falling.
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident received medications which included insulin injections for six days of the look back period. She had six insulin order changes during the look back period. The staff reported the resident demonstrated indicators of pain on one to two days of the look back period.
The Quarterly MDS, dated 12/07/23, documented changes which included the resident received medication antianxiety, antidepressant, anticoagulants and opioid, antiplatelets for seven days of the look back period. She reported frequent pain that did not interfere with her sleep. The resident was not able to rate her level of pain. She received prn (as needed) pain medication.
The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) and Psychosocial Wellbeing CAA, dated 09/15/23, documented the resident had orientation, memory, and recall deficits. It included factors with dementia, change in mental status, and short term/long term memory loss.
The Care Plan dated 12/23/23 directed staff to administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness.
Review of the pharmacist's Monthly Medication Regimen Review, (MMRR) dated 06/17/23 through 12/04/23, revealed the following concerns:
1. (MMRR) dated 07/18/23, for discontinuation of Singular was not followed-up by the physician or the facility until 08/31/23 (31 days) after the recommendation was made. The physician discontinued the medication.
2. (MMRR) dated 08/2023 identified the facility lack of follow-up to the Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review, dated 07/18/23.
3. The resident lacked a (MMRR) for 09/2023.
4. The resident lacked a (MMRR) for 10/2023.
On 01/17/24 at 07:57 AM, Administrative Nurse E confirmed the above findings and stated the pharmacist should review the resident's medication regimen monthly and report any irregularities such as side effects medication interactions and gradual dose reductions. The pharmacist's recommendations should be acted upon in a timely manner within 10 days of receiving the recommendations.
On 01/17/24 at 02:30 PM, the pharmacist was not available for interview.
The facility policy for Medication Regimen Review, effective 11/28/16, included: The facility shall provide the resident's attending physician, Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing Services with copies of the Medication Regimen Review. The facility shall encourage the physician to act upon the recommendations in a timely manner.
The facility failed to act upon the identified irregularities by the consulting pharmacist on 07/18/23 in a timely manner. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the resident received a MMRR by the pharmacist as required to monitor for any medication irregularities.
- Review of Resident (R)29's Physician Orders, dated 12/13/23 included diagnoses cirrhosis (chronic degenerative disease of the liver), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD-backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus), urinary tract infection, arthritis (inflammation of a joint characterized by pain, swelling, redness and limitation of movement), cerebrovascular accident (CVA/stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiplegia(paralysis of one side of the body)/hemiparesis(muscular weakness of one half of the body), and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear).
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating cognitive intact. The resident received medications which included prn (as needed) pain medication during the look back period.
The Quarterly MDS, dated 11/15/23, documented changes which included the resident received medication of antianxiety, antidepressant, diuretics, and antiplatelets during the look back period. She reported frequent pain that did not interfere with her sleep. The resident was not able to rate her level of pain. She received prn pain medication. She reported occasional pain rated at 02/10.
The Care Plan dated 11/15/23, directed staff to administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness of the resident's medications.
Review of the pharmacist's Monthly Medication Regimen Review, (MMRR) dated 06/17/23 through 12/04/23, revealed the following concerns:
1. The resident lacked a (MMRR) for 09/2023.
2. The resident lacked a (MMRR) for 10/2023.
On 01/17/24 at 07:57 AM, Administrative Nurse E confirmed the above findings and stated the pharmacist should review the resident's medication regimen monthly and report any irregularities such as side effects medication interactions and gradual dose reductions. The pharmacist's recommendations should be acted upon in a timely manner within 10 days of receiving the recommendations.
On 01/17/24 at 02:30 PM, the pharmacist was not available for interview.
The facility policy for Medication Regimen Review, effective 11/28/16, included: The facility shall provide the resident's attending physician, Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing Services with copies of the Medication Regimen Review. The facility shall encourage the physician to act upon the recommendations in a timely manner.
The facility failed to ensure the resident received a MMRR by the pharmacist as required to monitor for any medication irregularities.
- The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 01/02/24, for Resident (R)27, documented the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder (MDD-major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness), hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland) and hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure).
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident received an antidepressant (medication to treat depression), an anticoagulant (a medication which thins the blood) and an opioid (medications used to treat pain) seven out of seven days of the look back assessment period.
The Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/02/23, documented the resident received psychotropic medications to manage his psychiatric conditions. A pharmacist consultant would review his medications monthly and make needed recommendations.
The Quarterly MDS, dated 11/01/23, documented the resident had a BIMS score of five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He received antidepressant, anticoagulant and opioid medications during the lookback assessment period.
The care plan for medications with Black Box Warnings (BBW- highest safety-related warning that medications can have assigned by the Food and Drug Administration), revised 01/08/24, instructed staff the resident took medications with BBWs and to monitor for side effects of the medications.
Review of the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following physician's orders:
Tramadol (an opioid pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg), by mouth (po) every (Q) eight hours, for pain, ordered 03/07/23.
Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication) 2.5 mg, po twice daily (BID), for deep vein thrombosis (DVT - potentially life-threatening blood clot, usually in the legs), ordered 02/25/23.
Lexapro (an antidepressant medication) 10 mg, po BID, for depression, ordered 02/24/23.
Review of the resident's EMR revealed it lacked a pharmacy consultant review for the months of September and October 2023.
On 01/17/24 at 12:54 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she did not know what the prior director of nursings (DON) system was for the pharmacy consultant recommendations so not all the recommendations from June 2023 to present could be found.
The facility policy for Medication Regimen Review, effective 11/28/16, included: The facility shall provide the resident's attending physician, Medical Director and the Director of Nursing Services with copies of the Medication Regimen Review. The facility shall encourage the physician to act upon the recommendations in a timely manner.
The facility failed to follow up with pharmacy recommendations to ensure this resident did not experience adverse effects of medications.
The facility reported a census of 46 residents with 16 selected for review which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for two Residents (R)2 and R29, of the five sampled residents, and failed to ensure pharmacy reviews for October 2023 and November 2023 for the five sampled residents R15, R23, R2, R29 and R27 .
Findings included:
- Review of Resident (R)23's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), pain hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident received scheduled pain medications. The resident received antipsychotics (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality) on a routine basis and received diuretic (medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine), antidepressant (class of medications used to treat mood disorders), and opioid (narcotic) medications.
The Psychotropic (a medication used to alter mood or thought) Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/08/23, assessed the resident received psychotropic medications.
The Care Plan reviewed 11/27/23, instructed staff to monitor, document and report any adverse reactions to psychotropic medications and to consult with the pharmacy and the medical doctor to consider dose reduction.
On 10/05/21 the physician instructed staff to administer Milk of Magnesia, 30 milliliters, every 24 hours as needed for constipation (difficulty passing stools)
On 08/10/23 the physician instructed staff to administer Abilify (an antipsychotic medication 2 milligrams (mg) daily for dementia with behaviors.
On 12/19/23 the physician instructed staff to administer mirtazapine 7.5 milligrams at night for insomnia (inability to sleep).
On 01/03/24 the physician instructed staff to administer levothyroxine, 125 micrograms, every morning for hypothyroidism.
On 01/09/24, the physician instructed staff to administer Metformin, 500 milligrams twice a day for diabetes.
Review of the resident's EMR revealed it lacked a pharmacy consultant review for the months of September and October 2023.
Interview, on 01/16/24 at 01:20 PM, with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M, revealed the resident had several falls that caused the bruise on her face.
On 01/17/24 at 12:54 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she did not know what the prior director of nursing (DON) system was for the pharmacy consultant recommendations so not all the recommendations from June 2023 to present could be found.
The facility policy for Medication Regimen Review, effective 11/28/16, included: The facility shall provide the resident's attending physician, Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing Services with copies of the Medication Regimen Review. The facility shall encourage the physician to act upon the recommendations in a timely manner.
The facility failed to follow-up on pharmacy recommendations to ensure this resident did not experience adverse effects of medications.
- Review of Resident (R)15's Physician Order Sheet dated 12/13/23, revealed diagnoses included Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk).
.
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired decision making. The resident was rarely/never understood. The resident received antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality), antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people), and antidepressant (class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medications. The resident received antipsychotics on a routine basis.
The Psychotropic (a medication that alters mood or thought) Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 10/27/23, triggered secondary to use of psychotropic med to manage psychiatric illness/condition. A licensed nurse monitors for side effects every shift, and the physician was to be notified of any abnormal findings. A pharmacist consultant will review medications monthly and the PCP (Primary Care Physician) will review medications with each visit. Contributing factors include current history of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest)/psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment perception)/insomnia (inability to sleep).
The Cognitive Loss CAA, dated 10/27/23, assessed the resident was unable to always make her needs known. Staff assist the resident with all cares.
The Care Plan reviewed 11/02/23, instructed staff to monitor for bowel movement each shift and offer the as needed (PRN) laxative for constipation and monitor for effectiveness when given.
On 11/20/20, the physician instructed staff to administer bupropion hydrochloride, 150 mg, every 12 hours daily for depression.
On 03/03/22, the physician instructed staff to administer Milk of Magnesia Suspension (a laxative), 30 milliliters, every 24 hours as needed for constipation per standing order.
On 03/24/23 the physician instructed staff to administer ibuprofen, 200 mg, two, tablets, every six hours, for dental pain.
On 10/31/23 the physician instructed staff to administer olanzapine 2.5 mg, every other day for dementia with behaviors.
On 12/28/23 the physician instructed staff to administer lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) three times a day for anxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people).
Review of the resident's EMR lacked a pharmacy consultant review for the months of September and October 2023.
On 01/17/24 at 12:54 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she did not know what the prior director of nursing (DON) system was for the pharmacy consultant recommendations so not all the recommendations from June 2023 to present could be found.
The facility policy for Medication Regimen Review, effective 11/28/16, included: The facility shall provide the resident's attending physician, Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing Services with copies of the Medication Regimen Review. The facility shall encourage the physician to act upon the recommendations in a timely manner.
The facility failed to follow-up on pharmacy recommendations to ensure this resident did not experience adverse effects of medications.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria.
Findings included:
- During an initial tour of the kitchen on 01/11/24 at 08:01 AM, the following areas of concern were noted.
1. The stationary can opener had a build-up of dried on food substance on the cutting tip of the opener.
2. Six cutting boards were heavily grooved making the surfaces unsanitizable.
3. The inside of the microwave had dried on food on the top, sides and bottom.
4. A plastic container holding the roll of clear food wrap had a build-up of food substances and dust.
5. The two-door reach-in refrigerator had spilled, dried chocolate milk in several places on the inside.
6. The ice machine vents had a heavy build-up of dust.
On 01/16/24 at 03:49 PM, Dietary staff BB confirmed the above areas needed to be cleaned.
The facility policy for Kitchen Cleanliness, undated, documented the Certified Dietary Manager would oversee ensuring the kitchen was always kept clean.
The facility failed to prepare and serve food to the resident sof the facility under sanitary conditions to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, (CMS) complete and acc...
Read full inspector narrative →
The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS {i.e., Payroll Base Journal (PBJ)}, related to licensed nursing staff coverage 24 hours a day.
Findings included:
- Review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the third quarter of fiscal year (FY) 2023, (04/01/23-06/30/23), revealed the lack of a License Nurse (LN) for 24 hours/seven days a week (24/7) on 04/01 Saturday (SA); 04/09 Sunday (SU); 04/15 (SA); 04/29 (SA); 04/30 (SU); 05/13 (SA); 05/14 (SU); 05/20 (SA); 05/27 (SA); 05/28 (SU); 06/04 (SU); 06/18 (SU); 06/24 (SA); and 06/25 (SU).
Review of the facility's time sheets for licensed nursing staff on the above dates, revealed the facility had the required licensed nursing staff 24 hours each day, as required. However, the facility reported inaccurate staffing data, as required, on seven days of the above quarter.
Review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for fiscal year (FY) 2023, for the fourth quarter of 2023, (07/01/23-09/30/23), revealed the lack of a License Nurse (LN) for 24 hours/seven days a week 24/7) on 07/02 (SU); 07/08 (SA); 07/15 (SA); 07/29 (SA); 08/12 (SA); 08/19 (SA); 08/27 (SU); 09/02 (SA); and 09/03 (SU).
Review of the facility's time sheets for licensed nursing staff on the above dates revealed the facility had the required licensed nursing staff 24 hours each day, as required. However, the facility reported inaccurate staffing data, as required, on these 9 days of the above quarter.
On 01/16/24 at 02:58 PM, Administrative Staff A confirmed the facility PBJ reporting to Centers for Medicare Services CMS lacked accurate data to reflect direct care provided by administrative nursing staff (RN) when providing direct care. He stated the facility did have 24-hours of a LN on duty each day. The above dates on the PBJ which did not reflect LN staffing was not accurate. Further explanation revealed the facility corporate pulled data from the time clock and should notify the facility of irregularities such as if the shift is covered by the Director of Nursing Services DNS (census less than 60).
The facility lacked a policy to address the submission of accurate PBJ staffing report to CMS.
The facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS {i.e., Payroll Base Journal (PBJ)}, related to licensed nursing staff 24/7.