CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview,...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)31 or his representative with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when R31 was transferred to the hospital. This placed R31 at risk for not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility.
Findings included:
- R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system).
R31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R31 required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use. R31 required staff supervision with locomotion on and off unit, personal hygiene, and eating.
R31's Care Plan, revised 10/03/23, documented R31 had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and instructed staff to monitor his fluid intake and urine output per physician orders, provide catheter care every shift and as needed (PRN). The care plan instructed staff to change R31's catheter every 30 days and PRN, empty it every shift and PRN, ensure R31's catheter tubing and bag did not touch the floor or become elevated above his bladder and to ensure R31's catheter was appropriately positioned during transfer to prevent any obstruction.
R31's Progress Notes, dated 05/31/23 at 09:34PM, documented R31 was transferred to the hospital.
Review of R31's clinical record lacked evidence the resident or representative was provided the facility bed hold policy.
On 10/24/23 at 11:44 AM, observation revealed R31 rested in bed on his left side; staff entered the room and repositioned him on his back.
On 10/26/23 at 10:50 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) FF verified R31 or his representative was not provided a bed hold policy when he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and stated the facility did not provide the bed hold policy to residents who received Medicaid when they are transferred to the hospital.
On 10/30/23 at 11:51 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated nursing staff were responsible for providing residents the bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. Administrative Nurse D stated R31 should have received the bed hold notice even if he received Medicaid services.
The facility's Bed/Unit-Hold Policy, revised 05/28/2019, documented upon admission or transfer, the resident and family member or legal representative or surrogate would review and be informed that the facility would hold a bed/unit for residents on medical or non-medical leave, as requested and agreed upon. Staff should verify Medicaid and private insurer's bed/unit-hold coverage.
The facility failed to provide R31 or his representative with the bed hold policy when he was transferred to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk for not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interview...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 40 which addressed his edema and related needs. This placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs.
Findings included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R40 documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), weakness, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), other symptoms and signs with cognitive functions and awareness.
The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R40 had intact cognition and required supervision and one staff assistance for transfers, ambulation, dressing, and toileting. The MDS further documented R40 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no skin issues.
The Significant MDS, dated 08/08/23, documented R40 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, extensive assistance of one staff for dressing, ambulation in room, and personal hygiene. The MDS further documented R40 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no skin issues.
R40's Care Plan lacked documentation of his diagnosis of edema and interventions to prevent edema.
R40's Physician Order, dated 01/06/23, directed staff to administer spironolactone (a diuretic medication), 50 milligrams (mg), by mouth, twice per day, for the diagnosis of edema.
R40's Physician Order, dated 04/28/23, directed staff to apply compression stockings (designed to apply pressure to your lower legs, helping to maintain blood flow and reduce discomfort and swelling), for knee-high edema, on in the morning and off in the evening.
On 10/24/23 at 01:01 PM, observation revealed R40 sat in a recliner in the living room pod. R40 did not have compression socks on. Further observation revealed nursing students placed a pillow under his legs.
On 10/25/23 at 10:00 AM, observation revealed R40 sat in his wheelchair, and did not have his compression socks on.
On 10/26/23 at 07:36 AM, observation revealed R40 sat in a recliner in the living room pod with his feet elevated. R40 had no compression socks on, and his ankles appeared edematous.
On 10/30/23 at 09:36 AM, observation revealed R40 sat in a recliner in the living room pod with his feet elevated. He had no compression socks on, and his ankles appeared edematous.
On 10/26/23 at 12:06 PM, Administrative Nurse E verified that there was not a care plan related to R40's edema and stated it was everyone's responsibility to put interventions on the care plan. Administrative Nurse E further stated she looked through nurse's notes and talked to staff before the care plan meetings to see if there was anything new to put on the care plan.
On 10/30/23 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the care plan should reflect the resident and his edema related cares should be on the care plan.
The facility's Care Plan policy, dated 07/28/22, documented a person-centered plan of care as developed for each resident by the interdisciplinary team, through assessments within the established timeframes, according to state and federal regulations. Each discipline would be responsible for identifying problems, management of avoidable declines in functioning, and establishing goals for the person-centered plan of care. Problems & goals would focus on building upon resident strengths, their needs, and personal, as well as cultural preferences identified in the admission assessment.
The facility failed to develop a plan of care for R40's edema. This placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 resident. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 resident. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise Residents (R) 38's care plan to include fluid restriction quantities, which placed R38 at risk of complication related to hydration status, dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) treatment and history of urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system) due to uncommunicated care needs.
Findings included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnosis of acute kidney failure, end stage renal failure (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in the kidney that causes swelling), multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), history of UTI's, bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood), acidosis (excess acid in the body fluids), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS- abnormally increased motility of the small and large intestines), history of venous thrombosis (clot that developed within a blood vessel) and embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the blood stream), and abdominal pain.
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R38 had intact cognition, was independent with eating, required partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing self, upper and lower body dressing, to roll left to right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair/bed transfer, and toilet transfers.
The Activity of Daily Living Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/19/23, documented R38 went to dialysis three times a week and family member transported the resident.
The Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/19/23, documented R38 received a therapeutic renal diet with a 1500 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction; R38 received hemodialysis three times a week which would cause weight fluctuation.
R38's Care Plan, dated 09/28/23, documented R38 went to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. The care plan directed staff to monitor shunt thrill (a fine vibration felt which reflects the blood flow by a dialysis resident's shunt) and bruit (blowing or swishing sound heard when blood flows through a shunt)every shift and report concerns to dialysis; educate resident and family to any restrictions related to dialysis such as diet/fluids, and continue a 1500 ml fluid restriction. The care plan lacked direction to staff as to dietary and nursing department specification on interdisciplinary communication of fluid intake.
R38's Physician Order dated 09/22/23, directed staff to provide a regular diet and 1500 ml fluid restriction in 24 hours.
R38's EMR lacked evidence staff monitored and recorded fluid intake until 10/09/23. R38's EMR further lacked documentation of fluid intake for the day shift two out of 14 opportunities; evening shift lacked documentation for eight of 14 opportunities, and night shift lacked 11 of 14 opportunities.
On 10/26/23 at 11:11 AM, observation revealed R38 sat in her recliner with a family member present. R38 was alert, watched TV with her feet elevated and covered with a blanket. R38 reported she took paperwork with her to the dialysis center on treatment days and returned with the paper which she gave to staff. R38 verified the facility had not weighed her consistently before or after dialysis treatment but stated the dialysis center did weight her. R38 reported she had a 1500 ml in 24-hour fluid restriction and had to ask for fluids. R38 stated she expected nursing staff were monitoring the amounts she consumed.
On 10/26/23 at 12:52 PM, Consultant GG stated the nursing staff provided the resident fluid and tracked the fluid intake. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O stated she was instructed to provide R38 a medium glass of fluids with meals, which consisted of 360 mls.
On 10/30/23 at 09:37 AM CNA P reported R38 was on a fluid restriction but did not know the amount of the restriction.
On 10/30/23 at 09:48 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) J reported R38 received dialysis treatments three times a week. LN J verified R38 should have vital signs and weight before and after dialysis treatment and had physician order for a 1500 ml fluid restriction. LN J reported an intake and output record was kept in the resident's room so staff could record the intakes, and it was the nurse's responsibility to keep track of this information. LN J verified the lack of documented fluid intakes, weights, and completion of the Dialysis Communication Form.
On 10/30/23 at 12:57 PM Administrative Staff D stated the Dialysis Communication Form should be completed and accessible for staff to review in the EMR or left on the unit for the nursing staff if they should need to review information collected. Administrative Nurse D verified she expected nursing staff to complete the communication form before and after treatment, weight, take vital signs and monitor R38's fluid intake.
The facility's Hydration/Fluid Maintenance policy, dated 09/17/21, documented to identify residents admitted to the community with risk factors which can lead to dehydration. Determine through assessment of clinical conditions if sufficient fluid intake is being offered to the resident. Develop an appropriate preventative plan of care. Risk factors for the resident becoming dehydrated are fluid loss and increased fluid needs, fluid restriction secondary to renal dialysis, functional impairments, residents who forgets to drink or forgets how to drink, and refusal of fluids. The general procedure of using daily fluid need guidelines, determine if resident needs input monitoring, perform MDS/CAA process and develop plan of care, incorporate hydration plan based on the needs of the resident.
The facility failed to revise R38's care plan to include fluid restriction quantities between nursing and dietary departments, which placed R38 at risk of complications due to uncommunicated care needs.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary for one of the residents reviewed for discharge that included a completed recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) of the resident's stay and post discharge plan for Resident (R) 57. This placed the resident at risk for receiving inadequate care and missed care opportunities.
Findings included:
- R57's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE].
R57's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 09/12/23, documented R57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R57 required moderate staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, putting on and off footwear, supervision with lower body dressing, and was independent with eating, oral hygiene, and toileting. The MDS documented R57 expected to be discharged to the community.
R57's Care Plan, revised 09/12/23, documented R57 was in the facility for therapy and planned to discharge back to home.
The Nurse's Note, dated 10/13/23 at 12:37 AM, documented R57 would discharge from the facility to home on [DATE].
Review of R57's EMR lacked evidence of a complete discharge summary, which included a recapitulation of his stay.
On 10/26/23 at 02:21 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified R57's discharge summary lacked documentation regarding R57's status when he was admitted to the facility and stated the form is what the staff always used for recapitulation of resident's stay. Administrative Nurse D stated the Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) discharge notes would show R57's progression throughout his stay.
The facility's Anticipated Discharge Summary - Recapitulation of Stay Policy, revised 09/08/21, documented an interdisciplinary discharge summary should be completed for anticipated discharges. The discharge checklist-recapitulation of stay form would be completed at the time of the resident's discharge to summarize the resident's course of treatment and include all areas of the comprehensive assessment.
The facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of R57's stay and post discharge plan. This placed the resident at risk for receiving inadequate care and missed care opportunities.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with four reviewed for non-pressure related skin co...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with four reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 40 had his physician-ordered compression socks on to his legs daily due to his edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). This placed the resident at risk for complications from edema.
Findings included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R40 documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), weakness, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), other symptoms and signs with cognitive functions and awareness.
The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R40 had intact cognition and required supervision and one staff assistance for transfers, ambulation, dressing, and toileting. The MDS further documented R40 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no skin issues.
The Significant MDS, dated 08/08/23, documented R40 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, extensive assistance of one staff for dressing, ambulation in room, and personal hygiene. The MDS further documented R40 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no skin issues.
R40's Care Plan lacked documentation of his diagnosis of edema and interventions to prevent edema.
R40's Physician Order, dated 01/6/23, directed staff to administer spironolactone (a diuretic medication), 50 milligrams (mg), by mouth, twice per day, for the diagnosis of edema.
R40's Physician Order, dated 04/28/23, directed staff to apply compression stockings (designed to apply pressure to your lower legs, helping to maintain blood flow and reduce discomfort and swelling), for knee-high edema, on in the morning and off in the evening.
On 10/24/23 at 01:01 PM, observation revealed R40 sat in a recliner in the living room pod. R40 did not have compression socks on. Further observation revealed nursing students placed a pillow under his legs.
On 10/25/23 at 10:00 AM, observation revealed R40 sat in his wheelchair, and did not have his compression socks on.
On 10/26/23 at 07:36 AM, observation revealed R40 sat in a recliner in the living room pod with his feet elevated. R40 had no compression socks on, and his ankles appeared edematous.
On 10/30/23 at 09:36 AM, observation revealed R40 sat in a recliner in the living room pod with his feet elevated. He had no compression socks on, and his ankles appeared edematous.
On 10/30/23 at 12:15 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R stated R40 would take his compression socks off by himself at times.
On 10/30/23 at 12:30 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated R40 was supposed to have compression socks on in the morning and taken off at night. LN H stated that the aides should have helped R40 apply the compression stockings.
On 10/30/23 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated R40 should have his compression socks on every morning.
Upon request a policy for edema/compression socks was not provided.
The facility failed to ensure R40 had his physician-ordered compression socks applied to his legs daily to treat his edema. This placed the resident at risk for complications from edema.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview,...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions placed to prevent, or promote healing of pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for Resident (R)1 when the facility failed to implement the pressure reducing cushion as directed by R1's plan of care and R1 developed a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis including intact or ruptured blisters) pressure injury to the coccyx (area at the base of the spine) area. This also placed the resident at risk for further unhealed pressure injuries, pain and infection.
Findings included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting right dominant side, facial weakness, spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), bacteriuria (presence of bacteria in the blood), pyuria (excess of white blood cells or pus in urine), retention of urine, dysfunction of bladder, cystocele (when the bladder bulges into the vagina), rectocele (tissue wall which separates the rectum from the vagina is weakened and leads to the vaginal wall to bulge), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), and an unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel.
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 had severe cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximum assistance with eating, upper and lower body dressing, and rolling left to right. R1 was dependent on toileting hygiene, bathing, , putting on/taking off footwear, personal hygiene, lying to sitting on side of bed, chair/bed to chair transfers, and toilet transfers. The MDS further documented R1 had an indwelling catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag), received pain and antidepressant medications (class of medications used to treat mood disorders). R1 was at risk for developing pressure ulcer injury, had one unstageable deep tissue injury, and a pressure reducing device for bed and chair. The MDS lacked information related to turning schedule, pressure ulcer care, and application of nonsurgical dressings to feet.
The Pressure Ulcer Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/24/23, documented R1 was admitted to facility after hospitalization for a stroke, and had hemiparesis of the right dominant side. R1 had an indwelling catheter with a diagnosis of neuromuscular (nerve damage which the brain does not communicate with the bladder) dysfunction of bladder and a history of UTI. R1 required two staff assist with dressing, transfers, toileting, bed mobility, and used a mechanical lift for transfers. R1 had an unstageable deep tissue injury (DTI- purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear) to the right heel, had a pressure relieving mattress and a cushion in her wheelchair/recliner.
The Braden Scale (standardized tool used for predicting pressure ulcers), dated 09/11/23, 09/18/23, 09/25/23, 10/02/23, and 10/09/23 scored R1 was at severe risk for the development of pressure ulcers.
R1's Care Plan, dated 09/11/23, documented R1 was at risk for pressure ulcers and other skin impairment due to stroke and hemiplegia. The care plan documented the use of a low air loss mattress due to recent stroke and limited mobility. The plan directed R1 had changes in activities of daily living (ADL), used a mechanical lift with two staff assist when transferring, and required assistance with repositioning, toileting, and transfers. The plan directed R1 preferred to have a Roho (pressure relief cushion that is made of soft, flexible air cells) cushion in the recliner and wheelchair to assist with off- loading pressure for pressure relief.
R1's Care Plan included a revision dated 09/28/23 which directed staff to clean R1's coccyx with normal saline (NS), pat dry, apply Skin-prep (liquid skin protectant) to the area and cover with a foam dressing; change every three to seven days and as needed (prn) as a preventative measure once daily.
R1's Care Plan documented a revision dated 10/03/23 which directed R1 preferred to have decubitus (pressure ulcer) boots on at all times except during transfers or working with therapy, to off load pressure to the heels. The care plan revision also directed staff to cleanse the fluid filled blister to the right inner heel with NS, pat dry, apply Skin-prep to the area and cover with a foam dressing. Staff were to change the dressing every day and prn until healed for Stage 2 pressure ulcer to the inner heel.
The Interdisciplinary Note (IDT) dated 09/10/23 at 07:07 AM, documented R1 was admitted to the facility related to a recent stroke affecting the right upper and lower extremities. R1 had an indwelling catheter, was incontinent of bowel, and had a few skin concerns to right hand/finger in the form of mild edema and hand or sores/pressure areas at the time.
The Physician Order, dated 09/21/23, directed staff to monitor dressing and coccyx every shift for changes as preventative measure. The order further directed staff may cleanse with NS, pat dry, apply Skin-prep to area and cover with a foam dressing every three to seven days and prn.
The Physician Order, dated 09/25/23, directed staff to monitor bruises on R1's right heel every shift for spreading and skin breakdown; apply Skin-prep, and float heels when in bed or sitting in chair.
The Skin Evaluation Record, dated 09/29/23, documented R1's right heel bruise; staff were to monitor.
The Skin Evaluation Record, dated 10/01/23, documented R1 right heel had a fluid filled blister measuring two centimeters (cm) in length and one cm in width, and treatment of Skin-prep and foam dressing.
The IDT Note dated 10/02/23 at 02:25 PM, documented R1 had a fluid filled blister to the right inner heel, Skin-prep and foam dressing applied, decubitus boots on, and had redness to both heels.
The IDT Note dated 10/04/23 at 05:59 PM, documented R1 had been in bed with every two-hour repositioning due to pain while sitting. The note further documented R1's coccyx area opened, and staff were to ensure a Roho cushion in chair/wheelchair when in use and offloading pressure.
The Skin Evaluation Record, dated 10/20/23, documented R1's right heel was a partial thickness pressure injury wound. The blister fluid reabsorbed and had stable eschar (dead tissue) and measured 1.8 cm in length and 0.9 cm in width.
The Physician Order, dated 10/20/23, directed staff to discontinue treatment of cleansing coccyx wound.
On 10/25/23 at 09:34 AM observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) G changing dressing to R1's right heel. LN G cleansed the heel with NS, patted dry, and covered with a foam dressing. The wound base continued with eschar and had no redness or drainage. R1 sat in the wheelchair through breakfast and dressing change. R1's Roho cushion had not been placed in the wheelchair prior to going to breakfast and was not in the chair at the time of the observation. LN G verified the resident should have a Roho cushion in the chair.
On 10/26/23 at 08:00 AM observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S assisted R1 to turn to her side for morning hygiene care for the breakfast meal. R1 had soft bowel movement which took a significant amount of cleansing due to the dryness of old fecal material around the edges. Once the area had been cleansed, observation further revealed an open area to R1's coccyx area. Administrative Nurse F verified the area measured 1.8 cm in length and 1 cm width and had granulation tissue. Administrative Nurse F cleansed the area, placed Skin-prep around the area and placed a foam dressing to cover the area. Administrative Nurse F stated the area to R1's coccyx area would be classified as a Stage 2 pressure injury.
The Skin Evaluation Record, dated 10/26/23, documented R1 had a coccyx wound which measured 1.8 cm in width and 1.0 cm in length, with wound bed granulation (new tissue formed during wound healing), pressure area, and treated with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply incontinent barrier cream, may cover with foam dressing if needed.
On 10/30/23 at 12:57 PM Administrative Nurse D verified R1 had a history of pressure ulcers and was admitted without pressure ulcers. Administrative Nurse D stated she expected staff to ensure R1's Roho cushion placement when R1 was up to the chair.
The facility's Pressure Ulcer/Injury Prevention, Nursing Intervention and Wound Treatment policy, dated 08/30/22, documented all residents are considered to have some risk for the development of pressure ulcer/injuries. Nursing staff will evaluate skin integrity and tissue tolerance, implement preventative measures as indicated and treat skin breakdown. The primary care provider (PCP) admission orders authorize approval to begin using established ski and wound treatment guidelines.
The facility failed to ensure placement of the Roho cushion for R1 who developed a Stage 2 pressure ulcer to the coccyx. This also placed the resident at risk of or further skin breakdown, delayed healing and other wound complications.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with nine reviewed for accidents. Based on observat...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with nine reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment, free from preventable accident hazards, for three sampled residents who had falls, Resident (R) 26, R40, and R41. This placed the resident's at risk for further falls and injury.
Findings included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) falls, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), hypertension (high blood pressure), hereditary neuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), and insomnia (inability to sleep).
The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R26 had severely impaired cognition, and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers, and extensive assistance of one staff for toileting, personal hygiene. R26 required limited assistance of one staff for ambulation. The MDS further documented R26 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no falls.
R26's Quarterly MDS, dated 09/19/23, documented R26 had long and short-term memory problems and moderately impaired decision-making skills. R26 required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene; R26 required limited assistance of one staff for toileting and did not ambulate. The MDS further documented R26 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had one non-injury fall.
The Fall Risk Assessments, dated 05/23/23, 08/23/23, 09/06/23, and 09/21/23, documented R26 was a high risk for falls.
R26's Care Plan, dated 10/19/23, initiated on 06/18/23, directed staff to ensure R26 had non-slip footwear on to ensure she had proper traction with feet, and assist her with changing them at least twice throughout the night. The update, dated, 07/20/23, documented R26 preferred to have a mat next to her bed, and directed staff to adjust her bed in the lowest position when occupied; R26
preferred to have a concave mattress on her bed for edge awareness and preferred to lay on her fall mat at times. The plan directed staff if R26 was located on the fall mat, do not complete a fall [assessment] as she was able to lay on the fall mat at times. The update, dated, 09/06/23, directed staff were to offer/assist the resident to a recliner between meals. The update, dated 09/17/23, documented education was provided to staff when inquiring about R26 moving back in her wheelchair, and directed to assist her with moving her hips back to ensure that R26 was able to perform the task due to restlessness while in her wheelchair. The plan further directed R26 to be the last resident to the dining room, and staff were to transfer her to a standard chair to ensure safety.
The Fall Investigation, dated 07/19/23 at 04:48AM, documented R26 was on her fall mat, with her legs out straight, and a pillow behind her head. R26 stated she decided to get down there, put a pillow here so I could lay down, it felt better down here. The investigation further documented R26 was assessed without injury, and three staff assisted her up with a gait belt and placed her back into bed.
The Nurse's Note, dated 09/16/23 at 06:35 AM, documented R26 was observed lying on her floor mat with her pillow.
The Fall Investigation, dated 09/17/23, documented R26 was restless in her wheelchair and staff asked her to move her hips back in the wheelchair due to her being too close to the edge. R26 moved forward which caused her to fall onto the wheelchair foot pedals. The investigation further documented staff lowered R26 the rest of the way down to the floor.
The Nurse's Note, dated 09/23/23 at 09:30 PM, documented R26 was found lying on her double mat next to the bed with her eyes closed. R26 was unable to state the reason for getting up. Staff assessed with no injury noted, and R26 was assisted back to bed by two staff members.
On 10/24/23 at 01:22 PM, observation revealed R26 sat in her wheelchair in the living room pod. She was restless and tried to stand up out of her wheelchair, staff intervened.
On 10/26/23 at 08:12 AM, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N placed a gait belt around R26's waist and with the assistance of CNA O, transferred R26 into a recliner from her wheelchair.
On 10/26/23 at 8:18 AM, CNA O stated R26 could get impulsive and try to get up out of her wheelchair, so staff transfer into a recliner in the living room area. CMA R further stated, in bed she had fall mats and her bed was lowered to the floor.
On 10/26/23 at 02:00PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated if R26 was found on her fall mat, it was not considered a fall because she would put herself down on the mat. LN G further stated R26 was to be transferred into a recliner in the living room area, so staff could keep an eye on her.
On 10/30/23 at 10:00 AM, Administrative Nurse F stated when staff find R26 on her fall mat, it was not considered a fall since R26 would put herself on the mat. Administrative Nurse F stated the facility did not investigate incidents where R26 was found on the mat on the floor.
On 10/30/23 at 12:30 PM Administrative Nurse D stated should assist R26 to reposition in her wheelchair. Administrative Nurse D verified the facility staff did not investigate causes or question what might have happened when R26 was found on the floor mat, staff assumed R26 placed herself there.
The facility's Falls policy, dated 10/12/22, documented residents would be identified for risk of falls and interventions implemented to reduce the risk. The staff follow the Fall Guidelines for fall occurrences, document assessment of the resident, and investigate, review fall intervention reference sheet, and notify the responsible party, physician, and nurse supervisor. The residents with falls would be discussed weekly in risk management meetings to determine of possible interventions to prevent future falls.
The facility failed to provide supervision and a safe environment by investigating causative and contributing factors when R26 was found on the floor. This placed R26, who had falls out of bed and wheelchair, at risk for further falls and injury and potential unidentified abuse and/or neglect.
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R40 documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), weakness, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), other symptoms and signs with cognitive functions and awareness.
The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R40 had intact cognition and required supervision and one staff assistance for transfers, ambulation, dressing, and toileting. The MDS further documented R40 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no falls.
The Significant Change MDS, dated 08/08/23, documented R40 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R40required extensive assistance of one staff for dressing, ambulation in room, and personal hygiene. The MDS further documented R40 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no falls.
The Fall Risk Assessments, dated 12/15/22, 01/02/23, 01/15/23, 02/19/23, 03/17/23, 04/16/23, 05/14/23, 06/16/23, 07/21/23, 09/08/23, 10/03/23, and 10/28/23, documented R40 was a high risk for falls.
R40's Care Plan, dated 010/09/23, initiated on 01/02/23 directed staff to ensure his recliner remote was within his reach and easy access. The update, dated 01/09/23, directed staff to ensure his bed was in the position that was easiest for him to access. The update, dated 01/15/23, documented R40 preferred staff apply his gait belt prior to standing to assist him with his unsteady gait and ensure proper security. The update, dated 02/06/23, documented to educated R40 to call for assistance when ambulating independently in his room. The update, dated 02/13/23, documented R40 preferred staff increase visual checks on him as he would attempt to ambulate independently and had a decrease in strength. The update dated 02/22/23 documented R40 preferred a touch pad call light, call pendent, and preferred his recliner footrest down so that he may exit his recliner safely. The update, dated 05/03/23, directed staff to ensure that a gait belt was used so that staff can regain resident balance, and open the door to the spa room prior to ambulating R40 to the shower room. The update dated 05/17/23 directed staff to place a touch pad call light in his room to assist with easy activation with needing assistance and educate staff to ensure that his walker and wheelchair are not in front of each other rather side by side to ensure that resident was able to access each of the assistive devices. The update, dated 09/01/23, directed staff to place Dycem (holds objects firmly into place) to the recliner that when R40 was seated and does attempt to get up he is able to maintain his traction to ensure he was able to transfer safely. The update, dated 09/08/23, directed staff to place Dycem in his wheelchair to ensure R40 was able to reposition himself in the wheelchair without sliding out of the wheelchair, and ensure he has a reacher when in the recliner or wheelchair to assist with items on the floor. The update, dated, 10/19/23, documented education with staff to ensure to offer/assist R40 to use the bathroom between 0000 and 0400 daily to prevent independent transfers with toileting and work order placed to check for spiders.
The Fall Investigation, dated 01/02/23 at 08:30 AM, documented R40 was in his recliner and the footrest was in the elevated position. The remote to the recliner dropped to R40's right side, on the floor, and he was unable to get it to disengage his footrest. R40 shifted his weight which caused the recliner to tip forward and he slid to the floor. The investigation further documented staff were educated to ensure R40's recliner remote was in reach prior to exiting his room.
The Fall Investigation, dated 01/15/23 at 11:45 AM, documented R40 was standing with his walker and requested staff apply his gait belt and while doing so, he lost his balance and staff were unable to regain his balance and lowered him to the floor. Staff were educated to ensure that they apply his gait belt prior to standing and ensure the proper security withstanding and change in gait patterns.
The Fall Investigation, dated 02/13/23 at 03:40 AM, documented staff entered R40's room and noted him on the floor. The footrest to the recliner was in the elevated position, and it appeared R40 had exited the recliner to use the bathroom, lost his balance, and fell.
The Fall Investigation, dated 04/28/23 at 04:30 AM, documented staff was restocking his room towels and R40 got up unassisted, without his walker, lost his balance, and R40 was assisted to the floor by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA). The investigation further documented R40 was still in his day clothes and his pendent button was next to his recliner. The investigation documented R40 received a skin tear on his forearm from the CNA's fingernail which measured 2.5 centimeters (cm) x 1.7 cm. The staff were education to ensure R40's needs were met prior to completing any duties in the room and to ensure the resident was made aware of the CNA in the room.
The Fall Investigation, dated 05/03/23 at 08:15 PM, documented per video footage that staff assisted R40 to the shower room via his walker when the CNA slipped in front of him to open the shower door when he lost his balance with ambulation, and he fell. Staff were educated to ensure a gait belt was used so that staff are able to regain R40's balance and educated to open the spa room door prior to ambulating with the resident to the shower room.
The Fall Investigation, dated 07/21/23 at 05:53 PM, documented R40 returned from a surgical procedure and was positioned in the recliner and failed to have an assistive device within reach. The investigation further documented R40 was trying to get up and sat down on the floor. Staff were educated to have a walker or wheelchair positioned within reach for safety. The resident did not sustain any injury from fall.
The Fall Investigation, dated 09/01/23 at 07:00 AM, documented R40 was observed on the floor in front of his recliner with his feet out in front of him. R40 stated he did not fall, he slid out of his recliner. The investigation documented his recliner was tilted up and staff were educated to ensure his wheelchair was always next to him when he was in the recliner and bed to ensure he was able to transfer safely.
R40's EMR lacked documentation an assessment to determine if R40 could safely use the lift chair was completed.
On 10/25/23 at 10:00 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) H had a gait belt around R40's waist and assisted him to stand up from the toilet, pivot to his left, and he was able to sit down into his wheelchair. Observation revealed there was no Dycem in R40's wheelchair or recliner. LN H stated he had falls and staff try to keep him out in the living room pod in a recliner so that he does not try to get up on his own.
On 10/26/23 at 01:57 PM, CNA M stated he falls a lot because he tries to get up and ambulate alone, staff place him in a recliner in the living room pod to watch him better.
On 10/30/23 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated he had a lot of falls and staff should make sure that there was a gait belt on him for safety. Administrative Nurse D further stated they are starting to complete lift chair assessments on residents.
The facility's Falls policy, dated 10/12/22, documented residents would be identified for risk of falls and interventions implemented to reduce the risk. The staff follow the Fall Guidelines for fall occurrences, document assessment of the resident, and investigate, review fall intervention reference sheet, and notify the responsible party, physician, and nurse supervisor. The residents with falls would be discussed weekly in risk management meetings to determine, if possible, interventions to prevent future falls.
The facility failed to ensure R40 remained free from preventable accidents and hazards. This placed R40 at risk for further falls and injury.
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R41 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbances (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), chronic pain, and hypertension (high blood pressure).
The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R41 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. R41requried limited assistance of one staff for ambulation. The assessment further documented R41 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, had two injury falls and had two non-injury falls.
The Quarterly MDS, dated 07/21/23, documented R41 had severely impaired cognition and required limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, toileting, and dressing. The MDS further documented R41 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no falls.
The Fall Risk Assessments, dated 04/23/23, 06/08/23, 07/22/23, 08/-5/23, 09/10/23, 10/22/23, and 10/24/23, documented R41 was a high risk for falls.
R41's Care Plan, dated 10/09/23, initiated on 08/08/22, directed staff to provide frequent checks on the resident. The update, dated 11/17/22, directed staff to assist R41 to bed between 08:00 PM and 10:30 PM, and assisted her to get ready for bed. The update, dated 12/02/22, directed staff to place her touch pad call light next to her when she was in the recliner to ensure that she was able to activate it easily for assistance. The updated dated 12/05/22, directed staff to offer/assist her to use the bathroom with each shift change. The update, dated 2/14/23, directed staff to ensure my walker was in proper function and assist her back into bed if she did not want in the recliner. The update, dated 04/17, directed staff to resident's preference of height of the recliner remote and place the remote on her bedside to prevent her from accidently activating it, and apply Dycem (holds objects firmly into place) in her recliner cushion to prevent her from sliding out. The update, dated 06/08/23, directed staff to assist resident with using the bathroom prior to last rounds. The update, dated, 08/05/23, documented education was provided to staff of proper transfer techniques. The update, dated 08/11/23, documented education was provided to staff to lock the brakes on the wheelchair then encourage R41 to stand to transfer. The update, dated, 10/22/23, documented education was provided to the staff to not leave her alone in the bathroom as she will try to ambulate independently.
The Fall Investigation, dated 11/05/22 at 09:23 PM, documented R41 attempted to use the bathroom and transferred herself after completing her bedtime cares, lost her balance and fell. The staff was educated to assist R41 with her bedtime cares and not leave her alone in the bathroom.
The Fall Investigation, dated 12/02/23 at 03:55 PM, documented staff were alerted by another resident that R41 was on the floor and stated she had been in her recliner prior to her fall. The investigation further documented R41's call light was lying on the bed, and she was unable to activate it to notify staff that she was wanting to get up. Education was provided to staff to ensure that R41's touch pad call light was next to her when in the recliner.
The Fall Investigation, dated 02/14/23 at 09:31AM, documented staff offered to assist R41 into her recliner from her bed and she declined the assistance. The investigation further documented that R41 attempted to transfer herself with the use of her walker when is malfunctioned due to the leg of the walker bending which caused her to lose her balance and fall. The resident did not sustain any injury and the walker was taken back to therapy for a new walker and correct adjustment.
The Fall Investigation, dated 04/17/23 at 11:15 AM, documented R41 had inclined her recliner all the way up to the standing position and started to slip out of her recliner, attempted to reach for her walker, and fell. The staff witnessed the fall but were unable to stop her from falling. The investigation further documented it appeared that R41 had bumped her remote to the recliner which caused her to incline, and staff were educated to ensure that the remote was placed on her bedside table to prevent R41 from accidently activating it and Dycem was applied to the recliner cushion to prevent sliding.
The Fall Investigation, dated 08/05/23 at 09:31 PM, documented a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) transferred R41 from her bed to her wheelchair and let go of the gait belt to move the wheelchair to behind R41, which R41 lost her balance and fell. The staff were educated on proper transfer technique.
The Fall Investigation, dated 10/22/23 at 04:30 AM, documented R41 fell next to her bed, was incontinent of urine and had attempted to take herself to the bathroom. The investigation further documented staff were educated on the proper placement of the call light so that they know when R41 was attempting to get up out of bed and educated to offer/assist to use the bathroom throughout the night at least three times to ensure they were meeting her needs.
R41's EMR lacked evidence staff assessed R41 for the ability to safely use the lift chair.
On 10/26/23 at 08:18 AM, observation revealed CNA O and CNA M placed a gait belt around R41's waist, stood her, and transferred her into her wheelchair.
On 10/30/23 at 08:35 AM, observation revealed R41 in bed. The bed was lowered to the floor, and there was not Dycem in R41's recliner.
On 10/26/23 AT 08:30 AM, CNA M stated R41 was impulsive and tried to get out of bed alone so they must make frequent checks on her and keep her bed low when she was in it.
On 10/25/23 at 10:30 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN)LN H stated R41 liked to stay in bed a lot, so staff watch her carefully as she likes to try to get up on her own and then falls.
On 10/30/23 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Staff D stated the staff were starting to complete lift chair assessments on residents and that staff should use proper technique to transfer residents. Administrative Staff D further stated if a resident was on therapy, the therapy department oversaw making sure the walkers were in good working order, otherwise maintenance took care of wheelchairs but was unsure about walkers.
The facility's Falls policy, dated 10/12/22, documented residents would be identified for risk of falls and interventions implemented to reduce the risk. The staff follow the Fall Guidelines for fall occurrences, document assessment of the resident, and investigate, review fall intervention reference sheet, and notify the responsible party, physician, and nurse supervisor. The residents with falls would be discussed weekly in risk management meetings to determine, if possible, interventions to prevent future falls.
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for R41. This placed the resident at risk for further falls and injury.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview,...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 1 with sanitary indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) care which placed the resident at risk for urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system).
Findings included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting right dominant side, facial weakness, spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), bacteriuria (presence of bacteria in the blood), pyuria (excess of white blood cells or pus in urine), retention of urine, dysfunction of bladder, cystocele (when the bladder bulges into the vagina), rectocele (tissue wall which separates the rectum from the vagina is weakened and leads to the vaginal wall to bulge), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), and an unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel.
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 had severe cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximum assistance with eating, upper and lower body dressing, and rolling left to right. R1 was dependent on toileting hygiene, bathing, putting on/taking off footwear, personal hygiene, lying to sitting on side of bed, chair/bed to chair transfers, and toilet transfers. The MDS further documented R1 had an indwelling, received pain and antidepressant medications (class of medications used to treat mood disorders). R1 was at risk for developing pressure ulcer injury, had one unstageable deep tissue injury, and a pressure reducing device for bed and chair.
The Activity of Daily Living Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/24/23, documented R1 had been admitted to the facility following a hospitalization for a stroke. R1 admitted with an indwelling catheter to dependent drainage due to diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system) of the bladder and had a history of urinary tract infections, started on medicated cream due to hemorrhoids (varicosity in the lower rectum or anus caused by congestion in the veins).
R1's Care Plan, dated 09/27/23, documented R1 had a UTI and history of chronic UTI. The care plan directed staff to observe R1 for signs and symptoms of infection and to notify the physician to obtain treatment as needed. The care plan further directed staff to encourage adequate fluids, obtain lab and other diagnostic test per physician order; when R1 took antibiotics, staff would monitor for signs of allergic reaction.
The Physician Order dated 09/11/23, directed staff to provide catheter care per facility policy, change the drainage bag every two weeks.
The Physician Order dated 09/25/23 directed staff to use U-Pack Thera wipe vaginal wipes, one wipe twice a day.
The Interdisciplinary Note (IDT) dated 09/28/23 at 01:46 PM, documented a care conference was held that day with family attendance. The note recorded R1 continued rehabilitation status, worked with therapy, required a mechanical lift for transfers and staff assistance with mobility, was incontinent of bowels and did not let staff know when she needed to go to the bathroom. The IDT note further documented R1 had an indwelling catheter to dependent drainage which staff maintained.
The IDT Note dated 10/13/23 at 05:11 PM, documented R1 had to have her catheter changed as it was pulled out. The catheter size was a 16 French (Fr) catheter with a 30 cubic centimeter (cc) bulb, and the family had requested not to have pants put on the resident.
The IDT Note dated 10/19/23 at 10:19 AM, documented a call was placed to the physician to report R1 had a urine chemistry strip which was positive for leukocytes (cells that circulate in the body to fight infections)/nitrates (predictor of infection) and trace blood.
The IDT Note dated 10/24/23 at 11:01 AM, documented an order was received to collect a urinary analysis.
The Physician Order, dated 10/26/23, directed staff to administer amoxicillin (antibiotic) 250 milligrams (mg) three times a day for seven days for UTI.
On 10/26/23 at 08:00 AM observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S assisted R1 to turn to her side for morning hygiene care for the breakfast meal. R1 had soft bowel movement which took a significant amount of cleansing due to the dryness of old fecal material around the edges. Once the area had been cleansed, observation further revealed an open area to R1's coccyx area. Ongoing observation revealed CMA S provided medicated cream to the rectal area, then obtained a Thera Wipe and cleanse the catheter insertion site and tubing without changing gloves. Administrative Nurse F verified staff should had changed gloves after the resident had been cleaned from bowel movement, and another glove change before handling the Thera Wipe to cleanse the catheter site.
On 10/30/23 at 12:57 PM Administrative Nurse D verified R1 had a history of UTI's and said staff should not use the same pair of gloves to clean the resident, provide treatment, and preform catheter care.
The facility's Catheter Care-Urinary Foley policy, dated 10/08/21, documented catheter care is performed appropriately by qualified nursing staff to prevent complications caused by the presence of an indwelling catheter.
The facility failed to provide R1 with sanitary indwelling catheter care which placed the resident at risk for ongoing complications of UTIs.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview,...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 38's physician ordered fluid restriction. This placed R38 at risk of complication related to hydration status due to the need of dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) treatment and history of urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system).
Findings included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnosis of acute kidney failure, end stage renal failure (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in the kidney that causes swelling), multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), history of UTI's, bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood), acidosis (excess acid in the body fluids), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS- abnormally increased motility of the small and large intestines), history of venous thrombosis (clot that developed within a blood vessel) and embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the blood stream), and abdominal pain.
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R38 had intact cognition, was independent with eating, required partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing self, upper and lower body dressing, to roll left to right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair/bed transfer, toilet transfers.
The Activity of Daily Living Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/19/23, documented R38 went to dialysis three times a week and family member transported the resident.
The Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/19/23, documented R38 received a therapeutic renal diet with a 1500 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction; R38 received hemodialysis three times a week which would cause weight fluctuation.
R38's Care Plan, dated 09/28/23, documented R38 went to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. The care plan directed staff to monitor shunt thrill (a fine vibration felt which reflects the blood flow by a dialysis resident's shunt) and bruit (blowing or swishing sound heard when blood flows through a shunt) every shift and report concerns to dialysis; educate resident and family to any restrictions related to dialysis such as diet/fluids and continue a 1500 ml fluid restriction. The care plan lacked direction to staff as to dietary and nursing department specification on which department coordination of fluid intake.
The Physician Order dated 09/22/23, directed staff to provide a regular diet and 1500 ml fluid restriction for 24 hours.
R38's EMR lacked evidence staff monitored and recorded fluid intake until 10/09/23. R38's EMR further lacked documentation of fluid intake for the day shift of two out of 14 opportunities, evening shift lacked documentation of eight of 14 opportunities, and night shift lacked 11 opportunities of 14 opportunities.
On 10/26/23 at 11:11 AM, observation revealed R38 sat in her recliner with a family member present. R38 was alert, watched TV with her feet elevated and covered with a blanket. R38 reported she took paperwork with her to the dialysis center on treatment days and returned with the paper which she gave to staff. R38 verified the facility had not weighed her consistently before or after dialysis treatment but stated the dialysis center did weight her. R38 reported she had a 1500 ml in 24-hour fluid restriction and had to ask for fluids. R38 stated she expected nursing staff were monitoring the amounts she consumed.
On 10/26/23 at 12:52 PM, Consultant GG stated the nursing staff provided the resident fluid and tracked the fluid intake. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O stated she was instructed to provide R38 a medium glass of fluids with meals, which consisted of 360 ml.
On 10/30/23 at 09:37 AM CNA P reported R38 was on a fluid restriction but did not know the amount of the restriction.
On 10/30/23 at 09:48 AM LN J reported R38 received dialysis treatments three times a week and verified R38 had a physician order for a 1500 ml fluid restriction. LN J reported an intake and output record was kept in the resident's room so staff could record the intakes, and it was the nurse's responsibility to keep track of this information. LN J verified lack of documented fluid intakes, weights, and completion of the Dialysis Communication Form.
On 10/30/23 at 12:57 PM Administrative Staff D stated the Dialysis Communication Form should be completed and accessible for staff to review in the EMR or left on the unit for the nursing staff if they should need to review information collected. Administrative Nurse D verified she expected nursing staff to complete the communication form before and after treatment, weight, take vital signs and monitor R38's fluid intake.
The facility's Hydration/Fluid Maintenance policy, dated 09/17/21, documented to identify residents admitted to the community with risk factors which can lead to dehydration. Determine through assessment of clinical conditions if sufficient fluid intake is being offered to the resident. Develop an appropriate preventative plan of care. Risk factures for the resident becoming dehydrated are fluid loss and increased fluid needs, fluid restriction secondary to renal dialysis, functional impairments, residents who forgets to drink or forgets how to drink, and refusal of fluids. The general procedure of using daily fluid need guidelines, determine if resident needs input monitoring, perform MDS/CAA process and develop plan of care, incorporate hydration plan based on the needs of the resident.
The facility failed to monitor physician ordered fluid restriction for R38's who received dialysis treatments and had UTI history, which placed the resident at risk for complications related to hydration status.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview,...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 38 received care and services for dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) consistent with professional standards of practice which included ongoing assessments of resident's condition, and ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. This placed R38 at risk complications and unmet care needs related to dialysis treatments.
Findings Included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 documented diagnosis of acute kidney failure, end stage renal failure (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys), hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in the kidney that causes swelling), multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), history of urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood), acidosis (excess acid in the body fluids), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS- abnormally increased motility of the small and large intestines), history of venous thrombosis (clot that developed within a blood vessel) and embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the blood stream), and abdominal pain.
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R38 had intact cognition, was independent with eating, required partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing self, upper and lower body dressing, to roll left to right, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair/bed transfer, toilet transfers.
The Activity of Daily Living Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/19/23, documented R38 went to dialysis three times a week and family member transported the resident.
The Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/19/23, documented R38 received a therapeutic renal diet with a 1500 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction; R38 received hemodialysis three times a week which would cause weight fluctuation.
R38's Care Plan, dated 09/28/23, documented R38 went to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. The care plan directed staff to monitor shunt thrill (a fine vibration felt which reflects the blood flow by a dialysis resident's shunt) and bruit (blowing or swishing sound heard when blood flows through a shunt) every shift and report concerns to dialysis; educate resident and family to any restrictions related to dialysis such as diet/fluids and continue a 1500 ml fluid restriction. The care plan further directed staff to weigh R38 before and after dialysis treatment.
The Physician Order dated 09/22/23, directed staff to provide a regular diet and 1500 ml fluid restriction for 24 hours.
R38's EMR lacked evidence staff monitored and recorded fluid intake until 10/09/23. R38's EMR further lacked documentation of fluid intake for the day shift for two out of 14 opportunities, evening shift lacked documentation for eight of 14 opportunities, and night shift lacked 11 opportunities of 14 opportunities.
R38's EMR revealed the facility failed to weigh R38 before and after dialysis treatment three times out of six times opportunities for the month of September 2023 and five times out of 11 opportunities for the month of October 2023.
The facility Hemodialysis Communication Form consisted of report to hemodialysis from skilled nursing facility (SNF), report from hemodialysis to SNF, and post hemodialysis assessment after return to SNF. This communication tool information related to the resident's orientation, vital signs, weight, changes of access site, dressings, medications given before hemodialysis, special needs of the resident, and copies of lab values since last treatment.
R38's EMR lacked accessibility of the communication tool between the facility and dialysis provider.
On 10/26/23 at 11:11 AM, observation revealed R38 sat in her recliner with a family member present. R38 was alert, watched TV with her feet elevated and covered with a blanket. R38 reported she took paperwork with her to the dialysis center on treatment days and returned with the paper which she gave to staff. R38 verified the facility had not weighed her consistently before or after dialysis treatment but stated the dialysis center did weight her. R38 reported she had a 1500 ml in 24-hour fluid restriction and had to ask for fluids. R38 stated she expected nursing staff were monitoring the amounts she consumed.
On 10/26/23 at 12:52 PM, Consultant GG stated the nursing staff provided the resident fluid and tracked the fluid intake. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O stated she was instructed to provide R38 a medium glass of fluids with meals, which consisted of 360 ml.
On 10/26/23 at 02:19 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I reported the Hemodialysis Communication Forms were scanned into the EMR and not kept on the unit, but after checking with medical record staff, LN I noted the communication forms were kept in overflow file for the resident in the medical records office and were not accessible in the resident's record
On 10/30/23 at 09:37 AM CNA P reported R38 was on a fluid restriction but did not know the amount of the restriction.
On 10/30/23 at 09:48 AM LN J reported R38 received dialysis treatments three times a week and the nursing staff sent a physician visit form and the Dialysis Communication Form with the resident for each visit. LN J verified R38 should have vital signs and weight before and after dialysis treatment and had physician order for a 1500 ml fluid restriction. LN J reported an intake and output record was kept in the resident's room so staff could record the intakes, and it was the nurse's responsibility to keep track of this information. LN J verified the lack of documented fluid intakes, weights, and completion of the Dialysis Communication Form. LN J stated the Dialysis Communication Form was given to medical records to be scanned into the EMR. LN J was unable to find the placement of the scanned forms in the EMR.
On 10/30/23 at 09:50 AM, LN K verified the Dialysis Communication Form for R38 was kept in medical record overflow and had not been scanned into the EMR.
On 10/30/23 at 12:57 PM Administrative Staff D stated the Dialysis Communication Form should be completed and accessible for staff to review in the EMR or left on the unit for the nursing staff if they should need to review information collected. Administrative Nurse D verified she expected nursing staff to complete the communication form before and after treatment, weight, take vital signs and monitor R38's fluid intake.
The facility's Dialysis-Coordination of Care policy dated 11/2025, documented it was the responsibility if the community for delivery of care and services to the resident before transferring o the dialysis cent and after the resident received dialysis and transferred back to the community. Development of a care plan consistent with the resident's specific conditions, risks, needs, behaviors and preferences and current standards of practice, to include measurable objectives and timetables and specific interventions related to the dialysis services and the renal disease. The following need to be considered in development of the care plan: special nutritional and fluid needs, risks for adverse medication effects, care of the access site, infection control measures, skin care measures, monitoring of vital signs, weights and other monitoring requirements such as before and after dialysis treatments, special instructions for administering medications, especially before receiving dialysis treatments, dialysis center instructions, support and assistive devices/equipment , instruction related to potential emergency intervention, alternative if resident should refuse dialysis services. Coordination communication between dialysis center and community by completing Hemodialysis Communication Form for each dialysis visit.
The facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice which included on going assessment of condition, communication, and collaboration with the dialysis treatment, which placed R38 at risk for complications and unmet care needs related to dialysis treatment.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview,...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of an appropriate indication for Resident (R)26's Zyprexa (antipsychotic-class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) placing the resident at risk for unnecessary medications and adverse side effects.
Findings included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and falls.
R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R26 had long and short-term memory problems and moderately impaired decision-making skills. R26 required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene; R26 required limited assistance of one staff for toileting and did not ambulate. The MDS further documented R26 had no behaviors and received antipsychotic, antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people), and antidepressant (class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medication on a routine basis.
R26's Care Plan, dated 10/19/23, initiated 07/35/34, directed staff to ensure R26 had items that brought her comfort, have family involved in her plan of care, administer medications for her mood and anxiety, and monitor her behaviors. The update, dated 09/07/23, documented R26 took psychotropic medication and to monitor for side effects.
The Physician Order, dated 07/27/23, directed staff to administer Zyprexa, 5 milligrams (mg), at bedtime. The order was changed on 08/08/23 to administer the Zyprexa, 5 mg, twice per day for the diagnosis of psychological and behavioral factors associated with disorders or diseases classified elsewhere.
The Pharmacist Review's, dated 07/26/23, 08/28/23, 09/24/23, documented the pharmacist had no recommendations.
The Pharmacist Review, dated 10/26/23 during the onsite survey, documented the diagnosis of psychological and behavioral factors associated with disorders or diseases classified elsewhere for the Zyprexa medication and recommended a detailed statement from the physician noting that the benefit outweighed the risk.
On 10/25/23 at 08:09 AM, observation revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R administered R26's medications, including the Zyprexa, without concern. CMA R stated R26 did not have any behaviors.
On 10/30/23 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated R26 did not have an appropriate indication for the use of Zyprexa and said the CP should notified the facility earlier regarding the inappropriate diagnosis.
The facility's Psychoactive Psychopharmacological Medications policy, dated 06/10/19, documented psychoactive medications would not be used for discipline or for convenience and would not be used unless necessary to treat medical symptoms. For any of these types of medications, gradual dose reductions and behavioral interventions will be done per physician orders, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue the medication or to reach the lowest effective does. A drug regimen review was conducted monthly for drug irregularities, discrepancies, or non-compliance with regulatory guidelines are brought to the attention of the director of nursing, medical director, and attending physician.
The facility failed to ensure the CP identified and reported the lack of an appropriate diagnosis indication for R26's Zyprexa, placing the resident at risk for unnecessary medications and adverse side effects.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Bas...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R)26, who had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications.
Findings included:
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance and falls.
R26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R26 had long and short-term memory problems and moderately impaired decision-making skills. R26 required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene; R26 required limited assistance of one staff for toileting and did not ambulate. The MDS further documented R26 had no behaviors and received antipsychotic, antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people), and antidepressant (class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medication on a routine basis.
R26's Care Plan, dated 10/19/23, initiated 07/35/34, directed staff to ensure R26 had items that brought her comfort, have family involved in her plan of care, administer medications for her mood and anxiety, and monitor her behaviors. The update, dated 09/07/23, documented R26 took psychotropic medication and to monitor for side effects.
The Physician Order, dated 07/27/23, directed staff to administer Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication), 5 milligrams (mg), at bedtime. The order was changed on 08/08/23 to administer the Zyprexa, 5 mg, twice per day for the diagnosis of psychological and behavioral factors associated with disorders or diseases classified elsewhere.
R26's EMR lacked evidence of a documented physician rational which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for ongoing Zyprexa use.
On 10/25/23 at 08:09 AM, observation revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R administered R26's medications, including the Zyprexa, without concern. CMA R stated R26 did not have any behaviors.
On 10/30/23 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated R26 did not have an appropriate indication for the use of Zyprexa.
The facility's Psychoactive Psychopharmacological Medications policy, dated 06/10/19, documented psychoactive medications would not be used for discipline or for convenience and would not be used unless necessary to treat medical symptoms. For any of these types of medications, gradual dose reductions and behavioral interventions will be done per physician orders, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue the medication or to reach the lowest effective does. A drug regimen review was conducted monthly for drug irregularities, discrepancies, or non-compliance with regulatory guidelines are brought to the attention of the director of nursing, medical director, and attending physician.
The facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication or the required physician documentation for the continued use of R26's Zyprexa, placing the resident at risk for unnecessary adverse side effects.
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 resident. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 resident. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff had appropriate competencies and skill set to provide nursing related services to assure resident safety and to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This placed Resident (R) 40 at risk of injury during transfers and ongoing wound assessments and all residents at risk for decreased quality of care.
Findings included:
- The Facility Assessment dated 08/25/23, documented the Interdisciplinary Team assessment was made considering the team members skill sets in regard to residents' acuity. Equipment along with specific staff education will be provided to meet a resident's need. Involvement of the Medical Director will be in place regarding the admission/continuing care assessment and discussion.
On 10/30/23 at 11:05 AM, Administrative Nurse D provided three nursing staff competencies. One of the three did not have the competencies required. Administrative Nurse D reported the facility recognized this issue in 05/2023 and developed a form to complete the required task in 06/2023 but had not yet completed competencies for all the nursing staff.
The facility's Staff Competency policy, dated 10/11/21, documented all staff will receive education and training applicable to their position and job description. Check lists, Relias courses and competency testing will be used to ensure staff are appropriately trained for position.
The facility failed to ensure licensed staff had appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This placed all residents at risk for decreased quality of care.
- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R40 documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), weakness, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), other symptoms and signs with cognitive functions and awareness.
The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R40 had intact cognition and required supervision and one staff assistance for transfers, ambulation, dressing, and toileting. The MDS further documented R40 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no skin issues.
The Significant MDS, dated 08/08/23, documented R40 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, extensive assistance of one staff for dressing, ambulation in room, and personal hygiene. The MDS further documented R40 had unsteady balance, no functional impairment, and had no skin issues.
R40's Care Plan dated 10/09/23, initiated on 06/06/23, directed staff to assist R40 with set up assistance with transferring, repositioning, toileting, and ambulation.
The Fall Investigation, dated 10/19/23 at 12:25 AM, documented upon entering R40's bathroom, he was observed on the floor with his back towards the toiled seat. R40 stated a spider ran across his foot and he tried to get up and kill it, lost his balance, and fell, The staff assisted R40 off the floor, assessed him for injury, and transferred him into his recliner. The investigation documented staff were educated to offer/assist resident to use the bathroom between 12:00 AM and 4:00 AM, and a work order was placed to have resident's room checked for any spiders.
The Skin Evaluation Record, dated 10/19/23 at 12:54 PM, documented a skin tear to R40's mid back which measured six centimeters (cm) x 2.5 cm and noted a treatment to cleanse the skin tear with normal saline or wound cleanser, pat dry, apply triple antibiotic ointment (TAO) if needed, cover with a dressing, and monitor skin every shift for infection until healed.
On 10/26/23 at 12:54 PM, observation revealed a large skin tear in the middle of R40's back. The dressing came off and drainage from the wound seeped onto the back of R40's shirt. Further observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) G washed her hands, donned clean gloves, took gauze and cleansed the wound with normal saline, changed her gloves and placed a foam dressing on the wound. LN G stated she was the nurse that found the skin tear on the resident's back. LN G stated she thought R40 sustained the skin tear as a result of staff's use of a gait belt when staff transferred R40. LN G stated she planned to contact R40's physician to get the TAO discontinued as it was causing the skin tear to be too moist and delay healing.
On 10/26/23 at 01:00 PM, Administrative Nurse F stated the skin tear happened after R40 fell. Three staff members used a gait belt to get R40 off the floor. The nurse on duty at the time did not see the wound as it did not bleed, and she had already completed a skin assessment prior to getting R40 off the floor. Administrative Nurse F further stated education was provided with all three staff on proper gait belt use after the incident, and to make sure the gait belt was secured properly, not too tight but not too lose as where it may move and cause injury. Administrative Nurse F said a heavy-duty gait belt with side handles had been ordered to use for R40's transfers.
On 10/30/23 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she had ordered a different gait belt for R40, and it would be more appropriate to use when he falls. Administrative Nurse D verified she had not visualized the wound to R40's back from the gait belt.
The facility's Lifting and transferring resident policy, dated 10/25/23, documented, the facility would provide a safe work environment for resident care areas by providing and requiring the use of safety materials, equipment, and training designated to prevent injury. Nurse's assess and determine lifting and transfer requirements and the procedure used for each resident, all residents must be lifted or transferred according to the determined procedure.
The facility failed to ensure staff possessed the required skill and knowledge to safely apply and use a gait belt for an assisted transfer. As a result, R40 sustained a large skin tear on his back. This also placed the resident at risk for further injuries or complications related to improper transfers and/or use of gait belt.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 57 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavo...
Read full inspector narrative →
The facility had a census of 57 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance, when dietary staff failed to follow a recipe while preparing four residents' pureed diets. This placed the affected residents at risk for impaired nutrition.
Findings included:
- On 10/25/23 at 10:15 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB, with Dietary Manager (DM) DD overlooking, stated the facility had four residents with pureed diets, and one received double portions. DS BB placed five square pieces of lasagna in a blender container, blended to a consistency of pudding, then placed unmeasured portions of lasgna onto four divided plates using a spatula. Observation revealed DS BB took the blender container and lid to the three-sink area, rinsed the blender, and placed the blender and lid through each section of the sink. DS BB returned to the prep table, placed unmeasured cubes of cooked carrots into the blender, blended to consistency of pudding, and placed onto the divided plate in a different section then lasagna. DS BB then used the same procedure to wash the blender and lid. DS BB placed a bread stick into the blender, added unmeasured amount of chicken broth, blended to consistency of pudding, and placed onto one of the divided plates; DS BB continued with the same procedure for the next four bread sticks.
On 10/25/23 at 10:45AM, DS BB verified she had not followed a recipe and stated she was taught to go by the food consistency.
On 10/25/23 at 11:15 AM, DS DD stated staff should follow a recipe when preparing residents pureed diet.
The facility's Dysphagia (swallowing difficulty) and Puree (cooked food that is a smooth, creamy substance or thick liquid suspension) Creations Policy, undated, documented each employee associated with dietary, nursing and auxiliary staff needs to understand methods to improve the quality of life to which each resident was entitled, especially the resident with dysphagia. Producing sensory-appealing entrees can yield positive outcomes, such as improved quality of life, increased meal satisfaction and improved health status, for the resident with dysphagia.
The facility kitchen staff failed to follow a recipe when preparing four residents' pureed diet. This placed the affected residents at risk for impaired nutrition.
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional stan...
Read full inspector narrative →
The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff used contaminated gloves to transfer food items from one container to another while preparing the four residents pureed diets, failed to use gloves when cutting and handling food items, and failed to ensure clean and sanitary food prep areas. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness.
Findings included:
- On 10/25/.23 at 10:15 AM, observation revealed, during preparation of the pureed diets, Dietary Staff (DS) BB washed hands, applied gloves, then touched the food prep counter (with food particles and clear liquid on it). DS BB then used her contaminated gloved right hand to transfer cooked, cubed carrots from a container to the blender container. Further observation revealed DS BB, with the same contaminated gloves, retrieved a four ounce scoop from the hanging utensil device, and placed it on the same food prep counter. After pureeing the carrots, DS BB picked up the scoop from the counter and used it to place the carrots onto four divided plates. Further observation revealed DS BB retrieved a spatula from a kitchen drawer, with the same contaminated gloves, placed it on the same contaminated food prep table, and used it to transfer pureed bread sticks, one at a time onto the four divided plates. Further observation revealed DS CC, working at the food prep table across from DS BB, handled and sliced ham with ungloved hands, then touched the counter, retrieved onions and sliced the onions with his contaminated ungloved hands.
On 10/25/23 at 10:30 AM, DS BB verified the above observation regarding her actions and stated she should not have used her gloved hand to transfer food items from one container to another and probably should place the spatula and scoop on a plate.
On 10/25/23 at 11:15 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) DD stated staff should not transfer food items with their gloved hands, they should use a utensil and should not place utensils on the counter should place them on a plate. DM DD verified DS CC touched the ham and onions with ungloved hands and stated DS CC should have used gloves.
The facility's Use of Gloves Policy, revised 09/23, documented gloves must be worn when touching ready-to eat foods that would not be heated or processed further. Gloves should be changed when they become soiled or torn, when changing from one task to another, or after two hours of continuous use.
The facility's Food Handling Principles Policy, revised 09/23, documented employees would be trained in safe food service techniques and personal hygiene on an annual basis or more often as needed.
The facility kitchen staff failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This placed the 57 residents who received their meals from the facility kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.
- On 10/25/23 at 10:30AM observation in the kitchen revealed the following:
The wall behind the back of the oven hood had numerous different size streaks of brown substance running below.
The oven hood front had brown substance, approximately two feet (ft) by 12 inches (in), located above the deep fat fryer.
The seam between the back of the oven hood had approximately six ft with missing caulk.
The sugar, flour, breadcrumbs, and oatmeal bins had numerous areas of different size blackish gray substance all around the outside of them.
The trash cans had numerous areas of different size blackish gray substance on the outside of them.
The two deep fat fryers had numerous different size streaks of blackish brown substance on the sides of them.
The black counter toaster had numerous dried food particles on the top of it.
On 10/25/23 at 11:00 am, DM DD verified the above findings and stated the dietary department had been short staffed and he had worked four 12- hour days in a row so staff had not cleaned the kitchen.
The facility's Cleaning and Sanitizing of Work Surfaces Policy, revised 09/23, documented a cleaning schedule is completed and posted to ensure routine cleaning was completed weekly. Larger pieces of equipment and area are scheduled on a biweekly and monthly basis.
The facility kitchen staff failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This placed the 57 residents who received their food from the facility kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee that met quarterly and had the required membership in attendance when the Medical Director (or designee) did not attend one quarterly meeting. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care.
Findings included:
- The facility provided the signed QAA Committee attendance roster for 10/26/22, 01/18/23, 04/19/23, and 07/26/23.
Review of the 01/18/23 roster revealed the Medical Director (or designee) did not attend.
On 10/30/23 at 03:10 PM, Administrative Nurse F verified the Medical Director had not been present for the QAA meeting.
The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Plan policy, dated 09/01/23, documented the Administration of [NAME] Presbyterian Manor develops and leads our program with input from staff at all levels, family members, community members and resident's themselves. It was formed a QAPI Steering Committee that meets quarterly composed of leaders from administration, leaders from the various service areas, Medical Director and Consultants.
The facility failed to maintain a QAA Committee that met quarterly and had the required membership in attendance. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care.