SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Smith Center Health and Rehab has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and in the middle of the pack compared to other nursing homes. It ranks #156 out of 295 facilities in Kansas, placing it in the bottom half, and is the second option in Smith County, indicating limited local choices. Unfortunately, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 3 in 2023 to 8 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, rated at 4 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 27%, significantly lower than the state average, which suggests staff are stable and familiar with residents. However, the facility has incurred fines totaling $16,153, which is concerning as it indicates potential compliance problems. Additionally, more registered nurse coverage than 83% of Kansas facilities is a positive aspect, ensuring better oversight of resident care. Specific incidents include a resident suffering a fractured neck due to improper use of a lift during transfer and the lack of a full-time Certified Dietary Manager, which raises concerns about nutritional care. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and RN coverage, the increase in reported issues and critical incidents highlights the need for careful consideration.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Kansas
- #156/295
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below Kansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $16,153 in fines. Lower than most Kansas facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 51 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kansas. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Low Staff Turnover (27%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (27%)
21 points below Kansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Kansas average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with three residents reviewed for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five residents reviewed for immunizations, Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time Certified Di...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** - On 04/14/25 at 12:00 PM, during dining observation revealed the following:
Two overhead fluorescent light fixtures, with two l...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 37 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll Based Journaling...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility identified a census of 35 residents with three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, observatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and administer medications in a safe manne...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional stand...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the number of nursing (licensed and unlic...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for change of condition. Based on...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with pro...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below Kansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $16,153 in fines. Above average for Kansas. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade C (54/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Smith Center Health And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Kansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Smith Center Health And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 27%, compared to the Kansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Smith Center Health And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 11 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Smith Center Health And Rehab?
SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 45 certified beds and approximately 38 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SMITH CENTER, Kansas.
How Does Smith Center Health And Rehab Compare to Other Kansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kansas, SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (27%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Smith Center Health And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Smith Center Health And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Smith Center Health And Rehab Stick Around?
Staff at SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 27%, the facility is 19 percentage points below the Kansas average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Smith Center Health And Rehab Ever Fined?
SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB has been fined $16,153 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Kansas average of $33,240. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Smith Center Health And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
SMITH CENTER HEALTH AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.