SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for accidents/falls. Based on ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for accidents/falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to use an appropriate lift sling during a mechanical lift transfer, which resulted in Resident (R) 6 falling out of a lift sling resulting in a head laceration, hematoma (collection of blood under the skin from an injury), and pain. The facility further failed to implement new interventions to prevent further falls for R14, who had multiple falls. This placed the residents at risk for further falls and fall-related injury.
Findings included:
- R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle or old age, due to generalized degeneration of the brain), osteoporosis (medical condition in which the bones become brittle and fragile from loss of tissue), osteoarthritis (degeneration of joint cartilage and the underlying bone), spinal stenosis (when the spaces in the spine narrow and create pressure on the spinal cord and nerve roots), anxiety disorder (characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), glaucoma (group of eye conditions that can cause blindness), and major depressive disorder (MDD-mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life).
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R6 had long term memory problems with severely impaired decision making, one non-injury fall, one minor injury fall, and weight of 159 pounds.
The Fall Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/19/22, documented R6 recently admitted on hospice services. Her balance was unsteady; she was only able to stabilize with staff assistance, and she used a wheelchair for mobility. The CAA documented an 08/29/22 Health Status Note documented staff found the resident on the floor with a large bump to the left side of her forehead.
The Quarterly MDS, dated 11/07/22, documented R6 had short- and long-term memory loss, with severely impaired decision making. The MDS documented R6 required limited assistance of one staff for eating, extensive assistance of two staff for toileting, hygiene, dressing, bed mobility, and total assistance of two staff for transfers. The MDS documented R6 had no range of motion impairment, she used a wheelchair, and had one minor injury fall. The MDS lacked a weight, pain assessment, and balance testing.
The Fall Care Plan, dated 08/12/22, documented staff moved R6 closer to the nurse's station after the 08/29/22 fall. Other fall interventions included remind her to not pick up her room tray and to ask for assistance with this and placed a motion sensor in the resident's room. Staff would ensure the resident's call light was within reach and staff would encourage her to use it for assistance as needed. Staff would know R6 might need reminders that she had a call light and education on how to use it. Staff would ensure her walker was at bedside when going to bed.
The ADL Care Plan, dated 11/11/22, directed staff to provide total assistance of two staff for transfers with the full mechanical lift and large combi sling. The 09/27/22 care plan update directed staff as follows: Do NOT use a hygiene sling (designed specifically for toileting and allows the user to have easy access to the perineal area) for transfers.
Fall risk assessments of 2022 were completed for R6 quarterly and after each subsequent fall and documented R6 at high risk for falls.
The Fall Note, dated 08/29/22 at 11:31 AM, documented staff notified the nurse the resident was on the floor, and upon assessment the nurse found a large bump to the left side of R6's forehead. The note documented the nurse notified the physician who instructed her to send the resident to the emergency department (ED) due to her condition.
The Progress Note, dated 08/29/22 at 07:24 PM, documented R6 sustained an abrasion the length of her nose and bruising above her left eye. A motion detector was set up in the resident's room.
The Transfer Data Collection, dated 09/14/22, documented the resident may require a full mechanical lift at times. The care plan lacked an update regarding this information.
The Fall Note, dated 09/24/22 at 09:34 AM, documented at 08:35 AM, a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) called the nurse to the resident's room where he found R6 on her back on the floor in front of the mechanical lift. The nurse documented staff stated R6 slipped out the bottom of the lift sling. R6 was bleeding from the back of her head with a 2 centimeter (cm) laceration noted to the lower left side of her head and a hematoma. The nurse assessed R6, applied a pressure dressing to stop the bleeding, and notified an on-call physician. The physician instructed staff to keep a pressure dressing on the resident, monitor for continued head bleeding, monitor for any change in cognition, and to monitor for any signs of further injury. The note documented the resident reported head pain and staff offered an ice pack, which the resident declined. The nurse changed the pressure dressing and noted some blood on the gauze pad. Neurological checks were within normal limits for the resident.
The Fall Investigation, dated 10/04/22, documented staff attempted to transfer the resident with the Hoyer (total/mechanical) lift and did not use the correct sling. As a result, the resident fell through the bottom of the sling and hit her head on the lift and her right hip on the floor. The investigation stated all hygiene slings were removed until the facility provided staff education. The facility reported the incident to the state agency.
The Staff Education Meeting, dated 10/13/22, covered use of lift and slings.
On 12/28/22 at 11:07 AM, observation revealed CNA M and CNA N, with Licensed Nurse (LN) G in the resident's room, providing incontinence care. R6 anxiously stated my baby, where's my baby. When LN G asked R6 if she was in pain, R6 replied she was in pain but did not know where. The staff used the total mechanical lift with a medium sling to transfer R6 from her bed to her wheelchair.
On 12/28/22 at 11:08 AM, LN G stated the facility had two full body lifts and 2-3 residents on each side who used them. She stated the facility had two medium slings, two large slings, and three extra slings in the offices.
On 12/29/22 at 11:22 AM, CNA M stated on 09/24/22 the resident hollered out and when they wanted to transfer R6 to her wheelchair, they could not find the total lift sling. They found the night shift had put it in the soiled laundry and it needed washed. CNA M stated he looked on the other side of the facility for a total lift sling but could not find a clean one. CNA M stated when they put the hygiene sling under her and lifted her off the bed it was ok, but when they moved R6, she swung a little and dropped through the bottom of the sling onto the floor. He stated R6 used to use a walker before the previous fall, but now used a total lift for transfers.
On 01/04/23 at 08:43 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated when a sling became soiled staff were to place it in the laundry and there were spare slings on the units. Administrative Nurse D said in order to use a hygiene sling, the resident should be capable of holding arms down to side and be cognitive. Staff used a large hygiene sling and should not have used the hygiene sling with R6. Administrative Nurse D stated she provided all nursing staff education on lift use.
The facility's Using a Mechanical Lift policy, dated July 2017, documented at least two staff are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. Staff must be trained and demonstrate competency using the specific devices used in the facility. Before using a lift device staff were to assess the resident's physical and cognitive condition, measure the resident for proper sling size and purpose, and select a sling bar appropriate for the resident's size and the task. After placing the sling under the resident, staff were to visually check the size to ensure it was not too large or too small. The policy directed staff to lift the resident two inches from the surface to check the fit of the sling and weight distribution, slowly lift the resident, and gently support the resident as he/she was moved. The policy directed staff to disinfect slings between residents, wash and sanitize according to manufacturer's instructions.
The facility failed to use an appropriate transfer lift sling during a full-body mechanical lift transfer. As a result, R6 slipped out of the sling, fell to the floor, and sustained a head laceration, a hematoma, and pain.
- R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of fracture of neck of left femur (thigh bone), cerebral aneurysm (bulge or ballooning in a blood vessel in the brain), diabetes mellitus (disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and anxiety.
The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented R14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R14 required supervision for eating and limited staff assistance for transfers, walking, toileting, dressing and hygiene. R14 had unsteady balance, used a walker or wheelchair, and had one minor injury fall since prior the MDS.
The Fall Care Plan, dated 11/4/22, directed staff to ensure sure her call light was within reach and encourage her to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needed prompt response to all requests for assistance. Staff would provide a safe environment with even floors free from spills and clutter; adequate, glare-free light; a working and reachable call light, the bed in low position at night; and personal items within reach. The 09/05/22 fall update (initiated 10/07/22) directed staff to provide a call light pendent for R14. The update for the fall 09/19/22, (initiated 9/22/22) directed staff to provide a motion alarm as R14 could not remember to call for assistance. The update after the 10/19/2022 fall (initiated 10/26/22) directed staff to provide a call light pendant (repeated from 10/07/22).
The Fall Risk Assessments from 09/01/22 to 10/27/22 all documented R14 at high risk for falls.
The Fall Note, dated 09/5/22 at 04:30 PM, documented staff heard the resident yell for help and found her on the floor just outside the bathroom door. R14 stated she was going back to bed. Bruises were noted to bilateral wrists and the back, right side of her head. The nurse notified the physician of the fall and the resident complaints of left leg/hip pain. The resident's head hurt, and she has a bruise to the back of her head. The physician ordered staff to send the resident to the hospital for evaluation.
The hospital report, dated 09/05/22, documented diagnoses of contusion (bruise) of head and left hip from fall and the X-ray of R14's left hip documented no fracture.
The re-admission from the hospital assessment, dated 09/12/22, documented R14 had a left hip fracture, and a motion alarm was in place related to resident confusion and hallucinations.
The Fall Note, dated 09/19/22 at 03:25 PM, documented staff found R14 on the floor, laying on her right side, knees slightly bent. The resident was assessed with no obvious injury noted, but complained her tailbone hurt.
The Fall Note, dated 10/19/22 at 10:30 AM, documented a dietary aide was passing menus to residents when she saw R14 attempt to sit down, but sat on the arm of the chair, lost her balance and fell to the floor. A standing floor alarm was in place and active. The resident fell onto right side of her body and hit the right side of her head. The physician ordered staff to send R14 to the emergency room as she was on blood thinners.
On 12/29/22 at 07:53 AM, observation revealed R14 in bed and a motion alarm on. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M put her shoes on, used gait belt and walker with contact assistance to assist her to the toilet. R14 took small steady steps. Observation revealed non-skid strips on the floor in front of the toilet, carpet in bedroom, and a toilet riser with hand bars.
On 01/04/23 at 08:50 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the lack of new appropriate fall prevention interventions after the 09/05/22 and 10/19/22 falls, placing R14 at risk for further falls.
The facility Fall Managing policy, dated March 2018, documented staff would identify fall interventions based on previous evaluations and current data related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent falls. If falls recurs despite initial interventions staff would implement additional or different interventions or indicate why the approach remained relevant.
The facility failed to provide relevant fall interventions to prevent further falls for R14, placing the resident at risk for falls with injury.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for hospitalization. Based on obse...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide bed hold notices for two sampled Residents (R) 1 and R30, or their representatives when the resident was sent to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R1 and R30 at risk to not be allowed to return to his/her former room at the facility.
Findings included:
- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), hypertension (high blood pressure), heart attack, and diabetes (disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine).
The 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R1 required supervision for eating and extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, dressing, mobility, toileting, and hygiene. The MDS documented R1 received scheduled pain meds, had almost constant pain, which limited her sleep and activities.
The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan, dated 12/09/22, documented R1 may not be as responsive when in pain and she has refused cares. The care plan directed staff to re-approach later. The resident required extensive assitance from one staff with showering, extensive staff assistance to turn and reposition in bed, dress, toileting, and requires a mechanical lift with two staff assistance for transfers.
The EMR documented R1 was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] to 10/27/22. The facility did not provide R1 or her representative a Notice of Bed Hold to ensure she would be permitted to return to the facility following hospitalization.
The EMR documented R1 was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] to 12/12/22. The facility did not provide R1 or her representative a Notice of Bed Hold to ensure she would be permitted to return to the facility following hospitalization.
On 12/29/22 at 08:00 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) G obtained R1's vital signs. R1 appeared drowsy and received oxygen per nasal canula at four liters per minute (L/min). Her oxygen level was below normal at 88% and LN G increased the oxygen flow to five L/min. and the resident's level climbed to 91%. LN G stated the resident had not yet decided to use hospice services and her family was coming later today to talk to her some more about it.
On 01/04/23 at 02:35 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility had not provided a Bed Hold Notice when the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and on 12/08/22.
The facility's Bed Holds and Returns policy, dated October 2022, stated all residents were provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents were to be provided written notice about these policies well in advance of any transfer and at the time of a transfer or within 24 hours.
The facility failed to provide bed hold notices for R1, or her representative, when the resident was sent to the hospital two different times, placing R1 at risk to not be allowed to return to her former room at the facility.
- R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes (disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), heart failure, heart attack, generalized anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), respiratory failure, and multiple fractures of the pelvis (large bony structure near the base of the spine to which the hind limbs or legs are attached in humans).
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R30 required supervision for eating and extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, mobility, dressing, toileting, and hygiene.
The Fall Care Plan, dated 12/08/22, documented R30 had a recent fall resulting in fractures of his pelvis and was currently unable to walk. The care plan directed staff to provide extensive assistance for toileting, transfers, ensure call light within reach and encourage him to use it for assistance.
R30's EMR documented the resident admitted to a hospital from [DATE] to 09/23/22 for respiratory failure, and pneumonia (infection of the lungs). The facility did not provide R30 or his representative a Notice of Bed Hold to ensure he would be permitted to return to the facility following hospitalization.
R30's EMR documented the resident admitted to a hospital from [DATE] to 12/02/22 after fall. The facility did not provide R30 or his representative a Notice of Bed Hold to ensure he would be permitted to return to the facility following hospitalization.
On 12/28/22 at 03:05 PM, observation revealed R30 self-propelled his wheelchair to the dining room and went to a table to visit with another resident and play dominoes.
On 01/04/23 at 02:35 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility had not provided a Bed Hold Notice when the resident discharged to the hospital 09/12/22 and on 11/29/22.
The facility's Bed Holds and Returns policy, dated October 2022, stated all residents were provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents were to be provided written notice about these policies well in advance of any transfer and at the time of a transfer or within 24 hours.
The facility failed to provide bed hold notices for R30, or his representative, when the resident was sent to the hospital two different times, placing R30 at risk to not be allowed to return to his former room at the facility.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for Resident (R) 9 after falls and development of a pressure ulcer and R14 after falls. This placed the residents at risk for uncommunicated care needs.
Findings included:
- R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), lymphedema (localized swelling of the body caused by an abnormal accumulation of lymph), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and generalized anxiety disorder (condition of excessive worry about everyday issues and situations).
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R9 required supervision for eating, extensive assistance of one staff for hygiene, and two staff with transfers, toileting, bed mobility, walking, and dressing.
The Fall Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/07/22, documented R9 had functional limited Range of Motion (ROM) to both lower extremities, and limited ROM and hand-eye coordination. R9's balance was not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance, and the resident was non-ambulatory with use of a wheelchair and a walker for mobility. The resident had recent falls and was at risk for falls and injuries.
The Fall Care Plan, dated 10/07/22, directed staff to ensure R9's call light pendant was within reach and staff would encourage him to use it for assistance as needed, and provide prompt response to all requests for assistance. The care plan directed staff to encourage R9 to wear nonskid socks at night to help keep him from sliding out of bed, and appropriate footwear when ambulating or mobilizing in his wheelchair. Staff would remind him to keep papers off of the floor, so he did not slip on them. Staff would follow facility fall protocol, keep floors free from spills or clutter, provide adequate, glare-free light, provide working and reachable call light, ensure handrails on walls, and keep personal items within reach. The care plan directed staff to keep the resident's chair with arms close to the wall so it did not get in the way when ambulating in the room. Staff would educate the resident to always keep shoes on when ambulating to prevent falls (repeat of earlier intervention). The care plan update on 09/07/2022 directed staff to provide a motion detector to alert staff for his safety. The care plan update on 09/20/22 directed staff to place a transfer poll beside his bed to help keep him steady. The care plan update on 11/04/22 (after the 10/14/22 fall) stated R9 could not be in his room alone while in his wheelchair.
The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan, dated 09/27/22, directed staff to provide assistance of one to two staff with transfers. The care plan lacked further instruction such as whether to use a gait belt, walker, wheelchair, etc.
The Fall Note, dated 03/16/22 at 02:30 PM, documented R9 stated he took his call light pendant off because he was going to change his shirt. Staff educated the resident to always use his walker in his room and wear shoes to help prevent falls. The writer noted the call light pendant around the resident's neck.
The Fall Note, dated 06/03/22 at 10:57 AM, documented staff updated the resident's care plan for orthostatic blood pressure twice a day throughout the weekend and to report to the physician on Monday if significant changes were noted.
The Fall Note, dated 09/07/22 at 03:42 AM, documented the care plan was updated to direct staff to provide stand by assistance for transfers and ambulation. It would also be updated for him to have a motion detector as he was later found to be up without calling for assistance.
The Fall Note, dated 09/14/22 at 09:50 PM, documented the nurse requested R9 (who had moderately impaired cognition) talk to his physician about what could be causing these falls.
The Fall Note, dated 10/14/22 at 0712 AM, documented and intervention to get the resident a pendant so it could always be on him (care planned prior to 03/16/22).
On 12/29/22 at 09:13 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M used the sit to stand mechanical lift to transfer R9 from his wheelchair to his recliner. The resident's care plan lacked direction regarding the use of the sit to stand mechanical lift for R9.
On 01/04/23 at 08:50 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated during a risk meeting they decided to ensure the resident had a new pendant call light as his had been lost. Administrative Nurse D verified the intervention of a pendant call light had already been care planned before and the use of a mechanical lift for transfers had not been care planned yet.
The facility Fall Managing policy, dated March 2018, documented staff would identify fall interventions based on previous evaluations and current data related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent falls. If falls recurs despite initial interventions staff would implement additional or different interventions or indicate why the approach remained relevant.
The facility failed to revise R9's care plan with relevant fall interventions to prevent further falls for R9, placing the resident at risk for continued falls or injury.
- R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of fracture of neck of left femur (thigh bone), cerebral aneurysm (bulge or ballooning in a blood vessel in the brain), diabetes mellitus (disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and anxiety.
The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented R14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R14 required supervision for eating and limited staff assistance for transfers, walking, toileting, dressing and hygiene. R14 had unsteady balance, used a walker or wheelchair, and had one minor injury fall since prior the MDS.
The Fall Care Plan, dated 11/4/22, directed staff to ensure sure her call light was within reach and encourage her to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needed prompt response to all requests for assistance. Staff would provide a safe environment with even floors free from spills and clutter; adequate, glare-free light; a working and reachable call light, the bed in low position at night; and personal items within reach. The 09/05/22 fall update (initiated 10/07/22) directed staff to provide a call light pendent for R14. The update for the fall 09/19/22, (initiated 9/22/22) directed staff to provide a motion alarm as R14 could not remember to call for assistance. The update after the 10/19/2022 fall (initiated 10/26/22) directed staff to provide a call light pendant (repeated from 10/07/22).
The Fall Risk Assessments from 09/01/22 to 10/27/22 all documented R14 at high risk for falls.
The Fall Note, dated 09/5/22 at 04:30 PM, documented staff heard the resident yell for help and found her on the floor just outside the bathroom door. R14 stated she was going back to bed. Bruises were noted to bilateral wrists and the back, right side of her head. The nurse notified the physician of the fall and the resident complaints of left leg/hip pain. The resident's head hurt, and she has a bruise to the back of her head. The physician ordered staff to send the resident to the hospital for evaluation.
The hospital report, dated 09/05/22, documented diagnoses of contusion (bruise) of head and left hip from fall and the X-ray of R14's left hip documented no fracture.
The re-admission from the hospital assessment, dated 09/12/22, documented R14 had a left hip fracture, and a motion alarm was in place related to resident confusion and hallucinations.
The Fall Note, dated 09/19/22 at 03:25 PM, documented staff found R14 on the floor, laying on her right side, knees slightly bent. The resident was assessed with no obvious injury noted, but complained her tailbone hurt.
The Fall Note, dated 10/19/22 at 10:30 AM, documented a dietary aide was passing menus to residents when she saw R14 attempt to sit down, but sat on the arm of the chair, lost her balance and fell to the floor. A standing floor alarm was in place and active. The resident fell onto right side of her body and hit the right side of her head. The physician ordered staff to send R14 to the emergency room as she was on blood thinners.
On 12/29/22 at 07:53 AM, observation revealed R14 in bed and a motion alarm on. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M put her shoes on, used gait belt and walker with contact assistance to assist her to the toilet. R14 took small steady steps. Observation revealed non-skid strips on the floor in front of the toilet, carpet in bedroom, and a toilet riser with hand bars.
On 01/04/23 at 08:50 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the lack of new appropriate fall prevention interventions after the 09/05/22 and 10/19/22 falls, placing R14 at risk for further falls.
The facility failed to revise R14's care plan with relevant fall interventions to prevent further falls for R14, placing the resident at risk for further falls and injury.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU -injury t...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU -injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services in a timely manner after the development of a pressure ulcer for one of two sampled Residents (R) 9. This placed the resident at risk for delayed healing and further pressure injury.
Findings included:
- R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), lymphedema (localized swelling of the body caused by an abnormal accumulation of lymph), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which actual. depth of the ulcer is completely obscured by slough [yellow, tan, gray, green, or brown] and/or eschar [tan, brown, or black] in the wound bed) of right heel.
The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R9 required supervision for eating, extensive assistance of one staff for hygiene, and two staff with transfers, toileting, bed mobility, walking, and dressing.
The Fall Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/07/22, documented R9 had functional limited range of motion (ROM) to both lower extremities, and limited ROM and hand-eye coordination. R9's balance was not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance and non-ambulatory with use of a wheelchair and a walker for mobility. R9 had no recent falls but was at risk for falls and injuries.
The Pressure Ulcer Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R9 received hospice services and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing and toileting with frequent bladder incontinence.
The Pressure Ulcer Care Plan, dated 10/07/22, documented R9 was at risk for pressure ulcers and other skin impairments due to occasional incontinence, and reduced skin integrity. The care plan update on 11/27/22 directed staff to educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown, which included: transfers, positioning requirements, importance of taking care during ambulating, mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Staff would teach resident/family the importance of changing positions for prevention of pressure ulcers and encourage small frequent position changes. The update also directed staff to provide a pressure reduction mattress on the bed, and float R9's heels while lying down. The update on 12/15/22 directed staff to provide weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, type of tissue, and exudate (drainage) present.
The Wound Assessment, dated 10/27/22, documented a right heel PU wound, which measured 4 centimeters (cm) by 4.5 cm x 0, with 100% necrotic (dead) tissue.
The Progress Note, dated 10/29/22, documented staff cleansed R9's right heel PU and applied a new dressing. The note stated the open area on R9's heel was moist with yellow drainage and tenderness noted by the resident during cleaning and dressing. The note stated a boot was used over night to reduce pressure, and no shoe or support hose worn on that foot that day.
The Physician Order, dated 11/03/22 (seven days after the PU was discovered), directed staff to ensure R9's heels were up on the blue pillow, while in bed, two times a day.
The Physician Order, dated 11/04/22, directed staff to apply Betadine (antiseptic used for skin disinfection) to R9's right heel twice daily (BID), then cover with Opti-foam (foam dressing) during the day for protection; remove the dressing at night and re-apply betadine.
The Physician Order, dated 11/16/22 (18 days after the PU discovered), directed staff to provide Vitamin C, 500 milligrams (mg) daily, and Arginaid Extra (ready-to-drink clear liquid supplement) twice daily.
The Wound Assessment, dated 11/27/22 recorded the right heel PU wound 5 cm by 6.5 cm x 0.2 cm, with 35% necrotic tissue.
The Registered Dietician Note, dated 11/30/22, documented R9 had a pressure ulcer on the right heel and the wound protocol in place was Vitamin C, multivitamin (MVI), and Arginaid.
The Wound Assessment, dated 12/14/22 recorded the right heel PU wound 1.4 cm by 2.2 cm by 0.1 cm with surrounding tissue healed, no necrotic tissue, wound edges were dry and appeared intact.
The Wound Assessment, dated 01/01/23, stated the right heel PU wound measured 2.3 cm by 1.3 cm by 0 cm.
On 12/28/22 at 03:13 PM, observation revealed R9 in the recliner, in his room, feet elevated, and a blue foot protector on his right foot.
On 01/03/22 at 04:15 PM observation revealed R9 sat in his recliner with his feet elevated, and the right foot with a blue pressure reduction boot on. Licensed Nurse (LN) G treated R9's right heel PU, which had minimal drainage, no redness, no odor or swelling.
On 01/04/23 at 08:50 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified staff should start interventions immediately upon discovery of a pressure area. She verified the lack of documentation staff notified the physician the day the PU was found. Administrative Nurse D stated staff placed the Betadine care order and to float heels on the treatment record 11/04/22, but did not add the heel protectors and mattress to the care plan until 11/10/22. Administrative Nurse D stated hospice staff ordered the Arginaid and Vitamin C. Administrative Nurse D verified the physician did not sign PU care orders until 11/15/22.
The facility did not provide a policy for pressure ulcer prevention as requested on 01/04/22.
The facility failed to provide care and services in a timely manner after the development of a pressure ulcer for R9 who developed an unstageable pressure ulcer. This placed the resident at risk for delayed healing and further pressure injury.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review,...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store oxygen cannulas (a lightweight tube with two prongs which are placed in the nostrils from which a mixture of air and oxygen flows) and tubing in sanitary condition for Resident (R) 13 and R11, and [NAME] dto ensure R11 received the correct oxygen flow setting. This placed the residents at risk for respiratory infection and insufficient oxygen level.
Findings included:
- R11's Physician Order Sheet (POS), documented diagnoses of chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD -progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), hypoxemia (abnormal deficiency in the concentration of oxygen in arterial blood), dependence on supplemental oxygen, and heart failure.
The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R11 had intact cognition, required supervision and one staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), R11 used a walker and wheelchair for mobility.
The ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 05/25/22, documented R11 had COPD, heart failure, and had dependence of oxygen.
The 12/02/22 Oxygen Care Plan, dated 12/02/22, documented R11 on oxygen therapy. The care plan directed staff to ensure oxygen tubing, canaster, and other supplies were labeled/bagged/changed to reduce the risk of infections.
The Physician Order, dated 11/19/22, directed staff to change oxygen tubing and clean the concentrator every Saturday for maintenance.
On 01/03/23 at 11:48 AM, R11 was observed in the exercise activity, independently ambulatory with walker, and groomed appropriately.
On 01/04/23 at 09:13 AM, R11 reported being a lazy breather. R11 explained she required oxygen when seated at rest and while she slept and was able to keep her oxygen levels up while walking or in activities. The oxygen machine located behind her recliner had a clear plastic bag, not labeled with a date or resident name, and appeared soiled. R11 reported the staff changed the tubing and bag whenever they got too it, and not on a routine basis.
On 01/04/22 at 10:33 AM Administrative Nurse D stated the oxygen tubing and bag should be changed and labeled weekly.
The facility's Oxygen Administration-Respiratory Therapy Prevention of Infection policy, dated 10/2010, documented the purpose of the procedure was to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration and prevention of infections associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment. The policy documented to change the oxygen cannula and tubing every seven days or as needed and keep the oxygen cannula and tubing in a plastic bag when not in use.
The facility failed to properly change and store oxygen equipment in a sanitary manner which placed R11 at risk for infection and respiratory complications.
- R13's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented diagnoses of dependence on supplemental oxygen, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD -progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and heart failure.
The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated 12/05/22, documented R13 had moderately impaired cognition, was independent to supervision with activities of daily living (ADL), had chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia as primary medical condition, and used oxygen.
The ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/26/22, documented R13 required oxygen.
The Oxygen Care Plan dated 12/28/22, documented R13 had oxygen therapy related to chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (excessive carbon dioxide in the bloodstream typically caused by inadequate respiration) and hypoxia. The care plan further documented the oxygen setting was ordered at two liters via nasal cannula (a lightweight tube with two prongs which are placed in the nostrils from which a mixture of air and oxygen flows).
The Physician Order, dated 03/05/22, documented the resident required an oxygen setting at one or two liters via nasal cannula for oxygen saturations above 88 percent (%).
The Physician Order, dated 07/17/21, directed staff to change oxygen tubing and clean filter in the oxygen concentrator every week for maintenance.
On 01/04/22 at 09:11 AM, observation revealed R13 seated in his recliner. R13 had oxygen in place via nasal cannula with a setting at four liter. The tubing storage bag was attached to the concentrator with a 07/21/22 date written on it, and a wheelchair with oxygen tubing and an uncovered/unbagged nasal cannula wrapped around a portable oxygen tank.
On 01/04/22 at 08:45 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN I) reported it was the staff's responsibility to check the oxygen settings and LN I verified the oxygen level had been set to four liters. R13 responded the setting should be set on two liters.
On 01/04/22 at 10:33 AM Administrative Nurse D stated the oxygen tubing and bag should be changed and labeled weekly and oxygen setting should be set at physician orders.
The facility's Oxygen Administration-Respiratory Therapy Prevention of Infection policy, dated 10/2010, documented the purpose of the procedure was to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration and prevention of infections associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment. The policy documented to change the oxygen cannula and tubing every seven days or as needed and keep the oxygen cannula and tubing [NAME] plastic bag when not in use.
The facility failed to properly change and store oxygen in a sanitary manner and failed to ensure the correct flow rate which placed R13 at risk for infection and respiratory complications.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, of which five were reviewed for unnecessary medicat...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, of which five were reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of a stop date for the use of an as needed antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive anxiety, nervousness, or tension) medication and documentation of targeted behaviors for the use of antianxiety and antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing)) and other mental emotional conditions) medications for Resident (R) 16, and lack of behavior monitoring and weekly vital signs for R10. This deficient practice placed R16 and R10 at risk for inappropriate use of antianxiety, antipsychotic, and blood pressure medication.
Findings included:
- R16's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 09/29/22, documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) with early onset, bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) without behavioral disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and psychotic disturbance.
The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R16 had severe cognitive impairment, had physical and verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, and wandering during the look back period. The MDS further documented R16 received an antipsychotic, antianxiety, and an antidepressant on a routine basis.
The Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/15/22, documented R16 had Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain) with behavioral disturbance, insomnia (inability to sleep) and bipolar disorder. R16 took mirtazapine (antidepressant) for insomnia, risperidone (antipsychotic) for neurocognitive (decreased mental function due to a medical disease other than a psychiatric illness) disorder with behavioral disturbance, and Xanax (antianxiety medication) for anxiety. The CAA further documented R16 was at risk for adverse consequences due to medication use.
The Medication Care Plan, dated 11/04/22, documented R16 as at risk for medication adverse reactions related to Black Box Warnings for Risperdal, Xanax, and mirtazapine, and to monitor for possible signs and symptoms, which included: falls, weight loss, fatigue agitation, depression, lethargy, unsteadiness, confusion, poor appetite, constipation, diarrhea, bruising, red eyes, and to notify the charge nurse. The care further documented the CP would be review medications monthly.
The Physician Order, dated 08/30/22, directed staff to administer risperidone 0.5 milligrams (mg) every morning and at bedtime for neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance.
The Physician Order, dated 08/04/22, directed staff to administer Xanax 0.25 mg two times a day for anxiety.
The Physician Order, dated 11/18/22, directed staff to administer Xanax 0.25 mg every 24 hours as needed for increased anxiety/behaviors, and may be used to help induce sleep. The order lacked a stop date.
The Pharmacy Reviews lacked evidence the CP identified and reported the lack of a stop date for the use of as needed psychotropic medication and the lack of targeted behavior monitoring related with the use of Xanax, as needed Xanax, and risperidone.
On 01/03/23 at 09:10 AM observation revealed R16 checked her room with the housekeeping staff cleaning R16's room. R16 was independently mobile. R16 expressed concern over another resident coughing, and the staff reassured R16 the other resident was all right.
On 01/04/23 at 10:36 AM, Administrative Nurse D, verified the Xanax order did not have a 14 day stop date. Administrative Nurse D stated targeted behaviors for the use of psychotropic medications should be on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and verified the facility lacked targeted behavior monitoring on the resident's TAR.
The facility's Pharmacy Services-Role of the Consultant Pharmacist policy, dated 04/2019, documented the Consultant Pharmacist would provide specific activities related to medication regimen of each resident at least monthly, or more frequently under certain conditions, based on the applicable federal and state guidelines: Appropriate communication of information to prescribers and facility leadership about potential of actual problems related to any aspect of medications and pharmacy services, including medication irregularities, and pertinent resident-specific documentation in the medical record as indicated.
The facility failed to ensure the CP identified and reported to the Director of Nursing, medical director, and the physician, the lack of a stop date for as needed Xanax and the lack of monitoring of target behaviors with the use of routine Xanax and risperidone, which placed R16 at risk for inappropriate use of psychotropic medications.
- R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), obesity (condition of being overweight), and anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities).
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R10 had verbal and other behaviors, was independent with walking, and required supervision for eating, transfers, bed mobility, and limited assistance of one staff for dressing, toileting, and hygiene.
The Medication Care Plan, dated 11/26/22, directed staff to observe for medication adverse reactions related to Lisinopril (antihypertensive) and give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered. Staff would monitor for side effects such as orthostatic hypotension and increased heart rate and effectiveness.
The Physician Order, dated 11/29/21, directed staff to administer Lisinopril, 40 milligrams (mg) daily. The order included parameters for notification to the physician: If the systolic blood pressure (top number) was less than 90 or greater than 200 and if the diastolic blood pressure (lower number) was less than 50 or greater than 110.
R10's EMR showed the last two blood pressures were documented in June 2022 and December 2022.
The Pharmacy Reviews lacked evidence the CP identified the lack of blood pressures.
On 12/29/22 at 08:24 AM, observation revealed R10 sat calmly waiting until Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R got his medications out. CMA R obtained R10's blood pressure, pulse, and oxygen level before administering his medications. R 10 took the pills whole without problem.
On 01/04/23 at 11:45 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) J stated the blood pressure parameters in place for the resident were to notify the physician if the resident's blood pressure was less than 90 or over 200 systolic, and less than 50 or greater than 110 diastolic. LN J verified the lack of documentation of weekly blood pressures.
On 01/04/23 at 12:00 PM, CMA R stated staff did not document R10's blood pressures weekly. She stated she obtained his blood pressure when giving medications routinely, just for her own information, but R10 did not like it and told her the other nurses did not check his blood pressure.
On 01/04/23 at 12:01 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified staff should have obtained R10's vital signs weekly as ordered.
The facility's Pharmacy Services-Role of the Consultant Pharmacist policy, dated 04/2019, documented the Consultant Pharmacist would provide specific activities related to medication regimen of each resident at least monthly, or more frequently under certain conditions, based on the applicable federal and state guidelines: Appropriate communication of information to prescribers and facility leadership about potential of actual problems related to any aspect of medications and pharmacy services, including medication irregularities, and pertinent resident-specific documentation in the medical record as indicated.
The facility failed to ensure the CP identified and reported the lack of weekly vital signs as ordered by the physician to monitor the efficacy of R10's blood pressure medication, placing R10 at risk for adverse effects related to the lack of monitoring.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain weekly vital signs as ordered by the physician to monitor the efficacy of Resident (R) 10's blood pressure medication. This deficient practice placed R10 at risk for adverse effects of his medication.
Findings included:
- R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), obesity (condition of being overweight), and anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities).
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R10 had verbal and other behaviors, was independent with walking, and required supervision for eating, transfers, bed mobility, and limited assistance of one staff for dressing, toileting, and hygiene.
The Medication Care Plan, dated 11/26/22, directed staff to observe for medication adverse reactions related to Lisinopril (antihypertensive) and give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered. Staff would monitor for side effects such as orthostatic hypotension and increased heart rate and effectiveness.
The Physician Order, dated 11/29/21, directed staff to administer Lisinopril, 40 milligrams (mg) daily. The order included parameters for notification to the physician: If the systolic blood pressure (top number) was less than 90 or greater than 200 and if the diastolic blood pressure (lower number) was less than 50 or greater than 110.
R10's EMR showed the last two blood pressures were documented in June 2022 and December 2022.
On 12/29/22 at 08:24 AM, observation revealed R10 sat calmly waiting until Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R got his medications out. CMA R obtained R10's blood pressure, pulse, and oxygen level before administering his medications. R 10 took the pills whole without problem.
On 01/04/23 at 11:45 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) J stated the blood pressure parameters in place for the resident were to notify the physician if the resident's blood pressure was less than 90 or over 200 systolic, and less than 50 or greater than 110 diastolic. LN J verified the lack of documentation of weekly blood pressures.
On 01/04/23 at 12:00 PM, CMA R stated staff did not document R10's blood pressures weekly. She stated she obtained his blood pressure when giving medications routinely, just for her own information, but R10 did not like it and told her the other nurses did not check his blood pressure.
On 01/04/23 at 12:01 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified staff should have obtained R10's vital signs weekly as ordered.
The facility Medication and Treatment Orders policy, dated July 2016, documented drug and biological orders would be written, dated, and signed by the person lawfully authorized to give such an order.
The facility failed to obtain weekly vital signs as ordered by the physician to monitor the efficacy of R10's blood pressure medication, placing R10 at risk for adverse effects related to the lack of monitoring.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Bas...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)16's as needed antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive nervousness, or tension) medication had a stop date as required and further failed to ensure targeted behavior monitoring for the use of antianxiety and antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing and other mental emotional conditions)) medication use. R10 also lacked behavior monitoring for the use of mood altering medication and antipsychotic medication, and lacked a gradual dose reduction for an antidepressant (medication used to treat abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness). This deficient practice placed R16 and R10 at risk for adverse side effects related to psychotropic medication use.
Finding included:
- R16's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 09/29/22, documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) with early onset, bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) without behavioral disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and psychotic disturbance.
The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R16 had severe cognitive impairment, had physical and verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, and wandering during the look back period. The MDS further documented R16 received an antipsychotic, antianxiety, and an antidepressant on a routine basis.
The Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/15/22, documented R16 had Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain) with behavioral disturbance, insomnia (inability to sleep) and bipolar disorder. R16 took risperidone (antipsychotic) for neurocognitive (decreased mental function due to a medical disease other than a psychiatric illness) disorder with behavioral disturbance and Xanax (antianxiety) for anxiety. The CAA further documented R16 was at risk for adverse consequences due to medication use.
The Medication Care Plan, dated 11/04/22, documented R16 at risk for medication adverse reactions related to Black Box Warnings for Risperdal (medication to treat psychosis), Xanax (medication used to treat anxiety), and mirtazapine (medication used to treat depression), and to monitor for possible signs and symptoms, which included: falls, weight loss, fatigue agitation, depression, lethargy, unsteadiness, confusion, poor appetite, constipation, diarrhea, bruising, red eyes, and to notify the charge nurse. The care plan further documented the CP would be review medications monthly.
The Physician Order, dated 08/30/22, directed staff to administer risperidone 0.5 milligrams (mg) every morning and at bedtime for neurocognitive (decreased mental function due to a medical disease other than a psychiatric illness) disorder with behavioral disturbance.
The Physician Order, dated 08/04/22, directed staff to administer Xanax 0.25 mg two times a day for anxiety.
The Physician Order, dated 11/18/22, directed staff to administer Xanax 0.25 mg every 24 hours as needed for increased anxiety/behaviors, and may be used to help induce sleep. The order lacked a stop date.
On 01/03/23 at 09:10 AM observation revealed R16 checked her room with the housekeeping staff. R16 was independently mobile and expressed concern over another resident coughing. Staff present offered R16 reassurance about the other resident.
On 01/04/23 at 10:36 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the Xanax order did not have a 14 day stop date. Administrative Nurse D stated target behaviors for the use of psychotropic medications should be on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and verified the facility lacked targeted behavior monitoring on the TAR for R16.
The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, dated 07/2022, documented R16 who have used psychotropic medication to be necessary to treat a specific condition, and as needed orders for psychotropic medication are limited to 14 days or the attending physician would document the rationale for extending the use and include duration for the as needed order. The policy further documented consideration of the use of any psychotropic medication is based on comprehensive review of the resident. This included evaluation of the resident's signs and symptoms in order to identify underlying causes.
The facility failed to ensure R16 as needed antianxiety medication had a stop date as required and behavior monitoring for the use of antianxiety ad antipsychotic medications, which placed R16 at risk for adverse side effects related to psychotropic medication use.
- R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (condition where symptoms of both psychotic and mood disorders are present together during one episode), borderline personality disorder (characterized by severe mood swings, impulsive behavior, and difficulty forming stable personal relationships) and anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities).
The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R10 had verbal and other behaviors, was independent with walking, and required supervision for eating, transfers, bed mobility, and limited assistance of one staff for dressing, toileting, and hygiene. The MDS documented R10 received antidepressant and antipsychotic medications seven days of the lookback period.
The Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 11/22/22, documented R10 received Abilify (antipsychotic) for psychosis (severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality), bupropion (antidepressant) and Zoloft (antidepressant) for depression.
The Medication Care Plan, dated 11/26/22, directed staff to monitor for medication adverse reactions related to the Black Box Warnings (highest adverse effect warnings) of the following medications: bupropion, Zoloft, Depakote, and Abilify. Black Box Warnings for all listed drugs could be found in the physician orders and the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR). Obtain and monitor lab work as ordered, report results to the physician and follow up as indicated. Staff would administer antidepressant medications as ordered by physician, monitor/document side effects and effectiveness every shift. Staff would administer psychotropic medications as ordered by physician, monitor for side effects and effectiveness every shift. Consult with pharmacist and physician to consider dosage reduction when clinically appropriate.
The Behavior Care Plan directed staff to administer medications as ordered, monitor and document for side effects and effectiveness and monitor, document, and report any changes in cognitive function.
The resident's Physician Orders included the following medications:
Abilify, 5 milligrams (mg) twice daily.
Bupropion ER (extended release) 150 mg, twice daily.
Depakote (mood stabilizer), 500 mg, three times daily
Zoloft 100 mg daily.
The EMR lacked routine behavior monitoring for psychotropic and antidepressant medication ordered for a specific condition.
The Pharmacist Reviews documented no recommendations for 02/18/22, 03/17/22, 04/14/22, 05/18/22, 07/19/22, 08/23/22, 09/21/22, 10/14/22, and 12/28/22.
The Pharmacist Review, dated 06/21/22, recommended a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for Abilify, bupropion, and Zoloft. The physician wrote patient stable at this time medication changes will cause more of an issue for him than help.
The Pharmacist Review, dated 11/3/22, recommended GDRs for bupropion and Zoloft which the physician declined, but provided no rationale for the continued use of the antidepressants.
On 12/29/22 at 08:24 AM, observation revealed R10 sat calmly waiting until Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R got his medications out. CMA R obtained R10's blood pressure, pulse, and oxygen level before administering his medications. R 10 took the pills whole without problem.
On 01/04/23 at 12:01 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified a lack of rationale for no GDR of psychotropic drugs and stated the consultant pharmacist had not notified her of the need for a rationale.
The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, dated 07/2022, documented R16 who have used psychotropic medication to be necessary to treat a specific condition, and as needed orders for psychotropic medication are limited to 14 days or the attending physician would document the rationale for extending the use and include duration for the as needed order. The policy further documented consideration of the use of any psychotropic medication is based on comprehensive review of the resident. This included evaluation of the resident's signs and symptoms in order to identify underlying causes.
The facility failed to routinely monitor R10 for the use of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, and failed to attempt a GDR or provide a rationale from the physician, which placed R16 at risk for adverse side effects related to psychotropic medication use.
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary con...
Read full inspector narrative →
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary condition for 36 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen, placing them at risk for food borne illness.
Findings included:
- On 12/28/22 at 08:10 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen observations revealed the following:
In the three-door stainless steel refrigerator in the kitchen had a large container of low-fat cottage cheese with a use by date of 12/15/22 and one and a half large blocks of cream cheese with a use by date of 11/05/22. Dietary Staff (DS) BB removed the items and discarded them.
The east nurse's station commons area black residential refrigerator had an uncovered bowl of white gravy and fruit, and a small container of sour cream with a use by date of 12/24/22. Items were discarded by staff.
The facility Food Receiving and Storage policy, dated 11/2022, documented all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer would be covered, labeled, and dated (use by date). Date would be monitored so they were used by their use by date date, frozen, or discarded. Foods and snacks kept on nursing units would be labeled with use by date. All foods belonging to residents are to be labeled with the resident's name, the item, and the use by date. Partially eaten food is not kept in the refrigerator.
The facility failed to store, prepare, and serve, food under sanitary conditions for 36 residents who receive meals prepared in the facility's kitchen, placing the residents at risk for food borne illness.