Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center

246 East Main Street, Beattyville, KY 41311 (606) 464-3611
For profit - Corporation 109 Beds SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
95/100
#21 of 266 in KY
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center has earned a Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility with exceptional standards of care. Ranking #21 out of 266 nursing homes in Kentucky places it firmly in the top half, and it is the only option in Lee County, meaning it stands out locally. The facility is improving, with a reduction in issues from one in 2019 to none reported in 2024. Staffing is a mixed bag, with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 22%, which is good compared to the state average of 46%, but the RN coverage is average. While there have been no fines, which is a positive sign, past inspection findings raised concerns about expired medical supplies and inadequate hygiene care for some residents, highlighting areas that need attention despite the overall strong performance.

Trust Score
A+
95/100
In Kentucky
#21/266
Top 7%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
1 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
22% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 26 points below Kentucky's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kentucky facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 46 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kentucky. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2019: 1 issues
2024: 0 issues

The Good

  • Low Staff Turnover (22%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (22%)

    26 points below Kentucky average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

Aug 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure supplies available for use were not expired in one (1) of three (3) medication rooms. Observation of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure supplies available for use were not expired in one (1) of three (3) medication rooms. Observation of the Seasons Unit's medication room on 08/01/19, revealed sixty (60) blue top serum vacutainer vials with the expiration date of 04/10/19 available for resident use. The findings include: Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/01/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed the facility did not have a policy related to the storage of laboratory supplies. Observation of the Seasons Unit's medication room on 08/01/19 at 12:57 PM, revealed a bin sitting on the counter, which contained sixty (60) blue top vacutainer vials utilized for blood collection with an expiration date of 04/10/19. Review of a Medication Room Audit tool, dated 2018 and 2019, revealed audits were performed in March and September of each year. Further review of the audit tool revealed the March 2019 audit had comments that all discontinued and expired medications and supplies were discarded. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 08/01/19 at 1:10 PM, revealed the vacutainer vials were used when the facility had to obtain a laboratory specimen. She further stated she could not remember the last time the facility had to perform a venipuncture to obtain a blood specimen. She added the facility's contract laboratory utilizes their own vials and does not use the facility's. The LPN then stated she was not sure who was responsible to audit the medication room for expired supplies. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, the Seasons Unit Manager, on 08/01/19 at 3:48 PM, revealed the medication room was audited two (2) times per year for expired/damaged items. She stated this usually occurred in the spring and fall of the year. She then added the expired laboratory vacutainer vials should have been discarded due to the possibility of incorrect results if an expired vacutainer was used. Interview with the DON on 08/01/19 at 4:15 PM, revealed that two (2) times a year a big cleaning and audit for expired supplies occurred. She further stated it was the responsibility of the staff to check before using any supply to ensure it was not expired.
May 2018 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure two ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure two (2) of twenty-three sampled (23) residents (Resident #68 and Resident #92) received the necessary care and services to maintain grooming and hygiene. Observation of incontinence care for Resident #68 on 05/23/18, revealed staff failed to provide the resident with incontinence care every two (2) hours as required. In addition, after providing Resident #68 with incontinence care, staff were observed to place the resident back onto the urine-soiled mattress without cleaning the mattress. Observation of Resident #92 on 05/23/18, revealed the resident was in bed and observed to have soiled feet; however, the resident had been provided a bed bath approximately 20 minutes earlier. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Perineal Care Male or Female, with a revision date of 12/03/15, revealed the policy did not address how often incontinence care should be provided, or the cleaning of the mattress if it has been soiled during an incontinence episode. Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 11/21/17, with diagnoses that included Unstageable Area to Right Buttock, Alzheimer's Dementia, and Osteomyelitis of the Left Foot. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed by the facility for Resident #68 dated 04/06/18, revealed the resident had been assessed to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five (5), which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #68's comprehensive care plan dated 05/10/18, revealed interventions to provide incontinence care every two (2) hours and as needed, and to keep the resident's skin clean and dry. Observation of incontinence care for Resident #68 on 05/23/18 at 9:30 AM, revealed State Registered Nursing Assistant (SRNA) #3 and SRNA #4 washed/sanitized their hands and donned gloves. SRNA #3 then removed the resident's brief, which was observed to be saturated with urine. The resident's gown, drawsheet, and mattress were also observed to be saturated with urine. Continued observation revealed SRNA #3 provided incontinence care for Resident #68, applied a clean brief and gown to the resident, and changed the drawsheet on the bed. However, the SRNAs failed to clean or dry the mattress, and Resident #68 was placed onto the urine-soaked mattress. Interview conducted with SRNA #3 and SRNA #4 on 05/23/18 at 9:40 AM, revealed Resident #68 had not been provided incontinence care since approximately 6:00 AM. The SRNAs stated they had been busy and had not had time to change the resident within the two-hour timeframe the resident was assessed to require. The SRNAs stated they should have also cleaned and dried the mattress prior to placing Resident #68 back onto it. Interview conducted with License Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 on 05/24/18 at 3:44 PM, revealed she made rounds every two (2) hours to ensure residents received the care they required. The LPN stated that Resident #68 was to receive incontinence care every two (2) hours and as needed, and that staff should not have placed the resident onto the mattress until it had been cleaned and dried. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/24/18 at 4:15 PM, revealed she made rounds daily and provided random spot checks to ensure care was being provided as required. The DON stated she had not identified any concerns related to residents not receiving timely incontinence care, or staff not properly cleaning/drying mattresses that become soiled. 2. Review of the facility's policy titled, Shower/Tub bath Competency, with a revision date of 08/24/17, revealed staff were required to assist residents into the shower and to provide assistance as needed to complete the bath or shower. Review of the medical record for Resident #92 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 07/15/15, with diagnoses including Mental Retardation, Cellulitis of Lower Extremities, Dementia, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of a significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a BIMS score of three (3) which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS also revealed the resident required extensive assistance of two (2) persons for personal hygiene and bathing. Observation of Resident #92 on 05/23/18, at 11:54 AM, revealed the resident was observed to be in bed with his/her feet uncovered with a dark buildup of dirt on the soles of his/her feet. However, review of Resident #92's bathing sheet dated 05/23/18, and interview with SRNA #1 on 05/24/18 at 8:30 AM revealed Resident #92 had been given a bed bath on 05/23/18 at approximately 11:30 AM. Continued interview with SRNA #1 on 05/24/18 at 8:30 AM, revealed she always washed Resident #92's feet when providing the resident with a bed bath. However, she had not been aware that Resident #92's feet remained soiled after having provided the bed bath to the resident on 05/23/18. Interview conducted with LPN #2 on 05/24/18 at 3:44 PM, revealed she made rounds every two (2) hours to ensure residents were receiving the care they had been assessed to require. LPN #2 stated she had identified no concerns with residents not receiving appropriate care during bathing. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/24/18 at 4:15 PM, revealed she made rounds daily and provided random spot checks to ensure care was being provided as required by the resident. The DON stated the SRNAs were required to check the care plan daily and as needed to obtain the care required by the residents. The DON stated Resident #92's feet should not have remained soiled on 05/23/18 after receiving a bed bath.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Kentucky.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kentucky facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Kentucky, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center Staffed?

CMS rates Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 22%, compared to the Kentucky average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center during 2018 to 2019. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center?

Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 109 certified beds and approximately 101 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Beattyville, Kentucky.

How Does Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Kentucky Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kentucky, Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (22%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kentucky. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?

Staff at Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 22%, the facility is 24 percentage points below the Kentucky average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 6%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?

Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Lee County Care And Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?

Lee County Care and Rehabilitation Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.