CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/03/2021 with diagnoses of Parkinson...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/03/2021 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (involuntary, erratic writhing movements of the face, arms, legs, or trunk), epilepsy, spondylosis (age related wear and tear of the spinal disks), and history of multiple fractures of the pelvis with unstable disruption of the pelvic ring.
Review of Resident #13's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 12/10/2021, revealed a score of fourteen (14) of fifteen (15), which indicated no cognitive impairment.
Review of Resident #13's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 12/03/2021, revealed the facility assessed Resident #13 as having poor vision, balance problems while standing and walking, decreased muscular coordination, was jerking/instable when making turns, and required the use of an assistive device (a walker or wheelchair). Further review of the assessment revealed Resident #13 had a history of three (3) or more falls in the last three (3) months and had neuromuscular and orthopedic limitations. Resident #13's fall risk score was documented as twenty-two (22) where a score of ten (10) or more indicated a high risk for falls.
Review of #13's admission Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP), dated 12/03/2021, revealed the facility assessed the resident as at risk for falls related to weakness, limited mobility, tremors, medication use, a history of falls, and diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a neurological disorder with involuntary tremors/jerking movements, epilepsy (a seizure disorder), and osteoporosis (brittle/fragile bones). Further review revealed goals that included fall prevention approaches to help minimize fall risk. Interventions or approaches, dated 12/03/2021, included to make sure the call light was accessible in the bed or in the chair in the room, check regularly to assure resident safety and needs were met, and be aware that some medications increased the risk of falls. Interventions/approaches added on 12/16/2021 included the bed was to be kept in the lowest position to minimize the risk of injury if a fall occurred while trying to get out of bed, care items were to be kept in the same place and within reach, reminders to ask for help rather than try getting up alone, and to call for assistance before attempting to transfer, ambulate, or go to the bathroom were to be implemented.
Review of Resident #13's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 05/23/2022, revealed the resident had been assessed as having balance problems while standing and walking, decreased muscular coordination, a change in gait pattern when going through a doorway, was jerking/instable when making turns, and required the use of an assistive device (a walker or wheelchair). Further review of the assessment revealed Resident #13 had a history of one (1) or two (2) falls in the last three (3) months and had neuromuscular, psychiatric, or cognitive and orthopedic limitations. Resident #13's fall risk score was documented as eighteen (18) where a score of ten (10) or more indicated a high risk for falls.
Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 04/29/2022, revealed a score of fourteen (14) of fifteen (15), which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of section GG of the same assessment revealed the facility assessed Resident #13 as requiring partial to moderate assistance with one (1) staff person for toileting and supervision assistance with one (1) staff person for transfers.
a) Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 06/17/2022 at 3:49 PM by LPN #20, revealed she heard screaming from Resident #13's room and found the resident lying in the doorway of her room. LPN #20 documented Resident #13 had stated he/she was fixing his/her wheelchair and fell and was screaming that he/she had broken his/her hip. LPN #20 documented she placed a pillow under Resident #13's head, assessed him/her, called 911, notified the physician, called report to the hospital, and notified Resident #13's daughter he/she was being sent to the emergency room (ER).
Review of Resident #13's Post Fall Risk Observation dated 06/17/2022 at 3:39 PM, revealed LPN #20 had documented she heard screaming from Resident #13's room, and upon entering Resident #13's room, she found Resident #13 lying in the inside doorway of his/her room, screaming he/she had broken his/her hip and the pain was terrible. LPN #20 further documented she placed a pillow under Resident #13's head and assessed his/her vitals, while the resident remained in place on the floor. LPN #20 documented Resident #13 stated he/she was standing up fixing the seat of his/her wheelchair when he/she fell. LPN #20 documented she called aides to the room to sit with Resident #13, notified the physician, called 911, called report to the ER, and notified Resident #13's daughter. Further review revealed LPN #20 documented after Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) arrived, she and the two (2) EMTs picked Resident #13 up from the floor and transferred him/her to a stretcher, paperwork for Resident #13 was provided, and Resident #13 was sent to the ER. Continued review revealed Resident #13 was assessed to have had a history of falls both prior to and since admission to the facility and to have had three (3) or more falls within the last three (3) months. Resident #13's contributing factors were assessed as Neuromuscular/Functional to include Parkinson's. Resident #13's Fall Risk Score was determined to be ten (10), with any score between zero and ten (0-10) indicating an average fall risk. Review of the evaluation notes section revealed Resident #13 was standing in his/her room fixing the wheelchair cushion, lost his/her balance, and fell to the floor.
Review of #13's Progress Note dated 06/24/2022 at 5:00 PM by LPN #18 revealed Resident #13 was re-admitted to the facility from the hospital after surgery to the left hip for a fracture with ten (10) staples, which were dry and intact.
Review of Resident #13's CCP for falls initiated on 12/03/2021 and revised on 12/16/2021 revealed no added interventions related to the fall and hip fracture.
Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 08/16/2022, revealed a score of thirteen (13) of fifteen (15), indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Section GG of the same assessment revealed Resident #13 was assessed as requiring partial to moderate assistance with one (1) staff person for toileting and partial to moderate assistance with one (1) staff person for transfers.
b) Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 11/10/2022 at 1:22 PM by LPN #18, revealed she was called to Resident #13's room by staff, and the resident was noted to be lying parallel to the left side of the bed on the floor closest to the window. Resident #13 stated he/she was trying to make the bed on his/her own while sitting up in the wheelchair, the front wheel of the wheelchair got caught on something, and he/she fell out of the wheelchair. Per the note, the facility assessed Resident #13 for pain and injury at that time, and neither were found. Then, at approximately 3:00 PM, swelling and bruising were noted at the right side of Resident #13's hand near the thumb. The note stated the physician was notified, and an X-ray was ordered.
Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 11/10/2022 at 7:48 PM by LPN #22, revealed she had received the X-ray results which showed a fracture of Resident #13's right thumb. Resident #13's daughter/responsible person had been notified, and LPN #22 documented Resident #13's daughter had expressed concern about Resident #13 attempting to keep his/her independence and continuing to attempt to get up on his/her own. LPN #22 documented Resident #13's daughter stated, [the resident is] stubborn and is going to do what [he/she] is going to do.
Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed no Post Risk Fall Observation had been documented.
Review of Resident #13's CCP for falls initiated on 12/03/2021 and revised on 12/16/2021 revealed no added interventions related to the fall and thumb fracture.
Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 12/31/2022, revealed a score of twelve (12) of fifteen (15), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Section GG of the same assessment revealed the facility assessed Resident #13 as requiring partial to moderate assistance with one (1) staff person for toileting and supervision assistance with one (1) staff person for transfers.
c) Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 02/01/2023 at 12:42 PM, revealed Resident #13 was found on the floor in his/her room with his/her legs out into the bathroom floor with blood coming from Resident #13's head. The facility assessed Resident #13 to be alert and stated that he/she was just trying to go stand for a moment to readjust himself/herself in the wheelchair in the bathroom and lost his/her balance, falling into the shower enclosure. Per the note, a call was placed to 911 for transport to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation and treatment due to Resident #13 having an unwitnessed fall and two (2) open areas to the front of his/her head.
Review of Resident #13's Progress note dated 02/02/2023 at 5:14 PM, revealed Resident #13 had returned from the ER with a diagnosis of left clavicle (collar bone) fracture and a bruise to the forehead. Resident #13 was noted to be alert with a sling to his/her left arm in place.
Review of Resident #13's Post Fall Observation Report dated 02/01/2023 at 5:43 PM by LPN #1, revealed he documented Resident #13 was found on the floor of the shower stall lying on his/her left side bleeding from the head and with complaints of pain to the left shoulder. Further review revealed the facility assessed Resident #13 to have been attempting to self-transfer in response to the need to use the bathroom. Resident #13 was documented as having decreased range of motion or voluntary movement of an extremity, unsteady gait, poor safety awareness, episodes of dizziness, pain issues, poor judgement, and bladder/bowel incontinence. Resident #13 additionally had used a wheelchair for mobility assistance and had a history of falls since admission to the facility and a history of falls in the last thirty (30) days. Per the report, the resident also had one (1) or two (2) falls within the last three (3) months. Resident #13's contributing factors were assessed as perceptual, Neuromuscular/Functional to include Parkinson's, psychiatric or cognitive, and orthopedic. Resident #13's Fall Risk Score was determined to be twenty-three (23), with any score above ten (10) indicating a high fall risk.
Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 02/02/2023 at 6:32 AM, revealed the Minimum Data Set Nurse #1 (MDS #1) had documented Resident #13 had sustained a new left clavicle fracture. The note also stated because of the nature of the fracture, all aspects of Resident #13's care would be impacted, and a Significant Change in Status Assessment would be completed within fourteen (14) days.
Review of Resident #13's CCP for falls initiated on 12/03/2021 revealed on 02/02/2023 the approach/intervention to help arrange an appointment with the physician for pain management and a medication review had been added related to the fall and left clavicle fracture.
Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 04/14/2023, revealed a score of eleven (11) of fifteen (15), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Section GG of the same assessment revealed Resident #13 was assessed as requiring partial to moderate assistance with one (1) staff person for toileting and partial to moderate assistance with one (1) staff person for transfers.
d) Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 04/26/2023 at 4:38 PM, revealed Resident #13 was found by staff during rounds lying on his/her back on the floor next to the bathroom. The note documented Resident #13 had stated his/her chair had fallen out from under him/her, and he/she hit the floor. Per the note, neurological checks were begun, and Resident #13 was documented as being concerned with eating supper in the dining room. The note further documented at 6:00 PM Resident #13 had stopped the nurse in the hallway and stated, something is really wrong, my neck and the whole left side of my head hurts. The note further documented Resident #13 was transported to the hospital.
Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 04/26/2023 at 10:45 PM, revealed the emergency room had called and reported Resident #13 was diagnosed with a closed cervical vertebra (C1) [NAME] fracture and admitted to the hospital. Per the note, treatment was non-surgical, and the resident was to wear a cervical collar for twelve (12) weeks.
Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 05/01/2023 at 5:50 PM, revealed Resident #13 had returned to the facility via stretcher awake, alert, and oriented with a cervical-collar brace
intact to neck.
Review of Resident #13's Post Fall Observation Report dated 04/26/2023 untimed and unsigned, revealed Resident #13 was alert and oriented times three (3) with reliable safety awareness, had adequate vision, and required the use of an assistive device for balance and gait. Resident #13's history of three (3) or more falls in the last three (3) months was noted. Resident #13's contributing factors were assessed as Neuromuscular/Functional to include Parkinson's and orthopedic. Resident #13's Fall Risk Score was determined to be fifteen (15), with any score above ten (10) indicating a high fall risk.
Review of Resident #13's CCP for falls initiated on 12/03/2021 revealed on 04/26/2023 the approach/intervention to apply Dycem (an adhesive film) to the wheelchair seat to help maintain proper positioning while in the wheelchair had been added related to the fall and C1 [NAME] fracture.
Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 08/04/2023, revealed a score of twelve (12) of fifteen (15), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of section GG of the same assessment revealed Resident #13 was assessed as requiring partial to moderate assistance with one (1) staff person for toileting and assistance with one (1) staff person for transfers.
e) Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 10/21/2023 at 11:00 AM, revealed Resident #13 was observed lying on his/her left side in the bathroom on the floor by the sink with bleeding from the top of the forehead. Resident #13 had reported that he/she was attempting to go to the restroom. It was noted that the resident's call light was not on at the time of the event. Per the note, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was called, and Resident #13 was transported by ambulance to the ER.
Review of Resident #13's Post Fall Observation Report dated 10/21/2023 at 11:35 AM by LPN #1, revealed Resident #13 was found in the bathroom lying on his/her left side next to the sink. The facility assessed Resident #13 to have been attempting to get out of the wheelchair without assistance, and the call light was not on in the resident's room. Resident #13 was assessed to have decreased range of motion or voluntary movement of an extremity, unsteady gait, displayed poor safety awareness, had episodes of dizziness, poor judgment, and bowel or bladder incontinence. Continued review revealed Resident #13 utilized a wheelchair for assistance which was in use at the time of the fall. The immediate intervention documented was for Resident #13 to utilize the call light when needing to get out of the wheelchair. Resident #13's Fall Risk Score was determined to be eighteen (18), with any score above ten (10) indicating a high fall risk.
Review of Resident #13's CCP for falls initiated on 12/03/2021 revealed on 10/21/2023 the approach/interventions to check on Resident #13 every two (2) hours while in bed, to assess needs every shift, and review medications with the neurologist had been added related to the fall and C1 [NAME] fracture.
Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 10/21/2023 at 7:10 PM, revealed Resident #13 returned to the facility on [DATE] at 7:10 PM.
Record review revealed on 12/01/2023 from 9:00 to 9:20 AM, Resident #13 was observed self-propelling in the wheelchair very slowly and deliberately using only his/her feet. Resident #13 was observed rocking the wheelchair forward and backward several times to get over the threshold strips in the doorways between the hall and his/her room, between the kitchenette and bedroom, and between the bedroom to the restroom.
In an interview on 12/01/2023 at 9:20 AM, Resident #13 stated he/she would not try and get out of the wheelchair on his/her own because he/she was not strong enough to do it. Resident #13 stated he/she had fallen nineteen (19) times since he/she came to the facility. Resident #13 also stated he/she did not have to wait long for staff to come if he/she put the call light on but stated he/she sometimes thought he/she could do things for himself/herself, did not call for assistance, and then realized after he/she had fallen that he/she should not have done that. A sign with call, do not fall written on it was observed on the wall in Resident #13's bathroom between the sink and toilet which was not visible if the resident was sitting on the toilet. When asked if he/she had difficulty getting the wheelchair through the doorways of his/her room into the bathroom or the kitchenette, Resident #13 stated yes but that was where the trash cans were located. Resident #13 stated he/she was not participating in therapy anymore because it was not doing any good.
In an interview on 12/01/2023 at 9:30 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9, he stated he had been a nurse since 2001 and had been at the facility since October 2022. He stated he usually worked the floor for the 300 and 400 units but was currently filling in as the Unit Manager. LPN #9 stated Resident #13 was very impulsive and did not have great safety judgment/awareness. He further stated Resident #13 also had obsessive compulsive disorder (a psychological condition in which excessive thoughts lead to repetitive behaviors) and was constantly picking things off the floor like lint and tissue. He stated even though staff encouraged Resident #13 to call for assistance, he/she did not always listen. LPN #9 also stated after a fall, the document trail should be started immediately. He stated a Fall Observation Report should be completed in the resident's record, and there was a paper at the nurse's station which was a step-by-step guide for the nurses on how to complete the form. LPN #9 stated if a fall was unwitnessed, neurological checks would be started. He stated his expectation was that a care plan intervention would be placed immediately based on what happened with the resident at the time. However, he stated some floor nurses did that, and some did not. LPN #9 stated the Unit Managers and the Director of Nursing also put interventions in and would be responsible for making sure an intervention was placed during the daily Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) review.
In an interview on 12/01/2023 at 10:10 AM with LPN #1, he stated after a fall, a post fall assessment was documented in the resident's record, and an event form was completed. He stated the nurses did a head-to-toe assessment, a skin assessment, and a range of motion check on the resident. He stated if the fall was unwitnessed, neurological checks would be started on the resident; and if there was a wound, an order would be obtained for a treatment. LPN #1 stated Resident #13 had obsessive compulsive disorder and had very specific needs like having to pick up anything that was on the floor. He stated Resident #13 required constant reinforcement to use the call light and still attempted to get up on his/her own. He stated caring for Resident #13 and keeping him/her safe was a real challenge. LPN #1 stated care plan interventions should be based on what the resident was doing at the time of the fall, and the Unit Managers and the Director of Nursing updated them during the IDT meetings. He stated Resident #13 tended to roll away from the call bell and then attempted to get up per self.
In an interview on 12/01/2023 at 10:25 AM with State Trained Nurse Aide (STNA) #1, she stated Resident #13 was determined to get up per self. STNA #1 stated she remembered one time she had checked on Resident #13, and he/she was sitting by the window in his/her wheelchair. She stated, by the time she got to the nurse's station, in less than a minute, Resident #13 had fallen onto the floor. She further stated she could not believe that had happened because she had just checked on Resident #13.
In a telephone interview on 12/01/2023 at 6:45 PM with Resident #13's daughter, she stated the resident was a clean freak and could not leave anything on the floor. She stated the resident had to pick it up so he/she leaned forward and sometimes fell out of the wheelchair. Resident #13's daughter further stated the facility was looking into a seat cushion that sloped backwards for Resident #13's wheelchair so he/she will not be able to stand up or lean forward so easily on his/her own. Resident #13's daughter stated she was not sure the resident had the hand strength to use a Reacher (a hand tool used to extend a person's length of reach with a pincher end that was controlled by the person's hand grip). Resident #13's daughter further stated the resident always wanted to try and do things for himself/herself and was going to do whatever he/she wanted to do. Resident #13's daughter stated she had discussed her parent's situation with the neurologist and had been told increasing impulsiveness was an expected behavior and was a progression of the Parkinson's, and there was no medication that could help with it. She also stated the facility notified her of all Resident #13's falls, changes in condition, and medication changes.
In a telephone interview on 12/01/2023 at 7:01 PM with LPN #20, she stated she had worked at the facility for five (5) years and with the company for ten (10) years. She stated she currently worked at the sister facility and was on duty at this facility the night Resident #13 fell and broke his/her hip. She stated she could not remember if she was working as a floor nurse or as a manager. LPN #20 stated Resident #13 had a bad habit of bending over and trying to pick up stuff off the floor while sitting in his/her wheelchair as well as trying to stand on his/her own without assistance. She stated Resident #13 needed constant reminders to call for assistance. LPN #20 stated on the night of the incident, she heard a scream and found Resident #13 lying on the floor between his/her room and the hallway with the wheelchair at his/her feet, not tipped over. LPN #20 stated the neurologist told her the impulsiveness was a natural progression of the Parkinson's, and there was no medication for it. LPN #20 stated there was one time an STNA had checked in on Resident #13, and less than a minute later, Resident #13 had fallen to the floor. She stated it was her expectation residents were kept as safe as possible.
In an interview on 12/03/2023 at 1:15 PM with the Therapy Director (TD), she stated Functional Maintenance Programs (FMP) for Long Term Care residents could be indefinite in length and was available to all residents. The TD stated there was an FMP Nurse at the facility, and nursing staff was assigned the FMP tasks for residents. She stated she was not sure where resident participation in the program was documented by nursing. The TD explained FMP was implemented when a resident discharged from Physical Therapy/Occupational Therapy/Speech Therapy services. The TD stated in the case of Resident #13, therapy services could evaluate Resident #13 for the difficulty he/she was having with propelling the wheelchair over the doorway transition strips and also for a reacher to aid Resident #13 with picking up objects that were out of reach; they just needed a referral from nursing. The TD also confirmed that Resident #13 was on Palliative Care (care that focuses on pain and symptom relief from diseases as opposed to curing the illness), which did not impact referrals for therapy. During the interview, the TD stated the last therapy evaluation for Resident #13 was on 07/11/2023 for eating while in his/her cervical collar. The TD stated what she knew of Resident #13 was that he/she was very independent, determined, and set in his/her ways. She also stated Resident #13 had a history of refusals to participate, for example when and how and which activities he/she would participate in. The TD agreed maintaining resident safety was one of the most important responsibilities of the facility.
In an interview on 12/04/2023 at 10:10 AM with Physical Therapist (PT) #2, he stated Resident #13 had been on an FMP from 05/19/2023 to 11/17/2023 and had been on therapy services multiple times but was discharged for refusing to participate. He stated Resident #13's last documented therapy evaluation was for Speech Therapy and diet recommendations while he/she was wearing a cervical collar for a C1 [NAME] fracture. PT #2 stated during Resident #13's participation in the FMP, the program included ambulation of the resident on days he/she felt strong enough and his/her Parkinson's symptoms were not increased. He stated, on the average, Resident #13 participated in therapy/FMP once a week. PT #2 further stated Resident #13 had a history of being extremely independent, not liking to ask for assistance, and his/her compliance with interventions was not consistent. PT #2 also stated the TD attended IDT meetings which was the main way information was exchanged between all the care disciplines, and a referral for therapy services could be made at any time by nursing. He stated the Therapy department also had weekly meetings to discuss resident progress and discharge plans. He stated he felt like Resident#13 could be rounded on every fifteen (15) minutes and it would not make any difference because the resident was going to continue to get up on his/her own as long as he/she could.
In an interview on 12/04/2023 at 1:09 PM with Occupational Therapist #2 (OT #2), she stated she had not been Resident #13's therapist since 2020, and OT #1 had been his/her primary therapist more recently. OT #2 stated she knew Resident #13 was very impulsive and independent which was challenging with his/her Parkinson's diagnosis. She also stated Resident #13 could not propel himself/herself in the wheelchair with his/her hands and was dependent on using his/her feet to move the wheelchair. OT #2 stated she did recall OT #1 had evaluated Resident #13 for a wedge cushion or a rear sloped wheelchair seat to aid in keeping him/her from falling forward out of his/her wheelchair. She further stated the issue with a wedge cushion or rear sloped wheelchair seat was that it lifted Resident #13's feet higher up off the floor, and then he/she was unable to use his/her feet to move the wheelchair. She further stated a lower wheelchair was considered and was found to be impractical because Resident #13 was not able to reach the sink and personal items on the counter or bedside table. OT #2 stated finding the balance between securing Resident #13's safety and fall prevention without impeding his/her independence was challenging. She stated, as far as she knew, there had been no mention of the threshold/transitional area in the doorways and changes in flooring being a challenge for Resident #13 was mentioned to the OT. She stated OT #1 was on maternity leave and unavailable for interview.
In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/02/2023 at 3:30 PM, she stated she had provided Resident #13 with a reacher, an additional waste can in his/her room near the bed and had also spoken to maintenance about the flooring in the threshold/transitional spaces in Resident #13's room. She stated the safety of the residents was a team effort and was every staff member's responsibility.
In an interview on 12/02/2023 at 4:15 PM with the Director of Maintenance (DM), he stated he was not aware of any work orders for room modifications in Resident #13's room. He further stated the facility planned to change the carpet in the halls due to wear, but he was not aware of any plans for any replacement of flooring from carpet to tile in any resident's room.
3. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed the facility admitted him/her on 04/08/2022, with diagnoses which included dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance; anxiety disorder, unspecified; and morbid (severe) obesity due to excessive calories.
Review of Resident #17's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 01/04/2023, revealed the facility assessed the resident as severely cognitively impaired, as evidenced by the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one (1) of fifteen (15). Continued review of the MDS Assessment, Section GG, Activities of Daily Living, revealed the facility assessed Resident #17 to require extensive assistance of two (2) staff for toilet transferring and using the Hoyer lift (brand of a full body mechanical lift) and assistance of two (2) staff members for transferring from bed to wheelchair.
Review of Resident #17's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCC), dated 12/29/2022, revealed the facility had care planned the resident as at risk for falls related to decreased mobility, episodes of incontinence, cognitive deficits, and requiring assistance of two (2) with transfers. Continued review revealed interventions which included total assistance of two (2) staff members; ensure a safe environment free of clutter: call light was accessible whether in bed or in a chair; and notify Physician and family as needed. Continued review revealed on 01/04/2023, the resident required a mechanical lift for transfer from the bed to chair and the assistance of two (2) with Sara lift (a sit-to-stand mechanical lift) for toilet transfer. Further review of the care plan revealed the facility also care planned Resident #17 to require total assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) related to decreased mobility, incontinence, and dementia.
Review of the facility's policy titled, Mechanical Lift, no date, revealed the facility required two (2) people in attendance for the use of all mechanical lifts.
Observation of Resident #17 on 12/02/2023 at 10:10 AM, revealed the resident sitting in his/her wheelchair with the legs extended outward and sitting next to his/her spouse, Resident #32, in the common area next to the fireplace. Interview with Resident #17 was not possible due to his/her disease process, but Resident #32 provided information regarding the accident. Resident #32 stated, I have gotten [two (2)] different stories on the incident, one being that the fracture occurred before the fall and the other being the fracture occurred after the fall. [He/she] is doing fine now.
Review of Resident #17's Progress Note dated 01/08/2023 at 7:43 PM and signed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #22, revealed Resident #17 presented with a 2.5 centimeter (cm) by 5 cm dark purple bruise to the left ankle, with edema, redness, warmth to the area as well as painful to touch. State Trained Nurse Aide (STNA) #38 reported the resident was lowered to the floor in the bathroom on the first shift, after losing her/his strength while transferring. Per the note, Resident #17 was unable to recall any injuries, and the resident was up in the wheelchair with no complaints at dinner time. The note stated the physician was notified and awaiting a response.
Review of Resident #17's Post Fall Observation with Fall Risk Observation Report, dated 01/08/2023 and initiated by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20, revealed at 2:00 PM, Resident #17 was b[TRUNCATED]
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for falls for two (2) residents (Residents #13 and #17). The facility also failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered care plan to ensure adequate supervision was provided for one (1) resident (Resident #115). Additionally, the facility failed to develop/implement a person-centered care plan to ensure exit seeking behaviors were identified and adequate interventions were put in place for Residents #114 and #113. The number of sampled residents was sixty-nine (69).
1. Resident #13 had documented falls on 06/04/2022 (no injury), 06/17/2022 (left hip fracture), 08/22/2022 (no injury), 11/10/2022 (right thumb fracture), and 11/28/2022 (small abrasion to left elbow, minor swelling to the left forehead and redness to the lower back) and no fall interventions had been added to the fall care plan for any of the falls.
2. On 01/08/2023, a State Trained Nurse Aide (STNA) transferred Resident #17, while using a stand-pivot lift. The facility reported the resident lost strength in his/her legs, and the STNA lowered the resident to the floor. On 01/10/2023 the resident was sent to the Emergency Department (ED) after a mobile x-ray showed the resident had a fracture to the left ankle. The resident was care planned for an extensive assistance of two (2) staff for transfers and toileting assistance.
3. Observation on 12/01/2023 at 1:22 PM, revealed Resident #115 opened a keypad alarmed door triggering the alarm. Staff interviews revealed they had concerns about Resident #115 getting out of the facility prior to that, so they watched him/her more. Staff stated they reported to management their concerns about Resident #115. However, the resident was not identified as an elopement risk, and the facility did not care plan the resident as a risk until after the 12/01/2023 incident.
Review of Resident #115's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP), initiated 11/28/2023, revealed the facility failed to care plan the resident for his/her desire to smoke and therefore did not have interventions in place to assist the resident. Additionally, the resident was not care planned for his/her ability to ambulate independently in the wheelchair and the ability to open doors and exit the facility.
4. Observation of Resident #114's room on two (2) different dates revealed the resident had several bags by his/her doorway. Interview with staff revealed the resident packed his/her bags every time staff tried to unpack his/her property. Staff stated the resident talked daily about wanting to leave to be with his/her spouse, about being picked up, and about not wanting to be at the facility. Additional interview with staff revealed staff believed the resident had the ability and the desire to leave the facility.
Review of Resident #114's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP), initiated on 11/09/2023, revealed the facility failed to identify the resident's behaviors of packing up his/her property and constantly talking about leaving the facility.
5. Observation of Resident #113 on 11/30/2023 at 11:00 AM in Building #1, revealed the resident moved quickly about the facility with the use of a walker for balance. The resident carried a small bag around with his/her hands at the walker. The resident sat down at the common area table, unpacked and repacked the bag, and then got up and moved around the facility.
In an interview with Resident #113's son on 11/30/2023 at 1:00 PM, he stated mobility was not a concern for Resident #113. He explained the resident was very mobile with the walker, and he believed the resident would be able to leave the facility on his/her own accord.
Review of Resident #113's CCP, initiated 11/22/2023, revealed the resident required the assistance of one (1) staff member for ambulation. The facility failed to properly develop the care plan to show the resident's ability to ambulate independently with the use of a walker.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP), revised 05/01/2022, revealed it was the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Additional review of the policy revealed the CCP would be reviewed and revised by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) after each comprehensive and quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. It stated the identified objectives would be utilized to monitor the resident's progress and that alternate interventions would be documented as needed. Per the policy, the facility would attempt to alternate methods of refusal of treatment and services and document such attempts in the clinical record, including discussions with the resident and/or resident representative.
Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Management, undated, revealed care and assistance would be provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable level of well-being, which included minimizing the risk of falls. Individual resident needs for staff assistance and equipment during toileting, transfer, ambulation, and all activities of daily living would be assessed and addressed as appropriate via the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process to determine if the resident was at risk (for falls) and implement interventions to minimize the risk of falls. The plan of care would be reviewed and revised to include new interventions, if appropriate, in order to minimize the risk of falls. Per the policy, the Fall Committee would review each resident who had fallen as well as the interventions that were in place to minimize the risk of falls. Further review revealed this committee would look at and try to determine the root cause of the fall.
1. a. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/03/2021 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (involuntary, erratic writhing movements of the face, arms, legs, or trunk), epilepsy, spondylosis (age related wear and tear of the spinal disks), and history of multiple fractures of the pelvis with unstable disruption of the pelvic ring.
Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 04/29/2022, revealed a BIMS' score of fourteen (14) of fifteen (15), indicating no cognitive impairment.
Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 06/04/2022 at 2:00 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #19, revealed Resident #13 had been found on the bathroom floor sitting in an upright position. Per the note, Resident #13 stated he/she was trying to get on the toilet, but the wheelchair had rolled out from underneath him/her. LPN #19 documented she had observed the wheelchair wheels were not in the locked position. Further, Resident #13 stated he/she his/her head on the floor, and his/her right arm was hurting. LPN #19 documented she performed neurological checks on Resident #13, and the resident was able to make his/her needs known, with no signs of acute distress. Per the note, LPN #19 educated Resident #13 to use the call light to call for assistance, but Resident #13 refused.
Review of Resident #13's Post Fall Observation Report, dated 06/04/2022 at 10:02 PM, revealed LPN #19 had documented Resident #13 was found in the restroom sitting in an upright position after attempting to self-transfer from the wheelchair in response to bladder/bowel urgency (needing to use the restroom). Resident #13 was documented as having no history of falls but also as having one (1) or two (2) falls within the last three (3) months. The facility assessed Resident #13 to be alert and oriented to person, place, and time and had been educated to use the call light for assistance and to make sure the wheelchair was locked. Resident #13's gait and balance were assessed as normal. Continued review revealed the facility assessed Resident #13 to be continent of bowel and bladder but needed assistance with toileting. Resident #13's factors contributing to falls were identified as Neuromuscular/Functional to include a decline in functional status, Parkinson's Disease, and seizure disorder. Resident #13's Fall Risk Score was determined to be a ten (10), which indicated average risk for falls.
Review of Resident #13's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP), started on 12/03/2021, revealed Resident #13 was documented as being at risk for falls related to weakness, limited mobility, tremors, medication use, impulsiveness, history of falls, and diagnoses of Parkinson's and Epilepsy. Resident #13's documented goal specified fall prevention approaches would help minimize the fall risk. Resident #13's documented interventions included to remind Resident #13 to ask for help rather than trying to get up alone; to call for assistance before attempting to transfer, ambulate, or going to the bathroom; for staff to be aware that some of Resident #13's medications might increase the risk of falls; and to check on Resident #13 regularly to assure safety and that his/her needs were met.
However, review of Resident #13's CCP started on 12/03/2021 and reviewed on 12/02/2023, revealed no intervention had been added to the Fall care plan for the 06/04/2022 fall.
Attempts were made to interview LPN #19 on 11/29/2023 at 2:30 PM and 11/30/2023 at 8:30 AM with no answer or return call.
b. Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 06/17/2022 at 3:49 PM by LPN #20, revealed she heard screaming from Resident #13's room and found the resident lying in the doorway of his/her room. LPN #20 documented Resident #13 stated he/she tried to fix his/her wheelchair, fell, and screamed my hip is broken. LPN #20 documented she placed a pillow under Resident #13's head, assessed him/her, called 911, notified the physician, called report to the hospital, and notified Resident #13's daughter he/she was sent to the emergency room (ER).
Review of Resident #13's Post Fall Risk Observation Report, dated 06/17/2022 at 3:39 PM, revealed LPN #20 documented she heard screaming from Resident #13's room, and upon entering Resident #13's room, she found the resident lying in the inside doorway of his/her room and screaming he/she had broken his/her hip and the pain was terrible. LPN #20 documented Resident #13 stated he/she was standing up fixing the seat of his/her wheelchair when he/she fell. The LPN documented the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER). Per the report, the resident was assessed with a history of falls both prior to and since admission to the facility and to have had three (3) or more falls within the last three (3) months. Resident #13's contributing factors were assessed as Neuromuscular/Functional to include Parkinson's. Resident #13's Fall Risk Score was determined to be ten (10), with any score between zero and ten (0-10) indicating an average fall risk. Review of the evaluation notes section revealed Resident #13 was standing in his/her room fixing the wheelchair cushion, lost his/her balance, and fell to the floor.
Review of Resident #13's CCP dated as started on 12/03/2021, revealed no intervention had been added to the Fall Care Plan for the 06/17/2022 fall.
In a phone interview on 12/02/2023 at 7:01 PM with LPN #20, she stated that not all floor staff had access to update residents' care plans and in that case, the Unit Manager (UM) or the Director of Nursing (DON) would update the resident's care plan and add an intervention after a fall. She further stated care plans were reviewed in daily IDT meetings and the IDT members included the UM, DON, Social Services, Activities, MDS, Dietary, and Therapy. She further stated it was important for the resident's care plan to be up to date so each staff member knew the proper protocol for caring for the resident as each resident was different, and the care plan guided staff. LPN #20 further stated the care plan outlined State Trained Nurse Aide (STNA) resident care tasks which were reflected on the STNA Kardex. The STNA Kardex was visible on the tablets the STNA's charted on, and a printed copy was kept in a binder at the nurse's station for reference.
Review of Resident #13's Quarterly MDS Assessment, Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 08/16/2022 revealed a BIMS' score of thirteen (13) of fifteen (15), which indicated no cognitive impairment.
c. Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 08/22/2022 at 12:15 PM by LPN #20, revealed she had been called to Resident #13's room by a STNA, and the resident was lying on the floor beside the bed on the bathroom side. She further documented Resident #13 had been sitting on the side of the bed on a draw sheet eating lunch, and his/her Parkinson movements of shaking had increased that day causing him/her to slide off the side of the bed. The note stated the resident denied pain or injury.
Review of Resident #13's Post Fall Observation Report, dated 08/22/2022 at 12:49 PM, revealed LPN #20 had documented Resident #13 was eating lunch in bed and had been having extreme movements related to his/her Parkinson's diagnosis. Resident #13 had been sitting on a draw pad and slid off the side of the bed and landed on the floor closest to the bathroom. The report stated no injury or complaints of pain had been reported. Resident #13 had been assessed to have a history of falls both prior to and since admission to the facility and to have had three (3) or more falls within the last three (3) months. Resident #13's contributing factors were assessed as Neuromuscular/Functional to include Parkinson's, Psychiatric/Cognitive, and Orthopedic. Resident #13's Fall Risk Score was determined to be eighteen (18), with any score greater than ten (10) indicating a high fall risk.
Review of Resident #13's CCP revealed no intervention had been added to the Fall Care Plan for the 08/22/2022 fall.
d. Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 11/10/2022 at 1:22 PM by LPN #18, revealed she was called to Resident #13's room by staff, and the resident was noted to be lying parallel to the left side of the bed on the floor closest to the window. Resident #13 stated he/she was trying to make the bed on his/her own while sitting up in the wheelchair, the front wheel of the wheelchair got caught on something, and he/she fell out of the wheelchair. The facility assessed Resident #13 for pain and injury at that time and neither were found. Then, at approximately 3:00 PM, swelling and bruising were noted at the right side of Resident #13's hand near the thumb. The note stated the physician had been notified, and an X-ray had been ordered.
Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 11/10/2022 at 7:48 PM by LPN #22, revealed she had received the X-ray results which showed a fracture of Resident #13's right thumb. LPN #22 documented Resident #13's daughter stated her parent was stubborn and did what he/she wanted to do.
Review of Resident #13's Medical Record revealed a Post Fall Observation Report had not been completed.
Review of Resident #13's CCP revealed no intervention had been added to the Fall Care Plan for the 11/10/2022 fall.
In a phone interview on 12/02/2023 at 2:16 PM with LPN #18, she stated she worked at the facility on an as needed basis and had not been trained on doing care plans. She further stated she did not know how interventions for a resident's care plan were decided upon and thought there was a binder available with resident care information in it, but she received most of the resident information in nurse-to-nurse report.
Review of Resident #13's Quarterly MDS Assessment Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 11/14/2022, revealed a BIMS' score of thirteen (13) of fifteen (15), which indicated no cognitive impairment.
e. Review of Resident #13's Progress Note dated 11/28/2022 at 4:50 PM by Registered Nurse (RN) #6, revealed Resident #13 had been heard by staff yelling for help. RN #6 documented she observed the resident on his/her back on the shower stall floor directly across from the toilet in the resident's bathroom. The RN stated Resident #13 stated he/she fell while attempting to self-transfer from the toilet to the wheelchair. Per the note, a small abrasion to the left elbow, minor swelling to the left forehead, and redness to the lower back were noted.
Review of Resident #13's Post Fall Observation Report, dated 11/28/2022 at 4:50 PM, revealed RN #6 observed Resident #13 on the bathroom floor on his/her back in the shower stall directly across from the toilet. Per the report, Resident #13 stated he/she had transferred himself/herself onto the toilet from the wheelchair and was transferring back to the wheelchair when he/she fell. Per the report, the facility assessed Resident #13 to have a history of falls since admission and in the last thirty (30) days. Resident #13's contributing factors were assessed as Neuromuscular/Functional to include Parkinson's, and Orthopedic. Resident #13's Fall Risk Score was determined to be fifteen (15), with any score greater than ten (10) indicating a high fall risk.
Review of Resident #13's CCP revealed no intervention had been added to the Fall care plan for the 11/28/2022 fall.
Attempts were made to interview RN #6 on 11/29/2023 at 12:30 PM and 11/30/2023 at 9:30 AM with no answer or return call.
In an interview on 12/01/2023 at 9:30 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9, he stated he was currently filling in as the Unit Manager. LPN #9 stated Resident #13 was very impulsive and did not have great safety judgment/awareness. He further stated Resident #13 also had obsessive compulsive disorder and was constantly picking things off the floor like lint and tissue. He stated even though staff encouraged Resident #13 to call for assist, he/she did not always listen. LPN #9 stated it was his expectation that all falls would have an accompanying fall observation sheet and care plan interventions would be placed immediately based on what happened with the resident at the time. LPN #9 further stated some floor nurses updated care plans and some did not. He stated Unit Managers and the DON also put interventions in and would be responsible for making sure an intervention was placed during IDT review.
In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/04/2023 at 9:26 AM, she stated she was not employed at the facility during the time of Resident #13's falls, but interventions for each fall should have been on the care plan.
The State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor, on 12/14/2023 at 2:40 PM via email to the DON, requested a description of the Falls Committee duties, members, frequency of meetings, and any dates Resident #13's falls were reviewed. However, this was not provided.
In a phone interview on 12/05/2023 at 10:20 AM with the MDS Coordinator #1 (MDS #1), she stated for Resident #13, the UM or DON would have updated the care plan. MDS #1 stated if she had noted any absence of interventions during her review she would have reached out to leadership.
In an interview on 12/05/2023 at 10:35 AM with MDS #2, she stated, when asked about Resident #13 and the lack of documented interventions from 12/16/2021 to 02/02/2023, MDS #2 stated she was not sure why.
In a phone interview on 12/13/2023 at 12:56 PM with Nurse Manager #1/Quality Program/Improvement Manager, she stated she had been at the facility for three (3) years, but she was not reviewing falls from 06/01/2022 to 11/28/2022, the time Resident #13 was missing fall interventions. She stated another UM who no longer worked at the facility was reviewing falls at that time.
In an interview on 12/13/2023 at 10:31 AM with the Administrator, she stated, regarding Resident #13, the only thing she could speak about was the DON said there was an intervention on the resident's care plan for every fall. She stated she did not question this, but it was possible that she had misunderstood.
2. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/08/2022, with diagnoses of dementia unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance; anxiety disorder, and morbid obesity.
Review of Resident #17's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/30/2022, revealed the facility assessed Resident #17 to have a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of one (1) of fifteen (15), which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Another assessment, dated 12/29/2022, revealed the facility assessed Resident #17's Activities for Daily Living (ADL) status as requiring assist of two (2) with bed to chair/chair to bed transfers with mechanical lift, and assist of two (2) without mechanical lift to transfer to/from toilet.
Review of Resident #17's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 04/11/2022, revealed the facility identified the resident as a fall risk due to decreased mobility, episodes of incontinence, cognitive deficits, and medication use with potential for adverse effects and diagnoses. The CCP was amended on 12/29/2022 to assist of two (2) without mechanical lift when transferring from toilet to wheelchair. Review of the facility's care plan transfer status dated 12/29/2022 for Resident #17, revealed the resident required the assistance of two (2) with bed to chair/chair to bed transfers with mechanical lift, assist of two (2) without mechanical lift to transfer to/from toilet.
Review of Section GG Tool (Functional Abilities and Goals) of Resident #17's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 01/04/2023, revealed the facility assessed the resident was dependent and required the assistance of two (2) or more helpers to complete a toilet transfer (the ability to get on and off a toilet or commode).
Review of the facility's Post Fall Observation with Fall Risk Observation Report, dated 01/08/2023 at 2:00 PM, revealed Resident #17 was being transferred from the toilet to the wheelchair when his/her legs gave out, and he/she was lowered to the floor. Additional staff and the nurse were called to the room to help get the resident off the floor to the wheelchair. Per the report, the resident was a Sara (sit-to-stand) lift for transfers other than toilet transfers. Continued review revealed the resident required assist of two (2) + with/without device for the resident's usual ambulatory status. The report stated the resident was stabilized for toilet use with the assistance of two (2) staff. Continued review revealed the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) dated 01/08/2023, revealed Resident #17 was transferred assisted by one (1) staff member. Internal risk factors identified included decreased range of motion, unsteady gait, forgetful, displayed poor safety awareness, behavior issues, poor judgement, bowel or bladder incontinence, recent decline in ADL functional status. Per the report, the resident's fall history included falls prior to admission and falls since admission; his/her mental state was intermittent confusion, poor recall-judgment-safety awareness. Per the report, the resident's fall risk score was seventeen (17), where greater than ten (10) indicated a high fall risk.
Review of Resident #17's Progress Note dated 01/08/2023 at 7:43 PM by LPN #20, revealed the resident presented with a 2.5 centimeter (cm) by 5 cm dark purple bruise to the left ankle. The note stated the left ankle had edema, redness, warmth to the area, and was painful to touch. Per the note, the resident was unable to recall any injuries and was usually mildly confused and anxious.
Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed radiology results from a mobile left ankle X-ray taken on 01/09/2023 at 5:36 PM, revealed acute bimalleolar ankle fracture (where tibia and fibula join at the ankle) with medial ankle mortise widening.
Review of Resident #17's Progress Note dated 01/10/2023 at 11:00 AM completed by LPN #20, revealed the resident was transported to the ER (Emergency Room) related to a fracture in the left ankle.
Review of the Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed Resident #17 was admitted for left ankle fracture. Continued review of the summary revealed the resident underwent surgery for the left ankle fracture (required a plate and screws to stabilize both leg bones and ankle) on 01/11/2023. Further review revealed Resident #17 was discharged and returned to the facility on [DATE].
In a telephone interview on 12/02/2023 at 1:16 PM, STNA #35 stated she responded to a call from STNA #38 on 01/08/2023 at 1:27 PM. STNA #35 stated she found Resident #17 on the floor with STNA #38 next to him/her. STNA #35 stated she along with a nurse (STNA #35 could not recall nurse's name since she was no longer employed at facility) assisted Resident #17 to sit in the wheelchair. STNA stated Resident #17 was in pain when he/she was assisted into the wheelchair.3. Observation on 12/01/2023 at 1:22 PM, revealed an alarm sounded and upon further observation there was a staff member and Resident #115 in his/her wheelchair halfway in the door. The staff member pulled the resident back into the facility. The staff member was identified as Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #1. PTA #1 made the statement, I do not even know how the resident got the door open. Further observation revealed, at the same time, another staff member, identified as State Trained Nurse Aide (STNA) #13, arrived and explained the door opened if you pulled on it for fifteen (15) seconds, and the door unlocked. STNA #13 asked what happened, and PTA #1 said the resident got out the door. PTA #1 pulled the door for fifteen (15) seconds, and the door let off a beep, beep, beep sound. Once it got to fifteen (15) seconds the door sounded a solid beep until the door was closed and the keypad was reset.
Observation of Resident #115 on 12/01/2023 at 1:30 PM, revealed he/she explained to PTA #1, he/she wanted to go out to smoke. A few minutes later the resident was at the table in the common area and observed to be crying. Further observation revealed staff talked with the resident and explained he/she was not in any trouble, and one (1) staff hugged the resident to comfort him/her, and the resident smiled.
Observation on 12/01/2023 at 1:45 PM, revealed PTA #1 demonstrated exactly what she saw with Resident #115. She placed an empty wheelchair through the door, halfway through the door opening, and it was centered perfectly in the door frame. She showed how she held the door with her back, and then she pushed the resident all the way outside and allowed the door to close behind her. She turned off the alarm.
Review of Resident #115's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident for short-term rehabilitation on 11/15/2023 with diagnoses of surgical amputation on 11/15/2023, dementia, nicotine dependence, and transient ischemic attack (TIA) history.
Review of Resident #115's Baseline Care Plan Summary completed on 11/15/2023 revealed the resident required the assistance of two (2) staff for all activities of daily living (ADL).
Review of Resident #115's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) initiated 11/28/2023, revealed the facility failed to care plan the resident for his/her desire to smoke and therefore did not have interventions in place to assist the resident. Additionally, the resident was not care planned for his/her ability to ambulate independently in the wheelchair and ability to open doors and exit the facility.
Review of Resident #115's CCP established 11/16/2023 revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to diagnoses and cognitive deficit. Staff were to check on the resident regularly to ensure he/she was safe and his/her needs were met. The facility care planned the resident for cognitive impairment and dementia, on 11/16/2023, with interventions to encourage the resident to make choices by keeping him/her informed and giving the resident options. Also, to cue the resident and give reminders as needed. Further review revealed the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the resident's desire to smoke and his/her ability to elope, until after the incident on 12/01/2023.
Review of Resident #115's Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified the resident as a current smoker, which was not addressed in the resident's care plan.
On 12/01/2023 at 1:45 PM the DON entered Building #1 and informed the State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor that Resident #115 was interviewed, and she said the resident did not want to go home, the resident just wanted to go out to smoke. The DON stated the resident told her he/she had not smoked in years.
4. Observation of Resident #114's room, on 11/30/2023 at 10:00 AM; 11/30/2023 at 2:30 PM; and 12/01/2023 at 11:00 AM, revealed all the resident's belongings were packed up in five (5) bags and placed by the door.
Review of Resident #114's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), Minimum Data Set (MDS) section, revealed no documented MDS Assessment was present.
Review of Resident #114's History and Physical completed on 11/15/2023 by the resident's Primary Care Physician (PCP), revealed the facility admitted the resident on 11/08/2023 with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, lumbar spinal stenosis, and bipolar disorder.
Review of Resident #114's Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a lot of difficulty turning in the bed, standing up from a chair using the arms for support, moving from bed to chair, and required assistance with wheelchair mobility. The plan was for the resident to increase his/her strength through therapy to be able to perform these tasks with little assistance.
Review of Resident #114's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) established on 11/09/2023, revealed the facility completed a problem area for cognitive loss/dementia. However, review of the resident's diagnoses list, revealed the resident did not have a dementia diagnosis.
Review of Resident #114's CCP initiated on 11/09/2023, revealed the facility failed to identify the resident's behaviors of packing up his/her property and constantly talking about leaving the facility.
In an interview with State Trained Nurse Aide (STNA) #18 on 11/30/2023 at 10:00 AM, she explained Resident #114 had a history of packing up his/her belongings after staff unpacked them to get the resident settled. STNA #18 stated the resident would state he/she was not staying at the facility and was leaving the next day. However, at this time, there was no discharge plan set up. STNA #18 said this type of behavior should have been care planned to ensure all staff was alert and aware and had interventions to try to help change the resident's behavior. STNA #18 said the care plan should always be followed to ensure residents got the best care possible. NURSE INTERVIEW?
5. Observation on 11/30/2023 at 1:00 PM, revealed Resident #113 moving around the common area with his/her walker. The resident was very quick and moved around unassisted by staff. The resident sat at the common area table and unpacked a small bag he/she carried around, packed the bag back up, and moved about the facility again.
Observation of Resident #113 and the resident's son on 12/01/2023 at 10:50 AM, revealed they were seated side by side, holding on to each other. The man said he was the resident's son. The State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor tried to talk with the son, but every time a question was directed to him the resident would say, don't talk to her, don't tell her anything, just listen to what she is saying and don't tell her anything, it will just cause all kinds of problems, remember what I told you.
Observation on 12/01/2023 at 2:00 PM, revealed Resident #113 had on a yellow coat and moved about the facility in the common area. The resident moved quickly about unassisted by staff but used a walker, more for balance then for mobility.
Review of Resident #113's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on 11/21/20[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's Investigation Report, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dig...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's Investigation Report, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (1) of sixty-nine (69) sampled residents (Resident #21).
The facility reported that when State Trained Nurse Aide (STNA) #32 was providing care for Resident #21, she was rough, became frustrated, and cursed in front of him/her. Resident #21 reported to STNA #33 that STNA #32's behavior was mean and hurt his/her feelings.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 02/02/2022, revealed residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity. The policy also stated the facility must care for each resident in a way that promoted enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality.
Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/16/2022 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's; psychotic disturbance; mood disturbance; and anxiety.
Review of Resident #21's Admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 11/14/2022, revealed a BIMS' score of six (6) of fifteen (15), which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
Review of Resident #21's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 08/04/2022, revealed he/she had difficulty with memory and decision making. Interventions included: providing resident cues and reminders as needed and offering him/her options. Further review revealed Resident #21's care plan was updated on 11/30/2022 to include mood and behavior concerns. Interventions implemented included: observation of Resident #21 for signs of declining mood and psychosocial strengths; assessment for causes in declining mood and psychosocial strengths; and assistance and support as appropriate.
Review of the facility's Investigative Report, dated 12/08/2022, revealed, on 12/02/2023, STNA #11 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14 that STNA #32 was rough with Resident #21's care and when unable to complete the attempted task, became frustrated and cursed in front of the resident. Per the report, STNA #32 was suspended pending an investigation. The report stated LPN #14 performed a head-to-toe assessment which included a skin assessment on Resident #21 that revealed no signs of injury. Statements were obtained from on duty staff at the time of the incident, and Resident #21's physician and family were notified. Per the report, after review of the information obtained during the investigation, the facility concluded although the behavior of STNA #32 was inappropriate, it did not rise to the level of abuse. The report stated STNA #32's behavior did not meet the facility's minimum expectations; and therefore, she was terminated on 12/08/2022.
Review of the facility's Investigative Report, dated 12/08/2022 revealed STNA #24's witness statement documented she was on duty the day of the alleged incident, she was in Resident #21's room, and witnessed the actions of STNA #32. Per the statement, STNA #24 documented STNA #32's language was inappropriate in front of the resident, and STNA #24 asked STNA #32 to leave the room. The statement documented STNA #24 then reported STNA #32's language to the nurse on duty and called another STNA to assist her with the resident. The witness statement documented Resident #21 was clearly troubled.
Review of STNA #33's witness statement, dated 12/03/2022, revealed Resident #21 voiced to STNA #33 that his/her feelings were hurt by the behavior of STNA #32.
Review of Resident #21's skin assessment, dated 12/03/2022, revealed no skin changes or new skin concerns.
During an interview with Resident #21's spouse on 11/30/2023 at 1:14 PM, he/she stated the care at the facility was great. He/she said because of his/her spouse's Alzheimer's and dementia, the resident did not like to be touched and yelled out even if someone barely touched him/her. The spouse stated Resident #21 did not walk by himself/herself but was mobile around the unit in his/her wheelchair. Resident #21's spouse stated the staff was very good with the resident. Resident #21's spouse stated that he/she could not remember for sure that the facility called him/her regarding the incident with STNA #32.
During an interview with STNA #11 on 11/29/2023 at 8:39 PM, she stated she had worked at the facility for a year. She stated her initial orientation included both dementia care and abuse training. She further stated continuing education on both dementia and abuse was provided multiple times throughout the year. STNA #11 stated the morning of the alleged incident, STNA #32 was asleep in the television area and became irritated because she had to get Resident #21 up for his/her daily weight. STNA #11 stated that STNA #32 said, I don't want to deal with [him/her] today. STNA #11 stated when they went to provide care to Resident #21, STNA #32 was rough and tried to rush the resident. The STNA stated when Resident #21 was not able to move quickly enough, STNA #32 became more agitated and said, Fuck it! I don't have time for this shit! STNA #11 stated she reported the behavior to LPN #14. STNA #11 stated STNA #32 was suspended immediately and ultimately terminated.
During an interview with STNA #24 on 11/30/2023 at 1:21 PM, she stated she was a staff employee and had worked at the facility for two (2) years. She said she did recall the incident with Resident #21. STNA #24 stated the resident was very easily agitated and just required a soft touch. She further stated it was her opinion the abrasiveness of STNA #32's approach triggered the situation.
The State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor attempted to reach STNA #23 on 11/30/2023 at 1:19 PM, STNA #32 on 12/01/2023 at 10:47 AM, and STNA #33 on 12/01/2023 at 1:19 PM for interview. Voicemail messages were left for all three (3) STNA's. However, none of the three (3) STNA's responded to the messages.
During an interview with the Administrator on 11/30/2023 at 2:13 PM, she stated STNA #32 was with an agency and had been placed on the facility's do not return list. She stated even though the facility did not consider STNA #32's behavior abusive because her language was not directed at Resident #21, her behavior was unacceptable per their facility standards.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure opened and in-use medications were labeled with the opened date and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure opened and in-use medications were labeled with the opened date and were not expired on one (1) of four (4) medication carts and in one (1) of four (4) medication rooms.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, undated, revealed medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. Further review revealed outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that were cracked, soiled, or without secure closures were immediately removed from stock and disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. Additional review revealed medication storage conditions were monitored on a monthly basis and corrective action taken if problems were identified.
Review of audits performed by Pharmacy Technician #2, dated 09/21/2023, 10/19/2023, and 11/16/2023, revealed no out-of-date medications were found.
Review of the facility's medication cart and medication room audits, undated, on 12/15/2023 at 10:45 AM revealed audit areas were assessed with marking Satisfactory, Needs Improvement, Not Applicable, or Not Observed. Further review revealed documentation of one (1) instance of the presence of an expired medication and one (1) instance of an undated insulin vial.
Observation of the 400 Unit Medication Storage Room refrigerator on 11/29/2023 at 8:13 AM, revealed one (1) bottle of UTIStat Oral Supplement (used to prevent and manage urinary tract infections), opened but not labeled, for an individual resident, with an expiration date of 2022.
Observation of the 400 Unit Medication Cart on 11/29/2023 at 8:32 AM, revealed one (1) bottle of ProStat Liquid Protein supplement, opened and labeled for Resident #24, with an opened date of 09/13/2023 and an expiration date of 09/23/2023. Continued observation revealed Ipratropium Bromide 0.5 milligrams (mg)/Albuterol 3.0 mg nebulizer medication in an opened packaging with no date and not in a package labeled for the specific resident; Albuterol Sulfate, 0.083%, nebulizer medication, twenty (20) packages, loose in the cart with no label; and Xiidra PF 5%, single use only, for topical application to the eye, labeled for Resident #20, in packaging that was torn open.
During interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 11/29/2023 at 8:35 AM, he stated the Unit Manager (UM) was typically responsible for the medication cart and storage audits, but the unit currently did not have a UM. He stated he did not know who was now responsible for UM duties. LPN #1 stated the Pharmacy also conducted medication cart audits but he did not know the frequency or schedule. He stated medications should be discarded by the expiration date because those drugs might not be effective and even be harmful.
During interview with LPN #7 on 12/01/2023 at 3:50 PM, she stated nurses and KMAs were all responsible to audit their own medication carts and medication rooms for expired medications. She stated Pharmacy did audits on the carts sometimes but she was not sure of the frequency. She also stated expiration dates were important as the medication might be ineffective or possibly lead to medication errors. She stated if a staff member found an expired medication, he/she should remove it from the cart, notify the physician, and order a replacement.
During interview with the Quality Program Manager on 12/03/2023 at 1:27 PM, she stated KMAs and nurses audited the carts, and Pharmacy also audited the carts and storage rooms monthly. She stated it was important because for the rehabilitation units, there could be multiple medication changes. She stated the staff needed to keep up with that to prevent medication errors and overall for patient safety as well as to reduce clutter. She stated audits also served to remove out of date medications and this was important because expired medications might be less effective.
During interview with Pharmacy Technician #1 on 12/04/2023 at 9:03 AM, she stated the Pharmacy sent somebody monthly to conduct audits, and the most recent audit at the facility was on 11/16/2023. She also stated she thought the audit was for all the medication carts and medication rooms.
During interview with Pharmacy Technician #1 on 12/04/2023 at 9:15 AM, she stated the Pharmacist audited all the medication carts and rooms monthly, and the treatment carts every three to four (3-4) months. She stated the Pharmacist reported to the facility anything found that was expired or out of compliance. She further stated the Pharmacist sent a report to the Pharmacy of any medication that was out of date or out of compliance so that it could be replenished.
During interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/04/2023 at 9:58 AM, she stated it was a night shift responsibility to check the medication carts and medication rooms. She stated all nurses knew if they opened a medication, they were responsible to date it and not to use a medication that was expired. She stated it was really all the nurses' responsibility to audit carts, a collaborative effort. She also stated if there was an expired medication, someone just failed to see and remove it.
During interview with the Administrator on 12/13/2023 at 10:50 AM, she stated Pharmacy did audits in the facility monthly. She further stated the staff did audits at least monthly, per the annual Quality Assurance (QA) plan. She stated management staff conducted audits as well by the night shift supervisor. The Administrator stated nurses should also look when administering medications for expired medications and biologicals. She stated it was important to do this because medications past the expiration date could lose potency and not be as effective.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guideli...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for eleven (11) of sixty-nine (69) sampled residents (Residents #3, #16, #41, #44, #47, #48, #109, #111, #118, #119 and #560).
The eleven (11) residents had either wounds and/or indwelling devices. However, neither resident had been placed in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as recommended by the CDC, CMS and the facility's policy.
The findings include:
Review of the CDC National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infection Diseases presentation, titled Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug Resistant Organisms, dated 07/12/2022, revealed EBP were indicated for nursing home residents with any of the following:
- Infection or colonization with an MDRO when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply
- Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices.
Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last revised 07/05/2022, revealed it was the policy of the facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for preventing transmission of novel or targeted multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Continued review revealed EBP were defined as the use of gown and gloves for certain residents during specific high-contact resident care activities that have been found to increase risk for transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Further review revealed clear signage was to be posted on the door or wall outside of the resident's room indicating the type of precautions, required personal protective equipment (PPE), and the high-contact resident care activities that required the use of gown and gloves. Additional review revealed nursing staff might place residents with certain conditions or devices on EBPs empirically while awaiting physician orders, and an order for EBP was to be obtained for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g. central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy) regardless of MDRO colonization status.
During an entrance interview with the Administrator on 11/27/2023 at 10:30 AM, she stated they had no residents or staff with COVID infections currently.
During initial screenings on 11/27/2023 at 10:50 AM, no residents were observed on the 100, 200, 300 and 400 units with any Transmission Based Precautions (TBP).
Review of the facility's Roster Matrix on 11/27/2023 at 4:00 PM, revealed no documentation of residents with infections requiring TBP.
1. Medical record review revealed the facility readmitted Resident #3 on 11/24/2023, with diagnoses that included Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and retention of urine. Further record review revealed Resident #3 was noted to have an indwelling catheter in place.
2. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #16 on 04/28/2021, with diagnoses that included Neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, and other specified disorders of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Continued record review revealed Resident #16 had a mid-lower back wound for which he/she was currently receiving treatment.
3. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #41 on 11/21/2023 with diagnoses that included fracture of the right proximal femur, BPH with urinary retention and nutritional deficiency. Further record review revealed Resident #41 had a wound to the coccyx and an indwelling urinary catheter in place.
4. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #44 on 10/31/2023, with diagnoses that included Osteomyelitis of the left hip, status post (s/p) surgical placement of an antibiotic spacer; and obstructive and reflux uropathy with retention of urine. Continued record review revealed Resident #44 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place which had been in place at the time of admission.
5. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #47 on 11/06/2023, with diagnoses which included dysphagia following cerebral infarction and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Further review revealed Resident #47 had orders for palliative care; an indwelling urinary catheter; as well as a gastrostomy tube (GT) for feeding.
6. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #48 on 10/13/2023, with diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy, dysuria and acute anal fissure. Further record review revealed Resident #48 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place and a surgical wound to his/her right hip, and bilateral heel/midfoot ulcerations.
7. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #109 on 11/20/2023, with diagnoses that included Unspecified intestinal obstruction, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, and colostomy status. Further record review revealed Resident #109 had a GT in place.
8. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #111 on 11/24/2023, with diagnoses that included left proximal femur fracture, and other forms of acute ischemic heart disease. Continued record review revealed Resident #111 had a surgical wound to the left hip.
9. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #118 on 11/22/2023, with diagnoses that included venous insufficiency and varicose veins of left lower extremity (LLE) with ulcer of unspecified site. Further record review revealed Resident #118 had a wound with edema to the left lower extremity (LLE).
10. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #119 on 11/27/2023, with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of bronchus or lung with secondary malignant neoplasm of brain and bone, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition and gastrostomy status. Continued record review revealed Resident #119 had a GT in place.
11. Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #560 on 11/30/2023, with diagnoses that included displaced fracture of right proximal humerus, BPH and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Further record review revealed Resident #560 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place.
During interview with the DON on 11/30/23 9:47 AM, she stated they (the facility) followed guidelines for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. When asked about the residents observed to have indwelling catheters, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes or wounds with no EBPs in place, the DON stated she would follow up with the Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse.
Observation on 11/30/2023 at 4:15 PM, of Unit 200 revealed Resident #44's room door had no EBP signage posted despite his/her having an indwelling catheter. Continued observation of Resident #47's room/door revealed no EBP signage posted, despite his/her having an indwelling catheter and a PEG tube. Further observation on 11/30/2023 at 4:15 PM, of Resident #119's room/door revealed no EBP signage posted despite him/her having a wound.
Observation on all units on 12/01/2023 beginning at 10:15 AM, revealed residents on all units continued to have no TBP in place, as evidenced by absence of any signage or supplies located by their rooms.
Observation across the 100, 200, 300 and 400 units on 12/02/2023 beginning at 8:30 AM, revealed EBP signage and supplies for Resident #119, Resident #109, Resident #48, Resident #111, Resident #47, Resident #44, Resident #560, Resident #118, Resident #3, Resident #41 and Resident #16.
During interview with the Administrator, who was also the secondary IP, on 12/01/2023 at 2:07 PM, she stated the facility should have been using Enhanced Barrier Precautions for residents with an indwelling device. She stated she did not know why those precautions were not currently in place for residents with indwelling devices. The Administrator stated they reviewed the Infection Control policies in Quality Assurance meetings. She further stated the QA Committee typically documented policy reviews once a year during a QA meeting.
During interview with LPN #7 on 12/01/2023 at 3:50 PM, she stated she was not aware of the criteria for EBP.
During interview with the Quality Improvement (QI) Manager on 12/03/2023 at 1:27 PM, she stated she was aware of EBP, however, the facility was only using EBPs currently to protect residents when there was a resident with an MDRO requiring contact precautions in the facility. She stated staff had received education on EBPs in August and then again on 12/01/2023. The QI Manager stated any infection reportable to the health department would have triggered using EBP. She stated the facility did not have a good answer why there was no EBP in place. The QI Manager stated, after she pulled the policy and procedure and reviewed it, they placed Resident #119, Resident #109, Resident #48, Resident #111, Resident #47, Resident #44, Resident #560, Resident #118, Resident #3, Resident #41 and Resident #16 in EBP. In continued interview, she stated the facility had conducted face to face inservices with staff who have worked since implementing EBP. The QI Manager stated they then had a Care Feed (electronic system for disseminating information widely via cell phone text) communication that there was Relias Education and face to face training pending for those who had not worked.
During interview with State Trained Nurse Aide (STNA) #29 on 12/01/2023 3:37 PM, she stated she had no problem with needed supplies, as housekeeping restocked supplies for all the units. She stated there was a cart and signage at the door if a resident was on any kind of TBP, and the nurse was to give information about the type of precautions to other staff.
Interview with STNA #13 on 12/01/2023 at 3:44 PM, she stated if a resident was on TBP, usually the nurse would say what type of precautions were in place, and there would be signage on the door.
During interview with STNA #2 on 12/03/2023 at 1:50 PM, she stated she was trained on Saturday (12/02/2023) She stated training was completed via text message because she was not at the facility and that was often how they communicated. STNA #2 stated if she was going to do anything to a patient that had a point of entry use of EBPs, she would put on gown, gloves, and a mask if something like a Foley (catheter) were present. STNA #2 stated if a resident had a Foley, needed a bath and bed change, she would use PPE. She further stated she did not recall prior EBP training at the facility.
In interview with STNA #3 on 12/03/2023 at 3:45 PM, she stated she had seen the EBP signage before, and the nurse had told her to gown and glove for that precaution, related to something about urine, and that she must gown for any high contact care. She stated that was for residents, such as those who had a catheter.
In interview with STNA #16 on 12/03/2023 at 3:52 PM, she stated the nurse gave face-to-face inservices about EBP; however, she did not recall signing an attendance sheet. She stated EBP had something to do with urine but she was not sure. STNA #16 stated she just read the signage and followed it. In additional interview, she stated she knew staff did not have to gown to pass medications, gowning was necessary to help a resident in EBP to the bathroom or when assisting with other personal care. She stated she had not checked Relias lately for trainings, but felt comfortable that she knew what she was expected to do.
During interview with STNA #36 on 12/03/2023 at 5:27 PM, she stated she received face to face inservicing about EBP that explained EBPs were used to help prevent transfer of infection, more from staff to the residents. She also stated it was because of catheters and g-tubes. STNA #36 further stated she also received written information about EBP, that she signed to attest she had read.
During interview with STNA #37 on 12/03/2023 at 5:34 PM, she stated she had received face to face inservicing and written information to read and sign about EBP. She stated with residents in EBP, she was expected to wear gloves and a gown if entering the room to provide personal care; however, she could answer a call light, bring water to the resident, or other non-contact actions without a gown.
In interview with LPN #1 on 12/03/2023 at 1:40 PM, she stated if a resident was on EBP and needed something like their tray setup she would clean her hands, and if they had any type of opening, we must gown and glove for any entry into the body. She stated training took place yesterday (12/02/2023) given by the Administrator. LPN #1 stated that it was possible that prior training was completed at the facility regarding EBP. In continued interview, she stated during the training provided by the Administrator (on 12/02/2023) they went through several scenarios and examples and she felt comfortable with the content provided to do her work safely.
In interview with LPN #16 on 12/03/2023 1:30 PM, she stated education on the facility's EBPs took place yesterday in a face to face setting. She stated the education provided was related to the signage, and that residents with catheters, tubes, or other points of entry required EBP. In continued interview, she stated multi drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) required EBP. LPN #16 stated any type of contact care would require PPE use. She stated that as an LPN, she was comfortable with the content in order to continue her work at the facility at that time. She further stated did not recall any specific prior training at the facility related to EBPs.
During interview with LPN #15 on 12/03/2023 at 1:35 PM, she stated she had worked at the facility for a few months. She stated she was educated on EBPs last night. She stated the education included specific patients (residents) that were on EBP now, and how to do EBP as an LPN. LPN #15 stated they educated as to the specific types of personal protective equipment to use. She further stated the facility provided EBP training prior to the current survey. LPN #15 further stated she felt comfortable with the content in order to do her work here at the facility.
During interview with LPN #21 on 12/03/2023 at 3:58 PM, she stated EBP was for residents with wounds, catheter, ostomies or g-tubes. LPN #21 stated EBP was applied for residents in those circumstances because the wounds and devices were an entry for an infection. She further stated she had to sign the sheet with information about EBP that she had read it and felt comfortable with what she was taught and expected to do.
During interview with the DON on 12/04/2023 at 9:54 AM, she stated they had provided a mass education on EBP in August and then again in December. She stated she expected nurses to initiate needed precautions on admission. The DON further stated the facility had folders on each unit with resources and guidance for actions to take, which was broken down by disease.
During interview with the State Regional Infection Prevention Program Coordinator on 12/04/2023 at 10:06 AM, she stated the CDC expanded EBP to those without a history of infection or colonization. She stated it did not matter if no other residents had an MDRO, those residents with wounds or indwelling devices should have been on EBP. She further stated when the CDC made recommendations, CMS expected facilities to implement them.