KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

388 PERKINS MADDEN ROAD, HINDMAN, KY 41822 (606) 785-5011
For profit - Limited Liability company 92 Beds SEKY HOLDING CO. Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
83/100
#60 of 266 in KY
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Knott County Health and Rehabilitation Center in Hindman, Kentucky, has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for care. It ranks #60 out of 266 facilities in Kentucky, placing it in the top half, and is the only nursing home in Knott County, making it the best local option. The facility is improving overall, having reduced its issues from three in 2019 to none reported in 2024. Staffing is a strength, with a 4 out of 5-star rating and a turnover rate of just 29%, which is well below the state average. However, there have been specific concerns, such as a staff member administering a protein supplement against a physician's order and failing to flush a G-tube before medication administration, which could lead to complications. Additionally, a staff member did not wash their hands before serving food, risking infection. While the facility has no fines and has good health inspection ratings, these incidents highlight areas that need attention.

Trust Score
B+
83/100
In Kentucky
#60/266
Top 22%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
3 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Kentucky's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kentucky facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 53 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Kentucky. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2019: 3 issues
2024: 0 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Low Staff Turnover (29%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (29%)

    19 points below Kentucky average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: SEKY HOLDING CO.

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

Jul 2019 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality for one (1) of twenty (20) sampled residents (Resident #65). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 06/28/19 to discontinue a protein nutritional supplement. However review of the monthly orders for June and July 2019 revealed the protein supplement had continued to be administered. The findings include: Review of the policy titled Protocol for Physician Orders, no date, revealed that any new physician's order received will be noted and transcribed to the appropriate place and the orders shall be followed accordingly until changed; e.g., Medication Administration Record (MAR), and Treatment Administration Record (TAR), etc. Observation on 07/25/19 at 2:00 PM revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 administered a protein nutritional supplement to Resident #65. Review of the record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Aphasia, Gastrostomy, and Dysphagia. Record review further revealed that a physician's order had been written to discontinue the protein nutritional supplement on 06/28/19. Further review of the record revealed that although the supplement had been discontinued, the order remained on the July 2019 monthly orders. Further review of the MAR for 07/01/19 revealed the protein nutritional supplement had been given three (3) times a day up to 07/25/19. Interview on 07/25/19 at 3:40 PM with LPN #1 revealed that she was new to working with Resident #65 and was unaware that the protein nutritional supplement had been discontinued; therefore, she administered the supplement. Interview on 07/25/19 at 3:47 PM with Registered Nurse (RN) #2 revealed that she was the nurse to take off the new order that stated to discontinue the protein nutritional supplement. However, she stated that she did not transcribe the order nor did she remove the order from the MAR. RN #2 stated that she should have followed up with the order and transcribed it herself. Interview on 07/25/19 at 3:55 PM with RN #1 revealed she was the Unit Manager and stated there was a process to verify that orders from the previous day have been transcribed properly. RN #1 stated that she had not identified any concerns, that this was an oversight. Interview on 07/25/19 at 4:26 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed there is a process for transcribing physician's orders and that she had not identified any concerns related to the transcription of orders up to this time and that this was an oversight.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of twenty (20) sampled residents (Resident #65) received treatment a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of twenty (20) sampled residents (Resident #65) received treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. Observation on 07/25/19 at 2:00 PM revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 gave medications through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) and failed to flush the G-tube prior to administering the medications. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration Policy, undated, revealed that G-tubes should be flushed with at least 30 cubic centimeters (cc) of water before and after completing the medication administration. Observation of medication administration on 07/25/19 at 2:00 PM for Resident #65 revealed LPN #1 administered the following medications: Lisinopril 2.5 milligrams (mg) (medication for blood pressure), Metoprolol 25 mg (medication for blood pressure), Multi-Vitamin tablet, Nexium 40 mg (medication to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease), and Hydrocodone/APAP 5/325 mg (medication to treat pain). Further observation revealed that LPN #1 did not flush the G-tube with 30 cc of water prior to administering the medication per facility Medication Administration Policy. Interview conducted with LPN #1 on 07/25/19 at 4:00 PM revealed she should have flushed the G-tube with 30 cc of water. LPN #1 stated she was nervous and forgot to flush the G-tube. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/25/19 at 4:10 PM revealed that the LPN should have flushed the G-tube before giving medications with 30 cc of water and afterwards. She further revealed that she had not had any concerns before this issue occurred.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program for one (1) o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program for one (1) of twenty (20) sampled residents (Resident #136). Observation of Resident #136 revealed staff served a meal tray to the resident after touching her own hair multiple times. State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) #1 did not wash her hands before serving the meal tray. Staff then proceeded to prepare the resident's meal tray by opening the corn on the cob that was wrapped in aluminum foil and applying butter. Staff also continued to touch other food items on the resident's tray without washing/sanitizing her hands. The findings include: Review of the facility's Guidelines For Hand hygiene policy, undated, revealed that indications for hand washing included that before eating, staff wash their hands with a non-antimicrobial soap and water or with an antimicrobial soap and water. Review of the facility's Meal Pass Tips policy, undated, revealed that hands should be washed and sanitized between meal trays. Review of Resident #136's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 07/17/19 with diagnoses that included Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Dementia, Essential Primary Hypertension, and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Review of Resident #136's Plan of Care, revealed the resident required the assistance of staff to set up meal trays. Observation of Resident #136 on 07/23/19 at 12:05 PM, revealed SRNA #1 was providing meal service to residents. As SRNA #1 walked down the hall to the meal cart to retrieve a meal tray, SRNA #1 was observed brushing her hair back with her ungloved hands multiple times before providing meal service. SRNA #1 retrieved a tray from the meal cart and delivered it to Resident #136. SRNA #1 did not wash or sanitize her hands after touching her hair multiple times. Further observations revealed SRNA #1 prepared Resident #136's food by opening the corn on the cob and putting butter on the corn and opened other packages for the resident that were on the resident's tray without washing or sanitizing her hands. An interview with SRNA #1 on 07/23/19 at 12:20 PM, confirmed she did not wash or sanitize her hands before setting up Resident 136's meal tray. The SRNA stated she was aware she should have washed her hands prior to setting up the meal tray and that she was unaware that she had touched her hair. SRNA #1 stated she guessed she did it out of habit. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 07/25/19 at 3:00 PM, revealed that SRNAs received infection control training upon hiring, every six (6) months, annually, and as needed. She stated the Handwashing Observation Tool training form had been completed by SRNA #1 on 06/27/19. She then stated SRNA #1 should have washed her hands before and after serving a resident's meal tray. The Director of Nursing stated SRNA #1's practice was a break in the infection control process because she was touching her hair and did not wash her hands. She also revealed she had no concerns prior to this incident.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Kentucky.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Kentucky facilities.
  • • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Knott County Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Kentucky, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Knott County Center Staffed?

CMS rates KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 29%, compared to the Kentucky average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Knott County Center?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2019. These included: 3 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Knott County Center?

KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SEKY HOLDING CO., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 92 certified beds and approximately 87 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HINDMAN, Kentucky.

How Does Knott County Center Compare to Other Kentucky Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Kentucky, KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (29%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Knott County Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Knott County Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Kentucky. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Knott County Center Stick Around?

Staff at KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 29%, the facility is 17 percentage points below the Kentucky average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.

Was Knott County Center Ever Fined?

KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Knott County Center on Any Federal Watch List?

KNOTT COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.