CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for six (6) of forty-seven (47) sampled residents (Residents #1, #16, #17, #18, #19 and #88).
1. Review of Resident #1's CCP revealed the facility assessed Resident #1 as a fall risk, on 05/29/2018, with a history of impaired cognition and restless/anxious behaviors, balance problems of which resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. On 01/01/2020, the resident was ordered a low air loss (LAL) mattress (alternating pressure system) developed for the comfort of the resident and related to risk for pressure ulcers; however, the resident was not care planned for the air mattress. Resident #1's care plan provided no evidence of ordered guidelines to ensure appropriate settings that correlated with the resident's weights or documented evidence of a monitoring system in place to ensure proper functioning of the air mattress and safety of the resident. On 02/16/2022, Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall with an injury, whose root cause was determined to be the air mattress, which caused the resident to roll out of the bed and onto the floor.
Continued review of Resident #1's CCP revealed care plan interventions for staff to observe for any moods/behaviors that might contribute to falls when the resident was restless in the wheel chair, and to offer position changes, to include increased supervision of visual checks when the resident was up in his/her wheel chair; however, no specific guidelines were provided. On 02/29/2020, the facility initiated the intervention for staff to ensure resident to be up only one (1) to two (2) hours as tolerated in the reclining wheelchair, and to include increase visual checks when resident was up in chair. However, Resident #1 sustained a second fall with injury on 07/08/2022 from his/her wheelchair, while in the lounge area without supervision. It was reported Resident #1 was trying to get up and screaming that he/she just wanted to go back to bed. Resident #1's record review and staff interviews revealed the resident had been in the wheelchair for approximately four (4) hours with multiple requests and attempts to return to bed during that time; therefore, staff failed to implement the resident's care planned interventions while up in the wheelchair.
2. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed the facility assessed the resident to be a risk for falls related to gait/balance problems since admission. Resident #16's Physical Therapy (PT) discharge recommendations, dated 04/27/2023, revealed the resident was to ambulate with no assistive device, stand by assist (SBA)/contact guard assist (CGA) while observing oxygen saturation. However, the resident's care plan dated 04/26/2023, revealed the resident was independent in the room with a walker, and interventions included the resident to wear proper non-skid footwear when up and practice oxygen tube safety. Resident #16 stated he/she was in the bathroom on 05/04/2023, without wearing nonskid footwear, stepped over oxygen tubing, lost his/her balance, and fell hitting his/her left shoulder. However, staff failed to implement proper nonskid footwear or address the PT's discharge recommendations to ensure the resident's safety.
3. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed the facility assessed the resident to be a risk for falls due to weakness, impaired cognition, and decreased mobility. Review of Resident #17's care plan dated 03/29/2023, revealed the resident required a contour mattress to prevent falling out of bed. On 04/01/2023 interventions added included extensive assistance of two (2) staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and bathing, and the resident was non-ambulatory. Resident #17 experienced a fall on 04/17/2023 by rolling out of bed and did not have a contour mattress on the bed. This care plan intervention had not been implemented.
4. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed the facility assessed the resident to be a high risk for falls due to gait and balance issues related to a Cardiovascular Accident (CVA) with right side hemiplegia. Review of Resident #18's fall investigations revealed the resident had a fall on 04/08/2023 and another fall on 04/17/2023, and both involved the resident falling out of bed. Interventions in the care plan for the first fall, such as ensure the urinal was at the bedside was not developed, and staff did not assist the resident to the bathroom as per the care plan. For the second fall, interventions were developed of fall mat to the side of the bed, and move the resident closer to the nurses' station. However, per observation and interviews, staff failed to implement fall safety interventions as Resident #18 was not moved closer to the nurses' station and did not have a mat placed to the side of his/her bed.
5. Review of Resident #19's care plan revealed the resident was dependent on a two (2) person physical assistance for bathing, bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. The resident was placed on a Low Air Loss (LAL) mattress since date of admission; however, no resident specific guidelines were provided to ensure safety of the mattress. Resident #19 rolled from the bed to the floor while Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7 was performing personal care. CNA #7 stated she did not look at the Kardex (nurse aide care plan) to see the resident required a two (2) person assistance with personal care.
6. Review of Resident #88's care plan revealed CNA #4 failed to implement the care plan for residents at risk for behaviors, and the resident exhibited abusive behaviors to include verbal and physical aggression toward staff during personal care. Consequently, CNA #4 failed to implement behavioral interventions and cursed at the resident.
The facility's failure to ensure residents' care plans were resident specific related to their physical needs, behaviors and required supervision as well as guidelines to address the settings and required staff for assisting residents on LAL mattresses with interventions implemented has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident.
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 05/26/2023 and was determined to exist on 07/08/2022 in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan (F656), Develop/Implement Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plans, at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care (F689), Accidents and Supervision at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR §483.70 Administration (F835, F837, and F841), at a S/S of a K; and 42 CFR 483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (F867), at a S/S of a K. Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) was identified at 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care (F689), Accidents and Supervision. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 05/26/2023.
The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on 06/07/2023, with the facility alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/01/2023. The State Survey Agency (SSA) validated removal of the Immediate Jeopardy, as alleged on 06/01/2023, prior to exit on 06/10/2023, which lowered the scope and severity (S/S) to an E while the facility develops and implements a Plan of Correction and the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) monitors to ensure compliance with systemic changes.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 01/13/2018, revealed staff members were to ensure the resident or his/her representative was included in all aspects of the person-centered care plan. Per the policy, the planning was to include the provision of services to enable the resident to live with dignity and support the resident's goals, choices, and preferences which included, but were not limited to, goals related to the resident's daily routines. The policy stated care plans must be prepared with input from the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), which included, but was not limited to the Physician, a Registered Nurse (RN), and a Nurse Aide with responsibility for the resident. The policy also stated staff should include input from the resident and his/her representative to the extent practicable. Per the policy, the care plan would describe the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being.
1. Review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 05/11/2018, with diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Age-Related Osteoporosis without Current Pathological Fracture, and Specified Disorders of Bone Density.
Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 01/11/2022, revealed the resident had no history of falls since admission and was not interviewable, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three (3) of fifteen (15), which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The assessment also indicated Resident #1 was at risk for pressure ulcer/injury, but had no unhealed pressure ulcers; however, the resident was currently treated with a pressure reducing device for chair and bed. The assessment also indicated the resident required extensive assistance of two (2) staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting.
Review of Resident #1's CCP, initiated 05/29/2018, revealed staff identified that the resident was at risk for falls related to the fall risk score, balance problems, weakness, restless/anxious behaviors at times, required assistance with transfers and bed mobility, and possible side effects of medication. Interventions implemented since admission included staff to ensure one-half (1/2) side rails while in bed for turning and repositioning, bed in lowest position, mechanical lift for transfers, call light in reach, and promote use of appropriate footwear when up. Additional interventions were added on 06/13/2018, to include increased supervision of visual checks when resident was up in his/her chair; however, no resident guidelines were provided. Additionally, interventions added on 02/29/2020, indicated staff was to ensure resident to be only up one (1) to two (2) hours as tolerated in the reclining wheelchair, and to increase visual checks when resident was up in the chair; however, no resident guidelines were provided to explain the type of supervision, such as one-to-one (1:1) and the time frame of visual checks.
Review of Resident #1's Physician's orders for January 2020, revealed an order for an air mattress (alternating pressure system developed for the comfort of the resident) every day and night shift. However, the resident was not care planned for the air mattress, as no ordered setting guidelines were provided based on the resident's weight or documented evidence of a monitoring system in place to ensure the safety and functioning of the air mattress and to ensure proper settings to correlate with the resident's weight.
Review of Resident #1's Incident Audit Report, dated 02/16/2022 at 9:35 PM, revealed the resident was found on the floor next to his/her bed, and the resident stated he/she did not know what happened or how he/she ended up on the floor. Resident #1 was sent to the Emergency Department (ED), and the Computed Tomography (CT) scan showed an acute fracture of the anterior/posterior C2 (cervical) vertebrae. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) concluded the root cause of the fall was from the air mattress (the resident rolled out of the bed). Therefore, a new intervention was to discontinue the air mattress and apply a contour mattress (edges on the mattress were built higher than the center to keep the resident from rolling out/off the bed).
Review of Resident #1's Incident Audit Report, dated 07/08/2022 at 2:30 PM, revealed the resident was found lying in the floor next to his/her wheelchair in the lounge on the 200 Unit. The resident was trying to get up and screaming that he/she just wanted to go back to bed. The IDT concluded the root cause of the fall was the resident desired a position change. The resident was sent to the hospital. Resident #1's hospital record, dated 07/08/2022 revealed x-ray imaging showed Resident #1 had an acute nondisplaced fracture of the proximal tibial metaphysis; bilateral tibial fracture, and right distal fibula avulsion fractures, with no surgical intervention recommended.
Review of Resident #1's care plan updated 07/13/2022, after Resident #1's second fall on 07/08/2022, revealed interventions to include when resident was restless in the bed or chair, offer position change, and every fifteen (15) minute supervision checks. However, the interventions that were in place before the fall to ensure resident to be only up one (1) to two (2) hours as tolerated in the reclining wheelchair, and to increase visual checks when resident was up in the chair were not implemented.
During an interview on 05/18/2023 at 2:25 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9, she stated air mattresses would increase residents' risk for falls, and she would expect staff to increase supervision with residents on air mattresses, ensure the bed was in the lowest position, and bed rails were in place, if ordered. She stated interventions should be implemented to prevent falls and care planned appropriately. She stated, if this was not done, residents could fall again with an adverse outcome, as Resident #1 did, with his/her second fall. LPN #9 stated there should have been one-to-one (1:1) supervision, and the resident should only have been up in the chair for two (2) hours, as care planned.
During an interview on 05/19/2023 at 12:15 PM with CNA #34, he stated he did not receive any type of training or education from the facility. However, he stated he knew if a resident was up and requested to go back to bed, it was the resident's right to be placed back to bed. He said this was especially true if the resident was attempting to get up on his/her own and was care planned with guidelines when up in a wheelchair. Further, he stated most of the time when residents were in the dayroom/lounge, there was no supervision, no one-to-one (1:1) monitoring, or staff to sit with the residents. He added related to air mattresses, he believed they put the residents at risk for falls, due to their body alignment, and it could push the resident out of the bed. Therefore, he stated training and education should be done to ensure resident safety.
During an interview on 05/22/2023 at 4:45 PM with LPN #4, she stated she had worked at the facility since June 2021, and since that time, no staff members had stayed in the dayroom/lounge/dining room on the 200 Unit to supervise residents. She added, if a resident was eating, the resident might have a staff to monitor; however, there was no schedule for monitoring. She stated, staff will take turns and work together to ensure resident safety. Further, LPN #4 stated there was no documentation log and/or charting system to ensure residents' siderails were in place, the bed in the lowest position, and air mattress settings were accurate. She stated it was the nurse's responsibility to ensure resident safety and ensure care plans were being implemented accurately, and if not, it could put residents at risk of having a negative outcome, such as falls with or without injuries.
During an interview on 05/24/2023 at 4:45 PM with RN #7, she stated she was aware Resident #1 had fallen prior to the current fall, and the resident had requested to go back to bed approximately thirty (30) minutes prior to this fall. She stated, however, she was not familiar with Resident #1's care plan, interventions, or that the resident was a fall risk. Therefore, RN #7 stated this put the resident at danger for an injury. In addition, RN #7 stated the facility did not provide the education needed for residents at risk, the investigation process, or updating the care plan. She added, the facility did not do a thorough investigation, which was the resident's right. She stated if staff was not familiar with the resident, not getting educated on the care plan put the resident at risk.
During an interview on 05/18/2023 at 3:53 PM with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), she stated air mattresses increased a resident's risk for falls, and she expected staff to increase supervision with residents that had an air mattress. The ADON stated she did not recall Resident #1's second fall; however, she would expect staff to implement the care plan interventions, because she said, They are a safeguard for the residents, and I would have expected my staff to assist the resident back to bed, it is the residents right. In addition, the ADON stated she did not recall any education that was provided to staff or any discussion related to the resident's second fall, as she stated, I might not have been there, not involved.
During an interview on 05/24/2023 at 9:30 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated she had not been monitoring the air mattresses, and she did not check the care plans to ensure the air mattresses were care planned with the setting accuracy. Therefore, the DON stated, if the setting was not correct and monitored, the mattress would be of no benefit to the resident, putting him/her at risk. In addition, the DON stated supervision meant direct visualization of the resident, into the room to see the resident to ensure resident safety. She added, in the 200 Unit dayroom/lounge, it was right outside of the nurses' station; however, staff could not see the resident unless inside the room. Further, the DON stated she expected staff to supervise and listen to the residents and their requests, to always ensure resident safety, and to have a staff member in the dining room/lounge, not just at mealtimes. She stated at other times, residents should expect staff to monitor them due to potential choking, falls, and/or other incidents.
During an interview on 05/24/2023 at 10:22 AM with Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) #1, related to Resident #1's second fall, the APRN stated she would expect the resident to be monitored in the dining room related to his/her history in order to prevent another injury. She stated, per the resident request's and the intervention to be up in the wheelchair as tolerated, obviously, the resident was not tolerating being up and should have been put back to bed. She stated this resulted in a negative outcome that could have been prevented.
2. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 06/29/2022, with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia/Hypercapnia, and Dependent on Oxygen (O2).
Review of Resident #16's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/14/2023, revealed the resident had no history of falls since admission was assessed to have a BIMS score of fifteen (15) of fifteen (15), which indicated the resident had intact cognitive response. The assessment also indicated Resident #16 was assessed for oxygen therapy; was independent with bed mobility, personal hygiene, transfers, and toileting; was independent with set up assistance with dressing and eating; and was independent with walker in room for ambulation.
Review of Resident #16's CCP, initiated on 06/30/2022, revealed staff identified that the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to weakness, impaired mobility, impaired gait/balance, pain, and shortness of air (SOA). Interventions indicated the resident was independent with a walker in the room for ambulation, to give assistance upon request for locomotion, and was independent with bed mobility, personal hygiene, transfers, and toileting. Additional interventions were added on 07/01/2022 for staff to assist with ADLs per resident's request and when there was increased SOA. Additionally, on 07/01/2022, the resident was care planned as at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems and medication regimen. Interventions indicated staff was to be sure the resident's call light was within reach, encourage the resident to always wear nonskid footwear, and Physical Therapy (PT) to evaluate and treat as ordered or as needed (PRN).
Review of Resident #16's Incident Audit Report, dated 05/04/2023 at 8:07 PM, revealed the resident was found sitting in the bathroom floor with his/her back against wall, and the resident was not wearing nonskid socks. The resident stated he/she tripped over the oxygen tubing and hit his/her head on the wall. Per Resident #16's hospital medical record diagnostic imaging of the left shoulder, dated 05/05/2023, the resident had a chronic left clavicle fracture with displacement.
Review of Resident #16's care plan, updated on 05/04/2023, after the resident's fall on 05/04/2023, revealed interventions for staff to ensure the resident was educated on wearing proper nonskid footwear and oxygen tubing safety. An additional intervention, on 05/30/2023, revealed the resident was ordered retractable oxygen (O2) tubing.
Review of Resident #16's Physical Therapy discharge summary recommendations, dated 04/27/2023, revealed the resident's maximum potential had been achieved as he/she was able to tolerate prolonged ambulatory distance with no assistive device (AD). The discharge summary stated the resident continued to require stand by assist (SBA)/contact guard assist (CGA) while observing oxygen saturation. However, the resident's care plan, dated 04/26/2023, revealed the resident was independent in the room with the walker.
During an interview on 05/24/2023 at 8:30 AM, Restorative Aide (RA) #1 stated there was an issue with the PT discharge plan not matching the resident's Kardex and care plan.
3. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 03/13/2023, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease with Dementia, Atrial Fibrillation (on Plavix, an anticoagulant), and COPD. Resident #17 was assessed to be a risk for falls due to weakness, impaired cognition, and decreased mobility.
Review of Resident #17's admission MDS Assessment, dated 03/17/2023, revealed the resident had no history of falls since admission. Further, the resident was assessed to have a BIMS score of ninety-nine (99), which indicated the resident could not complete the BIMS assessment tool. The assessment also indicated Resident #17 triggered for mood and behavioral symptoms. The assessment also indicated the resident required extensive assistance of two (2) staff members for bed mobility, bathing, transfers, and toileting, and the resident was non-ambulatory.
Review of Resident #17's CCP, dated 03/13/2023, revealed the resident required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL); required assistance of two (2) staff for bed mobility, transfers, and bathing; and the resident was non-ambulatory. In addition, staff identified that the resident was at risk for falls related to new environment, balance problems related to weakness, use of psychotropic medication, poor safety awareness, and behaviors. Interventions indicated staff was to ensure call light within reach when in room, hands on assist with transfers, and observe for any fall related side effects from psychotropic medications, such as increased drowsiness or dizziness and staggering gait. Continued review revealed Resident #17 was care planned for altered psychosocial needs related to dementia with interventions for staff to monitor behavior every shift and document if noted; provide non-pharmacological interventions such as one-to-one (1:1) supervision (specify); however, no one-to-one (1:1) resident guidelines were provided to ensure the resident's safety. According to Resident #17's plan of care, dated 03/29/2023, an intervention was added for a contour pressure reducing mattress; however, the resident had not been care planned for another type of mattress prior to this intervention.
Review of Resident #17's Incident Audit Report, dated 04/17/2023 at 12:49 AM, revealed the resident was lying in the floor, on his/her back beside the bed. The report stated the resident had rolled out of bed, hitting his/her face on the floor, with lacerations and hematoma to the forehead and bridge of the nose. Review of Resident #17's hospital medical record revealed a CT scan showed the resident had an acute minimally displaced nasal/septum fracture.
Review of Resident #17's plan of care updated on 04/17/2023, after resident fall on 04/17/2023, revealed interventions for an additional contour pressure reducing mattress to define parameters of mattress; although, the resident had been care planned for a contour mattress dated on 03/29/2023. Additional interventions initiated on 04/17/2023 to include fall mat to the left side of the bed, and per family request, the right side of the bed was to be against the wall.
The Executive Director (ED) stated, in an interview on 05/23/2023 at 11:10 AM, she did not know how the fall could have been prevented unless staff would have put the contour mattress on sooner (which was care planned on 03/29/2023 but not done). She stated the reason for the mattress change was to have a barrier to help prevent the resident from falling from the bed. She further stated, Resident #17 did fine when up in a wheelchair because he/she was not as fidgety.
4. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 02/15/2023, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease with Dementia, Cardiovascular Accident (CVA) with Right Side Hemiplegia and Depression.
Review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 04/03/2023, revealed the resident was assessed with a BIMS score of twelve (12) of fifteen (15), which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment also indicated Resident #18 had a history of falls since admission with injury. According to the MDS assessment, Resident #18 required the extensive assistance of two (2) persons, and physical assistance for transfers, bed mobility, bathing, and toileting. However, the assessment for how the resident walked between locations in his/her room indicated activity did not occur. Additionally, the assessment indicated the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder, with no toileting program currently being used to manage the resident's bowel/bladder incontinence.
Review of Resident #18's CCP, initiated on 03/07/2023, revealed staff identified that the resident was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems, use of antidepressant medication, and the resident would raise and lower height of bed on his/her own. According to the plan of care related to the resident's risk for falls, interventions indicated staff was to ensure the resident's reacher was close to him/her to grasp items; the resident wore appropriate footwear; and staff was to observe for fall related side effects from antidepressants, such as increased drowsiness, dizziness, or a staggering gait. Continued review of Resident #18's plan of care revealed the resident had functional bladder incontinence related to dementia and impaired mobility with interventions as indicated for staff to encourage and assist the resident with transferring to the bathroom commode during rounds and would need to stay with the resident and check every two (2) to three (3) hours and as required for incontinence. Further review revealed an additional intervention added on 03/22/2023, for standard mattress changed to forty-two (42) inch wide mattress.
Review of Resident #18's Incident Audit Report, dated 04/08/2023, revealed between 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM the resident was found on floor at the foot of both beds in his/her room; the fall was unwitnessed; and no injury resulted from the fall. Per the report, the resident was attempting to transfer self to the bathroom when the fall occurred. The report stated Resident #18 was noted to have incontinence when assessed post-fall.
Review of Resident #18's plan of care revealed an update on 04/10/2023, which indicated for staff to keep urinal within reach when the resident was in bed. However, in the resident's care plan, prior to the fall, staff had failed to develop this intervention to address the resident's functional bladder incontinence and had failed to assist the resident to the bathroom.
Review of Resident #18's Incident Audit Report, dated 04/17/2023, revealed at 7:50 PM, Resident #18 sustained another fall within nine (9) days from the initial fall on 04/08/2023; however, this unwitnessed fall resulted in the resident having a nasal/septum fracture and fracture of the anterior maxillary process. Resident #18 was found on his/her stomach lying in the floor beside the bed. Resident #18 stated, I fell out of bed. Further review of the report revealed on 04/18/2023, the IDT reviewed and concluded the root cause was that the resident lies on his/her side in bed when resting. Since the resident was currently on a wider mattress, new interventions were to consider moving the resident to a room closer to the nurses' station and place a fall mat to the left side of the bed.
Review of Resident #18's plan of care updated on 04/17/2023, after the resident's second fall with a major injury, revealed interventions to include to consider moving the resident to a room closer to the nurses' station, bilateral pivot assist bars to assist with bed mobility and transfers, and a fall mat to the left side of the bed when the resident was in the bed. However, observations revealed Resident #18 had not been moved to a room closer to the nurses' station and did not have a mat placed to the left side of the bed on 05/19/2023 or 05/22/2023.
During an interview on 05/23/2023, with the Social Services Director (SSD), she stated Resident #18 did not have a mat on the morning of 05/23/2023, and she requested a fall mat be brought to the room.
During an interview on 05/23/2023, with the Maintenance Supervisor, he stated Resident #18, for over a month, did have a fall mat in the room. However, he stated it was folded up and against the wall.
5. Review of Resident #19's record revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 09/10/2021, and the resident was assessed to be a high risk for falls due to muscle rigidity secondary to Parkinson's Disease with other diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia and Aphasia.
Review of Resident #19's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/14/2023, revealed the resident had no history of falls since admission and was not interviewable, with a BIMS score of ninety-nine (99), which indicated the resident was unable to complete the BIMS assessment instrument. The assessment also indicated Resident #19 required extensive assistance of two (2) staff members for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting (incontinent of bowel and bladder), but was not on a toileting program. According to the assessment, Resident #19 was at risk for pressure ulcers (PU) and was assessed to need a pressure reducing bed/mattress.
Review of Resident #19's CCP, initiated 09/22/2021, revealed staff identified that the resident was at risk for falls related to balance problems, due to weakness, impaired vision, incontinence, and impaired cognition. Interventions indicated staff was to ensure the resident was centered in the bed after providing care. Continued review revealed Resident #19 was care planned for altered psychosocial needs related to dementia with interventions for staff to monitor behavior every shift and document if noted, provide non-pharmacological interventions such as redirect with activity, offer fluid/food, offer reassurance/conversation, one-to-one (1:1) supervision (specify); however, no specific one-to-one (1:1) guidelines were provided for staff, and it was not specified. Ongoing revi[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ha...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents or hazards. In addition, the facility failed to conduct a thorough fall investigation that led to a root cause determination; along with the development and implementation of an action plan after each fall for five (5) of forty-seven (47) sampled residents (Residents #1, #16, #17, #18 and #19).
1. On [DATE], Resident #1 was ordered an air mattress (alternating pressure system) for his/her comfort, without assessing the resident's needs and safety for the device. Review of the manufacture's recommendation for the air mattress revealed that to avoid the risk of death or injury from falling, staff were to read the user manual prior to its use. Continued review of the manufacture's recommendation revealed it was the requirement that the residents would be assessed and monitored for its use, for the resident's safety. Subsequently, on [DATE], the resident experienced a fall from his/her air mattress and sustained injuries which resulted in a Cervical (neck) Fracture.
In addition, Resident #1 sustained a second fall on [DATE] from his/her wheelchair while in the lounge area. Resident #1, prior to his/her fall, told staff he/she wanted to go to bed. Interviews and record review revealed Resident #1 was in his/her wheelchair for approximately four (4) hours without staff acknowledging the resident's request. As a result, the resident attempted to stand from his/her wheelchair and fell on the floor. The resident sustained a Displaced Fracture of the Proximal Tibial Metaphysis Bilaterally. The resident returned to the facility on [DATE], with Hospice/Palliative care services and expired on [DATE].
2. On [DATE], Resident #16 stated he/she was in the bathroom, stepped over his/her oxygen tubing, and lost his/her balance. The resident fell and hit his/her left shoulder on the wall of his/her bathroom. The resident sustained a Chronic left Clavicle Fracture with Displacement. The facility identified the root cause of the resident's fall was the lack of the non-skid footwear. However, the facility failed to implement changes to the resident's oxygen tubing, to reduce the resident's falls risk.
3. On [DATE], Resident #17 was found lying on the floor, on his/her back, beside his/her bed. Further review revealed Resident #17 hit his/her face on the floor. The resident sustained injuries to include a nasal bone and Septum Displaced Fracture. Review of the facility's falls incident report revealed the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation to support the determination of the root cause of restless.
4. On [DATE], Resident #18 sustained a fall out of his/her bed and the Hospital Record revealed, the facility had removed the resident's bed railings due to safety concerns. The facility's investigation revealed the resident fell out of bed. However, there was no other investigation completed to determine the root cause of the resident's fall to ensure appropriate interventions were in place to prevent the resident's falls. The resident sustained injuries which included a Nasal Septum Fracture and Fracture of the Anterior Maxillary process.
5. On [DATE], Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7 performed incontinence care without another staff member. Resident #19 rolled from his/her bed to the floor during incontinence care. The root cause was determined to be the resident was on an air mattress; however, the facility failed to determine within the root cause analysis that the resident was assessed to have two (2) staff to assist with his/her bed mobility. The resident sustained injuries to include a nasal bone fracture with a 9 centimeter (cm) facial laceration .
The facility's failure to have an effective system to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring to prevent falls/accidents has caused or is likely to cause serious harm or serious injury to the residents.
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] and was determined to exist on [DATE] in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan (F656), Develop/Implement Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plans, at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care (F689), Accidents and Supervision at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR §483.70 Administration (F835, F837, and F841), at a S/S of a K; and 42 CFR §483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, at a S/S of a K. Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) was identified at 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care (F689), Accidents and Supervision. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE].
The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on [DATE], with the facility alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE]. The State Survey Agency (SSA) validated removal of the Immediate Jeopardy, as alleged on [DATE], prior to exit on [DATE].
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled Fall Management, dated [DATE], revealed a fall was an unintentional change in position coming to rest on the ground, floor, or onto the next lower surface, which included onto a bed, chair, or bedside mat. The policy stated injury related to a fall was any documented injury that occurred as a result of or was recognized within a short period of time (hours or to a few days) after the fall and attributed to the fall. According to the policy, a major injury included bone fractures, joint dislocations, closed head injuries with altered consciousness, and subdural hematomas. Continued review of the policy also revealed a fall risk observation was completed on admission, quarterly, and annually, with any significant change in condition, and with any fall, and was utilized to identify individuals who were at high risk for falls. Further review of the policy revealed fall prevention was achieved through an interdisciplinary approach to managing risk factors and implementing appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls. Continued review of the policy revealed staff were to develop a plan of care, which included general and specific interventions to reduce fall risk. The policy further revealed staff were to investigate falls and complete a root cause analysis and determine an intervention based on information gathered from the investigation of the falls. The policy also stated the investigation and root cause analysis of a fall may include medications that place a resident at risk for falls, intrinsic/extrinsic fall risk factors, time of day, and devices used at the time of the fall.
Review of the Low Air Loss Mattress owner's manual titled Invacare Micro Air MA65 Series, dated [DATE], revealed to avoid the risk of death or injury from falling: Invacare suggested staff read and used the User Manual prior to using the product. Further, rails were to be in the raised position whenever a {resident} patient was in the bed, proper {resident}patient assessment and monitoring was required to prevent injury, variations in bed rail dimensions, and mattress thickness, size, or density would increase the risk of injury. Further review revealed staff were to work with a therapist, physician, and other medical staff to perform assessments to complete {resident} patient monitoring, to avoid death, injury.
1. Review of Resident #1's Closed Medical Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Age Related Osteoporosis without current Pathological Fracture, and Fatigue. Continued review revealed the resident was placed under hospice/palliative care on [DATE] and expired at the facility on [DATE].
Review of Resident #1's Physician Orders for [DATE] revealed an air mattress (alternating pressure system) was ordered for the comfort of the resident; every day/night shift.
Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no history of falls since admission. Continued review revealed the resident was assessed to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three (3), which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident was at risk for pressure ulcer/injury and was assessed to have had no unhealed pressure ulcers.
Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated on [DATE] revealed the resident was care planned for at risk for falls related to: his/her fall risk score, balance problems, weakness, restless/anxious behaviors, required assistance with transfers, bed mobility, and possible side effects of his/her medication. Interventions implemented since admission included staff were to ensure one-half (1/2) side rails while in bed for turning and repositioning, bed in the lowest position, mechanical lift for transfers, call light in reach, and promote the use of appropriate footwear when up. Additional interventions were added on [DATE], to include increased supervision of visual checks when the resident was up in his/her chair. Additionally, interventions were added on [DATE], indicating staff were to ensure the resident was to only be up one (1) to two (2) hours as tolerated in a reclining wheelchair. The facility failed; however, to ensure the resident was assessed and monitored for his/her air mattress, to ensure the safety of the resident to prevent injury, as well as, failed to care plan for and manage for the risk factors and implementation of the intervention to reduce the risk of falls while utilizing the air mattress, as per the facility's policy.
1 a.) Review of the facility's Incident Audit Report dated [DATE] at 9:35 PM revealed the resident was found on the floor next to his/her bed, with his/her feet towards the head of the bed and his/her head next to the wall. The resident was noted to have had a knot on his/her left side of his/her scalp. The resident stated he/she did not know what happened or how he/she ended up on the floor. According to the incident report, there were no witnesses to the incident and the resident was assessed to have no injuries. Continued review of the incident report, revealed the resident's pain level was not assessed, and the predisposing environmental/situational factors were not documented.
Further review of the facility's incident report revealed on [DATE], the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) met and concluded the root cause was that the resident was unable to provide a description of his/her fall related to impaired mental status due to his/her diagnosis of Dementia.
Review of the Nurse's Progress Note, dated [DATE] at 10:00 PM, revealed the resident had a change in condition; a fall with a hematoma to the left side of his/her scalp.
Review of the Nurse's Progress Note, dated [DATE] at 09:30 AM, revealed the resident complained of neck and left arm pain upon movement. Further review of the Note revealed an order was obtained to send Resident #1 to the emergency room (ER) for an evaluation.
Review of Resident #1's Hospital Medical Record, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had an admitting diagnosis of an initial fall encounter, a Nondisplaced Fracture of the second Cervical Vertebrae (vertebrae of the neck, immediately below the skull) related to a fall.
During a telephonic interview on [DATE] at 10:25 AM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #33, she stated she no longer worked at the facility. CNA #33 stated she was familiar with Resident #1 and recalled working the day Resident #1 was found on his/her floor. According to the CNA, she was working the 6:00 PM -6:00 AM shift and as she was walking up the hallway, she observed Resident #1 on the floor of his/her room with other staff at the resident's side. CNA #33 could not recall the exact date and/or time; however, she recalled Resident #1 to be fidgety and squirming around a lot. Further, she stated the resident had body alignment issues and the resident received a new fall mattress after his/her fall. CNA #33 stated that it was the facility's practice to provide an air mattress to the residents that tried to move around a lot. She further stated that if the air mattress was not straight or properly inflated, it could easily, at any time, cause the resident to fall off the mattress. CNA #33 stated residents deserve to have proper interventions and implemented procedures to ensure their safety and to prevent falls.
In an interview, on [DATE] at 2:25 PM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9, she stated on [DATE], she was completing her rounds at approximately 10:00 PM to 11:00 AM, when she found Resident #1 on the floor, next to the side of the bed between the wall and the bed. The LPN stated Resident #1 could not recall what happened. LPN #9 stated the physician was notified and she was instructed not to send the resident out, but to continue to monitor the resident. Further interview with the LPN revealed the resident began to complain of pain in the early morning and was sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation. LPN #9 stated there was no night shift supervisor at that time; however, the Executive Director (ED) started the investigation process when she came in the next morning.
LPN #9 further stated, on [DATE] at 2:25 PM, Resident #1 favored his/her right side and was on an air mattress; however, LPN #9 could not recall the resident's fall risk precautions at the time of the fall, but stated that after the resident's fall, his/her air mattress was switched out to a contour mattress and the resident was on every fifteen (15) minute checks upon return from the hospital. LPN #9 revealed the air mattresses would increase the resident's risk for falls and she would have expected staff to increase supervision with residents on air mattresses. LPN #9 stated interventions should have been put in place and implemented to prevent falls.
In an interview, on [DATE] at 1:05 PM, with the Maintenance Supervisor, he stated he was responsible for setting up the air loss mattresses and that he would apply the settings, as per the nurses' instructions. The Maintenance Supervisor stated he did not follow a written physician's order, nor did he utilize the manufacturer's recommendation related to the low Air Loss mattresses. Further, the Maintenance Supervisor revealed he was not part of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meetings, until recently, to discuss the facility's equipment. He stated the air mattresses were a risk factor for residents, especially those residents with mental impairments.
In an interview on [DATE] at 3:53 PM with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), she stated during the time of Resident #1's fall on [DATE], she was the Director of Nursing (DON), and she was made aware of the incident on [DATE], at approximately 10:00 PM. The ADON stated she was informed the resident had fallen out of bed and hit his/her head. She stated Resident #1 denied pain but displayed some disorientation. She stated at that time there was no procedure in place; she did not have a working list of residents on air mattresses, or staff that were responsible to monitor the airflow of the mattresses, nor a night shift supervisor to assist with falls investigation. She stated the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) met the next morning with the Executive Director (ED) and discussed any incidents and changes of condition overnight and IDT, as a team determined the root cause was the resident's air mattress chambers could get full of air and repositioning the resident, increasing the resident's risk for falling out of his/her bed, therefore, new interventions were updated to discontinue the resident's air mattress and apply the contour mattress. Additionally, the ADON stated the air mattresses increased the resident's risk for falls.
1 b.) Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident was assessed for a history of falls, with major injury. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident continued to require extensive assistance of two (2) staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting.
Review of Resident #1's Nurse's Progress Notes dated [DATE] at 1:10 PM revealed the resident was up in a chair after lunch per the resident's request. Further review of the Note revealed ten (10) to fifteen (15) minutes later, the resident was asking to go back to bed. The resident kept trying to scoot himself/herself out of the chair.
Review of the facility's Incident Audit Report dated [DATE] at 2:30 PM revealed the resident was found lying on the floor next to his/her wheelchair. Continued review revealed the resident was trying to get up and screaming that he/she just wanted to go back to bed. The resident had been in the lounge on the 200 Unit, visiting with his/her sister after lunch. Further, the resident stated, I fell out of my chair, wanna go to bed. According to the incident report, there were no witnesses to the incident, the resident was assessed for injuries, his/her pain was addressed, and no documentation of the resident's environmental assessment was reported. A continued review of the report revealed the resident's physiological factors included confusion, impaired memory, and incontinence. Further review of the facility's incident report revealed on [DATE], the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) met and discussed the resident's fall with injury. The IDT concluded the root cause of the resident's fall was the resident's desire for a position change.
A continued review of the Nurse's Progress Notes, dated [DATE] at 3:05 PM, revealed the nurse heard someone yelling for help from the dining room. The resident was found lying on his/her right side, with his/her wheelchair beside him/her. The resident was observed to have a skin tear with bleeding from his/her left lower extremity. Further review revealed the resident's legs were contracted or smaller than the other leg.
Review of Resident #1's Hospital admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted with his/her status post fall from a wheelchair. Continued review revealed the resident was highly demented and x-ray imaging revealed a nondisplaced fracture of proximal tibial metaphysis; bilateral tibial fracture, and right distal fibula avulsion fractures. Further review of the hospital records revealed no surgical intervention was recommended. An additional review revealed the resident was positive for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI).
Review of Resident #1's Physician Orders, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was ordered to receive Hospice Services beginning [DATE].
Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #35, in a telephonic interview, on [DATE] at 8:15 PM, stated she worked for the facility in 2022. She stated she did not provide direct care to Resident #1; however, she recalled the resident yelling in the dining room, and he/she was found on the floor with a skin tear to his/her head. She stated another resident stated Resident #1 had requested to go back to bed for several hours, scooting himself/herself down in his/her wheelchair. CNA #35 added, if a resident was attempting to get up on their own and requesting to go back to bed, there would be a greater risk of a fall when the care plan was not followed.
Interview on [DATE] at 5:00 PM with CNA #11, stated she worked the 200-unit and was familiar with Resident #1. She stated she believed he/she was the type of resident that tried to get up on his/her own and attempted to get out of bed and his/her wheelchair. CNA #11 recalled staff had gotten the resident up in a wheelchair sometime before lunch, that was all she could recall. Further, she stated if a resident requested to go back to bed, staff, should be proactive and respect the resident's request. She stated it was the resident's right and the staff's responsibility to promote and ensure resident safety to prevent injuries.
During an interview on [DATE] at 8:53 PM with Nurse Aide (NA) #1, she stated she worked at the facility from [DATE] thru [DATE]. NA #1 stated she was familiar with Resident #1 and recalled the resident liked to get up and eat breakfast in the dining room with his/her sister, who was also a resident at the facility. She added, on the day of the incident, Resident #1 was up in his/her wheelchair for both breakfast and lunch and the resident was fine for a while as he/she napped in his/her wheelchair, then around lunch between 12:00 PM to 12:30 PM, a CNA told the resident she was going to change the resident and put him/her back to bed. NA #1 recalled pulling Resident #1 up in his/her chair numerous times, due to the resident wiggling in his/her wheelchair and recalled the resident asking to go back to bed about twenty (20) minutes prior to lunch. NA #1 stated the resident fell in the dining room later that afternoon. NA #1 stated all the staff was trying to monitor the residents in the dining room, with no specific designated staff to monitor. Additionally, NA #1 stated staff heard the resident hit the floor, he/she yelled as the wheelchair hit the dining room table. NA #1 stated Resident #1 was put at risk for a fall from the beginning when he/she had requested to go back to bed and demonstrated restless/anxious behavior.
In an interview, on [DATE] at 4:45 PM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #7, she stated she was employed at the facility from [DATE] thru [DATE]. She stated she had only worked on the 200-unit a couple of days when Resident #1 had a fall. RN #7 stated Resident #1 was up in his/her wheelchair between 11:00 AM to 3:30 PM. RN #7 stated she was monitoring/watching the resident, in the dining room; however, the resident had requested to go to bed, but RN #7 was in/out of the resident's rooms, passing medications and informed the resident, just a second, let me get a CNA to put you back to bed. RN #7 stated, she looked around and found a student to locate a CNA to assist with putting the resident back to bed. She stated, I was afraid the resident would get up and fall, and instructed the resident to not get up because she knew the resident had a fall prior. RN #7 stated she was the only nurse on the floor as the other nurse had gone on lunch break. She stated she continued to pass out medications to other residents.
2. Review of Resident #16's Admissions Medical Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia/Hypercapnia, Anxiety, and Depression.
Review of Resident #16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no history of falls since admission and was assessed to have a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15), which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment also indicated Resident #16 was assessed for oxygen therapy. Continued review of the MDS assessment revealed the resident was independent with bed mobility, personal hygiene, transfers, and toileting. Continued review revealed the resident was assessed to require one (1) person assistance with bathing and one (1) person assistance with a walker out of his/her room for ambulation.
Review of Resident #16's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated [DATE] revealed the resident was care planned for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), self-care performance deficit related to weakness, impaired mobility, impaired gait/balance pain, and shortness of air (SOA). Further review revealed interventions included: the resident was independent with his/her walker in his/her room for ambulation, assistance upon request for locomotion, independent with bed mobility, personal hygiene, transfers, and toileting. Additional interventions were added on [DATE] for staff to assist with ADLs per the resident's request and when increased SOA. A continued review of the resident's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed the resident was care planned to be at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems, and medication regimen. Further review revealed interventions included: staff was to ensure the resident's call light was within reach, encourage resident to always wear nonskid footwear and Physical Therapy (PT) was to evaluate and treat as ordered or as needed (PRN).
Review of the facility's Incident Audit Report, dated [DATE] at 8:07 PM, revealed Resident #16's roommate yelled for help. Review of the report revealed the Kentucky Medication Aide (KMA) was walking down the hallway and went into the resident's room. Resident #16 was noted sitting on his/her buttock on the bathroom floor with his/her back against the wall. A continued review of the report revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #1 noted the resident had his/her socks on that was not his/her nonskid socks. The resident stated he/she tripped over his/her oxygen cord. Further review of the report revealed the resident hit his/her head on the wall. He/she further stated his/her oxygen cord pulled causing the resident to trip over it. Review of the immediate action taken revealed an order was received to send the resident to the emergency room (ER).
Additional review of the incident report, dated [DATE] at 8:07 PM, revealed the resident refused to go to the ER. Further review of the Report revealed a new order to send the resident to the ER if the resident changed his/her mind and the resident was educated on the proper footwear, and safety with oxygen tubing. Continued review of Resident #16's incident report revealed improper footwear was noted as predisposing situational factors. On [DATE] IDT reviewed the resident incident form and concluded the root cause of the resident's fall was the Lack of non-skid footwear. Further, interventions revealed staff were educated on the nonskid footwear for the resident. The facility; however, failed to address the resident's concern with tripping over his/her oxygen tubing.
Review of Resident #16's Hospital emergency room Record, dated [DATE] at 4:01 PM, revealed an emergency room (ER) Primary Impression/Diagnosis was a Displaced Fracture of shaft of the left clavicle related to an unspecified fall, initial encounter.
Review of Resident #16's Diagnostic Imaging plain film of his/her left shoulder impression, dated [DATE], revealed a chronic left Clavicle Fracture with displacement.
Review of Resident #16's Comprehensive Care Plan was updated on [DATE], after the resident's fall, to include interventions for staff to ensure the resident was educated on the resident wearing proper nonskid footwear. The facility identified the root cause of the resident's fall on [DATE] and ordered the resident a retractable oxygen (O2) tubing.
3. Review of Resident #17's admission Medical Record revealed the facility admitted the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's with Dementia, Asthma, Atrial Fibrillation, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
Review of Resident #17's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident had no history of falls since admission. Further, the resident was assessed to have a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, which indicated the resident's interview was unsuccessful. Continued review of the MDS revealed the resident was assessed to require an extensive assistance of two (2) staff members for bed mobility, bathing, transfers, and toileting.
Review of Resident #17's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated [DATE], revealed the resident required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's); required assistance of two (2) staff for bed mobility, transfers, and bathing. The resident was Care Plan for being non-ambulatory. Review of the resident's care plan related to falls revealed the resident was care planned to be a falls risk related to his/her new environment, balance problems related to weakness, use of psychotropic medication, poor safety awareness and behaviors. Interventions included staff were to ensure the resident's call light was within reach when in his/her room, hands-on assistance with transfers, and observe for falls related to his/her side effects from psychotropic medications such as increased drowsiness or dizziness, and staggering gait. Continued review revealed Resident #17 was care planned for altered psychosocial needs related to dementia with interventions for staff to monitor the resident's behavior every shift and document if noted, provide non-pharmacological interventions such as 1:1 supervision.
Review of Resident #17's facility Incident Audit Report dated [DATE] at 12:49 AM revealed the resident was lying on the floor, on his/her back beside the bed. Further review, revealed the resident rolled out of the bed, hitting his/her face on the floor, with lacerations and a hematoma to his/her forehead. The resident complained of increased pain. Further review revealed the resident reported rolling out of bed face first, hitting his/her nose and forehead. The incident report revealed the resident remained oriented to person and situation. Continued review revealed confusion and impaired memory were noted as predisposing physiological factors with no evidence of other predisposing environmental, nor situational factors, and/or documented interviews to demonstrate a thorough investigation. A continued review of the incident report revealed the immediate action taken was to assist the resident to bed, apply pressure to the resident's wound, and the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) for an evaluation.
Review of Resident #17's Hospital Medical Record, dated on [DATE] at 12:37 AM, revealed the resident was triaged with a complaint of a fall with facial lacerations.
A review of the resident's ED Disposition after Triage dictated by the emergency room (ER) Physician at 12:37 AM on [DATE] revealed the resident fell at approximately 12:10 AM and it was an unwitnessed fall with lacerations noted to his/her forehead and the bridge of the resident's nose was bleeding but was stopped prior to his/her arrival to the hospital. Review of the physician's documentation also revealed the resident had a vertical directed forehead laceration which measured 2.5 centimeters (cm) in length. The physician further documented that the forehead skin laceration was repaired with skin glue. Continued review of Resident #17's hospital record revealed a Preliminary Radiology Report for a CT scan revealed an acute minimally displaced nasal fracture and nasal septum.
4. Review of Resident #18's admission Medical Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Atrial Fibrillation, Alzheimer's/Dementia, Cardiovascular Accident (CVA) with right side hemiplegia, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, and Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) without dialysis.
Review of Resident #18's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident was assessed with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of twelve (12), which indicated the resident was moderately impaired. The assessment also indicated Resident #18, had a history of falls since admission with injury. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed the resident required extensive assistance of two (2) persons physical assistance for transfers, bed mobility, bathing, and toileting.
Review of Resident #18's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated [DATE], revealed staff identified that the resident was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems, and use [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policy, and review of the facility's Administrator's Job Description, it was determined the facility failed to be administered in a manner w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policy, and review of the facility's Administrator's Job Description, it was determined the facility failed to be administered in a manner which enabled its effective use of its resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident.
The facility was cited at the S/S of Immediate Jeopardy during the 06/10/2023 survey. Review of the 02/10/2020 Recertification Survey's Plan of Correction (POC), and the Abbreviated Survey's POC revealed the facility was previously cited at actual harm and Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The 06/10/2023 survey had repeat deficiencies that had been cited on the 02/10/2020 survey.
Review of the fall tracker revealed the facility had a total of one-hundred and eight (108) falls within a four (4) month time period. Of the 108 falls, thirty-three (33) falls resulted in injuries.
The facility's Administrator failed to have an effective system in place to investigate the root cause of the residents' falls; failed to develop and implement an action plan after each fall or when there was a change in the resident's condition; and failed to accurately assess the resident and/or residents' environment to determine whether adequate supervision and/or assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents.
In addition, the facility was cited six (6) Immediate Jeopardy deficiencies and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) during this survey.
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 05/26/2023 and was determined to exist on 07/08/2022 at 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care; (F689) Free from Accidents/Hazards/Supervision/Devices; 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans ( F656), 42 CFR 483.70 Administration (F835), 42 CFR 483.70 Governing Body (F837), 42 CFR 483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement QAPI/QAA program (F867) and at 42 CFR 483.70 Medical Director (F841).
Substandard Quality of Care was identified at 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care; (F689) Free from Accidents/Hazards/Supervision/Devices. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 05/26/2023.
An acceptable removal plan was received on 06/07/2023. The State Survey Agency determined the immediacy had been removed, 06/01/2023, as alleged, prior to exit on 06/10/2023. Non-compliance remained in the areas of 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care (F689) at a S/S of an E; 42 CFR Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans (F656) at a S/S of an E; 42 CFR 483.70 Administration (F835) at a S/S of an E; 42 CFR 483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program (F867) at a S/S of an E; 42 CFR 483.70 Governing Body (F837) at a S/S of an E; and 42 CFR 483.70 Medical Director (F841) at a S/S of an E.
Additional deficient practice was also identified at F583 at a S/S of an E; F600 at S/S of a D; and F602 at S/S of a D; and F761 at a S/S of an E.
Refer to F656; F689; F837; F841; and F867.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Administrator, revised April 2007, revealed the licensed Administrator was responsible for the day-to-day functions of the facility. Continued review revealed the facility's governing body had appointed the Administrator who was dually licensed in accordance with current federal and state requirements. The Administrator was responsible for: Management of day-to-day functions in the facility; residents' rights to fair and equitable treatment, self-determination, individuality, etc.; implementation of established resident care policies and other operational policies and procedures necessary to maintain compliance with current laws, regulations and guidelines governing long-term care facilities; liaison to the governing board, medical staff; and other professional and supervisory staff; evaluation and implementation of recommendations from the facility's committees (Quality Assessment and Assurance); ensure adequate number of personnel employed to meet residents' needs; and, ensuring the facility admitted residents whom it could provide adequate care.
Review of the facility's, Job Description for the Administrator, undated, revealed the Administrator directed and performed quality assessment and assurance functions, oversight of the facility's Quality assurance process, including but not limited to regulatory compliance rounds to monitor performance and to continuously improve quality. Implementation of programs to gather and analyze data for trends and to institute actions to resolve problems promptly. Further review revealed the Administrator reported and made recommendations to appropriate committees to include the Governing Body and Medical Director. Continued review revealed the Administrator ensured adherence to proper safety procedures, including but not limited to, prompt investigation and reporting of injury. Ensured proper documentation was maintained, including but not limited to, documentation of investigations, incidents, meetings, staff training and education, to include QAPI improvement plans. The job description further revealed the Administrator developed and updated policies and procedures to reflect the philosophy of the facility, professional standards, and legal requirements.
Review of the 02/20/2020, Recertification Survey's POC revealed previously cited deficiencies, included F689, Quality of Care: Free from Accidents/Hazards/Supervision/Devices. The facility failed to have an effective system in place to investigate the root cause of the residents' falls, failed to develop and implement an action plan after each fall or when there was a change in the resident's condition, and failed to accurately assess the resident and/or residents' environment to determine whether adequate supervision and/or assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents associated with falls.
Based on observations, interview and record review throughout the survey, revealed the Administrator failed to develop and/or implement an effective system to ensure person-centered Comprehensive Care Plans (CCP) which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment related to falls and supervision; failed to develop and implement care plans related to resident specific guidelines of equipment; (LAL) mattresses and oxygen tubing.
Further, the facility failed to provide effective Administrative and Governing body oversight of day-to-day operations of the facility and failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance Program to provide quality care and services to meet the needs of the residents.
During interview on 05/24/2023 at 9:30 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated she had been in the DON role since March 2023, and since the last month or so (no specific date provided), she directly reported to the Executive Director (ED). She stated she was involved with care conferences (morning clinical meeting) related to residents' falls and incidents; observe the environment and update the care plan with resident involvement. The DON stated falls were QA'd (Quality Assurance) and discussed, all the data would continue to be QA'd, once a month on Thursday with the physician's involvement. She stated that however, the normal previous routine/procedure, the QA process was to conduct a through chart review and room check; no resident specific discussion. The DON stated her job was to provide oversight to the nursing department and report any concerns to the Administrator. Additionally, she stated she was responsible for the care needs of the facility's residents and supervision of its nursing staff. The DON stated she ensured residents received the necessary care and services and provided the supervision of nursing staff. Further interview revealed the [NAME] President of Clinical Operations and the [NAME] President of Operations (VPO) had been present in the building daily and provided support, education and resources.
The Medical Director (MD), stated during interview on 05/05/2022 at 2:30 PM, that in his role as the Medical Director he would coordinate care and if issues were discovered, he would communicate with the Executive Director (ED). The MD further stated that he would expect the staff to follow the residents' plans of care and implement the interventions as ordered. He stated they knew what the problems were, as well as the residents' patterns; unfortunately, they did not follow through. In addition, the MD stated the facility had a high turnover rate and it was difficult to build a system with inconsistent staffing, that was not trained nor educated on the proper care needs of the residents. He further stated this contributed to the increase in falls. However, the MD stated he was engaged in the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) metrics related to falls trending upwards.
During interview on 06/10/2023 at 9:44 AM, with the Executive Director (ED), she stated she had been in the role since July 2022 and was responsible for the day-to-day functioning of the facility and was responsible to ensure the facility operated within the state and federal guidelines and maintained regulatory compliance regarding previously cited deficiencies. She also stated she was the Quality Assurance Coordinator and was responsible for the program. In addition, she stated she was required to ensure the ongoing audits related to previously cited deficiencies were reviewed, and if any concerns were identified, they were corrected immediately. The ED stated the facility had put audits in place; however, the facility was focused on the tracking and trending of previous falls specific to the facility's percentages and numbers, not resident specific as to the change with the current Plan of Correction (POC). The ED stated, We were not establishing the actual root cause, neglecting the overall 'resident specific' picture/part, nor the collaborative involvement that was needed, in order to get down to the actual root cause of the fall; therefore, missing the most important parts and potentially putting the residents at higher risk. Currently, a more specific procedure was in place to ensure an immediate and thorough investigation starting with staff education. This included agency staff and a more in-depth education process prior to working, more thorough interviews, resident environmental aspect, resident behaviors, fall risk/history starting from admission and most importantly, to ensure the correct interventions for the right resident. Consequently, if these factors were not addressed as previous, it put the resident at risk with a negative outcome, that could have been prevented.
Interview on 06/10/2023 at 10:28 PM, with the [NAME] President of Operations (VPO) revealed he started with the corporation on 05/30/2023. He stated he provided in person oversight to include the Executive Director (ED) and [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) starting 05/31/2023. He stated he was involved with the revisions of the POC on 06/05/2023. The VPO stated his role was to provide general operational oversight; policy review and revision, preventive measures to ensure understanding with standards of care, policies and implementation. The VPO stated, the difference in the facility corrections from 2020 falls plan of correction (POC) compared to the current POC, was education with the importance and focus of the root cause analysis; looking into the injuries, appropriate risk factors, starting from the admission process and ensuring proper resident specific preventive measures were in place and sustained. He added, these preventive measures should have already been implemented and a part of the process. However, the procedure moving forward was now to promote resident reviews with the audit and reeducate the staff to include Agency, prior to onboarding, thorough evaluations of risk and appropriateness of interventions, and of importance to look at the resident and address the injuries. In addition, he added the facility's number one goal was to educate at the best of their ability, try to reduce Agency staffing; make accountable for their actions and dismiss the wrong, control the environment, reeducate staff daily and prioritize importance of resident safety and quality of care.
Interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, with [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) revealed she was a member of the facility's Governing Body (GB), which included the ED and VPO, per policy. The VPCO stated her role was to provide facility oversight and ED guidance and education of policies and procedures. She stated she was onsite beginning 05/17/2023, to provide support to staff while the State Survey Agency was in the building with concerns. Additionally, since 05/17/2023 she had been in the facility, periodically attended QAPI, provided a lot of on the spot training; researched QAPI tools to provide education and procedure with root cause analysis, facility trending to increase resident supervision, initiate proper procedure for staff to notify the ED, DON and self, to ensure the investigation was proper. The VPCO stated the facility's failure related to falls, was because there was no system in place. She stated she felt the facility was looking at contributing factors instead of the root cause of the fall, neglecting the resident's needs and not investigating the why did the fall happen, in order to promote a thorough investigation. The VPCO stated the staff were attempting to identify the root cause; however, they needed to provide a more appropriate root cause. She stated there was the need for education on the importance of a system wide approach and how to improve the interviews; the nurse would include their part, but now we need to include the pre-fall with other staff and ensure an immediate investigation/action was performed related to the root cause, with appropriate immediate interventions, and more supervision. Additionally, a new Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) committee was initiated.
The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on 06/07/2023, alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/01/2023. Review of the Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan revealed the facility implemented the following:
1. Beginning 05/19/2023, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) re-educated the Executive Director (ED), the Director of Nursing (DON) and the staff Development Coordinator (SDC) on the facility's fall policy. This education included: ensure completion of fall risk assessments on admission, quarterly, and with significant change in the resident's condition; ensure that care plans interventions were implemented based on findings of the fall risk assessment; implement an immediate intervention following each fall including a root cause analysis; and discussion by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to review/update the resident's care plan following each fall for further interventions to include the need for increased supervision or assistive devices as deemed necessary.
2. a.) On 05/19/2023, the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON) ensured that the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) started re-educating all current Licensed Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on the facility's fall policy. The education included, but was not limited to initiating an investigation as to the cause of the fall, implementing an immediate intervention with consideration of the need for increased supervision or the addition of assistive devices, and reviewing/updating the care plan with each fall.
b.) Education also included that low air loss mattress settings would be compatible with resident's weight, comfort and appropriate functioning of the mattress.
c.) Documentation was added to the electronic medical record (EMR) for verification of low air loss mattress settings every shift to ensure that it remained at the appropriate level for each resident.
d.) Staff was educated that residents who required the use of an air loss mattress would require two (2) staff members to assist with turning and repositioning in bed to decrease the risk of falls, and to notify the Nurse Manager if changes were needed regarding the support surface.
e.) Newly hired staff, agency staff and staff who had not been educated by 05/31/2023 would receive this education prior to working their next shift.
3. Beginning 05/22/2023, a post education test was administered by the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Unit Managers (UM) for all current Licensed Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) following education to ensure care plan interventions were in place.
a.) If a score of 100 percent (100%) was not obtained, re-education would be completed until proficiency was obtained, until score of 100%.
b.) Staff members not working on 05/22/2023 would have the education provided and a post-test completed prior to working in the facility.
c.) Agency staff and staff on leave of absence would have the education provided and be required to complete the post-test prior to working in the facility.
d.) Findings of the tests would be reviewed by the Executive Director (ED) and/or Director of Nursing (DON) to ensure compliance.
4. a.) On 05/22/2023, the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON) ensured the DON/ADON/UM/Nursing Supervisor/Licensed Nurse would complete visual observation rounds on six (6) residents daily across all shifts and all units including weekends and holidays, to ensure care plan interventions were in place to decrease the risk of falls/injuries times two (2) weeks, then six (6) observations three (3) times a week for two (2) weeks, then six (6) observations weekly times four (4) weeks, then six (6) residents monthly until further recommendations by the QAPI committee. The QAPI Committee include: the Executive Director (ED), the Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Preventionist (IP), Maintenance Director, Human Resource Business Partner (HRBP) and the Medical Director (MD).
b.) Findings would be reported by a member of the IDT as listed above and would report daily in the QAPI meeting to the Director of Nursing and/or Executive Director to ensure compliance and that corrective actions had been initiated.
c.) Residents would be selected by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) and/or DON to ensure residents identified at high risk for falls would be reviewed at least once in the two (2) week cycle.
d.) Corrective action would be completed immediately and staff would be reeducated to ensure care plan interventions were in place to decrease the risk of falls/injuries.
5. On 05/23/2023, the Executive Director (ED) ensured that a review was conducted by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS), Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and Unit Manager (UM) for all current residents' who have experienced a fall within the last 90 days to ensure appropriate notification of physician, responsible party, completion of a root cause analysis, care plan interventions were updated to reflect current needs identified during the root cause analysis, and completion of neurological checks as indicated. Corrective actions were completed as indicated.
6. On 05/23/2023, Managers and Department Leaders, consisting of the ED, DON, ADON, SDC, Activities Director (AD), Business Office Manager (BOM), Social Services Director (SSD), Social Services Coordinator/Assistant (SSA), Unit Manager (UM), Medical Records Coordinator (MRC), and the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) completed visual rounds to compare and ensure the residents' care plans/Kardex falls interventions were in place for residents with falls in the last 90 days and ensure interventions were identified and placed on the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) Kardex and were implemented to decrease the risk of falls.
7. a.) Beginning 05/23/2023, the DON, ADON, or Unit Manager (UM) would perform Quality Assurance review audits for residents who experienced a fall to ensure a root cause analysis had been completed with appropriate interventions implemented, the care plan was reviewed/updated, ensure interventions in place and listed on the CNAs Kardex or Point of Care (POC) documentation in electronic medical record (EMR), and follow up documentation was completed by the end of the 72 hours post fall period daily in the QAPI meeting.
b.) Areas of concern would be addressed immediately or education or increase in audits.
c.) Findings would be reported to the Executive Director (ED) and the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee daily times two (2) weeks, then weekly times four (4) weeks, then monthly thereafter or as determined by the QAPI committee.
8. On 05/29/2023, the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON) received education provided by the Chief Operating Officer (COO) regarding their responsibility to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident.
9. On 05/29/2023, the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON) received education by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) on the past three (3) year's survey history; the policies for falls; accident investigation to include root cause analysis utilizing CMS five (5) Whys, care plan development, care plan revision; the roles and expectations of the administration of the facility; the roles and responsibility of the Governing Body (GB); the roles and responsibilities of the Medical Director (MD), and roles and responsibilities of the Quality Assurance and Improvement (QAPI) committee.
10. a.) On 05/29/2023, the Executive Director (ED) ensured that the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Unit Manager (UM), and the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) conducted a review of the falls for Residents #16, #17, #18, and #19 within the last 90 days with a root cause analysis completed or updated as indicated.
b.) Review of each resident included an assessment of the resident and the resident's environment to determine the need for increased supervision and/or assistive devices were needed to avoid further accidents.
c.) Updated interventions were added to the care plans for Residents #16, #17, #18, and #19 related to the findings of the root cause analysis as indicated on 05/30/2023.
11. a.) Beginning 05/29/2023, an Ad hoc (prime contractor for CMS Website Development Support (CMS WDS) program, which covered many public-facing portions of HealthCare.gov.) A QAPI meeting by the ED, DON, VPCS, Infection Preventionist (IP), Social Service Director (SSD), and Licensed Nurse, was held with the Medical Director (MD) on 05/29/2023 to discuss the above stated plan to ensure care plan interventions were implemented and continued to be in place for residents to decrease the risk of falls/injuries.
b.) Findings of audits and corrective actions were discussed, no further recommendations were made by the MD at that time.
12. On 05/29/2023, a Stand-down QAPI meeting was held daily by the Executive Director to review the above stated, to discuss findings of audits of plans for F656, F657, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867, and determine concerns that may require immediate action. Corrective actions would be initiated immediately.
13. Starting 05/29/2023, a QAPI meeting was held daily times two (2) weeks, then weekly for four (4) weeks, then monthly to ensure continued compliance with the above stated plan with follow-up and recommendations by the governing body, appropriate interventions by the Medical Director (MD), and an effective QAPI to decrease the risk of falls/injuries, for recommendations and further follow-up as indicated.
14. a.) On 05/29/2023, the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON) initiated the plan that beginning 05/25/2023, the Clinical Interdisciplinary Team would review residents who experienced a fall during the morning clinical meeting to ensure a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was determined, all appropriate interventions to include: consideration of the need for increased supervision and/or assistive devices as deemed appropriate were implemented to assist in preventing further falls, review and update the care plan as appropriate, and ensure intervention was on the Care Plan/CNA Kardex.
b.) The DON/ADON/SDC/UM would make an IDT Nurse's Note with the root cause of the fall and intervention that was in place, and add any further interventions recommended by IDT. If further recommendations were suggested, the Licensed Nurse would add to the care plan.
c.) A Nurse Manager would validate that the intervention was in place daily in the QAPI meeting. The IDT would evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention(s) and for latent injuries related to the fall daily in the QAPI meeting.
d.) The Director of Nursing (DON) would be responsible for ensuring the above meeting was completed as per the plan.
The State Survey Agency (SSA) verified the facility implemented the following corrective actions with the removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/01/2023:
1. Interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, with the VPCS indicated on 05/19/2023, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) re-educated the Executive Director (ED), the Director of Nursing (DON) and the staff Development Coordinator (SDC) on the facility's fall policy to include ensuring completion of fall risk assessments on admission, quarterly, and with significant change in the resident's condition, ensuring that care plan interventions were implemented based on the findings of the fall risk assessment, implementing an immediate intervention following each fall including a root cause analysis, and discussion by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to review/update the resident's care plan following each fall for further interventions to include the need for increased supervision or assistive devices as deemed necessary.
2. a.) Review of staff education sheets and staff interviews revealed on 05/19/2023, the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON) ensured that the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) started re-educating all current Licensed Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on the facility's fall policy, including but not limited to initiating an investigation as to the cause of the fall, implementing an immediate intervention with consideration of the need for increased supervision or the addition of assistive devices, and reviewing/updating the care plan with each fall.
b.) Education also included that low air loss mattress settings were compatible with resident's weight, comfort and appropriate functioning of the mattress.
c.) Observation and record review revealed documentation was added to the electronic medical record (EMR) for verification of low air loss mattress settings every shift to ensure that it remained at the appropriate level for each resident.
d.) Staff was educated that residents who required the use of an air loss mattress would require two (2) staff members to assist with turning and repositioning in bed to decrease the risk of falls, and to notify the Nurse Manager if changes were needed regarding the support surface.
e.) Newly hired staff, agency staff and staff who had not been educated by 05/31/2023 received this education prior to working their next shift.
3. Review of staff education sheets and interview on 06/09/2023 at 3:05 PM, with the SDC revealed that beginning 05/22/2023, a post education test was administered by the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Unit Managers (UM) for all current Licensed Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) following education to ensure care plan interventions were in place.
a.) If a score of 100 percent (100%) was not obtained, re-education was completed until proficiency was obtained, until score of 100%.
b.) Staff members not working on 05/22/2023, had the education via in-person or phone communication provided and a post-test was completed and verified prior to working in the facility.
c.) Agency staff and staff on leave of absence had the education provided via in-person or phone communication and required completed post-test prior to working in the facility was verified and validated on 06/09/2023.
d.) Findings of the tests were reviewed by the Executive Director (ED) and/or Director of Nursing (DON) to ensure compliance.
Interview on 06/09/2023 at 3:05 PM, with the SDC stated she had been re-educated on the Care Plan policy per the VPCS and explained the importance of care plan interventions to decrease the risk of resident falls.
3. Review of staff education sheets revealed on 05/19/2023, the SDC started re-educating all the current Licensed Nurses and Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) on the facility's care plan policy, to include ensuring that interventions were implemented and in place to decrease the risk of falls. Staff interviews on 06/09/2023 and 06/10/2023 revealed the staff were educated prior to working in the facility.
Interview with LPN #15 on 06/09/2023 at 3:45 PM, revealed she had received education on fall risk, accidents/incidents, abuse, low air loss mattress, correct orders with settings and Kardex training in-services to ensure safety for fall risk residents.
Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #6, on 06/09/2023 at 5:00 PM, revealed she had recent education on 06/04/2023 on fall risk residents related to care plan interventions in place and correct documentation. This included resident rights and low air loss mattress orders and settings to ensure resident safety.
Interview with Certified Nurse Aide #4 on 06/09/2023 at 4:07 PM, revealed recent training on falls risk; low air loss mattress; abuse; and residents' rights on 06/04/2023. The training also included to ensure the Kardex was to be looked at every for resident's needs and to verify fall risk residents.
4. a.) Review of the facility's documentation to include meeting minutes revealed on 05/22/2023, the Executive Director (ED) and the Director of Nursing (DON) ensured the DON/ADON/UM/Nursing Supervisor/Licensed Nurses completed visual observational rounds on six (6) residents daily across all shifts and all units including weekends and holidays, to ensure care plan interventions were in place to decrease the risk of falls/injuries times two (2) weeks, then six (6) observations three (3) times a week for two (2) weeks, then six (6) observations weekly times four (4) weeks, then six (6) residents monthly until further recommendations by the QAPI committee consisting of the Executive Director (ED), the Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Preventionist (IP), Maintenance Director, Human Resource Business Partner (HRBP) and with the Medical Director (MD).
b.) Findings were reported by a member of the IDT as listed above and were reported daily in the QAPI meeting to the Director of Nursing and/or Executive Director to ensure compliance and that corrective actions had been initiated.
c.) Residents were selected by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) and/or the DON to ensure residents identified at high risk for falls were reviewed at least once in the two (2) week cycle.
d.) Corrective actions were completed immediately, and staff were reeducated to ensure care plan interventions were in place to decrease the risk of falls/injuries.
Interview on 06/09/2023 at 4:00 PM, with the SSD stated there were daily QAPI meetings with the ED and VPCS to go over falls, governing body, and care plans. She stated she received education on falls/incidents/air mattress/PIP, and QAPI. The SSD stated she felt it had been beneficial. She stated the QAPI and PIP were not well known to staff, n[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0837
(Tag F0837)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure its Governing Body was actively engaged in ensuring its policies were effectivel...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure its Governing Body was actively engaged in ensuring its policies were effectively implemented regarding the management and operation of the facility. The facility's Governing Body failed to ensure the facility sustained substantial compliance in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan, F656; 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, Free from Accidents/Hazards/Supervision/Devices, F689; 42 CFR 483.70 Administration, (F835); 42 CFR 483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), F865; 42 CFR 483.70 Governing Body, F837; and 42 CFR 483.70 Medical Director, F841.
In addition,, review of the facility's fall tracker documentation revealed the facility noted a total of one-hundred and eight (108) falls occurred within a four (4) month time period. Of the one-hundred and eight (108) falls, thirty-three (33) of the falls resulted in injuries to the resident.
(Refer to F656, F689, F835, and F867)
The facility's failure to have an effective system to ensure its Governing Body was actively engaged in ensuring its policies were effectively implemented regarding the management and operation of the facility has caused or is likely to cause serious harm or serious injury to the residents.
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 05/26/2023 and was determined to exist on 07/08/2022 in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan, Develop/Implement Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plans, (F656) at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, Accidents and Supervision (F689) at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR 483.70 Administration (F835, F837, and F841), at a S/S of a K; and 42 CFR 483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, (F867) at a S/S of a K. Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) was identified at 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, Accidents and Supervision (F689). The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 05/26/2023.
The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on 06/07/2023, with the facility alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/01/2023. The State Survey Agency (SSA) validated removal of the Immediate Jeopardy, as alleged on 06/01/2023, prior to exit on 06/10/2023.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Governing Body, undated, revealed the Governing Body in accordance with 42 CFR Section 483.70(d), appointed the designated Administrator. Per review, the Administrator, who was licensed by the State, was responsible for the management of the facility and was to report to and be accountable to the Governing Body. Continued review revealed the policy stated the Governing Body was responsible for and accountable for the facility's QAPI Program. The policy further noted the Governing Body was to fulfill its referenced duties through a combination of onsite visits; Zoom or telephonic conferences; and performance of audits, performed on a scheduled and/or an as-needed basis In addition, the policy revealed the facility's Governing Body was responsible for and accountable for its QAPI Program.
During the Recertification Survey, dated 03/05/2020 the facility was cited at 42 CFR 483.21 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan, F656 and 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, Free from Accidents/Hazards/Supervision/Devices, F689, at a Scope and Severity (S/S) of a K. During the current survey Immediate Jeopardy was again identified in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan, F656 and 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, Free from Accidents/Hazards/Supervision/Devices, F689, at a S/S of a K.
In an interview on 05/05/2022 at 2:30 PM, the Medical Director stated his role as Medical Director was to coordinate care and if issues were discovered, he communicated with the facility's Executive Director (ED). The Medical Director stated he expected facility staff to follow residents' plans of care and implement their interventions as ordered. He stated staff knew what residents' problems were, as well as the resident's patterns; unfortunately; however, the facility had not followed through with necessary interventions. Per the Medical Director, the facility had a high staff turnover rate and it was difficult to build an effective system with inconsistent staffing, who were not trained nor educated on the proper care needs of the residents. He further stated the high turnover rate and inconsistent staffing who were not trained and educated on residents' care needs contributed to the increase in falls. The Medical Director stated however, he was engaged in the facility's QAPI metrics regarding residents' falls trending upwards.
In an interview on 06/10/2023 at 9:44 AM, the ED stated she was responsible for the facility's day to day functioning and was responsible for ensuring it operated within state and federal guidelines and maintained regulatory compliance regarding previously cited deficiencies. She stated she was the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) Coordinator and was responsible for the QA program. The ED stated she was required to ensure ongoing audits related to previously cited deficiencies were reviewed, and if any concerns were identified, they were corrected immediately. According to the ED, the facility had implemented audits and revealed the facility had been focused on tracking and trending previous falls specific to the facility's percentages and numbers, and not on resident specific falls. Per the ED, currently, a more specific procedure has been initiated to ensure an immediate and thorough investigation starting with staff education, to include agency staff and a more in-depth education process prior to working, more thorough interviews, reviewing resident environmental factors, resident behaviors, fall risk/history starting from admission and most importantly, to ensure the correct interventions for the right resident. The ED further stated consequently, due to those factors not being addressed as previously, it put the resident at risk for a negative outcome, which could have been prevented.
In an interview on 06/10/2023 at 10:28 PM, the [NAME] President of Operations (VPO) stated he started with the corporation on 05/30/2023. He stated he provided in person oversight to the facility's Governing Body, to include the ED and [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) starting 05/31/2023, and had been involved with the revisions of the POC on 06/05/2023. The VPO stated his role was to provide general operational oversight; policy review and revision; and preventive measures to ensure understanding with standards of care, policies and implementation. He stated the difference in the facility's corrections from the 2020 falls POC was the education; focusing on the importance of ensuring a root cause analysis and looking into injuries; assessing appropriate risk factors starting from the admission process and ensuring proper resident specific preventive measures were in place and sustained. According to the VPO, those preventive measures should have already been implemented by the facility previously and been a part of its process. He stated however, the procedure moving forward was now to promote resident review with audits; and reeducation of staff to include all agency staff prior to beginning work, regarding thorough evaluations of residents' risk and appropriateness of their interventions, and of the importance of assessing the resident and addressing their injuries. In addition, he stated the facility's number one (1) goal was educating staff to the best of its ability on a daily basis; trying to reduce the use of agency staffing; having accountability for its actions and controlling the environment, and prioritizing the importance of resident safety and quality of care.
In an interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, the VPCO stated she was a member of the facility's Governing Body which also included the ED and VPO, as per policy. The VPCO stated her role was to provide oversight of the facility and guidance for the ED and education regarding policies and procedures. She stated she had been onsite beginning 05/17/2023, to provide support for staff while Surveyors were in the building. The VPCO stated on 05/19/2023, she identified there were no orders in place and had performed an audit of residents on air mattresses. She stated after the audit two (2) residents on Low Air Loss (LAL) mattresses had those mattresses discontinued. Per the VPCO, since 05/17/2023 she had been present in the facility providing a lot of on the spot training; periodically attending QAPI meetings; researching QAPI tools to use to provide education and procedure with root cause analysis. She stated she also assisted with facility trending to increase resident supervision; initiating a proper procedure for staff to notify the ED, DON and herself, to ensure the facility's investigation were proper. The VPCO stated the facility's failure related to falls, directly having no system in place, she felt had been from looking at contributing factors instead of the root cause of the falls; neglecting the resident needs; and not investigating the why the fall had happened, in order to promote a thorough investigation. She stated staff had attempted to identify the root cause; however, they needed to provide a more appropriate root cause. The VPCO stated there was a need for education on the importance of a system wide approach and improving interviews. Per the VPCO, nurses had their part; however, now the facility needed to include pre-fall education with other staff and ensure an immediate investigation/action was performed related to the root cause, with appropriate immediate interventions implemented, and more supervision provided. Additionally, she further stated a new Performance Improvement Plan (PIP Committee had been initiated.
The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on 06/07/2023, alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/01/2023. Review of the Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan revealed the facility implemented the following:
1. Beginning on 05/17/2023, a member of the Governing Body would do the following: onsite at a minimum of four (4) days a week and available by phone twenty-four (24) hours a day seven (7) days a week.
(a). Audit incidents and accidents.
(b). Complete a review of investigations of incidents and accidents.
(c). Ensure QAPI processes and procedures that included results of all audits, analysis of audits, identification of Root Cause of system failures, implementation of corrective actions, and tracking and trending of the facility's processes.
2. On 05/19/2023, the ED and DON received education given by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) on the policies for falls, and accident investigation. The education included: root cause analysis; care plan development; and care plan revisions.
3. On 05/29/2023, the VPCS, a member of the Governing Body, reviewed the removal plans with the ED for F656, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867 to ensure understanding of the requirements of each plan and to ensure adherence to the plan(s) to decrease the risk of potential injuries to residents related to falls.
4. (a). Beginning 05/29/2023, a review was to be completed with the ED by a member of the Governing Body that included the VPCO. The VPCS, each week beginning 05/29/2023, would follow up to include audits and plans initiated to correct identified concerns.
(b). The process also included follow-up with staff members, department heads, external consultant, residents and/or families to assist in evaluating ongoing compliance or deficient practices with the removal plan and/or facility processes regarding the regulatory intent of F656, F657, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867.
(c). Any concerns identified regarding review with the ED were to be immediately addressed/corrected by the ED and discussed with another member of the Governing Body (VPCS or VPCO).
(d). Immediate actions were to be taken to ensure the residents' well-being and compliance with the identified regulatory violations. The findings were to be reported to the Chief Operating Officer (COO) starting on 05/29/2023 by the VPO or VPCO weekly.
5. Beginning 05/29/2023, the COO completed education with the members of the Governing Body regarding their roles and responsibilities to provide oversight of the management and operation of the facility to ensure the facility was administered effectively, and to ensure the facility had an effective QAPI program.
6. (a). On 05/29/2023, the ED and DON received education by the VPCS on the roles and expectations of: the administration of the facility, the Governing Body, the Medical Director, and the QAPI Committee.
(b). The VPCS re-educated the ED, DON, and Medical Director on the revised Accidents and Incidents/Falls, Investigating and Reporting policies to include notification of the ED and DON.
(c). On 05/29/2023, a post test was administered to the ED and DON by the VPCS to validate understanding of the above education.
7. (a). Beginning 05/23/2023, an Ad hoc QAPI meeting was held with the Medical Director regarding the plan for consistent reviews by the Governing Body to ensure the removal plans were followed consistently and to discuss the weekly review with the ED as stated above. No further recommendations were made by the Medical Director regarding the plan.
(b). A stand down QAPI meeting was to be held daily by the ED to review the above stated plan, to discuss findings of audits, and determine concerns which might require immediate action.
8. Starting 05/29/2023, a QAPI meeting was to be held daily for two (2) weeks, then weekly times four (4) weeks, then monthly thereafter to ensure continued compliance with the above stated plan to ensure continued compliance with follow-up and recommendations by the Governing Body.
9. (a). On 05/30/2023, the ED provided education to the Department managers which included: the DON, ADON, SDC, UM, MDS Coordinator, SSD, SSC, BOM, AD, DD, RSD, HKS, and MA regarding the roles and responsibilities of the Governing Body.
(b). The education included the availability of the Governing Body with concerns, grievances, or need of resources to assist in ensuring the highest level of care and services to the residents in the facility.
10. (a). On 05/30/2023, the education was initiated with facility staff by the SDC, DON, ADON, Nursing Supervisor or VPCS regarding the roles and responsibilities of the Governing Body.
(b). The education included the availability of the Governing Body with concerns, grievances, or need of resources to assist in ensuring the highest level of care and services to the residents in the facility.
The State Survey Agency (SSA) verified the facility implemented the following corrective actions with the removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/01/2023 as alleged:
1. Per observation and interview, beginning 05/17/2023, a member of the Governing Body was onsite daily at the facility, at a minimum of four (4) days a week and available by phone twenty-four hours a day seven (7) days a week as alleged.
(a). Review of the facility's documentation revealed on 05/17/2023, an audit was conducted of residents' incidents and accidents. Continued review revealed the audit encompassed the investigations and review of the investigation process to ensure the QAPI processes and procedures which included results of all audits, analysis of audits, identification of Root Cause of system failure and implementation of corrective actions, and tracking and trending of the facility's processes were completed.
(b). In an interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, the VPCS stated when the State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyors entered the building on 05/17/2023, with concerns, an audit of residents with falls/incidents/accidents was initiated and conducted. The VPCS stated concerns had been identified regarding no Physician's Orders related to the mattresses. The facility began a thorough audit review at that time to address the concerns.
(c). In continued interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, the VPCS stated she ensured QAPI processes and procedures that included results of all audits, analysis of audits, identification of Root Cause of system failures, implementation of corrective actions, and tracking and trending of facility processes were completed.
2. In interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, the VPCS stated on 05/19/2023, she educated the ED and DON on the policies for falls, accident investigation to include root cause analysis, care plan development, and care plan revision.
3. On 05/29/2023, the VPCS, a member of the Governing Body, reviewed the removal plans with the ED for F656, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867 to ensure understanding of the requirements of each plan and ensure adherence to the plan(s) to decrease the risk of potential injuries to residents related to falls.
4. (a). In interview on 06/09/2023 the VPCS and VPCO stated beginning 05/29/2023, a review was completed with the ED by a member of the Governing Body, which included the VPCO, and VPCS. They stated the review was to continue to be completed each week beginning 05/29/2023, for actions with follow up including audits and plans which had been initiated to correct identified concerns.
(b). In continued interview on 06/09/2023 the VPCS and VPCO stated the process also included follow-up with staff members, department heads, the external consultant, residents and/or families to assist with evaluating ongoing compliance or deficient practices regarding the removal plan and/or the facility's processes related to the regulatory intent of F656, F657, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867.
The VPCS and VPCO stated any concerns identified regarding the review with the ED were to be immediately addressed/corrected by the ED and discussed with another member of the Governing Body (VPCS or VPCO).
(d). In additional interview on 06/09/2023 the VPCS and VPCO stated immediate actions were taken to ensure residents' well-being and compliance with the identified regulatory violations. They stated the findings were to be reported to the COO starting on 05/29/2023 by the VPO or VPCO weekly.
In an interview on 06/10/2023 the facility's COO, VPCO and SVPCS stated the ED and DON received education on the facility's past three (3) year's survey history, the facility's policies for falls, and accident investigation to include root cause analysis utilizing the Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services (CMS) five (5) Whys. They further stated the education included Care Plan development, Care Plan revision, the roles and expectations of: administration of the facility; the Governing Body; the Medical Director; and the QAPI Committee.
5. In an interview on 06/10/2023 the COO stated beginning 05/29/2023, his role included completing the education with the members of the Governing Body regarding their roles and responsibilities to provide oversight to the management and operation of the facility to ensure it was administered effectively, and to ensure the facility had an effective QAPI program.
6. (a). In interview on 06/10/2023 with the ED and DON they stated they both received education on 05/29/2023, provided by the VPCS on the roles and expectations of administration of the facility, the Governing Body, the Medical Director; and the QAPI Committee.
(b). In interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, the VPCS stated she had re-educated the ED, DON, and Medical Director on the revised Accidents and Incidents/Falls, Investigating and Reporting policies which included notification of the Administrator (ED) and DON.
In continued interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, the VPCS stated she re-educated the ED, DON, and SDC on 05/19/2023, on the facility's fall policy, and ensuring completion of fall risk assessments on admission, quarterly, and with significant change in the resident's condition. She stated the re-education also included ensuring care plan interventions were implemented based on findings of the fall risk assessment, implementing an immediate intervention following each fall including a root cause analysis, and discussion by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to review/update the resident's care plan following each fall for further interventions that included the need for increased supervision or assistive devices as deemed necessary.
In interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, the VPCS stated the facility's QAPI met daily specifically for falls, to look at all falls, for prevention, root cause identification, behaviors and risk prone residents and interventions. She stated this was to be included on weekends and holidays, and the Medical Director was to be notified to keep him updated. The VPCS stated the communication had been enhanced, firsthand and had increased her awareness regarding the importance of frequent communication and having a continued onsite presence.
(c). Review of the facility's documentation and staff educational personnel files revealed on 05/29/2023, a post test was administered to the ED and DON by the VPCS to validate their understanding of the above education.
7. (a). Review of the facility's documentation and meeting minutes revealed beginning 05/23/2023, an Ad hoc QAPI meeting was held with the Medical Director regarding the plan for consistent reviews by the Governing Body to ensure the removal plans were followed and to discuss the weekly review with the ED. Further review revealed no additional recommendations were made by the Medical Director regarding the plan.
Review of the QAPI meeting minutes revealed the ED, DON, VPCS, Infection Preventionist (IP), SSD, Licensed Nurse, and Medical Director met on 05/29/2023 to discuss the facility's plan to ensure care plan interventions were implemented and continue to be in place for residents to decrease the risk of falls/injuries. Further review revealed findings of audits and corrective actions were discussed, with no further recommendations made by the Medical Director at that time.
(b). Review of the facility's documentation and meeting minutes revealed a stand down QAPI meeting was held daily by the ED to review the plan, discuss findings of the audits, and determine concerns which might require immediate action.
Review of the facility's documents and meeting minutes revealed the follow-up with staff members, department heads, external consultant, residents and/or families to assist in evaluating ongoing compliance or deficient practices with the removal plan and/or the facility's processes regarding the regulatory intent of F656, F657, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867.
Review of the facility's documentation revealed beginning 05/29/2023, a review was completed with the ED by a member of the Governing Body to include the VPCO, and VPCS each week beginning 05/29/2023, for actions with follow up to include audits and plans which had been initiated to correct identified concerns.
8. Review of the facility's documentation revealed starting 05/29/2023, a QAPI meeting was to be held daily for two (2) weeks, then weekly times four (4) weeks, then monthly thereafter to ensure continued compliance with the above stated plan to ensure continued compliance with follow-up and recommendations by the governing body.
In interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, the VPCS stated the QAPI had been meeting daily specifically regarding falls, looking at prevention, root cause identification, resident behaviors and risk prone residents and interventions. The VPCS stated the Medical Director was to be notified and be kept updated. She further stated communication had been enhanced, which had increased her awareness of the importance of frequent communication and having a remaining onsite presence.
In interview on 06/10/2023, the COO, VPCO and Senior [NAME] President of Clinical Services (SVPCS) stated education had been provided to the ED and DON as alleged specific to their roles and responsibilities to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident.
9. (a). Review of the facility's documentation, and staff educational training sheets revealed on 05/30/2023, the ED provided education to the Department Managers which included the DON, ADON, SDC, UM, MDS Coordinator, SSD, SSC, BOM, AD, DD, RSD, HKS, and MA regarding the roles and responsibilities of the facility's Governing Body.
In interview on 06/09/2023 at 4:00 PM, the SSD stated daily QAPI meetings occurred with the ED and VPCS to go over falls, Governing Body, and care plans. She stated she received multiple educations on falls/incidents/air mattress/PIP, and QAPI. The SSD stated she felt the education had been beneficial, and the QAPI and PIP were not well known to staff; however, now much more communication was occurring and more participation with the PIP. The SSD stated staff were educated on the residents' care plans and how to correct it if something was incorrect, and to perform visual rounds. She further stated all departments had been educated which included ensuring family notifications, care plan editing, medication reviews, psychiatric involvement and appointments.
(b). Review of the staff educational training sheets revealed the education included the availability of the Governing Body for concerns, grievances, or the need of resources to assist in ensuring the highest level of care and services to the residents in the facility.
In interview on 06/09/2023 at 3:05 PM, the SDC stated the team identified the facility's failure regarding the citations were related to the the importance of air mattress education needed to be provided, importance of one-on-one (1:1) supervision and other increased supervision of residents at high risk for falls, care plans needing to be updated and followed up on by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). The SDC stated the importance of proper care of residents, specific to the facility's systems failure was to ensure residents were toileted, repositioned, their pain addressed and personal items were in reach. She stated to ensure necessary follow through: more education of staff was needed to make them more observant; investigation of the root cause of incidents was needed; and ensuring appropriate fall interventions were in place and implementing them. The SDC stated the facility initiated increased QAPI education with staff, education with all departments and explained the QAPI process. According to the SDC, the IDT was now to evaluate to reduce residents' falls, other accidents/falls and provide a better quality of care, and staff were to be involved and have input with the PIP. She stated there had been a team meeting specific to falls and actual floor staff involvement/input to work more cohesively and improve resident safety. The SDC stated her involvement with the removal plan included education per the VPCS on all the implementations to improve resident quality of care and ensure their safety. She stated she performed all trainings of the QAPI, Fall/Accidents, low air loss mattress with required two (2) assistants, settings and checking a resident's coccyx, and ongoing education of abuse. The SDC stated she ensured all staff were educated one-on-one (1:1) in person, and/or via phone to perform competency testing. She further stated all current agency staff were educated, and new onboarding staff, had an introduction orientation packet that must be performed prior to working the floor with testing required.
10. (a). Review of the facility's documentation, review of the educational training sign-in sheets revealed on 05/30/2023, education had been initiated with staff by the SDC, DON, ADON, Nursing Supervisor or VPCS regarding the roles and responsibilities of the Governing Body.
(b). Review of the facility's educational documentation revealed the education included the availability of the Governing Body for concerns, grievances, or need of resources to assist in ensuring the highest level of care and services to the residents in the facility.
In interview on 06/10/2023 the COO, VPCO and SVPCS stated the ED and DON received education on the facility's past three (3) year's survey history, the facility's policies for falls, accident investigation to include root cause analysis utilizing the CMS five (5) Whys, Care Plan development, Care Plan revision, and the roles and expectations of: the administration of the facility; the Governing Body (RGB); the Medical Director (MD); and the QAPI Committee.
In interview on 06/09/2023 at 4:00 PM, the SSD stated daily QAPI meetings with the ED and VPCS had been held to go over residents' falls, Governing Body, and care plans. She stated she received multiple educations on falls, incidents, air mattresses, PIP, and QAPI. According to the SSD, she felt it had been beneficial, as the QAPI and PIP had not been well known to staff, and now there was more communication and participation in the PIP. The SSD stated all departments were educated on the required items including ensuring family notification, care plans, editing care plans, medication reviews, psychiatric involvement, appointments, and fixing something if it was incorrect.
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0841
(Tag F0841)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to investigate ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to investigate the root cause of the resident's falls. The Medical Director was responsible for providing the staff direction related to the facility's policy and the current professional standard of practice and failed to ensure the coordination of medical care in the facility. As a result, five (5) of forty-seven (47) sampled residents experienced falls with major injuries.
The facility's failure to have an effective system to ensure the Medical Director provided oversight of the residents medical care and failure to implement polices that was reflective of the current professional standards of practice has caused or is likely to cause serious harm or serious injury to the residents.
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] and was determined to exist on [DATE] in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan (F656), Develop/Implement Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plans, at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care (F689), Accidents and Supervision at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR §483.70 Administration (F835, F837, and F841), at a S/S of a K; and 42 CFR §483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, at a S/S of a K. Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) was identified at 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care (F689), Accidents and Supervision. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE].
The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on [DATE], with the facility alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE]. The State Survey Agency (SSA) validated removal of the Immediate Jeopardy, as alleged on [DATE], prior to exit on [DATE]. The scope and severity (S/S) of the IJ deficiencies was lowered to an E while the facility develops and implements a Plan of Correction and the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) monitors to ensure compliance with systemic changes.
(Refer to F656, F689, F835, F837, and F867)
The findings include:
Review of the Medical Director's responsibilities, dated [DATE], revealed the Medical Director was responsible for administrative decisions including recommending, developing, and approving facility policies related to residents' care, providing medical and clinical leadership in a multidisciplinary approach to resident care and care planning within the skilled long-term setting. Further review of the Medical Director's responsibilities revealed he was to assist the facility with the identification, evaluation, and resolution or medical and clinical concerns affecting resident care or quality of life.
Review of the facility policy titled Fall Management, dated [DATE], revealed a fall was an unintentional change in position coming to rest on the ground, floor or onto the next lower surface, which included onto a bed, chair, or bedside mat. The policy stated injury related to a fall was any documented injury that occurred as a result of or was recognized within a short period of time (hours or to a few days) after the fall and attributed to the fall. According to the policy, a major injury included bone fractures, joint dislocations, closed head injuries with altered consciousness, and subdural hematomas. Review of the policy also revealed a fall risk observation was completed on admission, quarterly, annually, with any significant change in condition, and with any fall, and was utilized to identify individuals who were at high risk for falls. Further review of the policy revealed fall prevention was achieved through an interdisciplinary approach of managing risk factors and implementing appropriate interventions to reduce risk for falls.
Review of the facility Low Air Loss Mattress owner's manual titled INVACARE Micro AIR MA65 Series dated [DATE], revealed to avoid risk of death or injury from falling: Invacare suggest read and use the User Manual prior to using the product, rails be in the raised position whenever a patient is on the bed, proper patient assessment and monitoring is required to prevent injury, variations in bed rail dimensions, and mattress thickness, size or density could increase the risk of injury, work with therapist, physician and other medical staff to perform assessment and patient monitoring, to avoid death, injury, or damage due to improper maintenance and inspection, always maintain and inspect equipment.
Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program, effective date [DATE], revealed the purpose of QAPI was to ensure the mission of the facility was actualized through the establishment of resident centered quality management processes, to ensure that proactive quality care and services were provided to each resident on a continuous basis, to ensure compliance with regulations and standards of practice and to provide timely solutions to spontaneous events. Further review of the policy revealed objectives of the QAPI program included a systemic process designed to ensure that care practices were consistently applied, and the facility met or exceeded an expected standard of quality.
Review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program review for [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE] report revealed the QA committee failed to review the Plan of Correction (PoC) from the Recertification Survey with exit date of [DATE], in which the facility was cited at an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), related to falls. Further review of the of the QAPI Program revealed there was no documentation to support the committee continued with Quality Measured comments or action plan for improvement. Continued review revealed there was no evidence the committee developed plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies based on the root cause analysis and prioritization of topics of identified issues/concerns related to resident falls with major injury, and failed to maintain formal written documentation as evidence of ongoing quality management to promote and ensure the resident's safety.
1. Review of the facility's Incident Audit Report dated [DATE] at 9:35 PM, for Resident #1 revealed the resident was found on the floor next to his/her bed, with his/her feet towards the head of the bed and his/her head next to the wall. The facility identified the resident fell out of his/her low air lost (LAL) mattress. The resident was noted to have had a knot on his/her left side of his/her scalp. Further review revealed the resident did not know what happened or how he/she ended up on the floor. Continued review of the incident report, revealed the resident's pain level was not assessed, and the predisposing environmental/situational factors were not documented. Review of the Hospital Medical Record, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted with diagnosis of a Nondisplaced Fracture of the second Cervical Vertebrae. Review of the QA minutes revealed no recommendation from the Medical Director, to include the review of the facility's policy or discussion of the standards of practice to assist with interventions to prevent the resident's fall, as per the facility's policy and the Medical Directors Job Responsibilities.
Subsequently, on [DATE], Resident #1 experienced a second fall. Review of the facility's Incident Audit Report, revealed the resident was found lying on the floor next to his/her wheelchair. Continued review revealed the resident was trying to get up and screaming that he/she just wanted to go back to bed. The resident had been in the lounge on the 200 Unit, visiting with his/her sister after lunch. Further, the resident stated, I fell out of my chair, wanna go to bed. Review of the resident's Hospital Medical Record revealed the resident was diagnosed with a nondisplaced fracture of the proximal tibial methaphysis; bilateral tibial fracture, and right distal fibula avulsion fractures. Review of the QA minutes revealed no recommendation from the Medical Director, to include the review of the facility's policy or discussion of the standards of practice to assist with interventions to address the adequate supervision required to assist the resident to his/her bed. As a result, the resident was placed on Hospice Care. The resident expired on [DATE].
2. Review of the facility's Incident Audit Report, dated [DATE] at 8:07 PM, revealed Resident #16's roommate yelled for help. Review of the report revealed the Kentucky Medication Aide (KMA) was walking down the hallway and went into the resident's room. Resident #16 was noted sitting on his/her buttock on the bathroom floor with his/her back against the wall. A continued review of the report revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #1 noted the resident had his/her socks on that was not his/her nonskid socks. The resident stated he/she tripped over his/her oxygen cord. Further review of the report revealed the resident hit his/her head on the wall. He/she further stated his/her oxygen cord pulled causing the resident to trip over it. Review of the immediate action taken revealed an order was received to send the resident to the emergency room (ER). Review of Resident #16's emergency room (ER) Record, dated [DATE], revealed the resident's primary impression/diagnosis was a displaced fracture of his/her shaft of the left clavicle related to an unspecified fall. Review of the QA committee minutes revealed no documentation to support the Medical Director offered recommendations to the facility staff to include a review of the facility's policy related to falls and/or care plan review. The facility failed to address the resident's concern related to the resident's oxygen tubing, which caused the resident's fall.
3. Review of the facility's Incident Audit Report dated [DATE] at 12:49 AM, revealed Resident #17 was found lying on the floor, on his/her back beside his/her bed. Further review, revealed the resident rolled out of the bed, hitting his/her face on the floor, with lacerations and a hematoma to his/her forehead. Continued review revealed confusion and impaired memory were noted as predisposing physiological factors with no evidence of other predisposing environmental, nor situational factors, and/or documented interviews to demonstrate a thorough investigation. A continued review of the incident report revealed the immediate action taken was to assist the resident to bed, apply pressure to the resident's wound, and the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) for an evaluation. The Medical Director; however, failed to provide recommendation to the facility to include: reviewing the facility's policy related to falls, to assist with determining the root cause of the resident's fall, through an investigation, and failed to gather information from the investigation to develop an intervention that would be person-centered specific. Continued review of the incident report revealed the resident was sent to the hospital were it was documented the resident had facial laceration from his/her fall.
4. Review of the facility's Incident Audit Report dated [DATE], revealed Resident #18 was found on the floor at the foot of both beds in his/her room. Continued review of the incident report revealed that when staff asked the resident, What he/she was trying to do? The resident stated, pee. Further review of the incident report revealed that numerous episodes of urinary incontinence was noted in the resident's brief. The incident report revealed the resident only verbalized pee numerous times. Further review of the incident report revealed the resident attempted to transfer self to the bathroom. The incident report revealed there were no predisposing factor for the resident's environment, and the resident's psychological factors included confusion, weakness, and gait imbalance.
Further review of the facility incident report revealed on [DATE], the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) reviewed the resident's fall and concluded the root cause analysis identified and documented as, resident with urgency to urinate, with the intervention provided to be incontinence care, and keep urinal in reach. The Medical Director; however, failed to provide recommendation to the facility to include: reviewing the facility's policies related to falls and care plans. Review of the resident's care plan revealed staff were to check on the resident every two (2) to three (3) hour to assist with transferring the resident to the bathroom and commode. Staff documented the resident had numerous episodes of urinary incontinence and the resident stated he/she had to pee; however, the Medical Director failed to offer a recommendation to the facility staff, to include increased supervision with transferring the resident to the bathroom, to prevent additional falls.
Additionally, Resident #18 had a second (2nd) fall on [DATE]. Review of the facility's Incident Audit Report, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #18 was noted to be lying on his/her stomach on the floor beside his/her bed. The resident stated, 'I fell out of bed. Resident #18 was sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation and was found to have a nasal/septum fracture and fracture of the anterior maxillary process. Further review of the facility incident report revealed the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) reviewed and concluded the root cause analysis was identified and documented as, the resident lies on his/her side in his/her bed when resting. However, there was no documentation to support the Medical Director provided a resolution, identification, or an evaluation to assist the facility staff developed appropriate interventions to prevent or reduce the resident's falls. Further review of the resident's Medical Record revealed the resident reported to the emergency room (ER) staff, on [DATE], that the facility removed the resident's bed railings from his/her bed, which caused the resident's fall. Additional review of the resident's record revealed the resident was not assessed or evaluated for bedrails, prior to his/her fall on [DATE]. Continued review of the resident's medical record revealed the Medical Director failed to address in the QA committee meeting the concern of the bedrails noted in the resident's hospital records.
5. Review of the facility's Incident Audit Form dated [DATE], revealed Resident #19 rolled from his/her bed on to the floor during incontinence care. Review of the witness statement revealed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7 said she rolled the resident away from her and the resident rolled out of bed. Continued review of the incident form revealed incontinent was noted to be the only predisposing physiological factors listed on the form. IDT determined the root cause of the fall was determined to be the air mattress and the resident rolled on the opposite of staff. Review of the resident's care plan revealed the resident was assessed to have two (2) person assist with bed mobility; however the CNA who performed the resident's care worked independently. The IDT did not address this concern as part of the root cause nor was there documentation to support the Medical Director offered the facility staff a recommendation.
On [DATE], IDT reviewed the incident report and determined the root cause analysis was determined and documented as the resident was on an air mattress and the resident rolled opposite staff. Further review revealed the intervention was to change the air mattress to contour mattress, and side rails were placed to use during care. However, the facility failed to determine within the root cause analysis that the resident was assessed to have two (2) staff to assist with his/her bed mobility.
Review of Resident #19's Hospital Record, dated [DATE] at 9:52 AM, revealed the resident had a fall with laceration/hematoma. Continued review of the hospital record revealed the {resident} patient fell from bed without loss of consciousness. Further review revealed the {resident} patient had a 4 to 5-centimeter (cm) skin tear to his/her right jawline with no bleeding noted. The hospital record also revealed the resident had a moderate size blue hematoma with swelling to his/her right lateral elbow area and a smaller blue hematoma to his/her forearm. Further review of the hospital record revealed nasal bone fracture with a 9 cm facial laceration and contusion of the head and right forearm.
In addition, review of the fall tracker revealed the facility had a total of one-hundred and eight (108) falls within a four (4) month time period, [DATE] thorough [DATE]. Of the 108 falls, thirty-three (33) falls resulted in injuries
In an interview, on [DATE] at 4:45 PM, with the Minimum Data Set (MDSC) Coordinator, she stated she had been in the MDS role for one (1) year and was actively involved in the daily clinical meetings. Per the interview, she stated the IDT would discuss the recent falls and review the interventions in place and determine any new, needed interventions; however, she was not aware who was ultimately responsible to ensure the interventions were being implemented. Further, she stated she did not recall any interventions with Resident #1 being discussed or implemented. She added, previously she would just care plan the type of mattress, not include guidelines of weights and/or specifics. Continued interview with MDSC revealed if the resident's air mattress settings were not based on current weight and not accurate, it could cause a danger to the resident with a potentially dangerous outcome. She stated the bed rails would also now be care planned and the unit managers would be responsible for the bedrail assessments. The MDS Coordinator stated she often communicated with the Therapy Director (TD) to discuss changes to the resident's care plan, related to falls.
Interview on [DATE] at 10:22 AM with the Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP), stated she was in house daily for more acute visits, and the Medical Director (MD) would see the more chronic residents two (2) times a month; however, stated the MD would begin seeing the resident's more often. The ARNP stated, typically, if a fall/incident occurred, she would assess the resident and implement orders immediately. She stated all staff should be familiar with the residents' plan of care and interventions for the safety and appropriateness of care for the resident.
In an interview on [DATE] at 9:44 AM with the Executive Director (ED), she stated she had been in the role since [DATE] and was responsible for the day-to-day functioning of the facility and was responsible to ensure the facility operated within the state and federal guidelines and maintained regulatory compliance regarding previously cited deficiencies. She stated she was the Quality Assurance Coordinator and was responsible for the program. In addition, she stated she was required to ensure the ongoing audits related to previously cited deficiencies were reviewed, and if any concerns were identified, they were corrected immediately. The ED stated the facility had put audits in place; however, the facility was focused on the tracking and trending of previous falls specific to the facility percentages and numbers, and was not resident specific.
In an additional interview, on [DATE] at 2:45 PM with the Executive Director on [DATE] at 2:45 PM, she stated the Medical Director communicates with staff when he made his rounds; however, there was no formal education/training specific to falls with staff.
In an interview, on [DATE] at 2:30 PM, the Medical Director (MD), stated his role as the Medical Director was to coordinate care and if issues were discovered, he would communicate with the facility Executive Director (ED). Further interview revealed he would expect staff to follow the residents plan of care and implement the interventions as ordered. Per the interview, the MD stated the facility had a high turnover rate and it was difficult to build a system with inconsistent staffing. He further stated the inconsistent staffing contributed to the increase in the residents falls as the staff were unfamiliar with the resident and their behaviors. The MD further stated he was involved with the QA process; however, the facility focused more on percentage of falls the residents had and were not focus on the specific resident.
The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on [DATE], alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE]. Review of the Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan revealed the facility implemented the following:
1.a.) Beginning on [DATE], the Executive Director (ED) reviewed the responsibilities of the Medical Director (MD) with him. The Medical Director's responsible included: administrative decisions, recommending, developing, and approving the facility's policies related to the residents' care; and providing medical and clinical leadership in a multidisciplinary approach to resident care planning within the skilled long-term care facility.
b.) The falls policy was reviewed, revised and approved on [DATE].
2. a.) On [DATE], the Executive Director reviewed the removal plans with the Medical Director for F656, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867 to ensure understanding of the requirements of each plan and to request recommendations for further interventions to decrease the risk of potential injuries to residents related to falls/injuries in the facility.
b.) The Medical Director stated he understood the plans and made no recommendations.
3. On [DATE], the Executive Director (ED) reviewed the education provided to the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) provided by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) on [DATE], regarding the facility's fall policy.
a.) To include ensuring completion of fall risk assessments on admission, quarterly, and with a change in a resident's condition, ensuring that care plan interventions were implemented based on findings of the fall risk assessment, implementing an immediate intervention following each fall, completion of a thorough investigation following each fall, including a root cause analysis.
b.) Discussion by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to review/update the resident's care plan following each fall for further interventions to include the need for increased supervision or assistive devices as deemed necessary.
c.) The Medical Director made no further recommendations regarding this education.
4. a.) On [DATE], the Executive Director informed the Medical Director that on [DATE], the SDC started re-educating all current Licensed Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on the facility's fall policy, including but not limited to initiating an investigation as to the cause of the fall, implementing immediate interventions with consideration of the need for increased supervision or the addition of assistive devices, and reviewing/updating the care plan with each fall.
b.) Education also included that low air loss mattresses settings would be compatible with resident's weight, comfort and appropriate functioning of the mattress.
c.) Documentation was added to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for verification of low air mattress settings every shift to ensure that it remained at the appropriate level for each resident.
d.) Staff were educated that residents who required an air loss mattress would require two (2) staff members to assist with turning and repositioning in bed to decrease the risk of falls, and to notify the nurse manager if changes were needed regarding the support surface.
e.) The Nurse Manager would utilize the support surface algorithm from New Source Medical.
f.) Newly hired staff, agency staff and staff who had not been educated would receive this prior to working their next shift.
g.) The Medical Director made no further recommendations regarding the education of staff members.
5. a.) On [DATE], the Executive Director discussed with the Medical Director that beginning [DATE], the Licensed Nurse would initiate and investigate all falls, implement an immediate intervention and update the care plan.
b.) The Clinical Interdisciplinary Team would review residents who had experienced a fall during the morning clinical meeting to ensure a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was determined, all appropriate interventions to include consideration of the need for increased supervision and/or assistive devices as deemed appropriate were implemented to assist in preventing further falls, review and update the care plan as appropriate, and ensure the intervention was on the Care Plan/CNA Kardex.
c.) The DON/ADON/SDC/UM would make an IDT Nurses' Note with the root cause of the fall and intervention that was in place, add any further interventions recommended by IDT. If further recommendations were suggested, the Licensed Nurse would add to the care plan.
6. On [DATE], the Executive Director (ED) informed the Medical Director (MD) that a stand down QAPI meeting would be held daily by the ED to review the above stated, to discuss findings of audits, and determine concerns that may require immediate action. Any adverse findings would be shared with the Medical Director by the Executive Director or Director of Nursing daily for recommendations.
7. a.) On [DATE], an Ad hoc Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) meeting was held by the Executive Director, the Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Licensed Nurse, and with the Medical Director to discuss the plan initiated to decrease the risk of falls.
b.) The method of ensuring that a root cause analysis was completed as part of the investigation following a fall, that consideration was given to the need for increased supervision to decrease the risk of further falls/injuries, that consideration was discussed regarding the need for a change in the resident's environment, the potential need for assistive devices, education provided to staff, and audits for monitoring compliance with fall interventions.
c.) No further recommendations were made by the medical director related to this plan.
8. On [DATE], an Ad hoc QAPI meeting would be held daily times two (2) weeks, then weekly for four (4) weeks to discuss the plan, review findings of the above stated audits, and to request the need for further actions and/or modifications to the plan.
The State Survey Agency (SSA) verified the facility implemented the following corrective actions with the removal of the Immediate Jeopardy by [DATE]:
1.a.) Facility documentation review and interview with the Executive Director (ED), she stated on [DATE] she went over the responsibilities of the Medical Director (MD) with the Medical Director to include the responsibility for administrative decisions.
b.) Facility documentation revealed on [DATE], the falls policy was reviewed, revised and approved on [DATE], by the Medical Director.
2. a.) Facility documentation and during interview with the Executive Director (ED), on [DATE], she stated on [DATE], she reviewed the removal plans with the Medical Director for F656, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867 to ensure understanding of the requirements of each plan and to request recommendations for further interventions to decrease the risk of potential injuries to residents related to falls/injuries in the facility.
b.) Facility documentation revealed the Medical Director stated understanding of the plans and made no recommendations.
2. Facility documentation and during interviews on [DATE] and [DATE],the ED stated on [DATE], that she had reviewed the education provided to the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) provided by the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS) on [DATE], regarding the facility's fall policy.
a.) The education included: ensuring completion of fall risk assessments on admission, quarterly, and with a change in a resident's condition, ensuring that care plan interventions were implemented based on findings of the fall risk assessment, implementing an immediate intervention following each fall, completion of a thorough investigation following each fall, including a root cause analysis.
b.) Discussion by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) included to review/update the resident's care plan following each fall for further interventions that may require the need for increased supervision or assistive devices as deemed necessary.
c.) The Medical Director made no further recommendations regarding this education.
During interview on [DATE] at 3:05 PM, with the SDC, she stated she had been re-educated on the Care Plan policy per the VPCS. She stated she explained the importance of care plan interventions to decrease the risk of residents' falls.
During interview on [DATE] at 1:40 PM, with the VPCS, she stated on [DATE], she re-educated the Executive Director (ED), the Director of Nursing (DON) and the staff Development Coordinator (SDC) on the facility's fall policy, to ensure completion of fall risk assessments on admission, quarterly, and with significant change in the resident's condition, ensuring that care plans interventions were implemented based on findings of the fall risk assessment, implementing an immediate intervention following each fall including a root cause analysis, and discussion by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to review/update the resident's care plan following each fall for further interventions.
3. On [DATE], the VPCS, SDC and the DON stated re-education was provided per the VPCS on [DATE]. During interviews on [DATE] thru [DATE], related to the facility's fall policy, the VPCS, SDC and the DON stated education began [DATE] and consisted of the importance to ensure completion of fall risk assessments on admission, quarterly, and with significant change in the resident's condition were completed. They also stated that the reeducation included to ensure that care plan interventions were implemented based on the findings of the fall risk assessment, implementing an immediate intervention following each fall including a root cause analysis, and discussion by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to review/update the resident's care plan following each fall for further interventions to include the need for increased supervision or assistive devices as deemed necessary.
4. a.) Facility documentation and review of staffs' personnel records specific to education and sign-in sheets revealed on [DATE], the Executive Director informed the Medical Director that on [DATE], the SDC started re-educating all current Licensed Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on the facility's fall policy, including but not limited to initiating an investigation as to the cause of the fall, implementing an immediate intervention with consideration of the need for increased supervision or the addition of assistive devices, and reviewing/updating the care plan with each fall.
b.) Education also included that low air loss mattresses settings would be compatible with the resident's weight, comfort and appropriate functioning of the mattress.
c.) Documentation was added to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for verification of low air mattress settings every shift to ensure that it remains at the appropriate level for each resident.
d.) Staff were educated that residents who required an air loss mattress would require two (2) staff members to assist with turning and repositioning in bed to decrease the risk of falls, and to notify the nurse manager if changes were needed regarding the support surface.
e.) The Nurse Manager would utilize the support surface algorithm from New Source Medic[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policies, documents, Executive Director's Job Description, and Plan of Correction (PoC) submitted for the 03/05/2020 Recertification Survey,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's policies, documents, Executive Director's Job Description, and Plan of Correction (PoC) submitted for the 03/05/2020 Recertification Survey, it was determined the facility failed to have an effective process in place to address systemic failures through regularly scheduled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process.
As a result, the facility failed to ensure standards for quality of care regarding performance improvement measures were achieved and sustained. The facility failed to develop and implement plans of action to correct identified quality of care deficiencies; and failed to ensure standards for quality of care regarding performance improvement measures were achieved and sustained. The facility failed to effectively track adverse resident events, analyze their causes, and implement effective preventive action. The facility failed to ensure there was an effective system in place to regularly review and analyze audit data, including data collected under the QAPI program, and act on available data to make improvements and maintain substantial compliance.
In addition, review of the facility's documentation revealed fall tracker information noting the facility had a total of one-hundred and eight (108) falls within a four (4) month timeframe, 01/01/2023 through 04/30/2023, of which thirty-three (33) of those fall resulted in injuries. However, there was no documented evidence the facility discussed the one-hundred and eight (108) falls, nor reviewed the resident's previous falls, analyzed the time of day and staff patterns for each fall in order to determine the root cause of the falls and to implement person centered interventions to prevent further falls.
Interview and record review revealed the facility had no system in place to thoroughly investigate the root cause of residents' falls. Additionally, there was no documented evidence to support the facility's QAPI analyzed the data collected to decrease the occurrence of residents' falls. The continued failure of the facility to utilized the data collected resulted in a lack of action to correct the systemic, high-risk issue of residents' falls.
The facility's failure to have an effective system in place to address systemic failures through regularly scheduled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process has caused or is likely to cause serious harm or serious injury to the residents.
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 05/26/2023 and was determined to exist on 07/08/2022 in the areas of 42 CFR 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan, Develop/Implement Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plans, (F656) at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, Accidents and Supervision (F689) at a S/S of a K; 42 CFR 483.70 Administration (F835, F837, and F841), at a S/S of a K; and 42 CFR 483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, (F867) at a S/S of a K. Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) was identified at 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, Accidents and Supervision (F689). The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 05/26/2023.
The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on 06/07/2023, with the facility alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/01/2023. The State Survey Agency (SSA) validated removal of the Immediate Jeopardy, as alleged on 06/01/2023, prior to exit on 06/10/2023.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program, effective date of 03/19/2018, revealed the purpose of its QAPI was to ensure the mission of the facility was actualized through the establishment of resident centered quality management processes, and to ensure that proactive quality care and services were provided to each resident on a continuous basis. Continued review revealed the policy's purpose also included allowing access of direct care givers, manager, and customers to quality improvement mechanisms, ensuring compliance with regulations and standards of practice and providing timely solutions to spontaneous events. The policy noted the Executive Director (ED) was to be devoted to continuous quality assurance and improvement. Further review of the policy revealed the objectives of the facility's QAPI program included a systemic process designed to ensure care practices were consistently applied, and the facility met or exceeded an expected standard of quality. In addition, the facility's QAPI program developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies based on root cause analysis and prioritization of topics identified and maintained formal written documentation as evidence of ongoing quality management.
Review of the Executive Director's Job Description, undated, revealed the ED directed and performed quality assessment and assurance functions, including but not limited to: regulatory compliance rounds to monitor performance and to continuously improve quality. According to the job description, implementation of programs to gather and analyze data for trends and to institute actions to resolve problems promptly was a duty of the ED. In addition, per the job description, the ED was to ensure proper documentation was maintained, including but not limited to, meetings and QAPI improvement plans.
Review of the facility's acceptable Plan of Correction (PoC) for the Recertification Survey, dated 03/05/2020, revealed for the substandard deficient practice which had been cited at F689, the facility had educated all licensed staff, the ED, Director of Nursing (DON), the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, and the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) on the Falls Management Policy which included completing the Morse Falls Risk Evaluation (a tool developed for assistance in identifying residents at risk for falling). Continued review of the PoC revealed education was completed for the ED, DON, ADON, and SDC regarding utilizing the Stop and Watch form, a communication form developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Further review revealed the education also encompassed communicating a change in a resident's condition including, but not limited to, pain, concerns related to sleep changes, and/or needing increased help from staff. The education additionally included developing, implementing, and revising care plans to include appropriate interventions based on root cause analysis and review of previous falls to identify trends and assist in determining the most appropriate interventions.
Additional review of the acceptable PoC, for the Recertification Survey dated 03/05/2020, revealed the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) was to review in the facility's daily clinical meeting (Monday through Friday) each fall in the nursing shift report to ensure the falls risk evaluation had been completed for the resident involved. Continued review revealed the IDT was to review the involved resident's recent fall history, to include the five (5) Why's (a tool approved by CMS for identifying root cause analysis), completed by licensed nurses, to assist in determining the appropriate intervention at the time of the fall. Per review of the PoC, beginning on 01/20/2020, the Nursing Consultant, ED, DON, ADON, and Assistant Administrator were to be onsite at the facility to monitor the process related to adequate supervision to prevent accidents/incidents until the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed and substantial compliance had been achieved, and pending QAPI Committee review. PoC review revealed any concerns identified were to be addressed immediately and reported to the QAPI Committee weekly for review and for further recommendations. The PoC stated the QAPI Committee meeting was to be held at least bi-weekly to discuss issues with the Medical Director and also on an as needed basis. In addition, the PoC noted the IDT was to meet daily to discuss the findings and progress; review all falls daily with the Physician to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented. Review further revealed the PoC noted the ED, ADON Assistant Administrator, and DON were to ensure all newly hired staff and agency staff received education on New Hire Orientation or prior to working the floor.
Review of the facility's fall tracker documentation revealed the facility noted a total of one-hundred and eight (108) falls occurred within a four (4) month time period, 01/01/2023 through 04/30/2023. Continued review revealed of the one-hundred and eight (108) falls, thirty-three (33) of the falls resulted in injuries to residents, which included twenty-three (23) residents who sustained repeated falls, and three (3) residents who had sustained fractures from falls.
However, there was no documented evidence the facility's QAPI Committee discussed the one-hundred and eight (108) falls, nor reviewed the resident's previous falls, analyzed the time of day and staff patterns for each fall in order to determine the root cause of the falls and to implement person centered interventions to prevent further falls.
Review of the facility's monthly QAPI Committee meeting minutes, from 02/28/2022 to 04/30/2023, revealed the Committee members noted as present were: the Social Services Director (SSD), the Medical Director (MD) via phone; Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8; MDS Coordinator; Activities Director (AD); ED; Human Resources Director; Director of Nursing (DON); Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN); Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON); and Unit Manager (UM).
Continued review of the QAPI meeting minutes for the dates of 02/28/2022, 03/31/2022, 07/14/2022, and 04/20/2023 revealed no documented evidence the minutes included discussion of residents' falls (with or without injuries), reviewing residents' previous falls, performed a root cause analysis of the falls and/or implemented appropriate person-centered care plan interventions as per the PoC. Review revealed however, on 07/14/2022, the Quality Measures review which included falls indicated the facility's falls for June 2022, was noted as 49.1 %; for May 2022 as 66%; and for April as 70%, with the National average noted as 43.7%, and the State average as 47.3%. Per review, even though there was the Quality Measures review there were no comments, notes and/or an action plan documented, nor review of the PoC regarding the facility's noncompliance related to falls.
Further review of the facility's last year of QAPI notes dated 02/28/2022 through current, 04/20/2023, revealed the facility's QAPI Committed failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies based on root cause analysis and prioritization of topics of identified issues/concerns related to residents' falls with major injury. In addition, the facility's QAPI Committed failed to maintain formal written documentation as evidence of ongoing quality management to promote and ensure resident safety.
During an interview on 05/23/2023 at 1:05 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor stated he had not been involved in the facility's morning IDT meetings and QAPI Committee meetings until this month. He stated his recent attendance was due to the recent need and question of equipment related to residents' accidents and falls. The Maintenance Supervisor stated that week he removed two (2) low air loss (LAL) mattresses from residents' beds due to recent auditing/monitoring of residents. He stated if a resident was mobile, then the resident did not need an air mattress. He further stated he could see the LAL mattresses being a risk factor for causing residents to fall, especially those residents with mental issues.
During an interview on 05/24/2023 at 9:30 AM, the DON stated she had been in her role since March 2023. She stated in the last month or so (no specific date provided), she had been involved with care conferences related to resident falls and incidents, and had observed the environment and updated care plans with resident involvement. The DON stated information on falls was brought to the QAPI meetings and discussed. However, she stated she had not attended recent QAPI meetings. According to the DON, all the data related to residents' falls was to continue to be brought to the monthly QAPI Committee meetings, with the Medical Director's involvement: to discuss residents' history of falls since admission, behaviors and/or any contributing factors to include medications, residents environment and to discuss interventions with the QAPI team. She further stated however, the facility's normal previous routine, had been for the QA process to be done through chart reviews and room checks. In addition, she stated there had previously been no resident specific discussions related to falls.
During an interview on 05/05/2022 at 2:30 PM, the Medical Director stated in his role he coordinated resident care, and if issues were discovered, he communicated with the ED. He stated he expected staff to follow resident's plans of care and implement the interventions as ordered. Per the Medical Director, staff knew what residents' problems were, as well as the resident's patterns; however, unfortunately, staff had not followed through. The Medical Director stated the facility had a high staff turnover rate which caused inconsistent staffing that made it difficult to build a system because the staff members were not trained or educated on the proper care needs of the residents. He stated all of that contributed to the increase in residents' falls. The Medical Director stated he was engaged in the facility's QAPI metrics related to falls, which had been trending upward in numbers.
During an interview on 06/10/2023 at 9:44 AM, the ED stated she had been in her role since July 2022 and was responsible for ensuring the facility operated within state and federal guidelines and maintained regulatory compliance regarding previously cited deficiencies. The ED stated she was also responsible for the facility's day-to-day functioning, and was the Quality Assurance Coordinator and responsible for that program. She stated she was required to ensure the facility's ongoing audits related to previously cited deficiencies were reviewed, and any concerns identified were immediately corrected. The ED stated the facility had implemented audits; however, had focused on tracking and trending previous falls specific to the facility's percentages and numbers, and not onresident specific requirements as to the change with the current PoC. According to the ED, the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) had not been establishing the actual root cause of residents' falls and neglected the overall resident specific picture/part. She stated the collaborative involvement needed, in order to get down to the actual root cause of a resident's fall was missing. Therefore, she stated the falls review which occurred had been missing the most important parts and potentially had placed residents at higher risk of falls and/or injuries. She further stated if all risk factors were not addressed, it did put residents at risk of having a negative outcome which could have been prevented.
During an interview on 06/10/2023 at 10:28 PM, the [NAME] President of Operations (VPO) stated he started working for the corporation on 05/30/2023. He stated he provided in person oversight to the facility's Governing Body which included the ED and [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO), starting on 05/31/2023, and had been involved with the revisions of the facility's PoC on 06/05/2023. The VPO stated his role was to provide general operational oversight of the facility; performing policy review and revision; and ensuring preventive measures for the understanding of standards of care, policies, and their implementation. He stated the difference in the facility's corrections from the 2020 falls PoC compared to the current PoC being developed was related to the education. He stated now the importance and focus was on root cause analysis, looking into the injuries, appropriate risk factors, starting from the admission process, and ensuring proper resident specific preventive measures were in place and sustained. The VPO stated those preventive measures should have already been implemented and a part of the facility's process.
During an interview on 06/09/2023 at 1:40 PM, the [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO), stated she was a member of the facility's Governing Body (GB), which also included the ED and the VPO. The VPCO stated her role was to provide oversight of the ED and facility, guidance for the ED and education regarding policies and procedures. She stated beginning on 05/17/2023, she had been onsite to provide staff support while the State Survey Agency was in the building. The VPCO stated she identified on 05/19/2023, that no orders were in place for air mattresses, and she performed an audit of residents who had an air mattress. She stated the results of that audit resulted in her discontinuing two (2) residents' low air loss (LAL) mattresses. Per the VPCO, throughout that time she communicated with the Senior [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (SVPCO), and the SVPCO had been in agreement with her. She stated she periodically attended QAPI, performed a lot of on the spot training, and researched QAPI tools to provide education of root cause analysis and the facility's trending to increase resident supervision. The VPCO stated the facility's failure related to residents' falls had been that there was no system in place to determine the root cause of the falls, which resulted in neglecting the residents' needs. She stated that investigating the why of the fall happening, in order to promote a thorough investigation. She stated prior to the the deficiencies and auditing of residents' medical records, staff members attempted to identify the root cause of residents' falls. The VPCO stated however, staff had required additional education regarding root cause analysis, and explanation of the process of identifying the appropriate root cause. She stated audits revealed the need for staff education and the importance of a system-wide approach. According to the VPCO, it was determined there needed to be a procedure to improve the interview process, which included pre-fall resident information containing staff interviews/involvement. She stated there needed to be an immediate investigation/action implemented and followed through related to the actual root cause, of falls/incidents to promote an appropriate immediate intervention, such as increased supervision of the involved resident.
The facility provided an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan on 06/07/2023, alleging removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/01/2023. Review of the Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan revealed the facility implemented the following.
1. On 05/23/2023, the facility did not have documentation to support there was an effective QAPI Program to investigate the root cause of falls for Residents #1, #16, #17, #18, and #19.
(a). Resident #1 no longer resided in the facility.
(b). Falls for Residents #16, #17, #18, and #19 were reviewed by the QAPI Committee on 05/23/2023. A root cause analysis (RCA) was performed for each of the resident's falls, and care plan interventions were implemented related to findings of the RCA for each resident.
2. (a). On 05/23/2023, an audit of falls in the facility for the last ninety (90) days was conducted by the ED, DON, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Staff Development Coordinator (SDC), and [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS).
(b). Care plans were reviewed for residents who experienced a fall in the last three (3) months to ensure an appropriate intervention was in place to decrease the risk of falls. Corrective actions were completed as indicated.
3. (a). On 05/29/2023, the ED, DON, and Medical Director, through the QAPI Committee, initiated a performance improvement project (PIP) sub-committee comprised of the DON, ADON, SDC, Unit Manager (UM), Charge Nurse, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Director of Rehabilitation Services, Activity Director (AD), and Housekeeping Supervisor.
(b). The ED charged the PIP sub-committee team with analyzing the falls data, completing a trending of the data, completing a root cause analysis of falls in the facility, interviewing residents and staff regarding fall risk, utilizing feedback and information to develop a plan, and reporting the findings to the QAPI Committee by 05/30/2023. The facility's plan was to decrease the number of falls; and therefore, reduce the risk of injury from falls.
4. (a). On 05/29/2023, education was provided for the ED, DON, and Medical Director by the VPCS, regarding the requirement to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data driven QAPI program that focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life.
(b). Included in the education were the five (5) elements of QAPI and making the process an active part of identifying concerns and initiating PIPs to collect and analyze data, complete root cause analysis, develop a plan, and monitor the effectiveness of the plan.
5. On 05/29/2023, a Stand-down QAPI Committee meeting would be held daily by the ED to review the above, to discuss findings of audits of plans for F656, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867 and determine concerns which might require immediate action. Corrective actions were to be initiated immediately.
6. On 05/29/2023, an Ad Hoc QAPI Committee meeting was held by the ED, DON, Infection Preventionist, Licensed Nurse, and Medical Director to discuss the plans initiated to decrease the risk of falls.
(a). In the meeting they determined a method for ensuring a root cause analysis would be completed as part of the investigation following a fall; that consideration was given to the need for increased supervision to decrease the risk of further falls/injuries; that consideration was discussed regarding the need for a change in the resident's environment; the potential need for assistive devices; education provided to staff; and audits for monitoring compliance with fall interventions.
(b). Discussion with the QAPI Committee included the development of a PIP to decrease the number of injuries related to falls and ensure an effective plan with monitoring was initiated.
7. Starting 05/29/2023, a QAPI Committee meeting was to be held daily times two (2) weeks, then weekly for four (4) weeks, then monthly to ensure continued compliance with the above stated plan to ensure continued compliance with follow-up and recommendations by the Governing Body.
8. Beginning 05/30/2023, education was conducted by the VPCS for the QAPI Committee, which included the DON, ADON, SDC, UM, Dietary Manager (DM), and Social Services Director (SSD) on the QAPI program.
(a). Education included QAPI goals, elements of the QAPI program, facility implementation of the QAPI program, staff's role in the QAPI program, and how to communicate concerns, problems, or opportunities for improvement to the QAPI Committee.
(b). Also discussed was the facility's current PIP, with a goal of reducing falls and injuries related to falls, and the role of staff in the PIP. Staff including agency staff and volunteers not in the facility on 05/31/2023, were to receive education prior to working in the facility.
9. (a). On 05/30/2023, education was initiated by the SDC for facility staff, agency staff, and volunteers on the QAPI program.
(b). Education included QAPI goals, elements of the program, facility implementation of the QAPI program, staff's role in the QAPI program, and how to communicate concerns, problems, or opportunities for improvement to the QAPI Committee.
(c). Also discussed was the facility's current Performance Improvement Project (PIP), with a goal of reducing falls and injuries related to falls, and the role of staff in the PIP. Staff including agency staff and volunteers not in the facility on 05/31/2023 would receive education prior to working in the facility.
The State Survey Agency (SSA) verified the facility implemented the following corrective actions with the removal of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/01/2023 prior to exit on 06/10/2023.
1. Review of the facility's documentation confirmed the facility's conclusion its QAPI had not been effective in investigating the root cause of Residents #1, #16, #17, #18, and #19's falls.
(a). Review of Resident #1's closed record review confirmed the resident no longer resided in the facility.
(b). Review of Residents #16's, #17's, #18's, and #19's records and review of the facility's QAPI Committee minutes dated 05/23/2023, confirmed the QAPI Committee performed a root cause analysis (RCA) of the residents' falls, and implemented care plan interventions related to the findings of the RCA for each resident.
2. (a). Review of the facility's falls audit documentation and tracking/trending report confirmed on 05/23/2023, the audit of falls was conducted for the past ninety (90) days by the ED, DON, ADON, SDC, and the VPCS.
(b). The records of residents noted as having experienced a fall in the past ninety (90) days were reviewed, including their care plans and Kardex and corrective actions alleged were confirmed.
In an interview on 06/09/2023 at 4:00 PM, the SSD stated she audited fall care plans last week. She stated she went through the care plans with an IDT note to audit the resident's fall risk and develop appropriate interventions as a team with the ED, Supervisors, Unit Managers, ADON, and DON. The SSD further stated the IDT identified and updated residents' fall risks and ensured appropriate interventions were developed for each fall risk resident's care plan.
In an interview on 06/09/2023 at 3:05 PM, the SDC stated the IDT realized the facility's failures with the citations, which revealed the importance of air mattress education that needed to be provided for staff. The SDC stated the IDT also realized the importance of the need for increased supervision for residents at high risk for falls, including one-to-one (1:1) supervision, and the importance of updating care plans and the IDT following-up on care plans. She stated a system failure had been identified by the IDT specific to the importance of proper care for the residents. The SDC stated proper care for residents included ensuring residents were toileted timely, were repositioned as necessary, had their pain addressed, and had their personal items within reach. She stated staff members must ensure follow through with such actions, and have more education: on being observant, investigating the root cause of falls, updating the care plan with appropriate fall interventions, and implementing those interventions. Per the SDC, the facility's QAPI initiated actions were to increase QAPI education with staff and explain the QAPI process. She stated the IDT was now evaluating falls indepth to reduce the falls and providing a better quality of care to residents. The SDC stated staff were having input in the QAPI Performance Improvement Project (PIP) on falls initiated on 05/30/2023 and team meetings were being held, specific to falls, with floor staff involvement and input for staff to work more cohesively and improve resident safety.
3. (a). Review of the facility's QAPI Committee documentation revealed a meeting was held on 05/29/2023, in which the ED, DON, and MD, initiated a PIP sub-committee comprised of the DON, ADON, SDC, Unit Manager, Charge Nurse, CNA, Director of Rehabilitation Services, Activity Director, and Housekeeping Supervisor.
(b). Continued review of the facility's QAPI Committee documentation revealed the ED charged the PIP sub-committee team with analyzing falls data, completing a trending of the data, and completing root cause analysis of falls. Review additionally revealed the ED also charged the PIP sub-committee with interviewing residents and staff regarding fall risk, utilizing the feedback and information to develop a plan, and reporting the plan to the QAPI Committee by 05/30/2023. Review further revealed the plan initiated on 05/30/2023, was to decrease the number of falls, and therefore the risk of residents' injury from falls.
In interview on 06/09/2023 at 4:00 PM, the SSD stated the staff education on the QAPI process regarding the PIP was more beneficial now, as previously the QAPI and the PIP had not been very well known by staff. However, she stated now from the QAPI meetings and discussion of the PIP process to decrease the number of falls/injuries had promoted increased staff communication and participation with the PIP.
4. In an interview on 06/10/2023 at 9:33 AM, with the DON and at 9:40 AM, with the ED, they stated on 05/29/2023, they were provided education by the VPCS, and the Medical Director was also present for the education. They stated the education was regarding the requirement for developing, implementing, and maintaining an effective, comprehensive, and data driven QAPI program for the facility that focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for residents. The ED stated the education also included identifying concerns, the five (5) elements of QAPI, initiating PIPs to collect and analyze data, completing root cause analysis, developing a plan, and monitoring the effectiveness of the plan.
In an interview on 06/10/2023 at 1:40 PM with the facility's Corporate Operations Officer (COO), [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) the COO stated education had been provided to the ED and DON specific to their roles and responsibilities to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident.
5. Review of the facility's QAPI Committee documentation revealed a Stand-down QAPI meeting was held daily beginning on 05/29/2023. Review of the minutes for the 05/29/2023 Stand-down QAPI meeting held at 3:00 PM, revealed the meeting was held to discuss the plans for the deficiencies identified at F656, F689, F835, F837, F841, and F867. Further review of the facility's QAPI Committee documentation revealed Stand-down QAPI meeting were held daily as alleged.
In interview on 06/10/2023 at 9:44 AM, the ED stated on 05/29/2023, a Stand-down QAPI meeting was held and continued to be held daily in order to complete a comprehensive review of the plan of correction to include action taken for in-house cited resident(s); review of actions taken for residents not cited; and education plan and audit tools and schedule for completion. The ED stated a root cause analysis, Comprehensive Care Plan review for falls and IDT review of current and newly developed interventions occurred. He stated consultation with Therapy Services and/or Medical Director, and/or family/responsible party for cited residents as well as other residents at risk for falls was conducted as a portion of the review. Per the ED, facility staff were interviewed to elicit feedback on the care and services of the cited residents as well as encouraged to bring concerns to the QAPI Committee as it related to falls.
6. Review of the QAPI Committee minutes from the 05/29/2023 meeting revealed an Ad Hoc meeting was held to discuss the plans initiated to decrease the risk of falls. In attendance was the ED, DON, Infection Preventionist, Licensed Nurse, and the Medical Director.
(a). Continued review of the 05/29/2023 Ad Hoc QAPI Committee minutes revealed the method determined to reduce falls was to ensure a root cause analysis (RCA) was completed as part of the investigation following a resident's fall, and for consideration to be given to the need for increased supervision of residents to decrease the risk of further falls/injuries. Review of the minutes further revealed it was additionally determined consideration was discussed regarding the need for a change in environm[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's incident report form, and review of the facility's policy, it was de...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's incident report form, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from misappropriation of property for one (1) of forty-seven (47) sampled residents (Resident #90). Resident #90 had a lock box with four hundred dollars ($400) that could not be located.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy, Freedom from Abuse and Neglect, not dated, revealed the purpose of the policy was to protect and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of property. The policy defined misappropriation as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent.
Review of Resident #90's electronic health record (EHR) revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 01/14/2022, with diagnoses that included Other Acute Osteomyelitis Unspecified Site, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Unspecified (COPD), and Malignant Neoplasm of Upper Lobe Right Bronchus or Lung.
Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed Resident #90 to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven (11) of fifteen (15), which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Review of a Significant Change MDS Assessment, dated 09/22/2022, revealed the facility assessed Resident #90 to have a fourteen (14) of fifteen (15) score on the BIMS' assessment, which indicated no cognitive impairment
Review of an Activities care plan revealed the facility provided Resident #90 a lock box on 02/02/2022.
Review of Resident #90's Long Term Care Facility-Self-Reported Incident Form and attached investigation, dated 10/14/2022, revealed Resident #90 reported to staff that his/her lock box was missing. Further review revealed Resident #90 stated that he/she had last observed in it in the top of his/her closet, around the middle of August 2022, when he/she ordered pizza. Record review revealed Resident #90 reported that he/she had approximately four hundred dollars ($400) missing. Continued review of the facility's investigation revealed interviews, with staff as well as family members who had visited the resident since mid-August. The facility's investigation could not determine the location of the missing lock box and could not rule out misappropriation, although staff members were unable to identify a perpetrator.
During an interview, on 05/31/2023 at 10:15 AM, Resident #90 stated that last year he/she had five hundred dollars ($500) in his/her lock box which was in the top of the closet. He/she stated his/her lock box was missing. Resident #90 stated he/she did not know who might have taken his/her money. Since that incident, the resident stated he/she kept his/her money in the front office.
During an interview, on 06/01/2023 at 1:03 PM, with the Social Services Director (SSD), she stated she remembered everything Resident #90 said was in the lock box, and it was replaced. She stated that since the incident, maintenance had been securing the lock boxes to the residents' drawers. The SSD stated some residents did not want them secured, in which case maintenance did not secure them. She stated there was no policy specific to lock boxes and no monitoring tool, as they were private to residents. The SSD stated on admission, residents were informed of the option to set up a resident trust account and were discouraged from keeping valuables in their rooms. However, she stated, if residents chose to have a lock box, they were offered a lock box.
During an interview with the Administrator, on 06/01/2023 at 8:10 AM and again on 06/02/2023 at 1:29 PM, she stated during the facility's investigation into Resident #90's missing money and lock box, they had a large time frame of more than two (2) months. She stated they could not determine when the loss might have occurred. The Administrator stated the money was returned, and Resident #90 agreed to open a resident trust account. Additionally, the Administrator stated maintenance offered to affix lock boxes to furniture if the residents were agreeable. She stated it was ultimately the responsibility of the facility to protect residents from misappropriation.
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's policy it was determined the facility failed to ensure each residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's policy it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident's right to privacy and confidentiality of his/her personal and medical records for the residents on the 100 Hall. On 05/31/2023, observations during the initial facility rounds, revealed on three (3) occasions, the screen of the computer was sitting on top of the 100 Hall medication cart. The computer had been left open with the resident's information visible to anyone passing by the cart.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights-Kentucky, effective date 01/09/2020, under the section,State Resident Rights, item number seven (7) revealed all residents shall have confidential treatment of their medical and personal records.
Observations, on 05/31/2023 at 8:17 AM, 8:53 AM and 9:17 AM, revealed the medication cart, for the residents on the 100 Hall, was stationed across the hall from rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Further observations revealed the medication cart was unlocked and unattended. Observations revealed the computer screen was open and the residents' census information was visible.
Observation on 05/31/2023 at 9:17 AM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 walked up to cart with the keys.
In an interview on 06/01/2023 at 2:05 PM with LPN #4, she stated she left the medication cart unlocked on 05/31/2023. She stated that she left the computer screen up with visible resident information when she was not at her medication cart on the 100 Hallway. LPN #4 also stated when a nurse was standing at the cart it could be unlocked so she could access resident information. The LPN stated she was taught when standing at the cart and accessing the resident's information to set up medications, it was okay to have the computer screen up, but when she walked away from the cart to administer the medications, then she should close the computer screen to prevent a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability ACT (HIPAA) violation. LPN #4 stated it would become a resident privacy issue if the nurse was logged on and the screen was up and she walked away, then the resident's information could be seen by a passerby. However, she stated the person leaving the cart should ensure they closed the screen or logged off between each resident. LPN #4 stated she just shut the screen to prevent having to put in two (2) passwords to access information between resident medication passes. She stated at the end of the medication pass she would then log off. LPN #4 also stated she was taught about the screens and HIPAA in nursing school and got some training at this facility.
In an interview with the Director of Nursing, on 06/10/2023 at 10:00 AM, she stated staff assigned to a medication cart must ensure the computer screen was closed, or locked before walking away from the cart. She stated if that was not done, visitors or others would have access to the residents' health information, and that was a violation of their privacy.
In an interview, on 06/10/2023 at 9:44 AM with the Administrator, she stated going forward, she would have to round more constantly to ensure staff were protecting resident information. The Administrator stated they do make rounds to try to ensure the computer screens were locked or closed . Further, the Administrator stated it was not acceptable for residents' health information to be visible to anyone passing the medication carts. She stated that would be a violation of a resident's privacy rights.
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on interview, observation, record review and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on interview, observation, record review and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for eight (8) of forty-seven (47) sampled residents (Residents #8, #37, #57,#59, #71, #82 and #95 ).
On 06/20/2023, Resident #59 hit Resident #57 on his/her right posterior middle finger, with his/her Reacher. Further review of the facility's investigation revealed Resident #57 reported to staff that he/she wanted to go out into the hallway; however, Resident #59 was sitting in his/her way. Resident #57 further stated he/she grabbed Resident #59's reacher to keep Resident #59 off of him/her, which resulted in a skin tear.
On 10/10/2022, Resident #71 struck Resident #82 with his/her reacher (an assistive device used to retrieve items/objects), resulting in Resident #82 striking Resident #71 back with his/her reacher.
On 10/05/2022, Resident #8 struck Resident #59.
On 10/30/2022, Resident #37 slapped Resident #95 in the face while Resident #95 was sitting in his/her wheelchair in the main hallway.
On 02/03/2023, dietary staff reported she overheard a staff member Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #4) curse while providing care to Resident #88. On 06/02/2023, Resident #59 hit Resident #57 with his/her reacher.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights-Kentucky, effective date 01/09/2020, revealed all residents had the right to be free from mental and physical abuse.
Review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom from Abuse and Neglect, undated, revealed the facility defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Further review of the policy revealed examples of abuse included verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse.' The policy further revealed willful was defined as the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Continued review of the policy revealed the facility was responsible for protecting the residents from harm.
Review of the Facility's Investigation, dated 06/02/2023, revealed Resident #59 hit Resident #57 on his/her right posterior middle finger, with his/her Reacher. Further review of the facility's investigation revealed Resident #57 reported to staff that he/she wanted to go out into the hallway; however, Resident #59 was sitting in his/her way. Resident #57 further stated he/she grabbed Resident #59's reacher to keep Resident #59 off of him/her, which resulted in a skin tear.
1 a). Review of Resident #57's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/01/2021, with diagnoses to include: Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, and Spinal Stenosis.
Review of Resident #57's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed, the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven (11) out of fifteen (15) which indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition.
1 b). Review of Resident #59's admission record revealed the facility had admitted the resident on 07/08/2021 with diagnoses of heart failure, major depressive disorder, anxiety, atrial fibrillation, and hypothyroidism.
Review of Resident #59's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven (11) out of fifteen (15), which indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition.
During an interview, on 06/02/2023 at 2:20 PM, Resident #57 stated Resident #59 was swinging his/her reacher around and when he/she told Resident #59 that he/she was going to tell the nurse, Resident #59 said no and hit him/her with his/her reacher.
During interview, on 06/04/2023 at 8:50 PM, Family Member #2 stated Resident #59 told him/her that he/she was sitting in the doorway and Resident #57 was trying to get around him/her. Family Member #2 stated that Resident #57 told him that Resident #59 hit him/her with a reacher.
During an interview on 06/08/2023 at 11:00 AM, Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) #9 stated Resident #57 and Resident #59 were tugging back and forth with the reacher stick when she entered the room. CNA #9 stated Resident #57's hand was bleeding and Resident #57 had reported that Resident #59 had hit her him/her with the reacher.
During an interview on 06/08/2023 at 12:37 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #2, stated she was in her office and heard screaming coming from Resident #57 and Resident #59's room. RN #2 stated when she entered the residents' room, she observed both residents tugging on a reacher. RN #2 stated Resident #57's hand was bleeding and he/she reported that Resident #59 had hit him/her with the reacher. RN #2 stated Resident #59 and Resident #57 were separated and assessed.
During an interview, with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 06/08/2023 at 1:02 PM, she stated Resident #59 agreed to and was moved to another room. She also stated she expected staff to separate residents when any incident occurred and notify the DON or Administrator immediately with any allegations of abuse.
During an interview on 06/10/2023 at 9:34 AM, the Administrator stated she usually was the person to do the investigations and it was her expectation that the facility's policy be followed with all investigations.
Review of the facility's investigation, dated 10/05/2022, revealed Resident #8 entered Resident #59's room and struck Resident #59 on his/her arm and back. Resident #8 and Resident #59 were separated, and Resident #8 was placed on 1:1 supervision.
2 a). Review of Resident #8's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident, on 05/03/2018, with diagnoses of Dementia, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition.
Review of Resident #8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] revealed, the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4) out of fifteen (15) which indicated severely impaired cognition.
2 b). Review of Resident #59's admission record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 07/08/2021 with diagnoses of heart failure, major depressive disorder, anxiety, atrial fibrillation, hypothyroidism.
Review of Resident #59's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven (11) out of fifteen (15), which indicated moderately impaired cognition.
Review of the Nursing Progress Note, dated 10/05/2022 at 6:32 PM, entered by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #10 revealed Resident #59 was sitting in her/his room when another resident entered his/her room and struck Resident #59 on the upper left arm and back.
Review of the Facility Investigation revealed Resident #57 witnessed Resident #8 hit Resident #59.
During an interview on 06/01/2023 at 3:10 PM, LPN #10 stated Resident #59 reported that Resident #8 entered her/his room and struck him/her on the arm and back.
During an interview on 06/02/2023 at 1:28 PM, the Administrator stated, Resident #59 had reported that Resident #8 had hit him/her. Furthermore, the Administrator stated that her expectations were that the facility conducted investigations immediately.
3 a). Record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #36 on 09/15/2016 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease Unspecified, Unspecified Dementia Moderate with Mood Disturbance, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions due to Known Psychological Condition, and Diabetes Mellitus with Other Specified Complication.
Review of Resident #36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment, dated 10/26/2022, revealed Resident #36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of eight (8) out of fifteen (15) which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.
3 b). Review of Resident #95's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the facility admitted Resident #95 on 09/08/2021, with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance, and Unspecified Dementia of Unspecified Severity.
Review of Resident #95's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment, dated 10/03/2022, revealed Resident #95 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 99 which indicated the resident was severely impaired.
During a phone interview on 06/03/2023 at 10:25 AM with LPN #1, the nurse who gave the witness statement, dated 10/30/2022, she stated she was not present at the time the incident occurred, but she was around the corner. The LPN stated a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) grabbed her and told her about the incident. LPN #1 stated both Resident #36 and Resident #95 were in their wheelchairs in the hall at the time.
During an interview, on 05/31/2023 at 2:10 PM with Social Services Director (SSD) and the Social Services Aide (SSA) regarding the incident between Resident #36 and Resident #95 that occurred on 10/30/2022, the SSD stated the investigation was completed per the facility's policy. She also stated residents that were able to be interviewed were interviewed and those that could not be interviewed had skin assessments done. She stated that to her knowledge, no injuries were noted on either Resident #36 or Resident #95. Both the SSD and SSA stated the incident happened on the weekend and they both heard about the incident when they returned on Monday. Resident #95 was moved out of the room he/she and Resident #36 shared. SSD and SSA stated as far as they knew, there had been no further incidents with Resident #36 striking out at anyone. The SSD stated Resident #36 was usually calm and docile. The SSD stated sometimes Resident #95 called or cried out when he/she needed something, and SSD thought that may have possibly agitated Resident #36 at the time. The SSD and SSA both stated no residents should be abused in any way in the facility and it was the facility's responsibility to make sure all residents were safe and free from harm.
During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 06/02/2023 at 1:00 PM, she stated she had been the ADON since 09/2021. She also stated she could not remember much about the incident between Resident #36 and Resident #95. She stated when resident to resident altercations occur, the aggressor would be removed and placed on increased observation. The incident would then reported to the abuse coordinator, who was the Administrator. The ADON stated the Administrator was responsible for the facility's report.
During an interview with the Administrator on 06/02/2023 at 1:35 PM, she stated she was responsible for the full investigations into facility reported incidents and she would do the interviews and would write the reports. She stated she would interview the residents, staff, and family members if appropriate. The Administrator stated investigations should begin immediately and the facility's policy for reporting incidents should be followed. She also stated staff and family had all been educated to the importance of timely reporting. She further stated it was the ultimate responsibility of the facility to protect residents from abuse and misappropriation.
Review of a facility investigation, dated 10/10/2022, revealed at approximately 7:00 PM, Resident #84 came up to the nurses' station and informed LPN #7 that his/her roommate, Resident #71, had accused him/her of huffing paint and had struck Resident #84 on the head several times with his/her reacher. In return, Resident #84 stated he/she struck Resident #71 back in the leg with his/her reacher. Continued review of the facility's investigation revealed both residents were assessed without any injuries noted. Further review revealed Resident #71 was moved to a different room, and Resident #84 was placed on one-on-one (1:1) supervision until he/she was seen by psych. Additionally, both residents' care plans were updated following the incident.
4 a). Review of Resident #71's electronic health record (EHR) revealed the facility admitted Resident #71 on 08/20/2020 with diagnoses to include Peripheral Vascular Disease Unspecified, COPD Unspecified, and Cirrhosis of the Liver. On 03/29/2023, a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia Unspecified Severity without Behavioral Disturbance was added. The facility assessed Resident #71 in a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] as 14/15 BIMS, which indicated no cognitive impairment.
4 b). Review of Resident #84's EHR revealed the facility admitted Resident #84 on 03/29/2021 with diagnoses that included Encounter for Orthopedic Aftercare Following Surgical Amputation, Hypertension Secondary to Other Renal Disorders, and Hyperlipidemia Unspecified. The facility care planned the resident for history of physical and verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #84 was placed on 1:1 supervision on 10/11/2022, which resolved on 10/31/2022. The facility assessed Resident #84 in a Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] as 15/15 BIMS, which indicated no cognitive impairment.
During interview on 05/31/2023 at 9:45 AM, with Resident #71, he/she stated that he/she had been in every room in this place, and when asked about this, the resident stated there were some people he/she could get along with, and some people he/she couldn't get along with.
Resident #84 stated during interview on 06/01/2023 at 8:50 AM, that on 10/10/2022 he/she had just finished eating supper in bed, and had gotten up in his/her wheelchair when his/her roommate, Resident #71, started waylaying him/her in the head with a reacher. Resident #84 stated Resident #71 was accusing him/her of huffing red paint. Resident #84 stated he/she took the reacher away from Resident #71 and struck Resident #84 back with it, then went into the hall and let LPN #7 know. Resident #84 stated LPN #7 separated them, moving Resident #71 to a different room. Resident #84 stated nothing like that had ever happened before, and that he/she wasn't injured.
Interview on 06/01/2023 at 8:23 AM, with LPN #7, she stated she recalled on 10/10/2022 (could not recall the time) Resident #84 came up to the nurses' station, and stated that Resident #71 had hit him/her and he/she hit Resident #71 back with the grabber. LPN #7 stated she made sure they stayed separated, assessed them both, and called the Administrator. The LPN stated she completed both skin assessments, and pain assessments, and neither resident had issues with skin or pain. She stated Resident #84 stated he/she was getting out of bed, when Resident #71 took his/her reacher and hit him/her. LPN #7 stated Resident #84 told her that he/she took the reacher from Resident #71 and struck Resident #71 back. The LPN stated there was no paint involved. LPN #7 described Resident #71 as quite often confused, although with no prior history of striking anyone. LPN #7 stated there had been no other incidents with either resident.
During interview on 06/01/2023 at 1:03 PM, with the Social Services Director (SSD), she stated she was present during the time of the allegation involving Resident #84 and Resident #71. She stated she wasn't sure what provoked Resident #71 to strike Resident #84 with his/her reacher. She stated she recalled Resident #84 was very upset after the incident. She stated Resident #71 gets confused sometimes.
Interview with the Administrator on 06/01/2023 at 8:10 AM, and again on 06/02/2023 at 1:29 PM, she stated both Resident #71 and Resident #84 had reachers to get items that they couldn't reach. She stated at the time of the incident, Resident #84 could self-transfer, now he/she was dependent on staff for assistance. The Administrator stated Resident #71 was and remained dependent on staff for transfers and ambulation. She stated prior to the incident, Resident #71 had some cursing and getting frustrated at staff, but nothing physical. The Administrator stated there was no painting going on, and no opportunity for Resident #84 to be huffing paint.
5 a). Observation of Resident #88 on 05/31/2023 at 9:10 AM, revealed the resident was in his/her bed with staff providing personal care. Continued observation revealed no bruises/injuries were noted to the resident.
Review of Resident #88's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #88 on 07/03/2021 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, with behavioral disturbance, functional quadriplegia, unspecified psychosis, and impulsiveness.
Review of Resident #88's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five (5) out of fifteen (15), which indicated the resident had severe impaired cognition. Continued review revealed Resident #88 required total dependence with two (2) person staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and bathing.
Review of Resident #88's care plan initiated on 09/14/2021, revealed the resident had mood and behavior problems related to cerebral infarction, and communication deficit. Further review revealed Resident #88 had a history of disrobing, combative with staff, verbally abusive to staff during care; physically aggressive with staff including grabbing/pinching/hitting at staff during personal care. Further review revealed care planned interventions included: staff to encourage diversional acts of choice, when combative with care or verbal behaviors, allow for a brief rest period and attempted care later. On 12/16/2021 a revision was initiated to cue, reorient and supervise resident as needed.
Review of the Facility's Investigation, dated 02/03/2023, revealed Resident #88 cursed at staff during care, and dietary staff witnessed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #4 curse at the resident. The staff overheard CNA #4 curse back at Resident #88 as she was providing personal care. The facility suspended CNA #4 pending investigation. Further review of the facility's investigation five (5) day final report revealed the facility determined that abuse could not be validated as CNA #4 cursed in response to pain and it was not directed toward the resident.
Interview on 05/31/2023 at 10:20 AM, Resident #88 stated he/she did not recall the incident when CNA #4 verbally cursed at him/her during care. However, the resident stated he/she grabbed, pinched and said inappropriate language to the staff, but denied abuse from staff and/or residents.
During interview on 06/01/2023 at 9:12 AM, with Dietary Aide (DA) #1 she stated she would change out daily menus on each unit and on the morning of the incident around 5:30 AM, she was on the 200-Unit when she heard Resident #88, yelling and hollering, stop it. DA #1 stated she observed and overheard CNA #4 inform the resident to shut up, the resident in turn said, Fuck you to CNA #4, and she in turn said Fuck you right back to the resident. During interview with DA #1, she stated she immediately informed LPN #4. She stated LPN #4 responded that she would take care of the situation; however, the LPN did not request her written statement. Also, DA #1 stated at approximately 8:30 AM she reported the incident to her manager, with a written statement. In addition, DA #1 stated CNA #4 was suspended for approximately three (3) days; however, she came back and was currently caring for residents.
CNA #4 stated during interview, on 06/01/2023 at 4:45 PM, that she reviewed residents' Kardexes to ensure appropriate care and safety. She stated she was familiar with Resident #88 and the resident could be combative, loose with words and was inappropriate touching staff at times. CNA #4 stated the resident had severe contractures, bad eyesight and when staff turned/rolled him/her, the resident would get upset. She stated Resident #88 could be very inappropriate with sexual verbiage and touching. Continued interview with CNA #4 revealed on 02/03/2023 at approximately 5:00 AM, during last rounds she was providing personal care to Resident #88, as she was turning the resident, he/she grabbed her breast and twisted. She stated it hurt, and instantly, without thinking said fuck, that hurt, and the resident responded with, fuck you . CNA #4 stated she told the resident he/she could not be touching anyone like that, it was very inappropriate. In addition, she stated she did not mean to say it, it was an accident, an immediate response and was not directed towards the resident. The CNA stated she informed the supervisor that morning after rounds, not sure if she reported; however, that morning he received a call from the facility that she was suspended until the incident was fully investigated. She stated she gave an interview statement. Upon returning, prior to resident care, she was educated on abuse and the resident's plan of care.
The Dietary Manager (DM) stated during interview, on 06/02/2023 at 10:44 AM, that she came into the facility on [DATE] at 8:30 AM that morning for work. She stated DA #1, informed her that when putting up menus she heard Resident #88 yell out fuck you to CNA #4. The DA told her that CNA #4 in return said, fuck you back to the resident. She stated she informed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8, who was on the unit, sometime between 5:30 AM and 6:00 AM. However, the DM stated she informed the Administrator at approximately 9:00 AM, before the morning meeting.
LPN #9 stated during interview on 06/02/2023 at 1:24 PM, that on 02/03/2023 about 6:30 AM, a dietary staff (DA#1) approached her to inform that she did not like what she heard from another staff member directed towards Resident #88. LPN #7 stated she immediately had her complete a witness statement, and took it to management. She stated they addressed the incident at the Morning Meeting at 9:30 AM. She stated DA #1 informed her that she had already made the house supervisor, LPN #7 aware of the situation and when it happened. LPN #9 stated DA #1 stated she was not sure LPN #7, had informed management of the incident, nor started an incident report.
During interview on 06/02/2023 at 2:20 PM, with LPN #7, she stated on 02/03/2023, early morning while doing their rounds, a kitchen staff member (DA #1) came and informed her of a staff member, CNA #4, had said cuss words in Resident #88's room. LPN #7 stated she pulled CNA #4 out of the room, and she told her what happened at the time. The LPN stated she informed CNA #4 that she could not do that. However,she did not do an incident report, nor did she did inform anyone. LPN #7 stated she did not believe the way CNA #4 said it, that it was not intentional. However, looking back and reeducated, she would call the Administrator.
The Director of Nursing (DON) stated during interview on 06/08/2023 at 1:10 PM, that staff had been educated on the importance of getting assistance when providing care actions with residents that have aggressive actions/behaviors. She stated she also informed the staff to be cognizant of their speech when in residents' areas. The DON stated she expected staff to notify the her or the Administrator immediately with any allegations of abuse.
During an interview with the Executive Director (ED), on 06/02/2023 at 1:35 PM, she stated the Administrator was responsible for the full investigations into facility reported incidents. The ED stated she conducted the interviews and wrote the reports. The ED stated she interviewed residents, staff and family members if appropriate. She stated investigations should begin immediately. The ED stated the facility's policy for reporting incidents should be followed. She stated staff and family had all been educated to the importance of timely reporting. The ED stated it was the ultimate responsibility of the facility to protect residents from abuse.
Review of a facility investigation, dated 10/10/2022, revealed at approximately 7:00 PM, Resident #84 came up to the nurses' station and informed LPN #7 that his/her roommate, Resident #71, had accused him/her of huffing paint and had struck Resident #84 on the head several times with his/her reacher. In return, Resident #84 stated he/she struck Resident #71 back in the leg with his/her reacher. Continued review of the facility's investigation revealed both residents were assessed without any injuries noted. Further review revealed Resident #71 was moved to a different room, and Resident #84 was placed on one-on-one (1:1) supervision until he/she was seen by psych. Additionally, both residents' care plans were updated following the incident.
6 a). Review of Resident #71's electronic health record (EHR) revealed the facility admitted Resident #71 on 08/20/2020 with diagnoses to include Peripheral Vascular Disease Unspecified, COPD Unspecified, and Cirrhosis of the Liver. On 03/29/2023, a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia Unspecified Severity without Behavioral Disturbance was added. The facility assessed Resident #71 in a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] as 14/15 BIMS, which indicated no cognitive impairment.
6 b). Review of Resident #84's EHR revealed the facility admitted Resident #84 on 03/29/2021 with diagnoses that included Encounter for Orthopedic Aftercare Following Surgical Amputation, Hypertension Secondary to Other Renal Disorders, and Hyperlipidemia Unspecified. The facility care planned the resident for history of physical and verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #84 was placed on 1:1 supervision on 10/11/2022, which resolved on 10/31/2022. The facility assessed Resident #84 in a Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] as 15/15 BIMS, which indicated no cognitive impairment.
During interview on 05/31/2023 at 9:45 AM, with Resident #71, he/she stated that he/she had been in every room in this place, and when asked about this, the resident stated there were some people he/she could get along with, and some people he/she couldn't get along with. When asked about any specific conflicts with other residents, Resident #71 became confused, and no information regarding any incidents could be obtained.
Resident #84 stated during interview on 06/01/2023 at 8:50 AM, that on 10/10/2022 he/she had just finished eating supper in bed, and had gotten up in his/her wheelchair when his/her roommate, Resident #71, started waylaying him/her in the head with a reacher. Resident #84 stated Resident #71 was accusing him/her of huffing red paint. Resident #84 stated he/she took the reacher away from Resident #71 and struck Resident #84 back with it, then went into the hall and let LPN #7 know. Resident #84 stated LPN #7 separated them, moving Resident #71 to a different room. Resident #84 stated nothing like that had ever happened before, and that he/she wasn't injured.
Interview on 06/01/2023 at 8:23 AM, with LPN #7, she stated she recalled on 10/10/2022 (could not recall the time) Resident #84 came up to the nurses' station, and stated that Resident #71 had hit him/her and he/she hit Resident #71 back with the grabber. LPN #7 stated she made sure they stayed separated, assessed them both, and called the Administrator. The LPN stated she completed both skin assessments, and pain assessments, and neither resident had issues with skin or pain. She stated Resident #84 stated he/she was getting out of bed, when Resident #71 took his/her reacher and hit him/her. LPN #7 stated Resident #84 told her that he/she took the reacher from Resident #71 and struck Resident #71 back. The LPN stated there was no paint involved. LPN #7 described Resident #71 as quite often confused, although with no prior history of striking anyone. LPN #7 stated there had been no other incidents with either resident.
During interview on 06/01/2023 at 1:03 PM, with the Social Services Director (SSD), she stated she was present during the time of the allegation involving Resident #84 and Resident #71. She stated she wasn't sure what provoked Resident #71 to strike Resident #84 with his/her reacher. She stated she recalled Resident #84 was very upset after the incident. She stated Resident #71 gets confused sometimes.
Interview with the Administrator on 06/01/2023 at 8:10 AM, and again on 06/02/2023 at 1:29 PM, she stated both Resident #71 and Resident #84 had reachers to get items that they couldn't reach. She stated at the time of the incident, Resident #84 could self-transfer, now he/she was dependent on staff for assistance. The Administrator stated Resident #71 was and remained dependent on staff for transfers and ambulation. She stated prior to the incident, Resident #71 had some cursing and getting frustrated at staff, but nothing physical. The Administrator stated there was no painting going on, and no opportunity for Resident #84 to be huffing paint.
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to store all drugs and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and under proper temperature control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all medications and/or biological supplies stored on the 200 Hallway medication storage room had not expired.
On 05/31/2023, 06/01/2023, and again on 06/09/2023, three (3) licensed nurses assigned to medication (med) carts on the 100 and 200 hallways failed to lock their med carts when away from the carts.
On 06/07/2023, the thermometer in the medication refrigerator on the 300 Hallway, registered 64 degrees Fahrenheit.(F). However, according to the log posted on the refrigerator door, the refrigerator temperature should be below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Further review of the log posted on the refrigerator indicated temperatures had not been measured and documented twice daily in the month of June 2023. Observation, on 06/09/2023 of the 200 Hallway medication storage room revealed there were expired products available for use.
The findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised November 2020, revealed: The facility stored all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Bullet number three (3) of the policy indicated the nursing staff was responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Bullet six (6) of the policy indicated compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals were locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts were not left unattended.
Observations, on 05/31/2023 at 8:53 AM and again at 9:17 AM, revealed an unlocked, unattended medication cart parked between the main hallway and the 100 Hall resident care area. Further observation revealed the drawers faced outward and were accessible to anyone passing by.
In an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 on 06/01/2023 at 2:05 PM, LPN #4 stated on 05/31/2023 she was not aware that she walked away and left the cart unlocked. However, she should have locked the medication cart when she walked away from it. LPN #4 said before leaving the cart, the nurse and/or medication aide should always lock the cart. She stated leaving the medication cart unlocked was unsafe because wandering and confused residents could possibly access the contents of the cart. She stated there were some confused and wandering residents living on the 100 Hallway, and she specifically mentioned Residents #36, #46, and #65.
During an observation of the 200 Hallway on 06/01/2023 at 8:46 AM, revealed an unlocked, unattended medication cart parked outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] with the drawers facing outward, accessible to anyone passing by the cart.
In an interview, on 06/01/2023 at 1:45 PM, with LPN #11, he stated he was an agency nurse, and this was his second time working at the facility. The LPN stated he was aware he left his medication cart unlocked while he was in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. He stated he thought as long as he could reach out from the resident's room and touch the cart, then it was okay to leave it unlocked. LPN #11 stated he was in the room administering Resident #88's medications, but realized he had forgotten to bring in the resident's inhaler and a cup of water, so he returned to the medication cart to get the items. LPN #11 stated the medication cart should remain locked, when unattended, so that no one else could get into it and take the residents' medications. He stated the 200 Hallway Unit Manager (UM) informed him there were three (3) residents who tended to wander about the unit, and that he should keep an eye on them. However, at the time of the interview, he stated he could not remember their names. He stated he had not received any education/training on securing residents' medications since he had worked at the facility.
During an observation on the 200 Hallway, on 06/09/2023 at 8:10 AM, an unlocked medication (med) cart was parked near the 200 hallway nurses' station. Further observation revealed the cart was not visible to the nurse who was assigned to the cart. Observation revealed LPN #12 was standing at the nurses' station, but a tall divider/computer shelf prevented the LPN from seeing the unlocked cart. The medication drawers were facing outward, and accessible to passersby. One resident was seated in his/her wheelchair near the cart.
Before entering the 200 Hallway medication storage room with the State Survey Agency (SSA) Surveyor, the LPN briefly stepped outside the nurses' station to speak with with a resident, and then noted and locked the medication cart.
In an interview, on 06/09/2023 at 12:50 PM, LPN #12 stated she was an agency nurse, and it had been about a year since she had worked at the facility. She stated she received some training that morning before starting her shift, and she thought the instruction on keeping medications locked and secured had been discussed during that brief training session. The LPN stated she was unsure why she had left the medication cart unlocked. LPN #12 stated medication carts should remain locked when not in sight of the nurse who was assigned to the cart, because one never knew who might get into the cart and remove the medications. The LPN stated if a confused resident opened the cart he/she could potentially ingest some of the medications. She stated since she had not worked on the unit until today. The LPN stated she would be unable to identify residents on the unit who might be confused or disoriented.
Observation on 06/07/2023 at 2:45 PM, revealed the thermometer inside the 300 Hallway medication refrigerator read sixty-four (64) degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the refrigerator temperature log posted on the outside door of the refrigerator, titled Cooler/Freezer Temperature Log, June 2023, 300; Med Room, indicated the refrigerator temperatures were to be checked in the AM and in the PM (twice) over a twenty-four hour period, seven (7) days per week. The directions indicated the medication refrigerator should be below 41 degrees F. However, review of the log for the month of June 2023 revealed the temperature readings were missing for the PM reading on 06/ 01/2023; the AM and PM readings on 06/02/2023; the AM temperature reading on 06/03/2023; the AM reading on 06/04/2023; and the AM and PM readings on 06/05/2023.
Observations on 06/07/2023 at 2:45 PM, of the contents of the refrigerator included: one (1) Novolog Insulin Pen for Resident #23, one (1) Insulin Glargine (Lantus) Solostar Insulin Pen for Resident #44; three (3) full boxes of Arformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Solution packets, thirty (30) per box, and one (1) additional box with twenty-three (23) packets remaining. Additional contents of the refrigerator included Emergency Drug Kit (EDK) medications that included: one (1) bottle of Lorazepam 2 milligrams (mgs)/milliliter (ml); two (2) Levemir Insulin Flex Pens 100 mg/ml; 2 Lantus Insulin Solostar pens 100 units/ml; four (4) Humalog Insulin Flex Pens 100 units/ml; and 3 Novolog insulin pens, 100 units/ml.
In interview, on 06/07/2023 at 2:45 PM, the 300 Hallway Unit Manager (UM) stated she thought the medication refrigerator temperature range should stay around thirty-six (36) to forty-six (46) degrees. She stated medications must be stored at the appropriate temperatures to ensure the medications remained effective for use. The Unit Manager stated a licensed nurse on each twelve (12) hour shift should read and record the refrigerator temperature on the paper log posted on the front of the medication refrigerator. She stated if she happened to see any missing temperature readings, she would have the nurses fill in the temperature reading on the log. The 300 Hallway UM stated she had been the UM for about 2 to 3 weeks, and had not noticed that several refrigerator temperatures had not been recorded twice daily as, required.
In an interview on 06/09/2023 at 3:50 PM with Kentucky Medication Aide (KMA) #24, the KMA stated she worked night shift on 06/07/2023, and noted that some of the refrigerator temperatures had not been recorded as expected, but she did not report that to the 300 Hallway UM. She stated she told the nurse on duty, but the nurse said staff could not go back in and document temperatures after the fact. KMA #24 stated staff was supposed to check the temperature in the refrigerator, and document the result on the paper log every shift. She stated monitoring and recording the refrigerator temperatures would help staff identify any issues with the function of the medication refrigerator, and prevent medications from becoming ineffective or unsafe for resident use.
During an observation, on 06/09/2023 at 8:14 AM of supplies stored in the 200 hallway medication room the following items were found expired: One (1) Fisherbrand microorganism collection transport system (culture swab set), had an expiration date of 08/17/2022; 2 packaged Heparin Lock flush syringes, five (5) mls each had an expiration date of 06/01/2023; 2 BBL culture swab collection systems, with an expiration date of 08/31/2021, and 1 Secondary Intravenous (IV) administration set 20 drops per ml, with an expiration date of 10/27/2021.
In interview on 06/09/2023 at 2:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated licensed nurses should know that medication carts must remain locked when they were not attended. The DON stated, when making Unit rounds, the ADON, and the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) monitored to ensure medication carts were locked, but they had not completed an audit to determine if there was a pattern of unlocked carts on certain hallways, or repeated instances by any particular staff members. She stated when she made rounds and observed an unlocked med cart, she locked it and educated the staff member assigned to that cart. The DON stated medications must always be securely stored because confused residents might access the medications, and might think the pills were candy. She stated a member of the public might try to take the medications from an unlocked cart. Further, the DON stated she would not want the medications to be opened, or moved around in the cart disorganizing or possibly damaging them.
During continued interview with the DON, on 06/09/2023 at 2:30 PM, regarding expired products in the 200 Hallway medication storage room, the DON stated all medications and biologicals available for resident care should be in date. She stated staff could not be sure if expired supplies were safe and effective for use. The DON stated staff should measure and record the medication refrigerator temperatures on the log posted on the exterior of the refrigerator to ensure the temperatures remained in range for proper/safe storage of the contents; to detect in any out-of-range temperatures; and in order to report them to the UM. The DON stated the Kentucky Medication Aide should ensure the refrigerator temperatures were recorded on the log each shift. The DON stated the log posted on the 300 Hallway medication refrigerator on 06/07/2023, during the State Survey Agency Surveyor's observation, was a version that the UM posted, but it was not the corporate generated log which indicated the medication refrigerator temperatures should be between 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit, according to the United States Pharmacopoeia Guidelines.
In interview with the Executive Director (ED), on 06/10/2023 at 9:34 AM, she stated the UMs should be reviewing the medication refrigerator temperature logs daily to ensure staff were consistently monitoring the temperature to ensure the refrigerator remained at an temperature range for storing medications. She stated the UMs, and other nursing managers should observe the medication carts to ensure they remained locked when not in use. She stated the DON should report any identified staff noncompliance with safe storage of medications, and any expired medications or biologicals found in the medication rooms, because she wanted to participate in corrective action for those types of issues. She stated going forward, managers would increase monitoring on the units to identify noncompliance, and provide additional staff education, as needed. The ED stated if there was continued non-compliance among the staff, then she would have to take other steps to address the issues.