The Lodge at Tangi Pines
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Lodge at Tangi Pines has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's care quality. Ranking #169 out of 264 nursing homes in Louisiana puts it in the bottom half, and #5 out of 6 in Tangipahoa County suggests limited local options with only one facility performing better. The facility is reportedly improving, having reduced issues from 7 to 6 over the past year. Staffing is a relative strength, rated at 4 out of 5 stars, but with a turnover rate of 51%, it is slightly above the state average. However, the facility has accumulated $133,030 in fines, which is concerning and higher than 87% of Louisiana facilities, indicating ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents reported include a failure to protect a resident's funds from misappropriation, leading to emotional distress, and an instance of nonconsensual behavior between residents, which caused psychosocial harm. Additionally, food storage practices were criticized for not meeting safety standards, potentially affecting all residents served from the kitchen. Overall, while there are some strengths in staffing, the serious issues related to care quality and compliance should be carefully considered by families.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Louisiana
- #169/264
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $133,030 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 17 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Louisiana average (2.4)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Louisiana avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
6 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(H)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's personal funds were not susceptible to misappropriation by an employee of the facility for 1 (#46) of 21 residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving misappropriated funds were re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's stat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was revised by failing to update ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure food was proper...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to p...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all complaint surveys since the last annual survey were available for resident review.
Findings:
An observation was ma...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(H)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from psycho...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported immediately, to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident of resident to resident sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (#3) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for 1 (#3) of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of verbal and physical abuse were report...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that an alleged violation of abuse was thoroughly in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were maintained in a safe manner in a locked compartment for 1 (MCa) of 3 (MCa, MCb, and MCc) medicine car...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 harm violation(s), $133,030 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 16 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $133,030 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (15/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is The Lodge At Tangi Pines's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns The Lodge at Tangi Pines an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is The Lodge At Tangi Pines Staffed?
CMS rates The Lodge at Tangi Pines's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at The Lodge At Tangi Pines?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at The Lodge at Tangi Pines during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 13 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates The Lodge At Tangi Pines?
The Lodge at Tangi Pines is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 100 certified beds and approximately 94 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Amite, Louisiana.
How Does The Lodge At Tangi Pines Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, The Lodge at Tangi Pines's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Lodge At Tangi Pines?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is The Lodge At Tangi Pines Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, The Lodge at Tangi Pines has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at The Lodge At Tangi Pines Stick Around?
The Lodge at Tangi Pines has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was The Lodge At Tangi Pines Ever Fined?
The Lodge at Tangi Pines has been fined $133,030 across 2 penalty actions. This is 3.9x the Louisiana average of $34,409. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is The Lodge At Tangi Pines on Any Federal Watch List?
The Lodge at Tangi Pines is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.