The Lodge at Tangi Pines

10746 Hwy 16, Amite, LA 70422 (985) 748-9464
For profit - Corporation 100 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
15/100
#169 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

The Lodge at Tangi Pines has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's care quality. Ranking #169 out of 264 nursing homes in Louisiana puts it in the bottom half, and #5 out of 6 in Tangipahoa County suggests limited local options with only one facility performing better. The facility is reportedly improving, having reduced issues from 7 to 6 over the past year. Staffing is a relative strength, rated at 4 out of 5 stars, but with a turnover rate of 51%, it is slightly above the state average. However, the facility has accumulated $133,030 in fines, which is concerning and higher than 87% of Louisiana facilities, indicating ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents reported include a failure to protect a resident's funds from misappropriation, leading to emotional distress, and an instance of nonconsensual behavior between residents, which caused psychosocial harm. Additionally, food storage practices were criticized for not meeting safety standards, potentially affecting all residents served from the kitchen. Overall, while there are some strengths in staffing, the serious issues related to care quality and compliance should be carefully considered by families.

Trust Score
F
15/100
In Louisiana
#169/264
Bottom 36%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 6 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$133,030 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 17 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 6 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Near Louisiana average (2.4)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 51%

Near Louisiana avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $133,030

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Apr 2025 6 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (H) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's personal funds were not susceptible to misappropriation by an employee of the facility for 1 (#46) of 21 residents re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's personal funds were not susceptible to misappropriation by an employee of the facility for 1 (#46) of 21 residents reviewed in the initial pool. The facility failed to protect Resident #46 from misappropriation of funds by S9CNA which lead to Resident #46 experiencing psychosocial harm. This deficient practice resulted in physical and emotional harm on 03/28/2025, when Resident #46 experienced vomiting, depression, shame and embarrassment due to financial manipulation by S9CNA. The facility implemented corrective actions, which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Program, with no revision date, revealed the following, in part: Intent: This protocol was intended to assist the prevention of abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property. Each resident has the right to be free from financial abuse. Definitions: Misappropriation of property/financial abuse is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful temporary or permanent, use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. A review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admit date of 07/16/2024 with a BIMS of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #46's Incident Report dated 04/02/2025 at 5:04 p.m., revealed Resident #46 reported to S1ADM she had been giving money to S9CNA since October 2024. Resident #46 stated she gave S9CNA approximately $7530.00. On 04/29/2025 at 10:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident # 46. She stated S9CNA manipulated her into giving the money beginning in October 2024. She stated S9CNA set up a money transferring account on her phone using a fake name so no one would find out the about the money exchange. Resident #46 stated she started giving S9CNA money because she was hungry and had no money for lunch. Resident #46 stated she felt sorry for S9CNA and wanted to help her. She stated S9CNA would ask for lunch money two and three times a week. Resident #46 stated S9CNA began telling her she needed money to repair her car or money to buy parts to repair her car. She stated S9CNA would tell her the car parts were wrong and additional parts were needed. Resident #46 stated she gave S9CNA money to repair pipes in her home she claimed has frozen during the freeze. She stated she gave S9CNA money for her children's birthday after S9CNA told her she had no money for their birthdays. She stated she started noticing that the CNA was coming into her room talking on her cell phone saying things like I know, I will figure it out and I'll get the money and then S9CNA would ask for money. Resident #46 stated she told S8CNA on a Friday evening, unable to recall date, about giving S9CNA money. Resident #46 stated on 04/02/2024 she reported the issue to S1ADM. Resident #46 stated the facility contacted the local police, but she did not want to press charges at that time. She stated she felt ashamed, embarrassed, and taken advantage of. On 04/29/2025 at 10:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident # 46. She stated beginning in October 2024, S9CNA would come into her room and tell her she was hungry and did not have money for food. She said she felt sorry for the CNA and wanted to help. She stated S9CNA set up a money transferring account on her phone using a fake name so no one would find out the about the money exchange. Resident #46 explained S9CNA would ask her for lunch money 2 to 3 times a week. S9CNA asked her for money to repair her car, repair the pipes in her home, and for her children's birthday. She said towards the end of March, she realized how much money she had given to the CNA and got scared. She said S9CNA manipulated her. Resident #46 stated she was not feeling well because of the situation and told S8CNA on a Friday evening, unable to recall date, about giving S9CNA money. Resident #46 stated on 04/02/2024 she reported the issue to S1ADM. Resident #46 stated the facility contacted the local police and the police talked to her. She stated she felt ashamed, embarrassed, and taken advantage of. She said she started taking medicine after she reported the incident to help her sleep. On 04/29/2025 at 6:00 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S8CNA. S8CNA stated on 03/28/2025, she noticed Resident #46 was vomiting, not eating, did not want to get out of bed, and was not her normal self. S8CNA asked Resident #46 what was wrong, and the resident told her about the money she had been giving to S9CNA. S8CNA stated she spoke with S7ADON on 03/29/2025 and reported the incident. On 04/29/2025 at 1:36 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7ADON. S7ADON stated S8CNA informed her on 03/29/2025 that Resident #46 had been giving S9CNA money. S7ADON stated she notified S2DON on 03/31/2025 of the incident. On 04/30/2025 at 1:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON stated he was notified by S7ADON on 03/31/2025 of the incident involving Resident #46 giving money to S9CNA. S2DON stated he notified S1ADM by phone on 04/01/2025. On 04/30/2025 at 09:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM stated on 04/01/2025 he received a phone call from the S2DON informing him that Resident #46 had given a staff member money. He stated on 04/02/2025 when he arrived at the facility, he met with Resident #46. Resident #46 told him she had given S9CNA money multiple times beginning in October 2024. Resident #46 stated that she was giving S9CNA money to help her but it had gotten out of hand. S1ADM stated Resident #46 told him she had given S9CNA approximately $8,600.00 in total since October 2024. S1ADM stated he, S2DON, and S7ADON called S9CNA in to his office on the morning of 04/02/2025 and asked her if she had taken money form Resident #46. S1ADM stated S9CNA confessed she had taken the money. S1ADM stated after S9CNA's admission of guilt she was terminated on 04/02/2025. S1ADM stated he notified the local police on 04/02/2025. S1ADM stated the local police deputy came to the facility and spoke with Resident #46 on 04/02/2025. S1ADM stated at this time he opened a SIMs report. He confirmed S9CNA misappropriated Resident #46's funds, and should not have. S1ADM stated on 04/02/2025 all residents were interviewed asking each one if they had ever been ask to or given staff money. S1ADM stated on 04/02/2025-04/09/2025 all staff were in-serviced on misappropriation of funds. S1ADM stated the Ombudsman was notified. He stated Resident #46's physician was notified along with the Facility's psychiatrist mental health nurse practitioner and both evaluated the resident. S1ADM stated he notified the CNA registry and reported the incident. He stated since the incident, Social services here at the facility has been communicating with the resident to make sure she was okay emotionally and mentally. He stated resident council meeting was also held and led by S1ADM. S1ADM stated he went over the facility policy on abuse and specified, especially financial abuse. From 04/28/2025-04/30/2025 multiple attempts were made to contact S9CNA. The attempts were unsuccessful. On 04/30/2025 at 11:05 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11LPN. She stated she attended in-services regarding reporting of abuse, neglect and misappropriation of funds to administration immediately after the incident with Resident #46 on 04/02/2025. She stated taking money for any reason from a resident is a reportable offense and she would report to the DON or the Administrator immediately. On 04/30/2025 at 11:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10CNA. He stated he had attended in-services on misappropriation of funds after the incident involving Resident #46 on 04/02/2025. He stated the in-service covered not accepting money from residents for any reason and to report an allegation immediately. Throughout the survey from 04/28/2025 to 04/30/2025, observations, record review, and staff interviews revealed staff received training on misappropriation of funds and reporting policies and procedures. Interviews revealed staff were knowledgeable of the types of exploitation, and were aware to report these incidents to administration immediately. The facility had implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: One resident was affected by this practice. There is no evidence through our interviews and investigation that this occurred to any other resident. Corrective actions and measures that have been put into place. 1. Our immediate actions were that law-enforcement was contacted, all residents were interviewed to make sure that this has not happened to anyone else in parentheses it has not parentheses. All staff was in serviced on this issue. Ombudsman was notified. Resident physician was notified. Facilities psychiatrist mental health nurse practitioner was notified and has seen the resident. The CNA registry has been notified. Social services here at the facility has been communicating with the resident to make sure she was okay emotionally and mentally. A resident council meeting was held and led by S1ADM. We went over our policy on abuse and specified, especially financial abuse. 2. Our plan of correction started on 04/02/2025 with contacting law-enforcement, opening a facility self-reported incident report, interview, interviews, and in servicing. All staff have been in-serviced on misappropriation of funds/exploitation. All residents have been interviewed and our plan of correction stop date was 04/09/2025 once we completed our corrective action plans. Sims report was closed on 04/09/2025. 3. The end date for our plan of correction was 04/09/2025. We will continue to in-service, education, train and evaluate during our QA process moving forward. A part of our QA process we will be for four consecutive weeks starting Monday 04/14/2025, we will do three random interviews a week to make sure no other resident have been exploited financially. We will also do three random tests a week for four consecutive weeks on staff regarding reporting any potential abuse. The facility will view these interviews and test in our next QA meeting.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving misappropriated funds were re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving misappropriated funds were reported to the administrator immediately and to the state agency within twenty four hours after the allegations were made for 1 (#46) of 21 residents reviewed in the initial pool. The facility implemented corrective actions, which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Program, with no revision date, revealed the following, in part: Intent: This protocol was intended to assist the prevention of abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property. Each resident has the right to be free from financial abuse. Definitions: Misappropriation of property/financial abuse is defined as the deliberated misplacement, exploitation or wrongful temporary or permanent, use of a resident belongings or money without the resident's consent. A review of Resident #46's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 09/20/2024 revealed Resident #46 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. A review of the facility's self-reported incident dated 04/02/2025 revealed, in part: Entered: 04/02/2025 at 05:04 p.m. Discovered: 04/02/2025 at 11:00 a.m. Victim Name: Resident #46 Accused Name: S9CNA Accused Allegations Misappropriation of Funds/Exploitation On 04/29/2025 at 10:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident # 46. Resident #46 stated she started giving S9CNA money in October 2024. Resident #46 stated one Friday evening, she could not recall the date, she told S8CNA that S9CNA was asking for money. Resident #46 stated on 04/02/2024 she also reported the issue to S1ADM. On 04/29/2025 at 6:00 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S8CNA. S8CNA stated on 03/28/2025 at 10:00 p.m. Resident #46 old her she had given money to S9CNA. S8CNA stated she reported the incident to S7ADON, her supervisor, on 03/29/2025. She stated she attended an in-service on missappropations of funds and now understands all allegation of missappropations of funds must be reported to administration immediately after discovery. On 04/29/2025 at 1:36 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7ADON. S7ADON confirmed S8CNA reported the aforementioned incident to her on 03/29/2025. S7ADON stated she notified S2DON on 03/31/2025 of the incident. She stated she was unaware she should have reported the incident immediately. S7ADON stated she attended an in-service related to reporting any allegations of missappropations of funds and now understands all allegations should be reported to administration immediately after discovery. On 04/30/2025 at 1:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON stated he was notified by the S7ADON on 03/31/2025 of the incident involving Resident #46 giving money to S9CNA. He stated he notified S1ADM by phone on 04/01/2025. S2DON stated all allegations of missappropations of funds should be reported to administration immediately after discovery. On 04/30/2025 at 1:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM confirmed the misappropriation funds was discovered on 03/28/2025 by S8CNA. S1ADM confirmed he was not notified of the incident until 04/01/2025. S1ADM confirmed S7ADON should have notified him immediately when she was made aware on 03/29/2025 and did not. S1ADM stated he was responsible for filing facility self-reported incident reports with the stated agency. He further confirmed a facility self-reported incident report should have been filed when the incident was discovered and was not. S1ADM stated all staff have been in-serviced on reporting incidents of missappropations of funds immediately to their supervisors and or to himself. Throughout the survey from 04/28/2025 to 04/30/2025, observations, record review, and staff interviews revealed staff received training on the facility's misappropriation of funds and reporting policies and procedures. Interviews revealed staff were knowledgeable of the types of exploitation, and were aware to report these incidents to administration immediately. The facility had implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: One resident was affected by this practice. There is no evidence through our investment through our interviews and investigation that this occurred to any other resident. Corrective actions and measures that have been put into place. 1. Our immediate actions were that law-enforcement was contacted, all residents were interviewed to make sure that this has not happened to anyone else in parentheses it has not parentheses. All staff was in serviced on this issue. Ombudsman was notified. Resident physician was notified. Facilities psychiatrist mental health nurse practitioner was notified and has seen the resident. The CNA registry has been notified. Social services here at the facility has been communicating with the resident to make sure she was okay emotionally and mentally. A resident council meeting was held and led by S1ADM. We went over our policy on abuse and specified, especially financial abuse. 2. Our plan of correction started on 04/02/2025 with contacting law-enforcement, opening a facility self-reported incident report, interview, interviews, and in servicing. All staff have been in-serviced on misappropriation of funds/exploitation. All residents have been interviewed and our plan of correction stop date was 04/09/2025 once we completed our corrective action plans. The facility's self-reported incident report was closed on 04/09/2025. 3. The end date for our plan of correction was 04/09/2025. We will continue to in-service, education, train and evaluate during our QA process moving forward. A part of our QA process will be for four consecutive weeks starting Monday 04/14/2025, we will do three random interviews a week to make sure no other resident have been exploited financially. We will also do three random tests a week for four consecutive weeks on staff regarding reporting any potential abuse. The facility will review these interviews and test in our next QA meeting.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's stat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#39) of 3 (#39, #54, and #71) residents reviewed for hospice care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39 was coded correctly for hospice care. Findings: Review of Resident #39's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease. Review of Resident #39's Physician Orders revealed in part, the following: Admit to Hospice, active 12/19/2024. Review of Resident #39's quarterly MDS assessment with ARD of 03/25/2025 revealed in Section O0110.K1. Hospice care: While a resident: Blank. An interview was conducted on 04/30/2025 at 9:45 a.m. with S4MDS. She reviewed Resident #39's MDS assessment dated [DATE]. She confirmed the quarterly MDS assessment was not coded correctly for Hospice and should have been. An interview was conducted on 04/30/2025 at 9:55 a.m. with S2DON. He reviewed Resident #39's MDS assessment dated [DATE]. He confirmed the quarterly MDS assessment was not coded correctly for Hospice and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was revised by failing to update ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was revised by failing to update advance directive code status for 1 (#71) of 24 residents reviewed for code status in the initial sample. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Resident Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives, revealed in part, the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate advance directives. 8. Decisions regarding advance directives and treatment will be periodically reviewed as part of the comprehensive care planning process, the existing care instructions and whether the resident wishes to change or continue these instructions. Review of Resident #71's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Dementia, Metabolic Encephalopathy and Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. Review of Resident #71's Physician Order's revealed he was admitted to Hospice services on 01/28/2025 with a change in advance directive on 03/06/2025 to reflect Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) code status. Review of Resident #71's clinical record documentation titled Louisiana Physician Order for Scope of Treatment, revealed a DNR code status was initiated on 01/28/2025. Review of Resident #71's Care Plan revealed it was not revised to reflect the change in code status and revealed a code status of Full Code. On 04/30/2025 at 12:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4CUC. She confirmed Resident #71 was a DNR Code status in the event of an emergency. S4CUC reviewed Resident #71's care plan and confirmed it was not revised to reflect Resident #71 end of life wishes prior to the survey team entry and should have been. On 04/30/2025 at 12:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. He reviewed Resident #71's care plan and confirmed it was not revised to reflect Resident #71 end of life wishes prior to the survey team entry and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 2 (#17 and #52) of 3 (#17, #52, and #71) residents observed for wound care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy with revision date of 2010 and titled: Clean Dressing Change Policy and Guidelines revealed the following, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease the potential for infection and/or cross-contamination. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 11. Wash hand and put on clean gloves. 12. Cleanse the wound as ordered, taking care to not contaminate other skin surfaces or other surfaces of wound. Pat dry with gauze. 13. Remove gloves and wash hands. 14. Wash hands and put on clean gloves. 15. Apply topical ointments or creams and dress the wound as ordered. Resident #17 Review of Resident #17's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included the following: Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 2 On 04/29/2025 at 2:12 p.m. an observation was made of S5RN with the assistance of S6RN preforming wound care to Resident #17's sacrum. S5RN performed hand hygiene and donned gloves. S5RN removed the dirty dressing and took pictures of the wounds. S5RN then removed her gloves placed them in a red bag, applied a clean pair of gloves, without preforming hand hygiene. Then, S5RN cleaned the wounds with wound cleanser and without removing the soiled gloves, she applied collagen and a clean foam dressing. Resident #52 Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #52's diagnoses included the following: Pressure Ulcer of Left Ankle, Stage 3, Pressure Ulcer of Other Site Stage 3. On 04/29/25 02:26 p.m., an observation was made of S5RN with the assistance of S6RN performing wound care for Resident #52. S5RN preformed hand hygiene and donned gloves. S5RN removed the dirty dressing and placed in a red bag. S5RN took pictures of the wound, removed her gloves and placed the soiled gloves in a red bag. S5RN then donned a clean pair of gloves without preforming hand hygiene, cleaned the wound with wound cleanser, without removing her soiled gloves or preforming hand hygiene, she applied ointment and a clean dressing. On 04/29/2025 at 2:52 p.m., an interview was a conducted with S5RN. S5RN confirmed after she removed Resident # 17's and Resident #52's soiled wound dressings, she did not perform hand hygiene prior to applying clean gloves and cleansing their wounds. S5RN further confirmed she did not change gloves or preform hand hygiene prior to applying medications and bandages to the cleaned wounds. On 04/30/2025 at 10:00 a.m. an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON stated the process for wound care was to change gloves and perform hand hygiene after removing a soiled dressing, after cleaning a wound and prior to applying medications and a clean dressing to the wound. S2DON confirmed S5RN should have followed this process and did not.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure food was proper...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure food was properly labeled, sealed, and dated in the refrigerator and dry storage area of the facility's kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 90 residents who were served food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated. On 04/28/2025 at 8:10 a.m., an initial tour was made of the kitchen with S3DS. The observations were made of the following items: Refrigerator: 1 one gallon clear bag containing three pieces of cornbread unsealed, 1 medium turkey breast wrapped in clear wrapping with no label or date, 1 clear plastic bag containing diced turkey pieces, half full, with no label or date; and 1 clear plastic bag containing churros, half full, with no label or date. Dry Storage: 1 party sized bag of buttermilk pancake mix, which had been opened, with no label or date. On 04/28/2025 at 8:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DS. She confirmed the above items were not labeled or dated and should have been. She confirmed the bag of cornbread was not sealed and should have been. On 04/28/2025 at 3:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He was made aware of the above findings in the kitchen. He confirmed food should be sealed, dated, and labeled.
May 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#4) of 2 (#4 and #51) residents reviewed for wound care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Documentation in Medical Record, with a Copyright date of 2024, revealed the following, in part: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team members shall document all assessments, observations, and services provided in the resident's medical record in accordance with state law and facility policy. 2. Documentation shall be completed at the time of service, but no later than the shift in which the assessment, observation, or care service occurred. 4. Principles of documentation include, but are not limited to: b. Documentation shall be accurate, relevant, and complete, containing sufficient details about the resident's care and/or responses to care. c. Documentation shall be timely and in chronological order. Review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Pressure Ulcer of Other Site, Stage 3 and Functional Quadriplegia. Review of Resident #4's current Physician Orders revealed in part, the following: 01/13/2022-Cleanse suprapubic cath site with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Calcium Alginate and foam over reddened area and apply foam adhesive dressing over both, daily and as needed for soiling. 02/17/2022-Suprapubic catheter care every day. 03/06/2022-Irrigate Foley daily with 120 mLs of sterile water. 07/01/2022-Ampicillin 500 mg mix with 1liter of normal saline. Drain bladder. Instill 60 mL into bladder, plug catheter for 30 minutes. Drain bladder. Perform 3 times a week, one time a day every Mon, Wed, Fri. Review of Resident #4's March 2024-April 2024 TARs revealed wound care, catheter care, and irrigation of Foley was not documented on the following days: 03/05/2024, 03/20/2024, 03/30/2024, 04/22/2024, 04/24/2024, 04/27/2024, and 04/30/2024. Review of Resident #4's March 2024-April 2024 TARs revealed Ampicillin administration was not documented on 03/20/2024, 04/22/2024, and 04/24/2024. An interview was conducted on 05/22/2024 at 10:13 a.m. with S5WCN. S5WCN reviewed Resident #4's March 2024-April 2024 TARs. S5WCN confirmed there was no documentation of wound care, catheter care, and irrigation of Foley on the following days: 03/05/2024, 03/20/2024, 03/30/2024, 04/22/2024, 04/24/2024, 04/27/2024 and 04/30/2024. S5WCN confirmed there was no documentation of Ampicillin administration on 03/20/2024, 04/22/2024, and 04/24/2024. S5WCN stated these tasks were performed as ordered for Resident #4, however were not documented and should have been. An interview was conducted on 05/22/2024 at 1:45 p.m. with S2DON. S2DON reviewed Resident #4's March 2024-April 2024 TARs S2DON confirmed Resident #4 did not have accurate and complete documentation for wound care, Foley catheter irrigation, suprapubic catheter care, and Ampicillin administration and should have.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. The facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene and cleaning techniques during incontinence care for 1 (#13) of 3 (#13, #71, and #90) residents reviewed for incontinent care. Finding: Review of the facility's policy labeled, Perineal Care with no revision date, reviewed on 05/22/2024 revealed the following: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 6. Perform hand hygiene and put on gloves. Apply other personal protective equipment as appropriate. a. Cleanse buttocks and anus, front to back, vagina to anus in female, then using a separate washcloth or wipes. b. Thoroughly dry. 10. Re-position resident in supine position. Change gloves if soiled and continue with perineal care. 16. Remove gloves and discard. Perform hand hygiene. Review of the facility's policy labeled, Hand Hygiene with no revision date, reviewed on 05/22/2024 revealed the following: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice. Review of Resident #13's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 05/21/2024 at 12:50 p.m., an observation was made of S3CNA and S4CNA performing peri-care on Resident #13. With clean gloves, S3CNA unfastened Resident #13's stool soiled brief, turned the resident to her right side, and wiped the resident's sacrum removing the stool. Then without removing soiled gloves or performing hand hygiene, S3CNA grabbed the new clean brief and assisted the resident to turn on her left side. S4CNA then removed the stool soiled brief, and wiped Resident #13's peri-area clean. Then without removing soiled gloves or performing hand hygiene, S4CNA secured the new brief on Resident #13. S3CNA touched resident to reposition her, applied covers to resident, and adjusted Resident #13's pillow. S4CNA used Resident #13's remote to adjust her head of bed with the same soiled gloves used during peri-care. S3CNA and S4CNA then removed their gloves, preformed hand hygiene, and exited the room. On 05/21/2024 at 12:56 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3CNA. S3CNA confirmed she did not remove her soiled gloves or perform hand hygiene during the above observation. She stated she should have removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene after removing the soiled brief, cleaning the stool from Resident #13's sacrum, and before touching the resident or his/her belongings. On 05/21/2024 at 12:59 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4CNA. S4CNA confirmed she did not remove her soiled gloves or perform hand hygiene during the above observation. She stated she should have removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene after removing the soiled brief and before applying the new one. She stated she should not have touched the resident's remote to adjust the head of the bed with the soiled gloves. On 05/21/2024 at 3:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. He stated staff should perform hang hygiene and apply clean gloves upon entering a resident's room, when going from soiled to clean during incontinence care, after completing incontinence care, and prior to exiting the resident's room. S2DON confirmed staff were trained to perform hand hygiene correctly and should have done so during peri-care.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0577 (Tag F0577)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all complaint surveys since the last annual survey were available for resident review. Findings: An observation was ma...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all complaint surveys since the last annual survey were available for resident review. Findings: An observation was made on 05/20/2024 at 9:07 a.m. of the facility's binder Survey results located near the entrance of the facility. Review of the survey results binder revealed the last survey posted in the binder was dated 05/05/2023. Further review revealed no documented evidence of the survey results from complaint surveys dated 07/12/2023, 03/20/2024, and 05/13/2024 having been available for review. An interview was conducted on 05/20/2024 at 9:40 a.m. with S1ADM. He reviewed the facility's binder Survey results. He confirmed the only survey results located in the binder was the survey dated 05/05/2023. He confirmed the complaint surveys since the annual recertification survey should have been in the binder.
Mar 2024 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (H) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from psycho...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from psychosocial harm by Resident #3 for 4 (#1, #R4, #R5, and #R7) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in an actual psychosocial harm on the morning of 02/24/2024 when Resident #3, a cognitively intact resident, was observed kissing Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident, on the cheek. Resident #3's nonconsensual inappropriate sexual advances and psychosocial harm continued for Resident #1. As a result of the investigation, despite there not being a significant decline in mental or physical functioning for Resident #1, it could be determined the reasonable person would have experienced severe psychosocial harm as a result of the sexual abuse, since a reasonable person would not expect to be treated in this manner in their own home or a health care facility. Interviews with Random Resident #4, Random Resident #5, and Random Resident #7 revealed they were afraid of residing in the facility with Resident #3 due to his inappropriate sexual behaviors. Further interview with Random Resident #7 revealed she was sleeping with a walking stick at night in case she needed to defend herself from Resident #3. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revealed the following in part: 1. The facility will . : a. Prohibit and prevent abuse .of residents. 3. The facility will provide ongoing oversight and supervision of staff in order to assure that its policies are implemented as written. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Vascular Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Expressive Language Disorder, and Altered Mental Status. Review of Resident #1's MDS with an ARD of 02/20/2024 revealed a BIMS of 4, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Depression. Review of Resident #3's MDS with an ARD of 02/20/2024 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's current Care Plan undated revealed the following in part Focus: Potential for Altered Mood Behaviors r/t Depression. Focus: Exhibits Inappropriate Behaviors at times. Review of #R5's Annual MDS with an ARD of 02/29/2024 revealed, in part, a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. On 03/14/2024 at 4:14 p.m., an interview was conducted with #R5. She stated Resident #1 was being sexually harassed by Resident #3. She stated Resident #1 had a childlike mentality, and could not speak. She stated on 02/23/2024 she saw Resident #3 leading Resident #1 down Hall A in the direction of Resident #3's room, arm in arm. She stated Resident #1 did not reside on Hall A. She stated she alerted S10LPN, who then brought Resident #1 to the dining area. She stated on 02/24/2024 Resident #3 put his arm around Resident #1 and kissed her on the cheek. She stated S2DON was present and saw what happened. She stated S2DON escorted Resident #3 back to his room. She stated on 02/25/2024 Resident #3 put his arm around Resident #1 and tried to kiss her. She stated a CNA, who she couldn't identify stopped him and brought Resident #3 to his room. She further stated on 02/28/2024 during activities, Resident #3 began calling Resident #1's name over and over again loudly. She stated when the activities director asked if everyone wanted to watch a movie, Resident #3 asked, Do you have any porn? She stated she did not feel safe living in the facility with Resident #3. She stated she was afraid to have her grandchildren visit because of his sexually inappropriate behaviors. She stated she kept a notebook with documentation of the incidents that happened involving Resident #1. She stated she did not feel safe living in the facility with Resident #3. On 03/19//2024 at 10:50 a.m. an interview was conducted with S8LPN. She stated on 03/01/2024, she witnessed Resident #3 blow kisses to Resident #1 and rub Resident #1's back. She stated on that same date, she witnessed Resident #3 approach Resident #1 and he was staring at her. She stated she asked Resident #3 to leave. She stated this incident made her feel very uncomfortable, so she notified the S2DON. She stated S2DON assured her the Administrator was aware of the situation. On 03/18/2024 at 1:01 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #3's Responsible Party. He stated S1ADM informed him Resident #3 kissed Resident #1 on the forehead, but he could not recall the date. He stated S1ADM stated Resident #3 was told he could not kiss women in the facility. He stated he spoke to Resident #3 about kissing Resident #1, and Resident #3 didn't think it was wrong. He stated Resident #3 was aware of right and wrong, and confirmed he was cognitively intact. On 03/18/2024 at 1:36 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #3. He stated he kissed female residents on the hand, and he kissed a lot of them. He stated now he only kisses Resident #1 because she was the prettiest and she liked it. He stated he knew she liked him, because he sat in the dining room and stared at Resident #1 for 6 hours and she only smiled at him, and no one else. He stated he kissed Resident #1 on the forehead. He stated S1ADM told him he could not kiss Resident #1. He stated he kissed Resident #1 and was going to continue to kiss her, even though S1ADM asked him not to. On 03/18/2024 at 1:56 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He said Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired and resident #3 was cognitively intact. He confirmed knowing some resident's in the facility had complained to staff about Resident #3 exhibiting sexually inappropriate behaviors. He stated he was aware Resident #3 allegedly kissed Resident #1. He confirmed being told Resident #3 made a joke to another female resident in reference to Resident #1 stating, You should have seen what we did last night. He stated other residents were exaggerating Resident #3's behaviors, and he did not believe Resident #3 kissed Resident #1. On 03/18/2024 at 2:27 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3MDS. She stated staff were asked to keep Resident #3 away from Resident #1 because he was kissing Resident #1. She confirmed Resident #3 was cognitively intact and Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. On 03/19/2024 at 9:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5RN. She stated the last meeting she attended was 03/06/2024. She stated staff discussed inappropriate verbal behaviors regarding Resident #3. She stated she was aware Resident #3 had kissed Resident #1 on the forehead. She stated Resident #3 had asked her once to call a prostitute for him. She stated Resident #3 had requested multiple times to only have a female staff to shower him. She stated Resident #3 was aware that Resident #1 had a childlike mind. She stated the Administrator talked to him about this with Resident #3 and she witnessed the conversation. She stated Resident #3 continued with inappropriate comments. She stated because of his comments there was a group of ladies in the dining area who were uncomfortable with him around them. On 03/19/2024 at 9:47 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9A. She stated staff had to watch Resident #1 constantly to assure she was safe from Resident #3. S9A stated Resident #3 walked up quietly behind her and startled her. She stated Resident #3 made her (S9A) feel uncomfortable and uneasy and she did not feel safe with him here at the facility. She stated she attended weekly meetings on Wednesdays with all department heads. She stated in the meetings Resident #3's sexually inappropriate behaviors, were discussed with staff. She stated staff had increased supervision on Resident #3. She stated Resident #1 had a childlike mind. On 03/19/2024 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON stated, on 02/24/2024, #R5 and other female residents told him Resident #3 kissed Resident #1. He stated he did not witness the kiss, so he didn't think it happened. He confirmed Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired and nonverbal. He confirmed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Review of #R4's Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 01/05/2024 revealed, in part, a BIMS of 10, which indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired. On 03/19/2024 at 11:16 a.m. an interview was conducted with #R4. She stated she witnessed Resident #3 kiss Resident #1 three times on the head. She stated she said to him, You know you are not supposed to be anywhere near her! She stated Resident #3 told her, in reference to Resident #1, You should have seen what we done last night. She stated Resident #3 made hip gestures in a sexual manner, and said, Making hot love. She stated she was concerned about his inappropriate behavior. She stated a staff member took her to see the Administrator and they told him. She stated this occurred about 3 weeks ago. She stated she was afraid to live in the facility with Resident #3 there. On 03/19/2024 at 1:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S10LPN. She stated on 02/23/2024, residents seated in the dining room were tapping on the window and pointing toward Resident #1 and Resident #3 walking together. She stated she walked down Hall A, and saw Resident #1 and Resident #3 walking towards Resident #3's room with their arms locked together. She stated she redirected Resident #1 and separated the residents. She stated she told Resident #3, You know you can't take her walking anywhere. She doesn't know what she is doing. She confirmed Resident #3 was oriented and knew right from wrong. She confirmed reporting the incident to S2DON. She stated since the incident on 02/23/2024, staff increased supervision of Resident #1 and Resident #3. She stated supervision was not 1:1, but staff monitored both residents more closely. On 03/20/2024 at 9:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1's RP. The RP said Resident #1 was not capable of knowing if she was being sexually abused. Resident #1's RP stated Resident #1 would not want a male she did not know holding arms with her or kissing her anywhere. She confirmed Resident #1 had the mind of a child and can't speak up for herself. Review of #R7's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/06/2024 revealed, in part, a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. On 03/20/2024 at 12:50 p.m. an interview was conducted with #R7. She stated Resident #3 snuck up behind her and startled her. She stated his face was almost touching hers and he whispered in her ear, Hello sweetheart. She stated she told him to stay away from her, and she put up her hand up by his face. She stated she saw Resident #3 petting Resident #1's hand and then he kissed Resident #1 on the face, and she told Resident #3 to stay away from her. She stated he replied, Shut up you old mean B****! She stated she kept a walking stick by her bedside at night to defend herself from Resident #3. She stated she was afraid living in the facility while he is there. She stated S1ADM talked with her about the incident. She stated S1ADM told her Resident was a nice man who lost his wife and son, and he didn't mean what he said.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported immediately, to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported immediately, to the facility Administrator and to the State Survey Agency for 1 (#1) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) residents sampled for abuse. Findings: Review of the Policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation undated, revealed the following in part: VII. Reporting/Response: A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of abuse to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies . a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse . Review of the facility's self-reported incidents from February 2024 through 03/18/2024 revealed: No reports completed for Resident #3. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Expressive Language Disorder, Vascular Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, Anxiety, and Major Depressive Disorder. Resident #1's MDS with an ARD of 01/23/2024 revealed she had a BIMS of 4, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Depression. Further review of Resident #3's MDS with an ARD of 02/20/2024 revealed he had a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. On 03/19/2024 at 11:16 a.m. an interview was conducted with #R4. She stated Resident #3 told her, in reference to Resident #1, You should have seen what we done last night. She stated Resident #3 made hip gestures in a sexual manner, and said, Making hot love. She stated a staff member took her to see the Administrator and they told him. She stated this occurred about 3 weeks ago. On 03/19/2024 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. He stated on 02/24/2024, another resident informed him Resident #3 kissed Resident #1. He confirmed he did not report the incident because he did not witness the incident. On 03/18/2024 at 1:56 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He confirmed he was responsible for reporting alleged abuse to the state agency. He confirmed is was aware Resident #3 allegedly kissed Resident #1, who had a childlike mentality and was nonverbal. He confirmed he was aware of Resident #3's statements regarding Resident #1 You should have seen what we did last night. He confirmed he had not reported the allegations of sexual abuse.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident of resident to resident sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (#3) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident of resident to resident sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (#3) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the undated facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, revealed, in part: V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation A. An immediate investigation is warranted when abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Abuse coordinator is responsible for making this determination. B. Written procedures for investigations include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigations; 2. Exercising caution in handling evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation. 3. Investigation different types of alleged violations; 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations. 5. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and cause; ad 6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. Review of the facility's self-reported incidents from February 2024 through 03/18/2024 revealed: No reports completed for Resident #3. Review of the facility's investigation documentation for Resident #3 revealed no documentation an investigation was completed. On 03/19/2024 at 11:16 a.m. an interview was conducted with #R4. She stated Resident #3 told her, in reference to Resident #1, You should have seen what we done last night. She stated Resident #3 made hip gestures in a sexual manner, and said, Making hot love. She stated a staff member took her to see the Administrator and they told him. She stated this occurred about 3 weeks ago. On 03/19/2024 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON confirmed on 02/24/2024 other residents in the facility brought Resident #3's sexually inapproprate behaviors to his attention. He stated on 02/24/2024, a resident informed him Resident #3 kissed Resident #1. He confirmed he did not report or investigate the incident because he did not witness the incident. He stated he did not witness the incident, so he felt it did not happen. S2DON stated he did not see any reason to start an investigation. On 03/18/2024 at 1:56 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He confirmed knowing some resident's in the facility had complained to staff about Resident #3 exhibiting sexually inappropriate behaviors in the facility. He stated he was aware Resident #3 allegedly kissed Resident #1. He confirmed being told Resident #3 made a joke to another female resident in reference to Resident #1 stating, You should have seen what we did last night. He stated other residents were exaggerating Resident #3's behaviors, and he did not believe Resident #3 kissed Resident #1. He stated he did not investigate the allegations because he did not believe there was a need to.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for 1 (#3) of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for 1 (#3) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) residents reviewed in the final sample. Findings: Review of Resident #3's medical records revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #3's current care plan revealed he exhibited inappropriate behaviors at times. Further review revealed there was no documentation specifying what type of inappropriate behaviors exhibited or documentation of interventions for Resident #3. On 03/18/2024 at 2:27 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3MDS. She stated during their weekly staff meeting, there was discussion regarding Resident #3's behaviors on 03/06/2024. She stated staff presented concerns regarding Resident #3 taunting and blowing kisses at female residents. S3MDS stated she added inappropriate behaviors at times to his care plan at that time. S3MDS confirmed she did not list what type of inappropriate behaviors he exhibited and she did not list any interventions discussed in the meeting which included increased supervision for Resident #3 and she should have. On 03/19/2024 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON confirmed Resident #3's care plan should have been updated to accurately reflect specific behaviors exhibited and appropriate interventions which included increased supervision as previously discussed in staff meeting and did not.
Mar 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of verbal and physical abuse were report...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of verbal and physical abuse were reported immediately to the Administrator and within 2 hours after the allegations were made to the state survey agency for 1(#46) of 32 residents reviewed in the initial pool. Findings: A review of the facility's Abuse-Prevention and Prohibition Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. VII. Reporting/ Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of abuse to the administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury Resident #46 A review of Resident #46's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility's investigations reported to the state survey agency from March 2022 through March 2023 revealed none for Resident #46. On 03/21/2023 at 3:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #46. He stated S4CNA made him feel threatened and rough housed him by slamming his legs against the wall while turning him. He stated S4CNA threatened him with a closed fist. He stated he was unsure what provoked her to do so. He stated she did not hit him, but made him think she would. He stated she told him no one loved him, not even God. He stated she scared him and he felt intimidated by her actions. He stated this occurred 3 to 4 months ago, and he reported it to S2DON. On 03/21/2023 at 3:16 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. He stated Resident #46 made frequent allegations against staff reporting they were rough with him. He stated the last allegation he was made aware of occurred last week. He stated Resident #46 accused a CNA of throwing him against the wall. S2DON denied knowing of any allegations of verbal abuse allegations. S2DON stated he looked into the allegation but further investigation was not warranted. He stated he did not have documentation to support an investigation was conducted into the allegation of abuse last week. He stated S1ADM was responsible for conducting investigations into alleged abuse. He explained if the facility opened an internal investigation report every time Resident #46 made allegations of abuse, he would have a stack of papers on his desk and be unable to carry out his day to day work. He confirmed any allegations of abuse should be immediately reported to S1ADM. He confirmed he had not reported any allegations of abuse to S1ADM related to Resident #46. He stated he did not feel past allegations made by Resident #46 required further investigation. On 03/23/2023 at 10:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He confirmed he did not know Resident #46 had made allegations of verbal and/or physical abuse against staff. He confirmed there was no documentation on previous allegations of abuse made by Resident #46. He confirmed if allegations were made that a resident was thrown against the wall by any staff member he would consider this as a type of physical abuse and warrant further investigation. He confirmed upon suspicion or reports of abuse he would immediately follow facility policy and regulatory requirements and report the allegation to the state survey agency. He confirmed the facility did not report Resident #46's allegations of abuse to the state survey agency.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that an alleged violation of abuse was thoroughly in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that an alleged violation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (#46) of 20 residents investigated in the final sample for abuse out of a total of 32 residents reviewed for abuse in the initial pool. Findings: A review of the facility's Abuse-Prevention and Prohibition Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Abuse coordinator is responsible for this making this determination. VI. Protection of Resident The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm, as well as additional abuse, during and after the investigation. Examples include but are not limited to: A.Responding immediately to protect the alleged victim and integrity of the investigation D. Room or staffing changes, if necessary, to protect the resident(s) from the alleged perpetrator Resident #46 A review of Resident #46's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction, Vascular Dementia, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Unspecified Psychosis, and Contracture to Left Knee and Left Hand. Review of the facility's investigations reported to the state survey agency revealed none for Resident #46. On 03/21/2023 at 3:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #46. He stated S4CNA made him feel threatened, and she rough housed him by slamming his legs against the wall while turning him. He stated S4CNA threatened him with a closed fist. He stated he was unsure what provoked her to do so. He stated she did not hit him, but she made him think she would. He stated S4CNA made comments no one loved him, not even God. He stated she scared him and he felt intimidated by her actions. He stated this occurred 3 to 4 months ago. He stated he reported it to S2DON. On 03/21/2023 at 3:16 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. He stated Resident #46 made weekly allegations of abuse. He stated the last allegation he was made aware of occurred last week when Resident #46 accused a CNA of throwing him against the wall. He stated there was no documentation an investigation was conducted related to the allegation. He stated S1ADM was responsible for investigating all allegations of abuse. He stated if the facility opened an internal investigation report every time Resident #46 made allegations of abuse he would have a stack of papers on his desk and be unable to carry out his day to day work. On 03/23/2023 at 09:47 a.m. an interview was conducted with S2DON. He confirmed any allegations of abuse should be immediately reported to S1ADM. He confirmed he had not reported any allegations of abuse to S1ADM related to Resident #46. He stated he did not feel past allegations made by Resident #46 required further investigation. On 03/23/2023 at 10:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He confirmed there was no abuse allegations reported to him regarding Resident #46. He confirmed if allegations were made that a resident was thrown against the wall by any staff member he would consider this physical abuse and warrant further investigation. He confirmed upon suspicion or reports of abuse he would immediately follow facility policy and regulatory requirements and report the allegation to the state survey agency. He confirmed there were no open internal investigation reports at this time.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were maintained in a safe manner in a locked compartment for 1 (MCa) of 3 (MCa, MCb, and MCc) medicine car...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were maintained in a safe manner in a locked compartment for 1 (MCa) of 3 (MCa, MCb, and MCc) medicine carts reviewed. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Administering Medications revealed, in part: 10. During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. It may be kept in the doorway of the resident's room, with open drawers facing inward and all other sides closed. On 03/21/2023 at 8:15 a.m., S3LPN was observed coming out of a resident's room on the right side of hall a. MCa was unlocked and unattended on the left side of hall a. On 03/21/2023 at 8:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3LPN. She confirmed her medication cart was unlocked when she was in the resident's room and should have been locked. On 03/22/2023 at 12:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. He was made aware of MCa being unlocked while S3LPN was in a resident's room. He confirmed all medication carts should be locked when not in view of the nurse.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 harm violation(s), $133,030 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 16 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $133,030 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (15/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is The Lodge At Tangi Pines's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns The Lodge at Tangi Pines an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is The Lodge At Tangi Pines Staffed?

CMS rates The Lodge at Tangi Pines's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at The Lodge At Tangi Pines?

State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at The Lodge at Tangi Pines during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 13 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates The Lodge At Tangi Pines?

The Lodge at Tangi Pines is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 100 certified beds and approximately 94 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Amite, Louisiana.

How Does The Lodge At Tangi Pines Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, The Lodge at Tangi Pines's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Lodge At Tangi Pines?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.

Is The Lodge At Tangi Pines Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, The Lodge at Tangi Pines has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at The Lodge At Tangi Pines Stick Around?

The Lodge at Tangi Pines has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was The Lodge At Tangi Pines Ever Fined?

The Lodge at Tangi Pines has been fined $133,030 across 2 penalty actions. This is 3.9x the Louisiana average of $34,409. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is The Lodge At Tangi Pines on Any Federal Watch List?

The Lodge at Tangi Pines is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.