JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC

9919 JEFFERSON HWY., BATON ROUGE, LA 70809 (225) 293-1434
For profit - Limited Liability company 122 Beds CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY Data: November 2025 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#213 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Jefferson Manor Nursing and Rehab Center, LLC has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. In the state of Louisiana, it ranks #213 out of 264 facilities, placing it in the bottom half, and #20 out of 25 in East Baton Rouge County, meaning there are only a few local options that perform better. The facility is showing signs of improvement, with the number of reported issues decreasing from 15 in 2024 to 12 in 2025. Staffing received a middle rating of 3 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 44%, slightly below the state average, which suggests that some staff remain long enough to build relationships with residents. However, the facility has accrued concerning fines totaling $164,576, which is higher than 88% of Louisiana facilities, signaling potential compliance issues. Specific incidents raised serious alarms, including a failure to respond to call lights for residents on Hall A for several hours, leading to a resident's tragic death after being discovered unresponsive on the floor. Additionally, another resident was able to elope from the facility due to inadequate supervision, raising significant safety concerns. While there are some positive aspects, such as an average level of RN coverage, the serious issues identified in the inspection findings warrant careful consideration for families looking into this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Louisiana
#213/264
Bottom 20%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
15 → 12 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
44% turnover. Near Louisiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$164,576 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 16 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
38 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 15 issues
2025: 12 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (44%)

    4 points below Louisiana average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Louisiana average (2.4)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 44%

Near Louisiana avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $164,576

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 38 deficiencies on record

4 life-threatening
Sept 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 (#1) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, R7, R8, and R9) residents reviewed for environment. Find...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 (#1) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, R7, R8, and R9) residents reviewed for environment. Findings:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Resident Rights, revealed the following, in part: (h) Environment. The facility must provide-(1) A safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.(2) Housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 04/20/2023. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 06/18/2025 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact.On 09/03/2025 at 12:25 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. He stated he was not pleased with the conditions of his room. He stated since pest control last sprayed his room, approximately 2-3 weeks ago, dead bugs, specifically roaches, could be seen throughout his room. He stated housekeeping did not clean his room effectively. He stated they came each day to mop and sweep, but his room remained dirty. He stated, it makes me feel gross. On 09/03/2025 at 12:34 p.m., an observation of Resident #1's room was conducted and revealed the presence of 8, small (under 1/2 inch), dead roaches along the baseboards of the room, next to the fridge, in front and on the side of Resident #1's wardrobe, under the A/C unit, and next to Resident #1's laundry basket.On 09/03/2025 at 12:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3HOU. She stated each room was swept and mopped each morning, with touch-up cleanings performed after lunch. On 09/03/2025 at 12:57 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4HOU. She confirmed the daily cleaning of Resident #1's room had been completed. On 09/03/2025 at 1:00 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #1's room with S3HOU. She confirmed the aforementioned observations and stated Resident #1's room was not cleaned thoroughly and should have been. On 09/03/2025 at 1:03 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #1's room with S2CORP. He confirmed the room was not cleaned thoroughly and should have been.On 09/03/2025 at 1:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He was made aware of the aforementioned observations. He stated he expected all rooms to be cleaned thoroughly by housekeeping staff.
May 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

MDS Data Transmission (Tag F0640)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and trans...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and transmitted timely for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for resident assessment. Findings: Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 05/20/2025, review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/01/2025 revealed the MDS assessment was incomplete and had a status of: in progress. On 05/20/2025 at 11:44 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3MDS. She stated she was responsible for completing Resident #2's MDS assessments. She reviewed the above-mentioned MDS and confirmed it was not completed within the required 14 days after the ARD date, and had not been transmitted. On 05/21/2025 at 11:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. She reviewed the above-mentioned MDS and confirmed it was not completed within the required 14 days after the ARD date, and had not been transmitted.
MINOR (C) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure nurse staffing data requirements were documented on daily postings, and 2. Ensure nurse staffing data was posted ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure nurse staffing data requirements were documented on daily postings, and 2. Ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 97 residents residing in the facility. Findings: An observation was made on 05/19/2025 at 3:42 p.m. of the posted staffing data sheet dated 05/04/2025. Further review revealed no documentation of the facility name. An interview was conducted on 05/19/2025 at 3:42 p.m. with S1DON. She confirmed the date on the staffing data sheet was dated 05/04/2025. She stated S2WC was responsible for posting the staffing data sheets daily and 05/19/2025 should be posted. She confirmed the facility's name was not documented on the staffing data sheet and should have been. An interview was conducted on 05/20/2025 at 1:55 p.m. with S2WC. She stated she was responsible for completing and posting the staffing data sheets daily. She confirmed she had not posted the staffing data sheet since 05/04/2025 and should have. She confirmed the facility's name was not documented on the staffing data sheet. She stated she was unaware the facility's name was a requirement on the staffing data sheet.
Mar 2025 3 deficiencies 1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to be free from neg...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to be free from neglect for all residents who resided on Hall A (Rooms 1-30). Nursing staff neglected to respond to call lights and provide any care and services to all resident's residing on Hall A from 11:00 p.m. to 2:30 a.m. on the night of [DATE]. As a result of the identified noncompliance, serious harm, serious impairment, death, or psychosocial harm was likely to occur to the residents residing on Hall A. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on [DATE] at approximately 11:00 p.m. when Resident #1, who had a physician's order for staff to visually check the resident every 2 hours, activated her call light for staff assistance. No staff responded to her call until approximately 2:39 a.m. when S6CNA found Resident #1 in here room on the floor, kneeling on a fall mat at the bedside, unresponsive and pulseless. Resident #1 expired after unsuccessful CPR was initiated. On [DATE] at approximately 2:53 a.m., S6CNA found Resident #3, who had a physician's order for staff to visually check the resident every 2 hours, lying on the floor. This resulted in psychosocial harm for Resident #3 who verbalized in an angry tone that she felt aggravated and neglected when staff did not help her after she slid out of bed and had to stay on the floor for a long time. Interviews with staff revealed the last time staff visualized or provided care for any residents residing on Hall A on [DATE] was at 10:00 p.m.; and not again until 2:30 a.m. on [DATE]. S2ADM was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 7:02 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE] at 1:31 p.m., as confirmed by onsite verification through record reviews and interviews. The facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal (POR) prior to survey exit. This deficient practice continued at a potential for more than minimal harm to the remaining 100 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse/Neglect Prevention Program with a revision date of [DATE], revealed the following in part: Abuse/Neglect Policy Statement: Each resident also has the right to be free from neglect. 9. Neglect- Failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental or mental illness. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Foot Drop of Right and Left Foot, Repeated Falls, Muscle Weakness (generalized), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Primary Insomnia, Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis, Abnormal Posture, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Need Assistance for Personal Care. Further review revealed Resident #1 resided on Hall A when she expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's most recent completed Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident #1 was dependent on staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #1's [DATE] Physician's Orders revealed an order was implemented on [DATE] for visual checks to be completed by staff every 2 hours for the resident's location. Review of Resident #1's Nurses' Note dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: On [DATE] at 2:42 a.m.: Upon doing rounds, aide walked into room and found Resident #1 unresponsive on fall mat. Nurse was immediately called to the room. Upon entering room, nurse noticed resident on her fall mat in a kneeling position facing the bed. Unable to obtain pulse or blood pressure upon assessment. Initiated CPR immediately. 911 notified. CPR in progress. At 2:53 a.m., fire department arrived and continued CPR. Coroner's office notified, family notified. At 3:43 a.m., attempted to contact physician. At 4:00 a.m., coroner arrived, okay to release the body to funeral home. Signed by: S5LPN. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Muscle Wasting, Muscle Weakness, and Lack of Coordination. Review of Resident #3's most recent completed MDS, with an ARD of [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed she required partial to substantial/max assist with bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #3's [DATE] active Physician's Orders revealed an order was on [DATE] for visual checks to be completed by staff every 2 hours for the resident's location. Review of Resident #3's Nurses Note dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: On [DATE] at 2:53 a.m.: Upon doing rounds, aide found Resident #3 lying down on the floor, nurse was immediately called to the room. Signed by: S5LPN. Review of the CNA Daily Assignment Sheet from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: S7CNA was assigned to care for the residents residing on Hall A Rooms 1-10 S8CNA was assigned to care for the residents residing on Hall A Rooms 11-20 S6CNA was assigned to care for the residents residing on Hall A Rooms 21-30 On [DATE] at 2:04 p.m., a review of the facility's video surveillance footage of Hall A, dated [DATE] from 12:00 a.m. until approximately 4:45 a.m., was conducted with S2ADM. Prior to reviewing the footage, S2ADM stated he did not have access to any surveillance footage prior to [DATE] at 12:00 a.m. The surveillance footage revealed from 12:00 a.m. to approximately 2:35 a.m., staff failed to perform visual checks on Resident #1 and #3 every two hours as ordered, or any other residents on Hall A. The surveillance footage further revealed during that time, staff neglected to provide any care and services to any resident's residing on Hall A, and at 12:35 a.m., a call light was observed to be on in Hall A but S2ADM was unable to identify if it was coming from Resident #1's room or the room next to her. S2ADM confirmed the above review of the facility footage revealed no staff rounded on or provided care to any resident on Hall A from 12:00 a.m., on [DATE] until approximately 2:37 a.m. On [DATE] at 11:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6CNA. She stated she worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift on [DATE] and was assigned to provide care for Resident #1 and Resident #3, as well as the residents in Rooms 21-30 on Hall A. S6CNA stated Resident #1 and #3 required staff assistance to get out of bed. She stated Resident #1 and #3 were ordered to have visual checks every 2 hours, which meant the staff were to visualize the resident every two hours. She stated she typically rounded on her residents every two hours, beginning at 10:00 p.m., then again at 12:00 a.m., 2:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., and 6:00 a.m. She stated CNAs should sit on the halls, in the section they were assigned, so they could respond to call lights and assist residents with needs because there was no ward clerk responsible to answer call lights after 10:00 p.m. She stated S5LPN notified her on [DATE], at the beginning of her shift that staff could not walk on the floor to get to the resident's rooms on Hall A due to floor maintenance. She stated she did not notify administration about not being able to see the residents and no staff monitored or provided care to any of the residents on Hall A from 10:00 p.m. to 2:30 a.m., when the floor maintenance was completed. She stated she sat in the day room across from the nurse's station with another aid waiting until the floors were finished and she could see call lights going off on Hall A. She stated she could not remember which residents needed assistance aside from Resident #1, and stated she did not respond to the call lights. She stated Resident #1's call light was on from approximately 10:00 p.m. to 2:30 a.m. She stated once the floor maintenance was completed at approximately 2:30 a.m., she started rounding on her residents. She stated she went into Resident #1's room first because she knew Resident #1's call light had been on for a while. She confirmed this was the first time during her shift she had visualized her assigned residents. She stated when she entered Resident #1's room she found the resident kneeling on the fall mat beside her bed, arm gripping the bed rail, unresponsive, cold, and pale. She stated she immediately notified S5LPN and left the room once help arrived. She stated she then rounded on Resident #3 and found Resident #3 lying on the floor uninjured. She stated Resident #3 did not say much to her other than she was not hurt and did not want to go to the emergency room. She stated she did not know how long Resident #3 was lying on the floor prior finding. She stated she notified S5LPN. She stated staff not performing visual checks or providing care to the residents on Hall A from 10:00 p.m. until 2:30 a.m., was neglect. She stated she should have performed visual checks and responded to call lights regardless of the floor maintenance and confirmed she had not. She stated she notified S2ADM once he had arrived to the facility, that staff were unable to perform rounds on residents on Hall A. On [DATE] at 3:29 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. S5LPN stated she was assigned to provide care for Resident #1, #3, and all of the residents on Hall A on [DATE] and worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift. She confirmed Resident #1 and #3 had visual checks ordered every two hours which indicated staff were to visualize the resident every two hours. She stated Resident #1 and #3 required staff assistance to get out of bed. She stated she typically rounded on her residents beginning at 11:00 p.m., then again at 1:00 a.m., 3:00 a.m., and 5:00 a.m. She stated CNAs should sit on the halls, in the section they were assigned, so they could respond to call lights and assist residents with needs because there was no ward clerk responsible to answer call lights after 10:00 p.m. She stated on the night of [DATE], Hall A had floor maintenance being completed and the staff could not walk on the floor to get to the resident's rooms. She stated the floor maintenance started around 10:00 p.m., and did not finish until approximately 2:00 a.m. She stated during that time nursing staff did not round on the residents or provide any care on Hall A. She confirmed she did not communicate this with administration. She stated she was able to see all the resident on Hall A at 10:00 p.m., but did not see them again until approximately 2:30 a.m. She stated from 10:00 p.m. to 2:30 a.m., the CNAs were not allowed to sit on their assigned areas on the hall to respond to call lights and provide care like they normally would. She stated she sat behind the nursing station where the computers were at the charge nurse desk and could not see any call lights. She stated S6CNA went into Resident #1's room around 2:30 a.m., and found the resident unresponsive. She stated she immediately went into Resident #1's room and found Resident #1 on the floor kneeling on a fall mat at her bedside, unresponsive and pulseless. She stated shortly after that, S6CNA came to her and notified her Resident #3 had also been found on the floor. She stated once she got to Resident #3, she was lying on the floor, uninjured, with a pillow under her head. She confirmed staff not performing visual checks or providing care to the residents on Hall A from 10:00 p.m. until 2:30 a.m., was neglect. She stated the first time S2ADM was notified of staff not being able to round on the residents was when S2ADM arrived onsite around 4:00 a.m., after she had notified him of Resident #1's passing. On [DATE] at 10:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8CNA. S8CNA stated she worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., shift on [DATE], and was assigned to Rooms 11-20 on Hall A. She stated she typically rounded on her residents every two hours, beginning at 10:00 p.m., then again at 12:00 a.m., 2:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., and 6:00 a.m. She stated the CNAs should sit on the halls in the section they were assigned so they could respond to call lights and assist residents with needs because there was no ward clerk responsible to answer call lights after 10:00 p.m. She stated on [DATE], she did not go to any of the resident's rooms or provide care for the residents on Hall A due to floor maintenance. She stated she was able to round on her residents at 10:00 p.m., but not again until approximately 2:30 a.m. She stated during that time, she sat at the beginning of Hall A and could see the call lights on Hall A. She stated she saw three call lights on from her assigned residents, but did not recall which residents had requested assistance. She stated she did not to respond to the call light or provide any care to those residents and should have. She stated once the floor maintenance was completed at approximately 2:30 a.m., she started rounding on her residents. She stated staff not performing visual checks on the residents and not providing care on Hall A from 10:00 p.m. until 2:30 a.m., was neglect. She stated she should have performed visual checks and responded to call lights regardless of the floor maintenance and confirmed she had not. She confirmed she did not notify S2ADM staff were unable to perform rounds or care on residents on Hall A. On [DATE] at 2:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7CNA. She stated she worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., shift on [DATE], and was assigned to Rooms 1-10 on Hall A. She stated she typically rounded on her residents every two hours, beginning at 10:00 p.m., then again at 12:00 a.m., 2:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., and 6:00 a.m. She stated CNAs should sit on the halls, in the section they were assigned, so they could respond to call lights and assist residents with needs because there was no ward clerk responsible to answer call lights after 10:00 p.m. She stated S5LPN informed her staff could not get to the resident's rooms on Hall A due to floor maintenance. She explained the hall had been blocked off so she sat in the door way of the chapel and saw a resident call light on for about an hour at approximately 1:00 a.m. She stated she was unable to recall which resident required assistance, but she stated she did not respond to the call light. She stated once the floor maintenance was done around 2:30 a.m., all 3 CNAs working went down the hall to perform visual checks on the residents. She stated S6CNA found Resident #1 kneeling on her fall mat at her bedside, and Resident #3 lying on the floor in her room. She confirmed nursing staff not performing visual checks on their residents every two hours or providing care for the residents from 10:00 p.m. until 2:30 a.m., was neglect. She stated she should have performed visual checks and responded to call lights regardless of the floor maintenance and confirmed she had not. She stated she notified S2ADM once he had arrived to the facility, that staff were unable to perform rounds on residents on Hall A. On [DATE] at 4:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #3. She stated on [DATE] she slid out of bed onto the floor. She stated she tried calling for assistance before she slid out the bed, but no one came to help her. She stated once she was on the floor it took a long time for staff to come. She stated she did not try to get back in bed on her own because she needed staff assistance. She stated she called when she was on the floor with the call button and it took a long time for staff to come. She stated, in an angry tone, it made her feel neglected and very aggravated when the staff did not come help her after calling for help and lying on the floor. On [DATE] at 1:17 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She stated nursing staff were expected to perform visual checks on the residents every two hours based on their Physician's Order and provide any needed care. She stated staff should have notified the administrator immediately if they were ever unable to follow physician's orders, perform visual checks, or provide care to residents for any reason. She stated she expected staff to respond to call lights in a timely manner and as quickly as possible. She stated neglect would be staff not providing care to residents and ignoring the needs of residents. On [DATE] at 4:36 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADM. He stated through his investigation it was discovered that the floor maintenance impeded care by not allowing the nursing staff to perform visual checks or provide care to residents on Hall A from 10:00 p.m. until approximately 2:30 a.m., on [DATE]. He confirmed Resident #1 and #3 were both found on the floor on [DATE], and by the time Resident #1 was found she was unresponsive. He stated staff should have notified him immediately when the maintenance vendor did not allow staff on Hall A. He confirmed if a resident had an order for visual checks every 2 hours he expected staff to follow the physician's order and they had not. He stated he preferred for a call light to be responded to by staff between 30 to 45 minutes at most. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: 1. Resident #1 and Resident #3 were identified as having been affected by the alleged deficient practice of not making Q2 visual checks per physician order. All residents had the potential to be affects as the result of the alleged non-compliance. 2. a. An in-service was conducted on [DATE] by the Administrator, DON and ADON for all CNA's and LPN's regarding Q2hr visual rounds. The in-service also included if there was anything that would prevent them making Q2hr rounds they should immediately notify the Administrator. To ensure that the staff understood the in-service a questionnaire was initiated on [DATE]. b. Staff unable to be in-serviced on [DATE] and forward will not be permitted to work until they are in-serviced. All new employees will be in-serviced regarding the information listed above during their orientation period. c. A log of each resident arranged by room was reimplemented on [DATE] to document direct observation checks every two hours on each shift. The monitor is broken into 2-hour increments and designated nursing staff are to sign off that the observations have been made. This monitoring will continue 24 hours/day 7 days/week for two weeks and then will be reviewed by the DON/designee. d. On [DATE], the Administrator notified the Vendor that the company employee will not be allowed to perform floor services in the absence of the Administrator. The Administrator will ensure a schedule is set for floor service times that will ensure the vendor reports directly to him at the time of the floor service. e. A QAPI monitor was reimplemented on [DATE] to ensure Q2hr rounds are completed 24hr a day 7 days a week. A nurse will be assigned to complete the Q2hr visual rounds and document the rounds on the QA Monitor. The QA Monitor will be ongoing. f. Effectiveness of the corrective actions will be discussed weekly for 6 weeks at the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Meeting with findings added to the QAPI minutes. Additional in-services and/or corrective actions will be implemented as needed. 3. As of [DATE], the facility has resolved the likelihood of serious harm or injury to any resident no longer exists. Throughout the survey from [DATE] to [DATE], observations, interviews, and record review revealed the above listed actions were implemented. Random staff interviews and observations revealed the above education for staff was completed. Observations, interviews, and record review, revealed monitoring had begun as mentioned above in the POR with no further issues identified.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on video observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving neglect wer...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on video observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving neglect were reported to the state agency within 2 hours after the allegations of neglect were made for Resident #1, Resident #3, and all other residents residing all Hall A. Findings: Cross reference: F600 Review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect Prevention Program policy, revised [DATE], revealed the following in part: Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, and misappropriation of property. 9. Neglect: failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish or mental illness. In the event of any evidence involving neglect, an occurrence will be reported immediately to the Administrator or his or her designee of the facility, who will immediately notify corporate office and the appropriate state officials per state guidelines. Review of the facility's Mandated Reporting Flowsheet, revised [DATE], revealed the following in part: Does the incident or allegation involve abuse, with or without serious bodily harm, or neglect, exploitation, injury of unknown source or other reportable incident that results in serious bodily harm (an injury involving extreme physical pain, involving substantial risk of death; requiring medical intervention)? If yes, report immediately to the administrator and to law enforcement as applicable, but not later than 2 hours to the State Survey Agency. Resident #1 Review of the facility's self-reported incident dated [DATE] revealed the following: Events Entered: [DATE] at 9:43 a.m. Occurred and Discovered: [DATE] at 2:45 a.m. Type of injury: Blank Incident description: Initial investigation: The fall of Resident #1 was reported to S2ADM at 4:01 a.m. Developing Issues: While investigating the incident involving the resident, it came to light that a vendor working on the floors may have impeded making rounds every 2 hours. Review of Resident #1's Nurses' Note dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: On [DATE] at 2:42 a.m.: Upon doing rounds aide walked into room and found resident unresponsive on fall mat. Nurse was immediately called to room upon entering room nurse noticed resident on her fall mat in a kneeling position facing the bed. Unable to obtain pulse or blood pressure upon assessment. Initiated CPR immediately. 911 notified. At 2:53 a.m., Coroner's office notified. Signed by: S5LPN. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's Nurses Note dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: On [DATE] at 2:53 a.m.: Upon doing rounds aide found Resident #3 lying down on the floor, nurse was immediately called to the room. Signed by: S5LPN. Review of the CNA Daily Assignment Sheet from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: S7CNA was assigned to care for the residents residing on Hall A Rooms 1-10 S8CNA was assigned to care for the residents residing on Hall A Rooms 11-20 S6CNA was assigned to care for the residents residing on Hall A Rooms 21-30 On [DATE] at 2:04 p.m., a review of the facility's video surveillance footage of Hall A, dated [DATE] from 12:00 a.m. until approximately 4:45 a.m., was conducted with S2ADM. Prior to reviewing the footage, S2ADM stated he did not have access to any surveillance footage prior to [DATE] at 12:00 a.m. The surveillance footage revealed from 12:00 a.m. to approximately 2:35 a.m., staff neglected to provide any care and services to any resident's residing on Hall A. At 12:35 a.m., a call light was observed to be on in Hall A, which indicated a resident was calling for assistance. S2ADM confirmed the above review of the facility footage revealed no staff rounded on or provided care to any resident on Hall A from 12:00 a.m., on [DATE] until approximately 2:37 a.m. On [DATE] at 11:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6CNA. She stated she worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift on [DATE] and was assigned to provide care for Resident #1 and Resident #3, as well as the residents in Rooms 21-30 on Hall A. She stated on [DATE], she was not able to provide care to her assigned residents on Hall A from 10:00 p.m. to 2:30 a.m., due to floor maintenance. On [DATE] at 3:29 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. S5LPN stated she was assigned to provide care for Resident #1, #3, and all of the residents on Hall A on [DATE] and worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift. She stated on the night of [DATE] she did not provide care to her assigned residents on Hall A from 10:00 p.m. until 2:30 a.m. due to floor maintenance. On [DATE] at 10:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8CNA. S8CNA stated she worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., shift on [DATE], and was assigned to Rooms 11-20 on Hall A. She stated on [DATE], she did not go to any of the resident's rooms or provide care for the residents on Hall A due to floor maintenance from 10:00 p.m. until 2:30 a.m. On [DATE] at 2:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7CNA. She stated she worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., shift on [DATE], and was assigned to Rooms 1-10 on Hall A. She stated she did not perform visual checks every two hours or provide care for her assigned residents from 10:00 p.m. until 2:30 a.m. On [DATE] at 4:36 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADM. He stated on [DATE] at approximately 4:00 a.m., S5LPN made him aware the floor vendor impeded care by not allowing nursing staff to perform visual checks on residents on Hall A from 10:00 p.m. until approximately 2:30 a.m. He confirmed no residents residing on Hall A received care from 10:00 p.m. through 2:30 a.m. on [DATE]. He confirmed any allegations of neglect should be reported to the State Survey Agency within 2 hours. He confirmed he submitted the incident to the State Survey Agency on [DATE].
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0700 (Tag F0700)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for risk of entrapmen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for risk of entrapment from bedrails and informed consents were obtained prior to installation of bedrails for 4 (#1, #3, #R1, and #R2) of 4 sampled residents identified for having bedrails in use. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 51 residents residing in the facility with bedrails in use. Findings: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Foot Drop of Right and Left Foot, Muscle Weakness (generalized), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis, Abnormal Posture, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Need of Assistance for Personal Care. Further review revealed Resident #1 expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's most recent completed Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident #1 was dependent on staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #1's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date [DATE]: Mobility bars x2 to assist with bed mobility and repositioning every shift. Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: Start date [DATE]: Mobility bars x2 to assist with bed mobility and repositioning every shift. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed no documentation of Entrapment Risk Assessments for bedrails. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed no documentation of informed consent for bedrails. An interview was conducted with S5LPN on [DATE] at 3:29 p.m. She stated anytime Resident #1 was in bed, her mobility bars were in a raised position. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Muscle Wasting, Muscle Weakness and Lack of Coordination. Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS with an ARD of [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed she required partial to substantial/max assist with bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #3's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date [DATE]: Mobility bars x2 to assist with bed mobility and repositioning, every shift. Review of Resident #3's MAR dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: Start date [DATE]: Mobility bars x2 to assist with bed mobility and repositioning, every shift. Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed no documentation of Entrapment Risk Assessments for bedrails prior to [DATE]. Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed no documentation of informed consent for bedrails. An observation was made and interview was conducted with Resident #3 on [DATE] at 3:45p.m. Resident #3's bed had two mobility bars, one on each side of the bed, in an upright position. Resident #3 confirmed she had not signed a consent for bedrails when the bedrails were implemented, and she used the bedrails for mobility. Resident #R1 Review of Resident #R1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Muscle Weakness and Acute Paralytic Poliomyelitis. Review of Resident #R1's quarterly MDS with an ARD of [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Further review revealed he required substantial/max assist with bed mobility. Review of Resident #R1's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date [DATE]: Mobility bars x2 to assist with bed mobility and repositioning, every shift. Review of Resident #R1's MAR dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: Start date [DATE]: Mobility bars x2 to assist with bed mobility and repositioning, every shift. Review of Resident #R1's Clinical Record revealed no documentation of Entrapment Risk Assessments for bedrails prior to [DATE]. Review of Resident #R1's Clinical Record revealed no documentation of informed consent for bedrails. An observation was made and interview was conducted with Resident #R1 on [DATE] at 4:15 p.m. Resident #R1's bed had two mobility bars, one on each side of the bed, in an upright position. Resident #R1 confirmed he had not signed a consent for bedrails when the bedrails were implemented, and he used the bedrail for mobility. Resident #R2 Review of Resident #R2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Repeated Falls, Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and Other Lack of Coordination. Review of Resident #R2's quarterly MDS with an ARD of [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS of 14, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed she required substantial/max assist with bed mobility. Review of Resident #R2's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date [DATE]: Mobility rails x2 to assist with bed mobility and repositioning, every shift. Review of Resident #R2's MAR dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: Start date [DATE]: Mobility rails x2 to assist with bed mobility and repositioning, every shift. Review of Resident #R2's Clinical Record revealed no documentation of Entrapment Risk Assessments for bedrails prior to [DATE]. Review of Resident #R2's Clinical Record revealed no documentation of informed consent for bedrails. An observation was made and interview was conducted with Resident #R2 on [DATE] at 3:29 p.m. Resident #R2's bed had two mobility bars, one on each side of the bed, in an upright position. Resident #R2 confirmed she had not signed a consent for bedrails when the bedrails were implemented, and she used the bedrails for mobility. An interview was conducted with S9CRN on [DATE] at 1:35 p.m. She stated she and another staff member completed entrapment risk assessments. She stated the facility does not obtain consents for bed rails prior to installing them if they are not being used as a restraint. She confirmed they had not obtained informed consents for mobility bars prior to installing them, and no entrapment risk evaluations had been completed prior to [DATE]. An interview was conducted with S3DON on [DATE] at 3:01 p.m. She stated no staff was assigned to perform entrapment risk assessments or obtain informed consents for residents who had mobility bars ordered. She stated informed consents were not obtained to indicate Resident's #1, #3, #R1, and R#2 had given consent for the mobility bars. She stated entrapment risk assessments were not conducted for residents with mobility bars prior to [DATE]. She stated she was unaware consents and entrapment risk assessments should be completed prior to installing mobility bars.
Feb 2025 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' assessments accurately reflected the residents' ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' assessments accurately reflected the residents' status by failing to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded for PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) for 1 of 1 (#99 ) resident reviewed for PASRR. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Policy revealed, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to conduct and document, initially and periodically, a comprehensive, accurate assessment on all residents. Comprehensive assessments will accurately describe each resident's functional capacity using a standardized, reproducible, state approved form, referred to as the MDS or RAI. The assessment will be completed by following the specific directions found in the RAI manual. Review of Resident #99's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Autistic Disorder. Review of Resident #99's 142 Form Notification of Medical Certification revealed, an approval for admission by the state Level II Authority for a temporary period effective 11/04/2024 through 08/04/2025. Review of Resident #99's admission MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/12/2024 revealed, Section A1500 PASRR: Is the resident currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition, was coded as 0-No. Section A1510 Level II PASRR conditions was blank. An interview was conducted with S15CCC on 02/27/2025 at 10:49 a.m. S15CCC stated she was responsible for completing Resident #99's MDS assessment. She verified Resident #99's Form 142 indicated Resident #99 was approved for nursing home admission by Level II authority effective 11/04/2024. She reviewed Resident #99's admission MDS dated [DATE]. S15CCC confirmed Section A1500 should have been coded as 1-Yes, and was not. An interview was conducted on 02/27/2025 at 10:55 a.m. with S2DON. S2DON verified Resident #99's Form 142 indicated Resident #99 was approved for nursing home admission by Level II authority effective 11/04/2024. She reviewed Resident #99's admission MDS dated [DATE]. S2DON confirmed Section A1500 should have been coded as 1-Yes, and was not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provis...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for 1 (#56) of 3 (#52, #56, #80) residents reviewed for respiratory services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #56's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were properly labeled. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Oxygen Administration (Concentrator or Tank) revealed, in part: Policy: Humidifier bottles, cannulas and oxygen (O2) tubing will be changed at least once weekly and dated. Review of Resident #56's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Alzheimer's Disease and Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen. Review of Resident #56's Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date: 02/23/2025: Oxygen at 3 liters per nasal cannula continuously for comfort. On 02/24/2025 at 10:25 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #56's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle which were not properly labeled with the date last changed. On 02/24/2025 at 10:49 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #56's oxygen tubing with S3ADON. S3ADON confirmed the oxygen tubing was not labeled with the date last changed. On 02/24/2025 at 10:56 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON confirmed Resident #56's oxygen tubing was not labeled with the date last changed and should have been. She stated the facility's oxygen administration policy was for the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles to be changed weekly by nursing staff. S2DON confirmed all oxygen tubing and/or humidifier bottles should be labeled with the date last changed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0699 (Tag F0699)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) received trauma-informed care and services in accordance with professional s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) received trauma-informed care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 (#93) resident residing in the facility with PTSD. The facility failed to assess and develop a plan of care for Resident #93's history of trauma. Findings: Review of Resident #93's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 03/29/2024 with diagnoses, which included PTSD and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #93's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/03/2025 revealed a diagnosis of PTSD. Further review of the MDS revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #93's Physician History and Physical by S4NP, dated 04/02/2024, revealed a diagnosis of PTSD. Further review revealed no documentation of an assessment and identification of triggers for the PTSD. Review of Resident #93's Initial Social Service History completed by S10SSD dated 03/29/2024 revealed the following, in part: Disabilities: PTSD Further review revealed no documentation of an assessment of the trauma, triggers, and/or interventions. Review of Resident #93's electronic and physical Clinical Record revealed no documentation of a trauma assessment, identification of triggers, and/or any interventions in place regarding his PTSD. Review of Resident #93's current Care Plan provided by the facility revealed no documentation regarding PTSD. An interview was conducted with Resident #93 on 02/25/2025 at 12:29 p.m. He confirmed he had PTSD. Resident #93 identified the source of his trauma. An interview was conducted with S11LPN on 02/26/2025 at 9:59 a.m. She stated she was unaware of Resident #93's PTSD. She stated she should have been aware Resident #93 had PTSD. She stated Resident #93 should have had a care plan identifying triggers so they could have been avoided. An interview was conducted with S8CNA on 02/26/2025 at 10:03 a.m. She stated she was unaware of Resident #93's PTSD. An interview was conducted with S13CNA on 02/26/2025 at 10:54 a.m. She stated she was assigned to Resident #93 daily. She stated she was unaware of Resident #93's PTSD. She stated she should have been aware of Resident #93's PTSD and any interventions in place. An interview was conducted with S14CCC on 02/26/2025 at 12:05 p.m. She confirmed she was responsible for Resident #93's care plan. She confirmed there was not documentation on Resident #93's current care plan regarding his PTSD, and there should have been. She stated she would have relied on a trauma assessment to develop interventions for Resident #93's PTSD. An interview was conducted with S2DON and S10SSD on 02/25/2025 at 1:38 p.m. S2DON and S10SSD confirmed there was no PTSD or Trauma Assessment in Resident #93's Clinical Record. S2DON confirmed there was no documentation on Resident #93's current Care Plan of his PTSD diagnosis, history of trauma, triggers, and/or interventions. S2DON confirmed Resident #93's Care Plan should have included his PTSD and interventions. An interview was conducted with S12CN on 02/26/2025 at 10:41 a.m. She stated, at the time of admission, a PTSD assessment should have been completed for a resident with a PTSD diagnosis. She stated any PTSD triggers should have been identified and the interdisciplinary team should have put interventions in place. She stated the PTSD diagnosis, cause of the PTSD, and all interventions should have been on the care plan. She stated the direct care staff should have been aware of the PTSD diagnosis and any interventions in place. An interview was conducted with S9PNP on 02/26/2025 at 11:58 a.m. He confirmed Resident #93 had PTSD. He stated he did not perform PTSD or trauma assessments. He stated he had not identified the source or triggers of Resident #93's trauma. An interview was conducted with S1ADM on 02/26/2025 at 2:15 p.m. He confirmed Resident #93's PTSD and interventions should have been on his care plan and were not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to meet the need...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to meet the needs of each resident by failing to ensure orders were accurately transcribed for 1 of 1 (#49) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of the undated policy titled, Orders: Medications, revealed the following, in part: Policy: Medications are administered only upon the clear and complete order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe. Verbal Orders are received only by licensed nurses or physician assistants and confirmed in writing by the prescriber within 7 days. Procedure: 1. Elements of the medication order: a. Medication orders specify the following: v. Route of the medication order Review of Resident #49's clinical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. Review of Resident #49's Order Summary Report dated 02/27/2025 revealed the following, in part: Order Date: 02/03/2025 -Flagyl Oral Tablet 500 mg. Give 1 tablet enterally every day shift every Monday, Wednesday, Friday related to Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. Review of Resident #49's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 02/01/2025 to 02/28/2025 revealed the following, in part: Flagyl Oral Tablet 500 mg. Give 1 tablet enterally every day shift every Monday, Wednesday, Friday related to Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. On 02/26/2025 at 9:03 a.m., an observation was made of S5WCN and S6LPN perform wound care on Resident #49's pressure ulcer of sacral region. S5WCN stated Flagyl 500 mg is crushed and placed into the wound bed. On 02/26/2025 at 9:03 a.m., S6LPN was observed to cleanse Resident #49's sacral wound and apply crushed Flagyl 500 mg to the wound bed. On 02/27/2025 at 3:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5WCN. S5WCN confirmed Flagyl 500 mg was crushed and applied to Resident #49's wound bed during wound care. S5WCN confirmed she received and entered the order to crush and apply Flagyl 500 mg to sacral wound. S5WCN reviewed Resident #49's MD order for Flagyl and the TAR. S5WCN confirmed the orders was not accurately transcribed. On 02/27/2025 at 3:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4NP. S4NP confirmed the order for Flagyl 500 mg, Give 1 tablet enterally was incorrect. S4NP stated the order for Flagyl 500 mg was supposed to read crush and apply to wound bed. On 02/27/2025 at 3:32 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3ADON. S3ADON reviewed the order for Resident #49's Flagyl 500 mg and confirmed it read for the medication to be administered enterally. S3ADON confirmed the order was not accurately transcribed. On 02/27/2025 at 3:58 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON reviewed Resident #49's order for Flagyl 500 mg to give one tablet enterally was not accurately transcribed. S2DON confirmed the order should have been transcribed to read, crush and apply to wound bed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct food portio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct food portions as ordered by a physician for 1 (#13) of 2 (#13 and #90) sampled residents reviewed for dietary services. Findings: Review of the undated facility policy titled Diet Orders/Changes revealed the following, in part: Policy: New diet orders and changes in diet will be communicated in writing to the Dietary Department by the Nursing Staff in a timely manner. Purpose: To assure each resident receives the diet as ordered by the physician. Procedure: 1. Upon receiving the diet order, the Food Service Supervisor will change the resident tray card as needed. 2. The dietary [NAME] will be updated with the new diet and date of change in order. Review of Resident #13's clinical record revealed Resident ##13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Iron Deficiency Anemia, Deficiency of Other Vitamins, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, and Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3. Review of Resident #13's Order Summary Report dated 02/26/2025 revealed the following, in part: 08/19/2024 Regular Diet Mechanical Soft Texture, Regular/Thin consistency - double portions (lunch/supper). Review of Resident #13's current care plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: Potential for altered nutrition and dehydration related to Chronic Kidney Disease, History of Gastrointestinal Bleed, Anemia, and Vitamin Deficiency. Goal: Will maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced by maintaining a stable weight. Review of Resident #13's undated dietary meal ticket revealed the following, in part: Diet: Regular Texture: Mechanical Soft Fluid: Thin Liquids On 02/26/2025 at 11:58 a.m., an observation was made of S8CNA delivering Resident #13's meal tray. S8CNA observed and confirmed the following: 1 piece of white bread 1 serving of broccoli 1 serving rice 1 serving of ground Salisbury steak 1 serving of dessert. On 02/26/2025 at 11:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8CNA. S8CNA observed Resident #13's meal tray and confirmed the meal tray did not contain double portions. On 02/26/2025 at 1:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7DM. S7DM reviewed Resident #13's meal ticket and confirmed it did not indicate double portions. S7DM reviewed Resident #13's orders and confirmed Resident #13 had an order for double portions. S7DM confirmed Resident #13 should have received double portions. On 02/26/2025 at 2:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM confirmed if Resident #13 had a doctor's order for double portions, the resident should have received double portions.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation of the route of medication admini...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation of the route of medication administration for 1 of 1 (#49) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of the undated policy titled Orders: Medications revealed the following, in part: Policy: Medications are administered only upon the clear and complete order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe. Verbal Orders are received only by licensed nurses or physician assistants and confirmed in writing by the prescriber within 7 days. Procedure: 1. Elements of the medication order: a. Medication orders specify the following: v. Route of the medication order Review of Resident #49's clinical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included, Unstageable Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region and Osteomyelitis of Sacral and Sacrococcygeal Region Vertebra. Review of Resident #49's Order Summary Report dated 02/27/2025 revealed the following, in part: Order Date: 02/03/2025 - Flagyl Oral Tablet 500 mg. Give 1 tablet enterally every day shift every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday related to Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. Review of Resident #49's Treatment Administration Record dated 02/01/2025 to 02/28/2025 revealed the Flagyl 500 mg was administered enterally on the following dates by the following staff: the following, in part: 02/05/2025 by S6LPN, 02/07/2025 by S6LPN, 02/10/2025 by S6LPN, 02/12/2025 by S6LPN, 02/14/2025 by S5WCN, 02/17/2025 by S6LPN, 02/19/2025 by S6LPN, 02/21/2025 by S5WCN, and 02/24/2025 by S6LPN. On 02/27/2025 at 3:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4NP. S4NP confirmed the order for Flagyl 500 mg Give 1 tablet enterally was incorrect. S4NP stated the order for Flagyl 500 mg should have read crush and apply to wound bed. On 02/27/2025 at 3:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5WCN. S5WCN reviewed Resident #49's TAR and confirmed she and S6LPN were signing off the orders for Flagyl 500 mg as being administered enterally. S5WCN confirmed she and S6LPN were crushing the Flagyl 500 mg and applying it to Resident #49's wound bed. S5WCN confirmed she and S6LPN were signing off the Flagyl 500 mg was administered to Resident #49 by an incorrect route, which was inaccurate documentation. On 02/27/2025 at 3:58 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON reviewed Resident #49's order for Flagyl 500 mg to give one tablet enterally. S2DON reviewed Resident #49's TAR and confirmed S5WCN and S6LPN were documenting Resident #49's Flagyl as being administered enterally. S2DON confirmed if S5WCN and S6LPN were applying to Flagyl to Resident #49's wound bed, the documentation on the TAR was inaccurate.
Dec 2024 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, video observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent elopement from the facility for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, R1 and R2) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 12/14/2024 at 4:32 a.m. when Resident #1, a moderately cognitively impaired resident with a physician's order for staff to visually check the resident every 2 hours, eloped from the facility. On 12/14/2024, staff last visualized Resident #1 at approximately 4:00 a.m. Resident #1 was observed on video footage eloping from the facility by climbing over the patio fence at 4:32 a.m., without staff knowledge. Facility staff had not realized Resident #1 eloped from the facility until approximately 8:00 a.m. The resident was found by local police officers at a local gas station on 12/18/2024 at approximately 2:38 p.m. S2ADM was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 12/19/2024 at 6:14 p.m. This deficient practice continued at a likelihood to cause more than minimal harm to the remaining 100 residents residing in the facility with orders to be visually checked. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 12/20/2024 at 2:03 p.m., when it was determined the facility had implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal as confirmed through onsite interviews, observations, and record review. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy, titled Wandering or Missing Resident, read in part . Procedure: 4. Any staff member becoming aware of a resident not being at the designated area or activity shall proceed to notify the charge nurse, Director of Nursing and the Administrator. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses which included in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Undifferentiated Schizophrenia and Disorganized Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/21/2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12, which indicated Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's 12/2024 Physician's Orders revealed in part: Visual check for resident's location every 2 hours, every shift. Start date: 09/03/2024. Review of Resident #1's Nurses' Note dated 12/2024 revealed the following, in part: On 12/14/2024 at 11:38 a.m., Resident not noted in his room at breakfast time. Asked his roommate but he was unsure. Checked rooms on the hallway and the shower. Checked the patio areas. Notified RN supervisor and CNA supervisor. S4ADON called and informed S2ADM. Call placed to Resident's brother-in-law at 10:15 a.m. to let him know that resident was missing. Resident's sister called back about 10:50 a.m., and spoke to S2ADM. Staff drove on local highway to look for resident but were unsuccessful. After replaying the video footage resident climbed the patio fence at approximately 4:30 am. Call placed to physicians on call answering service. Signed by: S5LPN. Review of a written statement from S6CNA dated 12/14/2024 revealed the following: Upon arriving I did my room rounds, all residents was accounted for. Around 3:00 a.m. or 4:00 a.m., Resident #1 came out room to get ice and walk hall, this is a regular routine. On my last round, I went into Resident #1's room to turn his roommate, I noticed that Resident #1 wasn't in room, I finished my last round getting resident up. On 12/19/2024 at 10:37 a.m., a review of the facility's video surveillance footage dated 12/14/2024 from 4:00 a.m. until 9:00 a.m. was conducted with S2ADM of the hall Resident #1 resided on as well as the patio area. Review of the surveillance footage revealed on 12/14/2024 at 4:32 a.m., Resident #1 was observed using a chair to climb over the patio gate and left the facility's premises. Further review of the surveillance footage revealed staff failed to perform visual checks on Resident #1 every two hours as ordered, after he left the facility at 4:32 a.m., until 8:30 a.m. when staff are seen looking for Resident #1. On 12/19/2024 at 10:20 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S9LPN. She stated she was the nurse assigned to Resident #1 on 12/13/2024 and worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift. She stated Resident #1 was cognitive and able to understand and be understood. She stated he was also able to ambulate independently. She confirmed Resident #1 had visual checks ordered every two hours which meant staff were to visualize the resident every two hours. She stated she conducted rounds at 10:00 p.m., 12:00 a.m., 2:00 a.m., and 4:00 a.m. She stated at approximately 4:00 a.m., she went in Resident #1's room to give his roommate medication, and saw Resident #1 in his bed. She confirmed this was the last time she visually saw Resident #1 on 12/14/2024 as her final round was at 4:00 a.m., and her shift ended at 6:00 a.m. She confirmed no staff had notified her Resident #1 had not been seen after 4:00 a.m. On 12/19/2024 at 1:48 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S6CNA. She stated was assigned to Resident #1 on 12/13/2024 and worked the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift. She stated Resident #1 ambulated independently. She confirmed Resident #1 had visual checks ordered every two hours which meant staff were to visualize the resident every two hours. She stated she conducted rounds at 10:00 p.m., 12:00 a.m., 2:00 a.m., and begins her last round at about 4:00 a.m. She stated she last saw Resident #1 between 3:30 a.m. and 4:00 a.m. on 12/14/2024 getting ice from cooler in hallway. She stated she went into the resident's room to perform her last round between 4:45 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. and Resident #1 was not in his room at that time. She confirmed she did not notify staff Resident #1 was not observed during her last round, nor did she try to locate him at that time, and should have. On 12/19/2024 at 2:27 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7CNA. She stated she worked on 12/14/2024 on the 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. shift passing meal trays on Resident #1s hall but she was not his CNA for that day. She stated Resident #1 was ordered visual checks every 2 hours, which meant staff were to visualize the resident every two hours. She stated when she went in Resident #1's room around 7:30 a.m. to pass breakfast trays she asked his roommate if he had seen Resident #1. She stated his roommate said he just left out, but he would be right back. She stated she left Resident #1's tray in his room and walked out. On 12/19/2024 at 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S11CNA. She stated she worked the 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. shift on 12/14/2024 and was the CNA assigned to Resident #1 on 12/14/2024. She stated Resident #1 was ordered visual checks every 2 hours, which meant staff were to visualize the resident every two hours. She stated she began rounding on residents at around 6:30 a.m. She stated by the time she made it into Resident #1's room it was about 7:30 a.m., and she did not see Resident #1. She stated she notified S5LPN that Resident #1 was not in his room. On 12/20/2024 at 1:05 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S5LPN. He stated he was the nurse assigned to Resident #1 on 12/14/2024. He stated Resident #1 had visual checks ordered every two hours. He stated he rounded on residents every two hours or every one hour if ordered sooner. He stated he did not observe Resident #1 come get his morning medication on 12/14/2024 before breakfast around 7:00 a.m., which was unusual since Resident #1 typically came out to the hall to receive his morning medications. He stated he asked Resident #1's roommate if he had seen him, and he answered no. He stated he asked CNAs if they had seen him and they were not sure. He stated between 8:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. after searching for Resident #1 and being unable to locate him, he notified the RN supervisor and the CNA supervisor that the resident could not be found. He stated staff searched the facility for Resident #1 and were unable to locate him. He stated at that time the supervisor notified S4ADON and S2ADM Resident #1 was missing from the facility. On 12/20/2024 at 1:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12CNAS. She stated at approximately 8:00 a.m. on 12/14/2024, S5LPN notified her he could not locate Resident #1. She stated she notified S13RNS and a Code W was called. She stated a Code w meant she and staff CNAs would go room to room and completed a total count of all residents. She confirmed Resident #1 was not present in the facility during the head count. She stated CNAs were expected to perform visual checks on residents every two hours and if the staff were unable to locate the resident upon visual checks they were to notify the nurse immediately. She stated nursing staff were expected to search the facility and locate the resident if unable to visualize the resident in their room prior to documenting completion of a round. On 12/20/2024 at 1:43 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She stated she was notified on 12/14/2024 sometime between 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Resident #1 had eloped from the facility by S13RNS. She stated staff initiated a code W, which meant staff search the entire facility for the resident, and do a complete head count to ensure all other residents are accounted for, and inform Resident representative, doctors, and local law enforcement that a resident was missing. She confirmed Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 12/14/2024 at approximately 4:32 a.m. She stated on 12/18/2024 S1CADM notified her Resident #1 was located at a local gas station. At that time, Resident #1 signed the Against Medical Advice (AMA) form, and refused to return to the facility or seek medical attention. She stated nursing staff were expected to perform visual checks on the residents every two hours based on their Physician's Order. She stated staff were expected to search the facility if unable to visually observe the resident during rounds, and notify the nurse, herself, S4ADON, or S2ADM immediately. On 12/26/2024 at 2:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADM. S2ADM confirmed Resident #1 was missing for four days and no staff had visually observed him since 12/14/2024 at 4:00 a.m. until he was found on 12/18/2024 at 2:38 a.m. He stated he was notified by staff on 12/14/2024 around 9:00 a.m. that Resident #1 was not on the premises. He then reviewed the facility surveillance footage where Resident #1 was observed climbing over the patio fence and left the facility premises on 12/14/2024 at 4:32 a.m. S2ADM confirmed staff did not realize he was gone until approximately 8:00 a.m. S2ADM further confirmed staff failed to adequately supervise Resident #1 by not performing visual checks every two hours on Resident #1 as ordered. The facility had implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice on 12/19/2024: 1) Resident #1 left the facility against medical advice on 12/14/2024. The facility allegedly failed to effectively maintain its highest practical physical, mental, psychosocial well-being for this 1 resident by failing to ensure the resident was adequately supervised to monitor a resident who is leaving against medical advice without signing the sign-out log. All residents had the potential to be affected as the result of the alleged non-compliance. 2) The Administrator and DON in-serviced all present nursing staff on 12/19/2024 at 6:30 p.m. The in-service included performing every 2 hour visual checks on all residents. The in-services also included the existing policy Wandering or Missing Resident that includes Code W. Staff unable to be in serviced on 12/19/2024 at 6:30 p.m. will not be permitted to work until they are in-serviced. All new employees will be in-serviced regarding the information listed above during their orientation period. A log of each resident arranged by room was implemented on 12/19/2024 to document direct observation checks every two hours on each shift. The monitor is broken into 2-hour increments and designated nursing staff are to sign off that the observations have been made. This monitoring will continue 24 hours/day 7 days/week for two weeks and then will be reviewed by the DON/designee. Resident patios will be monitored by a designated staff member to help ensure resident safety. Beginning at 7 p.m. on 12/19/2024, the staff will sit at the north and south smoking patio doors and go outside to monitor any resident who exits. This monitoring will continue 24 hours/day 7 days/week for two weeks and then 3 times a week for six weeks and then as needed thereafter. The Wander Data Collection Tool is completed by the MDS nurses at time of admission, quarterly, significant change in status. The tool is a scoring system indicating if a resident has a Definite Risk for elopement with a score of 3 or more YES answers, and is At Risk with a YES answer. The tally of the answers for YES is completed, and the nurse summarizes her findings on the back of the risk page which determines the most appropriate intervention accordingly, or if needed. On 12/20/2024, the MDS nurses began an audit of all elopement risk assessments. All residents that are identified as a risk for elopement will be discussed with the IDT in the QA meeting to determine if a plan of action is needed for those residents. To ensure the facility staff understand the in-service that was started on 12/19/2024, a questionnaire will be created by the Administrative Staff. Beginning on 12/20/2024, employees will complete the questionnaire to validate their understanding of the facility policy related to Wandering or Missing Resident. 3) As of 12/19/2024, the facility has resolved the likelihood of serious harm or injury to any resident no longer exists. Throughout the survey from 12/19/2024 to 12/26/2024, observations, interviews, and record review revealed the above listed actions were implemented. Random staff interviews revealed staff received training on supervision, visual checks, wandering or missing residents and completed questionnaires testing their knowledge. Observations were made throughout the survey with no supervision concerns identified. Observations, interviews, and record review, revealed monitoring had begun with no further issues identified.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was reported to the State Survey A...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was reported to the State Survey Agency in the required timeframe for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #R1 and R2) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect Prevention Program policy (Revised 09/08/2021) revealed the following in part: B. Neglect: Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. A Nursing Facility must report to the State Survey Agency incidents of alleged neglect and all situations in which a Nursing Facility has cause to believe that the physical or mental health and/or welfare of a resident has been or may be adversely affected by neglect caused by another person. Neglect may include but is not limited to: Failure to provide adequate supervision . In the event of any evidence involving neglect, an occurrence will be reported immediately to the Administrator of his or her designee of the facility, who will immediately notify corporate office and the appropriate state officials per state guidelines. Review of the facility's Mandated Reporting Flowsheet revealed the following in part: Does the incident or allegation involve neglect, exploitation or other reportable incident that poses a threat to the resident's health and safety but does not result in serious bodily harm? Report immediately to the Administrator, but not later than 24 hours to the State Survey Agency. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, including: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperosmolarity Without Nonketotic Hyperglycemic-Hyperosmolar Coma, Undifferentiated Schizophrenia and Disorganized Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #1's 12/2024 Physician's Orders revealed in part: Visual check for resident's location every 2 hours, every shift. Start date: 09/03/2024. Review of Resident #1's Nursing Progress Note dated 12/14/2024 at 11:38 a.m. revealed the following, in part: Resident not noted in his room at breakfast time. Asked his roommate, but he was unsure. Checked rooms on the hallway and the shower. Checked the patio areas. Notified RN Supervisor and CNA Supervisor. Call placed to S4ADON by RN Supervisor. S4ADON called and informed S2ADM. Call placed to Resident #1's brother-in-law at 10:15 a.m. to let him know resident was missing. Resident #1's sister called back about 10:50 a.m. and spoke to S2ADM. Staff drove on nearby highway to look for Resident #1 but were unsuccessful. After review of the facility's video footage, it appeared resident climbed over the fence on patio at about 4:30 a.m. Call placed to Resident #1's physicians on call answering service. Signed by: S5LPN Review of facility's Incident Investigation Report dated 12/14/2024, titled Elopement revealed documentation Resident #1 elopement from the facility on 12/14/2024. On 12/19/2024 at 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S11CNA. She stated she worked the 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. shift on 12/14/2024 and she was the CNA assigned to Resident #1 on 12/14/2024. She stated on 12/14/2024 at approximately 7:30 a.m. she walked in Resident #1's room and she only saw his roommate in bed and she did not see Resident #1. She stated she notified S5LPN, Resident #1's nurse that Resident #1 was not in his room. On 12/20/2024 at 1:05 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S5LPN. He stated he worked on 12/14/2024 and was the nurse assigned to Resident #1 that day. He stated he did not see Resident #1 come get his morning medication on 12/14/2024 before breakfast around 7:00 a.m. He stated after searching for Resident #1 he notified the RN supervisor on weekends and the CNA supervisor. He stated staff searched the facility for Resident #1 and were unable to locate him. He stated at that time the weekend supervisor notified S4ADON and S2ADM. On 12/26/2024 at 2:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADM. S2ADM stated Resident #1 was missing for four days and no staff had physically seen him from 12/14/2024 until he was found on 12/18/2024. He stated he was notified by staff on 12/14/2024 at approximately 9:00 a.m. that Resident #1 was not on the property and no one could find him. He confirmed by reviewing the facility surveillance footage, Resident #1 was seen leaving the facility on 12/14/2024 at 4:32 a.m. He confirmed staff failed to adequately supervise Resident #1 by not performing visual checks every two hours on Resident #1 as ordered. S2ADM further confirmed he did not report the incident to the State Survey Agency.
Aug 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was evidenced by failing to ensure a resident with orders for heel protectors failed to have pressure reducing interventions implemented per Physician's Orders for 1 (#2) of 9 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, and #R6) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of UTI's and Cerebral Infarction. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/21/2024 revealed she had a BIMS of 6, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #2's Physician's Order dated 07/01/2024 revealed an order for heel protectors to bilateral heels. On 08/13/2024 at 10:34 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #2. No heel protectors were observed to her heels, and her heels were not floated off the bed. On 08/13/2024 at 12:57 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #2. No heel protectors were observed to her heels, and her heels were not floated off the bed. On 08/13/2024 at 2:40 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #2. No heel protectors were observed to her heels, and her heels were not floated off the bed. On 08/14/2024 at 8:15 a.m., an observation was conducted with Resident #2. No heel protectors were observed to her heels, and her heels were not floated off the bed. On 08/14/2024 at 10:57 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #2. No heel protectors were observed to her heels, and her heels were not floated off the bed. On 08/14/2024 at 11:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9CNA. She stated Resident #2 did not have heel protectors, or if she did, she had never seen them. She stated she usually put a pillow behind Resident #2's ankles to float her heels off the bed. At that time, an observation was made with S9CNA of Resident #2's. She confirmed there were no heel protectors in place, nor were her heels elevated off the bed. She was notified of the observations on 08/13/2024, and confirmed she was assigned to Resident #2 on 08/13/2024 and did not float her heels or place bilateral heel protectors. On 08/14/2024 at 11:25 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She was notified of the observations made of Resident #2 on 08/13/2024 and 08/14/2024. She stated wound care was responsible for ensuring heel protectors were in place. On 08/14/2024 at 11:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. She stated it was the CNA's responsibility to ensure heel protectors were in place. She was notified of the observations of Resident #2 not having bilateral heel protectors in place on 08/13/2024 and 08/14/2024, and stated she should have had them on. She stated the last time she observed Resident #2's heel boots on her heels was on 08/12/2024 at 10:00 a.m. when she performed the resident's body audit. She stated Resident #2 was at risk for skin breakdown. She confirmed the heel boots were supposed to be worn at all times while Resident #2 was in bed. On 08/14/2024 at 2:03 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She was made aware of the observations on 08/13/2024 and 08/14/2024 of Resident #2 not having bilateral heel protectors in place. She reviewed Resident #2's Physician Orders and stated staff should have ensured the resident had the heel protectors in place since there was an order for them. She stated Resident #2 was at risk for skin breakdown.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy to residents when receiving assista...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy to residents when receiving assistance with personal care for 3 (#2, #R1 and #R5) of 5 (#2, #3, #R1, #R3, and #R5) residents observed during Activities of Daily Living. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Privacy curtains were pulled and the room door was closed prior to staff providing incontinence care to Resident #2 and Resident #R1; and 2. Resident #R5 had privacy curtains around his bed and were pulled prior to staff providing incontinence care. Findings: 1. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Urinary Tract Infections and Cerebral Infarction. On 08/13/2024 at 5:10 a.m., an observation was made of S11CNA performing incontinence care for Resident #2. Resident #2 shared a room with one other resident, and Resident #2's bed was located closest to the door/entrance into the room. Resident #2's roommate was present in the room. S11CNA did not close the door or pull the privacy curtain before providing care to Resident #2. During the care, S11CNA exited the room, left the room door open and Resident #2's buttocks and legs were exposed. Resident #R1 Review of Resident #R1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-dominant Side. On 08/13/2024 at 5:02 a.m., an observation was made of S11CNA performing care for Resident #R1. The room door was open and S11CNA was observed in Resident #R1's room from the hallway. Resident #R1 shared a room with one other resident, and Resident #R1's bed was located closest to the door/entrance into the room. The privacy curtains were not pulled between Resident #R1 and the door, or between the resident and his roommate who was awake watching television. Resident #R1 was in bed, brief exposed, and was removing his soiled shirt. On 08/13/2024 at 5:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11CNA. S11CNA confirmed the aforementioned observations. S11CNA confirmed she did not close the door or pull the privacy curtains in Resident #R1's room and he could be visualized during care to anyone who entered the room and to his roommate. S11CNA confirmed she did not close the door or pull the privacy curtains in Resident #2's room and she could be visualized during care to anyone who entered her room and to her roommate. 2. Resident #R5 Review of Resident #R5's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance and Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset. On 08/13/2024 at 5:33 a.m., an observation was made of S12CNA performing incontinence care for Resident #R5. Resident #R5 shared a room with one other resident, who was awake, alert and sitting in a wheelchair in the room. Further observation revealed there were no privacy curtain attached to the track on the ceiling. S12CNA provided incontinence care and dressed Resident #R5 with his roommate present in the room. On 08/13/2024 at 5:55 a.m., an interview was conducted with S12CNA. S12CNA stated Resident #R5 was incontinent. S12CNA confirmed there was no privacy curtain in Resident #R5's room. S12CNA stated the privacy curtain was taken down about one month ago to be washed and was never put back up. S12CNA confirmed there was no barrier to keep Resident #R5 from being visualized during care to anyone who entered his room or to his roommate who was in the room during the care provided. On 08/13/2024 at 6:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON was made aware of the above findings. S2DON stated for a residents' privacy, the CNAs should close the resident's room door and pull the privacy curtains prior to performing care. S2DON stated she would not expect staff to provide care with the residents' room door open, privacy curtains not pulled and the residents being visualized by their roommate. S2DON stated she was not aware the privacy curtain had been removed out of Resident #R5's room. S2DON stated S1ADM had been working with S13MS to get the facility's privacy curtains cleaned and replaced. On 08/13/2024 at 6:27 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM stated S13MS had been taking down, cleaning and rehanging the privacy curtains. S1ADM stated the facility was swapping out the old privacy curtains and replacing them with new ones. S1ADM stated if a resident did not have a privacy curtain in their room, staff should try and make it as private as possible. S1ADM stated the curtains were to provide privacy and dignity to the residents. S1ADM was made aware of the above findings. S1ADM stated the CNA should not have provided care to Resident #R5 where he was visible to his roommate. S1ADM stated the CNAs should pull the privacy curtains and close room doors prior to providing care to provide as much privacy as possible for the residents. On 08/13/2024 at 7:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S13MS. S13MS stated he took down and threw away Resident #R5's privacy curtain because it was dry rotted. S13MS stated he could not recall exactly when he took down Resident #R5's privacy curtain, but it had been more than one week ago.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out Activi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain good hygiene for 3 (#2, #R1, and #R3) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R3, and #R5) residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #2 and Resident #R1 received incontinence care timely; and 2. Resident #2 and #R3 received oral care daily. Findings: 1. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of UTI's and Cerebral Infarction. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/21/2024 revealed she had a BIMS of 6, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed she required substantial/maximum assistance for toileting. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: 03/27/2024: Toileting deficit: needs assistance related ho history of Cerebral Infarction. Is unaware of the urge to toilet. Interventions: Provide assist with toileting as needed; perineal care every 2 hours and as needed Problem: 03/27/2024: Self-care ADL deficit: needs assist with toileting, bathing and hygiene Interventions: Assist with hygiene Review of Resident #2's Physician Orders dated August 2024 revealed the following, in part: Start date: 03/26/2024. Incontinence care. Check for incontinence at least every 2 hours. Cleanse periarea/buttock with perifresh, pat dry, apply periguard as a preventative measure. On 08/13/2024 at 5:10 a.m., an observation was made of S11CNA performing incontinence care for Resident #2. S11CNA confirmed Resident #2's incontinence brief and incontinence pad were wet with urine. Resident #R1 Review of Resident #R1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-dominant Side. Review of Resident #R1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/06/2024 revealed Resident #R1 was always incontinent of urine. Further review revealed he required substantial/max assist with dressing, personal hygiene, transfers, and toilet transfers. Review of Resident #R1's Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: 01/11/2024: Resident will remain free of altered skin integrity. Interventions: Incontinence care: check for incontinence at least every 2 hours. Cleanse periarea/buttocks with Perifresh, pat dry. On 08/13/2024 at 5:02 a.m., an observation was made S11CNA performing care for Resident #R1. Resident #R1 was observed in bed removing his soiled shirt. S11CNA stated she had just completed changing Resident #R1's soiled brief. There was a strong urine odor in his room. S11CNA removed a wet pad from underneath the resident, along with his shirt and jacket, which S11CNA stated were soiled with urine. On 08/13/2024 at 5:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11CNA. S11CNA stated she worked 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. and was assigned to Resident #2 and Resident #R1. S11CNA stated the last time she rounded on her assigned resident's, including Resident #2 and Resident #R1 was around 1:00 a.m. S11CNA stated she was supposed to round on the resident's every 2 hours. On 08/13/2024 at 6:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON was made aware of the above findings. S2DON stated CNAs should round on the residents every 2 hours and as needed. S2DON stated she would not expect the CNAs to wait more than 3 hours to make rounds and provide incontinence care. 2. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Care: A.M. revealed the following, in part: Procedure: 6. If resident has teeth, proceed with oral hygiene. 7. If resident has had dentures soaking overnight, remove from denture cup, rinse in cool water. Have resident rinse mouth with water or mouthwash. A soft toothbrush can be used to stimulate gum and tongue circulation by gentle brushing. Insert the dentures. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Care: P.M. revealed the following, in part: Procedure: 9. If the resident has dentures, remove them. Clean the dentures appropriately. Provide water or mouthwash for resident to rinse mouth. Place resident's cleaned dentures in a covered denture cup of water with the resident's name on it. A soft toothbrush can be used to stimulate gum and tongue circulation by gentle brushing. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of UTI's and Cerebral Infarction. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/21/2024 revealed she had a BIMS of 6, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed she required partial/moderate assistance for oral hygiene. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: 03/27/2024: Self-care ADL deficit: needs assist with toileting, bathing and hygiene Interventions: Assist with hygiene Review of Resident #2's Resident Care Details dated from 07/17/2024-08/13/2024 revealed no oral care was documented on the dates of 07/27/2024, 07/28/2024, 07/30/2024-08/10/2024, and 08/13/2024. On 08/13/2024 at 10:34 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #2. She was oriented to person and place. She stated staff did not perform oral care to her daily. On 08/14/2024 at 11:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9CNA. She stated she worked the 6:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m. shift and was assigned to Resident #2 when she worked. She stated each CNA was responsible ensure oral care was performed on their assigned residents. She stated there was a place to document oral care in the kiosk system. She was notified of the findings on Resident #2's Detail Summary Sheet and stated if she did not document oral care on Resident #2, she did not do it. Resident #R3 Review of Resident #R3's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of UTI and Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. Review of Resident #R3's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/17/2024 revealed she had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed she required setup or clean-up assistance with oral care. Review of Resident #R3's Resident Care Details from 07/16/2024-08/13/2024 revealed no oral care was documented on the dates of 07/18/2024-07/22/2024, 07/24/2024-07/29/2024, and 07/31/2024-08/10/2024. On 08/13/2024 at 12:41 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #R3. She stated staff did not provide oral care to her daily. She stated she wore dentures, and had asked staff to clean them but they never did. She stated if she was given the supplies, she could clean them herself. She stated she did not eat with her dentures in place anymore and did not try to wear them unless she had a visitor because she did not want them to get dirty. At that time, upper and lower dentures were to be observed lying on her torso, and Resident #R3 was observed to not have any dentures in her mouth. On 08/14/2024 at 12:53 p.m., an interview was conducted with S8CNA. She stated she was assigned to Resident #R3 on several occasions. She stated she worked both the 6:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m. shift and the 2:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m. shift. She stated cleaning dentures was part of oral care and should be performed each morning and night. She confirmed she never cleaned Resident #R3's dentures. She was notified of the findings on Resident #R3's Detail Summary Sheet, and stated if she did not document oral care on Resident #R3, she did not do it. On 08/14/2024 at 2:03 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated oral care was part of the CNA's a.m. care they were to provide to their assigned residents. She stated oral care was to be performed daily and included cleaning resident's dentures. She stated she reviewed both Resident #2 and #R3's Resident Care Detail Sheets and confirmed oral care was not documented as being performed daily and should have been.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 4 (#2, #3, #R1 and #R3) of 9 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, and #R6) resident's reviewed in the sample. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care to Resident #3 and Resident #R3, who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP); and 2. Staff performed appropriate infection control practices, hand hygiene, and proper glove use for Resident #2 and Resident #R1 observed for incontinence care. Findings: 1. Review of the Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign posted on resident doors revealed the following, in part: Enhanced Barrier Precautions: Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following high-contact resident care activities. Dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: urinary catheter. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Paraplegia, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, and Urinary Tract Infection. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: 08/21/2021-Potential for UTI and/or complications related to use of Suprapubic Catheter Placement. Review of Resident #3's Physician Orders dated August 2024 revealed the following, in part: Order date: 05/02/2024-Enhanced Barrier Precautions utilized when performing high-contact resident care activities related to suprapubic catheter. On 08/13/2024 at 6:52 a.m., an observation was made of S2DON assessing Resident #3's suprapubic catheter and brief. S2DON did not don a gown prior to removing Resident #3's bed linens, unfastening her brief, and assessing the suprapubic catheter and brief. On 08/13/2024 at 7:00 a.m., an observation was made of S7CNA and S8CNA perform catheter care and pericare for Resident #3. S7CNA and S8CNA did not don a gown prior to performing catheter care and pericare for Resident #3. Immediately following Resident #3's catheter care and pericare an interview was conducted with S7CNA and S8CNA. S7CNA and S8CNA stated Resident #3 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. S7CNA and S8CNA confirmed they should have been wearing a gown while performing catheter care and pericare for Resident #3. Upon exiting Resident #3's room, a sign was observed on Resident #3's door, which read: Enhanced Barrier Precautions Providers and staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following high-contact resident care activities. Dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: urinary catheter. On 08/13/2024 at 7:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON stated Resident #3 had a suprapubic catheter and was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. S2DON stated staff should wear a gown and gloves when providing care for Resident #3. S2DON confirmed she did not don a gown prior to assessing Resident #3's suprapubic catheter and should have. Resident #R3 Review of Resident #R3's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of UTI and Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. Review of Resident #R3's Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: 03/14/2024- Altered skin integrity-has actual pressure ulcers as listed: Pressure injury to sacrum Intervention: Enhanced Barrier Precautions utilized when performing high-contact resident care activities related to stage 4 pressure injury. Review of Resident #R3's Physician Orders dated August 2024 revealed the following, in part: Enhanced Barrier Precautions utilized when performing high-contact resident care activities related to stage 4 pressure injury. On 08/14/2024 at 12:30 p.m., an observation was made of S10CNA performing catheter care and pericare for Resident #R3 with S2DON and S3CN. S10CNA did not don a gown prior to performing catheter care and pericare for Resident #R3. Upon exiting Resident #R3's room, a sign was observed on Resident #R3's door, which read: Enhanced Barrier Precautions Providers and staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following high-contact resident care activities. Dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: urinary catheter. On 08/14/2024 at 2:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with S10CNA. S10CNA confirmed she did not don a gown prior to performing catheter care and pericare for Resident #R3 and should have. She verified she was aware Resident #R3 was on EBP. She confirmed when a resident was on EBP, a gown and gloves needed to be worn when providing any kind of contact care to the resident. On 08/14/2024 at 12:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON and S3CN. S2DON and S3CN stated Resident #R3 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. S2DON and S3CN confirmed S10CNA should have worn a gown while performing catheter care and pericare for Resident #R3 and did not. 2. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Incontinence Care: Bladder revealed the following, in part: Procedure: 2. Perform handwashing or use alcohol gel. 8. Put on disposable gloves. 9. For female perineal care 10. For male perineal care 11. Remove and discard gloves. 12. Perform handwashing or use alcohol gel. Resident #R1 Review of Resident #R1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-dominant Side. On 08/13/2024 at 5:02 a.m., an observation was made of S11CNA performing care for Resident #R1. S11CNA was observed in Resident #R1's room wearing gloves and holding a shirt. Resident #R1 was observed in bed, wearing a clean brief and removing his soiled shirt. S11CNA stated she had already changed Resident #R1's soiled brief. A strong urine odor was noted. S11CNA removed a wet pad from underneath the resident, along with his shirt and jacket, which S11CNA stated were soiled with urine. While wearing soiled gloves, S11CNA was observed placing the soiled pad and clothing on the floor, assisted Resident #R1 to put on a clean shirt, repositioned him in bed, repositioned the bed linens, pulled the string to turn off the light, grabbed the bedside table of Resident #R1's roommate and moved it next to the roommates bed, picked up the soiled linens and bag of trash, walked out of the room into the hallway, opened the lid to the yellow soiled linen barrel, placed the soiled clothing inside, walked down the hall, removed the soiled gloves and placed the bag of trash and gloves in the grey trash barrel and replaced the lid. S11CNA did not perform hand hygiene, and walked down the hall toward Resident #2's room. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of UTI's and Cerebral Infarction. On 08/13/2024 at 5:10 a.m., an observation was made of S11CNA performing incontinence care for Resident #2. Without performing hand hygiene, S11CNA was observed entering Resident #2's room, and turned on the light above the bed. S11CNA applied a pair of clean gloves, and was observed pulling back Resident #2's bed linens and unfastened her brief. Resident #2 turned to her right side. S11CNA touched the pad underneath Resident #2 and stated it was wet with urine. S11CNA removed the glove from her left hand, opened the room door, exited the room, removed a pink pad from the clean linen cart in the hall, and reentered Resident #2 room. S11CNA applied a clean glove to her left hand, placed a clean pad and clean brief underneath Resident #2. S11CNA used a perineal wipe to clean the resident's buttocks and perineal area, Resident #2 turned on her back, S11CNA cleansed the resident with a perineal wipe, fastened the left side of the clean brief, the resident turned on her left side, S11CNA fastened the right side of the clean brief, and removed the soiled pad and brief. Without removing her gloves or performing hand hygiene, S11CNA adjusted Resident #2's gown and bedside table. S11CNA removed her soiled gloves, applied clean gloves, repositioned the bed linen, picked up a remote and adjusted the bed, picked up the bag of trash and soiled linen, took off her right glove, walked into the hallway, opened the lid on the yellow linen barrel and placed the soiled linen, walked down the hall, opened the lid on the grey trash barrel, placed the bag of trash and gloves, and replaced the lid. S11CNA did not perform hand hygiene, applied a pair of clean gloves and walked down the hall. On 08/13/2024 at 5:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11CNA. S11CNA stated hand hygiene should be performed in between resident rooms. S11CNA stated she performed hand hygiene and changed gloves depending on the situation, and what resident care she was providing. S11CNA confirmed the aforementioned observations. On 08/13/2024 at 6:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON was made aware of the above findings. S2DON stated CNAs should perform hand hygiene before providing care, when going from dirty to clean, and at the end of care. S2DON stated CNAs should not touch items in a resident's room with soiled gloves or prior to performing hand hygiene.
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff accurately documented Resident #3's bowel movements. Findings: Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed an admit date of 04/24/2024. Review of Resident #3's ADL Resident Care Details dated 07/19/2024 to 07/22/2024 and signed by S2CNAS revealed the following, in part: Has the resident had a bowel movement? Task Date/Time: Documentation Date/Time: Answer: 07/19/2024 2:00 p.m. 07/23/2024 11:34 a.m. Yes 07/20/2024 6:00 a.m. 07/23/2024 12:01 p.m. Yes 07/20/2024 2:00 p.m. 07/23/2024 11:57 a.m. Yes 07/21/2024 6:00 a.m. 07/23/2024 11:52 a.m. Yes 07/21/2024 2:00 p.m. 07/23/2024 11:47 a.m. Yes 07/21/2024 10:00 p.m. 07/23/2024 11:46 a.m. Yes 07/22/2024 6:00 a.m. 07/23/2024 11:44 a.m. Yes 07/22/2024 2:00 p.m. 07/23/2024 11:40 a.m. Yes 07/22/2024 10:00 p.m. 07/23/2024 11:34 a.m. Yes On 07/23/2024 at 10:45 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #3. He was lying in bed with a colostomy bag observed. He stated he emptied his own colostomy bag with the CNA's assistance. On 07/23/2024 at 3:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2CNAS. She stated CNA's should complete ADL documentation prior to the end of each shift; including bowel movements and colostomy output. She stated documentation had been an ongoing issue with the CNA's. S2CNAS stated Resident #3 had a colostomy. She reviewed Resident #3's ADL Resident Care Details, dated 07/19/2024 to 07/22/2024. S2CNAS confirmed she documented Resident #3's missing bowel movement entries from 07/19/2024 to 07/22/2024 today, 07/24/2024. S2CNAS confirmed she did not contact the CNA's who worked the undocumented shifts prior to adding documentation of Resident #3's bowel movements. She confirmed Resident #3's bowel movements were not accurately documented and should have been. On 07/24/2024 at 2:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. She stated CNA's should complete ADL documentation prior to the end of each shift; including bowel movements and colostomy output. She stated documentation had been an ongoing issue with the CNA's. She stated Resident #3 had a colostomy. She reviewed the ADL Resident Care Details dated 07/19/2024 to 07/22/2024 for Resident #3. S1DON confirmed S2CNAS added documentation of Resident #3's bowel movements from 07/19/2024 to 07/22/2024 on today, 07/24/2024. S1DON stated she would not expect S2CNAS to document unconfirmed information in a resident's clinical record, including bowel movements, without first verifying the information was accurate.
Jun 2024 4 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's significant change in status was reported to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's significant change in status was reported to the physician for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents reviewed for notification of change. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on [DATE] at approximately 1:12 p.m. for Resident #1, a resident requiring mechanical lift with 2 person assistance for transfers, when S8CNA transferred the resident without another staff member's assistance. The transfer resulted in Resident #1 falling from the lift to the floor. On [DATE] from 1:48 p.m. to 1:53p.m., Resident #1 told S5CNA, S6CNA and S7CNA, I am going to die and showed symptoms of increased anxiety. None of the CNAs reported this to the nurse. Resident #1 was found unresponsive at 1:55 p.m., CPR initiated, and transferred to the hospital via emergency transportation. Resident #1 expired in the hospital at 2:24 p.m. from cardiac arrest. The facility implemented corrective actions, which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. S1ADM was notified of the Past Noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Lack of Coordination, Contracture of Right and Left Hand, Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, Generalized Pain, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Schizoaffective Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Severe Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder with Psych Symptoms, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #1's MDS with an ARD of [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 10, which indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 had speech difficulty with communicating some words or finishing thoughts, and if prompted or given time, made herself understood. Review of Resident #1's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: [DATE] Mood Disorder related to diagnosis of Depression, Schizophrenia, and Anxiety. Intervention: Assess for changes in mood status. Review of the facility's Investigation Report dated [DATE] at 1:05 a.m. revealed: S8CNA transferred Resident #1 by herself with the mechanical lift. Resident #1 fell from the lift and landed with her shoulders/back on the leg of the lift. S8CNA immediately called for assistance, and nurses assessed Resident #1. At that time, the only complaint Resident #1 had was she felt she had cracked some ribs. Resident #1 maintained her normal faculties and was able to appropriately, answer all questions. Approximately forty minutes later, S2DON made a round on Resident #1 and found her to be unresponsive. At that time, CPR was started and Resident #1 was taken to a local hospital for evaluation and treatment. Review of the facility's surveillance video footage on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m. with S1ADM and S2DON revealed the following: Date: [DATE] 1:48 p.m. S6CNA entered Resident #1's room. 1:49 p.m. S6CNA exited Resident #1's room. 1:50 p.m. S7CNA and S5CNA entered Resident #1's room. 1:52 p.m. S7CNA and S5CNA exited Resident #1's room. 1:52 p.m. S5CNA re-entered Resident #1's room. 1:53 p.m. S5CNA exited Resident #1's room. 1:55 p.m. S2DON entered Resident #1's room and Resident #1 was found unresponsive. Review of the hospital's Emergency Department Provider's Notes for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 2:31 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Resident #1 was a level 1 trauma activation after a fall and cardiac arrest in the field per ambulance, Resident #1 had a fall at her nursing home and was transported back to her room. Approximately 15 minutes later, she was found pulseless. Ambulance arrived and performed ACLS with 3 rounds of Epinephrine and pulseless electrical activity consistently. Resident #1 arrived with supraglottic airway in place and compressions being performed. Total time of ACLS prior to arrival 35 minutes. At that time bedside cardiac ultrasound showed no cardiac activity, patient's pupils were fixed and dilated, no spontaneous breathing noted, no pulses palpable. Time of death called on [DATE] at 2:24 p.m. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 8:27 a.m. with S8CNA. She stated, on [DATE], during transfer of Resident #1 with the mechanical lift, the resident fell from the lift. S8CNA stated, after the fall, Resident #1 was agitated and anxious, but easily consoled. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 9:46 a.m. with S6CNA. S6CNA stated, on [DATE] Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift. S6CNA stated at 1:48 p.m., Resident #1 said she fell off the mechanical lift and thought her ribs were broken. The resident then stated, I think I am going to die. S6CNA stated Resident #1 was hyperventilating and seemed anxious. S6CNA stated she did not report the resident's statement or appearance to the nurse. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 11:26 a.m. with S7CNA. S7CNA stated, on [DATE], Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift. S7CNA stated at 1:50 p.m., she checked on Resident #1, and when she entered the room, Resident #1 looked panicked. S7CNA stated Resident #1 said her ribs were broken, call my sister, and I am about to die. S7CNA stated she did not report Resident #1's statement or appearance to the nurse. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 2:52 p.m. with S5CNA. S5CNA stated, on [DATE], Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift. S5CNA stated at 1:50 p.m., she checked on Resident #1, and when she entered the room, Resident #1 was nervous and fidgety and asking to call her sister. S5CNA stated she tried to calm Resident #1 down and was unsuccessful. S5CNA stated Resident #1 said, I am about to die, I am about to die. S5CNA stated at 1:52 p.m., she reentered Resident #1's room and the resident was screaming call my sister, call my sister. She stated she did not report Resident #1's statements or appearance to the nurse. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 11:08 a.m. with S16RN. S16RN stated she was made aware Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift soon after the incident happened. S16RN stated she did not receive report Resident #1 was showing signs of increased anxiety and difficult to calm or that Resident #1 was saying I am about to die. S16RN stated if a resident stated to a CNA I am about to die, she would expect the CNA to report it to the nurse immediately. She confirmed she would have assessed the resident and contacted the doctor had she known. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 1:16 p.m. with S3LPN. S3LPN stated, on [DATE], Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift. S3LPN stated when she got to Resident #1's room, the resident was on the floor. S3LPN stated Resident #1 complained of pain to her upper back at first and then her right flank area. S3LPN stated she did not receive report from nursing staff that Resident #1 had increased anxiety and was difficult to calm or that Resident #1 was saying I am about to die. S3LPN confirmed she would have contacted the doctor had she known. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 11:07 a.m. with S12NP. S12NP stated Resident #1 was cognitive and able to communicate her needs. S12NP stated, on [DATE] at 1:15 p.m., she was notified Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift and complained of back pain. S12NP said she was again contacted on [DATE] at 1:40 p.m. about Resident #1's complaint of rib pain. S12NP stated she was not notified of Resident #1's increased anxiety, hyperventilation, inability to be calmed, or the resident's statements that she thought she was going to die. She stated she received a text on [DATE] at 1:56 p.m. reporting Resident #1 was receiving CPR. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 3:14 p.m. with S2DON. S2DON stated, on [DATE], she was made aware Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift. S2DON stated she entered Resident #1's room at 1:55 p.m. and found her with eyes open, agonal breathing and a faint, thready pulse. S2DON stated Resident #1 was unresponsive. S2DON stated she started CPR. S2DON stated if a resident were to state to staff I am about to die, she would expect the staff to notify the nurse immediately. S2DON stated she started the plan of correction immediately on [DATE] after the incident with Resident #1. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: 1. Resident #1 was sent out to local hospital for evaluation and treatment on [DATE]. 2. A root cause analysis and 5 Whys was completed by the Administrator/DON on [DATE] to help identify the reason for the employee non-compliance. 3. Lift and lift pad were both checked by DON on [DATE] after the incident - no issues noted with lift and the lift pad was in good repair. 4. S8CNA was immediately pulled from the section on [DATE]. She gave a statement and was sent home pending investigation. 5. A list of Physician Orders were printed to determine lift status for all residents. All residents who require assistance via lifts have the potential to be affected on [DATE]. 6. All lifts were immediately taken out of service on [DATE] by DON/Maintenance until re-education and lift check-offs of present staff were completed. 7. No staff were allowed to use a lift until after education and check-off by DON/nursing administration. 8. The lift competency check-off created by Central Management (and a part of orientation) was used to re-educate staff beginning [DATE]. A post-test was created from the check-off, and was utilized to help ensure understanding. 9. Throughout the evening of [DATE] and the weekend of [DATE] through [DATE], the Administrative Nursing staff came to the facility to re-educate, test, and check-off all CNA, LPN, and RN prior to using a lift to ensure compliance. Return demonstrations were observed on all above-listed staff. Hours were staggered by the Nursing Administration to ensure supervisor and training on all shifts. 10. A new protocol by DON/nursing administration was implemented on [DATE] that all lifts must be completed with at least 3 certified/licensed/registered staff members (and 2 CNAs must have an LPN or RN present to perform a lift transfer) to ensure compliance with protocol. 11. Effective [DATE], the hall LPNs were required to sit on the hall to do documentation to help ensure availability and accessibility during transfers if needed. 12. All lifts and lift pads were inspected on [DATE] by mechanical lift medical supply company- no issues noted with lift operability or lift pads. One lift did have a part ordered and was taken out of commission until [DATE] to ensure maximum safety. 13. All wall care plans were checked by MDS on [DATE] to ensure that transfer status was correct for each resident. 14. Monitors were implemented beginning [DATE] by Nursing Administration to help ensure lifts were being done per care plan and safely. Re-educated provided as needed. 15. An in-service staff on the reporting of changes of resident condition was begun on [DATE] in regards to a different matter, but was applicable to this plan of correction also. 16. A multifaceted monitor on nurse's notes, treatment notes, physician orders, incident/accidents, and verbal notifications was put into place to help ensure the reporting of potential changes of resident status. This was implemented on [DATE]. 17. A QAPI monitor had been developed to ensure that lift transfers were done correctly and per care plan. This monitor was to be performed twice weekly for 6 weeks on a random sample by the DON or their designee, and then monthly thereafter until compliance was maintained. 18. Effectiveness of the corrective actions will be discussed weekly for 6 weeks at the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Meeting with findings added to the QAPI minutes. Additional in-services and/or corrective actions will be implemented as needed. 19. Date of completion [DATE].
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents, who required two person assistance with mechani...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents, who required two person assistance with mechanical lift transfers, remained free of accident hazards for 1 (#1) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) residents reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on [DATE] at approximately 1:12 p.m. for Resident #1, a resident requiring mechanical lift with 2 person assistance for transfers, when S8CNA transferred the resident without another staff member's assistance. The transfer resulted in Resident #1 falling from the lift to the floor. Resident #1 was found unresponsive at 1:45 p.m., CPR initiated, and transferred to the hospital via emergency transportation. Resident #1 expired in the hospital at 2:24 p.m. from cardiac arrest. The facility implemented corrective actions, which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. S1ADM was notified of the Past Noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy Hydraulic Lift revealed the following, in part: Policy: The hydraulic lift is a mechanical device used to transfer a resident from and to the bed and chair. Require two or three staff members to operate and accomplish the transfer. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Lack of Coordination, Contracture of Right and Left Hand and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. Review of Resident #1's most recent MDS with an ARD of [DATE] revealed Resident #1 required two-person staff assistance for transfers. Review of Resident #1's current Care Plan revealed: Problem: Self -care ADL deficit: dependent upon staff for transfers related to Bilateral Hand Contractures and limited range of motion due to multiple muscles in bilateral lower extremities and bilateral upper extremities. Intervention: [DATE]- Use mechanical lift for transfers times 2 person Review of Resident #1's current Physician Orders revealed, in part: [DATE] Resident requires 2 person assist with transfers, uses a mechanical lift. Review of the facility's surveillance video footage on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m. with S1ADM and S2DON revealed the following: Date: [DATE] 1:12 p.m., S8CNA transported Resident #1 via geriatric chair into her room. 1:16 p.m., S8CNA retrieved a mechanical lift and entered Resident #1's room alone. No other staff member was seen to enter Resident #1's room with S8CNA. 1:19 p.m., S9CNA was in the hallway by Resident #1's door and S8CNA stepped into the hallway to talk to S9CNA. 1:21 p.m., S3LPN, S9CNA, S2DON and other nursing staff entered Resident #1's room. 1:55 p.m., S2DON entered Resident #1's room. Review of the facility's Investigation Report dated [DATE] at 1:05 p.m. revealed: S8CNA transferred Resident #1 by herself with the mechanical lift. Resident #1 fell from the lift and landed with her shoulders/back on the leg of the lift. S8CNA immediately called for assistance, and nurses assessed Resident #1. At that time, the only complaint Resident #1 had was she felt she had cracked some ribs. Resident #1 maintained her normal faculties and was able to appropriately, answer all questions. Approximately forty minutes later, S2DON made a round on Resident #1 and found her to be unresponsive. At that time, CPR was started and Resident #1 was taken to a local hospital for evaluation and treatment. Review of the facility's written staff member statements revealed the following: Staff member: S8CNA. Staff Statement on the fall that occurred on [DATE]: After lunch when I was making my last round I went to get Resident #1 to put her in bed before I went home. When I rolled Resident #1 into the room I went to get the lift from down the hallway and didn't see anyone. When I went back to Resident #1's room, I hooked her up to the lift and lifted her up and that's when the lift bars were tilted, and Resident #1 was leaning sideways on the lift pad. I put her back into her Geri chair and tried to fix the lift pad under her correctly. When I lifted her out of her chair and pulled the lift from under it, Resident #1 said she was falling. That is when Resident #1 slid out of the side of the lift pad on the right and hit her side on the legs of the lift. Review of the [DATE] Nurse's Notes for Resident #1 revealed the following: [DATE] at 1:34 p.m.-1:15 p.m. S3LPN was called to Resident #1's room by S9CNA, and observed Resident #1 lying supine with her head on the feet on the mechanical lift and lower extremities on the floor. Resident #1 complained of pain to the sacrum, back and right flank. S12NP gave an order to send the resident to the local hospital for evaluation. At 1:45 p.m. nursing staff was summoned to Resident #1's room due to Resident #1 becoming unresponsive. Nursing staff and administration begun CPR efforts. At 1:51 p.m., the ambulance arrived on scene and continued CPR. At 1:58 p.m. Resident #1 was intubated, no pulse. At 2:00 p.m. Resident #1 exited facility via ambulance for local hospital. Signed by S3LPN. Review of the hospital's Emergency Department Provider's Notes for Resident #1 dated [DATE] at 2:31 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Resident #1 was a level 1 trauma activation after a fall and cardiac arrest in the field. Per ambulance Resident #1 had a fall at her nursing home and was transported back to her room. Approximately 15 minutes later she was found pulseless. Ambulance arrived and performed ACLS with 3 rounds of Epinephrine and pulseless electrical activity consistently. Resident #1 arrived with supraglottic airway in place and compressions being performed. Total time of ACLS prior to arrival 35 minutes. At that time bedside cardiac ultrasound showed no cardiac activity, patient's pupils were fixed and dilated, no spontaneous breathing noted, no pulses palpable. Time of death called on [DATE] at 2:24 p.m. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 8:27 a.m. with S8CNA. She stated on [DATE] she transported Resident #1 via geriatric chair to her room. S8CNA stated she then retrieved the mechanical lift and pushed it to Resident #1's room. S8CNA stated during transfer of Resident #1 with the mechanical lift, Resident #1 slipped out of the lift pad and fell on top of the legs of the lift hitting her right flank. She stated she did not ask for help with the mechanical lift transfer and transferred Resident #1 without assistance. S8CNA stated she knew she was supposed to use two person assistance with the lift. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 11:37 a.m. with S13CNAS. She stated she required the CNA's to use two person assistance with all mechanical lift transfers. She stated S8CNA should have had another staff member to assist her with the mechanical lift transfer with Resident #1. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 2:18 p.m. with S2DON. S2DON stated she was made aware of the incident with S8CNA and Resident #1 on [DATE]. She stated the facility's policy had always been two person assistance with a mechanical lift transfer. She stated she would expect all mechanical lift transfers to be completed with two staff members. She stated S8CNA was suspended and sent home immediately after the incident with Resident #1. S2DON stated she started the plan of correction immediately after the incident with Resident #1 on [DATE]. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: 1. Resident #1 was sent out to local hospital for evaluation and treatment on [DATE]. 2. A root cause analysis and 5 Whys was completed by the Administrator/DON on [DATE] to help identify the reason for the employee non-compliance. 3. Lift and lift pad were both checked by DON on [DATE] after the incident - no issues noted with lift and the lift pad was in good repair. 4. S8CNA was immediately pulled from the section on [DATE]. She gave a statement and was sent home pending investigation. 5. A list of Physician Orders were printed to determine lift status for all residents. All residents who require assistance via lifts have the potential to be affected on [DATE]. 6. All lifts were immediately taken out of service on [DATE] by DON/Maintenance until re-education and lift check-offs of present staff were completed. 7. No staff were allowed to use a lift until after education and check-off by DON/nursing administration. 8. The lift competency check-off created by Central Management (and a part of orientation) was used to re-educate staff beginning [DATE]. A post-test was created from the check-off, and was utilized to help ensure understanding. 9. Throughout the evening of [DATE] and the weekend of [DATE] through [DATE], the Administrative Nursing staff came to the facility to re-educate, test, and check-off all CNA, LPN, and RN prior to using a lift to ensure compliance. Return demonstrations were observed on all above-listed staff. Hours were staggered by the Nursing Administration to ensure supervisor and training on all shifts. 10. A new protocol by DON/nursing administration was implemented on [DATE] that all lifts must be completed with at least 3 certified/licensed/registered staff members (and 2 CNAs must have an LPN or RN present to perform a lift transfer) to ensure compliance with protocol. 11. Effective [DATE], the hall LPNs were required to sit on the hall to do documentation to help ensure availability and accessibility during transfers if needed. 12. All lifts and lift pads were inspected on [DATE] by mechanical lift medical supply company- no issues noted with lift operability or lift pads. One lift did have a part ordered and was taken out of commission until [DATE] to ensure maximum safety. 13. All wall care plans were checked by MDS on [DATE] to ensure that transfer status was correct for each resident. 14. Monitors were implemented beginning [DATE] by Nursing Administration to help ensure lifts were being done per care plan and safely. Re-educated provided as needed. 15. An in-service staff on the reporting of changes of resident condition was begun on [DATE] in regards to a different matter, but was applicable to this plan of correction also. 16. A multifaceted monitor on nurse's notes, treatment notes, physician orders, incident/accidents, and verbal notifications was put into place to help ensure the reporting of potential changes of resident status. This was implemented on [DATE]. 17. A QAPI monitor had been developed to ensure that lift transfers were done correctly and per care plan. This monitor was to be performed twice weekly for 6 weeks on a random sample by the DON or their designee, and then monthly thereafter until compliance was maintained. 18. Effectiveness of the corrective actions will be discussed weekly for 6 weeks at the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Meeting with findings added to the QAPI minutes. Additional in-services and/or corrective actions will be implemented as needed. 19. Date of completion will be [DATE].
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#2) of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) residents reviewed in the sample. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was transferred properly using the mechanical lift with two person assistance. Findings: Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Dysphagia Following Other Cerebrovascular Incident, Hemiplegia Following Cerebral Infraction Affect Right Dominate Side, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Acquired Absence of Left Leg Above Knee, and Contracture Right Wrist. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with ARD 03/14/2024, revealed she had a BIMS of 01, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance/two person assist with transfers. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan dated 02/27/2023 revealed Resident #2 required two person assist for transfers with mechanical lift. An interview was conducted with S4LPN on 06/20/2024 at 2:38 p.m. S4LPN stated the communication sheet posted on wall next to resident's bed indicated Resident #2 was a two person mechanical lift for transfers. S4LPN stated she was called to Resident #2's room by S9CNA. S4LPN stated Resident #2 was lying on left side of bed on floor when she entered the room. S4LPN stated she and S9CNA physically picked Resident #2 up and transferred her back into her bed. S4LPN stated the mechanical lift was not used to transfer Resident #2 her back in bed. An interview was conducted with S9CNA 0n 06/24/2024 at 11:55 a.m. S9CNA stated on 06/08/2024 she and S4LPN physically picked up Resident #2 after she had a fall from her bed and placed her back in the bed. S9CNA stated she did not lift Resident #2 with the mechanical lift. An interview was conducted with S10CNA on 06/24/2024 at 1:50 p.m. S10CNA stated Resident #2 was care planned as a shower per shower chair. She stated she gave her a shower on a Saturday, 06/10/2024 after resident injured her right leg. She stated she sat Resident #2 on the side of bed and physically lifted and transferred her to the shower chair. She stated she did not transfer Resident #2 with the mechanical lift. An interview was conducted with S2DON on 06/25/2024 at 9:09 a.m. She stated on 06/08/2024 she received a phone call from S4LPN to inform her Resident #2 had a near fall from her bed and received a skin tear to her right shin. She confirmed Resident #2 was care planned as a two person mechanical lift for transfers. She stated she would expect all mechanical lifts to be completed with two staff members. She confirmed Resident #2 was lifted with the mechanical lift on 06/08/2024 and 06/10/2024 with one person assistance. She further confirmed per Resident #2's care plan and facility's policy Resident #2 should have been transferred with two person assistance mechanical lift and was not.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect resulting in serious bodily injur...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect resulting in serious bodily injury was reported immediately, but no later than two hours to the facility Administrator and to the State Survey Agency for 2 (#1 and #2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents sampled for allegations of neglect. Findings: IV. Reporting Requirements: Nursing facility must report to the state agency any incidents and allegations of neglect immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made if the event that caused the allegation involves abuse or results bodily harm or injury. Review of Resident #1's Incident Report dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: Date Entered: [DATE] at 3:03 p.m. Date Occurred: [DATE] at 1:05 p.m. Date Discovered: [DATE] at 1:05 p.m. Resident Victim: Resident #1 Accused: S8CNA Accused Allegations: Neglect Narrative: On [DATE] at approximately 1:05 p.m., S8CNA transferred Resident #1 by herself with the mechanical lift. Resident #1 fell from the lift. Approximately forty minutes later, S2DON made a round on Resident #1 and found her to be unresponsive. At that time, CPR was started and Resident #1 was taken to local hospital for evaluation and treatment. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 2:18 p.m. with S2DON. S2DON stated she was made aware of the incident with S8CNA and Resident #1 on [DATE] at 1:21p.m. Review of the facility's video footage revealed S1ADM entered Resident #1's room at 1:38 p.m. Resident #2: Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Resident #2's Incident report dated [DATE] revealed the following, in part: Dated Entered: [DATE] at 11:32 a.m. Date Discovered: [DATE] at 4:38 p.m. Resident Victim: Resident #2 Accused: S10CNA Accused Allegations: Neglect Narrative: Resident #2 had a witnessed fall from bed during care by S10CNA on [DATE] at approximately 7:30 p.m. While rolling the resident onto her side to change bedding, the resident rolled from the bed and struck her knee on the bedside table. S10CNA stated resident was then lowered to the floor. A skin tear was noted by S4LPN and dressed. After the incident, no additional pain was noted through the weekend. On [DATE], resident had bruising to leg and knee and seemed to be in some pain upon assessment. X-rays were ordered which revealed a proximal fracture to the tibia/fibula. The resident was sent out to the hospital for evaluation and treatment on [DATE] at 6:01p.m. An interview was conducted with S1ADM on [DATE] at 12:20 p.m. S1ADM stated he was responsible for reporting all incidents involving neglect to the state. S1ADM stated he was present in the facility at the time of Resident #1's incident and was notified immediately after her fall on [DATE] at approximately 1:05 p.m. He confirmed he reported the incident to the state on [DATE] at 3:03 p.m. He stated he was made aware of Resident #2's witnessed fall on [DATE]. He confirmed he discovered Resident #2 had a tibia/fibula fracture on [DATE]. S1ADM said he reported an allegation of neglect to the state on [DATE] at 11:32 a.m. He further confirmed allegations of neglect with serious bodily injury should be reported to the state survey agency within 2 hours.
Jan 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

MDS Data Transmission (Tag F0640)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to transmit MDS assessments in the required timeframe for 2 (#49 and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to transmit MDS assessments in the required timeframe for 2 (#49 and #80) of 2 (#49 and #80) residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. Findings: Resident #49 Review of Residents #49's Discharge MDS with an ARD of 10/06/2023 revealed the MDS assessment was open and had not been transmitted to CMS. Resident #80 Review of Resident #80's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/16/2023 revealed the MDS assessment was closed but not transmitted to CMS. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 11:00 a.m. with S5MDS. She confirmed Resident #49's Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] was open and not transmitted to CMS and should have been. She confirmed it was missed over when the other assessments were transmitted. She confirmed Resident #80's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted to CMS and should have been. She said she was unsure of the reason why Resident #80's assessment had not been transmitted. She said she was responsible for ensuring resident MDS assessment transmissions were completed, passed CMS standard edits and were accepted into the system timely.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person centered care plan to meet a resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person centered care plan to meet a resident's needs for 1 (#11) of 3 (#3, #11 and #89) residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 received a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week as ordered by the Physician. Findings: Review of Resident #11's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Paranoid Schizophrenia, Bipolar II Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Morbid Obesity, Urinary Tract Infections, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/26/2023 revealed she had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #11's Physician's Orders dated January 2024 revealed the following, in part: Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath two times a week, leave on for 2 minutes, then rinse off. Review of Resident #11's Nurses' Notes dated January 2024 revealed no documentation she had received or refused a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. An interview was conducted on 01/29/2024 at 10:00 a.m. with Resident #11. She said she never received a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. She said she was unaware she should be receiving a bath twice a week with Chlorhexidine Gluconate. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:00 p.m. with S7CNA. She said she was assigned to Resident #11. She said she was unaware Resident #11 should receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she had never given Resident #11 a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:10 p.m. with S4LPN. She said she was assigned to Resident #11. She said she was unaware Resident #11 should receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she never assisted Resident #11 with a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:20 p.m. with S6CNAS. She said she provided care to Resident #11. She said she sometimes assisted with Resident #11's bed bath. She said she was unaware Resident #11 had a Physician's Order to receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she never gave Resident #11 a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:55 p.m. with S8CNA. She said she provided care to Resident #11 and was assigned to her today. She said she was unaware Resident #11 had a Physician's Order to receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she never gave Resident #11 a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 1:40 p.m. with S3LPN. She said she provided care to Resident #11. She said she was unaware Resident #11 should receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she never assisted Resident #11 with a bed bath using Chlorhexidine Gluconate. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 4:00 p.m. with S2CN. She reviewed Resident #11's Physician Orders and confirmed she should receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said it was the responsibility of S9DON and S6CNAS to ensure CNA staff were aware of the Physician Ordered bed bath and it was carried out as ordered.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet quality professional standar...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet quality professional standards for 1 (#11) of 3 (#3, #11 and #89) residents reviewed. The facility failed to accurately document Resident #11's Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath had been performed per Physician's Order. Findings: Review of Resident #11's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Paranoid Schizophrenia, Bipolar II Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Morbid Obesity, Urinary Tract Infections, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Resident #11's current Physician's Orders dated January 2024 revealed the following, in part: Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath two times a week, leave on for 2 minutes, then rinse off. Review of Resident #11's Medication Administration Record for January 2024 revealed the following, in part: Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath two times a week, leave on for 2 minutes, then rinse off. A check mark with initials, which indicated a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath had been performed on Resident #11 on the following dates: 01/01/2024, 01/05/2024, 01/08/2024, 01/12/2024, 01/15/2024 and 01/29/2024 by S4LPN. A check mark with initials, which indicated a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath had been performed on Resident #11 on 01/22/2024 by S3LPN. An interview was conducted on 01/29/2024 at 10:00 a.m. with Resident #11. She said she never received a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. She said she was unaware she should be receiving a bath twice a week with Chlorhexidine Gluconate. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:00 p.m. with S7CNA. She said she was assigned to Resident #11. She said she was unaware Resident #11 should receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she had never given Resident #11 a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:55 p.m. with S8CNA. She said she provided care to Resident #11 and was assigned to her today. She said she was unaware Resident #11 had a Physician's Order to receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she never gave Resident #11 a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:20 p.m. with S6CNAS. She said she provided care to Resident #11. She said she sometimes assisted with Resident #11's bed bath. She said she was unaware Resident #11 had a Physician's Order to receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she never gave Resident #11 a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 3:20 p.m. with S4LPN. She said she was assigned to Resident #11. She said she was unaware Resident #11 should receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she never assisted Resident #11 with a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. She verified she initialed the Medication Administration Record indicating Resident #11 was to receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath on 01/01/02024, 01/05/2024, 01/08/2024, 01/12/2024, 01/15/2024 and 01/29/2024. She said she initialed it as being done but did not verify Resident #11 actually received the Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 3:30 p.m. with S3LPN. She said she provided care to Resident #11. She said she was unaware Resident #11 should receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath twice a week. She said she never assisted Resident #11 with a bed bath using Chlorhexidine Gluconate. She verified she initialed the Medication Administration Record indicating Resident #11 was to receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath on 01/22/2023. She said she initialed it as being done but did not verify Resident #11 actually received a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath that day. She said it was one of those areas on the Medication Administration Record you just click. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 4:00 p.m. with S2CN. She reviewed Resident #11's Physician Orders and confirmed she should receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath two times a week. She said S3LPN signed the Medication Administration Record indicating Resident #11 was to receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath on 01/22/2023 and S3LPN signed the Medication Administration Record indicating Resident #11 was to receive a Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed bath on 01/01/02024, 01/05/2024, 01/08/2024, 01/12/2024, 01/15/2024 and 01/29/2024. She said S3LPN and S4LPN should not have signed the Medication Administration Record indicating the Chlorhexidine Gluconate bed baths had been completed if they did not verify they had been completed. She said it was the responsibility of the S9DON and S6CNAS to ensure all staff were aware of Physician Orders and that they are carried out as ordered.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 (#11) of 3 (#3, #11 and #89) residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings: Review of Resident #11's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Paranoid Schizophrenia, Bipolar II Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Morbid Obesity, Urinary Tract Infections, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/26/2023 revealed she had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed she required maximum assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #11's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: Resident needs extensive assistance with bathing and hygiene. Interventions: Bathe per schedule. Review of Resident #11's Bath Schedule provided by the facility revealed she had baths scheduled three times weekly on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Review of the Bath Documentation for Resident #11 dated January 2024 revealed she had not received a bath from 01/21/2024 until 01/30/2024. Review of Resident #11's Nurses Notes dated January 2024 revealed no documentation she received or had refused baths. An interview was conducted on 01/29/2024 at 10:00 a.m. with Resident #11. She said she had not received a bed bath in over a week. She said she should receive a bed bath on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. She said she waited for the CNA staff to provide a bath to her each day but they had not. She said the last time she received a bed bath was two Saturdays ago. Resident #11 said she would like to receive a bath three days a week as scheduled. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:00 p.m. with S7CNA. She said she was assigned to Resident #11. She said Resident #11 required maximum assistance with bed baths. She said Resident #11 should receive a bed bath on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. She said Resident #11 had never refused a bath. She said she provided care to Resident #11 last week but did not give her a bath. She confirmed Resident #11 was not capable of providing her own bath. She said the CNA staff on the hall were responsible for bathing residents. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:10 p.m. with S4LPN. She said she was assigned to Resident #11. She said Resident #11 required maximum assistance with bed baths. She said Resident #11 should receive a bed bath on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. She said Resident #11 had never refused a bath. She said she was unsure if Resident #11 received a bath last week and yesterday. She confirmed Resident #11 was not capable of providing her own bath. She said it was the responsibility of the assigned CNA to bathe Resident #11. She confirmed no staff had reported to her Resident #11 refused any ADLs. She said if the CNA had reported a refusal to her, she would have documented it in the Nurses' Notes. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:20 p.m. with S6CNAS. She said she provided care to Resident #11. She said Resident #11 should receive a bed bath on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. She confirmed Resident #11 was not capable of providing her own bath. She said she was unaware Resident #11 ever refused a bath. She said she was unsure if Resident #11 received a bath last week. She said according to Resident #11's bath documentation, she last received a bed bath on 01/20/2024. She said the CNA on the hall was responsible for bathing residents. She said it was the responsibility of the CNA staff to ensure Resident #11 received a bath three times a week. She confirmed no staff had reported to her Resident #11 refused any ADLs. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 12:55 p.m. with S8CNA. She said she provided care to Resident #11. She said Resident #11 required maximum assistance with bed baths. She said Resident #11 should receive a bed bath on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. She said Resident #11 had never refused a bed bath. She said she was unsure if Resident #11 received a bath last week. She said prior to today, she provided care to Resident #11 on 01/26/2024. She confirmed 01/26/2024 was her scheduled bath day, but she did not give her a bath. She said there was no process in place to ensure a resident was provided a bath. She said Resident #11's assigned CNA was responsible for her baths. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 1:10 p.m. with S2CN. She reviewed Resident #11's ADL log and said the last documented bath for Resident #11 was on 01/20/2024. She said Resident #11 should receive a bath three days a week. She confirmed Resident #11 was not capable of providing her own bath. She said the CNA staff on the hall were responsible for bathing residents. She said the CNA staff should document when a bed bath was given or give the information to the nurse to document in the resident's Clinical Record. An interview was conducted on 01/30/2024 at 1:30 p.m. S1ADM. He said he became aware today Resident #11 had not received a bed bath since 01/20/2024. He said Resident #11 should receive a bath three days a week. After reviewing Resident #11's bath log, he confirmed the last documented bed bath was on 01/20/2024. He said the CNA staff should document when a bed bath was given or give the information to the nurse to document in the resident record.
Nov 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by S11C...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by S11CNA for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance Citation. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect Prevention Program revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: This facility will not condone any form of resident abuse. Each resident residing in this facility has the right to be free from verbal abuse. Abuse/neglect reporting definitions: Abuse - the willful infliction of injury .intimidation .with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Verbal abuse - the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed, in part, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Major Depressive Disorder and Other Specified Anxiety Disorders. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/11/2023 revealed, in part, a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of S11CNA's Employee Timecard revealed she clocked in for work at 7:54 a.m. and clocked out at 7:02 p.m. on 10/28/2023. Review of the facility's Staffing and Assignment Log dated 10/28/2023 revealed S11CNA was assigned to Resident #1 from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Review of the facility's Incident Report for Resident #1 revealed the following, in part: Discovered: 10/30/2023 at 1:30 p.m. Resident Victim: Resident #1 Accused: S11CNA Accused Allegation: Verbal Abuse Allegation Finding: Substantiated Review of the facility's video footage of Resident #1's hallway was conducted on 11/21/2023 at 9:23 a.m. with S1ADM who confirmed the following: Video footage dated 10/28/2023 at 11:35 a.m.: Resident #1 was ambulating using her rollator and passed S11CNA in the hallway. S11CNA then followed Resident #1 up the hallway, and S12CNA was observed to be positioned behind S11CNA and Resident #1. Review of S12CNA's statement of the incident revealed the following: On Saturday, 10/28/2023, I, S12CNA, saw S11CNA and Resident #1 have words. I heard Resident #1 get mad and come out of church and walk to her room telling S11CNA, bite me then B****. I don't know what S11CNA said to her in church, but I do know while walking behind her, she did tell Resident #1 she was a B****, and it takes a B**** to know a B**** and told her she would push her down. Signed: S12CNA An interview was conducted with Resident #1 on 11/20/2023 at 10:44 a.m. She stated she was unable to recall the date, but a few weeks ago, S11CNA began cursing at her. She stated S11CNA called her a B***. Resident #1 stated there was another CNA who witnessed S11CNA curse at her. She stated when S11CNA cursed at her, it made her feel angry. An interview was conducted with S12CNA on 11/20/2023 at 1:58 p.m. She stated, on 10/28/2023, between the time of breakfast and lunch, she heard Resident #1 and S11CNA having a verbal altercation on the hallway. She stated Resident #1 said to S11CNA, bite me B****. She stated S11CNA then said to Resident #1, you are a B****, keep talking and I will push you down. She confirmed S11CNA verbally abused Resident #1. An interview was conducted with S11CNA on 11/20/2023 at 1:06 p.m. She confirmed cursing at a resident was verbal abuse. An interview was conducted with S2DON on 11/21/2023 at 8:45 a.m. She stated on the morning of 10/30/2023, she was made aware of a situation involving Resident #1 and S11CNA. She stated she talked with Resident #1. She stated Resident #1 reported S11CNA cursed at her by calling her a B****. She stated she and S1ADM reviewed video footage and began an investigation. She stated upon watching video footage, she could see Resident #1 going through the hallway and S11CNA was standing against the wall. She stated she could visibly see Resident #1 and S11CNA exchanging words. She confirmed a staff member cursing at a resident was verbal abuse. An interview was conducted with S1ADM on 11/21/2023 at 9:11 a.m. He stated he was made aware of the situation involving Resident #1 and S11CNA on 10/30/2023. He stated Resident #1 reported she was leaving church, and S11CNA called her a B****. He stated he reviewed the facility's video footage of the incident. He stated Resident #1 passed by S11CNA in the hallway. He stated S11CNA then followed Resident #1 down the hall and S12CNA was present. He stated S12CNA heard the exchange and reported Resident #1 and S11CNA were cursing back and forth at each other, which he determined was verbal abuse. He confirmed a CNA cursing at a resident was verbal abuse. The facility had implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: Beginning on 10/30/2023 an in-service was conducted by the DON with all staff regarding abuse. The following areas were discussed: 1. The facility does not condone any form of resident abuse. 2. Each resident has the right to be free from verbal abuse. 3. Residents may not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, other residents. 4. Definitions and examples of abuse with focused on verbal abuse. 5. Reporting was also discussed with immediate notification of any potential abuse be reported to the Administrator/DON/ADON. On 10/30/2023, a baseline assessment was conducted by administrative staff with all residents in the affected section to ensure that no residents were affected by any verbal abuse from employee. The accused employee was put on administrative leave on 10/30/2023. They did not work after 10/28/2023. On 10/30/2023, a body audit was done on the affected resident. No redness, marking, or bruising was identified. The resident was monitored by administrative nursing staff for any potential side effects of alleged abuse-no change in demeanor or habit noted. A QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure that residents remained free from verbal abuse and reporting timely. Staff were in-serviced and residents were questioned to ensure compliance. On 11/08/2023, the Administrator spoke with the resident council in regards to the definition of abuse, and their reporting immediately to the Administrator/DON/ADON. It was also discussed that residents should not abuse staff in any of the aforementioned ways. Ongoing monitoring, random rounds are made by the Administrator each day he is here to assess for continued compliance of abuse reporting. These rounds are made at various times throughout the day in resident rooms and common areas. No further issues have been noted since this allegation. All residents have the potential to be affected by this alleged deficient practice. Effectiveness of the corrective actions will be discussed weekly for 6 weeks at the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting with findings added to the QAPI minutes. Additional in-service and/or corrective actions will be implemented as needed. Completion date: 11/08/2023. Throughout the survey from 11/20/2023 to 11/21/2023, random staff interviews revealed staff received training on the facility's abuse and abuse reporting policy and procedure, including reporting of suspected or suspicious abuse to the ADON, DON, or Administrator immediately. Observations were made throughout the survey with no abuse identified. Observations, interviews, and record review, revealed monitoring had begun with no further iss
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure verbal abuse was reported to the facility administrator im...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure verbal abuse was reported to the facility administrator immediately, but not later than 2 hours after abuse occurred for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for abuse. This was evidenced by S12CNA failing to notify administration immediately after S11CNA was witnessed verbally abusing Resident #1. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance Citation. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect Investigation, Protection, and Reporting revealed the following, in part: In the event of any evidence involving . abuse . an occurrence will be reported immediately to the Administrator or his or her designee of the facility, who will immediately notify .appropriate state officials per state guidelines. 1. Any person who witnesses or has knowledge of any act or suspected act of abuse/neglect .will notify his/her supervisor immediately. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed, in part, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Major Depressive Disorder and Other Specified Anxiety Disorders. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/11/2023 revealed, in part, a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of S11CNA's employee timecard revealed she clocked in for work at 7:54 a.m. and clocked out at 7:02 pm on 10/28/2023. Review of the facility's Staffing and Assignment Log dated 10/28/2023 revealed S11CNA was assigned to Resident #1 from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Review of the facility's Incident Report submitted to the State Survey Agency for Resident #1 revealed the following, in part: Discovered: 10/30/2023 at 1:30 p.m. Entered: 10/30/2023 at 3:18 p.m. Resident Victim: Resident #1 Accused: S11CNA Accused Allegation: Verbal Abuse Allegation Finding: Substantiated An interview was conducted with Resident #1 on 11/20/2023 at 10:44 a.m. She stated she was unable to recall the date, but a few weeks ago, S11CNA began cursing at her. She stated S11CNA called her a B****. Resident #1 stated there was another CNA who witnessed S11CNA curse at her. She stated on Monday, 10/30/2023, she reported it to S1ADM. An interview was conducted with S5LPN on 11/20/2023 at 12:57 p.m. She stated she was assigned to Resident #1 on 10/28/2023 from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. She stated she was unaware of Resident #1 being abused during her shift. She stated if S11CNA cursed at Resident #1, she should have been made aware. An interview was conducted with S12CNA on 11/20/2023 at 1:58 p.m. She stated, on 10/28/2023, between the time of breakfast and lunch, she heard Resident #1 and S11CNA having a verbal altercation. She explained S11CNA said to Resident #1, you are a B****, keep talking and I will push you down. She confirmed S11CNA verbally abused Resident #1. She stated she did not report the situation to anyone until Monday, 10/30/2023. S12CNA confirmed she should have reported the incident to the nurse on duty and S2DON immediately. An interview was conducted with S2DON on 11/21/2023 at 8:45 a.m. She stated on the morning of 10/30/2023, S12CNA came to her office and told her she was concerned about the way S11CNA was talking to Resident #1 on the previous Saturday. She stated she went and talked with Resident #1. She stated Resident #1 reported S11CNA cursed at her by calling her a B****. She confirmed a staff member cursing at a resident was verbal abuse and should have been reported to administration immediately. An interview was conducted with S1ADM on 11/21/2023 at 9:11 a.m. He stated he was made aware of the situation involving Resident #1 and S11CNA on 10/30/2023. He stated Resident #1 reported she was leaving church and S11CNA called her a B****. He stated S12CNA heard the exchange and reported Resident #1 and S11CNA were cursing back and forth at each other, which he determined was verbal abuse. He confirmed a CNA cursing at a resident was verbal abuse. He confirmed the incident should have been reported to him immediately and it was not. The facility had implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: Beginning on 10/30/2023 an in-service was conducted by the DON with all staff regarding abuse. The following areas were discussed: 1. The facility does not condone any form of resident abuse. 2. Each resident has the right to be free from verbal abuse. 3. Residents may not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, other residents. 4. Definitions and examples of abuse with focused on verbal abuse. 5. Reporting was also discussed with immediate notification of any potential abuse be reported to the Administrator/DON/ADON. On 10/30/2023, a baseline assessment was conducted by administrative staff with all residents in the affected section to ensure that no residents were affected by any verbal abuse from employee. The accused employee was put on administrative leave on 10/30/2023. They did not work after 10/28/2023. On 10/30/2023, a body audit was done on the affected resident. No redness, marking, or bruising was identified. The resident was monitored by administrative nursing staff for any potential side effects of alleged abuse-no change in demeanor or habit noted. A QAPI monitor has been developed to ensure that residents remained free from verbal abuse and reporting timely. Staff were in-serviced and residents were questioned to ensure compliance. On 11/08/2023, the Administrator spoke with the resident council in regards to the definition of abuse, and their reporting immediately to the Administrator/DON/ADON. It was also discussed that residents should not abuse staff in any of the aforementioned ways. Ongoing monitoring, random rounds are made by the Administrator each day he is here to assess for continued compliance of abuse reporting. These rounds are made at various times throughout the day in resident rooms and common areas. No further issues have been noted since this allegation. All residents have the potential to be affected by this alleged deficient practice. Effectiveness of the corrective actions will be discussed weekly for 6 weeks at the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting with findings added to the QAPI minutes. Additional in-service and/or corrective actions will be implemented as needed. Completion date: 11/08/2023. Throughout the survey from 11/20/2023 to 11/21/2023, random staff interviews revealed staff received training on the facility's abuse and abuse reporting policy and procedure, including reporting of suspected or suspicious abuse to the ADON, DON, or Administrator immediately. Observations were made throughout the survey with no abuse identified. Observations, interviews, and record review, revealed monitoring had begun with no further issues identified.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled resident's care plan interventions by failing to perform placement of a right hand splint. Findings: Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Osteoarthritis, Muscle Wasting to Right and Left Shoulder, Right and Left Forearm, and Lack of Coordination. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/01/2023 revealed she had a BIMS of 14, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #2's current Care Plan included the following: Problem: Self Care ADL deficit Interventions: Apply splint to Right Hand 6 hours a day, and remove splint from Right hand after being worn for 6 hours a day. Review of Resident # 2's Physician Orders date 09/22/2023 revealed apply splint to right hand 6 hours a day at 6:00 a.m.; Remove splint from right hand after being worn for 6 hours a day at 12:00 p.m. On 11/20/2023 at 8:48 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #2 not wearing a splint to her right hand. On 11/20/2023 at 11:10 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #2. She was observed not wearing a splint to her right hand. She reported staff had not applied the splint to her right hand in months. She stated she was unable to apply the splint to her hand without staff assistance. She stated she was unable to straighten her 4th and 5th fingers on her right hand. She reported she asked several CNA's to apply the splint, but they could not find it. She reported her 4th and 5th fingers had worsened since admission, and it was due to staff not applying her right hand splint. She reported her goal was to continue to use her right hand without her fingers becoming contracted. On 11/20/2023 at 11:21 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6CNA who reported she had not observed Resident #2 wearing a splint to her right hand in the past month, and never applied resident's splint to right hand. On 11/20/2023 at 12:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7CNA who reported she had never applied the splint to Resident #2's right hand. She stated she did not place the splint because she did not want to apply it. She reported she did not report to the nurse that she did not place the splint. On 11/20/2023 at 1:42 p.m., an interview was conducted with S9CNA who reported she did not see the splint to Resident #2's right hand when she provided restorative care to her. She reported floor CNAs and staff Nurses were responsible to place the splint. On 11/20/2023 at 1:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S10OT. She reported Resident #2's splint was recommended for the alignment of her joints, and was ordered to prevent her from losing joint integrity to her right hand. She confirmed the joints would worsen without use of the splint. On 11/20/2023 at 2:12 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN who confirmed she did not apply Resident #2's splint the morning of 11/20/2023, and should have. She reported she was not following Resident #2's care plan when she did not apply the splint as ordered. On 11/20/2023 at 3:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON and S3LPN who confirmed Resident #2's splint should be placed to her right hand every morning per CNA or nursing staff, and removed 6 hours later per physician orders. They confirmed if nursing staff did not apply the splint, then staff did not follow the current care plan and should have. On 11/20/2023 at 4:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3LPN and S1ADM who both confirmed Resident #2 had physician orders and was care planned to place the right hand splint daily at 6 a.m., and remove at 12 p.m. They further conformed the orders should have been completed by the nurse or floor CNAs. They confirmed the staff nurse was responsible to ensure the floor CNAs applied the splint. They both confirmed staff did not follow the plan of care and should have.
Aug 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary cathet...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections. The facility failed to ensure Physician Orders for monthly catheter changes were implemented for 1 (#1) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #5) residents reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Medical Records revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Cerebral Vascular Disease, Personal History of Urinary Tract Infections, and Reflex Neuropathic Bladder. Review of Resident#1 quarterly MDS with ARD of 07/14/2023 revealed he had a BIMs of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. Further Review revealed Resident #1 was incontinent of bladder with a Suprapubic indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #1's August 2023 Physicians Orders revealed Suprapubic Catheter 20 Fr/30cc Registered Nurse to change catheter and bag every month. Suprapubic Catheter 20 Fr/30cc Registered Nurse to change catheter and GU Bag PRN dislodgement. Review of Resident #1's 07/01/2023 to 08/23/2023 MAR revealed Suprapubic Catheter was last changed on 07/22/2023. Resident #1 did not receive any PRN Suprapubic Catheter changes. Further review revealed Resident #1's Suprapubic Catheter change due on 08/19/2023 at 5:00 a.m., and was not documented it was changed. On 08/23/2023 at 9:19 a.m., an observation of Resident #1 had an indwelling Suprapubic Catheter draining yellow urine into GU Bag with moderate amount of cream colored sediment in the tubing and GU Bag. On 08/23/2023 at 2:04 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1LPN. She stated on 08/19/2023 she informed S2RN of Resident #1's catheter needing to be changed for his scheduled monthly changing. She stated she did not change the catheter because she is an LPN and the order states a Registered Nurse should change the Suprapubic Catheter. She stated on 08/19/2023 she marked 'not administered' on the MAR for Resident #1's order to change the Suprapubic Catheter. On 08/23/2023 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2RN. She confirmed on 08/19/2023, S1LPN informed her Resident #1's Suprapubic Catheter needed to be changed. She confirmed she did not change it on 08/19/2023 due to being busy with another resident that night. She further confirmed she did not put a nurse's note into the EMR, but should have indicating the catheter was not changed. On 08/23/2023 at 3:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4DON and S5ADON. They both confirmed they were unaware of Resident #1's Suprapubic Catheter not being changed on 08/19/2023 as ordered, and confirmed it been changed since 07/22/2023. They both confirmed Resident #1's indwelling Suprapubic Catheter should have been changed on 08/19/2023 per Physician Orders. On 08/24/2023 at 9:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3ADM who confirmed Resident#1's Suprapubic Catheter had not been changed from 07/22/2023-08/23/2023, and should have been changed per physician orders on 08/19/2023.He stated Resident#1 had a history of Chronic Urinary Tract Infections, and if the Suprapubic Catheter was changed per Physicians Orders it could decrease Urinary Tract Infections.
Jul 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 (#3) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) residents reviewed. Findings: A review of the facility's Call Light System policy revealed, in part: Unless indicated in the care plan, each resident, when in their room or in bed, must have the call light placed within reach at all times, regardless of staff assessment of resident ability to use it. When out of bed, call bell is to be pulled so it is accessible from wheelchair or bedside table. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis, in part of Idiopathic Progressive Neuropathy, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy Right and Left Thigh, Right Upper Arm, Left Shoulder and Left Upper Arm, and Right and Left Hand. A review of the current Care Plan for Resident #3 revealed the resident was at risk for falls. Interventions included encourage resident to call for assist, keep call light in reach, and respond in a timely manner, start date 09/08/2022. On 07/05/2023 at 10:05 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #3 sitting in her wheelchair, with her call light on her bed and outside of her reach. An interview was conducted at this time and Resident #3 confirmed she could not reach her call light. On 07/05/2022 at 11:20 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #3 sitting in her wheelchair with her call light on her bed and outside of her reach. Resident #3 was calling out for someone to help her. An interview and observation was conducted at this time with S2HKS, she verified Resident #3's call light was outside of her reach and was calling for help. On 07/07/2023 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3ADON. She confirmed when a resident is in their wheelchair, their call light should be in reach.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
Jan 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 (#65) of 5 (#7, #43, #65, #73, #92) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse/Neglect Policy Statement, revealed the following, in part: Each resident residing in this facility has the right to be free from .physical abuse, . Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, . other residents. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/12/2022 revealed Resident #7 had a BIMS of 9, which indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #7's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem onset: 07/09/2022 Problem: Behavior: Had a physical altercation with another resident. 01/13/2023 - punched another resident in the head. No injuries noted. Interventions: Immediately separated both residents, Placed on list to see psych, send to hospital for psych. Monitor and document behaviors every shift while receiving psychoactive medications. Review of the Nurses Notes dated January 2023 for Resident #7 revealed the following, in part: On 01/13/2023 Resident #7 was self propelling in the hallway when Resident #65 was passing by going in the opposite direction and Resident #7 hit Resident #65 with a closed fist on the left side of his forehead. Both residents were immediately separated and Resident #7 was brought to the dining room for closer observation. Resident #7 was sent to hospital for behaviors. Resident #65 Review of Resident #65's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/27/2022 revealed Resident #65 had a BIMS of 3, which indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. An interview was conducted on 01/25/2023 at 1:05 p.m. with S4CNA. She stated she witnessed the incident between Resident #7 and Resident #65 on 01/13/2023. S4CNA stated she was walking along side Resident #65 while he was in his wheelchair when Resident #7 was coming down the hall from the opposite direction in her wheelchair. She stated Resident #7 rolled by and punched Resident #65 with a closed fist on the side of the head. S4CNA stated there was no arguing noted or fussing, and the punch came out of nowhere. An interview was conducted on 01/25/2023 at 12:20 p.m. with S2DON. She stated she was notified Resident #7 punched Resident #65. She stated after the incident staff was not in-serviced. She stated monitoring for Resident #7 was not increased and the only change that was made was to deescalate Resident #7 by bringing her into the nurse's station during outbursts. She confirmed the incident was a resident to resident physical abuse. An interview was conducted on 01/24/2023 at 3:03 p.m. with S1ADM. He stated he was aware of the resident to resident altercation between Resident #7 and Resident #65. He confirmed the facility substantiated physical abuse towards Resident #65.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#62) of 2 (#42, #62) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings: A review of the facility's Comprehensive Resident Care Plan Policy stated, in part: Policy: A comprehensive care plan will be developed for each resident, according to the OBRA mandated dates. The comprehensive care plan will be revised as often as necessary to provide the information necessary to provide appropriate care and services for the resident. Procedure: 4. Updates: Any change that would require an alteration in the normal, daily care routine of the resident should be added or deleted from the present plan of care when indicated. A review of the Clinical Record for Resident #62 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis, which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. A review of the quarterly MDS with ARD of 12/08/2022 for Resident #62 revealed a BIMs of 0, indicating Resident #62 was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the Wound and Skin Status assessment dated [DATE] revealed a deteriorating stage II pressure ulcer status to Resident #62's right hip. A review of the Physician Orders dated January 2023 revealed the following: Pressure ulcer to right hip: clean with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply collagen with silver and cover with a silicone dressing every 3 days until resolved. A review of Resident #62's care plan revealed no goals or interventions related to pressure ulcers. On 01/26/2023 at 10:08 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #62's stage II pressure ulcer to his right hip. On 01/26/2023 at 2:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3CCC. She stated she was the MDS nurse and was responsible for updating Resident #62's care plan. She reviewed Resident #62's care plan and verified that he was not care planned for pressure ulcers and should have been. On 01/26/2023 at 3:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She reviewed Resident #62's care plan and confirmed Resident #62 was not care planned for pressure ulcers and should have been.
Nov 2022 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by another resident for 1 (R3) of 2 (#2 and R3) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: This facility will not condone any form of resident abuse. Each resident residing in this facility has the right to be free from verbal abuse. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, other residents. Reporting Definitions: 1. Abuse-the willful infliction of injury, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish . 4. Verbal abuse-the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Additionally, threats of corporal punishment to control behavior are considered verbal abuse. Resident #2 Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/17/2022 revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of the current Care Plan for Resident #2 revealed the following, in part: Problem Onset: 08/17/2022 Problem: Mood state: Mood disorder related to diagnosis of Depression. Is easily angered, belittles staff, refuses meds and care, and thinks that staff is trying to kill her. Approaches: Assess for changes in mood status. Monitor patterns of target behaviors. Review of the Nurses Notes dated March-November 2022 revealed no documentation of Resident #2 being abusive or verbally aggressive towards another resident. There was documentation of consistent refusal of care, being verbally abusive and disrespectful to staff. Resident #R3 Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Yearly MDS with an ARD of 09/15/2022 revealed Resident #R3 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of the Nurses Notes dated March-November 2022 revealed no documentation of Resident #2 being abusive or disrespectful to Resident #R3. 03/07/2022- Notification of Room change provided to Resident #R3. On 11/29/2022 at 8:05 a.m., a confidential telephone interview was conducted with a visitor of the facility. The visitor said Resident #2 was verbally abusive towards staff. The visitor witnessed Resident #2 being mean, derogatory, and making condescending remarks to Resident #R3. The visitor said in July 2022, but not sure of an exact date, Resident #2 called Resident #R3 stupid and no good. The visitor said S2DON was aware of Resident #2 verbally abusing the staff and Resident #R3 because they had a conversation about it. On 11/29/2022 at 9:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #R3. She said Resident #2 had been mean to her every day since she moved into her room. She said Resident #2 cursed at her, called her a h**, b****, and then threatened to have her family come to the facility and kick her a**. She said it made her cry when Resident #2 treated her like that. She said Resident #2 would laugh at her, call her weak and a big ole cry baby. She said she told Resident #2 she hurt my feelings and made me feel bad for the words she said to me but she didn't care. She said staff knew Resident #2 was mean to her and made her cry. She said she had not requested a room change, this was her room first, and no staff had asked her if she wanted to change rooms. When asked if she felt Resident #2 was verbally abusive to her she replied, Yes she is. She said she did not want to move rooms because staff might put Resident #2 in a room with someone that could not handle her abuse and she could handle it. On 11/29/2022 at 9:37 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She said no staff had ever reported Resident #2 being verbally abusive towards Resident #R3. She said recently Resident #R3 came to her and said Resident #2 cursed her and was mean. She said she considered what Resident #R3 reported to be verbal abuse. She said she did not report the allegation of verbal abuse to anyone because she did not witness it. She reviewed Resident #2 and Resident #R3's nurse's notes for October and November 2022 and confirmed she did not document the allegation of verbal abuse in either resident's chart. She confirmed she should have reported Resident #R3's allegation of verbal abuse from Resident #2 immediately to her supervisor. On 11/29/2022 at 10:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8CNA. She said she had witnessed Resident #2 curse Resident #R3. She could not recall specific dates but said it happened several times. She said Resident #2 said F*** you and kiss her a** to Resident #R3. She said she considered this to be verbal abuse. She said she would tell Resident #R3 to leave the room and take a walk with her until Resident #2 calmed down. She said she did not report the verbal abuse to anyone. She said Resident #2 was verbally abusive to staff and Resident #R3. She confirmed she should have reported the verbal abuse immediately to her supervisors. On 11/29/2022 at 10:19 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9CNA. She said Resident #2 was verbally abusive to the staff and to Resident #R3. She said she witnessed Resident #2 call Resident #R3 stupid, retarded, yell at her and accuse her of stealing things from her refrigerator. She said she could not recall specific dates but it happened all the time. She said she had witnessed Resident #2 make Resident #R3 cry. She said recently she witnessed Resident #2 cursing at Resident #R3 to get her F*****g a** off her side of the room after Resident #2 told Resident #R3 to bring her a wipe. She said she considered this to be verbal abuse but had not reported the witnessed incidents and should have. On 11/29/2022 at 10:43 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10CNA. She said Resident #2 was real mean and cursed at staff. She said she witnessed, but could not recall details, of Resident #2 cursing at and speaking down to Resident #R3. She said Resident #R3 would just walk out of the room and would not respond to her. She said she considered Resident #2 to be verbally abusive to staff and Resident #R3. She said she reported the verbal abuse to the nurse and her supervisor when Resident #2 was ugly to staff. She said she had mentioned the verbal abuse from Resident #2 to Resident #R3 to a nurse in the past but not sure who or when. She said Resident #R3 helped Resident #2 with whatever she asked but would talk nasty to Resident #R3 saying move, you don't know how to do anything right. She said Resident #R3 would walk off and waved her hand like she was done with it. She said Resident #R3 mostly stood in her doorway or the hallway to stay out of Resident #2's way. On 11/29/2022 at 11:40 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S11CNA. She said Resident #2 was verbally abusive to staff and to Resident #R3. She said just the other day, she witnessed Resident #2 calling Resident #R3 an alcoholic crack head and that she had slept with her own son. She said Resident #R3 got upset, left the room and would vent to staff in the hallway. She said Resident #R3 was always in tears because of the way Resident #2 treated her. She considered this to be verbal abuse. She said she reported the verbal abuse to S5LPN and a few other nurses. She said the nurses would then talk to Resident #2 about her behaviors. She said sometimes Resident #2 would stop and other times she ranted on and on and continued to be rude to the staff and Resident #R3. On 11/29/2022 at 12:03 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S12CNA. She said Resident #2 was rude and cursed at the staff. She said she witnessed Resident #2 being rude to Resident #R3 all the time. She said Resident #2 and Resident #R3 had been roommates since she started work at the facility a few months ago and the verbal abuse was already going on when she got here. She said she had talked to Resident #2 about treating Resident #R3 that way. She said she witnessed Resident #2 telling Resident #R3 I hope you have a seizure, fall out the bed and hit your head. She said Resident #R3 cried and told Resident #2 she did not need to hurt her feelings like that. She said she reported this to S6LPN who went and talked to Resident #2 who then cursed S6LPN out. She said Resident #R3 stood outside her room door and told staff when Resident #2 was being ugly to her. She said Resident #2 was verbally abusive to staff and to Resident #R3. She said Resident #R3 did not argue back with Resident #2. She said Resident #R3 stayed out of her room as much as she could to avoid Resident #2. On 11/29/2022 at 1:36 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6LPN. She said Resident #2 was mean and cursed at staff. She said staff nor did Resident #R3 ever report to her that Resident #2 was verbally abusing Resident #R3. She said she documented Resident #2's behaviors in the nursing notes but sometimes she got busy and forgot to. On 11/29/2022 at 2:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with S13SW. She said staff had reported Resident #2 cursing at them often. She reviewed Resident #R3's clinical record and confirmed Resident #2 was moved into Resident #R3's room on 03/07/2022. She said Resident #R3 nor staff had ever reported to her any issues between Resident #2 and Resident #R3. On 11/29/2022 at 2:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4CNAS. She said Resident #2 was verbally abusive to staff. She said no staff had reported to her any issues or allegations of abuse between Resident #2 and Resident #R3. She said she would have expected staff to report any alleged or witnessed abuse right away. On 11/30/2022 at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She said Resident #2 called staff names and cursed at them. She said Resident #R3 nor had staff ever reported to her that Resident #2 was being mean to Resident #R3. She said she considered Resident #2 cursing at and calling Resident #R3 names to be verbal abuse. She said she would have expected staff to report any alleged or witnessed abuse immediately. On 11/30/2022 at 12:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He said he was not aware of any allegation of verbal abuse from Resident #2 to Resident #R3. He said staff should report any type of abuse immediately.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of verbal abuse were reported immediatel...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of verbal abuse were reported immediately to the Administrator and within 2 hours after the allegations were made to the state agency for 1 (#R3) of 2 (#2, #R3) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse/Neglect Investigation, Protection, and Reporting revealed the following, in part: In the event of any evidence involving abuse, an occurrence will be reported immediately to the Administer or his or her designee of the facility. 1. Any person who witnesses or had knowledge of any act or suspected act of abuse will notify his/her supervisor immediately. Resident #2 Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/17/2022 revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Resident #R3 Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Yearly MDS with an ARD of 09/15/2022 revealed Resident #R3 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of the Nurses Notes dated March-November 2022 for Resident #R3 revealed the following: 03/07/2022- Notification of Room change provided to Resident #R3. On 11/29/2022 at 9:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #R3. She said Resident #2 had been mean to her every day since she moved into her room. She said staff knew Resident #2 was mean to her and made her cry. When asked if she felt Resident #2 was verbally abusive to her, she replied, Yes she is. On 11/29/2022 at 9:37 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She said no staff had ever reported Resident #2 being verbally abusive towards Resident #R3. She said recently, but not sure exactly when, Resident #R3 came to her and reported Resident #2 cursed at her and was mean. She said she considered what Resident #R3 reported to be verbal abuse. She said she did not report the allegation of verbal abuse to anyone because she did not witness it. She confirmed she should have reported Resident #R3's allegation of verbal abuse from Resident #2 immediately to her supervisor. On 11/29/2022 at 10:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8CNA. She said she had witnessed Resident #2 curse at Resident #R3. She could not recall specific dates but said it happened several times. She said she considered this to be verbal abuse. She said she did not report the verbal abuse to anyone. She said Resident #2 was verbally abusive to staff and Resident #R3. S8CNA further stated her supervisors knew about it but they let Resident #2 get away with it. She confirmed she should have reported the verbal abuse immediately to her supervisors. On 11/29/2022 at 10:19 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9CNA. She said she had witnessed Resident #2 being mean and curse at Resident #R3 many times. She said she could not recall specific dates but it had happened a lot. She said she had witnessed Resident #2 make Resident #R3 cry. She said she considered this to be verbal abuse. She said Resident #R3 had reported Resident #2's behavior to the nurses herself. She said she had not reported Resident #2 verbally abusing Resident #R3 and should have. On 11/30/2022 at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She said staff did not report to her that Resident #2 was being mean and cursing at Resident #R3. She said she considered Resident #2 cursing at and calling Resident #R3 names to be verbal abuse. She said she would have expected staff to report any alleged or witnessed abuse immediately. On 11/30/2022 at 12:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He confirmed he was unaware of any resident-to-resident verbal altercations between roommates Resident #2 and Resident #R3. He said he would have expected staff to report any allegation of abuse immediately.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help preve...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. The facility failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate infection control practices, hand hygiene and proper glove use for 3 (R1, R2, and R4) of 6 (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, and R7) residents observed for incontinence care. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Incontinent Care: Bladder revealed the following, in part: Procedure: 2. Perform handwashing or use alcohol gel. 8. Put on disposable gloves. 9. For female perineal care: b. Wash the mons pubis, rinse, and dry. 11. Remove and discard gloves. 12. Perform handwashing or use alcohol gel. Resident #R1 On 11/28/2022 at 9:26 a.m., an observation was made of S8CNA and S9CNA performing incontinence care for Resident #R1. Without performing hand hygiene, S8CNA and S9CNA donned clean gloves and pulled back Resident #R1's bed linens. S8CNA unfastened and lowered Resident #R1's soiled brief then cleaned Resident #R1's perineal area and turned the resident on her left side. S8CNA did not remove her soiled gloves or sanitize her hands and proceeded to place a clean brief on Resident #R1, reposition the pad underneath her, straighten her gown, touch the resident's linens to straighten her in bed, adjust the pillow behind her head, cover her with bed linens, and touch the bed remote. S8CNA and S9CNA were not observed to perform hand hygiene until after completing incontinence care on Resident #R1. On 11/28/2022 at 9:36 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8CNA. She verified the above observations for Resident #R1. She confirmed she should have performed hand hygiene prior to applying clean gloves and providing care to Resident #R1. She confirmed she should have removed her soiled gloves and performed hand hygiene after providing incontinence care and before touching Resident #R1 and her personal belongings. Resident #R2 On 11/28/2022 at 9:40 a.m., an observation was made of S9CNA performing incontinence care for Resident #R2. Without performing hand hygiene, S9CNA donned clean gloves and pulled back Resident #R2's linens. S9CNA unfastened and lowered Resident #R2's brief that contained feces, then proceeded to use perineal wipes to clean the feces off of Resident #R2 with both gloved hands. While wearing soiled gloves, she touched the residents left arm and left leg to turn him to his right side. She continued cleaning the feces from Resident #R2's buttocks and perineal area. With visibly soiled gloves, she applied a clean brief and clean pad to Resident #R2. Feces was observed to transfer from S9CNA's soiled gloved hands to the clean brief and bed linens. S9CNA then used the same soiled gloved hands to turn the resident on his back using the bed linens, fastened Resident #R2's brief, straightened his gown, repositioned his pillow, covered him with bed linens, and touched his call light, bed remote control and bedside table. While wearing soiled gloves, S9CNA tied the trash bag, removed it from the trash can and placed it on the resident's floor. S9CNA then touched the door handle, opened the door, exited the room and walked down the hall to the trash barrels. While walking down the hall, S9CNA removed her soiled gloves, placed them in her left hand, touched the clean linen cart with her right hand, touched the trash barrel and rolled it down the hall to Resident #R2's room. Without performing hand hygiene, S9CNA applied clean gloves, removed the lid, placed the trash in the barrel, and replaced the lid. S9CNA rolled the trash barrel down the hall near the shower room. On 11/28/2022 at 9:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9CNA. She verified the above observations of Resident #R2. She confirmed she should have performed hand hygiene prior to applying clean gloves and providing care to Resident #R2. She confirmed she should have removed her soiled gloves and performed hand hygiene after providing incontinence care and before touching Resident #R2 and his personal belongings. She confirmed she should have removed her soiled gloves and performed hand hygiene prior to touching the door knob when she exited Resident #R2's room. She confirmed she should not have walked down the hall wearing or holding soiled gloves and then touch the clean linen cart and the trash barrel. She said prior to performing incontinence care, she should have placed the trash barrel outside of Resident #R2's door for disposal of soiled items. She confirmed at this time she had not yet performed hand hygiene after providing incontinence care to Resident #R2 and should have. Resident #R4 On 11/28/2022 at 4:03 p.m., an observation was made of S7CNA performing incontinence care for Resident #R4. Without performing hand hygiene, S7CNA donned clean gloves, unfastened Resident #R4's soiled brief and cleaned the resident's perineal area. S7CNA removed Resident #R4's soiled brief. S7CNA did not remove her soiled gloves or sanitize her hands and proceeded to place a clean brief on Resident #R4. S7CNA removed her soiled gloves, placed them in the trash can and tied up the trash bag. S7CNA then removed the trash bag, touched the door handle, opened the door, exited the room, and proceeded into the hallway carrying the trash bag down the hallway. On 11/28/2022 at 4:07 p.m., an interview was conducted with S7CNA. She verified the above observations of Resident #R4. She confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene prior to donning clean gloves and providing incontinence care to Resident #R4. She confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene or change her soiled gloves after performing incontinence care to Resident #R4. She confirmed she should have performed hand hygiene prior to touching Resident #R4's door knob when she exited the room. She said she should have made sure the trash barrel was placed outside of Resident #R4's door for disposal of soiled items as to not carry the trash bag down the hall. On 11/29/2022 at 2:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4CNAS. She was notified of the above observations during incontinence care. She stated she would have expected the CNA staff to perform hand hygiene before incontinence care, remove the soiled gloves after cleaning a bowel movement or urine, perform hand hygiene and then apply clean gloves. She stated she would expect the CNA staff to change their gloves and sanitize their hands after performing perineal care, prior to applying a clean brief, and prior to touching the resident or their personal items. She stated the CNA staff should not leave a resident's room with soiled gloves, touch the clean linen cart or the trash barrels. She said the CNA staff should move the trash barrel outside the resident's room prior to incontinence care as to not carry trash bags down the hall. On 11/30/2022 at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She was notified of the above observations during incontinence care. She stated she would expect staff to perform hand hygiene prior to and after completing incontinence care. She stated she would expect staff to change their gloves and sanitize their hands after performing perineal care, prior to applying a clean brief, and prior to touching the resident or their personal items. She stated the CNA staff should not exit a resident's room while wearing soiled gloves and without performing hand hygiene. She said the CNA should move the trash barrel outside the resident's room prior to incontinence care as to not carry trash bags down the hall.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 44% turnover. Below Louisiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 4 life-threatening violation(s), $164,576 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 38 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $164,576 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc Staffed?

CMS rates JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 44%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc?

State health inspectors documented 38 deficiencies at JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 33 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc?

JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 122 certified beds and approximately 94 residents (about 77% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in BATON ROUGE, Louisiana.

How Does Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (44%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.

Is Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc Stick Around?

JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC has a staff turnover rate of 44%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc Ever Fined?

JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC has been fined $164,576 across 3 penalty actions. This is 4.7x the Louisiana average of $34,725. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Jefferson Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?

JEFFERSON MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.