CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Chateau Terrebonne Health Care Center has a Trust Grade of D, which indicates below-average care and raises some concerns for potential residents and their families. It ranks #67 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing it in the top half of the state, and #2 out of 4 in Terrebonne County, meaning only one local facility has a better ranking. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with reported issues increasing from 2 in 2024 to 5 in 2025. Staffing is a weakness here, rated at 2 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 33%, which is better than the state average but still below average overall. There were serious concerns noted in inspections, including a critical incident where a resident with severe cognitive impairment was able to elope from the facility, which could have led to dangerous situations. Additionally, the facility failed to hold a necessary care planning conference for another resident, indicating lapses in care coordination. While the health inspection score is relatively good at 4 out of 5 stars, the overall quality measures are poor, highlighting both strengths and significant weaknesses in care.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Louisiana
- #67/264
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 33% turnover. Near Louisiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $28,805 in fines. Higher than 88% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 15 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (33%)
15 points below Louisiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Above Louisiana average (2.4)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
13pts below Louisiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
May 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the resident or responsible party (RP) with written notic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to complete quarterly safe smoking assessments for 1 (Resident #11) of 1 (Resident #11) sampled residents investigated for smoking.
Finding...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to complete a care plan conference for 1 (Resident #119) of 1 (Resident #119) sampled residents investigated for care planning.
Findings:
R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's tracheostomy care was completed in a sanitary manner for 1 (Resident #90) of 1 (Resident #90) sampled r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to assess residents for self-administration of drugs ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the menu prescribed by the registered dietician was followed for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
4 deficiencies
2 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to keep a resident free from e...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
The facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently by failing to provide supervision to keep a resident free from elopement for 1 (Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an incident of neglect, which resulted in elopement, to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #96) of 1 (Resident #96) sampled re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to:
1.) maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis center, and
2.) to act upon the Registered Dietician's recommendations for 1 (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 33% turnover. Below Louisiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $28,805 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 12 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $28,805 in fines. Higher than 94% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade D (41/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Chateau Terrebonne Health's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Chateau Terrebonne Health Staffed?
CMS rates CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 33%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Chateau Terrebonne Health?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Chateau Terrebonne Health?
CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRIORITY MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 197 certified beds and approximately 149 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HOUMA, Louisiana.
How Does Chateau Terrebonne Health Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (33%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Chateau Terrebonne Health?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Chateau Terrebonne Health Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Chateau Terrebonne Health Stick Around?
CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 33%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Chateau Terrebonne Health Ever Fined?
CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER has been fined $28,805 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,367. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Chateau Terrebonne Health on Any Federal Watch List?
CHATEAU TERREBONNE HEALTH CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.