VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE

5002 HIGHWAY 10, JACKSON, LA 70748 (225) 634-4000
Government - State 299 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
0/100
#261 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease in Jackson, Louisiana has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. Ranking #261 out of 264 in the state places it in the bottom tier of Louisiana facilities, and #3 out of 3 in East Feliciana County means there are no better local options available. Although the facility's trend is improving, with a decrease in issues from 16 to 8, the overall situation remains troubling, particularly with $313,544 in fines, which is higher than 84% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. Staff turnover is a positive aspect, reported at 0%, which is well below the state average, indicating that staff are likely to stay long-term and know the residents well. However, serious incidents have been documented, including cases of mental and physical abuse among residents, highlighting significant safety concerns that families should consider before choosing this facility.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Louisiana
#261/264
Bottom 2%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
16 → 8 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
✓ Good
$313,544 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
Violations
⚠ Watch
40 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 16 issues
2025: 8 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Louisiana average (2.4)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Federal Fines: $313,544

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

The Ugly 40 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a functioning assistance device for supervisi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a functioning assistance device for supervision to prevent an accident from occurring for 1 (RR1) of 2 (#3 and RR1) residents who required assistant devices. Findings: Review of Resident R1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included, Unspecified Psychosis, Unspecified Dementia, and Schizophrenia. Review of Resident R1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/04/2025 revealed Resident R1 was assessed by the facility to have a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) of 3, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed he used a wander/elopement alarm daily. A review of Resident R1's active Physician Orders, dated 05/28/2025, revealed the following, in part: 03/17/2025 - Wanderguard; check bracelet every shift to ensure functioning and in place every day and night shift. A review of Resident R1's elopement risk assessment revealed no elopement assessment was completed. On 05/28/2025 on 8:35 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident R1 exiting door A with staff and the alarm did not sound. On 05/28/2025 at 11:37 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. S4LPN stated Resident R1 frequently wandered and required a Wanderguard bracelet for safety. She stated on the weekend of 05/17/2025, Resident R1 exited door A with staff and the alarm did not sound. She stated she reported the Wanderguard system not working to S3RNS. She stated if the Wanderguard system did not work it was possible for a resident to exit the building onto the facility's grounds without staffs' knowledge and allowing an increase chance for accidents to occur. On 05/28/2025 at 12:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3RNS. She stated residents with a Wanderguard bracelet were not safe unsupervised outside. She stated if the alarm did not sound, staff would not be aware a resident exited the building and could result in an accident. She stated she did not recall being informed the Wanderguard system was not working on the weekend of 05/17/2025. On 05/28/2025 at 1:20 p.m., an observation was conducted with S2MAN. S2MAN exited door A with a Wanderguard bracelet and the alarm did not sound. S2MAN stated he tested the Wanderguard system weekly but the last test was completed on 05/13/2025 because he had been on leave. On 05/28/2025 at 1:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. She stated they did not complete elopement risk assessments at the facility. She further stated based on quarterly documentation and behaviors, the IDT identified residents at risk for accidents due to wandering unsupervised. She stated a resident identified with a higher risk for accidents would receive an order for a Wanderguard bracelet for the resident's safety. She stated if a resident with a Wanderguard bracelet exited the building it would notify staff and they would redirect them back to the unit. She confirmed she was not aware the Wanderguard system was not working properly and the Wanderguard system should be working.
Apr 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment for 1 (#2) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) sampled resident's rooms observ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment for 1 (#2) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) sampled resident's rooms observed. Findings: On 04/28/2025 at 9:33 a.m., an observation of Resident #2's room revealed a urine soiled brief on the floor between his bed and his roommate's bed. On 04/28/2025 at 9:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S7LPN. She confirmed through observation Resident #2 had a brief soiled with urine on the floor. She confirmed the soiled brief should not be on Resident #2's floor. On 04/28/2025 at 2:38 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident#2's room and revealed the urine soiled brief remained on the floor. On 04/29/2025 at 10:20 a.m. an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated it was not acceptable to have a soiled brief on the floor in a resident's room. On 04/29/2025 at 1:49 p.m., an interview was conducted with S9PD. He confirmed he was director of housekeeping. He further confirmed having a urine soiled brief remain on the floor in Resident #2's room for 5 hours was not acceptable.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosoci...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident based on the Facility Assessment. The deficiency had the potential to affect the facility's total census of 153 residents. Findings: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 04/16/2025 revealed the following, in part: Staffing Plan . Based on your resident population and their needs for care and support, describe your general approach to staffing to ensure that you have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents at any given time. Position: Licensed nurses providing direct care- 6 total number needed per shift Nurse Aides- 14 total number needed per shift Other Nursing Personnel (those with administrative duties) - 5 total number needed per shift Review of the facility staff assignment sheets revealed the following: 04/24/2025 night shift (6 p.m. - 6 a.m.)- 8 CNA, 6LPN, 3RN which included RN supervisor providing direct care on the unit 04/25/2025 night shift (6 p.m. - 6a.m.)- 7 CNA, 8LPN, 1RN 04/26/2025 day shift (6 a.m. - 6 p.m.)- 12 CNA, 6 LPN, 3 RN which included 2 RN supervisors providing direct care on the unit. 04/26/2025 night shift (6 p.m. - 6 a.m.)- 6 CNA, 5 LPN, 4 RN which included 2 RN supervisors providing direct care on the unit. 04/27/2025 day shift (6 a.m. - 6 p.m.)- 13 CNA, 4 LPN, 4 RN which included 2 RN supervisors providing direct care on the unit 04/27/2025 night shift (6 p.m. - 6 a.m.)- 6CNA, 8LPN, 2RN 04/28/2025 day shift (6 a.m. - 6 p.m.)- 8CNA, 6 LPN, 3 RN which included RN supervisor providing direct care on the unit 04/28/2025 night shift (6 p.m.-6a.m.) - 8CNA, 8 LPN, 2 RN which included RN supervisor providing direct care on the unit On 04/28/2025 at 10:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8CNA. S8CNA confirmed she worked the day shift and when she had multiple hall assignments she could not complete 30 minute rounds on all residents and residents had to wait greater than 30 minutes for assistance. S8CNA stated she could not meet the needs of all of her residents due to staff shortages. On 04/28/2025 at 1:48 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She reported she worked day shift and her resident load was unmanageable due to staff shortages. She confirmed there was not enough staff to meet the residents' needs. On 04/28/2025 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6CNA. She reported she was responsible for 23 residents on day shift. She stated when she was assigned 23 residents she could not complete 30 minute rounds on all residents and residents had to wait greater than 30 minutes for assistance. S6CNA confirmed she could not meet the needs of all of her assigned residents due to staff shortages. On 04/28/2025 at 2:12 p.m., an interview was conducted with S11LPN. She confirmed staff shortages including working a unit without a CNA was unmanageable to meet all resident's and pass medications timely. On 04/29/2025 at 9:22a.m., an interview was conducted with S3CR. S3CR confirmed the facility did not have enough staff to meet the needs of the residents. On 04/29/2025 at 10:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON reviewed the Facility Assessment and confirmed the staffing requirements for the facility included 14 CNA's, 6 licensed nurses, and 5 other nursing personnel with administrative duties per shift. On 04/29/2025 at 3:57 p.m., an interview was conducted with S10RN. She confirmed she was responsible for completing nursing assignments for the facility. She confirmed she did not complete assignments according to the Facility Assessment because she was unaware of the Facility Assessment or the staff required each shift. She reviewed the Facility Assessment and confirmed the staffing requirements were not met during the aforementioned timeframe. On 04/29/2025 at 2:35p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He confirmed the Facility Assessment listed the accurate staffing needs for the facility. He confirmed the facility was not staffed per the Facility Assessment.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were capable of using the call system had call bells accessible for 5 (#2, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) of 7...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were capable of using the call system had call bells accessible for 5 (#2, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) of 7 ((#1, #2, #3, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy titled Resident Call System dated effective 11/1999 revealed the following, in part: Purpose: to respond to resident's needs and requests Procedure: I. Keep all lights within reach of residents, either clipped to sheets on bed, tied to the side rail or clipped to beside chair. On 04/28/2025 at 9:33 a.m., observations revealed the following: Resident #2 lying in bed. No call bell available in the wall system. Resident #R4 lying in bed call bell behind bed on the floor out of reach. Resident #R5 lying in bed. No call bell available in the wall system. Resident #R6 in bed with feet on the floor out the left side of the bed and upper body in the bed with head of bed elevated. Call bell behind the bed on the floor out of reach. Resident #R7 lying in bed. No call bell available in the wall system. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/25/2025 revealed Resident #2 had no impairment of upper extremities. Review of Resident#R4's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/06/2025 revealed Resident #R4 had no impairment of upper extremities. Review of Resident #R5's admission MDS with an ARD of 02/20/2025 revealed Resident #R5 had no impairment of upper extremities. Review of Resident #R6's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of02/26/2025 revealed Resident #R6 had no impairment of upper extremities. Review of Resident #R7's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/27/2025 revealed Resident #R7 had no impairment of upper extremities. On 04/28/2025 at 9:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S7LPN after she made call bell observations for Residents #2, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7. She confirmed the aforementioned observations. She confirmed all of the above residents were physically able to use the call bell system. She confirmed each resident should have a call bell accessible and within reach to call for assistance, but did not. On 04/29/2025 at 1:49 p.m., an interview was conducted with S9PD. He confirmed Residents #2, #R4, #R5, #R6, and #R7 could physically use a call bell system. He confirmed each room should have a call bell available in the room, which should be in reach of the resident. On 04/29/2025 at 2:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He confirmed all residents should have a call bell accessible in their room for use and it should be within reach of the resident.
Mar 2025 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident property by S4...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident property by S4RN for 2 (#1 and #2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. The facility implemented corrective actions, which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 02/01/2025 when S4RN withheld Resident #1 and Resident #2's 7:00 p.m. 01/31/2025 medications. Two staff members observed both Resident #1 and Resident #2's 7:00 p.m. 01/31/2025 dose of medications inside of S4RN's personal bag after S4RN verbalized the resident's refused the medications. These medications included cardiac, hypertension, seizure, diabetic, and psychiatric medications. Residents are likely to suffer serious harm, impairment, or death as a result of staff misappropriating of residents' property. S1DON was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 03/10/2025 at 4:50 p.m. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy revised on 03/2023, revealed in part, the following: A. Purpose-It is the policy to prohibit neglect, exploitation of residents. Ciii. Examples: 5. Exploitation: Some examples include taking money or other personal property from a resident for one's own use, taking residents medication for own personal use. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder, Dementia, Epilepsy, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2, Chronic Embolism and Thrombosis, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #1's MDS with an ARD of 12/18/2024 revealed a BIMS of 00, which indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #1's Nursing Progress Note dated 02/01/2025 at 6:30 a.m. revealed S5LPN wrote: on 02/01/2025 at approx. 6:30 a.m., I observed S4RN placing Resident #1's medication packets into her personal bag. Review of Resident #1's January 2025 Physician Orders revealed in part, the following: Coreg Oral Tablet 6.25 mg, give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day. Depakote Oral Tablet Delayed Release 125mg, give one tablet by mouth two times a day. Docusate Sodium Oral Capsule 100mg, give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day. Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Keppra Oral Tablet 500mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Metformin Oral Tablet 1,000mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Risperdal Oral Tablet 2mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Seroquel Oral Tablet 50mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Unable to interview Resident #1 due to Resident #1's cognitive impairment. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2, Unspecified Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Epilepsy, Essential Hypertension, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Unspecified Side. Review of Resident #2's MDS with an ARD of 01/07/2025 revealed a BIMS of 99, which indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #2's Nursing Progress Note dated 02/11/2025 at 2:29 p.m. revealed S5LPN wrote: Late entry: On 02/01/2025 at approx. 6:30 a.m., I observed S4RN placing Resident #2's medication packets into her personal bag. Review of Resident #2's January 2025 Physician Orders revealed in part, the following: Docusate Sodium Oral Capsule 250mg, give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day. Fibercon Oral Tablet 625mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Keppra Oral Tablet 500mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Crestor Oral Tablet 10mg, give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime. Zoloft Oral Tablet 100mg, give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime. Review of facility's Incident Investigation Report dated 02/01/2025, revealed in part, the following: Name of Resident: Resident #1 Date Incident Occurred: 02/01/2025 Time Incident Occurred: 6:30 a.m. Where Incident Occurred: Nurses' Station Description of Incident: I observed S4RN placing this resident's medication packet into her personal bag. Witness: S13CGT Other Resident Involved: Resident #2 Signature Person Completing This Form: S5LPN An observation was made on 03/03/2025 at 9:18 a.m. with S5LPN of photography provided by the facility dated 02/01/2025 revealed in part, the following: 1. Medication packets which included resident names: Resident #1 2. 01/31/2025, 7:00 p.m. doses, and medication listed present: Coreg Oral Tablet 6.25 mg Depakote Oral Tablet Delayed Release 125mg Docusate Sodium Oral Capsule 100mg Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5 mg Keppra Oral Tablet 500mg Metformin Oral Tablet 1,000mg Risperdal Oral Tablet 2mg Seroquel Oral Tablet 50mg 3. Medication packets which included resident names: Resident #2 4. 01/31/2025, 7:00 p.m. doses, and medication listed present: Docusate Sodium Oral Capsule 250mg Fibercon Oral Tablet 625mg Keppra Oral Tablet 500mg Crestor Oral Tablet 10mg Zoloft Oral Tablet 100mg 5. Multiple opened medication packets. 6. 1 clear medication crush bag with white residue inside. Unable to interview Resident #2 due to Resident #2's cognitive impairment. An interview was conducted on 03/03/2025 at 9:18 a.m. with S5LPN. She stated on 02/01/2025 around 6:00 a.m. shift change, she and S4RN conducted a medication cart count. She stated S4RN had her left hand closed during the count and was acting erratically with incoherent speech. She stated S4RN reported Resident #1 and Resident #2 refused their 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. medications. She stated S4RN went into the nurses' station after the count was completed. S5LPN stated she and S13CGT witnessed S4RN open her left hand and remove pills, which she then placed into a medication crush bag. S4RN then rolled the bag up, and placed it in her pocket. She stated she observed S4RN place resident medication packets into her personal bag and then enter the restroom. She stated while S4RN was in the restroom, she and S12RN looked into S4RN's personal bag and observed unopened medication packets with Resident #1 and Resident #2's names, dated 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. doses. She stated they also observed multiple empty medication packets and a medication pill crush bag with white residue inside S4RN's personal bag. She stated pictures were taken of the contents of S4RN's personal bag. She stated she notified S11RNS around 6:30 a.m. of S4RN's impairment, unopened medication packets inside S4RN's personal bag, and documented the incident. She stated she immediately assessed Resident #1 and Resident #2, obtained vital signs, notified the nurse practitioner, and RP. She stated Resident #1 and Resident #2 had no negative outcomes, however both were likely to have a seizure or serious injury due to staff misappropriating their property and not continually receiving their prescribed medications. She stated S4RN documented Resident #1 and #2's 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. medications were administered on the MARs. She stated S4RN remained in the restroom for hours before security escorted her to the local hospital for a drug screen. She stated S4RN did not return for any further shifts. She stated she received in-services related to medication administration, documentation of administration, neglect, exploitation, and reporting in February 2025. She stated S2DON and a pharmacy consultant conducted audits and monitored all medication carts since this incident. S5LPN reviewed the pictures with surveyor and stated you could see Resident #1 and Resident #2's name, the medications listed in the packets, and the medications were due to be administered on 01/31/2025 at 7:00 p.m. An interview was conducted on 03/05/2025 at 8:50 a.m. with S13CGT. She stated on 02/01/2025 around 6:00 a.m., S5LPN and S4RN conducted a medication cart count. She stated S4RN spoke to her and was acting erratically and her words were incoherent. She stated S4RN went into the nurses' station. She stated she and S5LPN witnessed S4RN place medications from her left hand into a medication crush bag, roll the bag up, and place the bag in her pocket. She stated she observed S4RN place medication packets into her personal bag and then enter the restroom. She stated while S4RN was in the restroom, she and S5LPN looked into S4RN's personal bag and observed unopened medication packets with Resident #1 and Resident #2's names, dated 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. doses. She stated they also observed multiple empty medication packets and a medication pill crush bag with white residue inside of it in S4RN's personal bag. She stated pictures were taken of the contents of S4RN's personal bag. She stated Resident #1 and Resident #2 did had no negative outcomes. She stated S4RN remained in the restroom for hours before security escorted her to the local hospital for a drug screen. She stated S4RN did not return for any further shifts. She stated she received in-services related to neglect, exploitation, and reporting in February 2025. She stated S2DON and a pharmacy consultant conducted audits and monitored all medication carts since this incident. Multiple attempts to interview S4RN during survey dates 03/03/2025-03/10/2025 were made. All attempts were unsuccessful. An interview was conducted on 03/05/2025 at 9:10 a.m. with S3ADON. She stated S5LPN notified her on 02/01/2025 of residents' medication packets in S4RN's personal bag and possible impairment. She stated it was S11RNS's responsibility to report this incident to S1ADM. She stated S5LPN immediately assessed Resident #1 and Resident #2, obtained vital signs, notified the nurse practitioner, and RP. She stated Resident #1 and Resident #2 had no negative outcomes, however both were likely to have a seizure or serious injury due to staff misappropriating their property and not receiving their prescribed medications. She stated S4RN documented 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. medications as administered for both Resident #1 and Resident #2 MARs. She stated in the photography of the unopened medication packets, you could see the resident's name, dosage, date, and time to be administered which was 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. She stated you could see empty medication packets and a clear pill crush bag. She stated S4RN remained in the restroom for hours before security escorted her to the local hospital for a drug screen. She stated S4RN did not return for any further shifts. S3ADON stated she received in-services related to medication administration, documentation of administration, neglect, exploitation, and reporting in February 2025. She stated S2DON and a pharmacy consultant conducted audits and monitored all medication carts since this incident. An interview was conducted on 03/05/2025 at 11:21 a.m. with S21NP. He stated Resident #1 and Resident #2 both had the likelihood of suffering from potential serious harm by not receiving their prescribed medications. An interview was conducted on 03/10/2025 at 3:57 p.m. with S11RNS. He stated on 02/01/2025 around 6:30 a.m. he was notified of possible impairment of S4RN. He stated a drug screen was ordered for S4RN and S1ADM was notified of possible impairment of S4RN. He stated later around 3:00 p.m., he was notified of residents' medication packets in S4RN's personal bag. He stated Resident #1 and Resident #2 had no negative outcomes, however both were likely to have a seizure or serious injury due to staff misappropriating their property and not receiving their prescribed medications. He stated S4RN did not return for any further shifts. He stated he received in-services related to medication administration, documentation of administration, neglect, exploitation, and reporting in February 2025. He stated S2DON and a pharmacy consultant conducted audits and monitored all medication carts since this incident. An interview was conducted on 03/10/2025 at 2:00 p.m. with S2DON. She stated S3ADON notified her on 02/01/2025 of residents' medication packets in S4RN's personal bag and possible impairment. She stated S5LPN immediately assessed Resident #1 and Resident #2, obtained vital signs, notified the nurse practitioner, and RP. She stated Resident #1 and Resident #2 had no negative outcomes, however both were likely to have a seizure or serious injury due to staff misappropriating their property and not receiving their prescribed medications. She stated S4RN documented 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. medications as administered for both Resident #1 and Resident #2 MARs. She stated S4RN remained in the restroom for hours before security escorted her to the local hospital for a drug screen. She stated S4RN did not return for any further shifts. She reviewed the photography with surveyor which was taken on 02/01/2025 and confirmed Resident #1 and Resident #2's name could be seen as well as the medications and date of 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. She stated she received in-services related to medication administration, documentation of administration, neglect, exploitation, and reporting in February 2025. She stated she and a pharmacy consultant conducted audits and monitored all medication carts since this incident. An interview was conducted on 03/10/2025 at 12:57 p.m. with S1ADM. He stated on 02/01/2025, S11RNS notified him of possible impairment of S4RN. He stated he was not made aware of residents' medication packets in S4RN's personal bag until 02/04/2025. He stated Resident #1 and Resident #2 had no negative outcomes. He stated S4RN remained in the restroom for hours before security escorted her to the local hospital for a drug screen. He stated S4RN did not return for any further shifts. He stated all staff received in-services related to medication administration, documentation of administration, neglect, exploitation, and reporting in February 2025. He stated S2DON and a pharmacy consultant conducted audits and monitored all medication carts since this incident. Throughout the survey from 03/03/2025 to 03/10/2025, observations, record review, and staff interviews revealed staff received training on the facility's medication administration, documentation of administration, neglect, exploitation, and reporting policies and procedures. Interviews revealed staff were knowledgeable of the types of neglect and exploitation, and were aware to report these incidents to administration immediately. The facility had implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: 1. Corrective actions were accomplished on 02/27/2025 for residents found to be affected by the alleged to include: a. S4RN was ordered to undertake a drug screen. b. S4RN placed on investigatory leave. c. Case reported to Adult Protective Services, Registered Nursing Board, Pharmacy Consultant, and law enforcement. Responsible parties of all potential victims were notified. 2. All staff in-serviced on abuse, neglect, medication administration, and controlled drug policy. 3. Medication carts were randomly audited by administrative staff and pharmacy consultant. 4. Medication carts remain audited on monthly basis or as needed. 5. Corrective action will be completed by 02/27/2025 with 100% staff trained.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of neglect/misappropriation of property were re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of neglect/misappropriation of property were reported in the required timeframe for 2 (#1 and #2) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, R1, and R2) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy revised on 03/2023, revealed in part, the following: 5. Exploitation: Some examples include taking money or other personal property from a resident for one's own use, taking residents medication for own personal use. 7. Neglect: Acts of omissions by a person responsible for providing care of treatment which placed the resident at risk for harm, or which deprived a resident of sufficient or appropriate services, treatment or basic care. Civ. Procedure to Report Neglect-Any Employee: 1. To the Immediate Supervisor: Immediately, but in no case later than one hour after knowledge or suspicion. 5. If unable to report face to face or by phone to supervisor or any supervisor, report immediately by phone or face to face to Client Rights Officer. Cv. Responsibility of RN Supervisor: 2. Immediately, but in no case later than one hour, after knowledge or suspicion, make a verbal report to the Administrator. 11. Notify local law enforcement for any allegations of any allegation of exploitation. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder, Dementia, Epilepsy, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2, Chronic Embolism and Thrombosis, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #1's Nursing Progress Note dated 02/01/2025 at 6:30 a.m. S5LPN wrote: on 02/01/2025 at approx. 6:30 a.m., I observed nursing supervisor placing this resident's medication packets into her personal bag. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2, Unspecified Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Epilepsy, Essential Hypertension, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Unspecified Side. Review of Resident #2's Nursing Progress Note dated 02/11/2025 at 2:29 p.m. S5LPN wrote: Late entry: On 02/01/2025 at approx. 6:30 a.m., I observed nursing supervisor placing this resident's medication packets into her personal bag. Review of facility's Incident Investigation Report dated 02/01/2025, revealed in part, the following: Name of Resident: Resident #1 Date Incident Occurred: 02/01/2025 Time Incident Occurred: 6:30 a.m. Date Incident Discovered: 02/01/2025 Time Incident Discovered: 6:30 a.m. Where Incident Occurred: Nurses' Station Type of Incident: Alleged Neglect Description of Incident: I observed nursing supervisor placing this resident's medication packet into her personal bag. Witness: S13CGT Other Resident Involved: Resident #2 Signature Person Completing This Form: S5LPN Review of facility's email to Adult Protective Services revealed in part, the following: Date: 02/04/2025 Time: 1:57 p.m. Notification of allegation of possible exploitation against a resident(s) by a staff member. An interview was conducted on 03/03/2025 at 9:18 a.m. with S5LPN. She stated on 02/01/2025 around 6:00 a.m. during shift change, she and S4RN conducted a medication cart count. She stated S4RN had her left hand closed the entire time she was speaking to her and was acting erratically and speaking incoherently. She stated S4RN reported to her that Resident #1 and Resident #2 refused their 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. medications. She stated S4RN then went into the nurses' station. S5LPN stated she and S13CGT witnessed S4RN place medications from her left hand into a medication crush bag, roll the bag up, and place the bag in her pocket. She stated she was unsure what medications S4RN placed into the medication crush bag. She stated she observed S4RN place medication packets into her personal bag and then enter the restroom. She stated while S4RN was in the restroom, she and S12RN looked into S4RN's personal bag and observed unopened medication packets labeled with Resident #1 and Resident #2's names and dated 01/31/2025 7:00 p.m. doses. She stated they also observed multiple empty medication packets and a medication pill crush bag with white residue inside S4RN's personal bag. S5LPN stated pictures were taken at this time of the contents of S4RN's personal bag. She stated she notified S11RNS around 6:30 a.m. of S4RN's impairment, medication packets located inside S4RN's personal bag, and documented the incident. An interview was conducted on 03/05/2025 at 9:10 a.m. with S3ADON. She stated S5LPN notified her on 02/01/2025 of residents' medication packets observed in S4RN's personal belonging bag and possible impairment. She stated she notified S2DON of residents' medication packets observed in S4RN's personal belonging bag and possible impairment on 02/01/2025. She stated it was S11RNS's responsibility to report this incident to S1ADM. An interview was conducted on 03/10/2025 at 3:57 p.m. with S11RNS. He stated on 02/01/2025 around 6:30 a.m. he was notified of possible impairment of S4RN. He stated a drug screen was ordered at the local hospital for S4RN and S1ADM was notified of possible impairment of S4RN. He stated later around 3:00 p.m., he was notified of residents' medication packets observed in S4RN's personal bag. He confirmed he did not notify S1ADM of this and should have. He stated S1ADM was not made aware of the residents' medication packets observed in S4RN's personal bag until 02/04/2025. An interview was conducted on 03/10/2025 at 2:00 p.m. with S2DON. She stated S3ADON notified her on 02/01/2025 of residents' medication packets observed in S4RN's personal bag and possible impairment. She stated it was S11RNS's responsibility to report this incident to S1ADM. An interview was conducted on 03/10/2025 at 12:57 p.m. with S1ADM. He stated on 02/01/2025, S11RNS notified him of possible impairment of S4RN. He stated he was not made aware of residents' medication packets observed in S4RN's personal bag until 02/04/2025 and should have been notified by S11RNS on 02/01/2025. He stated this incident was not reported to the state survey agency until 02/04/2025.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to have sufficient certified nursing assistant staff to provide direct care and related services to maintain the highest pract...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to have sufficient certified nursing assistant staff to provide direct care and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 (Unit 2B) of 2 (Unit 1A and Unit 2B) resident units reviewed for staffing. This had the potential to affect the 20 residents residing on Unit 2B. Findings: Review of the facility's Nursing Staffing Pattern revealed the facility required 2 CNA's assigned per shift for Unit 2B. Review of the facility's census dated 03/03/2025 revealed there were 20 residents residing on Unit 2B. Review of the facility's Daily Assignment Sheet dated 03/03/2025 revealed the following, in part: 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.: S9CNA - Unit 2B Further review revealed no other CNA assigned to Unit 2B. Review of the facility's Daily Assignment Sheet dated 03/05/2025 revealed the following, in part: 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.: S10CNA - Unit 2B Further review revealed no other CNA assigned to Unit 2B. An observation was made on 03/03/2025 at 9:00 a.m. of Unit 2B. Observed 5 residents tapping their hands against the nurses' station glass windows. Observed 2 staff nurses, preparing medications inside the nurses' station and ask the residents if there was anything they required help with. Observed 1 CNA, S9CNA, on Unit 2B. Observed S9CNA attempt to redirect a resident into his room for a brief change. Observed this resident refusing to go into his room while 2 other residents ask for S9CNA to change them. Observed the 5 residents continue to tap the glass windows on the nurses' station for 15 minutes. An interview was conducted with S9CNA on 03/03/2025 at 9:36 a.m. She stated she was a full time CNA on Unit 2B from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. She confirmed she was often the only CNA assigned to Unit 2B on her shift. She explained the acuity and behaviors on Unit 2B were too much for one CNA to complete all care timely. She stated multiple residents required two staff members for ADL assistance due to behaviors. She stated residents initiated their call lights and she had to explain she would return after she completed another residents' task. She stated it often took a while to find someone to assist. She stated residents would have to wait 20 to 30 minutes before they received assistance. She stated twenty to thirty minutes was too long for any resident to have to wait, especially residents on Unit 2B with behaviors. She stated one CNA was not sufficient staff for this unit. An interview was conducted with S5LPN on 03/03/2025 at 9:45 a.m. She confirmed there was often only one CNA assigned to Unit 2B during her shifts. She explained the acuity and behaviors on Unit 2B were too much for one CNA to complete all care timely. She stated multiple residents required two staff members for ADL assistance due to behaviors. She stated residents initiated their call lights and she had to explain she would return after she completed another residents' task. She stated S9CNA had to wait for the nurse to complete their task before they were available to assist. She stated residents would have to wait 20 to 30 minutes before they received assistance. She stated twenty to thirty minutes was too long for any resident to have to wait, especially residents on Unit 2B with behaviors. She stated one CNA was not sufficient staff for this unit. An interview was conducted with S8LPN on 03/03/2025 at 9:55 a.m. She confirmed there was often only one CNA assigned to Unit 2B during her shift. She explained the acuity and behaviors on Unit 2 were too much for one CNA to complete all care timely. She stated multiple residents required two staff members for ADL assistance due to behaviors. She stated residents initiated their call lights and she had to explain she would return after she completed another residents' task. She stated S9CNA had to wait for the nurse to complete their task before they were available to assist. She stated residents would have to wait 20 to 30 minutes before they received assistance. She stated twenty to thirty minutes was too long for any resident to have to wait, especially residents on Unit 2B with behaviors. She stated one CNA was not sufficient staff for this unit. An interview was conducted with S10CNA on 03/05/2025 at 9:18 a.m. She confirmed she was often the only CNA assigned to Unit 2B on her shift. She explained the acuity and behaviors on Unit 2B were too much for one CNA to complete all care timely. She stated multiple residents required two staff members for ADL assistance due to behaviors. She stated residents initiated their call lights and she had to explain she would return after she completed another residents' task. She stated sometimes it took a while to find someone to assist. She stated residents would have to wait 20 to 30 minutes before they received assistance. She stated twenty to thirty minutes was too long for any resident to have to wait, especially residents on Unit 2B with behaviors. She stated one CNA was not sufficient staff for this unit. An observation was made on 03/05/2025 at 4:10 p.m. of Unit 2B. Observed 4 residents tapping their hands against the nurses' station glass windows. Observed 2 staff nurses, preparing medications inside nurses' station and ask the residents if there was anything they required help with. Observed 1 CNA, S10CNA, on Unit 2B. Observed S10CNA attempt to redirect a resident to the day room. Observed this resident refuse to go to the day room while 3 other residents asked for S10CNA to change them. Observed the 4 residents continue to tap the glass windows on the nurses' station for 20 minutes. An interview was conducted with S6LPN on 03/05/2025 at 4:12 p.m. She confirmed there was often only one CNA assigned to Unit 2B during her shift. She explained the acuity and behaviors on Unit 2 were too much for one CNA to complete all care timely. She stated multiple residents required two staff members for ADL assistance due to behaviors. She stated residents initiated their call lights and she had to explain she would return after she completed another residents' task. She stated S10CNA had to wait for the nurse to complete their task before they were available to assist. She stated residents would have to wait 20 to 30 minutes before they received assistance. She stated twenty to thirty minutes was too long for any resident to have to wait, especially residents on Unit 2B with behaviors. She stated one CNA was not sufficient staff for this unit. An interview was conducted with S7LPN on 03/05/2025 at 4:15 p.m. She confirmed there was often only one CNA assigned to Unit 2B during her shift. She explained the acuity and behaviors on Unit 2 were too much for one CNA to complete all care timely. She stated multiple residents required two staff members for ADL assistance due to behaviors. She stated residents initiated their call lights and she had to explain she would return after she completed another residents' task. She stated S10CNA had to wait for the nurse to complete their task before they were available to assist. She stated residents would have to wait 20 to 30 minutes before they received assistance. She stated twenty to thirty minutes was too long for any resident to have to wait, especially residents on Unit 2B with behaviors. She stated one CNA was not sufficient staff for this unit. An interview was conducted with S16RNS on 03/05/2025 at 10:26 a.m. She stated she was responsible for staffing Unit 2B. She stated she based staffing on her knowledge of the facility's residents and their acuity. She stated there was no specific method the supervisors used to determine staffing. She stated Unit 2B did have residents with behaviors, and should be staffed with 2 CNAs. She was informed of surveyors' observation on 03/03/2025 of Unit 2B having only one CNA. She stated she did not think one CNA on Unit 2B was sufficient staffing. An interview was conducted with S15RNS on 03/10/2025 at 11:56 a.m. She stated Unit 2B contained residents that were at risk for elopement, escaping, and had schizophrenia. She stated Unit 2B should be staffed with two CNAs at all times.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' Medication Administration Record (MAR) were acc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' Medication Administration Record (MAR) were accurately documented for 2 (#1 and #2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. This deficient practice had to the potential to affect any of the 153 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration with revision date of August 2018 revealed the following, in part: Procedure: M. The nurse must document medication administration on the resident's MAR/electronic MAR immediately after administering the medications. N. If a resident refuses a medication, indicate on MAR/electronic MAR noting the specific date/time, document in resident's clinical record on the nurses' notes, and notify physician. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 03/04/2021, with diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder, Dementia, Epilepsy, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2, Chronic Embolism and Thrombosis, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #1's February 2025 Physician Orders revealed in part, the following: Amlodipine Oral Tablet 10 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. Cymbalta Oral Capsule 30mg, give 1 capsule by mouth in the morning. Flomax Oral Capsule 0.4 mg, give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day. Neurontin Oral Capsule 300 mg, give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day. Coreg Oral Tablet 6.25 mg, give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day. Depakote Oral Tablet Delayed Release 125mg, give one tablet by mouth two times a day. Docusate Sodium Oral Capsule 100mg, give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day. Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Keppra Oral Tablet 500mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Metformin Oral Tablet 1,000mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Risperdal Oral Tablet 2mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Seroquel Oral Tablet 50mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Insulin Regular Solution inject as per sliding scale: if 151 -200 = 2 units, sliding scale less than 60 =8 ounces of juice and call MD; 201 -250 = 4 units; 251 - 300 = 6 units; 301 - 350 = 8 units; 351 - 400 = 10 units; 401 - 450 = 12 units recheck in 2 hours, if not less by 50mg/dL call MD, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime. Review of Resident #1's February 2025 MAR revealed in part, the following: -No documented evidence Resident #1 received or refused the above-mentioned medications on 02/08/2025 through 02/10/2025 at 7:00 a.m. -No documentation of insulin administration or blood glucose check being completed or refused on 02/08/2025 through 02/10/2025 at 7:00 a.m. -No documentation of insulin administration or blood glucose check being completed or refused on 02/08/2025 and 02/09/2025 at 11:00 a.m. -No documentation of insulin administration or blood glucose check being completed or refused on 02/08/2025 through 02/10/2025 at 4:00 p.m. Review of Resident #1's physical Clinical Record revealed no paper MARs. On 03/05/2025 at 1:33 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S14RN. She stated she provided care for Resident #1 on 02/08/2025 and 02/09/2025 from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. She stated she was responsible for the administration of Resident #1's 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. medications on her shifts. S14RN stated she did not have access to the facility's electronic software for those shifts. She stated she documented the medication administration for Resident #1 in his physical Clinical Record on a paper MAR. S14RN was informed of Resident #1's February 2025 MAR findings, and she confirmed the appropriate way to document medication administration or refusal should be done on MAR. On 03/10/2025 at 12:02 p.m., an interview was conducted with S17LPN. She stated she provided care for Resident #1 on 02/10/2025 from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. She stated she was responsible for the administration of Resident #1's 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. medications on her shift. S17LPN confirmed she did not document Resident #1's administration or refusal of medications and blood glucose checks on the MAR and should have. On 03/10/2025 at 11:56 a.m., an interview was conducted with S15RNS. She stated staff should accurately document medication administration during medication pass. She stated the process if nurses could not access the facility's electronic software was to notify S2DON and use the paper MARs in the binder at the nurse's station. She stated when paper MARs are used nurses should document medication administration or refusals on the paper forms. S15RNS stated she was made aware of S14RN not having access to facility's electronic software on 02/05/2025 and S2DON reset her password immediately. S15RNS stated she did not recall S14RN informing her of not having access on 02/08/2025 or 02/09/2025, she further stated if she did not S14RN should have documented medication administration on paper MARs. S15RNS reviewed Resident #1's February 2025 MAR, and she confirmed aforementioned findings were blank and administrations or refusals were not documented. On 03/10/2025 at 12:16 p.m., an observation interview was conducted with S15RNS. S15RNS reviewed the binder in which she stated should contain the units paper MARs for all residents, and it failed to contain any current paper MARs for any residents. Further review revealed paper MARs were dated December 2024. She stated the process was for the night shift nurses to remove all old MARs from the binder and place them on the resident's physical Clinical Record on the last day of the month. S15RNS reviewed Resident #1's physical Clinical Record, and confirmed it failed to reveal any paper MARs. S15RN further confirmed she could not provide documentation of medications being administered or refused for Resident #1 for 02/08/2025 through 02/10/2025 and she should have. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2, Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Epilepsy, Hypertension, Aphasia, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, and Constipation. Review of Resident #2's February 2025 Physician Orders revealed in part, the following: Hydrochlorothiazide Oral Capsule 12.5mg, give 1 capsule by mouth in the morning. Norvasc Oral Tablet 10mg, give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning. Plavix Oral Tablet 75mg, give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning. Docusate Sodium Oral Capsule 250mg, give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day. Fibercon Oral Tablet 625mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Keppra Oral Tablet 500mg, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of Resident #2's February 2025 MAR revealed in part, the following: - No documented evidence Resident #2 received or refused the above-mentioned medications on 02/13/2025 at 7:00 a.m. Review of Resident #2's physical Clinical Record revealed no paper MARs. On 03/05/2025 at 4:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6LPN. She stated she provided care for Resident #2 on 02/13/2025 from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. S6LPN stated she was responsible for administering Resident #2's 7:00 a.m. medications on her shift. S6LPN reviewed Resident #2's February 2025 MAR, and confirmed she did not document these medications as administered and should have. On 03/10/2025 at 1:53 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated she expected all staff to accurately document medication administration on the MAR at the time of administration. S2DON stated there was no current process for staff to use in the event in which they could not access facility's electronic software. She stated S14RN should have had access to facility's electronic software on 02/08/2025 and 02/09/2025 and there was no excuse for her to not properly document her medication administration on the MAR. She further stated she reset S14RN's password and educated her on how to gain access if she were to get locked out again. S2DON was informed of all the aforementioned findings for Resident #1 and #2, and she confirmed all medication administrated and glucose checks completed or refused should have been documented on the resident's MARs, and they were not.
Nov 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment which promotes quality of l...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment which promotes quality of life through dignity and respect for 1 (#94) of 5 (#10, #16, #94,#107, and #150) residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with meals in a dignified manner as evidenced by staff standing over Residents #94 while assisting him to eat. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Feeding a Resident with an effective date of November 1999 revealed the following, in part: Procedure: R. If possible, sit facing the resident while feeding is taking place A review of Resident #94's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction and Acquired Absence of Right Fingers. A review of Resident #94's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/22/2024 revealed functional limitation in range of motion to bilateral upper extremities and dependent on staff for eating. On 11/06/2024 at 12:48 p.m., an observation was conducted of S5CNA and Resident #94. S5CNA stood over Resident #94 feeding him. A chair was noted behind S5CNA. S5CNA continued to feed Resident #94 standing next to his bed until his meal was completed. S5CNA stated she does not sit when feeding Resident #94. S5CNA confirmed Resident #94 was dependent on staff for feeding assistance and she should have been sitting on his level when assisting him with his meal. On 11/07/2024 at 1:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON confirmed S5CNA should sit when assisting Resident #94 with meals.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective system was in place to incorporate Level II PA...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective system was in place to incorporate Level II PASARR determination recommendations in the resident's care planning for 1 (#106) of 3 (#33, #106, and #145) residents reviewed for PASARR. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 58 residents residing in the facility with a PASARR Level II as determined by the facility. Findings: Review of Resident #106's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Schizoaffective Disorder - Bipolar Type. Review of Resident #106's Level II PASARR Determination dated 08/08/2024 revealed the following, in part: Specialized Services Recommendations: Individual outpatient therapy - checked Other - checked Other specialized services: schedule a psychiatric evaluation - include treatment recommendations Review of Resident #106's current Care Plan revealed no documented evidence of a Level II PASARR or any recommended interventions. Review of Resident #106's electronic and paper Clinical Record revealed no evidence a psychiatric evaluation was conducted. Further review revealed no documented evidence outpatient individual therapy services were implemented or offered. An interview was conducted with S9SSC on 11/06/2024 at 10:59 a.m. She stated S10MRA tracked PASARR Level IIs and reviewed recommendations. She stated she did not review any resident Level II PASARRs and/or implement any recommendations. She confirmed she did not notify the Psychologist of the need for a psychiatric evaluation for Resident #106. She confirmed she did not offer and Resident #106 had not received individual outpatient therapy services. An interview was conducted with S10MRA on 11/07/2024 at 9:35 a.m. She stated all resident Level II PASARR determinations were sent to the resident's social service counselor. She stated the social service counselor was responsible for ensuring the Level II determination recommendations were implemented. She reviewed Resident #106's PASARR Level II determination dated 08/08/2024 and confirmed individual outpatient therapy services and a psychiatric evaluation were recommended. She stated S9SSC was Resident #106's social services counselor and was responsible to implement Resident #106's Level II PASARR recommendations. She reviewed Resident #106's Clinical Record and confirmed there was no documented psychiatric evaluation after the Level II PASARR was issued on 08/08/2024. She stated S9SSC should have notified the psychologist of the need for a psychiatric evaluation. An interview was conducted with S2DON on 11/07/2024 at 9:15 a.m. She stated S10MRA was aware of the process for implementing Level II PASARR recommendations. She reviewed Resident #106's Clinical Record and confirmed a psychiatric evaluation had not been completed in the past year. She stated S9SSC would have been aware if Resident #106 had been offered and/or received outpatient therapy services. An interview was conducted with S11SSD on 11/07/2024 at 9:52 a.m. She stated there was not a specific process in place to ensure Level II PASARR recommendations were implemented. She reviewed Resident #106's Level II PASARR dated 08/08/2024 and confirmed individual outpatient therapy services and a psychiatric evaluation should have been implemented.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure nursing staff accurately documented Pressure Ulcer treatment as performed for 1 (#52) of 4 (#45, #52, #65, and #139) residents reviewed with Pressure Ulcers. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 13 residents residing at the facility with Pressure Ulcers. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Wound Care Policy and Procedures revealed the following, in part: Documentation: A. Treatment Documentation: Treatments will be initiated per physician orders. Treatments will be documented .as ordered. Review of Resident #52's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Pressure Ulcers and Paraplegia. Review of Resident #52's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/22/2024 revealed a BIMS summary score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #52's current Physician Orders dated November 2024 revealed the following, in part: Start date: 10/03/2024 - Left Proximal/Distal Lateral Lower Leg Pressure Injury: apply non-adhering dressing to exposed tendon then apply wound vacuum at 125 mm/Hg continuous pressure. Apply twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays and as needed. Review of Resident #52's electronic Wound Documentation dated 11/04/2024 revealed a checkmark with S6LPN's initials, which indicated Resident #52's left leg wound treatment was completed per the physician orders. An interview was conducted with Resident #52 on 11/04/2024 at 10:32 a.m. An interview was conducted with Resident #52 on 11/04/2024 at 10:32 a.m. He stated his left leg treatment was completed this morning by S6LPN and S7LPN. He stated S6LPN and S7LPN did not place the wound vacuum and put a dry dressing on his left leg. An observation of Resident #52's left leg was conducted at that time. There was no wound vacuum in place to the resident's left leg. An interview was conducted with S6LPN on 11/04/2024 at 11:19 a.m. She stated she performed wound care for Resident #52 this morning with S7LPN's assistance. She stated Resident #52's wound vacuum was removed this morning and not replaced. She stated she and S7LPN placed a dry dressing to Resident #52's left leg wound. An interview was conducted with S7LPN on 11/07/2024 at 1:02 p.m. She confirmed she and S6LPN performed Resident #52's wound treatment on 11/04/2024. She stated Resident #52's wound vacuum was removed this morning, not replaced and a dry dressing was placed on Resident #52's left leg wound. She confirmed Resident #52 had a left leg wound vacuum ordered at all times with changes to be completed on Mondays, Thursdays and as needed. She further confirmed S6LPN documented Resident #52's wound care was completed as ordered and it was not. An interview was conducted with S2DON on 11/07/2024 at 2:24 p.m. She stated Resident #52 had a left leg wound vacuum ordered at all times with changes to be completed on Mondays, Thursdays and as needed. She confirmed Resident #52's treatment was not completed as ordered, it was documented completed as ordered, and should not have been.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Pressure Ulcers received tre...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Pressure Ulcers received treatment and services consistent with professional standards by failing to implement the physician ordered treatment for 1 (#52) of 2 (#52 and #62) residents reviewed with wound vacuums. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 13 residents with Pressure Ulcers as listed on the facility's CMS-802. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Wound Care Policy and Procedures revealed the following, in part: Documentation: A. Treatment Documentation: Treatments will be initiated per physician orders. Treatments will be documented .as ordered. Review of Resident #52's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Pressure Ulcers and Paraplegia. Review of Resident #52's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/22/2024 revealed a BIMS summary score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #52's current Physician Orders dated November 2024 revealed the following, in part: Start date: 10/03/2024 - Left Proximal/Distal Lateral Lower Leg Pressure Injury: apply non-adhering dressing to exposed tendon then apply wound vacuum at 125 mm/hg continuous pressure. Apply twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays and as needed. An interview was conducted with Resident #52 on 11/04/2024 at 10:32 a.m. He stated his left leg treatment was completed this morning by S6LPN and S7LPN. He stated S6LPN and S7LPN did not place the wound vacuum and put a dry dressing on his left leg. An observation was made of Resident #52's left leg at that time. There was no wound vacuum noted in place to the resident's left leg. An interview was conducted with S6LPN on 11/04/2024 at 11:19 a.m. She stated she performed wound care for Resident #52 this morning with S7LPN's assistance. She stated Resident #52's wound vacuum was removed this morning and not replaced. She stated she and S7LPN placed a dry dressing to Resident #52's left leg wound. An interview was conducted with S7LPN on 11/07/2024 at 1:02 p.m. She confirmed she and S6LPN performed Resident #52's wound treatment on 11/04/2024. She reviewed Resident #52's current physician ordered wound care treatment. She confirmed Resident #52's wound vacuum dressing should have been removed and a new wound vacuum dressing applied on 11/04/2024 and was not. An observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident #52 on 11/06/2024 at 7:00 a.m. Resident #52 was lying in bed with no wound vacuum in place to his left leg. Resident #52 stated the wound vacuum was removed on 11/04/2024 and had not been replaced. An interview was conducted with S8WCN on 11/06/2024 at 11:33 a.m. She confirmed Resident #52 had a left leg wound vacuum ordered at all times with changes to be completed on Mondays, Thursdays and as needed. S8WCN confirmed she performed Resident #52's wound treatment on 11/05/2024. She confirmed Resident #52's wound vacuum was not in place on the resident's left leg on 11/05/2024 and she did not replace Resident #52's wound vacuum. She further confirmed Resident #52's left leg wound vacuum dressing should have been placed as ordered on 11/04/2024 and 11/05/2024. An interview was conducted with S2DON on 11/06/2024 at 2:34 p.m. She confirmed Resident #52 had a left leg wound vacuum ordered at all times with changes to be completed on Mondays, Thursdays and as needed. She stated Resident #52's left leg wound vacuum dressing should have been placed as ordered on 11/04/2024 and 11/05/2024.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized appropriate PPE during care w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized appropriate PPE during care with residents who required EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) for 3 (#35, #52, and #54) of 3 (#35, #52, and #54) of 3 (#35, #52, and #54) residents observed during chronic wound care and use of indwelling medical devices. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 20 residents residing in the facility on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Implementation of PPE use in LTC (Long Term Care) setting to prevent the spread of MDROs (Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms) Dated 10/24/2022, revealed the following, in part: Residents for whom EBP applies to include any resident with an indwelling medical device or wound. Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use for Enhanced Barrier Precautions include: Dressing, Bathing, Providing Hygiene, Device care or use: feeding tube, and tracheostomy, and wound care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. Resident #35 Review of Resident #35's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Encounter for Attention to Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy. On 11/04/2024 at 4:00 p.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #35's door and room. There was no signage indicating Resident #35 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and there was no PPE present. On 11/06/2024 at 9:36 a.m., an observation was conducted of S4RN administering medications via Resident #35's gastrostomy tube. S4RN did not have on a gown. On 11/06/2024 at 9:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4RN. S4RN stated she was not aware Resident #35 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to no signage on Resident #35's door. S4RN confirmed she did not wear a gown when she administered medications via Resident #35's gastrostomy tube. Resident #52 Review of Resident #52's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Pressure Ulcers. On 11/04/2024 at 10:32 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #52's door and room. There was no PPE present. On 11/06/2024 at 9:25 a.m., an observation was conducted of S8WCN performing wound care on Resident #52. S8WCN did not have on a gown. On 11/06/2024 at 11:33 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8WCN. She confirmed she did not wear a gown when she performed Resident #52's wound care. She confirmed Resident #52 had chronic Pressure Ulcers. Resident #54 Review of Resident #54's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Encounter for Attention to Tracheostomy, Colostomy, and Gastrostomy. On 11/04/2024 at 4:00 p.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #54's door and room. There was no signage indicating Resident #54 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and there was no PPE present. On 11/06/2024 at 9:30 a.m., an observation was conducted of S5CNA entering Resident #54's room without a gown. S5CNA changed Resident#54's colostomy bag, provided personal hygiene, and changed his clothing. On 11/06/2024 at 9:56 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5CNA. S5CNA reported she changed Resident #54's colostomy bag, provided personal hygiene, and changed his clothing. She confirmed she did not wear a gown when she performed the above aforementioned resident care. On 11/06/2024 at 1:14 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3RN. S3RN confirmed Resident #35, #52, and #54 had Enhanced Barrier Precautions initiated. He confirmed Resident #35, #52, and #54 should have had signage on their door indicating the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions and did not. He stated staff should have worn gowns when performing care on residents with Enhanced Barrier Precautions in place. On 11/07/2024 at 1:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She confirmed Resident #35, #52, and #54 had Enhanced Barrier Precautions initiated. She confirmed Resident #35, #52, and #54 should have had signage on their door indicating the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions and did not. She stated staff should have worn gowns when performing care on residents with Enhanced Barrier Precautions in place.
Sept 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the provider failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for 1 (#1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the provider failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for 1 (#13) of 13 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, and #13) residents sampled. Findings: Review of Resident #13's clinical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Epilepsy, Bipolar Disorder, and Alcohol Abuse. Review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/28/2024, revealed Resident #13 had a BIMS of 13, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #13's physician's orders dated 04/09/2015, revealed the following, in part: Phenobarbital 64.8 mg, 1 tablet by mouth twice daily. Review of Resident #13's Medical Administration Record (MAR) dated 08/01/2024 to 09/25/2024 revealed no documentation Phenobarbital 64.8 mg was administered on 09/04/2024 at 7:00 p.m. Review of Resident #13's Individual Patient Controlled Drug Record revealed no documentation Phenobarbital was administered on 09/04/2024 at 7:00 p.m. On 09/26/2024 at 9:27 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. S4LPN confirmed she was responsible for administering Resident #13's medications on 09/04/2025 at 7:00 p.m. S4LPN confirmed she did not administer Resident #13's ordered Phenobarbital 64.8 mg on 09/04/2024 at 7:00 p.m. and should have. On 09/26/2024 at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6NPT. S6NPT stated he expected the nurses would follow all physicians' orders when administering medication, and document the medications administered on the MAR On 09/26/2024 at 2:11 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. S1DON confirmed nurses should administer medications in compliance with physician's orders and document medication administration accurately on the MAR and Patient Controlled Drug Record.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure a resident did not receive a medication he was allergic to for 1 (#10) of 13 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, and #13) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Allergy Alert with a revision date of 10/2019 revealed the following, in part: I. Purpose: a. To prevent anaphylaxis b. To prevent allergic reactions II. Scope : Allergy alerts should be checked by all direct care staff who provide care to a resident. It is the responsibility of nurses, therapist and physicians to check resident's charts for allergies before giving a medication. III. Policy: Allergy alerts are to be placed on charts and all direct care staff who provide care to residents are to be advised of their allergies and check them prior to administering care, administering meds or feeding. Review of Resident #10's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type and Neuroleptic Induced Parkinsonism. Further review revealed Resident #10 had an allergy to Depakote. Review of Resident #10's Incident Report revealed the following, in part: Date Incident Occurred: 09/11/2024 at 8:24 p.m. Date Incident Discovered: 09/12/2024 at 12:20 a.m. Description of Incident: S10PSY ordered Depakote DR 250 mg 1 tab by mouth three times a day. Medication administered this p.m. at 8:24 x 1 by mouth. Medical records indicates that patient is allergic to Depakote. S10PSY notified. Signed by S8RN Review of Resident #10's Doctor's Orders revealed the following, in part: 09/11/2024 at 12:50 p.m. Start Depakote DR 250 mg: Take 1 tablet three times a day. Read back verbal order S10PSY and S7LPN. Review of Resident #10's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 09/01/2024 to 09/31/2024 revealed documentation Resident #10 was allergic to Depakote. Further review revealed on 09/11/2024 at 7:00 p.m., S8RN administered Depakote DR 250 mg to Resident #10. On 09/25/2024 at 10:44 a.m., an interview was conducted with S7LPN. S7LPN stated residents' allergies are listed on the cover of the hard chart, the face sheet, and on the MAR. S7LPN stated if the doctor gives a verbal order, the nurse will notify the doctor if the resident is allergic to an ingredient or medication. S7LPN reviewed Resident #10's chart and confirmed the resident chart did not have an allergy sticker on the cover. S7LPN reviewed Resident #10's Doctor's Order Sheet and confirmed she received the verbal order for Depakote 250 mg on 09/11/2024 and entered it into the computer. S7LPN confirmed she did not see an allergy sticker on the chart and did not further verify if Resident #10 had a Depakote allergy when the order was taken. On 09/26/2024 at 12:07 p.m., an interview was conducted with S8RN. S8RN confirmed Resident #10 was allergic to Depakote and had an order for Depakote 250 mg. S8RN confirmed she administered a dose of Depakote 250 mg to Resident #10 on the evening of 09/11/2024. S8RN confirmed she did not check Resident #10's allergies before administering the Depakote. On 09/26/2024 at 8:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10PSY. S10PSY confirmed he ordered Depakote for Resident #10. S10PSY stated he was not aware of Resident #10's Depakote allergy when the medication was ordered and the nurse who took the order did not notify him of the allergy. On 09/26/2024 at 11:53 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADN. S2ADN stated when verbal orders are received, the nurse should always review the resident allergies with the doctor. S2ADN stated resident allergies are on the MAR and nurses should review them before they administer medications. S2ADN reviewed Client#10's MAR and confirmed Resident #10 had an allergy to Depakote. S2ADN stated S8RN administered Depakote 250 mg on 09/11/2024, and confirmed this was a medication error. S2ADN stated S7LPN received the order for the Depakote 250 mg on 09/11/2024, she failed to communicate Resident #10's Depakote allergy with the doctor. On 09/26/2024 at 2:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. S1DON confirmed when the doctor gives a verbal medication order for a resident, the nurse should compare the order to the resident's allergies and notify the doctor if the resident is allergic to the medication. S1DON confirmed Resident #10 received Depakote, a documented medication on his allergy list, and should not have. She confirmed the nurse should check resident allergies before medications are administered.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days and indicated the duration for 1 (#8) of 13 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12 and #13) residents reviewed for medications. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic/Psychotropic Medication Policy with no revision date revealed the following, in part: 1. The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. Review of Resident #8's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Psychosis, and Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #8's September 2024 Physician's Orders revealed an order written on 12/11/2023 for Ativan 1mg tablet by mouth every six hours as needed (PRN) for agitation. Further review revealed the PRN medications had no stop date or duration. Review of Resident #8's September 2024 MAR revealed Ativan 1mg tablet by mouth was given for agitation on 09/16/2024 at 7:35 p.m., 09/18/2024 at 8:30 p.m. and on 09/23/2024 at 7:47 p.m. An interview was conducted on 09/26/2024 at 9:10 a.m. with S2DON. She reviewed Resident #8's Physician Orders and MAR dated September 2024. She confirmed Ativan 1mg was ordered PRN for longer than 14 days with no end date or duration documented.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from physical ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 3 (#3, #7, and #9) of 12(#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, 9, 10, 12, and 13) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #3 was free from physical abuse by Resident #4; 2. Resident #7 was free from physical abuse by Resident #8; and 3. Resident #9 was free from physical abuse by Resident #10. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy, with a revision date of March 2023, revealed the following, in part: Purpose: It is the policy of this facility and the state agency, to prohibit the abuse of patients/residents (henceforth referred to as resident). This facility is committed to preserving the right of each person receiving services to be free from abuse. All forms of abuse of residents by other residents of this facility are prohibited. Definitions: Physical abuse - physical contact such as hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, choking, and scratching. Review of facility's policy titled, Resident to Resident Abuse Policy, with a revision date of 06/04/2024, revealed the following, in part: Purpose: The Provider is committed to preserving the right of each person receiving services to be free from abuse. Definitions: a. Willful - .means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. b. Abuse - . the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment, with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. 1. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/01/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/04/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 6, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the facility's state agency reportable incidents for Resident #3 revealed the following: Accused Allegations: Physical Abuse Date: 08/27/2024 Incident Description: Resident #4 pushed Resident #3 out of his wheelchair. Allegation Findings: Substantiated Review of Resident #4's Nurse's Note, entered by S7LPN and dated 08/27/2024 at 8:04 a.m. revealed the following, in part: S7LPN was notified at approximately 7:10 a.m. by nurse that Resident #4 dumped Resident #3 out of his wheelchair on the smoking patio. On 09/25/2024 at 10:53 a.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #3. He stated he recalled the incident between himself and Resident #4. He stated he left his drink outside, went back outside to get it and Resident #4 had it. He stated he told Resident #4 to give it back to him and Resident #4 got mad and turned his wheelchair over. On 09/25/2024 at 2:37 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #4. He stated he had no issues with other residents and had never had an altercation with another resident. He stated he had not had any incidents or altercations with any of the residents in the facility. On 9/25/2024 at 1:49 p.m. an interview was conducted with S3CRO. S3CRO stated he was informed of the incident between Resident #3 and Resident #4. S3CRO stated he reviewed the video surveillance and observed Resident #4 push Resident #3 out of his wheelchair. S3CRO confirmed the facility substantiated the allegation of resident to resident abuse. On 09/25/2024 at 3:56 p.m. a review of the facility's video footage of the smoking patio was conducted with S11APD. Video footage dated 08/27/2024 at 7:06 a.m. revealed Residents #3 and #4 were on the smoking patio when Resident #4 pushed Resident #3 out of his wheelchair onto the ground. On 09/26/2024 at 2:09 p.m. an interview was conducted with S2ADN. She stated if a resident pushed another resident out of their wheelchair it would be considered resident to resident abuse. 2. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/29/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 01, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the facility's state agency reportable incidents for Resident #7 revealed the following: Accused Allegations: Physical Abuse Date: 08/18/2024 Incident Description: Resident #8 hit Resident #7 in the top of his head. Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/07/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On 09/24/2024 at 2:08 p.m., an interview was conducted with S13LPN. S13LPN stated she witnessed the incident between Resident #7 and Resident #8. S13LPN stated Resident #7 was sitting on the sofa in the day room when Resident #8 approached Resident #7 from behind and pushed his head with an open hand. On 09/26/2024 at 9:21 a.m., an interview was conducted with S14SO. S14SO stated on 09/18/2024 at 12:00 p.m. she witnessed Resident #8 walk up behind Resident #7, who was sitting on the couch watching television, and slap him on his head. On 09/26/2024 at 12:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3CRO. S3CRO confirmed the facility substantiated the allegation of resident to resident abuse when Resident #8 hit Resident #7. 3. Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #9's MDS with an ARD of 07/19/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 99, which indicated Resident #9 was unable to complete the assessment. Review of Resident #9's Incident Reports dated 09/10/2024 revealed the following, in part: Date Incident Discovered: 09/10/2024 at 6:00 a.m. Description of Incident: While making oncoming rounds, S7LPN noticed blood on Resident #9's sheets and visible bruising to forehead and left arm with a skin tear on left forearm Date Incident Discovered: 09/10/2024 at 11:00 a.m. Description of Incident: Resident #9 stated that Resident #10 beat him up last night because he wanted a cigarette and could not get it. Review of Resident #9's Discharge Summary from a local hospital dated 09/10/2024 revealed Resident #9 was discharged with the following diagnoses: Skin Tear of Left Forearm without Complication Injury of Head Abrasion of Left Ear Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/16/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 14, which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #10's Incident Report dated 09/10/2024 revealed the following, in part: Date Incident Discovered: 09/10/2024 11:00 a.m. Description of Incident: Resident #10 admitted to hitting Resident #9 last night because he wanted a cigarette and Resident #9 would not give him one. On 09/25/2024 at 10:26 a.m., an interview and observation was conducted with Resident #9. Resident #9 was noted to have a bandage to his left forearm. Resident #9 stated he had a scratch and denied knowing how it got there. On 09/25/2024 at 10:44 a.m., an interview was conducted with S7LPN. S7LPN stated on 09/10/2024 she made rounds on Resident #9 at 8:00 a.m. S7LPN stated she got Resident #9 up and saw he had blood on the bed sheets and his ear. S7LPN stated Resident #9' left arm had a large skin tear. S7LPN stated initially Resident #9 stated he did not know what happened. S7LPN stated when Resident #9 saw Resident #10 in the hall, Resident #9 stated that is who beat my a**. On 09/25/2024 at 12:42 p.m., an interview was conducted with S9WC. S9WC confirmed she assessed Resident #9 on 09/10/2024. S9WC stated during the assessment, Resident #10 walked up the hall and Resident #9 kept saying that is the one who did it to me. S9WC stated Resident #9's left ear had blood on the top outer portion of the auricle and his left eye was black. S9WC stated Resident #9's left forearm skin tear was superficial, measured 5 ½ cm x 1 ½ cm, and it appeared as if the skin had been flipped back. On 09/25/2024 at 1:23 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3CRO. S3CRO stated on 09/10/2024 Resident #10 told him the incident with Resident #9 happened the day before. S3CRO stated Resident #10 stated Resident #9 would not give him a cigarette so he beat him up. S3CRO confirmed Resident #10's actions towards Resident #9 was physical abuse. On 09/25/2024 at 2:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. S1DON confirmed the incident between Resident #9 and #10 was resident to resident physical abuse.
Jul 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect each residents' right to be free from phys...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect each residents' right to be free from physical abuse for 3 (#3, #5, and #9) of 16 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12 ,#13, #14, #15, and #16) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #3 and Resident #9 were free from physical abuse by Resident #4; and 2. Resident #5 was free from physical abuse by Resident #6. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy, with a revision date of March 2023, revealed the following, in part: Purpose: It is the policy of this facility and the state agency, to prohibit the abuse of patients/residents (henceforth referred to as resident). This facility is committed to preserving the right of each person receiving services to be free from abuse. All forms of abuse of residents by other residents of this facility are prohibited. Definitions: Physical abuse - physical contact such as hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, choking, and scratching. Review of facility's policy titled, Resident to Resident Abuse Policy, with no noted effective date, revealed the following, in part: Definitions: a. Willful - .means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. b. Abuse - . the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment, with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. 1. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Cerebrovascular Accident. Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/06/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Psychosis and Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/04/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 3, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the facility's state agency reportable incidents for Resident #3 revealed the following: Accused Allegations: Physical Abuse Date: 06/12/2024 Incident Description: Resident #3 was shoved in his wheelchair, and struck by another Resident 4. Review of Resident #3's Nurse's Note, entered by S7LPN, and dated 06/12/2024 at 6:05 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Resident #3 reported he was pushed in his chair, and hit in the head by another resident in the dining room. On 07/16/2024 at 3:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #3. He stated on 06/12/2024, Resident #4 pushed his wheelchair against the dining room table and kept pushing him. Resident #3 stated he told Resident #4 he could not go any further, and he hit me on the head. He stated it made him angry. On 07/18/2024 at 9:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S7LPN. She confirmed on 06/12/2024, Resident #3 reported to her Resident #4 shoved his wheelchair, and hit him in the head in the dining room. Review of the facility's video footage of the dining room was conducted on 07/17/2024 at 9:30 a.m. with S2DON who confirmed the below observation: Video footage dated 06/12/2024 beginning at 5:20 p.m.: Resident #3 was observed being rolled in his wheelchair into the dining room by Resident #4. Resident #4 was seen forcefully pushing Resident #3's wheelchair against the dining room table and hitting him on the head. Immediately following the observation, an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON confirmed Resident #4 pushed Resident #3's wheelchair forcefully against the dining room table and hit him in the head. She confirmed she considered the altercation physical abuse. Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Behavioral Syndrome Associated with Physiological Disturbance, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Other Psychoactive Substance Abuse. and COPD. Review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/07/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's state agency reportable incidents for Resident #9 revealed the following: Accused Allegations: Physical Abuse Date: 06/27/2024 Incident Description: Resident #9 was pushed to the floor and struck by another resident. Review of Resident #9's Nurse's Note, entered by S8LPN, and dated on 06/27/2024 at 5:00 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Resident #9 got into a physical altercation with Resident #4 in the dayroom. S8LPN was alerted to the incident when she heard another nurse call out for the two residents to stop. When S8LPN walked out the door she saw Resident #9 on the floor with Resident #4 standing over him punching him. The fight was broken up by security and the two residents were separated. On 07/16/2024 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #9. He stated on 06/27/2024, he was sitting in a chair in the dayroom and Resident #4 told him to get up, pushed him to the floor, and slapped him upside the head. He stated it made him angry. Review of the facility's video footage of dayroom was conducted on 07/17/2024 at 9:35 a.m. with S2DON who confirmed the below observation: Video footage dated 06/27/2024 at 5:08 p.m.: Resident #9 was observed seated in a chair to the right side of the doorway. Resident #4 was observed approaching Resident #9. Resident #9 stood up and was pushed to the floor by Resident #4, who then began punching him. Immediately following the observation, and interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON stated Resident #4 grabbed Resident #9 and pushed him to the floor with force and hit him. She confirmed she considered the altercation physical abuse. 2. Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Depression Unspecified, Unspecified Dementia Unspecified Severity, without behavior/psychosis/mood/anxiety. Review of Resident #5's Yearly MDS with an ARD of 04/15/2024 revealed the provider assessed the resident as having a BIMS of 7, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #6 Review of Resident #6's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Psychosis not due to a substance or known physical condition, Dementia, Unspecified Severity without behavior/psychosis, Disorder of Adult Persona, and other Conduct Disorders. Review of Resident #6's yearly MDS with an ARD of 05/21/2024 revealed the resident had a BIMS of 11, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the facility's state agency reportable incidents for Resident #6 revealed the following: Accused Allegations: Physical Abuse - substantiated after facility investigation. Date: 06/19/2024 Incident Description: Resident #6 pushed another resident's wheelchair to remove him from their shared room. Review of Resident #6's Nurse's Note, entered by S8LPN, and dated on 06/19/2024 at 8:28 a.m. revealed the following, in part: Resident #5 and Resident #6 got into an argument in their room. Resident #6 pushed Resident #5 out of the room by his wheelchair and Resident #6 was overheard saying he was going to punch Resident #5 in his face. On 07/16/2024 at 9:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10CNA. She stated she saw Resident #6 pushing Resident #5 in his wheelchair into the hallway. Stated Resident #5's wheelchair almost hit the hallway railing. Review of the facility's video footage of hallway outside of resident's room was conducted on 07/16/2024 at 10:00 a.m. with S15IT who confirmed the below observation: Video footage dated 06/19/2024 at 5:56 a.m.: Resident #5 was observed being forcefully pushed across hallway by Resident #6. On 07/16/2024 at 10:43 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10CNA. She stated she was standing in the hallway outside of Resident #5 and Resident #6's room when she observed Resident #5 being shoved out of his room in his wheelchair into the hallway by Resident #6. She stated Resident #5's wheelchair almost hit the hallway railing. She stated she would consider this abuse amongst residents. On 07/16/2024 at 12:25 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4RN. He stated he observed on the facility's video footage Resident #6's hands on Resident #5's wheelchair handles pushing Resident #5 out of their shared room into hallway. He stated it was not a gentle push. He stated he would consider the push to be a form of abuse because Resident #6's intent was malicious. On 07/17/2024 at 12:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She confirmed if a resident forcefully shoved another resident out of their shared room she would consider that a form of abuse.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents plan of care was revised by failing to update...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents plan of care was revised by failing to update behavior interventions after a verbal altercation for 1 (#1) of 16 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16) residents reviewed for care plans. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans-Nursing with a revision date of 05/2015 revealed the following, in part: II. Purpose: A. To provide an individualized nursing care plan to guide the resident's care . IV. Policy: B. The care plan for each resident must include: 2. Interventions: that describe the services you will employ to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. M. Document: 1. All pertinent .expected outcomes, nursing interventions, and evaluations of expected outcomes. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Multiple Myeloma Not Having Achieved Remission. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 06/04/2024 revealed the following, in part: Date/Time Incident Occurred: 06/04/2024 at 7:16 a.m. Date/Time Incident Discovered: 06/04/2024 at 7:16 a.m. Residents involved: Resident #1 and Resident #2 Description of Incident: Resident #1 was threatened with physical harm by Resident #2. Resident #2 told Resident #1 I'm going to beat you're a** like I did before. Witness: S6LPN Nurse completing report: S6LPN Review of Resident #1's Nurse's Notes dated 06/04/2024 revealed, in part, the following: At 7:17 a.m. Resident #1 involved in verbal altercation with Resident #2, Resident #1 was threatened by Resident #2 with physical harm. Resident #2 threatened to beat Resident #1's a**, stating I am going to beat you're a** like I did before. Signed by S6LPN At 3:19 p.m. Special staffed for verbal altercation and being threatened harm by Resident #2. Provided counseling and education. Resident #1 was encouraged not to have any interaction with Resident #2, do not engage and notify staff of any issues. Signed by S11MDS Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed it was not revised and did not include interventions to address behaviors after the verbal altercation that occurred on 06/04/2024 with Resident #2. On 07/17/2024 at 9:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6LPN. She said Resident #1 and Resident #2 had previous verbal incidents and one physical altercation. She said on 06/04/2024, Resident #1 and Resident #2 had a verbal altercation at the beginning of the shift. She said Resident #2 threatened Resident #1, saying I'm going to beat you're a** like I did the last time, referencing their previous physical altercation. She said Resident #1 cursed back at Resident #2 and rolled their wheelchairs up to each other like they were going to fight. She said S11MDS was responsible for updating the care plans and was aware of the incident. She reviewed Resident #1 care plan and confirmed it was not updated after the incident on 06/04/2024 and should have been. On 07/17/2024 at 10:43 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11MDS. She said she was responsible for updating the residents care plans. She said resident care plans were updated after any resident incidents. She said on 06/04/2024, she was notified there was verbal altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2. She said Resident #2 threatened to beat Resident #1's butt. She said after the incident, Resident #1 was counseled as an intervention to bring any issues to staff instead of trying to handle them on his own. She confirmed Resident #1's care plan was not updated after the 06/04/2024 incident and should have been. On 07/17/2024 at 12:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She said the facilities protocol after a resident incident was the treatment team met, discussed the incident, and came up with interventions to put in place. She said any interventions would then be updated on the resident's care plan. She said S11MDS was responsible for updating the care plans. She reviewed Resident #1 care plan and nurse's note dated 06/04/2024 at 3:19 p.m. by S11MDS and confirmed the interventions were not added to the care plan after the incident on 06/04/2024 and should have been.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when a residents had a change in condition f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when a residents had a change in condition for 3 (#12, #13, and #14) of 16 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Resident #12 Review of Resident #12's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Traumatic Brain Injury, Anoxic Brain Damage, and Impulse Disorder. Review of Resident #12's most recent MDS with an ARD of 05/15/2024, revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 0 which indicated the resident was severely impaired for cognition. Further review revealed the resident was independent with mobility and walking. Review of the facility's state agency reportable incidents for Resident #12 revealed the following: Abuse type in Review: Abuse Date: 06/25/2024 Incident Description: Allegation of nurse drugging resident #12. Review of Resident #12's Nurse's Notes revealed the following, in part: 06/25/2024 at 7:12 a.m., Resident #12 came to nurses station and stated his legs hurt, Tylenol given, walked back toward his room with CGT, and fell. S5LPN 06/25/2024 at 7:21 a.m., Nurse called down to Resident #12's room. Resident #12 fell again. S5LPN 06/25/2024 at 8:45 p.m. Resident #12 lethargic, confused and oriented to person only. Unclear speech and unsteady gait noted. Resident #12 stated, I am very sleepy and required assistance to sit on the side of the bed. Resident #12 unable to keep eyes open during assessment. S18RN On 07/15/2024 at 10:41 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She stated on the morning of 06/25/2024, Resident #12 stumbled, could not hold himself up, walked with his eyes closed and mumbled where she could not understand him. She confirmed these behaviors were not Resident #12's normal behaviors. She further confirmed Resident #12 remained drowsy her entire shift on 06/25/2024 and S12 RN was notified of the abnormal behaviors. Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Traumatic Brain Injury, Impulse Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #13's most recent MDS with an ARD of 04/26/2024, revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 3 which indicated the resident was severely impaired for cognition. Further review revealed the resident was independent with mobility and walking. Review of the facility's state agency reportable incidents for Resident #13 revealed the following: Abuse type in Review: Abuse Date: 06/25/2024 Incident Description: Allegation of nurse drugging resident #13. Review of Resident #13's Nurse's Notes revealed the following, in part: 06/25/2024 at 9:27 a.m., Resident #13 came up the hallway, gait unsteady, informed resident to go lie down or sit down before he falls. Resident #13 stated, I'm going smoke resident continued and fell backwards. Resident #13 assisted to w/c by staff and was taken to his room. S5LPN 06/25/2024 at 12:22 p.m., Resident #13 came from smoking area to eat lunch and fell to his knees. S5LPN 06/25/2024 at 3:12 p.m., Resident #13 still lethargic and will not remain in bed or wheelchair. Resident continued to walk unsteady. S5LPN 06/25/2024 at 8:01 p.m., Resident #13 lethargic with slurred speech. Resident #13 refused to utilize wheelchair for ambulation. Noted to have excessive secretions. S18RN On 07/15/2024 at 10:41 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She stated on the morning of 06/25/2024, Resident #13 was lethargic, fell repeatedly, could not get himself up off the floor, would not stay in the bed, and required constant redirection. She confirmed these behaviors were not Resident #13's normal behaviors. She further confirmed Resident #13 remained drowsy and unsteady her entire shift on 06/25/2024 and S12 RN was notified of the abnormal behaviors. On 07/15/2024 at 12:23 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12 RN. She stated on 06/25/2024 at 7:00 a.m. during her rounds, she was notified Resident #13 fell, was uncoordinated, and lethargic. She confirmed these behaviors were not Resident #13's normal behaviors. Resident #14 Review of Resident #14's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder, and Vascular Dementia. Review of Resident #14's most recent MDS with an ARD of 07/03/2024, revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 99 which indicated the resident could not complete the assessment and was severely impaired for cognition. Further review revealed the resident required extensive assistance with all ADL's. Review of the facility's state agency reportable incidents for Resident #14 revealed the following: Abuse type in Review: Abuse Date: 06/25/2024 Incident Description: Allegation of nurse drugging resident #14. Review of Resident #14's Nurse's Notes revealed the following: 06/25/2024 at 3:53 p.m., Resident #14 in bed with eyes closed, very lethargic and unable to keep his eyes open when aroused by the nurse. Will continue to monitor. S5LPN On 07/15/2024 at 10:41 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She stated on the morning of 06/25/2024, Resident #14 was lethargic, and she could not wake him. She stated she called the residents name, tapped his feet, pulled the cover down, and he did not open his eyes. She confirmed these behaviors were not Resident #14's normal behaviors. She further confirmed Resident #14 remained drowsy and asleep her entire shift on 06/25/2024 and S12 RN was notified of the abnormal behaviors. On 07/15/2024 at 12:23 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12 RN. She stated on 06/25/2024 during her rounds, S5LPN reported Resident #12, #13 and #14 had abnormal behaviors and found a box of Dollar General Sleep Aid and a bottle of Melatonin on her medication cart. She confirmed the S2DON was notified of Resident #12, #13 and #14's abnormal behaviors and OTC medications found in the cart. On 07/17/2024 at 11:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated on 06/25/2024 during rounds sometime before 2:00 p.m., S12 RN reported Resident #12, #13, and #14's abnormal behaviors and a box of Dollar General Sleep Aid and a bottle of Melatonin was found on the medication cart. On 07/17/2024 at 2:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S17MD. He stated he managed resident's behaviors and psychiatric medications and the NP managed the resident from a medical standpoint. He confirmed he was not aware of Resident #12, #13, and #14's abnormal behaviors on 06/25/2024. He further confirmed he was not aware of a box of Dollar General Sleep Aid and a bottle of Melatonin found on the medication cart and he absolutely should have been made aware.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported immediately, but not lat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the administrator and to the state survey agency for 2 (#7 and #16) of 16 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy with a revision date of 03/2023 revealed the following, in part: iv. Procedure to Report Abuse/Neglect-Any employee 1. To the Immediate Supervisor: Immediately, if at all possible, but in no case later than one hour after knowledge or suspicion, the written report shall be submitted to the RN supervisor as soon as possible, but no later than two hours after the verbal report. 9. Ensure that all reporting requirements are followed. vi. Client Rights Officer-The function of the Client Rights Officer is as follows: 2. At the direction of the Administrator, report allegations of abuse and neglect to the APS and assure that information is entered into the state Incident System. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident to Resident Abuse Policy with no revision date revealed the following, in part: v. Procedure to Report Abuse e. Administrator or designee will enter information into SIMS (Statewide Incident Management System) as required . Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Other Mental Disorders due to Known Physiological Condition, Major Depressive Disorder, and Alcohol Dependence with Alcohol-induced Persisting Dementia. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 06/25/2024 revealed the following, in part: Date/Time Incident Occurred: 06/25/2024 at 4:20 p.m. Date/Time Incident Discovered: 06/25/2024 at 4:20 p.m. Residents involved: Resident #7 and Resident #8 Description of Incident: Resident #8 noted agitated and stated to Resident #7 If I had a blade, I would cut your f***ing nuts off right this second. Witness: S14MD Nurse completing report: S16LPN Review of the Incident Report submitted to the state survey agency for Resident #7 revealed the following: Accused Allegations: Verbal Abuse Incident Occurred: 06/25/2024 at 4:20 p.m. Incident Discovered: 06/25/2024 at 4:20 p.m. Incident Reported/Entered: 06/25/2024 at 8:00 p.m. Incident Description: Resident #8 made a threatening statement towards Resident #7. Resident #8 stated to Resident #7 that, If I had a blade, I would cut your f****ing nuts off right this second. On 07/16/2024 at 8:56 a.m., an interview was conducted with S14MD. She said Resident #7 and Resident #8 were roommates. She said on 06/25/2024 she was in Resident #8's room, as he was psychotic and agitated due to hallucinations. She said Resident #8 said towards Resident #7, If I had a blade I would cut your f****ng nuts off right this second. She said Resident #8 was threatening and verbally abusive towards Resident #7 on 06/25/2024. She said she reported the incident immediately to S16LPN. On 07/15/2024 at 2:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S16LPN. She said on 06/25/2024, S14MD reported to her at 4:20 p.m., Resident #8 told Resident #7 that he would cut off his f****ing nuts. She said she reported the incident to S12RN within the hour and S12RN was to notify administrative staff. She said a resident threatening another resident was verbal abuse. On 07/15/2024 at 12:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12RN. She said on 06/25/2024 around 4:00 p.m., S16LPN reported to her Resident #8 made a threat he was going to cut Resident #7's balls off while in their room together. She confirmed it was an allegation of verbal abuse. She said she could not recall the time she reported the incident to S4RN, but knew it was prior to the two hour required time frame. On 07/16/2024 at 9:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4RN. He said he was responsible for submitting allegations of abuse to the state survey agency. He reviewed the above listed incident report for Resident #7 on 06/25/2024 at 4:20 p.m. He said on 06/25/2024, he did not recall when or by whom he was notified of the incident between Resident #7 and Resident #8. He recalled he was notified S14MD witnessed Resident #8 make the statement he wanted to harm his roommate, Resident #7, and cut his nuts off. He said the incident was threatening and an allegation of verbal abuse. He confirmed the allegation of verbal abuse was not reported to the state agency within the required two hour time frame. On 07/16/2024 at 9:24 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She reviewed the above listed incident report for Resident #7 and confirmed there was an allegation of verbal abuse. She confirmed the allegation of verbal abuse was not reported to the state survey agency within two hours and should have been. On 07/16/2024 at 11:16 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He stated S4RN was responsible for submitting allegations of abuse to the state survey agency. He reviewed the above listed incident report for Resident #7 and confirmed there was an allegation of verbal abuse. He said due to the threatening nature of the allegation it needed to be reported. He stated allegations of resident to resident verbal abuse should be reported to the state survey agency within two hours of being discovered. He confirmed the allegation was not reported to the state survey agency within the two hours as required. Resident #16 Review of Resident #16's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Vascular Dementia. Review of the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) for Resident #16 with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 06/09/2024 revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 3 which indicated the resident was severely impaired for cognition. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 07/10/2024 revealed the following, in part: Date/Time Incident Discovered: 07/10/2024 @ 5:12 p.m. Residents involved: Resident #16 Description of Incident: Resident #16 noted with contusion to the right check. Review of the Incident Report submitted to the state survey agency for Resident #16 revealed the following: Accused Allegations: Physical Abuse Incident Reported/Entered: 07/10/2024 at 5:41 p.m. Victim: Resident #16 Incident Description: Resident #16 reported that his assigned CNA beat him up last night. On 07/16/2024 at 2:28 p.m., an interview was conducted with S19SW. She stated on 07/10/2024 at 5:00 p.m., she made rounds and noticed Resident #16 had a bruise on his face. She stated Resident #16 reported last night the CNA beat him up. She stated she immediately reported the incident to S2DON On 07/17/2024 at 1:17 p.m., an interview was conducted with S9CNA. She stated on the morning of 07/10/2024 she noticed a bruise on Resident #16's face and he reported the night CNA beat him up. She stated she reported the allegation of abuse to S5LPN immediately. On 07/18/2024 at 2:16 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She stated on 07/10/2024 she noticed an abrasion on Resident #16's face, but did not know what occurred. She denied Resident #16 or any staff reported any allegations of abuse. She denied reporting the abrasion to her supervisor. On 07/18/2024 at 3:11 p.m. an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated an allegation of abuse reported to a staff nurse should be reported immediately to administration. She confirmed that Resident #16's allegation of abuse was reported at 5:00 p.m. She further confirmed the allegation should have been reported to the state agency within 2 hours of Resident #16 making the allegation of abuse to S9CNA.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days and indicated the duration for 4 (#4, #8, #13 and #14 ) of 16 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic/Psychotropic Medication Policy with no revision date revealed the following, in part: Purpose: Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period, and are subject to gradual dose reduction, and re-review by Physicians and mid-level providers to ensure appropriate use, evaluation and monitoring. Procedures: 1. The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. The duration of the PRN order will be indicated in the order. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Psychosis, and Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #4's July 2024 Physician's Orders revealed an order written on 06/27/2024 for Haldol 5 mg vial, give intramuscular injection every 8 hours as needed for severe agitation. Further review revealed the PRN medication had no stop date. An interview was conducted on 07/17/2024 at 12:00 p.m. with S2DON. She confirmed Haldol was a psychotropic medication and should have a stop date. She confirmed Resident #4 had an order on 06/27/2024 for PRN Haldol injection with no stop date. Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizophrenia, Panic Disorder Episodic, and Paroxysmal Anxiety. Review of Resident #8's July 2024 Physician's Orders revealed orders written on 01/24/2024 for Hydroxyzine [NAME] 25 mg, take one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety and on 06/26/2024 for Olanzapine 20 mg, take one half of a tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation. Further review revealed the PRN medications had no duration or stop dates. Review of Resident #8's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Hydroxyzine [NAME] 25 mg, take one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety was started on 01/24/2024 and Olanzapine 20 mg, take one half of a tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation was started on 06/26/2024. Further review revealed the PRN medications had no duration or stop dates. An interview was conducted on 07/16/2024 at 9:24 a.m. with S2DON. She reviewed Resident #8's current physician orders and verified on 01/24/2024, he was prescribed Hydroxyzine [NAME] 25 mg take one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety and confirmed there was no duration or stop date. She verified on 06/26/2024, Resident #8 was prescribed Olanzapine 20mg take one half tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation and confirmed there was no duration or stop date. She confirmed Hydroxyzine and Olanzapine were psychotropic medications and should have a stop date. She confirmed PRN psychotropic medications should be limited to 14 days. Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Traumatic Brain Injury, Impulse Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #13's July 2024 Physician's Orders revealed an order written on 04/18/2024 for Haldol 5 mg vial, give intramuscular injection every 6 hours as needed for agitation and Haldol 5 mg tablet, give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for aggression if resident will not allow injection. Further review revealed the PRN medication had no stop date. Review of Resident #13's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Haldol 5mg/ml, give 5 mg intramuscular injection every 6 hours as needed for aggression was started on 04/16/2024 and Haldol 5 mg tablet, give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for aggression if resident will not allow injection was started on 04/18/2024. Further review revealed the PRN medications had no duration or stop dates. An interview was conducted on 07/17/2024 at 11:35 a.m. with S2DON. She confirmed Haldol was a psychotropic medication and should have a stop date. She confirmed Resident #13 had an order on 04/18/2024 for PRN Haldol injection and tablet with no stop date. Resident #14 Review of Resident #14's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder and Vascular Dementia. Review of Resident #14's July 2024 Physician's Orders revealed an order written on 06/02/2024 for Zyprexa 10 mg every 8 hours as needed severe agitation. Further review revealed the PRN medication had no stop date. Review of Resident #14's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Zyprexa 10 mg every 8 hours as needed severe agitation was started on 06/02/2024. Further review revealed the PRN medication had no duration or stop date. An interview was conducted on 07/17/2024 at 11:35 a.m. with S2DON. She confirmed Zyprexa was a psychotropic medication and should have a stop date. She confirmed Resident #14 had an order on 06/02/2024 for PRN Zyprexa with no stop date.
Jun 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect each residents' right to be free from abus...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect each residents' right to be free from abuse for 3 (#8, #9, and #13) of 13 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #10, #11, #12 and #13) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect: 1. Resident #8 from mental abuse by S11CNA; 2. Resident #9 from physical abuse by Resident #10; and 3. Resident #13 from physical abuse by Resident #11. This deficient practice resulted in an actual psychosocial harm on 05/10/2024 around 6:00 p.m., when S11CNA made degrading comments about Resident #8's bowel condition loudly at the Nurses' Station with Resident #8 seated nearby. Resident #8 experienced crying, sadness, and felt degraded after S11CNA's comments about him. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy, with a revision date of March 2023, revealed the following, in part: Purpose: It is the policy of this facility and the state agency, to prohibit the abuse, neglect, exploitation, or extortion of patients/residents (henceforth referred to as resident). This facility is committed to preserving the right of each person receiving services to be free from abuse. All forms of abuse of residents by other residents or employees of this facility are prohibited. Definitions: Physical abuse - physical contact such as hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, choking, scratching. Verbal/Emotional/Psychological abuse - may be abusive because of either the manner of communication or the content of the communication; use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation or degradation; includes the use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds to residents, within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples include but are not limited to: harassing a resident, mocking, insulting, ridiculing, yelling . Mental abuse/Violation of Privacy - may occur through either verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation or degradation. 1. Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Acquired Absence of Right Leg Above Knee, and Acquired Absence of Left Leg Above Knee. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/05/2024 revealed he had a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #8's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: ADLs - I need help with dressing, bathing, and personal hygiene due to my Bilateral Above Knee Amputations and Chronic Diarrhea . Problem: Alteration in bowel elimination related to I am incontinent. Review of Resident #8's Nurse's Note dated 05/15/2024 at 12:15 a.m. revealed the following, in part: Tonight I assisted Resident #8 in writing a statement regarding the way he was treated by a staff member on night shift on 05/10/2024. Resident #8 reported to me that the staff member embarrassed him by stating comments about his stomach/bowel issues in front of other residents, causing Resident #8 to get upset and cry. Resident #8 stated he was reluctant to report staff member for fear of possibly being further mistreated. Statement given to shift manager and the CNA assignment changed so the staff member is not assigned to the resident tonight. Signed: S10LPN Review of Resident #8's Incident Report revealed the following, in part: Date incident occurred: 05/10/2024 Date incident discovered: 05/15/2024 at 12:30 a.m. Type of incident: alleged abuse - emotional/verbal abuse Description of incident: Statement from Resident #8: On 05/10/2024, I was sitting in my wheelchair when the night shift arrived. S11CNA stated to me that she hoped I did not s*** my chair up the way that I s*** my bed up. S11CNA claimed she did not have time for that tonight. S11CNA said out in the hallway outside the day room and Nurses' Station in front of multiple other residents which was very embarrassing to me. I then rolled outside where the smoking area was and actually cried thinking this is how I have to live and I don't want to inconvenience anyone, but at the same time I have never been rude to S11CNA before. My feelings were hurt and I was embarrassed. When I rolled back into the building, I then told my nurse that I was ready to go to bed. I can put myself back to bed on my own. My nurse, S10LPN, then stuck her head out the smoking area door and stated to S11CNA that I would like to go to bed and would she please go and ensure that my bed was ready and that I was not soiled. At this time, S11CNA yelled at S10LPN, he can put himself to bed, she didn't have time to be bothered with my a**, and that I shouldn't be up in my chair anyway. S10LPN then came back into the building, and S12CNA came with her and ensured I was in bed and dry. Signed: Resident #8. Signature of person completing this form: S8RNM 05/15/2024 Supervisor review: do you suspect abuse or neglect? yes. On 06/04/2024 at 10:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #8. He stated, on 05/10/2024, he was by the medication cart outside the Nurses' Station at shift change, around 6:00 p.m. when S11CNA came out of the Nurses' Station and said something like, I hope you don't mess up the chair because you're hard enough to clean already. He stated S9LPN and S10LPN were at the medication cart giving report and heard the comments S11CNA made. He stated the comment made him feel bad, he went by the big window in the front of the facility, and cried and wondered what he did to end up here in this position. He stated after some time, he came back inside and asked for assistance getting back in bed. He stated S10LPN and S11CNA had words, S11CNA refused to assist him back to bed, and S10LPN and S12CNA assisted him back to bed. He stated he had chronic diarrhea for a long time and struggled with Depression because he never saw himself being in a place like this. He stated after the incident, he was sad for a few days. On 06/04/2024 at 10:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S13CNA. She confirmed she was assigned to Resident #8 today. She stated she was aware of the incident that occurred on 05/10/2024 with Resident #8 and S11CNA. She stated following the incident, Resident #8 was sad about the situation and did not get out of the bed for a couple days. On 06/04/2024 at 1:34 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S8RNM. She stated an incident occurred between Resident #8 and S11CNA on 05/10/2024, and she was made aware of the incident on the night shift of 05/14/2024. She stated Resident #8 was very [NAME] and quiet. She stated Resident #8 was tearful when he explained to her that S11CNA said I hope you don't s*** your chair like you s*** your bed. She stated Resident #8 reported the incident occurred in front of other residents, S10LPN and S9LPN. She confirmed the above described incident was verbal and emotional abuse and when S11CNA was removed from Resident #8's unit, he began coming out of his room and engaging with other residents and staff. On 06/05/2024 at 9:32 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S9LPN. She stated Resident #8 was always very pleasant, friendly, and never had any behaviors. She stated, on 05/10/2024 at shift change, in a very loud in frustrated tone, S11CNA complained that Resident #8 was still up and every time he gets back in bed, he gets s*** everywhere and she did not want to clean it up. She stated Resident #8 was up in his wheelchair at the time the statement was made but was unsure of his exact location. She stated Resident #8 would have been able to hear the statements made by S11CNA if he was seated outside the Nurses' Station. She explained if Resident #8 overheard S11CNA, he would be very upset because he was generally very bothered and emotional related to his chronic diarrhea. She confirmed the statements made by S11CNA were very disrespectful. On 06/05/2024 at 2:04 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S11CNA. She confirmed Resident #8 had frequent diarrhea. She stated she never had a conversation with anyone about Resident #8's bowel movements. She stated she did not recall ever making a comment about Resident #8's bowel movements or him having a bowel movement in his chair or his bed. She stated if she had, that would have been abuse. Telephone interviews were unsuccessful with S10LPN on 06/04/2024 at 12:17 p.m., 06/04/2024 at 2:45 p.m., 06/05/2024 at 8:15 a.m., 06/0 5/2024 at 10:41 a.m., 06/05/2024 at 1:07 p.m., and 06/05/2024 at 2:51 p.m. Review of the State Agency Investigator's Report for Resident #8 revealed the following, in part: Incident date: 05/10/2024 Discovered: 05/15/2024 Alleged Victim: Resident #8 Statement by S10LPN: On 05/10/2024, I was working the night shift, Resident #8 was in his wheelchair outside of the Nurses' Station, as well as S11CNA. I could not really make out what was being said, but voices were raised and then all residents along with S11CNA went out to the smoking area. When I walked out back to this area, Resident #8 was in his wheelchair and had rolled down the sidewalk away from everyone else. Resident #8 appeared to be upset and possibly had been crying. After ten minutes, Resident #8 came back inside the building and stated he was ready to get in his bed. I went to get S11CNA, and informed her Resident #8 was ready to get into his bed. S11CNA began to yell at me outside in front of other residents. She said I don't have time to fool with him right now, he shouldn't even be up right now. I then came back into the building and was assisted by S12CNA to get Resident #8 in bed. I then asked the resident while in his room what was wrong and if something had happened. Resident #8 told me he didn't understand why staff were mean because he was never mean to anyone. He also told me how he can't help he has bad diarrhea, does not want to be like this, and surely doesn't do it on purpose. I encouraged the resident to report staff when they are mean and explained to him that is abuse. Resident stated that he was afraid to make anything worse but that he would think about it and let me know if he decided to report anything. When I came back to work, my RN Manager came to me and told me to go and help Resident #8 do a statement since he can't write. Statement done and signed by resident. Even though I did not hear exactly what S11CNA said to the resident, the attitude she had toward myself and the resident was not therapeutic and not conducive to patient care. Whatever S11CNA did say to the resident upset him enough that his demeanor changed to very sad and he obviously had been crying as it appeared he had tears in his eyes. On 06/05/2024 at 12:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6APS. He confirmed he investigated an allegation S11CNA emotionally abused Resident #8. He confirmed he interviewed S10LPN during his investigation. He stated S10LPN reported she did not hear S11CNA say anything directly to Resident #8 but when she went outside there were a lot of other residents outside and they were laughing and Resident #8 appeared to be crying. He stated S10LPN reported S11CNA was yelling at her as well. He stated S10LPN explained based on how Resident #8 reacted and S11CNA acted, she believed Resident #8 was abused by S11CNA. On 06/05/2024 at 4:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated Resident #8 had never made false reports against staff and was a very pleasant resident. She stated if S11CNA said what Resident #8 accused her of, that was abuse. On 06/05/2024 at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5AA. He confirmed a state agency investigator investigated the allegation S11CNA abused Resident #8. He stated he reviewed the state agency investigator's report and investigation. He confirmed he substantiated the allegation because there was enough evidence to show S11CNA mentally abused Resident #8. 2. Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Cerebral Infarction and Unspecified Psychosis. Review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS with an ARD 04/18/2024 revealed a BIMS of 3, which indicated resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #10's Nurse's Notes dated 05/18/2024 at 11:34 a.m. by S14RN revealed Resident #9 was bumping into Resident #10's Gerichair several times, Resident #9 grabbed Resident #10 and scratched Resident #10's nose. On 06/04/2024 at 1:22 p.m., an interview was conducted with S16LPN. S16LPN stated Resident #10 does not like noise and will curse at others when agitated. S16LPN stated if you are close enough to Resident #10 he will grab at you. Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Moderately Intellectual Disabilities, Epilepsy, Schizophrenia and Extrapyramidal Movement Disorder. Review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/09/2024 revealed a BIMS of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #10's Nurse's Notes dated 05/18/2024 at 9:38 a.m. by S17LPN revealed Resident #9 bumped into Resident#10's Geri chair several times, Resident #10 then grabbed Resident #9's face and scratched the right side of Resident #9's nose. Upon exam slight bleeding to right side, cleansed TAO applied. On 06/04/2024 at 1:58 p.m., an observation of the surveillance video was made with S18APD. On 05/18/2024 at approximately 9:38 a.m. both Resident #9 and Resident #10 were in the day room. Resident #9 backed up his wheelchair next to Resident #10's Geri chair, Resident #9 then leaned over Resident #10 and raised her right arm, Resident #10 immediately swatted his left arm and grabbed at Resident #9's face. Security immediately stepped in and separated both residents. On 06/04/2024 at 1:59 p.m., an interview was conducted with S18APD. S18APD confirmed Resident #10 grabbed Resident #9's face and it was considered physical abuse. 06/05/2024 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3CRO. S3CRO stated he was responsible for completing incident reports. S3CRO and S18APD reviewed surveillance of the incident that occurred between Resident #9 and Resident #10. S3CRO confirmed physical abuse occurred. 3. Resident #11 Review of Resident #11's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Unspecified Intracranial Injury with Loss of Consciousness, Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Other Frontotemporal Neurocognitive Disorder, and Amnestic Disorder due to Known Physiological Condition. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/29/2024 revealed a BIMS of 1, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Personal History of Other Mental and Behavioral Disorders. Review of Resident #13's annual MDS with an ARD of 02/29/2024 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #13's Nurse's Note dated 05/19/2024 at 5:17 p.m. by S4RN revealed I heard yelling in the hallway by the dining room door. I saw Resident #13 on the floor next to his rollator walker. Resident #13 reported he could not get out of Resident #11's way, and Resident #11 pushed him to the floor. On 06/04/2024 at 10:54 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #13. He stated a few weeks ago Resident #11 pushed him to the floor while he was waiting to go into the dining area. He denied any pain or injuries as a result of this incident. On 06/04/2024 at 11:51 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4RN. She stated she recalled the incident that took place between Resident #11 and Resident #13. She stated she was in the hallway when she heard a lot of noise and commotion. She stated upon assessment of the noise, she observed Resident #13 sitting on the floor with his rollator walker next to him. She stated Resident #13 was cognitively intact, and when she asked him what happened, he stated, I couldn't get out of Resident #11's way fast enough so he pushed me out the way. On 06/05/2024 at 1:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3CRO. S3CRO confirmed he reviewed the video footage from 05/19/2024 involving Resident #11 and #13. He stated Resident #11 grabbed Resident #13 and pushed him to the floor with force. He confirmed he considered the altercation physical abuse. On 06/05/2024 at 2:01 p.m., an observation of the facility's surveillance footage was conducted with S2DON. On 05/19/2023 at 5:19 p.m., Resident #13 was observed standing in the hallway near the exit of the dining room door when Resident #11 forcefully shoved Resident #13 to the floor with both hands. Immediately following the observation, and interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON stated Resident #11 grabbed Resident #13 and pushed him to the floor with force. She confirmed she considered the altercation physical abuse.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive care plan by failing to implement and document increased behavior monitoring for 1 (#9) of 5 (#3, #4, #5, #6, and #9) residents reviewed for increased monitoring for behaviors. Findings: Review of facility's policy titled, Observation Precautions, dated 08/08/2023, revealed, in part: Purpose: Observation precautions are instituted for situations where the resident's condition/behavior presents as a clear and present risk to himself, others or the environment. Definitions: Increased Observation-staff members are assigned to observe an individual resident more frequently than traditional rounds. Increased observation may be completed in 15 minute intervals. Procedure: Documentation and Reporting: a. A form specific to the documentation of observation precautions shall be maintained with entries noted every 15 minutes by assigned staff and every 2 hours by a nurse. b. Documentation completion is required to the end of the assigned employee's shift. Review of Resident #9's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/06/2018 with diagnoses which included Moderate Intellectual Disabilities, Schizophrenia and Extrapyramidal Movement Disorder. Review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS with ARD 05/09/2024 revealed a BIMS of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Physician Order dated 05/18/2024 for Resident #9 revealed, in part: Increased observations every 15 minutes monitor for behavior. Review of Observation Precaution sheets dated 05/18/2024 through 06/04/2024 revealed on the following days the monitoring was not conducted: 1. 05/18/2024-no q15 minute documentation at 5:45 p.m. 2. 05/19/2024-no q15 documentation at 6:00 p.m. through 6:00 a.m. 3. 05/20/2024-no q2 hour nurse documentation at 6:00 p.m. through 6:00 a.m. 4. 05/21/2024-no q15 minute documentation at 6:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. 5. 05/21/2024-no q15 documentation at 6:00 p.m. through 6:00 a.m. 6. 05/22/2024-no q15 documentation at 6:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. 7. 05/22/2024-no q15 documentation at 6:00 p.m. through 6:00 a.m. 8. 05/23/2024-no q15 documentation at 8:45 a.m. through 9:45a.m. and 10:15 a.m. through 11:15 a.m. 9. 05/23/2024-no q15 minute documentation at 6:00 p.m. through 6:00 a.m. 10. 05/24/2024-no q 2 hour nurse documentation at 6:00 p.m. through 6:00 a.m. 11. 05/25/2024-no q15 minute documentation at 6:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. 12. 05/26/2024-no q15 minute documentation at 6:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. 13. 05/27/2024-no q15 minute documentation at 6:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. 14. 05/28/2024-no q15 minute documentation at 6:00 p.m. through 6:00 a.m. 15. 05/29/2024-no q15 minute documentation at 6:00 p.m. through 6:00 a.m. 16. 06/03/2024-no q15 minute documentation at 3:15 p.m. through 5:45 p.m. On 06/04/2024 at 1:22 p.m., an interview was conducted with S16LPN. S16LPN stated Resident #9 was on increased observations for behaviors since 05/18/2024. S16LPN stated rounding and documentation should occur every 15 minutes, and confirmed if the documentation was not completed, then the observation was not done. On 06/05/2024 at 9:16 a.m., an interview was conducted with S19LPN. S19LPN stated residents on increased observations required observations every 15 minute. S19LPN reported she had not completed an Observation Precaution sheet on Resident #9 in a month or two. S19LPN confirmed if documentation was not completed on the resident, then observations were not done. On 06/05/2024 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3CRO. S3CRO stated residents placed on increased observations for behaviors should be documented and rounded on every 15 minutes. S3CRO confirmed if the documentation was not completed, then the observation was not done. On 06/05/2024 at 11:29 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON stated increased observations could be conducted by security or a medical professional. S2DON reported all observations precautions should be documented on rounding sheets. S2DON verbalized the expectation was that the nurse documented observations every 2 hours and the CNA documented every 15 minutes. S2DON stated the above documents were not completed correctly. S2DON confirmed if the observation for behaviors was not documented on the Observation Precaution sheet, it was not done.
Nov 2023 7 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physic...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 3 (#RF7, #F47, and #F125) of 11 (#F6, #F11, #F13, #F75, #F47, #F120, #F125, #F132, #F338, #RF7, and #RF8) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #RF7 was free from physical abuse by Resident #F132; 2. Resident #F47 and Resident #F125 were free from physical abuse by each other. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #RF7 on 01/05/2024 at 12:41 p.m. when he was punched in the face by Resident #F132 and sustained multiple facial fractures. Resident #RF7 took a canned beverage from Resident #F132's meal tray and Resident #F132 approached Resident #RF7 and punched him in the face. As a result, Resident #RF7's diagnostic scans revealed fractures to the Left Inferior Medial Orbital Floor, Superior Medial Maxillary Sinus Wall, Inferior Medial Orbital Wall, Left Inferior Lateral Maxillary Sinus Wall, and Anterior Inferior Maxillary Sinus Wall and blood and fluid in the Left Maxillary Sinus. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #F47 and Resident #F125 on 01/23/2024 at 11:25 a.m. when Resident #F125 removed the wheelchair arm rest and struck Resident #F47 on the right hand. Resident #F47 then approached and hit Resident #F125 on the right side of the head with his wheelchair arm rest. As a result, Resident #F47's diagnostic scans revealed a fracture to the Right Index Proximal Phalanx Fracture of the Second Finger. Resident #F125 was sent to emergency room where he received a CT of his Maxillofacial Structures and brain due to contusion and swelling of head. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy revealed the following, in part: A. Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to prohibit the abuse of residents. This facility is committed to preserving the right of each person receiving services to be free from abuse. All forms of abuse of residents by other residents are prohibited. b. Abuse - the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment, with resulting physical harm . i. Physical Abuse - physical contact such as hitting . 1. Resident #F132 Review of Resident #F132's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #F132's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/20/2023 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #F132's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: 01/05/2024 - Hit another resident for taking his food. Review of Resident #F132's Nurse's Note dated 01/05/2024 at 12:55 p.m. revealed the following, in part: SF5LPN was summoned to hallway by staff. SF5LPN visualized Resident #F132 standing in front of Resident #RF7. Resident #F132 stated, don't touch anything on my f****** walker again, and punched Resident #RF7 in his left eye. Once Resident #F132 was calmed, he stated, he stole my cold drink off my walker when I walked in the dining room. Signed: SF5LPN Review of the Resident #F132's Incident Report dated 01/05/2024 at 12:38 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Where incident occurred: Hall Type of incident: resident to resident activity Description of incident: while conducting watch in the kitchen SF9CGT heard an argument outside in the hall. At this time, SF9CGT saw SF10C and SF8CGT in front of Resident #F132 who was cursing at Resident #RF7 saying you stole my f****** drink. Witnessed: SF8CGT, SF10C, and SF11C. Completed by: SF9CGT Review of Resident #F132's Post Incident Huddle Report dated 01/05/2024 revealed the following, in part: Interventions needed or provided after the incident: order for increased observation due to hitting Resident #RF7 in the left eye. Any previous incidents: No Resident #RF7 Review of Resident #RF7's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Unspecified Impulse Disorder. Review of Resident #RF7's MDS with an ARD of 11/24/2023 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #RF7's Incident Report dated 01/05/2024 at 12:45 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Where incident occurred: Hall Type of incident: resident to resident activity Description of Incident: See Nurses' Note Assessment: Small scratch noted under right eye. Nurse completing report: SF4RN Review of Resident #RF7's Nurse's Note dated 01/05/2024 at 1:08 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Unwitnessed resident to resident altercation: nurse writer was in dining hall serving lunch, during this time altercation was heard outside of the door, upon walking to the area, the nurse writer witnessed Resident #RF7 and Resident #F132 in a verbal confrontation but were separated by security staff. Upon nurse writer interviewing residents, Resident #F132 was yelling stating that Resident #RF7 had taken his soda from meal tray, and Resident #RF7 was yelling Resident #F132 had hit him in the face. Assessment was completed. Small scratch noted under left eye. Signed: SF4RN Review of the facility's video footage of the hallway leading to the dining room from Resident #F132 and Resident #RF7's units was conducted on 01/11/2024 at 9:17 a.m. with SF6APM who confirmed the below observation: Video footage dated 01/05/2024 beginning at 12:40 p.m.: Resident #RF7 took a canned drink off of a tray resting on a rollator walker outside of the dining room. Resident #RF7 proceeded to propel himself up the hallway toward the day room with the canned drink. Resident #F132 then exited the dining room and spoke with a resident seated in the hallway. Resident #F132 immediately ambulated with his rollator walker and approached Resident #RF7. At 12:41 p.m., Resident #F132 stood in front of Resident #RF7 and hit Resident #RF7 in his face with his right fist then left fist. Resident #RF7 then crossed both of his arms in front of his face and SF10C intervened. An observation was made of Resident #RF7 on 01/10/2024 at 1:58 p.m. He had bruising surrounding his left eye. He had purplish-red bruising under his left eye and yellowish bruising laterally. He had a purple discoloration on the left side of his mouth. He had a large section of purple discoloration on his neck. His left eye and cheek were visibly swollen compared to the right side of his face. An interview was conducted with Resident #RF7 on 01/10/2024 at 2:00 p.m. He stated, on 01/05/2024, he was trying to pass Resident #F132 in the hallway when the other resident punched him on his left eye. An interview was conducted with Resident #F132 on 01/10/2024 at 2:39 p.m. He stated, on 01/05/2024 at lunch time, he retrieved his meal tray and placed it on the seat of his rollator to go back to his room to eat. He stated he left the rollator in the hallway while he went back into the dining room to get ketchup, and when he came back out, Resident #RF7 had taken his cold drink off of his tray. He stated he then went to Resident #RF7 and punched him in the face. An interview was conducted with SF4RN on 01/10/2024 at 2:30 p.m. She stated, on 01/05/2024, there was an incident involving Resident #RF7 and Resident #F132. She stated she heard a commotion in the hallway leading to the dining room, and then, saw security separating the two residents. She stated security reported to her Resident #F132 punched Resident #RF7 in the face. She stated immediately following the incident, Resident #RF7 had bruising under his left eye. She stated Resident #RF7 did not normally have any discoloration to his face or neck. She confirmed Resident #F132 physically abused Resident #RF7. An interview was conducted with SF5LPN on 01/11/2024 at 10:12 a.m. She stated, on 01/05/2024, she was assigned to Resident #F132. She stated she reported to the hallway outside of the dining room around lunch because a staff member was yelling for help. She stated when she arrived, Resident #F132 was standing in front of Resident #RF7. She stated Resident #F132 then punched Resident #RF7 in the face with a closed fist. She confirmed Resident #F132 punching Resident #RF7 in the face was physical abuse. She stated immediately following the incident, Resident #F132 was placed on increased observation and was educated to notify staff if another resident takes something from him. An interview was conducted with SF11C on 01/11/2024 at 10:21 a.m. She stated, on 01/05/2024 around lunch, she heard Resident #F132 and Resident #RF7 yelling in the hallway leading to the dining room. She stated Resident #F132 then punched Resident #RF7 in the eye with a closed fist. She stated SF10C, SF9CGT, and SF8CGT separated the residents. She confirmed Resident #F132 punching Resident #RF7 in the face was physical abuse. She stated she had never seen Resident #F132 become physically aggressive prior to this incident. A telephone interview was conducted with SF10C on 01/11/2024 at 11:21 a.m. He stated he recalled the incident involving Resident #F132 and Resident #RF7 on 01/05/2024. He stated when he first walked up, Resident #F132 hit Resident #RF7 in the face with a closed fist. He stated Resident #RF7 was screaming for help. He stated he separated the two residents. He stated immediately following the incident, Resident #RF7 had a bruise and swelling around his left eye. He confirmed Resident #F132 physically abused Resident #RF7. He stated he had never seen Resident #F132 become physically aggressive prior to this incident. An interview was conducted with SF8CGT on 01/11/2024 at 11:28 a.m. He stated, around 12:45 p.m. on 01/05/2024, he was in the dining area, and Resident #F132 and Resident #RF7 were in the hallway leading to the dining area. He stated he heard commotion going on in the hallway, and he responded. He stated by the time he got there, Resident #F132 was standing over Resident #RF7, and Resident #F132 hit Resident #RF7 in the face with a closed fist. He confirmed Resident #F132 physically abused Resident #RF7. He stated he had never seen Resident #F132 become physically aggressive prior to this incident. He stated immediately following the incident, Resident #F132 was placed on increased observation. An interview was conducted with SF9CGT on 01/11/2024 at 11:52 a.m. She stated, on 01/05/2024 at lunch, she was in the dining area. She stated Resident #F132 and Resident #RF7 were in the hallway leading to the dining room. She stated she heard hollering and approached the situation. She stated when she responded the residents were being separated, and Resident #F132 was yelling and saying Resident #RF7 stole his cold drink. She stated Resident #RF7 was wheelchair bound, and Resident #F132 walked around and was more mobile than Resident #RF7. She stated Resident #F132 punching Resident #RF7 in the face was physical abuse. She stated she had never seen Resident #F132 become physically aggressive prior to this incident. An interview was conducted with SF7LPN on 01/10/2024 at 2:13 p.m. She stated she was currently assigned to Resident #RF7. She confirmed Resident #RF7 had bruising surrounding his left eye from an incident between him and Resident #F132. She confirmed one resident punching another resident was physical abuse. She stated SF2NP ordered facial x-rays for Resident #RF7 on 01/08/2024 related to his facial bruising. She stated after SF2NP received Resident #RF7's x-ray report, he ordered a facial CT. An interview was conducted with SF3CRN on 01/11/2024 at 2:07 p.m. He stated he was responsible for abuse investigations. He stated after the incident occurred with Resident #F132 and Resident #RF7 on 01/05/2024, he reviewed the facility's camera footage. He stated Resident #F132's rollator was out in the hallway leading to the dining room with a meal tray and cold drink. He stated Resident #RF7 was also in the hallway and took Resident #F132's cold drink off of the tray. He stated when Resident #F132 returned to his rollator, another resident in the hallway notified Resident #F132 that Resident #RF7 took his cold drink. He stated then, Resident #F132 confronted Resident #RF7 and punched him in the face. He confirmed Resident #F132 physically abused Resident #RF7, and Resident #RF7 received facial fractures from the incident. He stated immediately following the incident, Resident #F132 was placed on increased observation. Review of Resident #RF7's X-ray Report dated 01/08/2024 at 11:58 a.m. revealed the following, in part: Exam: XR facial bones 3 views Indications: Altercation Impression: Limited examination with evidence of air-fluid level in the left maxillary sinus and possible fractured tooth, likely in the left mandible (the orbital floor appears intact although the limited views do not totally exclude possibility of orbital floor blowout fracture as a source of the left maxillary fluid). Review of Resident #RF7's Hospital Records from a local hospital dated 01/10/2024 revealed the following, in part: ED triage description of symptoms: Was hit in the face by other patient. Physical Exam: Head traumatic with ecchymosis of the left face. CT facial dated 01/10/2024 at 7:13 p.m.: Clinical indication: contusion, swelling Impression: There is a left inferior medial orbital floor and superior medial maxillary sinus wall with mild comminuted fragments and the mild comminuted fragments may be exaggerated by motion artifact. Majority of the inferior orbital wall is intact with only fracture at the inferior medial aspect .There is also fractures of the left inferior lateral maxillary sinus wall and anterior inferior maxillary sinus wall with mild depression and partially comminuted with partial opacification of the left maxillary sinus with blood and fluid. A telephone interview was conducted with SF2NP on 01/11/2024 at 8:56 a.m. He confirmed Resident #F132 punched Resident #RF7 in the face on 01/05/2024. He stated he ordered x-rays to Resident #RF7's face to be completed on 01/08/2024 related to his facial bruising from the incident. He stated the x-rays were unclear so he ordered a computed tomography scan, which was completed at a local hospital on [DATE]. SF2NP confirmed Resident #RF7 received facial fractures when Resident #F132 punched him in the face. An interview was conducted with SF1AA on 01/11/2024 at 2:44 p.m. He confirmed Resident #F132 punched Resident #RF7 in the face on 01/05/2024, which was physical abuse. He stated immediately following the incident, Resident #F132 was placed on increased observation. 2. Resident # F47 Review of Resident # F47's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Quadriplegia. Review of Resident # F47's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 12/19/2023 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #F47's Nurse's Notes dated 01/23/2024 at 12:20 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Resident #F47 came to the nurse's station and reported to SF20CNA that Resident #F125 hit him with his wheelchair armrest. SF20CNA reported the incident to SF19LPN. SF19LPN saw Resident #F47's index finger was dislocated, swollen, and painful and she began to ask Resident #F47 what happened. Resident #F47 stated, he was in the bathroom and Resident #F125 was trying to come in and he told him he could not come in and to get out. Resident #F125 took off his armrest and hit him. Resident #F47 stated he took off his armrest and hit Resident #F125 since he hit him. Resident #F47 was instructed to stay at nurse's station while SF19LPN went to assess Resident#F125. Signed SF19LPN Review of Resident #F47's Incident report dated 01/23/2024 at 11:25 a.m. revealed the following, in part: Where incident occurred: Resident's room Type of incident: Resident to resident activity Description of incident: See Nurse's note Witnessed: None Completed by: SF21RNS Review of Resident #F47's Post Incident Huddle Report dated 01/23/2024 revealed, in part: Interventions needed or provided after the incident: Resident sent to local hospital for evaluation of finger. Environmental factors or equipment involved: armrest of wheelchair. Any previous incidents: No Review of Resident #F47's hospital records X-ray Report dated 01/23/2024 revealed the following, in part: Exam: Right Index Finger- 3 views Indications: Pain Impression: Acute essentially non-displaced fracture of the proximal metadiaphyseal junction of the proximal phalanx. There is prominent dorsal angulation. No other fractures. No destructive lesions. Exam: XR Finger RT min 2V Indications: Post Reduction Impression: Proximal phalanx fracture of the second finger has been reduced. Overlying cast material obscures osseous detail. Review of Resident #F47's current physician's orders revealed, in part: Start date: 01/23/2024 Hydrocodone/APAP 5-325mg until Hydrocodone/APAP 7.5-325mg is available Review of Resident #F47's Medication Administration Record for January 2024 revealed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325mg was administered once on 01/23/2024 and twice on 01/24/2024. Resident #F47 received Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 7.5-325mg once on 01/25/2024. An observation was made of Resident #F47 on 01/24/2024 at 12:57 p.m. Resident #F47's right hand from fingertips to wrist was noted to be wrapped with gauze and an ace wrap. Resident #F47's right index and middle fingers were noted to be splinted. An interview was conducted with Resident #F47 on 01/24/2024 at 12:57 p.m. He stated on 01/23/2024 when he came out of his bathroom Resident #F125 hit him with a wheelchair arm rest on his right hand. Resident #F47 stated his pain was currently a 7 out of 10. He stated the splint was uncomfortable. Resident #47 stated his hand hurts when he touches things. He stated his right hand was his dominant hand and since the altercation staff had to do more for him. He stated staff had to bath, dress, and help him get in the wheelchair and did not have to prior to the incident on 01/23/2024. An interview was conducted with Resident #F47 on 01/25/2024 at 12:30 p.m. He stated his right hand still ached. Review of Resident #F125's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, in part: Unspecified Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction, and Personality Disorder. Review of Resident #F125's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 11/17/2023 revealed a BIMS of 99, which indicated the BIMS could not be completed. Review of Resident #F125's Care Plan revealed, in part: Problem: onset 01/23/2024-I have had an actual Injury/Behavior Review of Resident #F125's Nurses Notes dated 01/23/2024 at 12:19 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Resident #F125 was sitting in WC on side of his bed, right eye was swollen, bleeding, and bruised. When Resident #F125 was asked what happened he stated someone hit me. Signed SF19LPN Review of Resident #F125's Incident report dated 01/23/2024 at 11:25 a.m. revealed the following, in part: Where incident occurred: Resident's room Type of incident: Resident to resident activity Description of incident: See Nurse's note Witnessed: None Completed by: SF21RNS Review of Resident #F125's Post Incident Huddle Report dated 01/23/2024 revealed, in part: Interventions needed or provided after the incident: Resident was sent to ER via ambulance for evaluation of eye trauma s/p altercation. Environmental factors or equipment involved: armrest of wheelchair Any previous incidents: No Review of Resident #F125's Hospital Records dated 01/23/2024 revealed the resident received a CT of his Maxillofacial Structures as indicated due to contusion and swelling. Further review revealed he received a CT of the Brain without contrast as indicated due to head injury. No abnormalities were noted. An observation was made of Resident #F125 on 01/24/2024 at 1:16 p.m. Resident #F125's right eye was noted to have dry scabbing and discoloration to the corner and under the eye. An interview was conducted with Resident #F125 on 01/24/2024 at 1:16 p.m. Resident #F125 stated he did not recall an altercation with another resident. Resident #F125 could not answer probing questions. An interview was conducted with SF21RNS on 01/24/2024 at 1:30 p.m. She stated she completed the incident investigation and post huddle incident form for the altercation between Residents #F47 and #F125. She confirmed the altercation between Resident #F47 and #F125 was a form of physical abuse. A telephone interview was conducted with SF19LPN on 01/25/2024 at 11:17 a.m. She confirmed SF20CNA notified her of the altercation between Resident #F47 and Resident #F125. She confirmed Resident #F47's index finger was dislocated, swollen, and painful. She confirmed Resident #F125's right eye was swollen, bleeding, and bruised. She confirmed she dressed Resident #F125's right eye with a gauze dressing. An interview was conducted with SF18DON on 01/25/2024 at 4:23 p.m. She confirmed the altercation between Resident #F47 and #F125 was resident to resident physical abuse. An interview was conducted with SF17ADM on 01/25/2024 at 4:35 p.m. He stated he was informed of the altercation between Resident #F47 and #F125 on 01/23/2024 by SF21RN. He confirmed the details of altercation stating Resident #F125 attempted to enter the bathroom in his designated room, his roommate Resident #F47 was occupying the bathroom. Resident #F125 began yelling at Resident #F47 to hurry up. Resident #F125 then entered the bathroom, removed his detachable armrest from his wheelchair and stuck Resident #F47 on the hand. Resident #F47 also removed his arm rest and struck Resident #F125 in the face. She confirmed the incident between Resident #F47 and #F125 was physical abuse.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment was maintained in a safe ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment was maintained in a safe and orderly manner by failing to ensure geri-chairs were in good repair for 1 (#4) of 2 (#4 and #94) residents reviewed for environment. Findings: Review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Non-Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage. Review of Resident #4's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem Onset: 09/25/2023 Problem: I need assist with transfers because of my decreased mobility (geri-chair), hemiparesis, poor posture (scoliosis), impaired vision (cataracts), and poor cognition Traumatic Brain Injury. Approaches: Assist me in my geri-chair. Review of facility's Durable Medical Equipment Monthly Maintenance Logs, dated 11/01/2023 -11/14/2023, revealed no entries for Resident #4's geri-chair. On 11/13/2023 at 9:23 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #4's room. A geri-chair was noted in Resident #4's bathroom and revealed the following: approximately a 3 inch tear on top of the head rest, a dime sized tear to the left and right arm rest, the footrest was observed out and shifted to the left with approximately a one foot long tear, and torn portions of the leather on the footrest of the chair with metal exposed. On 11/14/2023 at 12:12 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S21CNA. She observed Resident #4's geri-chair and confirmed the aforementioned observations. She stated Resident#4 was transferred into the geri-chair three times a week. S21CNA confirmed she had not reported the condition of Resident #4's geri-chair to anyone and should have. On 11/14/2023 at 1:02 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S22RN. She observed Resident #4's geri-chair and confirmed the aforementioned observations. S22RN confirmed Resident #4 was transferred into the geri-chair when out of bed. She stated she was not aware Resident #4's geri-chair was broken. She confirmed Resident #4's geri-chair was broken and should not be in use. On 11/14/2023 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S23OT. He stated he was responsible for the geri-chairs by replacing them when broken. He observed Resident #4's geri-chair and confirmed the aforementioned observations. S23OT confirmed Resident #4's geri-chair was broken, needed to be replaced, and should not be in use. He confirmed no one had reported it to him, and should have. On 11/15/2023 at 3:47 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She confirmed staff should never transfer a resident into a broken geri-chair. She was notified of the aforementioned observation of Resident #4's geri-chair. S3DON confirmed a geri-chair in that condition was unsafe, should not be used by a resident, and should have been repaired or replaced. S3DON confirmed Resident #4 should not have been transferred into a broken geri-chair.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report an allegations of physical abuse to the state survey agenc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report an allegations of physical abuse to the state survey agency within 2 hours for 2 (#75 and #89 ) of 4 (#75, #89, #132, and #338) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy revealed the following, in part: 9. Ensure that all reporting requirements are followed. Resident # 75 Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #75's Incident Investigation dated 10/30/2023 revealed the following, in part: At 6:50 a.m., Resident #75 was punched in his left cheek and kicked by Resident #338. Resident #75's mouth was bleeding. It appears he bit his cheek. Signed by S9RN. Review of the Incident Report submitted to the state survey agency for Resident #75 revealed the following, in part: Victim: Resident #75 Accused: Resident #338 Incident Occurred: 10/30/2023 at 6:50 a.m. Incident Discovered: 10/30/2023 at 6:50 a.m. Incident Reported/Entered: 10/30/2023 at 3:09 p.m. Accused Allegation: Physical Abuse Resident #89 Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #89 was admitted to facility on 10/31/2019. Review of Resident #89's Nurse's Note dated 10/15/2023 at 8:55 p.m. revealed the following, in part: At 6:00 p.m., Resident #89 and Resident #132 were noted fighting on the unit. Resident #89 and Resident #132 were trading punches in the snack room doorway. Review of the Incident Report submitted to the state survey agency for Resident #89 revealed the following, in part: Victim: Resident #89 Accused: Resident #132 Incident Occurred: 10/15/2023 at 6:03 p.m. Incident Discovered: 10/15/2023 at 6:03 p.m. Incident Reported/Entered: 10/15/2023 at 10:05 p.m. Accused Allegation: Physical Abuse On 11/15/2023 at 9:44 a.m., an interview was conducted with S27CRRN. S27CRRN reported he was responsible for submitting allegations of abuse to the state survey agency. He reviewed the above listed incident reports for Resident #75 and Resident #89 and confirmed they were allegations of physical abuse and were not reported to the state survey agency within two hours. On 11/15/2023 at 3:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM stated allegations of physical abuse should be reported to the state survey agency within two hours of being discovered. He confirmed the above listed incident reports for Resident #75 and Resident #89 were allegations of physical abuse and were not reported to the state survey agency within the two hours as required.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered plan of care by failing to ensure week...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered plan of care by failing to ensure weekly restorative nursing assessments were completed for 1 (#99) of 2 (#9 and #99) residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings: Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #99 had diagnoses which included: Neuromyelitis Optica (Devic's Disease), Monoplegia of Upper Limb, Right Wrist Drop, and Incomplete Paraplegia. Review of the MDS with ARD of 11/02/2023 revealed Resident #99 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of the current Care Plan for Resident #99 revealed the following, in part: Problem: need for Restorative Nursing to prevent contractures and maintain current mobility. Approaches: Provide Passive Range of Motion to my bilateral lower extremities every shift; evaluate my Restorative Care every week on Wednesdays. Review of Physician Order dated 08/08/2023 revealed: Evaluate restorative nursing every week on Wednesdays. Review of Restorative Nursing Evaluation revealed: Restorative Nursing Evaluations were completed on the following dates: 08/16/2023, and 09/13/2023. On 11/15/2023 at 12:18 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #99. He stated staff did not performed passive range of motion to his lower extremities each shift. On 11/15/2023 at 2:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with S16LPN. S16LPN confirmed she was not aware that Resident #99 had orders to receive restorative care every shift. S16LPN stated the process was for the LPN to document the task on the MAR once they verify the CNA completed the restorative care every week, and the Restorative Evaluation Assessment was completed. S16LPN confirmed that she signed off the MAR the task was completed, but did not complete the weekly restorative assessment, and did not ensure the restorative care was completed every shift per CNAs. She stated she should have ensured the CNA completed the task, and should have documented the weekly Restorative Evaluation Assessment before documenting it on the MAR. On 11/15/2023 at 2:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S18CNA. She reported she has never performed any passive range of motion on Resident #99. She stated she did not know that he needed passive range of motion. On 11/15/2023 at 02:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with S11RN. She confirmed Resident #99 was supposed to be on Restorative Care Program. She confirmed that CNAs should document the daily restorative care, and LPNs should document weekly restorative evaluation assessments. She further confirmed there were no Weekly Restorative assessments charted. On 11/15/2023 at 3:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She confirmed Resident #99 was to receive daily passive range of motion and the CNAs should document it. She confirmed LPNs should be completing and documenting weekly restorative nursing evaluation assessments. She confirmed no Restorative Nursing Evaluation Assessments were completed and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provis...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Oxygen tubing was labeled and the oxygen humidifier bottle was properly changed for 1 (#4) of 3 (#4, #81, and #84) residents; and 2. Oxygen orders were initiated for 1 (#81) of 3 (#4, #81, and #84) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings: 1. Review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypoxemia, and Coronavirus Disease. Review of Resident #4's Physician Orders dated November 2023 revealed the following, in part: Oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturations less than 88%. Review of Resident #4's current Care Plan for Resident #4 revealed the following, in part: Problem Onset: 09/25/2023 Problem: I am at risk for not breathing well, impaired gas exchange, due to my history of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Approaches: I need oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula Review of Resident #4's Respiratory Administration Record dated November 2023 revealed no documentation of oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle being changed. On 11/13/2023 at 9:23 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #4 lying in bed with oxygen in use via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute. There was no date noted on the oxygen tubing. The humidifier bottle was dated 11/02/2023. On 11/14/2023 at 10:52 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #4 lying in bed with oxygen in use via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute. There was no date noted on the oxygen tubing. The humidifier bottle was dated 11/02/2023. On 11/14/2023 at 12:05 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S24RT. She stated oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles should be changed weekly. She observed Resident #4's nasal cannula and confirmed it was not dated and should have been. She observed Resident #4's humidifier bottle and confirmed it was dated 11/02/2023 and should have been changed prior to 11/14/2023. On 11/14/2023 at 1:02 p.m., an interview was conducted with S22RN. She stated Resident #4 had oxygen ordered at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. She stated oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles were changed weekly on Sundays. She confirmed Resident #4's oxygen tubing was not dated and should have been. She confirmed Resident #4's humidifier bottle was dated 11/02/2023 and should have been changed prior to 11/14/2023. On 11/15/2023 at 3:47 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She stated oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles were to be changed every seven days. She was notified of observations made of Resident #4's undated oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle dated 11/02/2023. She confirmed Resident #4's oxygen tubing should have been dated. She confirmed Resident #4's humidifier bottle dated 11/02/2023 should have been changed prior to 11/14/2023. 2. Review of Resident #81's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Coronavirus Disease. Review of Resident #81's Physician Orders dated November 2023 revealed no order for oxygen therapy prior to 11/14/2023. Review of Resident #81's Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record dated November 2023 revealed no documentation of oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #81's Nurse's Note dated 11/12/2023 by S30LPN revealed the following, in part: Resident #81 returned to the facility and was noted wearing 2 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #81's Discharge Summary from a local hospital dated 11/12/2023 revealed the following, in part: Resident #81 will be discharged on oxygen via nasal cannula. On 11/13/23 at 10:46 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #81 lying in bed with oxygen in use via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute. On 11/14/2023 at 11:10 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #81 lying in bed with oxygen in use via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute. On 11/14/2023 at 11:48 a.m., an interview was conducted with S24RT. She stated Resident #81 returned to the facility on [DATE] on oxygen via nasal cannula. She stated Resident #81 should have an order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. She reviewed Resident #81's physician orders and confirmed there was no order for oxygen and should have been. On 11/14/2023 at 1:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S22RN. She stated Resident #81 returned from the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Coronavirus disease and had been wearing oxygen via nasal cannula. She stated the nurses who readmitted Resident #81 were responsible for inputting any new orders. She reviewed Resident #81's electronic physician orders and confirmed there was no order for oxygen in the computer for Resident #81. She confirmed she could not locate an order for oxygen on the hard chart for Resident #81. She confirmed Resident #81 had been wearing oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula, and should have had an order for it and did not. On 11/15/2023 at 12:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with S22RN. She confirmed standing orders should be inputted into the computer. She confirmed when Resident #81 returned to the facility on oxygen, an order should have been inputted in to the computer, and the doctor should have been notified. On 11/15/2023 at 1:23 p.m., an interview was conducted with S10RNM. She stated when a resident required oxygen, staff should input the standing order for oxygen into the computer. After reviewing Resident #81's hard chart, she confirmed there was no order for oxygen until 11/14/2023. She confirmed when Resident #81 returned from the hospital an order for oxygen should have been inputted into the computer and was not. On 11/15/2023 at 3:47 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She confirmed a resident should not be on oxygen without a physician's order. After reviewing Resident #81's physician's orders, she confirmed there was no order for oxygen after the resident returned from the hospital on [DATE] and there should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0825 (Tag F0825)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered plan of care by failing to ensure week...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered plan of care by failing to ensure weekly restorative nursing assessments were completed for 1 (#99) of 2 (#9 and #99) residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings: Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #99 had diagnoses which included: Neuromyelitis Optica (Devic's Disease), Monoplegia of Upper Limb, Right Wrist Drop, and Incomplete Paraplegia. Review of the MDS with ARD of 11/02/2023 revealed Resident #99 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of the current Care Plan for Resident #99 revealed the following, in part: Problem: need for Restorative Nursing to prevent contractures and maintain current mobility. Approaches: Provide Passive Range of Motion to my bilateral lower extremities every shift; evaluate my Restorative Care every week on Wednesdays. Review of Physician Order dated 08/08/2023 revealed: Evaluate restorative nursing every week on Wednesdays. Review of Restorative Nursing Evaluation revealed: Restorative Nursing Evaluations were completed on the following dates: 08/16/2023, and 09/13/2023. On 11/15/2023 at 12:18 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #99. He stated staff did not performed passive range of motion to his lower extremities each shift. On 11/15/2023 at 2:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with S16LPN. S16LPN confirmed she was not aware that Resident #99 had orders to receive restorative care every shift. S16LPN stated the process was for the LPN to document the task on the MAR once they verify the CNA completed the restorative care every week, and the Restorative Evaluation Assessment was completed. S16LPN confirmed that she signed off the MAR the task was completed, but did not complete the weekly restorative assessment, and did not ensure the restorative care was completed every shift per CNAs. She stated she should have ensured the CNA completed the task, and should have documented the weekly Restorative Evaluation Assessment before documenting it on the MAR. On 11/15/2023 at 2:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S18CNA. She reported she has never performed any passive range of motion on Resident #99. She stated she did not know that he needed passive range of motion. On 11/15/2023 at 02:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with S11RN. She confirmed Resident #99 was supposed to be on Restorative Care Program. She confirmed that CNAs should document the daily restorative care, and LPNs should document weekly restorative evaluation assessments. She further confirmed there were no Weekly Restorative assessments charted. On 11/15/2023 at 3:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She confirmed Resident #99 was to receive daily passive range of motion and the CNAs should document it. She confirmed LPNs should be completing and documenting weekly restorative nursing evaluation assessments. She confirmed no Restorative Nursing Evaluation Assessments were completed and should have been.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0576 (Tag F0576)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on Saturdays for 3 (#62, #120, and #132) of 7 (#47, #62, #99, #112, #117, #120, and #132) residents reviewe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on Saturdays for 3 (#62, #120, and #132) of 7 (#47, #62, #99, #112, #117, #120, and #132) residents reviewed for mail during the resident council meeting. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 144 residents residing in the facility. Review of the facility's Policy titled, Mail revealed the following, in part: Purpose: To ensure residents receive their mail in a timely manner. Procedure: 1. Weekend and holiday mail will be picked up by the Nursing Department .Any packages received on weekends and holidays shall be distributed by the nursing department. During the resident council meeting on 11/13/2023 at 1:38 p.m., Resident #62, Resident #120, and Resident #132 all stated mail was not delivered on Saturdays and was held until the following Monday. An interview was conducted with S5SSC on 11/14/2023 at 11:00 a.m. He stated he, S6SSC and S7SSC were responsible for delivering the residents' mail. He stated there was no one present to deliver mail on Saturdays. He stated mail and packages from the weekend were held and delivered to the residents on Monday. An interview was conducted with S7SSC on 11/14/2023 at 11:12 a.m. She stated she was responsible for delivering mail to residents. She stated she did not work Saturdays, and she was unsure if mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays. An interview was conducted with S6SSC on 11/14/2023 at 11:18 a.m. She stated she delivered mail to her assigned residents Monday through Friday. She stated weekend mail and packages were delivered to the residents on Monday. She confirmed residents did not receive mail and packages on Saturdays. An interview was conducted with S4SSD on 11/14/2023 at 11:22 a.m. She stated the Social Services Counselors and herself delivered mail to the residents Monday through Friday. She stated the RN Managers were responsible for delivering packages to the residents on Saturdays. An interview was conducted with S10RNM on 11/14/2023 at 11:35 a.m. She confirmed she was the RN Manager every other weekend. She stated she was not responsible for checking mail or delivering mail or packages to residents. She stated Social Services was responsible for delivering mail to residents. An interview was conducted with S3DON on 11/14/2023 at 11:30 a.m. She stated she was not aware RN Managers had any responsibility for residents' weekend mail. She stated Social Services was responsible for delivering mail to residents. An interview was conducted with S2AADM on 11/14/2023 at 12:08 p.m. He stated Social Services delivered residents' mail Monday through Friday. He stated the RN Managers should have delivered residents' mail on Saturdays. He confirmed residents should receive their mail and packages on Saturdays.
Apr 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided by the facility to meet quality pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided by the facility to meet quality professional standards. The facility failed to ensure: 1. hospital discharge orders were documented and followed for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) sampled residents and 2. medications were accurately documented for 1 (#4) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration revealed the following, in part: A. Proper medication administration procedure must be followed B. Medications must be administered only by authorized personnel . M. The nurse must document medication administration on the resident's e-MAR after administering medications . Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Unspecified Intracranial Injury, Unspecified Convulsions, and Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode. Review of Resident #1's Hospital Discharge Plan dated 04/02/2023 to 04/04/2023 revealed the following, in part: Meds/Rx: New: Nicotine 21 mg/24 Hour Patch: 21mg transdermal daily for 30 days Thiamine Mononitrate (Vitamin B1) 100mg Tablet: 200mg PO daily Pantoprazole 40 mg Tablet, Delayed Release: 40mg PO daily Changed: Propranolol 10 mg Tablet: 10mg PO BID Clonazepam 1 mg Tablet: 0.5mg PO TID PRN Discontinued: Mirtazapine (Remeron) 15mg Tablet: 15mg PO Daily Zonisamide (Zonegran) 100 mg Capsule: 100mg PO Daily Zinc Gluconate 50 mg Tablet: 50mg PO Daily Review of Resident #1's Doctor's Order Sheet dated April 2023 revealed no documentation of aforementioned medication changes. Review of Resident #1's April 2023 Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date: 05/18/2022 Propranolol 10 mg Tablet. Give 1 tablet three times a day for agitation, Start date: 12/06/2022 Clonazepam 1 mg Tablet. Give one tab by mouth three times a day, Start date: 09/12/2017 Remeron 15 mg Tablet. Give one tablet (15 mg) by mouth at bedtime, Start date: 12/26/2019 Zonegran 100 mg Capsule. Take 1 cap (100 mg) by mouth daily, and Start date: 10/14/2021 Zinc 50 mg Tablet: One tablet (50 mg) by mouth daily (Wound Healing) continue 3 months after wound heals then discontinue. Further review revealed the new medications prescribed from the hospital were not reflected. Review of Resident #1's MAR for April 2023 revealed the resident was administered the following medications from 04/05/2023 to 04/18/2023: Propranolol 10 mg Tablet. Give 1 tablet three times a day for agitation. Clonazepam 1 mg Tablet. Give one tab by mouth three times a day Remeron 15 mg Tablet. Give one tablet (15 mg) by mouth at bedtime (depression). Zonegran 100 mg Capsule. Take 1 cap (100 mg) by mouth daily (Seizure DO) Zinc 50 mg Tablet: One tablet (50 mg) by mouth daily (Wound Healing) continue 3 months after wound heals then discontinue. Further review revealed Resident #1 did not receive Nicotine, Thiamine Mononitrate (Vitamin B1), and Pantoprazole. Review of Resident #1's Nurses' Notes revealed the following, in part: 04/04/2023 at 3:20 p.m. Resident returned to ward from a local hospital via ambulance transport. Signed S3LPN. On 04/20/2023 at 12:25 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2RN. S2RN stated when a resident returned from the hospital, the nurse receiving the resident reviewed the medication orders and entered them in the MAR. S2RN reviewed Resident #1's Hospital Discharge Plan and MAR. S2RN confirmed the changes to Resident #1's Clonazepam and Propranolol were not reflected on the MAR and were not administered per the hospital orders. She confirmed per the MAR the resident was receiving medications discontinued by the hospital. S2RN stated if the changes to a resident's medications were not documented on the Doctor's Order Sheet or MAR, no one would know if orders were stopped or if a medication was changed. On 04/20/2023 at 2:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with the facility's Nurse Practitioner. He reviewed the hospital discharge plan medications for Resident #1. He stated if the hospital discharged or changed a resident's medication regimen, he would implement the orders from the hospital. He stated he was aware of Resident #1's medication changes from the hospital. He stated he spoke with the nurse and stated they were going to follow what the hospital said. He stated the nurse was aware of Resident #1's medication changes and to implement them. He stated he was not aware Resident #1's medication changes had not been implemented. On 04/20/2023 at 2:42 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3LPN. S3LPN confirmed she received Resident #1 from the hospital. S3LPN stated when a resident returned from the hospital, the new orders were entered into the computer and in the chart on the Doctor's Order Sheet. S3LPN stated she could not recall if she entered the orders for Resident #1 when he returned from the hospital. On 04/20/2023 at 3:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. S1DON stated when a resident returned to the facility, the readmitting nurse transcribed the discharge orders from the hospital into the MAR and on the Doctor's Order Sheet. S1DON stated the updated Physician Orders would reflect on the MAR. S1DON stated the checks on the MARs indicated the medication was given to the resident. S1DON reviewed Resident #1's Hospital Discharge Plan, Doctor's Order Sheet, current Physician's Orders, and MAR. S1DON confirmed the orders from the hospital were not transcribed or followed. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses, which included Diabetes Mellitus, Pituitary Tumor, Memory loss, Obesity, Panhypopituitarism (Diabetes Insipidus/Anterior Pituitary Deficiency), and Vision loss. Review of Resident #4 Physician's Orders dated March 2023 revealed the following orders: Start date: 03/17/2023 Cortef 5mg- give 3 tabs (15mg) BID for 10 days Review of Resident #4's MAR dated March 2023 revealed the following, in part: Start date: 03/17/2023 - Cortef 5mg - give 3 tabs (15mg) BID for 10 days Further review revealed an N with S4LPN's initials on 03/17/2023 at 7:00 p.m., 03/18/2023 at 7:00 a.m., and 03/26/2023 at 7:00 p.m., which indicated the medication was not administered. Review of Resident #4's Administration Record e-MAR notes dated March 2023 revealed, in part, Cortef 5 mg give 3 tabs (15mg) BID for 10 days was noted to have been documented as a late entry as follows: Scheduled for 03/17/2023 at 7:00 p.m., documented by S4LPN on 03/21/2023 at 1:09 p.m. not administered - resident not available Scheduled for 03/18/2023 at 7:00 a.m., documented by S4LPN on 03/21/2023 at 1:09 p.m. not administered - resident not available Scheduled for 03/19/2023 at 7:00 a.m., documented by S4LPN on 03/21/2023 at 1:09 p.m. not administered - resident not available On 4/20/23 at 2:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. She stated Resident #4's MAR had a lot of red, which meant someone did not document the medications administered or not administered. She stated she did not work on 03/17/2023, 03/18/2023 and 03/19/2023. She stated when she worked on 3/21/2023. Resident #4's medication administration screen was full of reds. She stated she checked them all off as not administered so it would clear the reds. She confirmed she did not know if Resident #4 received her Cortef on 03/17/2023, 03/18/2023, and/or 03/19/2023. On 4/20/23 at 3:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. She stated if there was an N on the MAR that meant the medication was not administered. She confirmed there were three doses of Cortef on Resident #4's MAR that were signed as not given. She confirmed S4LPN documented medications as not being administered on shifts she did not work and she should not have.
Dec 2022 8 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment was maintained in a safe ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment was maintained in a safe and orderly manner by failing to ensure geri-chairs were in good repair for 2 (#5 and #70) of 3 (#5, #48, and #70) residents reviewed for geri-chairs condition. Findings: Resident #5 Review of the Clinical Record for Resident #5 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Unspecified Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction and Epilepsy. An observation was conducted of Resident #5 eating lunch in the dining area on 11/29/2022 at 12:58 p.m. His geri-chair had one side panel missing on the right side of his chair. There was a white bar hanging under the leg recliner part of the chair. An observation was conducted of Resident #5 on 11/30/2022 at 9:10 a.m. He was lying in a geri-chair with a blanket behind his head. He had a missing panel on the right side of his geri-chair. There was a rod hanging down under the footrest of the chair. Resident #70 Review of the Clinical Record for Resident #70 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-dominant Side. An observation was conducted of Resident #70 on 11/30/2022 at 9:14 a.m. He was lying in his geri-chair in the Day Room. He had panels missing on the left and right sides of his geri-chair. There was approximately 3 inches of foam exposed on the top right and left portions of his geri-chair. There were torn portions of the leather on the foot rest of the chair. There was exposed foam on the footrest of the chair. An interview was conducted with S14CNA on 11/30/2022 at 9:19 a.m. She confirmed Resident #5 and Resident #70's chairs needed to be replaced. She confirmed Resident #5's geri-chair was missing the panel on the right side of his chair and there was a rod hanging under the elevated leg portion of the chair. She confirmed Resident #70 was missing the right and left side panels on his geri-chair. She stated she had not reported the condition of the geri-chairs to anyone. An interview was conducted with S5RN on 11/30/2022 at 9:22 a.m. She confirmed she was assigned to Resident #5 and Resident #70. An observation was conducted of Resident #5 and Resident #70's geri-chairs at that time. She confirmed Resident #5 was missing the right side panel on his geri-chair and there was a rod hanging under the chair. She confirmed the left and right side panels were missing on Resident #70's geri-chair. She stated Resident #5 and Resident #70's geri-chairs needed to be replaced. An interview was conducted with S36M on 11/30/2022 at 9:35 a.m. He measured the spaces between the armrests of the geri-chair and the padding where the residents' buttocks rests. He confirmed the open space where the panel was missing was the 12.5 inches high and 25.5 inches long. An interview was conducted with S35OT on 11/30/2022 at 9:38 a.m. He observed Resident #5 and Resident #70's geri-chairs at that time. He confirmed Resident #70 was missing the right and left side panels of his geri-chair and Resident #5 was missing the right side panel on his geri-chair. He stated he was responsible for the geri-chairs and replacing them if needed. He stated he did not inspect the geri-chairs unless he was notified of a problem. He stated he was not aware Resident #5 and Resident #70's geri-chairs were in disrepair. He confirmed Resident #5 and Resident #70's geri-chairs needed to be replaced.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered plan of care by failing...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered plan of care by failing to administer a Physician prescribed nutritional supplement for 1 (#48) of 5 (#48, #58, #75, #94, and #128) residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: Review of the Clinical Record for Resident #48 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Personal History of Traumatic Brain Injury, Dysphagia, and Vascular Dementia. Review of Resident #48's Physician Orders dated November 2022 revealed the following, in part: 4000 kcal pureed diet, Mighty Shake with every meal. Review of the current Care Plan for Resident #48 revealed the following, in part: Problem: I need adequate nutrition due to my multiple medical issues: I have a history of weight loss and I need assistance of staff for eating and drinking. Interventions: I need a diet of 4000 calories pureed with a Mighty Shake with each meal. Review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/24/2022 for Resident #48 revealed, in part, a BIMS interview could not be conducted related to Resident #48 was rarely/never understood and he required total dependence of one staff member for eating. An interview was conducted with S14CNA on 11/30/22 at 9:09 a.m. She confirmed she was assigned to Resident #48. She stated Resident #48 had to be fed all meals by staff. She stated Resident #48 did not receive any supplements with meals. An observation was conducted of Resident #48 being served his lunch tray on 11/30/2022 at 12:39 p.m. He did not have a Mighty Shake with his lunch meal. An observation was conducted of Resident #48 being served and fed his lunch on 12/01/2022 at 1:13 p.m. by S15CNA. He did not have a Mighty Shake with his lunch. An interview was conducted with S15CNA on 12/01/2022 at 1:25 p.m. She stated Resident #48 had finished his lunch meal. She confirmed Resident #48 did not have a Mighty Shake with his lunch meal and should have. She further stated Resident #48 did not receive a Mighty Shake at breakfast and should have. She confirmed she did not retrieve the Mighty Shake from the kitchen. She stated if the kitchen did not send the Mighty Shake, the resident did not receive it at that meal. She stated it was frequent the kitchen did not place a Mighty Shake on Resident #48's tray. She stated Resident #48 consumed his Mighty Shake when it was provided. An interview was conducted with S11RN on 12/01/2022 at 1:28 p.m. She stated the kitchen frequently did not put Mighty Shakes on the residents' tray. She confirmed if a resident had an order for a supplement with meals, it should have been provided on their meal tray by the kitchen. An interview was conducted with S4DON on 12/01/2022 at 3:45 p.m. She stated if a supplement was ordered with meals, the kitchen should have provided the supplement. She stated if the kitchen did not provide the meal-time supplement, the staff serving the tray should have notified the kitchen and retrieved the supplement.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing to identify a significant weight loss and implement interventions for 1 (#9) of 2 (#9 and #48) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Weights-Obtaining Accurate Weights revealed, in part: Policy: K. At the time of obtaining weights, the unit nurse will review the previous weights on the resident for changes. The resident will be reweighed immediately if there is greater than a 5 pound weight loss/gain from the previous month. L. If there is still a greater than 5 pound weight loss/gain from the previous month when the resident is reweighed, the unit nurse will notify the physician, DON, ADON, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse , and the Dietician of the weight loss/gain by email. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Major depressive Disorder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hemiplegia, Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia, and Personal History of Traumatic Brain Injury. Review of the MDS with an ARD of 08/30/2022 revealed Resident #9 had a BIMS of 2, which indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. Further review indicated he required one person physical assist for eating. Review of the current Physician's orders for Resident #9 revealed the following: 05/17/2022 Weekly weights Further review indicated no interventions initiated regarding Resident #9's weight loss from 10/10/2022 - 11/07/2022. Review of Resident #9's weight log revealed he had an 8.03% weight loss in a 1-month time period. Weights were documented as: 10/10/2022 - 184.2 lbs. 11/07/2022 - 169.4 lbs. An interview was attempted on 11/29/2022 at 12:30 p.m. with Resident #9. Resident #9 was unable to communicate. An interview was conducted on 11/29/2022 at 12:50 p.m. with S6RN. She said she provided care to Resident #9 on 11/07/2022. She said on 11/07/2022, she obtained Resident #9's weight and recorded his weight of 169.4 pounds in the log book located at the nurse's station. She said she informed S7RN of Resident #9's current weight. An interview was conducted on 11/29/2022 at 1:00 p.m. with S7RN. She said she was unsure of who was responsible for notifying the Dietitian and the doctor when a resident had a weight loss. She said she did not report Resident #9's weight loss to the Dietitian or the doctor. An interview was conducted on 11/29/2022 at 1:15 p.m. with S5RN. She reviewed Resident #9's weight log and verified he had a weight loss of 14.8 lbs. within a one month timeframe. She said the dietitian, who was no longer employed with the facility, was responsible for monitoring monthly weight loss and notifying the doctor. She reviewed the recommendations from the dietitian and confirmed there were no recommendations for treatment for Resident #9 for the month of November 2022. An interview was conducted on 11/29/2022 at 2:00 p.m. with S3MD. He said he was unaware of Resident #9's weight loss of 14.8 lbs. from 10/10/2022 through 11/07/2022. He said he did not receive recommendations from the dietitian regarding Resident #9's weight loss. He said if he had been made aware of the 14.8 lb. weight loss within a 1-month time period, he would have added interventions to assist Resident #9 in gaining weight. An interview was conducted on 11/29/2022 at 2:30 p.m. with S4DON. She reviewed Resident #9's weight log and verified he had a 14.8 lb. weight loss from 10/10/2022 through 11/07/2022. She said the facility did not have a Registered Dietitian at the present time. She said she was responsible for ensuring monthly weights were being monitored until a Registered Dietitian was hired. She verified weight loss was a condition in which the doctor should have been consulted. She said she did not have any documentation indicating the doctor had been consulted for Resident #9.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0809 (Tag F0809)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served snacks. There were 138 residents out of a census of 149 who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served snacks. There were 138 residents out of a census of 149 who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the policy titled Therapeutic Diets revealed the following: Policy Statement Therapeutic Diets are prescribed by the Attending Physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 9. Snacks will be compatible with the therapeutic diet. Resident #62 Review of Resident #62's Face Sheet revealed an admit date of 07/22/2015. Review of Resident #62's Clinical Record revealed diagnoses, which included Paraplegia, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage III, Pressure Ulcer of Right Hip, Stage IV, Pressure Ulcer of Unspecified Buttock, Stage IV, and Pressure Ulcer of Left Hip, Stage IV. Review of Resident #62's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/25/2022 revealed a BIMS of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. On 12/01/2022 at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #62. Resident #62 stated the residents very seldom get snacks. Resident #62 stated when they do get snacks, sometimes there is not enough for everyone. Resident #62 stated they may get snack 3 times a week. Resident #62 stated it's not the staff, they do not have snacks available. Resident #75 Review of Resident #75 Face Sheet revealed an admit date of 11/07/2016. Review of Resident #75's Clinical Record revealed diagnoses, which included Paralytic Syndrome following Bilateral Cerebral Infarct, Insomnia, and Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode. Review of Resident #75's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/12/2022 revealed a BIMS of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #75's Dietary Order dated 11/07/2016 revealed the resident was to receive AM and HS snacks with thin liquids. On 11/30/2022 at 9:28 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9LPN. S9LPN stated it has been months since they have received snacks. S9LPN stated the residents complain of being hungry all of the time. S9LPN stated she will try to go and get food for them and the kitchen will say they do not have food or they do not have access to the food. S9LPN stated this has been reported to her supervisor and ADON. On 12/01/2022 at 10:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8LPN. S8LPN states the kitchen runs out of snacks from time to time. On 12/01/2022 at 1:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #75. Resident #75 stated he gets snacks every now and then. Resident #75 stated the snacks are mostly at night. Resident #75 stated he was hungry and never gets enough food to fill him up. On 12/01/2022 at 2:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S34ADON. S34ADON stated he has received complaints of residents not receiving their snacks. S34ADON stated when the complaints were received, staff were given the keys to the kitchen. On 12/01/2022 at 2:49 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S7RN. S7RN stated the residents have ran out of snacks several times. S7RN stated the kitchen has run out of snacks several times and estimated it to be reported 4-6 times a month. S7RN stated residents have requested snacks during her shift and the kitchen did not have snacks to provide to the residents. S7RN stated the kitchen workers would state the truck has not come or that they do not have them. S7LPN stated this has been reported to the dietician, the ADON, and the DON. S7RN stated one of the administrative staff had to go and purchase pudding. S7RN stated the residents are always hungry. On 12/01/2022 at 3:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4DON. S4DON stated the contracted dietary company provides snacks for the residents. S4DON stated the contracted dietary company for the facility is not providing the snacks that fit the resident's needs. S4DON stated this is why the residents are not getting their snacks.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had Preadmission screenings (Level 1 and/or Level 2) completed for 16 (#65, #93, #118, #147, #143, #146, #351, #136, #97, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had Preadmission screenings (Level 1 and/or Level 2) completed for 16 (#65, #93, #118, #147, #143, #146, #351, #136, #97, #74, #8, #83, #11, #112, #85, #37) of 19 (#36, #77, #33) residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility's current census was 149 according to the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form. Findings: 1. Review of resident #65's face sheet revealed an admit date of 07/31/2015 with diagnoses including Impulse Disorder and Unspecified Intracranial Injury. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 2. Review of resident #93's face sheet revealed an admit date of 06/15/2018 with diagnoses including Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 3. Review of Resident #118's face sheet revealed an admit date of 10/25/2013 with diagnosis including Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 4. Review of Resident #147's face sheet revealed an admit date of 10/20/2022 with diagnosis including Paranoid Schizophrenia Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 5. Review of Resident #143's face sheet revealed an admit date of 08/03/2022 with diagnosis including Schizophrenia Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 6. Review of Resident #146's face sheet revealed an admit date of 10/10/2022 with diagnosis including Schizophrenia Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 7. Review of Resident #351's face sheet revealed an admit date of 09/24/2021 with diagnosis including Long Term Drug Therapy and Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 8. Review of Resident #136's face sheet revealed an admit date of 07/13/2022 with diagnosis including Schizophrenia Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 9. Review of Resident #97's face sheet revealed an admit date of 12/24/2008 with diagnosis including Schizophrenia Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 10. Review of Resident #74's face sheet revealed an admit date of 09/14/2014 with diagnosis including Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy and Unspecified Mental Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 11. Review of Resident #8's face sheet revealed an admit date of 12/06/2018 with diagnosis including Moderate Intellectual Disabilities and Schizophrenia Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 12. Review of Resident #83's face sheet revealed an admit date of 09/25/2017 with diagnosis including Paranoid Schizophrenia Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 13. Review of Resident #11's face sheet revealed an admit date of 12/03/2022 with diagnosis including Vascular Dementia and Diabetes. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 14. Review of Resident #112's face sheet revealed an admit date of 11/23/2020 with diagnosis including Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 15. Review of Resident #85's face sheet revealed an admit date of 12/20/2017 with diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia Disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. 16. Review of Resident #37's face sheet revealed an admit date of 09/10/2014 with diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Disease. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation that a Level 1 or Level 2 PASARR screening had been completed. On 11/28/22 at 1:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S10MRS. She said when a resident comes from the hospital to their sick bay beds, they were not required to do a PASARR or 142, which is a screening for admission. On 11/29/22 at 12:20 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with personnel at the state agency that reviews PASARRs. She said that any resident admitted to a nursing facility must go through the PASARR screening and have a LOCET completed to be admitted to the facility. On 11/29/22 at 1:29 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He said PASARRs had always been a gray area at this facility and he produced the agreement with their facility and the mental health system. He verified PASARRs were not done for the residents coming from the mental health system.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet the nutritional needs of residents by failing to ensure: 1. A pureed wheat roll and con...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet the nutritional needs of residents by failing to ensure: 1. A pureed wheat roll and confetti cake were provided for 3 of 3 (#22, #48, and #118) residents reviewed for dining on pureed diets. There were 11 residents in the facility who received a pureed diet. 2. The correct portion sizes ordered were provided for 5 of 5 (#22, #48, #100, #118, and #128) residents reviewed for dining. Resident #22- Review of the lunch meal ticket dated 12/01/2022 for Resident #22 revealed the following, part: Double Portions 2 - ½ cup Pureed Oven Fried Chicken 2 - ½ cup Pureed [NAME] Beans 2 - 1/3 cup Pureed Confetti Cake 2 - 1.5 ounce Pureed Wheat Roll Resident #48 Review of the lunch meal ticket dated 12/01/2022 for Resident #48 revealed the following, in part: Double Portions 2 - each Oven Fried Chicken 2 - ½ cup [NAME] Beans 2 - 2x2 Slice Confetti Cake 2 - each Wheat Roll Resident #100 Review of the lunch meal ticket dated 11/29/2022 for Resident #100 revealed the following, in part: Double Portions 2-3/4 cup beef tamale pie 2-1/2 cup yellow rice 2-1/2 cup green beans Resident #118 Review of the lunch meal ticket dated 12/01/2022 for Resident #118 revealed the following, in part: Double Portions 2 - ½ cup Pureed Oven Fried Chicken 2 - ½ cup Pureed [NAME] Beans 2 - ¼ cup Pureed Confetti Cake 2 - 1.5 ounce Pureed Wheat Roll Resident #128 Review of the lunch meal ticket dated 11/29/2022 for Resident #128 revealed the following, in part: Renal, double 2 - pork chop with gravy 2 - 1/2 cup yellow rice 2 - 1/2 cup green beans An observation was conducted of Resident #100's lunch tray on 11/29/2022 at 1:00 p.m.,. Resident #100 had one meal tray with beef tamale pie mixed with yellow rice, a roll, green beans, and a sugar cookie. An observation and interview was conducted with S16CNA on 11/29/2022 at 1:07 p.m. She said Resident #100 and #128 were ordered to receive double portions. She confirmed Resident #100 and Resident #128 did not receive double portions, which consisted of 2 trays, for lunch today. An observation of Resident #100's lunch tray and ticket was conducted with S26DMC and S22DM on 11/29/2022 at 1:20 p.m. S26DMC stated residents ordered for double portions would receive 2 meal trays. S22DM reviewed Resident #100's meal ticket. She said Resident #100 should have received 2 meal trays. She stated each tray should measure ¾ cup of beef tamale pie, ½ of yellow rice, ½ cup of green beans, one sugar cookie and one roll. S22DM measured a ½ of cup of the beef tamale pie mixed with yellow rice. S22DM confirmed it was not enough food on the tray for a single serving. An observation was conducted with S24KS on 11/29/2022 at 01:27 p.m. She reviewed Resident #128's meal ticket and stated he should have received 2 lunch trays. She stated each tray should have been a pork chop with gravy, ½ cup of yellow rice, ½ cup of green beans and a sugar cookie. She confirmed Resident #128 received one tray with beef tamale pie mixed with rice, 2 soft rolls, green beans and a sugar cookie. She confirmed Resident #128 did not receive his correct tray and did not receive double portions. An interview was conducted at this time with S24KS. She said she has worked at the facility for a couple months and is currently training a new employee. She confirmed she and the new employee platted the trays on the serving line today for lunch. She confirmed on the serving line, she used the grey scoop (½ cup) for the tamale pie, and the green scoop (1/3 cup) for the green beans, yellow rice and the puree foods. S32DS provided surveyor with a double portions pureed meal test tray on 11/30/2022 at 1:25 p.m. An interview was conducted with S22DM on 11/30/2022 at 1:30 p.m. She stated if a resident had an ordered 4000 kcal diet, the kitchen staff would provide double portions. S22DM measured the pureed test tray provided to surveyor by S32DS. The mashed potatoes, gravy, and pureed meat were in one section of the container. She measured them all together, and it equaled 1 cup. She stated the mashed potatoes, gravy, and meat should have measured 2 cups. She confirmed it did not equal double portions of mashed potatoes, meat, and gravy. An interview was conducted with S11RN on 12/01/2022 at 9:00 a.m. She confirmed she was assigned to Resident #48. She stated Resident #48 was ordered a 4000 kcal pureed diet. She stated 4000 kcal meant double portions. She stated she frequently fed Resident #48 and he was not actually receiving double portions. She stated he was receiving a single serving of everything, which was approximately 1/2 cup of everything. An interview was conducted with S27CNA on 12/01/2022 at 10:00 a.m. She stated Resident #48 had to be fed by staff and she frequently fed him. She stated Resident #48 never received double portions on his meal tray. She stated he received a single portion and consumed 100%. An observation was conducted of S33KS serving trays in the kitchen of on 12/01/2022 beginning at 12:13 p.m. She was observed serving Resident #22, Resident #48, and Resident #118's meal trays. She confirmed Resident #22, Resident #48, and Resident #118 were ordered Pureed, double portion diets. She placed two of the blue scoops (1/4 cup) for the pureed chicken and pureed green beans on Resident #22, Resident #48, and Resident #118's meal trays. An observation was conducted of S25KS platting lunch trays on 12/01/2022 at 12:33 p.m. She confirmed she used the green scoop (1/3 cup) for the green beans, and the blue scoop (1/4 cup) for the puree food. An interview was conducted at this time with S25KS. She said she did not have any additional grey scoops available to use, so she was using the green and blue scoop and giving a little extra. She said for double portions she would fit what she could in the tray and they could come ask for more. An interview was conducted with S22DM on 12/01/2022 at 12:35 p.m. She confirmed the scoops used were not the correct portion size and the residents were not being served the correct amount of food according to the meal tickets. She confirmed double portions should be 2 meal trays. An interview was conducted with S33KS on 12/01/2022 at 1:10 p.m. She stated for all pureed plates, she used the blue scoop for vegetables and meat. She confirmed the blue scoop measured ¼ cup. She confirmed Resident #22, Resident #48, and Resident #118's meal ticket read to provide (2) 1/2 cups of vegetables and meats, which would equal a total of 1 cup for each item. She stated the residents' plates were not large enough. She stated she disregarded the measurement listed on the meal ticket when serving trays and always used the blue scoop for vegetables and meats. An observation was conducted of Resident #48 being served and eating his lunch on 12/01/2022 at 1:13 p.m. Resident #48's tray included a single portion of pureed chicken and a single portion of pureed green beans. He was not served a dessert or roll per his meal ticket. An interview was conducted with S1ADM on 12/01/2022 at 2:23 p.m. He stated he was aware there were issues in the kitchen. He confirmed the kitchen staff should have been following the residents' meal ticket. An interview was conducted with S29RD on 12/01/2022 at 2:41 p.m. She stated a regular portion diet was based on approximately 1500 kcal per day. She stated the expectation was the kitchen staff served exactly what was on each residents' meal ticket.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable to residents in taste, temperature and consistency. There were 138 out of 149 residents that were served food fro...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable to residents in taste, temperature and consistency. There were 138 out of 149 residents that were served food from the kitchen. Findings: During the initial screenings on 11/28/2022 the following interviews were conducted: Resident #79 stated the food is terrible, it is bland with no taste and is not warm enough. Resident #73 stated the food is bland with no taste, servings are too small and it is cold. Resident #58 stated the food is bland with no taste and most days he eats the alternate sandwich. Resident #63 stated the kitchen always serves chicken and it is bland with no taste. Resident #111 stated the food is not hot. Resident #100 stated the food is bland with no taste and is always cold. Resident #128 stated everything about the food was horrible. On 11/29/2022 at 12:31 p.m., a test tray for a regular diet was received. The tray contained yellow rice, tamale pie, and green beans. Three surveyors tasted the food and found the rice to be dry with no taste and the tamale pie to be bland with no flavor. On 11/29/2022 at 1:00 p.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #100's lunch tray revealing dry yellow rice mixed with a beef tamale pie with dry tomatoes, a roll was on top of the food, green beans and a cookie. An interview was conducted at this time with Resident #100, he said you can take the tray because I am not eating it, it does not look good. On 11/29/2022 at 1:07 p.m., an interview was conducted with S16CNA. She said she feeds Resident #128 but today he refused to eat because he did not like the food. On 11/29/2022 at 1:11 p.m., an observation was conducted of 8 untouched meal trays on the meal cart. An interview was conducted at that time with S17CNA, she said all 8 trays were returned to the cart after the resident refused to eat it. On 12/01/2022 at 9:59 a.m., an interview was conducted with S18CNA. She said residents complained daily about the food being cold and not tasting good. On 12/01/2022 at 10:12 a.m., an interview was conducted with S12RN. She said she would not eat the food because it does not look appealing. On 12/01/2022 at 10:34 a.m., an interview was conducted with S19CNA. She said she started working at the facility in August of 2022 and all of the residents have complained about the food since she began working here. She said they complain of the taste and the temperature. She said she would not eat the food because it does not look appealing. On 12/01/2022 at 10:38 a.m., an interview was conducted with S20CNA. She said residents complain about the food daily. She said they report the food is cold, does not taste well, and the portions are not enough. On 12/01/2022 at 10:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with S13LPN. She said residents complained about the food daily that the food is cold and does not taste good. On 12/01/2022 at 12:52 p.m., an interview was conducted with S21SSD. She said they get complaints about the kitchen all the time. On 12/01/2022 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM, he stated he was aware of issues with the contracted company for the kitchen. He said they did not have any staff currently monitoring the concerns of the contracted kitchen services.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. This is evidenced by the facility failing to maintain daily temperature logs for food served to residents from the steam table. This deficient practice had the potential to effect all 138 residents who were served food from the facility's kitchen. Findings: Review of facility's policy titled Food Temperatures revealed the following: 1. The [NAME] food temperature log is used to record temperatures at each meal. 3. Temperature logs are maintained in the dining services department per record retention policy. On 11/28/2022 at 12:30 p.m., an interview and observation of the kitchen was conducted with S22DM. No temperature logs were observed completed for food served from the steam table. S22DM verified there were no temperature logs completed from June 2022 to current.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 harm violation(s), $313,544 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 40 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $313,544 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease Staffed?

CMS rates VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease?

State health inspectors documented 40 deficiencies at VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 38 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease?

VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 299 certified beds and approximately 150 residents (about 50% occupancy), it is a large facility located in JACKSON, Louisiana.

How Does Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease Stick Around?

VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease Ever Fined?

VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE has been fined $313,544 across 2 penalty actions. This is 8.7x the Louisiana average of $36,214. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease on Any Federal Watch List?

VILLA FELICIANA CHRONIC DISEASE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.