OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY

2614 JEFFERSON HWY, 3RD FLOOR, JEFFERSON, LA 70121 (504) 314-4249
Non profit - Corporation 30 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
83/100
#13 of 264 in LA
Share this report: Email Text Facebook WhatsApp
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #13 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 12 in Jefferson County, meaning only one local facility is rated higher. The facility's performance is stable, with three issues reported in both 2024 and 2025, and it has good staffing ratings with a low turnover rate of 30%, indicating that staff members tend to stay longer. However, there are some concerns, including a serious incident where a resident fell while unattended in the shower and required spinal surgery, along with deficiencies in monitoring residents on psychotropic medications and the presence of expired medical supplies, which could pose risks. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and a strong state ranking, families should be aware of the recent incidents and ensure they are comfortable with the quality of care provided.

Trust Score
B+
83/100
In Louisiana
#13/264
Top 4%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Holding Steady
3 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
30% turnover. Near Louisiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$8,186 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 106 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Louisiana nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
○ Average
6 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
↔
Stable
2024: 3 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (30%)

    18 points below Louisiana average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 30%

16pts below Louisiana avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $8,186

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 6 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Mar 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure three expired bags of 5% dextrose solut...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure three expired bags of 5% dextrose solution were not available for resident use in 1 (Medication Room b) of 2 (Medication Room a, Medication Room b) medication rooms observed; and, 2. Ensure an expired sterile intravenous (IV) catheter was not available for resident use in 1 (Workstation on Wheels [WOW] a) of 3 (WOW a, WOW b, WOW c) WOWs observed. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Medication Security and Storage policy and procedure dated [DATE] revealed, in part, medications will be stored in a manner consistent with manufacturer recommendations and applicable federal, state, and local laws. Observation on [DATE] at 9:45AM of Medication Room b revealed: - Two 50 milliliter (mL) bags of 5% dextrose injection solution with an expiration date of 01/2025; and, - One 50 mL bag of 5% dextrose injection solution with an expiration date of 09/2024. Review of the [NAME] Product Expiration Date Extension document dated [DATE] revealed, in part, the above mentioned 50 mL bags of 5% dextrose injection solution expiration dates were not extended as a result of the intravenous solution shortage. In an interview on [DATE] at 9:50AM, S11Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the above mentioned 50 mL bags of 5% dextrose injection solution located in Medication Room b were expired, and should not have been available for resident use. In an interview on [DATE] at 9:55AM, S1Administrator could offer no further explanation as to why the above mentioned 50 mL bags of 5% dextrose injection solution were expired and available for resident use. 2. Observation on [DATE] at 10:15AM of WOW a revealed a 24 gauge (G) x ¾ inch (in.) Introcan sterile safety IV catheter with an expiration date of [DATE]. Review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare facilities dated 2008 and updated in [DATE] revealed, in part, any item that has been sterilized should not be used after the expiration date for that item has been exceeded. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:30AM, S10LPN confirmed the above mentioned IV catheter in WOW a was expired, and available for resident use and should not have been. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:40AM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the above mentioned IV catheter was expired and offered no further explanation as to why the IV catheter was in WOW a and available for resident use.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff members followed isolation precaution...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff members followed isolation precautions for 3 (S5Registered Nurse [RN], S6Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN], S8Rehabilitation Technician [RT]) of 3 (S5RN, S6LPN, S8RT) staff members observed for adherence to isolation precautions. Findings: Resident #190 Review of the facility's Isolation policy and procedure dated 03/08/2021 revealed, in part, airborne, contact, and droplet precautions required all who entered the room to wear gown, gloves, eye protection (face shield or goggles), and an N-95 respirator. Review of Resident #190's medical record revealed Resident #190 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a positive Covid-19 test result from the same date. Review of Resident #190's March 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 03/03/2025 for airborne, contact, and droplet isolation precautions. Observation on 03/05/2025 at 12:13PM revealed Resident #190 had an airborne, contact, and droplet precautions sign on his door indicating an N-95 mask, eye protection (face shield or goggles), gown, and gloves should be put on before entering the room. Further observation revealed no eye protection was available for use in the isolation door caddy. Observation on 03/05/2025 at 12:15PM revealed S5RN entered Resident #190's room without eye protection on. Further observation revealed S5RN was in direct contact with Resident #190 while in Resident #190's room. In an interview on 03/05/2025 at 12:58PM, S5RN confirmed Resident #190 was on airborne, contact, and droplet isolation precautions for Covid-19. S5RN further indicated only an N-95 mask, gown, and gloves were required to be worn while inside an airborne, contact, and droplet isolation precautions room. Observation on 03/06/2025 at 9:05AM revealed S6LPN entered Resident #190's room without eye protection on. Further observation revealed S6LPN was in direct contact with Resident #190 while in Resident #190's room. In an interview on 03/07/2025 at 10:37AM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #190 was on airborne, contact, and droplet isolation precautions. S2DON further indicated all personnel should have put on eye protection before entering Resident #190's room in accordance with the facility's policy. In an interview on 03/07/2025 at 11:15AM, S9Infection Control Director confirmed staff members were required to wear eye protection when entering an airborne, contact, and droplet isolation precautions room in accordance with the facility's policy. Resident #182 Review of the facility's Isolation policy and procedure dated 03/08/2021 revealed, in part, protective precautions are used for patients that are immunocompromised. Review of Resident #182's March 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 02/19/2025 for continuous enhanced respiratory precautions due to Resident #182's history of cancer. Observation on 03/07/2025 at 10:00AM revealed, Resident #182 had an Enhanced Respiratory Precautions sign on her door indicating a mask should be put on before entering the room. Observation on 03/07/2025 at 10:07AM revealed S8RT was in Resident #182's room, sitting on the sofa next to Resident #182 without a mask on. In an interview on 03/07/2025 at 10:10AM, S8RT confirmed she was sitting in Resident #182's room without a mask on and should not have been. In an interview on 03/07/2025 at 10:37AM, S2DON confirmed Resident #182 was on Enhanced Respiratory Precautions. S2DON further confirmed anyone who entered Resident #182's room should have put a mask on before entering.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychotropic medications were adequ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychotropic medications were adequately monitored for targeted behaviors for 4 (Resident #6, Resident #12, Resident #182, Resident #186) of 5 (Resident #6, Resident #12, Resident #29, Resident #182, Resident #186) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident #6 Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/19/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #6 received medications for depression and anxiety. Review of Resident #6's March 2025 Physician's orders revealed, in part, orders for: - Bupropion (a medication used to treat depression) tablet 150 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily; and, - Clonazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) tablet 0.5 mg by mouth twice daily. There was no documented evidence, and the facility was unable to present any documented evidence, Resident #6 was evaluated for targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences of psychotropic medications. Resident #12 Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/18/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #12 received medications for depression and anxiety. Review of Resident #12's March 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, and order dated 02/14/2025 for fluoxetine (a medication used to treat depression) 20 mg capsule by mouth nightly. Review of Resident #12's care plan with a start date of 02/11/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #12's care plan had a care plan for depression with no approaches related to antidepressant medication therapy and/or monitoring for targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences of antidepressant medications. There was no documented evidence, and the facility was unable to present any documented evidence, Resident #12 was evaluated for targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences of psychotropic medications. In an interview on 03/06/2025 at 4:15PM, S6Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed Resident #12 was on a psychotropic medication. S6LPN further indicated she did not routinely monitor Resident #12 for targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences of psychotropic medications. Resident #182 Review of Resident #182's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #182's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/26/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #182 received medications for anxiety. Review of Resident #182's March 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, and order dated 02/19/2025 for clonazepam tablet 0.5 mg by mouth nightly. Review of Resident #182's care plan with a start date of 02/19/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #182's care plan for anxiety had no approaches related to antianxiety medication therapy and/or monitoring targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences of antianxiety medications. There was no documented evidence, and the facility was unable to present any documented evidence, Resident #182 was evaluated for targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences of psychotropic medications. In an interview on 03/06/2025 at 4:08PM, S13LPN indicated she was not aware Resident #182 was on any psychotropic medications. Resident #186 Review of Resident #186's medical record revealed, in part, Resident #186 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of depression. Review of Resident #186's care plan with a start date of 02/27/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #186's depression care plan had no approaches related to antidepressant medication therapy and/or monitoring targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences of antidepressant medications. Review of Resident #186's March 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 02/27/2025 for escitalopram (a medication used to treat depression)10 mg capsule by mouth daily. There was no documented evidence, and the facility was unable to present any documented evidence, Resident #186 was evaluated for targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences of psychotropic medications. In an interview on 03/06/2025 at 3:00PM, S3Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) indicated there was no documented evidence the above mentioned residents were routinely monitored for targeted behaviors of psychotropic medications. In an interview on 03/06/2025 at 3:50PM, S12Pharmacist indicated the above mentioned residents who were prescribed a psychotropic medication should have been monitored every shift for targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences related to their psychotropic medication use. In an interview on 03/07/2025 at 10:37AM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the facility could not provide any documented evidence the above mentioned residents were assessed and/or monitored for targeted behaviors and/or adverse consequences of psychotropic medications.
May 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prev...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents by failing to ensure a resident assessed as being at high risk for falls and dependent on staff for showering was not left unattended and/or unseen in the shower. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm on 04/29/2024, when Resident #1's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), S7CNA, turned her back and left Resident #1 alone in the shower of the bathroom. Resident #1 sustained a fall with injury in the shower on 04/29/2024 which required Tranforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) from Lumbar 3 spine vertebra to Lumbar 5 spine vertebra (spinal bones) repair surgery on 05/01/2024. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the skilled nursing facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis, in part, of post-operative Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) from Lumbar 3 to Lumbar spine 5. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date of 04/12/2024 revealed, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, cognitively intact. Resident #1 was assessed as dependent on staff for tub/shower transfers; the resident required substantial/maximal assistance during shower/baths. Review of Resident #1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed a score of 10 and identified as being at high risk for falls. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 04/05/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1's injury risk prevention included to assess the assistance levels required for safety, provide support for activities of daily living, and to determine the need for increased observation. Review of Resident #1's Physical Therapy Note dated 04/19/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 presented with limitations in performance of self-care and self-care skills, impaired endurance, impaired functional mobility, unsteady gait, decreased self-awareness, and decreased lower extremity function. Review of Resident #1's Nurse Progress Note dated 04/26/2024 at 11:40 a.m. revealed, in part, Resident #1 was witnessed by staff getting up multiple times without calling for assistance or waiting for help. Further review revealed Resident #1 often reported dizziness when getting up. Review of facility's Incident Occurrence Log dated April 2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 experienced a fall with severe harm on 04/29/2024. In a phone interview on 05/21/2024 at 9:47 a.m., Resident #1's daughter-in-law indicated Resident #1 told her she (Resident #1) was left alone in the shower. Resident #1's daughter-in-law further indicated S2CNA told Resident #1 she would be back and instructed her to call if she needed anything while in the shower. Resident #1's daughter-in-law further indicated Resident #1 kept pulling the call light cord in Resident #1's bathroom prior to falling, but facility staff did not respond to the repeated calls from the call bell. Resident #1's daughter-in-law indicated S4Orthopedic Surgeon stated after Resident #1's surgery on 05/01/2024, that Resident #1's orthopedic screws in her spine that were placed on 04/02/2024 were now loose, and the only way orthopedic screws can become loose was by an incident, fall, or infection. In a telephone interview on 05/21/2024 at 12:04 p.m., Resident #1's son indicated he received a call from S6Director of Nursing (DON) and was told his mother, Resident #1, was left alone in the bathroom and was trying to get up from the shower bench alone in the bathroom and fell. In a telephone interview on 05/21/2024 at 12:07 p.m., Resident #1 indicated S2Certified Nursing Assistant put her in the shower sitting on the shower bench and then turned the water on. Resident #1 further indicated S2CNA informed her (Resident #1) that she was going down the hall, and would come back and assist her (Resident #1). Resident #1 then indicated S2CNA left the room. Resident #1 further indicated she was waiting for assistance after using the call light for a while, but staff did not respond, so she got up from the shower bench, and then slipped and fell. In an interview on 05/20/2024 at 11:03 a.m., S2CNA indicated, she was present in Resident #1's bathroom when Resident #1 was sitting on the shower bench showering. S2CNA further indicated she turned her back on Resident #1 to get Resident #1's clothes off of the bed, and when she turned back to face Resident #1, Resident #1 was on the floor in the bathroom near the shower. S2CNA further indicated she did not witness the fall. In an interview on 05/20/2024 at 1:22 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident #1 was sent to an orthopedic appointment on 04/29/2024 after the fall and was admitted to an acute care hospital on [DATE] and had orthopedic surgery on 05/01/2024 for fusion of spine, posterior approach L3 to pelvis revision. She further stated the resident was discharged from the acute care hospital to another skilled nursing facility on 05/08/2024. Review of S3Medical Doctor Progress Note dated 05/01/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1's principle problem was status post TLIF Lumbar spine 3 to Lumbar spine 5 with [NAME] repair on 04/02/2024 and failure of TLIF Lumbar spine 3 to Lumbar spine 5 with hardware failure likely secondary to a ground level fall. Review of S4Orthopedic Spine Surgeon Post-Operative Progress Note dated 05/01/2024 revealed, in part, Lumbar spine 5 had loose screws and hardware failure. Review of S4Orthopedic Spine Surgeon Follow-Up Progress Note dated 05/02/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #1 was seen 05/02/2024 for a post-operative orthopedic visit for revision of Lumbar spine 3 to pelvis on 05/01/2024. Further review revealed Resident #1 had history of TLIF Lumbar spine 3 to Lumbar spine 5 on 04/22/24, and presented with hardware failure likely secondary to a ground level fall. In an interview on 05/20/2024 at 2:19 p.m., S1Administrator further indicated Resident #1 was a one person assist, and did not feel it was a wrong practice when S2CNA turned her back on Resident #1 while Resident #1 was in the shower. In an interview on 05/21/2024 at 10:30 a.m., S1Administrator indicated her investigation of Resident #1's fall on 04/29/2024 was based solely on facility staff reports. S1Administrator further indicated S2CNA did turn her back on Resident #1, but it was her belief S2CNA was in the room with Resident #1. In a telephone interview on 05/21/2024 at 11:12 a.m., S5Physicians Assistant for S4Orthopedic Spine Surgeon indicated she personally saw Resident #1 in the office after the fall at the facility on 04/29/2024, and agreed with S4Orthopedic Spine Surgeon that a result of loose orthopedic screws can occur from an incident, fall, or infections. S5Physicians Assistant further indicated cultures were taken at the time of surgery on 05/01/2024, which was negative for infection. Review of Resident #1's 05/01/2024 Laboratory Report for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) Culture ( a sample of bodily fluid used to diagnose infections caused by acid-fast bacilli bacteria) revealed it was negative, with no acid fast bacilli seen.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0836 (Tag F0836)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was not employed after having a conviction that barred employment in accordance with state law f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was not employed after having a conviction that barred employment in accordance with state law for 1 (S7CNA) of 5 (S7CNA, S8CNA, S9CNA, S10CNA, and S11CNA), unlicensed personnel criminal background checks reviewed. Findings: Review of the Louisiana Revised Statute 40:1203.3 revealed, in part, criminal convictions that bar an employer from hiring a non-licensed person included, in part, the following: Distribution or possession with the intent to distribute controlled dangerous substances as listed in Schedules I through V of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act. Statutory references for these convictions are as follows: 40:966 Penalty for distribution or 40:966 Penalty for distribution or possession with intent to distribute narcotic drugs listed in Schedule 1; 40:967 Prohibited acts - Schedule II penalties; 40:968 Prohibited acts - Schedule III penalties; 40:969 Prohibited acts - Schedule IV penalties; 40:970 Prohibited acts - Schedule V penalties; and, 40:971 Prohibited acts - all schedules. Review of S7CNA's criminal background check(s) revealed, in part, the following: 04/10/2004 RS 40:966 Manufacturing/Distribution/Possession of Schedule I (drug with no current accepted medical use and has high potential for abuse) marijuana (chemical compound in cannabis plant that has various psychological and physiological effects on the human body) RS 40:966 1 count. Further review revealed no final disposition of the above, and the provider did not present a final disposition of the above mentioned charge. 01/16/2005 RS 40:1033 Drug Paraphernalia (equipment, product, or material used for the purpose of planting, cultivating, manufacturing, producing, processing, packaging, storing, or concealing a controlled substance); and RS 40:967 Prohibited Acts (unlawful for any person to sell, lend, rent, lease, give, exchange, or otherwise distribute to any person any drug paraphernalia). Schedule II (drugs or chemical with high potential for abuse and potentially leading to severe psychological or physical dependence) 2 counts (convicted). 04/12/2007 RS 40:1033 Prohibited Acts/Drug Paraphernalia 40:1033 Prohibited Acts Schedule II 40:967 2 counts. Further review revealed no final disposition of the above, and the provider did not present a final disposition of the above mentioned charge. 11/18/2009 RS 40:967 Schedule II Drugs Distribution Scheduled II possession 28 to 200 grams of cocaine 2 counts (convicted), Warrant 12/06/2012. Review of S7CNA's criminal background check dated 08/12/2021 and with a completion date of 08/27/2024 revealed, in part: Distribution of Drug - Schedule II felony, guilty 01/04/2013 Sentencing summary: 5 years prison, 3 years suspended. Possession of Cocaine - 28 grams to 200 grams, felony, and guilty 01/04/2013 Sentencing summary: 5 years prison, 3 years suspended and was incarcerated. There was no documented evidence and the facility did not present any documented evidence to dispute the above mentioned findings. In an interview on 05/22/2024 at 10:56 a.m., S12Human Resource Director indicated he/she was aware of the above mentioned findings, that S7CNA was hired on 08/27/2024, and as of 05/22/2024, S7CNA was still employed at the facility. The surveyor requested a copy of S7CNA's criminal background check. The facility allowed the surveyor to review the criminal background check, but refused to provide a copy of S7CNA's criminal background check as requested. In an interview on 05/22/2024 at 1:03 p.m., S13Manager Regulatory and Environment Safety indicated the surveyor cannot keep a copy of S7CNA's background check to protect employees.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure S5Dietary Staff wore personal protective eq...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure S5Dietary Staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) when they entered an isolation room for 1 (Resident #34) of 1 (Resident #34) residents reviewed for transmission base precautions. Findings: Review of Resident #34's clinical record revealed was admitted [DATE] and subsequently tested positive on 03/22/2024 for Covid-19, an upper respiratory infection, and transmission based precautions enacted from 03/22/2024 through 04/01/2024. Review of the facility's policy titled, Isolation Policy, dated 03/08/2021revealed, in part, all persons who entered the room of residents on airborne, contact, and droplet isolation were required to wear a gown, gloves, eye protection (face shield and goggles) and N-95 respirator. The isolation policy further revealed a gown, gloves, and respirator must be worn regardless of patient contact. Observation on 03/26/2024 at 11:03 a.m. revealed Resident #34 had signage posted on the door of Room A for airborne, droplet, and contact precautions; along with the appropriate PPE supplies on the door. Observation on 03/26/2024 at 12:15 p.m. revealed S5Dietary Staff entered Resident #34's room, without putting on PPE. In an interview on 03/26/2024 at 12:16 p.m., S5 Dietary Staff indicated she always entered the room of residents on isolation precautions, without putting on any PPE. In an interview on 03/27/2024 at 11:56 a.m., S3Director Infection Control confirmed S5Dietary Staff did not follow the facility's infection control policy.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Louisiana.
  • • 30% turnover. Below Louisiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 6 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility Staffed?

CMS rates OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 30%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility?

State health inspectors documented 6 deficiencies at OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY during 2024 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 5 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility?

OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 30 certified beds and approximately 28 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in JEFFERSON, Louisiana.

How Does Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (30%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility Stick Around?

OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY has a staff turnover rate of 30%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility Ever Fined?

OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY has been fined $8,186 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,161. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Ochsner Medical Center Skilled Nursing Facility on Any Federal Watch List?

OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.

OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER SKILLED NURSING FACILITY

2614 JEFFERSON HWY, 3RD FLOOR, JEFFERSON, LA 70121 | (504) 314-4249

B+
Trust Grade (83/100)
5.0
CMS Rating
6
Deficiencies

Strengths

  • 5-star staffing
  • 4-star quality

Concerns

  • Review findings

Ask about: Rn Coverage

nursinghomedata.org | Data: CMS November 2025