LASALLE NURSING HOME

139 NINTH STREET, JENA, LA 71342 (318) 992-6627
Government - Hospital district 133 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
83/100
#10 of 264 in LA
Share this report: Email Text Facebook WhatsApp
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

LaSalle Nursing Home in Jena, Louisiana has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating that it is above average and is recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #10 out of 264 nursing homes in Louisiana, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and is the best option out of 2 in LaSalle County. The facility's trend is stable, with the same number of issues reported in 2023 and 2024, and it has a decent staffing rating of 4/5 stars, with a turnover rate of 35%, which is lower than the state average. However, there are some concerns, including $7,443 in fines which is average, and specific incidents such as a resident being transferred without proper assistance, resulting in a significant injury, and issues related to medication management for other residents. Overall, while LaSalle has strengths in staffing and overall ratings, families should also be aware of the serious incident and other care concerns.

Trust Score
B+
83/100
In Louisiana
#10/264
Top 3%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Holding Steady
3 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
35% turnover. Near Louisiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$7,443 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 23 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
○ Average
8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
↔
Stable
2023: 3 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (35%)

    13 points below Louisiana average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 35%

11pts below Louisiana avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $7,443

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Aug 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #40) of 1 sampled resident who was identified a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #40) of 1 sampled resident who was identified as a smoker. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan dated 01/22/2018 revealed the following including: Policy: The facility will complete person centered, comprehensive plans of care for each resident that will identify specific resident problems (or potential for problem), and will include measurable goals and interventions for each problem identified. Observation on 08/12/2024 at 2:56 p.m. of Resident #40 revealed he was sitting in his room preparing a cup of coffee. He was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. He stated he was able to smoke whenever he wanted and he kept his cigarettes with him. Observation on 08/13/2024 at 8:49 a.m. revealed Resident #40 sitting outside in his wheelchair smoking. He was without supervision although the area he was sitting was surrounded by glass. Safe smoking was observed. Review of Resident #40's facility record revealed an admit date of 03/30/2023 with the following diagnoses including: Major Depressive Disorder; Weakness; and Parkinson's. Review of Resident #40's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/12/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 15. Review of Resident #40's Care Plan revealed no information concerning smoking. Review of Resident #40's 05/15/2024 Smoking Safety Evaluation revealed the following including: Resident continues to smoke safely in designated smoking areas per facility protocol. Interview on 08/13/2024 at 9:35 a.m. with S1 DON and S2 MDS Nurse confirmed Resident #40 was not care planned for smoking and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who received psychotropic medications were monitored for behaviors and side effects for 2 (#36 and #49) of 5 (#25, #36...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who received psychotropic medications were monitored for behaviors and side effects for 2 (#36 and #49) of 5 (#25, #36, #42, #49, and #50) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident # 36 Review of Resident #36's medical records revealed an admit date of 10/19/2021 with diagnoses that included; Unspecified Dementia, with behavioral disturbance, Psychotic disturbance, and Mood disturbance, Depression, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident # 36's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 06/24/2024 revealed a BIMS of 03, which indicates severe cognition impairment. Review of Resident #36's 08/2024 Physician's Order read in part 05/08/2024: Alprazolam, Give 0.25mg by mouth, twice daily for Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified Dementia and Other Behavioral Disturbances. 05/07/2024: Seroquel, Give 24mg by mouth at bedtime for Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified Dementia and Other Behavioral Disturbances. 03/27/2024: Zoloft, Give 25mg by mouth at bedtime for Depression. Review of Resident #36's Care Plan with a review date of 10/11/2024 read in part Risk for crying, drowsiness related to a diagnosis of Depression Intervention: Observe and address signs and symptoms of Depression such as crying, drowsiness, social isolation, irritability, little interest in things once enjoyed. Document and report to Medical Director if persist. Observe for any change in mood, behavior, or cognitive status. Document and report to Medical Director. Risk for side effects of Psychotropic drugs related to antianxiety, antidepressant and antipsychotic use. Interventions: Observe and address side effects related to psychotropic drug use such as sedation, increase confusion, increase agitation, increase anxiety, orthostatic hypotension, rigidity, tremors, lip smacking, abnormal face or jaw movement, abnormal lip movement, abnormal leg/arm movement. Document & report to Medical Director. Review of Resident #36's Medication Administration Record revealed the Medication Behaviors Monitoring tool was blank for the month of 07/2024 and 08/2024. Review of Resident #36's Medication Side effects Monitoring tool for the month of 07/2024 and 08/2024 revealed monitoring was done on 07/03/2024, 08/5/2024, 08/06/2024, and 08/07/2024 and all other days of 07/2024 and 08/2024 were left blank. Interview on 08/14/2024 at 9:19 a.m. with S4 LPN revealed she documented behaviors for residents on the behavior and side effect tool if behaviors occur, otherwise she does not document on the behavior/side effect tool. Interview on 08/14/2024 at 9:26 a.m. with S1 DON revealed the nurses should be documenting any behaviors exhibited by resident regardless if they are new or normal behaviors. S1 DON revealed any new abnormal behaviors should also be documented in nursing notes and that the Physician rounds on residents every two weeks and staff are to communicates any behaviors residents may have. S1 DON confirmed that Medication Side effects and Behavior monitoring was not completed daily but should have been. Resident #49 Review of Resident 49's medical record revealed an admit date of 05/24/2024, with diagnoses that included: Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Heart Failure, Unspecified Dementia, and Insomnia. Review of Resident #49's admission MDS with a Target date of 06/04/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitve impairment. Review of Resident #49's Care Plan with a Target date of 09/12/2024 revealed in part .Potential risk for difficulty falling asleep related to diagnosis of Insomnia. Potential risk for side effects related to psychotropic drug use related to Hypnotic use, with interventions that included: Observe for adverse side effects such as sedation, increase in Confusion, increased Anxiety, and Orthostatic Hypotension. Document and report to Medical Doctor. Review of Resident #49's 08/2024 Medication Administration Record revealed in part .Temazepam (Restoril) give 7.5 MG by mouth at bedtime related to Insomnia, Unspecified. The Medication Administration Record had no documented Behavior Monitoring for Temazepam. Review of Resident #49's Gradual Dose Reduction sheet dated 07/02/2024 revealed in part .Resident currently taking Temazepam 7.5 MG every night. Medical Doctor noted resident still exhibiting behavioral symptoms at the present dose and further decrease would only make symptoms worse. Interview on 08/13/2024 at 3:55 p.m. with S1 DON confirmed Resident #49 had no documented behaviors on his behavioral monitoring sheet. S1 DON revealed the floor nurses were responsible for documenting behaviors. S1 DON confirmed Resident #49's behavior monitoring sheet was blank and should not have been.
Aug 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed a resident's person centered plan of care, by...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed a resident's person centered plan of care, by failing to use two person physical assistance when transferring a resident from wheelchair to bed for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5) sampled residents. This failed practice resulted in an actual harm situation for Resident #1 on 07/25/2023 at 7:25 p.m., when S5 CNA transferred the resident from a chair to bed without assistance of another staff, as indicated on her plan of care. S5 CNA did not review the plan of care for transfer instructions prior to the transfer. Resident #1 sustained a large laceration to her left lower extremity, and was transferred to the ER. ER Physical Exam revealed: Leg 6cmx3cm flap abrasion present over inferior-lateral aspect of left leg. Procedure: Flap into subcutaneous, repair wound closed with sutures #5 2-0 Ethilon sutures. Clinical impression: Abrasion/contusion. Flap injury into subcutaneous tissue layer. Findings: Review of the facility's Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting policy revealed in part . Policy Statement - All accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The Nurse Supervisor/ Charge Nurse and /or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident. Review of the facility's Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents policy revealed in part . Policy Statement - In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Resident safety, dignity, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents. 2. Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible. 3. Nursing staff, in conjunction with the rehabilitation staff, shall assess individual residents' needs for transfer assistance on an ongoing basis. Review of Resident #1's Medical Record revealed an admission date of 04/13/2023 with diagnoses that included Anxiety Disorder, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Right Dominant Side, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Edema, Low Back Pain, COPD, Osteoarthritis, Lack of Coordination and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Review of Resident #1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score 14 indicative of Resident #1 was at High Risk for falls. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/10/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 11, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #1 required extensive 1 person physical assist for bed mobility, bathing, dressing and toileting; and required 2 person physical assist for transfers. Resident #1 had ROM impairment on one side for upper extremities. Resident #1 required wheelchair device for mobility. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan with a Target date of 10/30/2023 revealed in part . Resident #1 at risk for injury r/t Fall Potential secondary to history of falls with goal to remain free of fall r/t injury AEB no falls. Interventions included in part . to assist with transfers 2 person assist or use stand up lift. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders for 08/2023 revealed to cleanse area to LLE with NS, pat dry, apply small amount of TAO, cover with collagen a non-adherent pad and secure with tape daily until healed. Review of Incident Report for Resident #1 dated 07/26/2023 at 8:29 a.m. revealed in part . Incident occurred 07/25/2023 at 7:25 p.m. Location of incident: Resident #1's room. Type of Injury - Laceration. Protective Action - Resident #1 evaluated in ER, RP notified. Incident Description -S5 CNA was assisting resident to bed and resident left leg got bumped on ¼ side rail that was in low position resulting in laceration to left lower leg. POC established Resident #1 was 2 person assist and S5 CNA failed to follow POC by transferring resident by herself. Review of Resident #1's Nurses Notes documented by S4 LPN dated 07/25/2023 at 10:29 p.m. read in part . At 7:25 p.m. called to Resident #1's room per S5 CNA, stated when S5 CNA was transferring Resident #1 to bed, Resident #1 would not let go of the bed and received a skin tear on her left lower leg. This nurse went to room and assessed area. Area noted to be a very large skin tear. Unable to approximate edges. Area bleeding moderate amount. Area cleansed with normal saline and Vaseline gauze applied and wrapped with Kerlex. ER notified of this and order noted to send to ER for evaluation and treatment. Daughter notified. B/P 138/72, P72, R18, T98. At 7:45 p.m. Resident #1 transferred to ER per stretcher accompanied by 2 CNAs. Review of ED Notes with an admission date of 07/25/2023 at 7:51 p.m. revealed in part . Chief Complaint: Skin Tear left lower leg. Onset: just prior to arrival from NH. Sustained a gash injury while transferring in her room. Minimal discomfort by patient. Physical Exam revealed no acute distress, left foot/ ankle slightly edematous normal inspection, Non-tender, Leg 6cmx3cm flap abrasion present over inferior-lateral aspect of left leg. Procedure: Flap into subcutaneous, repair wound closed with sutures #5 2-0 Ethilon sutures. X-ray of left leg without evidence of fracture. Clinical impression: Abrasion/contusion. Flap injury into subcutaneous tissue layer. Disposition to NH. Condition improved. Plan of Care: Tetanus toxoid, wound approximated. NH advised to double Lasix dosing and check with PCP. Telephone interview on 08/21/2023 at 4:15 p.m. with S4 LPN revealed she was called to Resident #1's room by S5 CNA when she assessed Resident #1 and noted a large laceration with moderate amount of bleeding to her left lower leg. S4 LPN revealed she cleansed the area with NS, applied Vaseline gauze and a Kerlex wrap. S4 LPN revealed she called report to ER, sent Resident #1 to ER for evaluation and treatment as ordered, notified Resident #1's RP of incident, and sent to ER. S4 LPN confirmed she was aware Resident #1 needed 2 person assist for transfers according to Resident #1's plan of care, and S5 CNA did not follow Resident #1's plan of care, and should not have transferred Resident #1 by herself. Telephone interview on 08/22/2023 at 9:18 p.m. with S5 CNA revealed she worked on 07/25/2023 on the 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. shift, and cared for Resident #1. S5 CNA revealed she did not check Resident #1's plan of care prior to the incident when she transferred Resident #1 by herself from her chair to bed. S5 CNA revealed Resident #1 was holding onto the bed side rail and did not move her leg to turn to get into bed, when her leg hit the side of the bed. S5 CNA revealed once she got Resident #1 into the bed, she noticed the cut to her left lower leg and called out to S4 LPN who was outside of resident's room on the hall. S5 CNA revealed S4 LPN came and assessed Resident #1 and sent Resident #1 to the ER. S5 CNA revealed Resident #1 needed 2 persons assist for transferring from her wheelchair to bed, and should not have transferred Resident #1 by herself. Interview on 08/23/2023 at 4:20 p.m. with S3 CNA Supervisor revealed according to Resident #1's plan of care, Resident #1 required 2 person assist for transfers. S3 CNA Supervisor confirmed S5 CNA said she did not check Resident #1's plan of care on the kiosk or [NAME] before she transferred Resident #1 by herself, and should have. Interview on 08/23/2023 at 4:30 p.m. with S1 ADM revealed after completion of investigation of Resident #1's incident, it was deemed that S5 CNA had not followed the plan of care for Resident #1. S1 ADM revealed S5 CNA had just returned from a leave of absence. S1 ADM revealed Resident #1's plan of care was one person assist for transfers prior to S5 CNA's leave of absence. She stated S5 CNA admitted to not checking Resident #1's plan of care at the beginning of her shift, and before she transferred resident by herself, and should have. S1 ADM confirmed S5 CNA should have followed Resident #1's plan of care and transferred Resident #1 with 2 person physical assist and did not. Interview on 08/24/2023 at 10:30 a.m. with S2 DON revealed S5 CNA had confessed as to not checking Resident #1's plan of care at the beginning of her shift. S2 DON revealed S5 CNA was not aware that Resident #1 required 2 person assist since her return from leave of absence. S2 DON revealed Resident #1's MDS and care plan stated Resident #1 required 2 people for transfers. S2 DON confirmed S5 CNA transferred Resident #1 from her wheelchair to her bed without assistance and should not have.
Jul 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

FACILITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to electronically submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll, to CMS as required. Findings: Revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
FACILITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to electronically submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll, to CMS as required. Findings: Review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 2 2023 (January 1-March 31) revealed triggers for the following: 1. One star staffing rating, 2. No RN hours, and 3. Failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day. Interview on 07/25/2023 at 2:55 p.m. with S1 Administrator revealed S3 Human Resources was responsible for submitting the facility's PBJ information. Interview on 07/25/2023 at 2:57 p.m. with S3 Human Resources revealed she was responsible for submitting PBJ information for nursing staff and therapy department. S3 Human Resources stated she submitted the PBJ information for FY Quarter 2 2023 in April of 2023. Review of PBJ Final File Validation report dated 04/06/2023 revealed Total Employee Records submitted was 5. Interview on 07/25/2023 at 3:00 p.m. with S3 Human Resources revealed she had mistakenly submitted the therapy department's PBJ information twice and had not submitted nursing staff PBJ information for FY Quarter 2 2023 and should have.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Resident #49 A review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/16/2022 with diagnoses that included in part: Parkinson's, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Dementia, Congestive H...

Read full inspector narrative →
Resident #49 A review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/16/2022 with diagnoses that included in part: Parkinson's, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Dementia, Congestive Heart Failure, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. A review of Resident #49's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 05/12/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 03 (indicating severe cognitive impairment). Resident received antipsychotic, anticoagulant, and diuretic medications. A review of Resident #49's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed the Resident was at risk for side effects of psychotropic drug use. Interventions included in part: Pharmacist to review current drug regime for contraindications and possible reduction per protocol and report to doctor. A review of Resident #49's 07/2023 Physician Orders read in part: Nuplazid 34mg by mouth daily related to Parkinson's, and Psychotic Disorder with Delusions. Interview on 07/26/2023 at 11:45 a.m. with S2 DON revealed a Gradual Dose Reduction had not been completed for Resident #49's psychotropic medication. S2 DON confirmed a Gradual Dose Reduction should have been completed, but had not. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who use psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions for 2 (#46, #49) of 5 (#2, #15, #33, #46, #49) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident #46: A review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/22/2022 with diagnoses that included: Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dysphagia, and Insomnia. A review of Resident #46's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 06/26/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 99 (indicating the BIMS was unable to be completed). A review of Resident #46's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed the Resident was at risk for side effects of psychotropic drug use. Interventions included in part: Pharmacist to review current drug regime for contraindications and possible reduction per protocol and report to doctor. A review of Resident #46's 07/2023 Physician Orders read in part: Restoril 7.5mg give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime related to Insomnia. An interview with S2 DON on 07/26/2023 at 11:10 a.m. confirmed that a Gradual Dose Reduction had not been completed and signed by a physician since starting the pyschotropic medication in June of 2022.
Jul 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Resident #6 Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards and according to the resident's plan of care for...

Read full inspector narrative →
Resident #6 Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards and according to the resident's plan of care for 1 ( #6) of 32 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered for Resident #6 who required continuous oxygen therapy. Findings: Review of Resident #6's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/22/2020 with diagnoses that included Atherosclerosis Heart Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Essential Primary Hypertension, Left Ventricular Failure, Presence of Heart Valve Replacement, Shortness of Breath and Personal history of Covid-19. Review of Physician's Orders for the month of 7/2022 for Resident #6 revealed an order for oxygen at 2 liters/minute per oxygen nasal cannula, continuous every shift related to COPD and SOB. Review of Resident #6's Care plan with target date of 8/02/2022 revealed a potential risk for COPD exacerbation, wheezing and shortness of breath related to a diagnosis of COPD. Interventions with a focus of COPD included to administer oxygen as ordered. Observation on 07/18/2022 at 11:52 a.m. revealed Resident #6 lying in bed awake with oxygen in progress at 3 liters/minute via nasal cannula per oxygen concentrator. Observation on 07/19/2022 at 08:38 a.m. revealed Resident #6 lying in bed with oxygen in progress at 3 liters/minute via nasal cannula. Interview on 07/19/22 at 03:00 p.m. with S2 LPN revealed Resident #6 had an order for oxygen continuous every shift at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula. Observation on 07/19/22 at 03:05 p.m. accompanied by S1 DON and S2 LPN revealed Resident #6 lying in bed with oxygen in progress at 3 liters/minute via nasal cannula per oxygen concentrator. Interview with S1 DON and S2 LPN at the time of observation confirmed Resident #6's oxygen concentrator was set at 3 liters/minute and should have been set at 2 liters/minute instead.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs....

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. The facility failed to evaluate the appropriateness for the continued use of a PRN psychotropic medication beyond 14 days for 1 (#32) of 5 (#20, #29, #32, #42, and #54) resident's sampled for unnecessary medications. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled: Drug Regimen Review Policy and Procedure revealed in part . Clinically significant medication issues may include, but are not limited to: 1. Medication dose, frequency, route or duration not consistent with resident's condition, manufacturer's instructions, or applicable standards of practice. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Anxiety Disorder, COPD, and Anorexia. Review of Resident #32's Physician's Orders revealed in part Alprazolam tablet 0.25mg give 1 tablet by mouth qHS prn for anxiety related to Anxiety Disorder, dated 11/24/2021. Review of Resident #32's MARs revealed she received Alprazolam 0.25 mg at HS the following months and number of days: 01/2022 - 24 of 31 days. 02/2022 - 28 of 28 days. 03/2022 - 20 of 31 days. 04/2022 - 30 of 30 days. 05/2022 - 22 of 31 days. 06/2022 - 22 of 30 days. 07/2022 - 14 of 18 days. Interview on 07/19/2022 at 1:30 p.m. with S1 DON confirmed Resident #32 received the antianxiety medication, Alprazolam, routinely as above. She also confirmed the prn antianxiety medication, Alprazolam, had not been ordered and evaluated in 14-day cycles to ensure appropriate dosage and duration, and should have been.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Louisiana.
  • • 35% turnover. Below Louisiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 8 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Lasalle's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns LASALLE NURSING HOME an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Lasalle Staffed?

CMS rates LASALLE NURSING HOME's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 35%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Lasalle?

State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at LASALLE NURSING HOME during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 7 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Lasalle?

LASALLE NURSING HOME is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 133 certified beds and approximately 61 residents (about 46% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in JENA, Louisiana.

How Does Lasalle Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, LASALLE NURSING HOME's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (35%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lasalle?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Lasalle Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, LASALLE NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Lasalle Stick Around?

LASALLE NURSING HOME has a staff turnover rate of 35%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Lasalle Ever Fined?

LASALLE NURSING HOME has been fined $7,443 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,153. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Lasalle on Any Federal Watch List?

LASALLE NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.

LASALLE NURSING HOME

139 NINTH STREET, JENA, LA 71342 | (318) 992-6627

B+
Trust Grade (83/100)
5.0
CMS Rating
8
Deficiencies

Strengths

  • 4-star staffing

Concerns

  • Review findings

Ask about: Rn Coverage

nursinghomedata.org | Data: CMS November 2025