KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Kinder Retirement and Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #216 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana places it in the bottom half of the state, and it is the lowest-ranked option in Allen County. The situation is worsening, with the number of issues increasing from 6 in 2024 to 9 in 2025. While staffing is rated average with a 3/5 star score and a 44% turnover rate that is below the state average, the facility has faced serious fines totaling $41,179, which is concerning. Notably, critical incidents include failure to maintain safe water temperatures, resulting in an immediate jeopardy situation, and serious lapses in protecting residents from verbal and sexual abuse, highlighting significant weaknesses in safety and care protocols.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Louisiana
- #216/264
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 44% turnover. Near Louisiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $41,179 in fines. Higher than 53% of Louisiana facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (44%)
4 points below Louisiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Louisiana average (2.4)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Louisiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #60) resident. The total sample siz...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0605
(Tag F0605)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with an order for psychotropic medication were not subjected to chemical restraints for 7 (#9, #12, #13, #24...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all care and services were provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice. The facility failed to document appropriate...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to a resident who requires such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and the co...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure procedures that assure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administration of medications...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: Nurs...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate account of controlled drugs for 2 residents (#5 and #6) of 7 sampled residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that items in the Medication Carts were properly stored by:
1.
Having loose pills in all 3 medication carts.
2.
Failing to remove di...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure responsible party notification was documented in the medical...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing services to assure resident safety and attain or ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed accurate...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines. The facility failed to follow the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared according to the approved recipe by methods, which conserved nutritional value for 7 residents that are se...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL
(L)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was as free of accident hazards as possible, by failing to ensure hot water temperatures were not grea...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment which included the resident's cognitive patterns and mood as required for 1 (Resident #16) of 39 sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0638
(Tag F0638)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a quarterly MDS assessment timely using the quarterly review instrument for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #58) of 39 sampled resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Resident #43
Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admit date of 09/16/2022 with diagnoses that included: Allergic Rhinitis, Bronchitis, Wheezing, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and services in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment and pro...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
3 deficiencies
2 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 residents' (#3 and #5) rights to be free from abuse by faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview the Facility failed to ensure a Resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and persona...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 44% turnover. Below Louisiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), $41,179 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 22 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $41,179 in fines. Higher than 94% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center Staffed?
CMS rates KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 44%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center?
State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 19 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center?
KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 100 certified beds and approximately 71 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in KINDER, Louisiana.
How Does Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (44%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?
KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 44%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?
KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $41,179 across 2 penalty actions. The Louisiana average is $33,491. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Kinder Retirement And Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?
KINDER RETIREMENT AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.