Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not outstanding. It ranks #52 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing it in the top half of nursing homes in the state, and is the best option of the two facilities in Sabine County. The facility is showing improvement, having reduced issues from 6 in 2023 to 3 in 2024, although it still has some serious concerns, including incidents where a resident fell multiple times due to a lack of required supervision and another case of inappropriate contact between residents. Staffing is a weakness, with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and less RN coverage than 94% of state facilities, which raises concerns about the quality of care. Additionally, the facility has accumulated $29,775 in fines, which is average and suggests some compliance issues, but staff turnover is relatively low at 38%, indicating that many staff members remain with the facility.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Louisiana
- #52/264
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 38% turnover. Near Louisiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $29,775 in fines. Higher than 73% of Louisiana facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 7 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (38%)
10 points below Louisiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Louisiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Nurse Practitioner documented a clinical rationale for a denial of a dose reduction for 1 (#56) of 5 (#2, #23, #28, #56, #57) re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure food items were stored in the refrigerator ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure garbage was disposed properly.
Findings:
Review of the non-dated facility policy titled Trash read in part .All waste must be placed i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
5 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent incide...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the residents' status dur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0642
(Tag F0642)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's assessment will be coordinated by and certifi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of pra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure procedures that assure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administration o...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to be free from sexual abuse for 1 (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure a Resident received services with reasonable acc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to ensure the orders for Advance Directives accurately reflected the preference and or choice of the resident or responsible party for 2 (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, by failing to ensure the walls were free of chipping and peeling paint in Room A.
F...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maint...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accident hazards for 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored appropriately...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to: 1)...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 38% turnover. Below Louisiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 16 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $29,775 in fines. Higher than 94% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
About This Facility
What is Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Staffed?
CMS rates Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center during 2022 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center?
Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 116 certified beds and approximately 108 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MANY, Louisiana.
How Does Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Stick Around?
Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Ever Fined?
Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center has been fined $29,775 across 3 penalty actions. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,377. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?
Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.