Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center

965 Fisher Road, MANY, LA 71449 (318) 590-0200
For profit - Limited Liability company 116 Beds RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
60/100
#52 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not outstanding. It ranks #52 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana, placing it in the top half of nursing homes in the state, and is the best option of the two facilities in Sabine County. The facility is showing improvement, having reduced issues from 6 in 2023 to 3 in 2024, although it still has some serious concerns, including incidents where a resident fell multiple times due to a lack of required supervision and another case of inappropriate contact between residents. Staffing is a weakness, with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and less RN coverage than 94% of state facilities, which raises concerns about the quality of care. Additionally, the facility has accumulated $29,775 in fines, which is average and suggests some compliance issues, but staff turnover is relatively low at 38%, indicating that many staff members remain with the facility.

Trust Score
C+
60/100
In Louisiana
#52/264
Top 19%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
6 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
38% turnover. Near Louisiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
○ Average
$29,775 in fines. Higher than 73% of Louisiana facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 7 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 6 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (38%)

    10 points below Louisiana average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 38%

Near Louisiana avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $29,775

Below median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Oct 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Nurse Practitioner documented a clinical rationale for a denial of a dose reduction for 1 (#56) of 5 (#2, #23, #28, #56, #57) re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Nurse Practitioner documented a clinical rationale for a denial of a dose reduction for 1 (#56) of 5 (#2, #23, #28, #56, #57) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure the Nurse Practitioner documented a clinical rationale for not reducing psychoactive medications recommended for gradual dose reduction. Findings: Review of Resident #56's clinical record revealed an admission date of 06/15/2022 with a Re-entry date of 05/25/2023 with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's Disease, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified Dementia Unspecified Severity with Other Behavioral Disturbance, Insomnia, Major Depressive Disorder, Extrapyramidal and Movement Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type Review of Resident #56's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/11/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 99, severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #56's Physician's Orders for October 2024 revealed the following: Trazodone 75mg at Bedtime Seroquel 100mg every morning Seroquel 200mg at Bedtime Risperdal 3mg Twice a Day Buspar 5mg Three times a day Review of the Pharmaceutical Consultant Reports, dated 07/03/2024, revealed the following: Trazodone 75mg at Bedtime, Seroquel 100mg every morning, Seroquel 200mg at Bedtime, Risperdal 3mg Twice a Day, Buspar 5mg Three times a day. The pharmacy consultant requested a dose reduction of the five medications. The nurse practitioner denied a dose reduction but failed to provide a clinical rationale explaining why a dose reduction would be clinically contraindicated. An interview was conducted with S9 DON (Director of Nursing) on 10/09/2024 at 10:45 a.m. S9 DON reviewed Resident #56's Pharmaceutical Consultant Report, dated 07/03/2024, and confirmed a clinical rationale was not provided. S9 DON confirmed the Nurse Practitioner should have written in a clinical rationale as to why a dose reduction was contraindicated and did not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure food items were stored in the refrigerator ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure food items were stored in the refrigerator after opening. Findings: Review of the non-dated facility policy titled Storage: Refrigerator read in part . Keep all perishable foods below 41 degrees F (7 degrees C). Observation of the dry storage area in the kitchen on 10/07/2024 at 8:40 a.m. accompanied by S2 Dietary Manager revealed an open bottle of lemon juice with a hand written date of 09/15/2024, and a non-dated open bottle of teriyaki sauce. Review of the manufacture labels on the lemon juice and teriyaki sauce indicated to Refrigerate after opening. Interview on 10/07/2024 at the time of the observations with S2 Dietary Manager, confirmed that the lemon juice and teriyaki sauce should have been refrigerated after it was opened.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure garbage was disposed properly. Findings: Review of the non-dated facility policy titled Trash read in part .All waste must be placed i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure garbage was disposed properly. Findings: Review of the non-dated facility policy titled Trash read in part .All waste must be placed in sealed containers .All garbage and trash will be placed in a dumpster in a convenient area near the facility . Observation on 10/07/2024 at 8:54 a.m. accompanied by S2 Dietary Manager revealed 5 large trash bags on the ground next to the facility dumpsters. Interview on 10/07/2024 at the time of the observations with S2 Dietary Manager, confirmed that the trash bags should have been placed in the dumpsters and not left on the ground.
Sept 2023 5 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent incide...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent incidents and accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#230) reviewed for accidents. The deficient practice resulted in an actual harm situation for Resident # 230 that began on 10/31/2022 at 10:00 p.m., when Resident #230 was not provided 1:1 supervision on the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift. Resident #230, who was on Fall Precautions, fell 4 times on the day shift on 10/31/2022, and was ordered 1:1 supervision on 10/31/2022 at 12:31 p.m. after the 3rd fall. The CNA who provided care to Resident #230 on the 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift on 10/31/2022, did not provide 1:1 supervision of Resident #230 as ordered, and Resident #230 was found at 11:45 p.m. on the floor in her room on her stomach. Resident #230 was transferred to the emergency room of a local hospital, and diagnosed with an Acute Compression Fracture of T12 and L2 vertebra, Contusions, and a Hematoma to her left eye. Findings: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Shift Report revealed the following in part . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to promote successful transfer of information between nursing staff at shift change in an effort to prevent adverse effects, medication errors and medical mishaps. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 62. Nursing and CNA staff will report relevant information such as change in condition, incidents, etc. at the end of each shift to oncoming shift using a reporting form and/or verbally. Interview on 09/13/2023 at 2:19 p.m. with S2 DON revealed there was no 1:1 Supervision policy. Review of Resident #230's EHR revealed an admit date of 11/01/2021, and a discharge date of 11/06/2022. Resident #230 had the following diagnoses that included: Difficulty in Walking, not elsewhere classified; Alzheimer's disease; Unspecified Lack of Coordination; Unspecified Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility; Generalized Muscle Weakness; and Wasting & Atrophy, not elsewhere classified, unspecified site. Review of Resident #230's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/30/2022 revealed a BIMS of 4 (indicating severe cognitive impairment). The MDS revealed Resident #230 was independent with bed mobility, transfers, walking in room, walking in corridor, locomotion on and off unit, dressing, eating, and toilet use. Resident #230 required supervision with personal hygiene and bathing. Resident #230's balance was not steady, but was able to stabilize without staff assistance. Resident #230 had no impairment to ROM to upper or lower extremities, and used a walker for mobility. Review of Resident #230's Care Plan with a start date of 11/01/2021, revealed in part .Resident #230 was at risk for falls r/t lack of coordination - actual fall x 5 on 10/31/2022. Review of Resident #230's Nursing Notes dated 10/31/2022 at 2:31 a.m., revealed Resident #230 tested positive for COVID 19 during facility outbreak testing, and was moved to a COVID isolation room. Review of an Incident Report dated 10/31/2022 for Resident #230 revealed the following in part . 10:26 a.m. - S7 LPN observed Resident #230 lean down and reach for a snack from the snack cart. Resident #230 then stumbled to floor sitting on butt. On assessment no injuries noted. Resident #230 recently tested positive for COVID with general weakness noted. 11:00 a.m. - CNA notified S7 LPN that Resident #230 continued with unsteadiness of gait. On observation, S7 LPN observed Resident #230 walking into doorway of room a. S7 LPN went to assist and observed Resident #230 stumble to floor sitting on right butt. On assessment, Resident #230 [NAME] without problems, and was assisted to w/c and into room. 12:40 p.m. - Staff observed Resident #230 ambulating from snack cart holding cup of water, with continued increased weakness. Resident #230 spilled water on floor, slipped and fell to floor, and began to stand without assistance. CNA assisted Resident #230 to w/c. 1:1 initiated. No injuries apparent. 1:16 p.m. - CNA reported Resident #230 stood up from w/c while sitting in room. CNA unable to reach Resident #230, and Resident #230 lost balance and slid to the floor, no injuries apparent. CNA assisted Resident #230 to bed after assessment complete. 1:1 continued. 11:45 p.m. - Called to room per S8 CNA. S6 LPN entered Resident #230's room, and observed her lying on her stomach on floor at foot of bed. Rolling walker in upright position at Resident #230's head. Resident #230 alert and verbal. Resident #230 c/o pain to left eyebrow and left side of neck. Resident #230 with marked increased confusion and weakness. Neuro checks WNL. Hematoma approximately 4 cm to left eyebrow. Hematoma approximately 7 cm along left jaw line. Bruising to left side of neck. Abrasion approximately 7 cm to right upper chest/clavicle. Resident #230 assessed. Neuro checks initiated. MD notified. Resident #230 out to ER via ambulance service at 12:15 a.m. on 11/01/2022. Review of Resident #230's undated Fall Time Line revealed the following: 1. Fall #1 - 10:25 a.m. - Happened during ambulation to isolation area, Resident #230 with weakness. Resident #230 was assisted up to and back to isolation room. Resident #230 noted ambulating up and down hallway with rolling walker. 2. Fall #2 - 11:00 a.m. - Resident #230 was ambulating back into room, stumbled and sat on floor. Resident #230 assessed, assisted up to w/c and propelled into isolation room and into bed. 3. Fall #3 - 12:40 p.m. - Resident #230 noted at Hall 1 snack cart, ambulating with cup of water, turned to walk back to her isolation room, she spilled water on the floor and then slipped in water. 1:1 initiated. 4. Fall #4 - Resident #230 1:1 in isolation room, Resident #230 attempted to stand up, 1:1 unable to reach her before she slid to the floor. Continue 1:1 CNA rounds at approximately 10:00 p.m. Resident #230 asleep in bed. 5. No 1:1 6. CNA rounds at 11:40 p.m., Resident #230 noted lying on her stomach at the foot of the bed. Review of Resident #230's 10/2022 Physician Orders included the following orders: 10/31/2022 - PT/OT/ST screen (per 10/31/2022 @ 10:26 a.m. Incident Report) Staff to assist Resident with getting snacks off of cart. 10/31/2022 - PT/OT/ST screen (per 10/31/2022 at 11:00 a.m. incident report). Frequent/Purposeful Staff Rounds. 10/31/2022 - 1:1 initiated (per 10/31/2022 at 12:40 p.m. incident report). PT/OT/ST screen. 10/31/2022 - Remind 1:1 to remain within arm's reach of resident. Review of Resident #230's Transfer/Referral Record dated 11/01/2022 at 12:08 a.m., revealed the resident was transferred to an ED from facility via ambulance. The reason for the transfer was documented as COVID positive, fall at 11:45 p.m. 10/31/2022, Hematoma left eyebrow, left jaw line, abrasion right clavicle/upper chest, marked increased confusion. Review of Resident #230's Hospital CT of Chest dated 11/01/2022, revealed the following in part .Impression: T-12 and L2 upper vertebral bodies with mild acute compression fracture deformities. Partially imaged left lower neck with findings concerning for hematoma, or other mass in the left sternocleidomastoid muscle. Telephone interview with S7 LPN was unsuccessful. Interview with HR on 09/13/2023 at 9:50 a.m. revealed S7 LPN no longer worked at the facility. Telephone interview with S6 LPN was attempted several times on 09/13/2023 by surveyor without success. Interview on 09/13/2023 at 10:32 a.m. with S8 CNA revealed she worked the 10:00 p.m. - 2:00 a.m. shift on October 31, 2022, and found Resident #230 on the floor in her room. S8 CNA stated she was assigned Hall W (hall Resident #230 resided on), and Hall X because 1 CNA worked 2 halls on the night shift. S8 CNA stated she started her shift on Hall X, and then went to Hall W after completion of Hall X. S8 CNA stated she received report from staff prior to starting work, but had not been told that Resident #230 had fallen 4 times earlier in the day, and was not told about Resident #230 being 1:1 supervision. S8 CNA stated she entered Resident #230's room when making rounds, and found Resident #230 on the floor on her stomach. Interview on 09/13/2023 at 11:28 a.m. with S2 DON revealed Resident #230 was ordered 1:1 supervision after falling several times on 10/31/2022. S2 DON confirmed Resident #230 was not on 1:1 supervision at the time of her fall on 10/31/2022 at 11:45 p.m. and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the residents' status dur...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the residents' status during the observation period for 1 (Resident #9) of 1 sampled resident for hospice. Findings: Review of Resident #9's clinical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #9 had diagnoses that included Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, Adult Failure to Thrive, Mild Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and Difficulty Walking. Review of Resident #9's Physician Orders revealed in part . 06/01/2023 Admit to hospice. Review of Resident #9's Significant Change MDS Assessment with an ARD 06/09/2023 indicated Resident #9 was receiving dialysis while a resident. Review of the Assessment did not reveal Resident #9 was receiving hospice services. Review of Resident #9's May 2023 and June 2023 Physician orders revealed no orders for dialysis. Interview on 09/11/2023 at 2:55 p.m. with Resident #9 revealed she was not on dialysis. Interview on 09/12/2023 at 8:40 a.m. S3 LPN revealed she was assigned to Resident #9 and had been working on the hall for 2 months. S3 LPN stated she was not aware of Resident #9 being on dialysis. Interview on 09/12/2023 at 8:52 a.m. with S2 DON revealed Resident #9 was not receiving dialysis services. Interview on 09/12/2023 at 9:40 a.m. with S4 LPN/MDS Coordinator revealed Resident #9 should have been assessed for being on hospice and was not. S4 LPN/MDS Coordinator revealed Resident #9 was coded for dialysis by mistake. S4 LPN/MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #9's 06/09/2023 Significant Change assessment was not accurate and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0642 (Tag F0642)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's assessment will be coordinated by and certifi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's assessment will be coordinated by and certified as complete by a registered nurse for 1 (#64) of 1 resident sampled for MDS record over 120 days old. The facility failed to ensure Resident #64's MDS Correction Request was signed by a registered nurse. Findings: Review of an MDS assessment transmission report revealed Resident #64's 05/05/2023 Significant Change Assessment had been attested on [DATE]. Review of the Resident #64's MDS Correction Request form dated 08/17/2023 revealed a modification had been requested due to an item coding error. Review also revealed the signature box designated as RN Assessment Coordinator Attestation of Completion, had been electronically signed by S4 LPN/MDS Coordinator. Interview on 09/12/2023 at 4:00 p.m. with S2 DON and S4 LPN/MDS Coordinator confirmed the correction request/attestation of completion for Resident #64's Significant Change Assessment with target date 05/05/2023 had not been signed by a registered nurse and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of pra...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #231) of 1 (Resident #231) residents sampled for pain. The facility failed to ensure Resident #231 who displayed verbal and/or nonverbal indicators of pain received the ordered interventions to alleviate severe pain. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Pain Management revealed in part Optimum and effective pain management is only successful through a systematic and total team effort. Continual monitoring, assessment and evaluation, resident education and utilization of scheduled medications and modalities is crucial to the success of each resident's pain management plan. Review of Resident #231's clinical record revealed an admit date of 09/04/2021. Review of the clinical record also revealed Resident #231 had diagnoses that included Dorsalgia, Osteoarthritis, Polyneuropathy, Spinal Stenosis, and Pain. Review of Resident #231's CPOC with a target date of 10/13/2023 revealed in part . Resident #231 has the potential for alteration in comfort related to Diabetic Neuropathy, Generalized Osteoarthritis, Cervical Stenosis, Dorsalgia, Thoracic Spine Pain, Mild Osteopenia, Degenerative Joint Disease, and Enthesophyte formation. Approaches included to administer pain medications as needed, monitor for effectiveness and to administer Percocet as ordered. Interview on 09/11/2023 at 12:44 p.m. with Resident #231 revealed he was not feeling well. Resident #231 stated his back was hurting and grimaced while motioning to his lower back. Resident #231 stated he normally took medication for his back pain every morning but had not taken any this morning because the nurse told him he was out of medicine. Resident #231 stated the nurse had given him Tylenol that morning but the Tylenol did not do much for his pain. Review of Resident #231's September 2023 Physician Orders revealed in part Percocet 5-325mg tablet give one by mouth every 8 hours PRN moderate/severe pain. Order date noted as 02/15/2023. Tylenol 500mg by mouth every 6 hours PRN mild pain. Order date noted as 01/11/2023. Review of Resident #231's September MAR revealed on 09/11/2023 at 11:32 a.m. Resident #231 had received Tylenol 500mg for complaints of pain rated at a 9 out of 10 on the pain scale. Interview on 09/11/2023 at 12:21 p.m. with S3 LPN revealed Resident #231 complained of back pain daily. S3 LPN stated Resident #231 last received Percocet for pain on 09/10/2023 at 11:00 a.m. S3 LPN stated Resident #231 was currently out of prescription pain medications. S3 LPN stated Resident #231's Percocet medication card was empty so she had reordered the medication this morning. S3 LPN stated medication was supposed to be reordered when there are 5 pills remaining. S3 LPN stated Resident #231's Percocet was ordered to be given every 8 hours as needed. S3 LPN confirmed Resident #231 asked for Percocet for his back pain this morning and did not receive it because the medication was not available. S3 LPN stated she had to give Resident #231 Tylenol instead. Review of a nurses' note dated 09/11/2023 at 12:34 p.m. revealed Resident #231 approached S3 LPN with complaints of pain and discomfort in his mid-back. PRN Tylenol had been administered at 11:32 a.m. with little to no relief. S3 LPN notified PCP that a hard script was needed to be sent to the pharmacy for refill. Interview on 09/12/2023 at 9:00 a.m. with S2 DON revealed prescription pain medications required hard scripts from providers and contact should be made with providers within 3 days of the last dose being administered to ensure pain medications do not run out. Review of Resident #231's narcotic log accompanied by S2 DON revealed Resident #231 received Percocet daily. Review of the log revealed Resident #231's count was 3 Percocet tablets remaining on 09/07/2023. Interview on 09/12/2023 at 9:30 a.m. with S2 DON revealed Resident #231's Percocet should have been reordered on 09/07/2023 to ensure Resident #231's pain was effectively managed by having medications available and was not done.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure procedures that assure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administration o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure procedures that assure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administration of medications to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to provide medications and/or biologicals to meet the needs of residents for 1 (Resident #231) of 1 residents sampled. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Orders-Medication revealed in part . Drugs and biologicals that are required to be refilled must be reordered from the issuing pharmacy not less than (3) days prior to the last dosage being administered to ensure that refills are readily available. Interview on 09/11/2023 at 12:44 p.m. with Resident #231 revealed he was not feeling well. Resident #231 stated his back was hurting and grimaced while motioning to his lower back. Resident #231 stated he normally took medication for his back pain every morning but had not taken any this morning because the nurse told him he was out of medicine. Interview on 09/11/2023 at 12:21 p.m. with S3 LPN revealed Resident #231 complained of back pain daily. S3 LPN stated Resident #231 last received pain medications on 09/10/2023 at 11:00 a.m. S3 LPN stated Resident #231 was currently out of prescription pain medications. S3 LPN stated Resident #231's Percocet medication card was empty so she had reordered the medication this morning. S3 LPN stated medication was supposed to be reordered when there are 5 pills remaining. S3 LPN stated Resident #231's Percocet was ordered to be given every 8 hours as needed. S3 LPN confirmed Resident #231 asked for Percocet for his back pain this morning and did not receive it because the medication was not available. Interview on 09/12/2023 at 9:00 a.m. with S2 DON revealed prescription pain medications required hard scripts from providers and contact should be made with providers within 3 days of last dose being administered to ensure medications do not run out. Review of Resident #231's narcotic log accompanied by S2 DON revealed Resident #231 received Percocet daily. Review revealed Resident #231's count was 3 Percocet tablets remaining on 09/07/2023. Review of a facility fax cover sheet revealed a request for a prescription for Percocet 5/325mg had been sent to Resident #231's provider on 09/08/2023 Interview on 09/12/2023 at 9:20 a.m. with S2 DON revealed she had no confirmation the fax had been received by the provider on 09/08/2023. S2 DON stated there was no documentation the request sent on 09/08/2023 had been followed up. Interview on 09/12/2023 at 9:30 a.m. with S2 DON revealed Resident #231's Percocet should have been reordered on 09/07/2023 to ensure availability and was not done.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to be free from sexual abuse for 1 (Residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to be free from sexual abuse for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5) sampled residents. The facility failed to protect Resident #3 from non-consensual, inappropriate sexual contact by Resident #1. This deficient practice resulted in an Actual Harm for Resident #3 that occurred on 02/15/2023, when Resident #3, a cognitively impaired resident, was sitting at the dining room table and Resident #1 was observed with his hand in Resident #3's blouse with her breast exposed. Resident #1 did not remove his hand until staff repeatedly told him to stop. Resident #1, (who had no prior history of inappropriate sexual behavior), was immediately removed from the area and immediately placed on 1:1 supervision, then on in-sight supervision. On 02/15/2023, an appointment was scheduled for Resident #3 to receive counseling as an intervention due to the sexual abuse on 02/15/2023. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's Investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of facility policy titled Abuse/Neglect Policy Statement revealed in part . it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed an admit date of 04/27/2022 with diagnoses that included in part .Cerebral Vascular Accident, Anxiety Disorder, Depressive Disorder and Multiple Sclerosis. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS Assessment with an ARD of 03/01/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 9 (moderately cognitive impairment). Resident #3 required extensive assistance of 2 persons with toileting, bed mobility, transfers, and required to be fed by staff. Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Plan of Care with a goal date of 05/31/2023 read as follows in part .Resident #3 was diagnosed with Anxiety Disorder on 04/27/2020. On 02/25/2023, Resident #3's plan of care was updated to include a problem of at risk for altered mood after Resident #3 was inappropriately touched by another resident. Approaches included: observe for mental status change and report to the Physician; Social Service to evaluate and visit resident quarterly; approach the resident warmly and positively. On 02/15/2023 an appointment for counseling was scheduled and staff are to monitor resident for changes in mood and allow resident to express self, an assure resident that she is safe. Review of a facility incident report documented by S2 DON revealed that on 02/15/2023 at 7:12 a.m., Resident #1 was observed by staff inappropriately touching Resident #3 without her consent. Both residents were in the dining room during meal service. As soon as the action was observed Resident #1 and Resident #3 were separated. Resident #1 was taken to his room and was placed on 1:1 supervision. Resident #3 was allowed to finish her meal in the dining room. The Medical Director, Family/RP and Police were contacted and a report was taken. Observation on 03/20/2023 at 10:29 a.m. revealed Resident #3 sitting up in her wheelchair in the dining room with her back turned to all residents at a table to be fed. Interview with Resident #3 on 03/20/2023 at that time revealed Resident #3's speech was slow with delayed thought process, a flat affect was noted to her facial expression. When asked how she was feeling, Resident #3 responded with jumbled wording. When asked yes or no questions Resident #3 responded with a yes or no nod of the head. Resident #3 responded with a yes nod when asked if she had been sexually inappropriately touched by Resident #1. When asked again if she had been sexually touched inappropriately by Resident #1, Resident #3 responded by shaking her head no. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/26/2022, and diagnoses that included in part .Major Depressive Disorder, DM 2, and PVD. Resident #1's medical record revealed there was no history or warning signs of inappropriate sexual behavior. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/03/2023, revealed in part . BIMS Score of 9 (moderate cognitive impairment), and Functional Status that included in part . Transfers - limited one person physical assistance; Locomotion on and off the unit - independent with no physical assistance required; ROM impairment on one side for upper and lower extremities, and wheelchair use for mobility. Interview with Resident #1 on 03/20/2023 at 10:35 a.m. revealed he did remember the incident where he inappropriately touched Resident #3, but stated I'm cured, because they sent me out of here to a psych facility and they cured me. Resident #1 stated he should have never gone to that dining table where she was at. In a telephone interview with S7 LPN on 03/22/2023 at 10:34 a.m., she revealed she was the nurse responsible for lunch and dinner monitoring of the residents. S7 LPN revealed while in the dining room on 02/15/2023, S8 CNA alerted her that Resident #1 was being inappropriate with Resident #3. S7 LPN stated that she and S8 CNA immediately walked toward Resident #1, telling him to stop, but Resident #1 did not stop until they reached him and separated him from Resident #3. S7 LPN stated she stayed with Resident #3 while staff escorted Resident #1 to his room. S7 LPN revealed Resident #1 was not crying, but she could tell by her facial expressions she was upset. S7 LPN stated the staff tried to comfort Resident #3 and make sure she knew she was safe. In a telephone interview with S8 CNA on 03/22/2023 at 12:45 p.m., S8 CNA revealed she worked on 02/15/2023 when Resident #1 inappropriately touched Resident #3. S8 CNA revealed she was passing out trays in the dining room when she turned around from picking up a tray at the window and saw Resident #1 with his hand under Resident #3's blouse. S8 CNA stated she alerted S7 LPN as she (S8 CNA) was walking towards Resident #1 and Resident #3. S8 CNA stated Resident #1 would not respond to their verbal commands to stop, and she and S7 LPN had to back Resident #1 away (in his wheelchair) from Resident #3. S8 CNA stated they immediately separated them and S7 LPN told another CNA to take Resident #1 to his room. S8 CNA stated she and S7 LPN checked on Resident #3 to make sure she was okay. S8 CNA stated Resident #3 never showed any expression other that she closed her eyes when it occurred. S8 CNA stated Resident #1 was immediately placed 1:1. Interview with S2 DON on 03/20/203 at 10:45 a.m. revealed Resident #1 after returning from the behavioral hospital on [DATE], was placed on in line of sight supervision when in public. S2 DON revealed there had been no further issues with Resident #1 being inappropriate with another resident since his return. S2 DON revealed that they were in the process of decreasing Resident #1's supervision since he had not had any further issues after his behavioral hospital stay. S2 DON revealed that when Resident #1 was not in his room, it was the entire staff's responsibility to ensure Resident #1 was not inappropriate with any other resident. S2 DON stated Resident #1's floor nurse and CNA were responsible for documenting Resident #1's supervision. Interview with S4 CNA on 03/20/2023 at 11:10 a.m. revealed she documented in Resident #1's medical record multiple times a day her observations that Resident #1 was within line of sight. S4 CNA revealed she observed Resident #1 on 02/24/2023 attempting to go into another female resident's room, while the female resident was on the toilet. S4 CNA revealed she blocked his attempt and immediately told him to get down the hall. S4 CNA revealed she then reported it to the nurse. Interview with S5 LPN on 03/20/2023 at 11:20 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was her resident, and she was responsible for making sure he was in line of sight at all times, encourage him to stay in his room, and remind the CNAs to keep an eye on him. S5 LPN revealed she was responsible for documenting in Resident #1's medical record that he was observed being in line of sight when out of his room. Interview with S6 Restorative CNA on 03/20/2023 at 11:50 a.m. revealed she had received an in-service on abuse after the incident with Resident #1 and Resident #3 on 02/15/2023). S6 Restorative CNA revealed she was aware she was to monitor to ensure that Resident #1 did not go around other female residents. Interview with the Psych NP on 03/20/2023 at 11:57 a.m. revealed he was scheduled to see Resident #1 on 02/16/2023 about the incident that occurred on 02/15/2023. The Psych NP stated he evaluated Resident #1 and did not make any recommendations other than what the facility staff were already doing by having him 1:1 supervision. The Psych NP stated he was scheduled to see Resident #1 the following week after the incident when he came as scheduled. The Psych NP revealed Resident #1 was out of the facility at an appointment last week when he came to see him. Review of the Discharge Transition orders from the behavioral facility dated 03/07/2023 revealed medication changes had been made, and Resident #1 was in stable condition. There were no supervision orders noted on the Discharge orders. Review of the verbal written discharge orders dated 03/07/2023 by S3 ADON revealed a verbal order had been written for Resident #1 to remain in line of sight when in public after Resident #1's return to the facility from the behavioral hospital. Interview with S3 ADON on 03/20/2023 at 1:40 p.m. revealed some of the orders she transcribed were written on the hospital discharge sheet, but she had contacted the behavioral hospital and spoke with a staff person, who was not the Physician, and resumed all previous orders as directed by the staff person. S3 ADON revealed she should have not written the order to continue line of sight supervision when in public, because she had not received the order from the Physician. Interview with the Behavioral Hospital's Psychiatrist on 03/21/2023 at 11:13 a.m. revealed he was the Psychiatrist who treated Resident #1 during his hospital stay on 02/15/2023 - 03/07/2023. The Psychiatrist stated he had made some medication changes for Resident #1. The Psychiatrist stated upon Resident #1's discharge, Resident #1 was in stable condition and able to return to his home. The Psychiatrist was asked if he discharged Resident #1 back to the nursing home on 1:1 supervision or in line of sight supervision, and he stated absolutely not. If Resident #1 had required that much supervision he would have kept him at the hospital until he was more stable. The Psychiatrist stated Resident #1 did not require 1:1 supervision, or in line of sight supervision when he (Resident #1) was discharged back to the nursing facility. The facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: Resident #1 was immediately put on 1:1, in-services were done and staff were educated on abuse. Multiple attempts to admit Resident #1 to a behavioral hospital were unsuccessful due to the resident having a wound. A list of facilities were included. In-services initiated immediately after the incident on 02/15/2023 and continued until all staff were educated. Education was continued with the Attorney General's office on abuse presenting an in-service on 03/07/2023 on abuse. The facility will continue to educate/in-service all staff on abuse and neglect. The next in-service on abuse/neglect will be held in April. 2023. Training and retraining of all staff included: Objective: to ensure the safety of all resident are free from abuse. Initial training session was done 02/15/2023 at 12:00 noon and lasted approximately 30 minutes. Other staff were in-serviced individually, per department head nurse/administration/DON as needed. Abuse policy and procedure were reviewed, no changes were made at the time of the review. Resident #1 was sent to a behavioral hospital on [DATE] and returned on 03/07/2023, with new order for Risperidone 0.5mg p.o. QHS. No other orders for were made for 1:1 or in line of sight from behavioral hospital at discharge. No inappropriate behavior has been noted from Resident #1 since his return from the behavioral hospital. QAA Evaluation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation reports: For all reports of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation, the QAA committee will complete the following: Was a thorough investigation conducted? Yes. All interviewable residents were interviewed to see if they had seen or had any appropriate behaviors done to them. Body assessments were performed on resident that were not cognitively aware, for signs and symptoms of abuse. Were other resident's protected? How? Yes. Resident #1 was placed 1:1 immediately after the incident on 02/15/2023 and monitoring was continued as ordered. All residents were immediately protect after this incident. Was an analysis conducted as to why the situation occurred? Explain: Yes, this was an isolated incident for Resident #1, who had no known history or warning signs of inappropriate behavior. Risk factor that contributed to the abuse: No known history of inappropriate sexual behavior had been exhibited by Resident #1 since his admission on [DATE]. Isolated incident - addressed immediately Overall Goal: no inappropriate sexual behavior/abuse Identified Factor/Issue: Male resident inappropriately touched a female resident's breast Project Team Members: All Staff Plan: types of monitoring done - in-serviced staff on abuse policy, routine monitoring inappropriate behavior. Resident #1 was placed 1:1, then line of sight, daily smart chart review (supervision) of monitoring per DON/ADON, daily hall rounds per department head nurse, monitoring of daily rounds/round sheets per ADM/AIT. Plan for Monitoring/Completion Date: Monitor for any inappropriate behaviors and ensure that staff were following the plan of care on daily rounds. If any concerns, implement new interventions. Monitoring was initiated immediately after the incident on (02/15/2023) and continued until D/C order was received from the MD. No issues were found in the monitoring process. Will continue to re-educate staff on abuse. Line of sight was discontinued on 03/20/2023 related to clarification received from MD that the line of sight should not have continued upon re-admit to the NH on 03/07/2023. Today (03/21/2023), we began Q shift monitoring by LPN and Q2H monitoring per CNA and any sign or symptoms of inappropriate behavior, the DON/ADON will daily check smart chart review (supervision) for monitoring. QA team will meet in 2 weeks to review/change current plan. The Behavioral Hospital representative stated if line of sight or 1:1 was recommended, it would have been listed on the transition record. There were none of these recommendations made upon discharge. The line of sight order from 03/07/2023 was transcribed in error, clarification with the physician supports this was not ordered or needed after behavioral hospital stay. Expected Behaviors: No more sexually inappropriate behaviors have been displayed from Resident #1. QA committee will meet in April of 2023 to review/evaluate the plan of action related to this incident. Facility correction date 03/07/2023.
Sept 2022 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure a Resident received services with reasonable acc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure a Resident received services with reasonable accommodation of Resident needs for 1 (Resident #16) of 1 sampled Resident reviewed for call light availability. Findings: Observation on 09/12/2022 at 12:30 p.m. revealed Resident #16 sitting in her wheelchair in her room. She was neat and well-groomed. The Resident's room was suite-like. She had a bedroom that was separate from the living room. She stated last weekend she fell in her living room and had to scoot on her bottom across the floor to her bedroom to use a call light to get help. She confirmed she did not have a call light or a telephone in her living room to call staff if needed. Observation on 09/13/2022 at 8:56 a.m. revealed Resident #16 sitting in her wheelchair in her bathroom. She stated she had just finished her shower. There was a call light in the bathroom and the bedroom, but not in the living room. Resident #16 stated again that she had no way to call for help from the living room. Review of the Facility Call Light: Accessibility and Timely Response Policy revealed in part . With each interaction in the resident's room or bathroom, staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. Review of Resident #16's EHR revealed an admit date of 06/02/2022 with the following diagnoses including: history of falling ;muscle wasting and atrophy; unilateral primary osteoarthritis, right knee; other lack of coordination; difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified; generalized muscle weakness; and repeated falls. Review of Resident #16's 09/2022 MD Orders revealed the following including: 06/02/2022 - Fall precautions Review of Resident #16's Care Plan with a Target Date of 09/30/2022 revealed the following in part: The Resident is at risk for injury r/t drug interaction r/t polypharmacy with an intervention of if s/s of drug interactions are noted: confusion, weakness, falls, lethargy, etc .Notify MD; The Resident is at risk for falls, h/o falls, weakness with a goal of falls will not occur with interventions including: remind to ask staff for assistance with ambulation, Resident instructed to not dust lower part of TV stand, Resident reminded to call for assist with all transfers, frequent purposeful staff rounds. Review of Resident #16's Annual MDS with ARD of 06/08/2022 revealed the following including: Section C - Cognitive Patterns - The Resident had a BIMS of 9 (indicating cognition is moderately impaired). Section J - Health Conditions - The Resident had falls before admission. Review of Resident #16's 06/2022 - 09/2022 Progress Notes revealed the Resident was admitted to the Facility under skilled care. Resident #16 had repeated falls at home. Review of the Facility Incident Log revealed Resident #16 had falls on 08/14/2022 and 09/10/2022. Both falls occurred in her room. Interview on 09/13/2022 at 1:33 p.m. with S2 DON confirmed Resident #16 fell on [DATE] and 09/10/2022. She stated Resident #16 was dusting her TV stand when she fell out of her wheelchair on 08/14/2022. S2 DON stated Resident #16 was reminded that staff would provide dusting in her room. She further revealed that on 09/10/2022 staff round frequency was increased on Resident #16 after her second fall. S2 DON confirmed there was not a call light available for the Resident to use in her living room. S2 DON confirmed Resident #16 should have a way to call for assistance from her living room and was at risk because she did not have a call light available for use.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to ensure the orders for Advance Directives accurately reflected the preference and or choice of the resident or responsible party for 2 (Resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to ensure the orders for Advance Directives accurately reflected the preference and or choice of the resident or responsible party for 2 (Resident #9 and #59) of 2 (#9 and #59) sampled residents reviewed for Advance Directives. Findings: Review of the Facility's Advance Directives policy revealed in part . Any decision making will be documented in the resident's medical record and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Resident #9 Observation on 09/12/2022 at 3:00 p.m. of Resident #9's medical chart revealed a red DNR sticker on the spine of Volume 1. Further observation of Resident #9's medical chart revealed no DNR label on the outside of Volume 2 of the Resident's medical chart. Review of Resident #9's Advance Directive dated 03/10/2021 revealed Resident had not executed an Advance Directive. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed a Physician's order slip dated 08/24/2022 for DNR per resident request. Review of Resident #9's Face sheet revealed an admission date of 03/10/2021 and a readmission date of 07/17/2021 with diagnoses which included: Urinary Retention, Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy, Bladder Disorder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer, Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, Acquired Absence of Left Leg Below Knee, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Renal Mass/Cyst. Further review of the Face sheet revealed no information on Resident's Advance Directives or Code Status. Review of Resident #9's Quarterly MDS with ARD 08/24/2022 revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicative of intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #9 did not have an Advance Directives or a LAPOST. Review of Resident #9's Care Plan with a target date of 11/24/2022 revealed Resident #9 with Urinary Retention at risk for secondary disease process due to diagnosis 07/06/2022 Renal Mass/ Cyst with goal of Advance Directives will be followed as specified DNR with start date of 08/22/2022. Interview on 09/12/22 at 03:05 p.m. with S12 SSW stated the Resident's Advance Directives and Code Status can be found on the residents Face sheet in the chart. S12 SSW presented this surveyor with the Resident #9's Face sheet and the Physician's Orders for 08/2022 and verified the Code Status was not noted on the residents Face sheet nor on the 08/2022 Physician's Orders and should have been. S12 SSW revealed Resident #9 had changed his Code Status on 08/22/2022 and the changes had not been updated on his record and should have been. Interview on 09/14/2022 at 8:00 a.m. with S2 DON confirmed Resident #9's Code Status information on the face sheet in the medical record should have been updated to reflect Resident #9's Code status preference wishes made on 08/22/2022 and was not done. Resident #59 Observation on 09/12/2022 at 3:00 p.m. of Resident #59 medical chart revealed a red DNR sticker on the spine of Volume 1 medical chart. Further observation of Resident #59's Volume 2 revealed no DNR label on the outside of the medical chart. Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed a signed undated Full Code status form noted on chart. Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an Advance Directive dated 09/02/2020 which indicated the Resident had not executed an Advance Directives. Further review of Resident #59's medical record with a LAPOST dated 08/05/2022 revealed a DNR Code Status with comfort focused treatment and no artificial nutrition by tube. Review of Resident #59's Face sheet revealed an admission date of 09/02/2020 with diagnoses which included: Dementia with behavioral disturbances, Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy with UTI, Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Altered Mental Status, Acute Kidney Failure, Essential Primary Hypertension, Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Hypertensive Heart Disease. Further review of the Face sheet revealed no information on Resident's Advance Directives or Code Status. Review of Resident #59's Physician's Orders dated 08/2022 revealed an order on 08/05/2022 to Admit to Superior Hospice with an admitting diagnosis of Dementia with Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #59's Significant Change MDS with ARD 08/08/2022 revealed a BIMS score of 99 indicating Resident was unable to complete a BIMS. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #59 did not have an Advance Directive and had completed a LAPOST. Review of Resident #59's Care Plan with a target date of 11/07/2022 revealed Resident is a Full Code dated 08/05/2022. Further review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #59's Advance Directive will be followed as specified on 08/05/2022 - DNR with a start date of 09/04/2020. Interview on 09/12/2022 at 03:05 p.m. with S12 SSW stated Resident's Advance Directives and Code Status can be found on the Resident's Face sheet in the chart. S12 SSW presented this surveyor with the Resident #59's Face sheet and Physician's Orders for 08/2022 and verified the Code Status was not noted on the Resident's Face sheet and should have been. S12 SSW further stated the Resident #59's RP had changed the code status on 08/05/2022 and that the changes had not been updated on the Resident's record and should have been. Interview on 09/13/2022 at 4:10 p.m. with S10 LPN stated she usually works the 3 p.m. -11 p.m. evening shifts. S10 LPN stated the Resident's Code Status should be located on the outside of the chart, on the face sheet, and as a FYI noted on the residents Physician's orders. S10 LPN further revealed the signed Full Code Status form should not have been on the Resident #59's medical record. Interview on 09/14/2022 at 8:00 a.m. with S2 DON confirmed Resident #59 had a signed Full Code Status form noted on medical record and should have been removed when Resident's Code Status changed to a DNR status and LAPOST signed on 08/05/2022. S2 DON further confirmed Resident's Code Status information was not on the Face sheet on the medical record should have been updated to reflect the Resident's RP wishes made on 08/05/2022 and was not done. Interview on 09/14/2022 at 1:15 p.m. with S11 LPN MDS verified Resident #59's Care Plan revealed Resident #59 is a Full Code. S11 LPN MDS confirmed Resident #59's Code Status on his care plan should have been updated to reflect the wishes of the resident's RP as indicated on his LAPOST dated 08/05/2022 and was not done.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, by failing to ensure the walls were free of chipping and peeling paint in Room A. F...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, by failing to ensure the walls were free of chipping and peeling paint in Room A. Findings: Observation of Room A on 09/12/2022 at 2:15 p.m., revealed Resident #69 lying in bed with her bed flushed against the wall. The wall was noted to have a large amount of paint peeling and chipping off of the wall. Interview on 09/13/2022 at 10:01 a.m. with S2 DON confirmed the paint was peeling off of the wall and the walls need to be painted in Room A.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maint...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility failed to provide nail care to dependent residents for 3 (Resident #19, #45 and #69) of 27 sampled Residents. Findings: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Nail Care read in part: Policy- The purpose of .is to provide guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: Routine cleaning and inspections of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis. Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided by nurse on a regular schedule per care plan unless contraindicated. #19 Review of Resident #19's MDS Quarterly Assessment with an ARD of 08/29/2022 revealed the Resident's BIMS was blank and the Resident was coded for being severely impaired-never/rarely made decisions. Resident #19's functional status revealed she required 2 persons physical assistance with transferring, shower/bathing, toileting and dressing. Review of Resident #19's Care Plan revealed the Resident was severely impaired physically with right side Hemiplegia and required extensive to dependent assist with ADLs x 2 persons. Observation on 09/12/2022 at 1:30 p.m. revealed Resident #19 lying in bed fully dressed. Resident #19's fingernails were noted to be 1/2 inch in length, jagged with dark substances under the nailbeds. Observation on 09/13/2022 at 9:37 a.m. of Resident #19 accompanied by S2 DON confirmed that Resident #19's fingernails were long, jagged and needed to be trimmed. S2 DON stated that the CNAs and Nurses were responsible for nail care during routine care such as bathing and body audits. #45 Review of Resident #45's MDS Quarterly Assessment with an ARD of 07/18/2022 revealed Resident #45 had a BIMS of 13 (cognitively intact), and required 2 persons physical assistance with transferring, shower/bathing, toileting and dressing. Review of Resident #45's Care Plan revealed Resident #45 required assistance with ADLs, and staff were to assist as needed. Observation on 09/12/2022 at 12:10 p.m. of Resident #45 revealed the Resident sitting in the dining room after eating lunch. Resident #45 fingernails were noted be long, untrimmed, with black substances underneath the nailbeds. Interview on 09/12/2022 at 12:15 p.m. with Resident #45 revealed his fingernails were too long, dirty and he would like to have his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. Observation on 09/13/22 at 10:11a.m.of Resident #45 sitting in the front lobby listening to music. Resident #45's fingernails remained long and dirty. Interview on 09/13/2022 at 10:15 a.m. with S2 DON after inspecting Resident #45's nails confirmed that Resident #45 fingernails needed to be cleaned and trimmed. #69 Review of Resident #69's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/10/2022 revealed that Resident #69 has a BIMS of 9 (moderately impaired) and required one person physical assist with bathing and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #69's Care Plan revealed Resident #69 requires assist with ADLs, with fingernails checked and cleaned daily by the CNA. Observation on 09/12/2022 at 2:15 p.m. of Resident #69 revealed the Resident lying in bed dressed in flowered gown. Resident #69's fingernails were noted to be long, untrimmed with black substance underneath the nailbeds and her toenails were long thick and untrimmed. Interview with Resident #69 on 09/12/2022 at the time of the observation revealed her fingernails and toenails needed to be trimmed. Observation on 09/13/2022 at 9:49 a.m. of Resident #69 lying in bed fully dressed. Resident #69's fingernails remained long, dirty and untrimmed and her toenails remained long, thick and untrimmed. Observation on 09/13/2022 at 9:55 a.m. of Resident #69 accompanied by S2 DON confirmed that Resident #69 fingernails needed to be cleaned and trimmed and her toenails needed to be trimmed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accident hazards for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accident hazards for 1 (#57) of 2 (#57, #66) residents reviewed for accidents by failing to use a two-person transfer with the mechanical lift, as outlined in the resident's care plan. Findings: Resident #57 Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an admit date of 08/04/2016 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Edema, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #57's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident was totally dependent with transferring and required two person physical assist with transferring. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #57 was care planned for assistance with activities of daily living with interventions that included a two person assist with transfers with use of the mechanical lift. In an observation at 9:00 a.m. on 09/14/2022, S5 CNA was observed lifting Resident #57 from the bed with the mechanical lift alone and without any assistance from another staff member. No other staff members were observed in the resident's room. In an observation at 9:05 a.m. on 09/14/2022 with S3 RN Treatment Nurse, Resident #57 was observed sitting in her recliner on a blue lift pad. S5 CNA was still in the resident's room with the mechanical lift. In an interview at that time, S5 CNA confirmed she had just transferred Resident #57 to her recliner using the mechanical lift alone and without the assistance of a second person. S5 CNA further confirmed she was trained to use the mechanical lift with two persons but was just trying to get it done. At that time, S3 RN Treatment Nurse confirmed S5 CNA had transferred Resident #57 with the mechanical lift without the assistance of a second staff member and should not have. In an interview at 9:07 a.m. on 09/14/2022, S2 DON was notified S5 CNA had been observed transferring Resident #57 alone with the mechanical lift from the bed to the recliner. S2 DON acknowledged S5 CNA should not have transferred the resident alone and without a second person assisting her when using the mechanical lift.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored appropriately...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored appropriately based on current acceptable professional principles. Findings: Observation on [DATE] at 8:15 a.m. of Med Cart B accompanied by S9 LPN revealed one undated open stock bottle of adult low dose aspirin 81mg tablets Lot#911V03 with an expiration date of 11/2023. Interview at the time of observation with S9 LPN revealed she did not know when the stock bottle of baby aspirin was opened. Observation on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. of the locked refrigerator in Med room B accompanied by S7 LPN revealed two boxes of [NAME] Acetaminophen 650mg suppositories (48 suppositories in each box) Lot # 8LT0315 with an expiration date of 10/2021. Interview at the time of observation with S7 LPN verified two boxes of acetaminophen suppositories were expired and should have been discarded. Observation on [DATE] at 9:10 a.m. of Med Cart C accompanied by S7 LPN revealed one undated open stock bottle of Acetaminophen 500mg tablets Lot#201V07 with an expiration date of 11/2023 and one undated open stock bottle of Folic Acid 1mg tablets Lot#HC101208 with an expiration date of 3/2023. Interview at the time of observation with S7 LPN revealed she was unaware when the stock bottles were opened. Observation on [DATE] at 9:15 a.m. of the locked refrigerator in Med Room A accompanied by S7 LPN revealed one opened vial of Tubersol 5 units/0.1 ml multi-dose vial Lot #C5994AA expiration date [DATE] with no date when the vial was opened. Interview at the time of observation with S7 LPN verified the vial was open and undated and stated she did not know when the seal was broken. Observation on [DATE] at 9:25 a.m. of Med Cart A accompanied by S8 LPN revealed the following open undated stock bottles available for use: Multivitamin tablets Lot #501V06 expiration date 3/2024. Aspirin adult low dose 81mg tablets Lot #981V01 exp. date 10/2023. Naproxen Sodium 220mg caplets Lot #951T01 exp. date 1/2023. Magnesium Oxide 400mg tablets Lot #634T16 exp. date 7/2023. Ibuprofen 200mg tablets Lot #941V03 exp. date 10/2023. Docusate Sodium 100mg soft gels Lot #401V07 exp. date 9/2023. Docusate Sodium 100mg tablets Lot #421V08 exp. date 11/2023. Major Acetaminophen PM 500mg/25mg caplets Lot #133363 exp. date 12/2024. Interview at the time of observation with S8 LPN verified the above stock bottles were not dated as to when opened and confirmed that the stock bottles should have been. Interview on [DATE] at 9:40 a.m. with S6 ADON in Med Room B confirmed two boxes acetaminophen suppositories 650mg Lot # 8LT0315 were expired (expiration date of 10/2021). S6 ADON confirmed the suppositories should have been discarded and not available for resident use. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:50 a.m. with S6 ADON accompanied with S7 LPN confirmed the opened undated stock bottles of acetaminophen 500mg tablets and folic acid 1mg tablets on Med Cart B should have been labeled with the date when opened. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:55 a.m. with S6 ADON accompanied with S8 LPN confirmed the opened undated stock bottles listed above on Med Cart A and confirmed they should have been labeled with the date when opened. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:00 a.m. with S6 ADON in Med Room A accompanied with S8 LPN confirmed the open undated Tubersol multidose vial and confirmed it should have been labeled with the date that the seal was broken on the vial.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to: 1)...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to: 1) store dishes and utensils under sanitary conditions and 2) ensure food preparation equipment was clean. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 72 Residents that received meals prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Ice Pass, Water Pitchers & Ice Machines read in part: Ice Machines must be emptied and cleaned according to the manufacture's instruction at least monthly. Observation of the kitchen on 09/12/2022 at 9:51 a.m. revealed: 1. A 32 quart pot stored under storage counter was stored with dried yellow substance on the inside of the pot. 2. 32 clean 9 ounces serving bowls were stored on 3 tier stainless steel table, were stacked on top of each other, and were noted to be wet with water dripping. 3. Serving utensils (food scoops, food strainers, spatulas, and fork) were stored in a drawer lined with wrinkled aluminum foil which was noted to be greasy with yellow and brown gel like substances on the foil, and dark flaky substance in the bottom of the drawer. 4. Four 9 inch serving pans stored on top of a 3 tier rolling stainless steel cart were noted to have dried white, brown and/or yellow food particles stuck on the side, bottom, and/or around the rim of the outside of the pans. 5. Rubber gaskets of the ice machine were noted to have dark black substance in between the grooves. 6. Refrigerator rubber gaskets on the juices and milk refrigerator were noted to have dark black substance in between the grooves. Interview with S4 Dietary Manager on 09/10/2022 at 10:45 a.m. confirmed all of the above findings at the time during the observations. S4 Dietary Manager stated that each dietary worker who was assigned to washing the dishes was responsible for ensuring that all of the cooking and eating utensils are stored washed/dried and stored properly. S4 Dietary Manager further confirmed that she had no cleaning policy which addressed cleaning and storage of cooking and eating utensils.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 38% turnover. Below Louisiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 16 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $29,775 in fines. Higher than 94% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 60/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Staffed?

CMS rates Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center?

State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center during 2022 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center?

Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 116 certified beds and approximately 108 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MANY, Louisiana.

How Does Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.

Is Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Stick Around?

Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center Ever Fined?

Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center has been fined $29,775 across 3 penalty actions. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,377. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Sabine Retirement And Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?

Sabine Retirement and Rehab Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.