PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Patterson Healthcare Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its operations and care quality. Ranking #234 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana places it in the bottom half, and it is the least favorable option in St. Mary County. Although the facility shows a trend of improvement, decreasing issues from 27 to 3 over the last year, it still faces serious staffing challenges, reflected in a 2 out of 5 star rating for staffing. There is a concerning history of incidents, such as a severely cognitively impaired resident eloping from the facility unnoticed, which highlights a lack of adequate supervision. Additionally, the facility has accumulated $17,280 in fines, suggesting compliance problems. However, it is worth noting that the staff turnover is relatively low at 30%, which is better than the state average, and the RN coverage is average, meaning there is some level of consistent care.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Louisiana
- #234/264
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 30% turnover. Near Louisiana's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $17,280 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 10 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 33 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (30%)
18 points below Louisiana average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Louisiana average (2.4)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
15pts below Louisiana avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 33 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
MINOR
(B)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for residents' activities of daily living (ADL) for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0800
(Tag F0800)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a diet to meet a resident's needs for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 (Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents observ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information at the beginning of each shift daily as required.
Findings:
Observation on 05/06/2025 at 10:45PM revealed th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
14 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of a medication for 1 (Resident #25) of 2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure shower rooms were maintained in a safe and sanitary manner for 2 (shower room y and shower room z) of 3 shower roo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement recommendations from the Office of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based observations, interviews, record reviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was involved in the development an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide nail care to a dependent resident for 1 (Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy it was determined that the facility failed to develop a plan of care for 1 (Resident #287) of 1 residents investigated for oxygen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure only licensed personnel administered medications for 1 (Resident #25) of 27 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, it was facility determined the facility failed to ensure the following:
1. An insulin pen wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the facility's lunch menu and ensure the substitution to the menu w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by:
1. not performing hand hygiene while administering med...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a functional call bell system was available for 1 (Resident #18) of 32 sampled residents.
Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor for the effectiveness and potentia...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to:
1. Ensure the facility's hood fan was kept clean and sanitary;
2. Ensure the facility's double fryer was kept clea...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the required state survey agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident of staff to resident physical abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 (Resident #1, Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility the facility failed to ensure residents identified as safe smokers maintained their rights to smoke at their leisure for 4 (Resident#1, Resident #2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure grievances was addressed and acted upon promptly per the facility's Grievance procedure for The Resident Council Meeting for 3(08/...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0553
(Tag F0553)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a plan of care meeting for 1 (Resident #433) of 19 (Resident #28, Resident #19, Resident #24, Resident #2, Resident #29, Resident #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications for 1 (Resident #58) of 19 (Resident #28, Resident #19, Resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's clinical record contained a completed Advance Directive for 1 (Resident #183) of 2 (Resident #24 and Resident #183) sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an identified mental health diagnosis was re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to act on two pharmacist's irregularities sent to the attending physician for 1 (Resident #19) of 5 sampled residents (Resident #13, Resident #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene while passing ice. This deficient practice was observed for 1 (S4Certified Nursing Assistant) of 2 (S4Cer...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility failed to develop and implement a resident's plan of care.
Resident #133
Accidents
Resident # 133 was admitted to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to:
1. Ensure a resident's enteral feeding was being administered per physician's orders (Resident #76);
2. Document the admi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to:
1. Ensure dented cans in the dry storage room were disposed of and not readily available for use;
2. Ensure cooking and serving items (ov...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure staff increased su...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently by failing t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from roaches. The deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 85 residents who re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 30% turnover. Below Louisiana's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 33 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $17,280 in fines. Above average for Louisiana. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade F (14/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Patterson Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Patterson Healthcare Center Staffed?
CMS rates PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 30%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Patterson Healthcare Center?
State health inspectors documented 33 deficiencies at PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 29 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Patterson Healthcare Center?
PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NEXION HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 121 certified beds and approximately 82 residents (about 68% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in PATTERSON, Louisiana.
How Does Patterson Healthcare Center Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (30%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Patterson Healthcare Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Patterson Healthcare Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Patterson Healthcare Center Stick Around?
PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 30%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Patterson Healthcare Center Ever Fined?
PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $17,280 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,252. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Patterson Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?
PATTERSON HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.