LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK

8275 HIGHWAY 165, POLLOCK, LA 71467 (318) 765-3557
For profit - Limited Liability company 103 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
14/100
#219 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Pollock has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its care quality. Ranking #219 out of 264 facilities in Louisiana places it in the bottom half, and it is the second of only two options in Grant County, meaning families have limited choices. Although the facility has shown improvement in reducing issues from 10 in 2024 to 5 in 2025, it still faces serious challenges. Staffing is rated below average with a 52% turnover rate, which can disrupt resident care. In terms of specific incidents, the facility failed to ensure proper supervision for residents at risk of elopement, leading to a critical situation where a resident with dementia exited the facility unnoticed and was found near a busy highway. Additionally, another resident did not receive the necessary one-on-one observation as required, which could impact their well-being. Overall, while there are some signs of progress, families should weigh these serious deficiencies against the available strengths when considering this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
14/100
In Louisiana
#219/264
Bottom 18%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
10 → 5 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$13,020 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 11 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
26 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 10 issues
2025: 5 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Louisiana average (2.4)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 52%

Near Louisiana avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $13,020

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 26 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
Aug 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0744 (Tag F0744)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or h...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to provide 1:1 observation as ordered for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 17 residents residing in the facility's secured unit.Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/2025 with diagnoses which included Dementia, Anxiety, and Psychosis.Resident #2's admission MDS with an ARD of 08/06/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #2 had behavioral symptoms which interfered with activities or social interactions with others, significantly intruded upon the privacy or activity of others, and significantly disrupted care or the living environment. Resident #2's wandering behavior significantly intruded on the privacy or activities of others. Review of Resident #2's Physician's Orders revealed resident was placed on 1:1 observation every shift, on 08/09/2025. One-to-one observation every shift was discontinued on 08/13/2025 at 8:15 a.m., and re-ordered on 08/14/2025 at 6:00 a.m.Review of Resident #2's Care Plan revealed, in part.Resident #2 was hypersexual with staff and other residents. Interventions included, in part.Place on 1:1 observation every shift. Interview with S3CNA on 08/20/2025 at 3:05 p.m. revealed Resident #2 was ordered to have 1:1 observation, which required staff to stay within arm's reach. S3CNA revealed Resident #2 received 1:1 observation from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day. Interview with S5LPN on 08/20/2025 at 3:30 p.m. revealed Resident #2 was ordered to have 1:1 observation every shift.Interview with S1DON on 08/21/2025 at 3:45 p.m. revealed Resident #2 was ordered to have 1:1 observation.Interview with S9CNA on 08/25/2025 at 11:22 a.m. revealed Resident #2 did not have 1:1 observation from 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. on 08/23/2025 or 08/24/2025.Interview with S6LPN on 08/25/2025 at 1:25 p.m. revealed the facility did not provide Resident #2 with 1:1 observation each day from 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.Interview with S12NP on 08/25/2025 at 2:37 p.m. revealed residents with dementia were more likely to wander and have behaviors at night. S12NP confirmed Resident #2 was to have 1:1 observation at all times.Interview with S11ADM on 08/25/2025 at 2:44 p.m. confirmed Resident #2 was ordered to have 1:1 observation every shift, but had not.
Apr 2025 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented by failing to administer an antidepressant medication as ordere...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented by failing to administer an antidepressant medication as ordered for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents reviewed for care planning. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/27/2025 with diagnoses that included in part .Depression, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of deep veins of right upper extremity, Mild Protein-Calorie malnutrition, Type 2 DM, and Unspecified Dementia. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS with an ARD of 02/09/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance with eating and rolling left and right and was dependent on staff with toileting hygiene, sitting to lying, sitting to standing, and chair/bed to chair transferring. Review of Resident #1's care plan initiated on 01/28/2025 revealed the resident was care planned for Depression with interventions that included .Administer my medications as ordered by my physician and I need continuity with my care. Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed the following: 02/12/2025: Trazodone HCL Oral tablet 100mg, give one tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. Review of Resident #1's March 2025 Medication Administration Record revealed Resident #1 did not receive the daily dose of Trazodone 100mg on 03/24/2025, 03/25/2025, 03/29/2025, and 03/30/2025. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed S5 LPN made an entry on each of the above dates stating Waiting to receive from pharmacy. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 9:00 a.m., S5 LPN confirmed Resident #1 did not receive Trazodone on the above dates. S5 LPN stated the resident did not have any Trazodone in the facility, stating she checked the medication cart and the cubby in the medication room. S5 LPN stated the medication was ordered and she didn't know why it hadn't come in. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 2:30 p.m., S2 DON confirmed Resident #1 did not receive the daily dose of Trazodone as ordered on 03/24/2025, 03/25/2025, 03/29/2025, and 03/30/2025. S2 DON stated the nurse should have called the pharmacy to check on it when it was not available, but did not.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised by failing to update fall interventions after each fall for 1 (#2) of 2 (#1 and #2) residents rev...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised by failing to update fall interventions after each fall for 1 (#2) of 2 (#1 and #2) residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/30/2025 with diagnoses that included in part .Parkinsonism, Major Depressive Disorder, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known psychological condition, Unspecified fall, Unspecified Dementia, and Generalized Anxiety. Review of Resident #2's MDS with an ARD of 02/05/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 7, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #2 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, eating, toileting and transferring. Review of Resident #2's current care plan revealed a focus area of at risk for falls. The care plan documented the resident had falls on 02/13/2025, 02/28/2025, 03/18/2025, and 03/24/2025 (fall occurred on 03/25/2025). Interventions included Educate me on use of my call light, I need a night light on to help me see at night, I use a wheelchair for mobility, Monitor for changes in my condition that may warrant increased supervision/assistance and notify the physician, Place my frequently used items within my reach, and Refer me for therapy screen/evaluation as appropriate. Review of the MDS revealed these interventions were initiated 02/06/2025 with no new interventions put in place after falls on 02/13/2025, 02/28/2025, 03/18/2025, and 03/25/2025. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 10:55 a.m., S6 MDS confirmed that new, individualized fall interventions are put in place after each fall occurs. S6 MDS confirmed new interventions from falls on 02/13/2025, 02/28/2025, 03/18/2025, 03/25/2025, and 03/28/2025 were not care planned but should have been. S6 MDS stated she had not added the new interventions because she had to wait until the DON closed out the incident report. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 2:23 p.m., S2 DON reported new interventions should be added to the care plan by MDS nurse after each fall. S2 DON stated the new interventions should be added to care plan even if the incident and accident reports are not closed out. S2 DON confirmed new interventions had not been care planned after Resident #2 had falls on 02/13/2025, 02/28/2025, 03/18/2025, and 03/25/2025.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standard of practice for 2 (#1 and #2) of 2 sampled residents with falls. The facility failed to en...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standard of practice for 2 (#1 and #2) of 2 sampled residents with falls. The facility failed to ensure neurological checks were completed for 72 hours after an unwitnessed fall or fall with head injury. Findings: Review of facility's undated policy/procedure titled Incident Report Checklist revealed in part .Neuro checks implemented if head injury . Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/27/2025 with diagnoses that included in part .Depression, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of deep veins of right upper extremity, Mild Protein-Calorie malnutrition, Type 2 DM, and Unspecified Dementia. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS with an ARD of 02/09/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance with eating and rolling left and right and was dependent on staff with toileting hygiene, sitting to lying, sitting to standing, and chair/bed to chair transferring. Review of Incident Reports revealed Resident #1 had falls on 02/13/2025, 02/28/2025, and that were unwitnessed or the resident hit his head. Review of neurological observations forms for 02/13/2025, 02/28/2025, and 03/08/2025 revealed the neurological checks were not completed for 72 hours after the resident's falls. Neurological observations were completed for 21 hours on 02/13/2025, 32 hours on 02/28/2025, and 33 hours on 03/08/2025. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 2:30 p.m., S2 DON stated neurological checks/observations should be completed for 72 hours after any unwitnessed fall or fall with head injury. S2 DON confirmed neurological checks were not completed for 72 hours for Resident #1 on 02/13/2025, 02/28/2025, and 03/08/2025 but should have been. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/30/2025 with diagnoses that included in part .Parkinsonism, Major Depressive Disorder, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known psychological condition, Unspecified fall, Unspecified Dementia, and Generalized Anxiety. Review of Resident #2's MDS with an ARD of 02/05/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 7, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #2 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, eating, toileting and transferring. Review of facility Incident Reports revealed Resident #2 had falls on 02/28/2025 and 03/25/2025 resulting in head injury. Review of neurological observations forms for 02/28/2025 and 03/25/2025 revealed the neurological checks were not completed for 72 hours after the resident's falls. Neurological observations were completed for 9 hours on 02/28/2025, and 21 hours on 03/25/2025. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 2:30 p.m., S2 DON stated neurological checks/observations should be completed for 72 hours after any unwitnessed fall or fall with head injury. S2 DON confirmed neurological checks were not completed for 72 hours for Resident #2 on 02/28/2025 and 03/25/2025 but should have been.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prev...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent the development of new pressure ulcers for 2 (#1 and #3) of 2 residents investigated for skin issues by failing to: 1. Perform weekly wound assessments for Resident #3's DTI and 2. Perform wound care as ordered for Residents #1 and #3. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Skin/Wound Documentation Policy and Procedure revealed in part .Skin and wounds will be documented upon admission, readmission, weekly, and as needed. With each dressing change, or at least weekly, the pressure ulcer (injury) wound shall be assessed and documented: date, location of ulcer and staging, size, depth of the wound, presence, location and extent of any undermining or tunneling, presence of exudate, pain, wound bed, description of wound edges and surrounding tissue, and the description of the healing of the pressure ulcer (injury). Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/27/2025 with diagnoses that included in part .Depression, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Deep Veins of Right Upper Extremity, Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Dementia. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS with an ARD of 02/09/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance with rolling left and right and was dependent on staff with toileting hygiene, sitting to lying, sitting to standing, and chair/bed to chair transferring. Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed the following: 03/26/2025: Cleanse abrasion to the left shin with wound cleanser, apply collagen and cover with dry dressing one time a day. 03/13/2025: Cleanse diabetic ulcer to the left 2nd toe with wound cleanser, apply betadine and cover with dry dressing one time a day. 03/13/2025: Cleanse diabetic ulcer to the left 3rd toe with wound cleanser, apply betadine and cover with dry dressing, one time a day. 03/13/2025: Cleanse diabetic ulcer to the left 4th toe with wound cleanser, apply betadine and cover with dry dressing one time a day. 03/05/2025: Cleanse diabetic ulcer to the right first toe MTP (metatarsophalangeal joint) medial with wound cleanser, apply collagen with ag (silver) and cover with dry dressing one time a day. 03/20/2025: Cleanse shearing wound to the left side of the sacrum with wound cleanser, apply skin prep and cover with dry dressing one time a day. 03/05/2025: Cleanse skin tear to the right inner elbow with wound cleanser, apply collagen and cover with dry dressing one time a day. Review of Resident #1's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) for 03/2025 revealed wound care was not completed on 03/29/2025 and 03/30/2025 for the abrasion to left shin; Wound care was not completed on 03/22/2025, 03/23/2025, 03/29/2025, and 03/30/25 for the diabetic ulcers to left second toe, left third toe, left fourth toe, and right first toe MTP; Wound care was not completed on 03/22/2025, 03/23/2025, 03/29/2025, and 03/30/2025 for the shearing wound to left side of the sacrum; Wound care was not completed on 03/22/2025 and 03/23/2025 for the skin tear to right inner elbow. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 2:30 p.m., S2 DON confirmed Resident #1's wound care was not completed on the weekends on 03/22/2025, 03/23/2025, 03/29/2025, and 03/30/2025, but should have been. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/31/2025 with diagnoses that included in part .Non-Ischemic Myocardial Injury, Fracture of Right Acetabulum, Fracture of the Right Pubis, Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Hypothyroidism, Anemia, and Presence of Right Artificial Hip Joint. Review of Resident #3's State Optional MDS with an ARD of 02/08/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 13, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #3 required extensive assistance by one person with bed mobility, toileting, and transferring. Review of Resident #3's physician's orders revealed the following: 04/01/2025: Cleanse stage 3 pressure injury to the right lateral malleolus with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Medi honey, and cover with dry dressing, one time a day. 03/17/2025: Cleanse DTI to the right lateral malleolus with wound cleanser, pat dry, paint with betadine, and cover with dry dressing one time a day. Discontinued on 03/31/2025. 04/01/2025: Cleanse unstageable pressure injury to the right lateral middle foot with wound cleanser, apply Medi honey and cover with dry dressing one time a day. Review of Resident #3's 03/2025 TAR revealed wound care was not performed for the sacral wound or DTI to the right ankle on 03/23/2025, 03/29/2025, and 03/30/2025. Review of Resident #3's progress notes dated 03/17/2025 revealed no notes regarding new wound/DTI to the right lateral malleolus. Review of NP wound care notes dated 03/17/2025 and 03/25/2025 during nursing home rounds revealed wound to the right lateral malleolus was not addressed. Review of NP wound care notes do not address the right lateral malleolus wound until 03/31/2025. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 10:10 a.m., S4 WCN confirmed Resident #3's DTI was discovered on 03/17/2025 and a new physician's wound care order was initiated at that time. S4 WCN confirmed an assessment with measurements was not completed on 03/17/2025. S4 WCN confirmed the DTI was not assessed and measured until 03/31/2025. S4 WCN stated, It's my fault, I must have missed that. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 2:30 p.m., S2 DON acknowledged Resident #3's DTI discovered on 03/17/2025 was not assessed until 03/31/2025. S2 DON confirmed Resident #3's wound care was not completed for the sacral wound or the DTI to the right ankle/lateral malleolus on 03/23/2025, 03/29/2025, and 03/30/2025, but should have been.
Nov 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3), sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure equipment was properly cleaned, labeled and stored. Findings: The facility's policy titled Oxygen Concentrator Cleaning Policy and Procedure with no revision date, read in part . Purpose To keep Oxygen Concentrator and equipment clean. Policy: Resident's Oxygen Concentrator will be kept clean when in resident room. Procedure: 1. All surface areas of the machine will be cleaned with disinfectant wipe or spray when needed. 2. Store Oxygen tubing, cannula, and mask in plastic bag when not in use. 3. Oxygen tubing cannula and mask to be changed out weekly and as needed. 4. Oxygen Concentrator filter to be washed out under running water weekly and as needed. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/07/2022 with diagnosis that included in part .Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, and Cerebral Infarction Unspecified. Review of Resident #3's active Physician orders revealed the following order with a start date of 01/30/2024: Oxygen 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed to keep Oxygen Saturation > 90% with Shortness of Breath every shift. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan with no review date revealed in part .I require Oxygen therapy as needed for Shortness Of Breath while lying flat; I have Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), or Chronic Lung Disease with interventions that included in part . Administer my oxygen as ordered, I need my Oxygen when I have a respiratory crisis, I need my oxygen level tested with a pulse oximetry as ordered by my physician, and I need to have my respirations watched as appropriate. Observation and interview on 11/21/2024 at 10:30 a.m. revealed Resident #3 had an oxygen concentrator beside her bed with an uncovered and unlabeled nasal cannula lying on top of it. The oxygen concentrator had brown stains on the side of it and the filter was heavily covered with dust. Resident #3 revealed the oxygen concentrator belonged to her and she used it when she was Short of Breath. Observation and interview with S1 ADON on 11/21/2024 at 3:40 p.m. in Resident #3's room revealed the following: The oxygen concentrator with the nasal cannula lying on top of it uncovered and unlabeled, brown stains on the side of the concentrator and the filter heavily covered with dust. S1 ADON confirmed Resident #3's oxygen nasal cannula should have been covered and labeled. S1 ADON confirmed Resident #3's oxygen concentrator had brown stains on the side of it and the filter was dirty, and it should not have been.
Jul 2024 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out ADLS (Ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out ADLS (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 (#53 ) of 1 Residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to ensure a Resident (#53) received incontinent care. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled: Incontinence Care and Procedure read in part . Purpose: To keep skin clean, dry, free of irritation and odor, identify skin problems as soon as possible so treatment can be started, prevent skin breakdown, and prevent infection. Review of Resident #53's medical records revealed an admit date [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Schizoaffective Disorder, Unspecified Dementia, and Essential Hypertension. Review of Resident #53's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 04/16/2024 revealed Resident #53 had a BIMS of 01 (Severe Cognitive Impairment). Resident #53 was dependent on staff for all ADL's including toileting, shower/bathing, and personal hygiene. Review of the Facility's grievance log revealed Resident #53's family filed a grievance in 04/2024, 05/2024 and 06/2024 about Resident #53 not being provided incontinent care in a timely manner. Interview on 07/23/2024 at 12:32 p.m. with Resident #53's responsible party revealed she visits daily and Resident #53 is often saturated with urine that goes through his clothing. Resident #53's responsible party revealed she had spoken to management in the facility on several occasions and she continues to find him saturated with soil or feces when she visits. Client #53's responsible party revealed she has marked Resident #53's diapers and has come back 10-12 hours later and he was still in the saturated brief. Interview on 07/23/2024 at 9:02 a.m. with Resident #53's responsible party revealed the hospice aide came and bathed and changed him at 8:45 a.m. Resident #53's responsible party stated she marked the diaper with the time of 8:45 a.m. to see if he would be changed and will check in at 12:00 p.m. . Observation on 07/23/2024 at 12:05 p.m. with S1 DON revealed Resident #53 was wearing a soiled brief that was timed 8:45 a.m., S1 DON confirmed the resident was soiled and that the brief was timed 8:45. S1 DON stated that all residents should have Q2 incontinent care rounds made and confirmed that Resident #53 should had been provided incontinent care in a timely manner. Interview on 07/23/2024 at 12:20 p.m. S8 CNA revealed the last time he changed Resident #53 was at 10:00 a.m. This surveyor questioned S8 CNA about resident brief being timed 8:45 a.m. when we made an observation at 12:05 p.m. and S8 CNA stated he can't recall the exact time he changed Resident #53's brief and that maybe it was around 8:45 a.m S8 CNA then stated he did not change Resident #53 and that he was changed by the hospice aide after this surveyor asked if resident was changed by the hospice aide at 8:24 a.m. S8 CNA then stated he made rounds on the resident in the last 2.5 hours but could not recall time and revealed the resident was not wet. Interview on 07/23/2024 at 1:45 p.m. with S1 DON revealed the facility has had problems in the past with Resident #53 receiving incontinent care in a timely manner and that the processes that were put in place had been ineffective. S1 DON revealed the facility had recently implemented the ambassador round, where management staff make Q2 hours rounds on Resident #53 to ensure he is being provided incontinent care in a timely manner but confirmed the ambassador rounds had not been done today.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0868 (Tag F0868)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include the Medical Director or designee in the Quality Assessment and Assurance process. Total sample size was 31. Findings: Review of the...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include the Medical Director or designee in the Quality Assessment and Assurance process. Total sample size was 31. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Policy And Procedure with no review date revealed in part . Procedure: 4. The committee will consist of at minimum A. Medical Director B. Administrator C. Director of Nursing D. 3 other staff members designated by the facility Interview and record review on 07/24/2024 at 3:39 p.m. with S1 DON revealed the facility's Medical Director or designee had not been included on the Quality Assessment and Assurance Process Sign-in-sheets for March 2024 or June 2024. S1 DON confirmed the facility had no documented evidence of the Medical Director attending the Quality Assessment and Assurance Process Quarterly meetings in March 2024 and June 2024.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections by failing to ensure staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene after touching contaminated areas during wound care for 1(#31) of 2 (#31 and #34) residents observed for wound care. Findings: Review of the Facility's undated policy titled Dressing Change, Clean Policy and Procedure read in part . Purpose 1. To protect the wound. 2. To prevent irritation. 3. To prevent infection and the spread of infection. 4. To promote healing. Review of Resident #31's 07/2024 Physician Orders read in part: 07/02/2024-Cleanse stage 4 pressure injury to right ischium with wound cleanser, fill wound bed with honey and collagen powder, layer with moist Dakin's gauze, cover with absorbent pad and secure with tape. 07/02/2024-Cleanse stage 4 pressure injury to left ischium with wound cleanser, fill wound bed with honey and collagen powder, layer with moist Dakin's gauze, cover with absorbent pad and secure with tape. Observation of wound care for Resident #31 on 07/23/2024 at 2:30 p.m. revealed S7 Treatment Nurse removed old dressing to right and left ischium wound, discarded dressing, then reached over the clean field without removing the soiled gloves or sanitizing hands. S7 Treatment Nurse then removed a 4x4 gauze and wound cleanser with soiled gloves and cleansed the wound. An interview on 07/23/2024 at 2:36 p.m., S7 Treatment Nurse was notified by this surveyor that she failed to remove soiled gloves and sanitize hands prior to obtaining supplies from the clean field and cleansing the wound. S7 Treatment Nurse confirmed that she should have removed the soiled gloves and sanitized her hands after removing the soiled dressing from Resident #31's ischium wound, but did not. Interview on 07/24/2024 at 11:42 a.m. with S2 ADON revealed the staff were not aware of needing to sanitize hands between gloves changing while providing wound care because the wound care policy didn't state that it should be done. S2 ADON confirmed she read the regulation and confirmed hands should have been sanitized after removing gloves while providing wound care. S2 ADON stated she will update the policy and notify staff of the changes.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure controlled medications were adm...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure controlled medications were administered at the time the medication was signed by the nurse as being administered for 9 (#4, #13, #39, #40, #43, #45, #56, #70 and #275) of 13 (#4, #13, #28, #29, #31, #39, #40, #43, #45, #56, #64, #70 and #275) Residents who received controlled medications; and 2. Ensure lab work was drawn in accordance with physician orders for 1 (#7) of 3 (#2, #7 and #21) Residents reviewed for labs. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Drug Management Policy And Procedure with no date, revealed the following, in part: .Administration/Recording: 1. When the medication is removed from stock, the Controlled Substance Disposition Record shall be completed to indicate a. Date, b. Time, c. Resident's name, d. Room number, e. Prescribing physician and f. Signed by the nurse administering the medication . On 07/24/2024 at 1:40 p.m., a narcotic reconciliation was done with S6 LPN and the S1 DON on Hall X medication cart. The Individual Controlled Substance Record sign out sheet was compared to the actual controlled medications on-hand, and revealed the following discrepancies which was verified by S6 LPN and S1 DON at the time of the observation: Resident #4 Review of the physician's order dated 07/20/2024 revealed Norco Oral Tablet 10-325 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of the Individual Controlled Substances Record for Resident #4 revealed there were 9 tablets of Norco Oral Tablet 10-325 mg remaining. The last entry signed out by S6 LPN was on 07/24/2024, indicating that 1 tablet was given at 4:00 p.m. with 9 tablets remaining. Observations on 07/24/2024 around 1:40 p.m. of Resident #4's medication card of Norco 10-325 mg revealed there were 10 tablets remaining, instead of 9 tablets as indicated on the Individual controlled Substance Record. Resident #13 Review of the physician's order dated 04/05/2024 revealed Norco Oral Tablet 7.5-325 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours. Review of the Individual Controlled Substances Record for Resident #13 revealed there were 63 tablets of Norco Oral Tablet 7.5-325 mg remaining. The last entry signed out by S6 LPN was on 07/24/2024, indicating that 1 tablet was given at 4:00 p.m. with 63 tablets remaining. Observations on 07/24/2024 around 1:40 p.m. of the medication card of Norco 7.5-325 mg revealed there were 64 tablets remaining, instead of 63 tablets as indicated on the Individual controlled Substance Record. Resident #39 Review of the physician's order dated 12/13/2024 revealed Norco Oral Tablet 10-325 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours. Review of the Individual Controlled Substances Record for Resident #39 revealed there were 53 tablets of Norco Oral Tablet 10-325 mg remaining. The last entry signed out by S6 LPN was on 07/24/2024, indicating that 1 tablet was given at 2:00 p.m. with 53 tablets remaining. Observations on 07/24/2024 around 1:40 p.m. of Resident #39's medication card of Norco 10-325 mg revealed there were 55 tablets remaining, instead of 53 tablets as indicated on the Individual controlled Substance Record. Resident #40 Review of the physician's order dated 08/10/2023 revealed Xanax Oral Tablet 1 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of the Individual Controlled Substances Record for Resident #40 revealed there were 23 tablets of Xanax Oral Tablet 1 mg remaining. The last entries signed out by S6 LPN was on 07/24/2024 indicating that 1 tablet was given at 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. with 23 tablets remaining. Observations on 07/24/2024 around 1:40 p.m. of Resident #40's medication card of Xanax 1 mg revealed there were 25 tablets remaining, instead of 23 tablets as indicated on the Individual controlled Substance Record. Resident #43 Review of the physician's order dated 01/24/2024 revealed Xanax Oral Tablet 0.25 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of the Individual Controlled Substances Record for Resident #43 revealed there were 30 tablets of Xanax Oral Tablet 0.25 mg remaining. The last entry signed out by S6 LPN was on 07/24/2024 indicating that 1 tablet was given at 4:00 p.m. with 30 tablets remaining. Observations on 07/24/2024 around 1:40 p.m. of Resident #40's medication card of Xanax 0.25 mg revealed there were 31 tablets remaining, instead of 30 tablets as indicated on the Individual controlled Substance Record. Resident #45 Review of the physician's order dated 06/01/2024 revealed Oxycodone HCL Oral Tablets 10 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain. Review of the Individual Controlled Substances Record for Resident #45 revealed there were 49 tablets of Oxycodone HCL Oral 10 mg tablets remaining. The last entry signed out by S6 LPN was on 07/24/2024 indicating that 1 tablet was given at 2:00 p.m. with 49 tablets remaining. Observations on 07/24/2024 around 1:40 p.m. of Resident #45's medication card of Oxycodone HCL10 mg revealed there were 50 tablets remaining, instead of 49 tablets as indicated on the Individual controlled Substance Record. Resident #56 Review of the physician's order dated 06/26/2024 revealed Ativan Oral Tablets 0.5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times per day. Review of the Individual Controlled Substances Record for Resident #56 revealed there were 8 tablets of Ativan Oral Tablets 0.5 mg tablets remaining. The last entry signed out by S6 LPN was on 07/24/2024 indicating that 1 tablet was given at 4:00 p.m. with 8 tablets remaining. Observations on 07/24/2024 around 1:40 p.m. of Resident #56's medication card of Ativan 0.5 mg revealed there were 9 tablets remaining, instead of 8 tablets as indicated on the Individual controlled Substance Record. Resident #70 Review of the physician's order dated 05/09/2024 revealed Lorazepam Oral Tablets 1 mg give 1 tablet by mouth 3 times per day. Review of the Individual Controlled Substances Record for Resident #70 revealed there were 9 tablets of Lorazepam 9 mg tablets remaining. The last entry signed out by S6 LPN was on 07/24/2024 indicating that 1 tablet was given at 4:00 p.m. with 9 tablets remaining. Observations on 07/24/2024 around 1:40 p.m. of Resident #70's medication card of Lorazepam 0.5 mg revealed there were 10 tablets remaining, instead of 9 tablets as indicated on the Individual controlled Substance Record. Resident #275 Review of the physician's order dated 07/06/2024 revealed Clonazepam Oral Tablets 2 mg give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times per day. Review of the Individual Controlled Substances Record for Resident #275 revealed there were 44 tablets of Clonazepam 2 mg tablets remaining. The last entry signed out by S6 LPN was on 07/24/2024 indicating that 1 tablet was given at 4:00 p.m. with 44 tablets remaining. Observations on 07/24/2024 around 1:40 p.m. of Resident #275's medication card of Clonazepam 2 mg revealed there were 45 tablets remaining, instead of 44 tablets as indicated on the Individual controlled Substance Record. An interview on 07/24/2024 with S6 LPN at approximately 1:40 p.m. at the time of the observations, revealed that she had signed the Individual Controlled Substance Record indicating the medications were administered. She reported that she should have signed out the controlled medications at the time of administration rather than ahead of time. She stated that she signed out her 4:00 p.m. narcotic medications earlier that day. An interview on 07/24/24 at 1:45 p.m. with S1 DON revealed that controlled substances should be signed out when they are administered. She stated that if a controlled substance is signed out by the nurse and not administered, the nurse should waste and/or dispose of the medicine in the presence of another nurse. S1 DON said both nurses would sign the Individual Controlled Substance Record indicating that the medication was wasted and/or destroyed. She stated that S6 LPN should not have signed out the controlled medication unless she was going to immediately administer the medication. 2. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admit date of 04/19/2024, with diagnoses that included in part . Schizoaffective Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Epilepsy, Chronic Pulmonary Edema, and Anxiety Disorder. Review Resident #7's MDS with an ARD of 06/21/2024 revealed a BIMS of 07, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7's physicians order dated 04/19/2024 read in part . Depakote level monthly (Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec). Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed Depakote levels were done on 04/22/204 and 07/22/2024. An interview on 07/24/24 at 11:30 a.m. with S2 ADON revealed that she was the admitting nurse for Resident #7. She reported that the attending physician ordered Depakote levels to be done monthly. She stated that Depakote levels were done on 04/22/2024 and 07/22/2024. S2 ADON said that Depakote levels were not done in May 2024 or June 2024.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines. The facility failed to follow the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines. The facility failed to follow the menu in regard to portion size to ensure nutritional adequacy of the meal for 9 residents that received mechanically altered diets prepared by the facility kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's approved Menu Matrix menu revealed on 07/22/2024 the facility was on week 5. The Pureed Diet lunch to be served with serving size consisted of Beef Meatloaf 4oz., Black eye peas 4oz., Cauliflower with cheese mix 1/3 cup, and Pound cake 4 oz. Observation on 07/22/2024 at 12:10 p.m. revealed S4 Dietary [NAME] serving a pureed lunch tray using a 3 oz scoop for the pureed meatloaf. S4 Dietary [NAME] revealed she served the pureed meatloaf with a 3oz scoop but the 4oz scoop was required and should have been used. Interview on 07/22/24 at 12:15 p.m. with S6 Dietary manager confirmed that S4 Dietary cook was using the 3oz scoop instead of the 4ox scoop per serving that was supposed to be used. S6 Dietary Manager revealed that she typically checks the scoop sizes prior to serving meals but had forgotten today. She confirmed the wrong scoop size was used but should not have been.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that pureed foods were prepared by methods which conserved nutritional value for 9 Residents who were ordered and serve...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that pureed foods were prepared by methods which conserved nutritional value for 9 Residents who were ordered and served pureed diets. Findings: Review of the facility's approved Menu Matrix menu revealed on 07/22/2024 the facility was on week 5. The Pureed Diet lunch to be served with serving size consisted of Beef Meatloaf 4oz., Black eye peas 4oz., Cauliflower with cheese mix 1/3 cup, and Pound cake 4 oz. Interview and observation on 07/22/2024 at 10:35 a.m. S5 Dietary [NAME] revealed there are 9 resident that received puree meats. S5 Dietary cook was observed using (8) 3oz meat patties, unmeasured amount of bread crumbs and 3 cups of water and added them to the blender. S5 Dietary [NAME] revealed she does not use a recipe because she had been cooking for so long. S5 dietary [NAME] stated (8) 3oz patties should be enough for the 9 pureed resident because the water and breadcrumbs have been added. Interview on 07/22/2024 at 12:15 p.m. S5 Dietary Manager confirmed the recipe for the pureed meals were not followed because she could not locate them, but should have been used. Interview on 07/23/2024 at 3:46 p.m. with S9 RD revealed the recipe for all meals should be followed to ensure residents are receiving adequate caloric intake.
May 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of D...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (#1 and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents, and 4 (#R1, #R2, #R3, and #R4) of 6 (#R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, and #R6 random sampled residents. Findings: Resident #1 Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admit date of 10/24/2023, with diagnoses that included: Quadriplegia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Type 2 Diabetes, Hypoglycemia, Major Depressive Disorder, Chronic Pain, and Hypertension. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/25/2024, revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 was dependent for shower/bath, toileting, hygiene, and toilet transfer. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed she required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included assist with bathing as needed. Review of a Grievance/Complaint Report dated 05/10/2024, revealed Resident #1 complained she was not getting her bath as scheduled. Interview with Resident #1 on 05/15/2024 at 9:43 a.m., revealed she was scheduled for a bed bath on 05/14/2024; however, the facility did not have enough CNAs to give her a bed bath on 05/14/2024. Resident #1 stated CNAs are to document when they provide ADL care, or give her a bed bath. Resident #1 revealed she required two CNAs for ADL care. Review of a Staff Rounding Tool located in Resident #1's room, and dated 05/14/2024, revealed Resident #1 did not receive a bed bath on 05/14/2024. Interview with S2 ADON on 05/15/2024 at 9:45 a.m., revealed the Staff Rounding Tool was to ensure staff provided care, and the care was documented. S2 ADON revealed on 05/14/2024, Resident #1 should have received a bed bath, and the bed bath should have been documented. S2 ADON confirmed no bed bath was documented for 05/14/2024. Resident #3 Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admit date of 01/26/2024, with diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb, and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications. Review of Resident #3's MDS with an ARD of 05/03/2024, revealed a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #3 required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathe. Review of Resident #3's care plan revealed he required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Interview with Resident #3 on 05/12/2024 at 7:04 p.m., revealed he had a Foley catheter, and he wanted a bath every day. He stated the facility did not have enough staff for him to receive a bath when he wanted a bath. Resident #3 stated his last bath was 2 days ago on 05/10/2024, and that he wanted a bath today (05/12/2024). However, there was only one CNA on hall C. Resident #3 stated she did not receive a bath on that day as requested. Interview with S3 LPN on 05/12/2024 at 7:53 p.m. confirmed Resident #3 wanted a bath today. However, she stated only one CNA worked hall C from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. She stated she told Resident #3 she would bath him after her medication pass. S3 LPN confirmed Resident #3 did not receive a bath on this shift. #R1 Review of the medical record for R1 revealed an admit date of 04/12/2024, with diagnoses that included: Lower Back Pain, Chronic Kidney, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, and Right Heart Failure. Review of #R1's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed #R1 required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathe. Review of #R1's care plan revealed required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Review of #R1's Bathing Task for 05/08/2024 revealed N/A, 05/09/2024 revealed no documentation, and 05/10/2024 revealed N/A. Interview with #R1 on 05/16/2024 at 9:00 a.m. revealed he has not had a bath in one week. Interview with S4 Shower CNA on 05/14/2024 at 9:28 a.m., revealed she started as a Shower CNA on 05/07/2024. S4 Shower CNA stated she did not provide a bath to #R1 on 05/07/2024, 05/08/2024, and 05/09/2024, because she was pulled to work the floor. #R2 Review of the medical record for #R2 revealed an admit date of 02/24/2021, with a diagnosis of Disorder involving the immune mechanism. Review of #R2's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #R2 required substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe. Review of #R2's care plan revealed she required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Review of #R2's Bathing Task for 05/07/2024 and 05/09/2024 revealed no documentation that he received a bath. Interview with #R2 on 05/16/2024 at 9:52 a.m., revealed the facility did not have enough CNAs. She stated she had been waiting in a BM diaper for 2 hours today. She stated her bath days are Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday; however, she did not receive a bath on 05/07/2024 or 05/09/2024. Interview with S5 CNA 05/16/2024 at 9:54 a.m., revealed she clocked in at 7:30 a.m. at the sister facility, and then she was pulled from the sister facility to help with baths today. She revealed #R2 had been sitting in a diaper soiled with BM for 2 hours. #R3 Review of the medical record for #R3 revealed an admit date of 01/29/2024, and a readmission date of 03/07/2024. Diagnosis included: Acute Embolism and Thrombosis, Type 2 Diabetes, Hemorrhagic Condition, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Anemia, Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease, and Depressive Disorder. Review of #R3's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed #R3 required substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe. Review of #R3's care plan revealed she required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Review of #R3's Bathing Task for 05/06/2024 and 05/08/2024 revealed no documentation that she received a bath. Interview with #R3 on 05/16/2024 at 10:09 a.m., revealed the facility did not have enough CNAs. She stated she only received a whirlpool whenever the staff could get to her, and that was not often. #R3 revealed she received a whirlpool on 05/10/2024. #R4 Review of the medical record for #R4 revealed an admit date of 11/24/2023, with a readmission date of 04/29/2024. Diagnosis included: Cerebral Infarction due to Embolism of Right middle Cerebral, Anemia, Type 2 Diabetes, Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, and Pain. Review of #R4's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #R4 was dependent on staff for shower/bathe. Review of #R4's care plan revealed she required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Review of #R4's Bathing Task for 05/06/2024, 05/08/2024 and 05/10/2024 revealed no documentation that #R4 received a bath on those dates. Interview with #R4 on 05/16/2024 at 10:14 a.m., revealed the facility did not have enough CNAs. She stated she had not received a bath in several days. Review of Resident Council Meeting minutes revealed the following in part . March 28, 2024 at 1:44 p.m. - Nursing/CNA: More CNA staff needed for 6:00 p.m.to 6:00 a.m. April 25, 2024 at 2:40 p.m. - Nursing/CNA: More CNA staff needed for 6:00 p.m to 6:00 a.m. Interview with S8 CNA Supervsior on 05/13/2024 at 2:12 p.m., confirmed the facility was short of staff on 05/12/2024 for the 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. shifts, due to call ins, and residents did not receive baths as care planned. Interview with S10 Shower CNA/Shower on 05/14/2024 at 9:28 a.m., revealed she was the shower CNA on C hall. She stated on 05/07/2024, 05/08/2024 and 05/09/2024 she did not give whirlpools/showers because she was pulled to work the floor due to call-ins. Interview with S11 Shower CNA on 05/14/2024 at 9:38 a.m., revealed she documented N/A on the task sheets when pulled to the floor and bathes were not done She stated she did not give baths on 05/09/2024 because she was pulled to the hall to work. S11 CNA revealed the facility was short of staff. She stated she gave 1 whirlpool and 1 bedbath on 05/13/2024, because she was the only CNA on the hall. Interview on 05/15/2024 at 3:10 p.m. with S7 CNA, revealed she worked C hall alone on Sunday 05/12/2024, because the other CNA called in. Interview on 05/15/2024 at 4:00 p.m. with S11 Administrator confirmed the facility was short of CNAs.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to attain or maintain the highes...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for each resident. The facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene according to their plan of care, for 2 (#1 and #3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents, and 4 (#R1, #R2, #R3, and #R4) of 6 (#R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, and #R6) random sampled residents. The facility also failed to ensure sufficient staff was available to ensure residents who required supervision while smoking, were able to smoke at the appointed times, for 2 (#R5 and #R6) of 2 (#R5 and #R6) random sampled residents. Findings: Resident #1 Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admit date of 10/24/2023, with diagnoses that included: Quadriplegia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Type 2 Diabetes, Hypoglycemia, Major Depressive Disorder, Chronic Pain, and Hypertension. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/25/2024, revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 was dependent for shower/bath, toileting, hygiene, and toilet transfer. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed she required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included assist with bathing as needed. Review of a Grievance/Complaint Report dated 05/10/2024, revealed Resident #1 complained she was not getting her bath as scheduled. Interview with Resident #1 on 05/15/2024 at 9:43 a.m., revealed she was scheduled for a bed bath on 05/14/2024; however, the facility did not have enough CNAs to give her a bed bath on 05/14/2024. Resident #1 stated CNAs are to document when they provide ADL care, or give her a bed bath. Resident #1 revealed she required two CNAs for ADL care. Review of a Staff Rounding Tool located in Resident #1's room, and dated 05/14/2024, revealed Resident #1 did not receive a bed bath on 05/14/2024. Interview with S2 ADON on 05/15/2024 at 9:45 a.m., revealed the Staff Rounding Tool was to ensure staff provided care, and the care was documented. S2 ADON revealed on 05/14/2024, Resident #1 should have received a bed bath, and the bed bath should have been documented. S2 ADON confirmed no bed bath was documented for 05/14/2024. Resident #3 Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admit date of 01/26/2024, with diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb, and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications. Review of Resident #3's MDS with an ARD of 05/03/2024, revealed a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #3 required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathe. Review of Resident #3's care plan revealed he required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Interview with Resident #3 on 05/12/2024 at 7:04 p.m., revealed he had a Foley catheter, and he wanted a bath every day. He stated the facility did not have enough staff for him to receive a bath when he wanted a bath. Resident #3 stated his last bath was 2 days ago on 05/10/2024, and that he wanted a bath today (05/12/2024). However, there was only one CNA on hall C. Resident #3 stated she did not receive a bath on that day as requested. Interview with S3 LPN on 05/12/2024 at 7:53 p.m. confirmed Resident #3 wanted a bath today. However, she stated only one CNA worked hall C from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. She stated she told Resident #3 she would bath him after her medication pass. S3 LPN confirmed Resident #3 did not receive a bath on this shift. #R1 Review of the medical record for R1 revealed an admit date of 04/12/2024, with diagnoses that included: Lower Back Pain, Chronic Kidney, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, and Right Heart Failure. Review of #R1's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed #R1 required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathe. Review of #R1's care plan revealed required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Review of #R1's Bathing Task for 05/08/2024 revealed N/A, 05/09/2024 revealed no documentation, and 05/10/2024 revealed N/A. Interview with #R1 on 05/16/2024 at 9:00 a.m. revealed he has not had a bath in one week. Interview with S4 Shower CNA on 05/14/2024 at 9:28 a.m., revealed she started as a Shower CNA on 05/07/2024. S4 Shower CNA stated she did not provide a bath to #R1 on 05/07/2024, 05/08/2024, and 05/09/2024, because she was pulled to work the floor. #R2 Review of the medical record for #R2 revealed an admit date of 02/24/2021, with a diagnosis of Disorder involving the immune mechanism. Review of #R2's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #R2 required substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe. Review of #R2's care plan revealed she required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Review of #R2's Bathing Task for 05/07/2024 and 05/09/2024 revealed no documentation that he received a bath. Interview with #R2 on 05/16/2024 at 9:52 a.m., revealed the facility did not have enough CNAs. She stated she had been waiting in a BM diaper for 2 hours today. She stated her bath days are Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday; however, she did not receive a bath on 05/07/2024 or 05/09/2024. Interview with S5 CNA 05/16/2024 at 9:54 a.m., revealed she clocked in at 7:30 a.m. at the sister facility, and then she was pulled from the sister facility to help with baths today. She revealed #R2 had been sitting in a diaper soiled with BM for 2 hours. #R3 Review of the medical record for #R3 revealed an admit date of 01/29/2024, and a readmission date of 03/07/2024. Diagnosis included: Acute Embolism and Thrombosis, Type 2 Diabetes, Hemorrhagic Condition, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Anemia, Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease, and Depressive Disorder. Review of #R3's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS revealed #R3 required substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe. Review of #R3's care plan revealed she required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Review of #R3's Bathing Task for 05/06/2024 and 05/08/2024 revealed no documentation that she received a bath. Interview with #R3 on 05/16/2024 at 10:09 a.m., revealed the facility did not have enough CNAs. She stated she only received a whirlpool whenever the staff could get to her, and that was not often. #R3 revealed she received a whirlpool on 05/10/2024. #R4 Review of the medical record for #R4 revealed an admit date of 11/24/2023, with a readmission date of 04/29/2024. Diagnosis included: Cerebral Infarction due to Embolism of Right middle Cerebral, Anemia, Type 2 Diabetes, Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, and Pain. Review of #R4's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #R4 was dependent on staff for shower/bathe. Review of #R4's care plan revealed she required staff assistance for all ADL's. Interventions included to assist with bathing, hygiene and grooming. Review of #R4's Bathing Task for 05/06/2024, 05/08/2024 and 05/10/2024 revealed no documentation that #R4 received a bath on those dates. Interview with #R4 on 05/16/2024 at 10:14 a.m., revealed the facility did not have enough CNAs. She stated she had not received a bath in several days. Review of Resident Council Meeting minutes revealed the following in part . March 28, 2024 at 1:44 p.m. - Nursing/CNA: More CNA staff needed for 6:00 p.m.to 6:00 a.m. April 25, 2024 at 2:40 p.m. - Nursing/CNA: More CNA staff needed for 6:00 p.m to 6:00 a.m. Interview with S8 CNA Supervsior on 05/13/2024 at 2:12 p.m., confirmed the facility was short of staff on 05/12/2024 for the 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. shifts, due to call ins, and residents did not receive baths as care planned. Interview with S10 Shower CNA/Shower on 05/14/2024 at 9:28 a.m., revealed she was the shower CNA on C hall. She stated on 05/07/2024, 05/08/2024 and 05/09/2024 she did not give whirlpools/showers because she was pulled to work the floor due to call-ins. Interview with S11 Shower CNA on 05/14/2024 at 9:38 a.m., revealed she documented N/A on the task sheets when pulled to the floor and bathes were not done She stated she did not give baths on 05/09/2024 because she was pulled to the hall to work. S11 CNA revealed the facility was short of staff. She stated she gave 1 whirlpool and 1 bedbath on 05/13/2024, because she was the only CNA on the hall. Interview on 05/15/2024 at 3:10 p.m. with S7 CNA, revealed she worked C hall alone on Sunday 05/12/2024, because the other CNA called in. Interview on 05/15/2024 at 4:00 p.m. with S11 Administrator confirmed the facility was short of CNAs. #R5 and #R6 Observation of the Secure Care Unit on 05/12/2024 at 7:10 p.m., revealed #R5 and #R6 were sitting in the day room watching television. #R5 and #R6 informed surveyor they should have had a smoke break at 5:00 p.m.; however, the unit had one CNA and they had to wait for more help to come. #R5 Review of the medical record for #R5 revealed an admit date of 03/13/2024, with diagnoses that included: Cerebral Infarction, Alcohol Abuse, Hypertension, and Seizures. Review of #R5's admission MDS with an ARD of 03/25/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. #R6 Review of the medical record for #R6 revealed an admisson diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, Schizoaffective Disorder, Hypertension, and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA). Review of #R6's MDS with an ARD of 03/25/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Interview on 05/12/2024 at 7:25 p.m. with S14 CNA, revealed she was pulled to work the unit from the sister facility. She confirmed she was the only CNA on the hall, and she had to wait for another CNA to come before going outside with the smokers. S14 CNA confirmed #R5 and #R6 had to wait to smoke because all smokers were supervised, and no one was available to go out with them to smoke at that time.
Feb 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Surve...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Reporting and Investigation Policy and Procedure revealed in part . All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) . Review of an incident report for Resident #1 dated 01/24/2024 at 8:12 a.m. documented by S2 DON revealed in part . Incident Description: Nursing Description: Resident #1 reported to the morning CNAs that she had been sexually assaulted by a female during the night. Resident Description: Please see progress note. Review of a progress note dated 01/24/2024 at 9:40 a.m. documented by S3 ADON revealed in part . Per CNA reported to this nurse at approximately 7:38 a.m. that Resident #1 was on the phone with 911 and was telling them that she was raped last night .Resident #1 stated she was raped by another woman. This nurse stepped out of the room to meet Police Officer who was dispatched. S2 DON notified at 7:42 a.m. and S1 Administrator notified at 7:43 a.m. Interview on 02/06/2024 at 9:05 a.m. with S1 Administrator revealed she was notified of the allegation of sexual abuse on 01/24/2024 at 7:43 a.m. S1 Administrator confirmed she did not enter the allegation into the SIMS (Statewide Incident Management System), but she should have.
Jul 2023 2 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to increase supervision of residents at risk for elopement...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to increase supervision of residents at risk for elopement and respond to alarms appropriately, for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents for elopement. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure door exit alarms could be heard by all staff in residents' rooms when the doors are closed; 2. Ensure a system of staff response was in place when the door alarm sounded, and staff were knowledgeable of the response system; and 3. Ensure Administration was notified when staff became aware that the alarm system and doors were not functioning properly. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/17/2023 at 6:15 p.m., when Resident #1 who had a diagnosis of Dementia, exhibited exit seeking behaviors and wore a Wanderguard bracelet, exited the facility after the door exit alarm. Resident #1 was found by local police at 6:30 p.m. near a busy four lane highway that ran parallel to the facility. The facility's continued failure to identify potential system failures and respond appropriately, resulted in the immediate jeopardy continuing on 06/04/2023 at 8:00 a.m., when Resident #2 who had a diagnosis of Dementia, exhibited exit seeking behaviors and wore a Wanderguard bracelet, exited the facility, although staff were aware of a previous door malfunction, walked alongside a busy four lane highway, crossed a two lane highway that intersected the four lane highway, and was found at a convenience store by store staff 0.2 miles away. This deficient practice continues at a potential for more than minimal harm for all 5 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) assessed as being at risk for elopement, have exit seeking behaviors, and wore Wanderguard alert bracelets. S1Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation on 07/18/2023 at 3:21 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy situation was removed on 07/19/2023 at 5:00 p.m. when an acceptable plan of removal was presented. The facility's plan to remove the immediate jeopardy situation included the following: On May 17, 2023 Resident #1619 eloped from the facility. On June 4, 2023 Resident #1586 eloped from the facility. These incidents have the potential to affect all 5 residents who are at risk for elopement, and have been identified with exit seeking behaviors and require supervision. Staff being unable to hear the Wanderguard alarm sound when in a resident's room with the door closed, and thus failed to adequately supervise these residents, has been identified as the root cause of the elopement. The facility put the following corrective actions in place for the residents affected by the alleged deficient practice: On 07/18/2023 at 4:00 p.m., an operational check was completed on all exit doors by the Medical Equipment vendor to evaluate the current operational status of the magnetic door locking system. The volume was increased on the Hall W exit door. All exit Door codes were changed on 07/18/2023 by the Medical Equipment vendor. On 07/18/2023 at 4:30 p.m., an assigned employee was placed at the nurse's station as a Door Watch across all shifts to monitor the facility's Wanderguard annunciator panel to ensure the residents' safety and well-being. Door Watch staff will be in-serviced by the Administrator/Designee on required duties prior to assuming the Door Watch assignment. Door Watch staff will have no additional duties. Door alarm monitoring will be documented every 30 minutes by assigned staff. The Administrator/Designee will supervise the door watch documents 5 times weekly for 4 weeks to ensure no further issues have occurred. The Elopement and Wandering Resident Policy was reviewed and updated on 06/05/2023. The Elopement Risk Binder was reviewed on 07/18/2023 by the Director of Nursing to ensure the binder information is current. The Elopement Risk Binder will be updated by the MDS staff when a resident is identified with changes in cognition and if there are new admissions to the facility that meet the criteria for elopement risk and require a Wanderguard bracelet. The binder will be reviewed by the Director of Nursing/Designee weekly to ensure continued accuracy. Wanderguard bracelet for Resident #1586, #1596, #1604, #1607, and #1619 were checked on 07/18/2023 to ensure proper working order, and were functioning properly. Education of all staff by the Administrator/Designee on residents at risk for elopement and proper monitoring of those residents and current residents at risk for elopement began immediately on 07/18/2023, and will be completed on 07/19/2023. Upon hire, employees will be educated on the Elopement and Wandering Residents Policy, and annually thereafter unless such actions occur again. The QA Committee will supervise staff education to ensure all staff are properly educated. Resident that have been identified as elopement risk will be supervised by Administration/Designee or nursing staff/designee every 15 minutes for 7 days, then every 30 minutes for 7 days, then every hour continuously. The Administrator/Designee will monitor elopement risk documentation 5 times a week for 4 weeks. The QA Committee will discuss during daily or weekly meetings the interventions put in place as a result of the elopements that occurred on 05/17/2023 and 06/04/2023, and evaluations of interventions and if there is a need for an altered plan of interventions. The QA Committee will designate each department head to monitor/supervise weekly for a minimum of 3 months. The magnetic locking door system will be checked every 30 minutes by Administrative/Designee or nursing staff for 2 weeks then every hour for 2 weeks. The Administrator/Designee will monitor the door locking system checks 5 times a week for 4 weeks. Elopement Risk Assessments are completed by the MDS staff for all new admissions. A QAPI Performance Improvement Project will be implemented to review all corrective actions. All findings will be discussed at the monthly QAA meeting for a minimum of 3 months and quarterly thereafter for continued compliance and further interventions if needed Estimated completion date of 07/19/2023. For the remainder of this document Resident #1 is #1619, Resident #2 is #1586, Resident #3 is #1607, Resident #4 is #1596, and Resident #5 is #1604. Findings: Resident #1 Review of the facility Elopement policy revealed the following in part . Policy Statement: Please contact 911. Review of the Elopement policy revealed no information regarding prevention of elopement, or the procedure to follow in the event a door alarm sounds. Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet revealed an admit date of 03/30/2023 with diagnoses that included: Unspecified Dementia; Schizoaffective Disorder; Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent; Anxiety Disorder; and Insomnia, unspecified. Review of Resident #1's Wanderguard consent form dated 04/12/2023 revealed Wanderguard to wheelchair secondary elopement risk. Recommended restraint: Wanderguard with census checks q 2 hours. Medical symptoms warranting use: wanders in hallways in wheelchair and verbalizes she wants to go home. Reassess in 90 days. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/07/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 14 (cognitively intact). Resident #1 had behavior symptoms (pacing) not directed toward others, and was dependent with chair to bed transfers and walking 10 feet. Resident #1 used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident #1 Comprehensive Care Plan revealed the following in part . Elopement: Potential for elopement r/t current diagnosis dementia 06/05/2023. Plan: 1. Redirect and reorient as needed. 2. Elopement/Wandering risk assessment for potential for elopement completed on admit, quarterly, and prn. 4. Apply Wanderguard bracelet if indicated with transmitter test q day. 5. Monitor and document visual census check as indicated. 6. Utilize a discrete personal identifier so staff is aware resident is at risk for elopement (running man placed on resident's door). 9. Notify MD and RR of any actual elopements. Has Wanderguards with census checks q 30 minutes. 07/07/2023 - Continue with Wanderguard to right lower leg with census checks of 1 hour. Continue with Wanderguard on front of w/c when/if resident gets up in w/c for short periods. Review of Resident #1's 04/03/2023 Risk of Elopement/Wandering Review revealed in part . Resident #1 verbalized that she wanted to go home, but did not seek exits. 04/12/2023 - Resident #1 verbalized that she wanted to go home, did not seek exits, but told S6 LPN that she wanted to leave, Wanderguard placed on front of w/c. 05/17/2023 - Resident #1 eloped from building with Wanderguard already attached to w/c. Wanderguard with census checks q 30 minutes for 24 hours, and Wanderguard to left lower leg and continue with Wanderguard on front of w/c. 05/18/2023 - Census checks to every hour. 06/04/2023 - Resident #1 has history of elopement. Continue with Wanderguard and census checks. 06/06/2023 - Wanderguard moved to right lower leg secondary to edema/wound to left lower extremity. 07/07/2023 - Continue with Wanderguard to right lower leg and front of w/c when Resident #1 gets up for short periods. Continue with census checks every hour. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed the following: 04/12/2023 at 9:00 a.m. - Wanderguard with census checks q 2 hours. Wanderguard placed on front of w/c. Wander Guard transmitter test q day 6/2 shift. 05/17/2023 at 6:45 p.m. - Wanderguard with census checks q 30 minutes x 24 hours. Wander Guard to left lower leg and continue with Wanderguard on front of w/c. 05/18/2023 at 3:30 p.m. - Continue Wanderguard on front of w/c and left lower leg, and change census checks to q hour. 06/04/2023 (no time noted) - Change Wanderguard with census checks to q 30 minutes. 06/06/2023 (no time noted) - Wander Guard changed to right lower leg with census checks q 15 minutes x 72 hours as of 06/05/2023, then q 30 minutes x 72 hours then q 1 hours (expiration 01/2024) secondary to edema/wound to LLE. Continue with Wander Guard on front of w/c. Review of the facility's 05/19/2023 Investigation Report revealed an incident was reported to S1 Administrator on 05/17/2023 at 6:36 p.m., that local police brought Resident #1 back to the facility after recovering her from the side of the highway. Observation on 07/17/2023 at 10:04 a.m. revealed Resident #1 lying in bed, and a Wanderguard bracelet was noted to Resident #1's right lower leg. Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person and place. Interview with Resident #1 at that time however, revealed she was unable to remember leaving the facility unsupervised on 05/17/2023. Telephone interview conducted on 07/17/2023 at 10:49 a.m. with S5 CNA revealed she worked the night Resident #1 left the building. S5 CNA stated she did not work on Resident #1's hall, but she heard the alarm go off. S5 CNA stated she went to the nurse's station to see which door was alarming, and went to the door at the end of Hall W. S5 CNA stated she opened the door, looked around, and did not see anyone. S5 CNA stated she could not remember if there were any cars in the parking lot. S5 CNA stated she did not see anyone outside so she thought the door was messed up. S5 CNA stated she went back to the nurse's station and as she arrived, the door alarm went off again. S5 CNA stated she went back to Hall W door and looked outside again and did not see anyone. S5 CNA stated she then went back to her hall to work. S5 CNA stated she told the nurse on duty, but was not instructed to do anything further. S5 CNA stated she did not perform a resident check at that time, and was not instructed to do so. S5 CNA stated the CNA assigned to Hall W, came and told her the police brought Resident #1 back to the facility. Interview on 07/17/2023 at 11:12 a.m. with S6 LPN revealed she was not working at the facility when the incident with Resident #1 occurred, but she received a telephone call from S1 Administrator and went to the facility. S6 LPN stated she received report that Resident #1 had been picked up down the highway by the local police and returned to the facility. S6 LPN stated Resident #1 was assessed when she returned and was found without any injuries. S6 LPN stated she sat with Resident #1 upon return and ask her how she left the building. S6 LPN stated Resident #1 said she put in the code and left. S6 LPN stated she asked what the code was, and Resident #1 did not give the correct code. S6 LPN stated staff were instructed to check doors when they heard an alarm. Telephone interview on 07/17/2023 at 11:52 a.m. with S4 LPN revealed she was assigned to Hall W the night of the incident with Resident #1. S4 LPN stated she came out of a resident's room on Hall W at approximately 6:30 p.m., to find a police officer and Resident #1 standing outside of the door at the end of Hall W. S4 LPN stated the police officer stated she was bringing me (S4 LPN) a patient. S4 LPN stated she had not been notified an alarm had gone off, and she had not heard an alarm. S4 LPN stated she last observed Resident #1 at 4:30 p.m. S4 LPN stated before Resident #2's elopement, a resident was able to leave the building if the door was opened for them with a Wanderguard on, but since then, the Administrator had fixed things up, the alarm now sounded if a resident was near the door with a Wanderguard. Telephone interview on 07/17/2023 at 1:42 p.m. with S8 CNA revealed she worked on Hall W the night Resident #1 left the facility. S8 CNA stated she was in another resident's room on Hall W at the time the event occurred. S8 CNA stated she did not hear an alarm go off. S8 CNA stated she heard the police officer beating on the door at the end of Hall W, and the officer had Resident #1 with her. S8 CNA stated she saw Resident #1 in the living room of the facility about 10 minutes before the police arrived with Resident #1. S8 CNA stated that when Resident #1 returned, she kept yelling out an address that she wanted to go to. Interview on 07/17/2023 at 2:17 p.m. with S10 Maintenance revealed he did no actual monitoring of the alarms on the facility doors, but was contacted if there was a problem. S10 Maintenance stated he was not aware of how the Wanderguard alarm functioned if the code was put in and the door was opened. Interview on 07/18/2023 at 8:30 a.m. with S1 Administrator revealed the alarm system had alarm tones which were different if a resident was loitering (near the door), or if the exit doors were opened. S1 Administrator stated the special tones were initiated after the incident with Resident #2 on 06/04/2023. Observation beginning on 07/18/2023 at 8:30 a.m. revealed S2 LPN placed a Wanderguard on her ankle, went to the front door of the facility, and demonstrated the alarm for a loitering resident. The alarm sounded. At this time, the surveyor went into a resident's room on Hall W which was 4 doors down from the exit door, and shut the door. The loitering alarm could not be heard. S2 LPN was then asked by the surveyor to open the exit door of the facility on Hall W, and the alarm sounded. At 8:34 a.m., the surveyor and S9 CNA went into a resident's room on Hall W and closed the door. The surveyor and S9 CNA were unable to hear the exit alarm when the door to a room on Hall W was closed. S9 CNA confirmed she was unable to hear the alarm. Interview on 07/18/2023 at 8:36 a.m. with S1 Administrator confirmed she was unable to hear the exit alarm from a resident's room on Hall W when the door was closed. S1 Administrator stated she did not investigate this issue after the incident on 05/17/2023, because a CNA reported that she heard the alarm. S1 Administrator stated she did not know how this issue could be resolved without having alarms in each room. S1 Administrator confirmed that residents are still at risk for elopement due to inability of staff to hear alarms. Interview on 07/18/2023 at 12:25 p.m. with S1 Administrator revealed there was no documented education given to employees concerning response to the facility alarm system before or after the 05/17/2023 incident. Resident #2 Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Unspecified Dementia, Hyperlipidemia, Major Depressive Disorder and Essential Hypertension. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/17/2023 revealed BIMS of 6, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #2 required one-person physical assist with personal hygiene, toilet use and dressing; and supervision with locomotion on and off the unit. Resident #2 was coded for behaviors of wandering. Review of Resident #2's Care plan with a review date of 08/17/2023 revealed in part . Elopement: potential for elopement r/t current diagnosis Dementia - Plan 1. Redirect and reorient as needed. 4. Monitor and document visual census. Review of Resident #2's 07/2023 Physician Orders read in part . 06/04/2023 - Wanderguard with census checks Q1 hour. 03/06/2023 - Wanderguard Transmitter test every day. Review of Resident #2's Risk of Elopement/Wandering assessment read in part . 05/17/2023 - Resident is at risk for elopement/wandering, as evidence by: wanders hallways and verbalizes I need to get out of here on occasion. Continue with Wanderguard with census checks Q2 hours. 06/04/2023- Resident is at risk for elopement /wandering, as evidence by: Resident eloped from facility x 1. Continue with Wanderguard with census checks Q1hour after Q 30 minute checks x 24 hours. Appropriate interventions have been reviewed and modified: personal safety alarm devices, exit and stairwell alarms, frequent monitoring, staff aware or residents wander risk. Plan of care updated. Review of the facility's Investigation Report revealed on 06/04/2023 at 8:10 a.m., S3 RN received a telephone call from a local convenience store that a female resident was at their store under the protection of a local deputy. Resident #2 was then picked up from the convenience store by facility staff, and brought back to the facility at 8:20 a.m. where she was immediately assessed with no injuries noted. An interview on 07/18/2023 at 9:10 a.m. with S3 RN revealed that she worked as the weekend Registered Nurse and Treatment Nurse on 06/04/2023. S3 RN stated when she arrived to work on 06/04/2023 at 5:30 a.m., she noticed Resident #2 sitting in a chair in the lobby near the front door. S3 RN stated she put the code in the front door and was able to open the door. S3 RN stated she felt the door may have been malfunctioning because of how close Resident #2 was sitting to the door without alarming when she entered the building. S3 RN stated she told S11 LPN that she felt there was an issue with the door, and S11 LPN reset the door. Afterwards, S3 RN assisted Resident #2 to the door and the door alarm lights blinked indicating proper function. S3 RN stated that around 8:00 a.m. she went back to the nurses' station after passing medications, and noticed the front door was not closed properly and the alarm was not sounding. S3 RN stated she opened the front door and looked around outside to if there was anyone outside, but she didn't see anyone. S3 RN stated she then notified staff to do a census check to make sure all residents were accounted for. S3 RN revealed at 8:10 a.m., a clerk/employee from a local convenience store called and notified them that they believed they had one of their residents there. S3 RN stated she went to the store and picked up Resident #2, and once they got her back into the building, the door alarm went off. S3 RN stated that Resident #2 was assessed after she was brought back into the facility, and family and facility MD was notified. S3 RN revealed S1 Administrator was notified of the incident and Resident #2 was then placed on 1:1 observation. S3 RN revealed that if there were any issues with the door alarm system, staff were told they were to notify S1 Administrator. S3 RN stated that S1 administrator was not notified of a door malfunction until after Resident #2 eloped from the building. An interview on 07/18/2023 at 10:00 a.m. with S1 Administrator revealed that she was notified on 06/04/2023 at 8:15 am that Resident #2 had eloped. S1 Administrator stated that S11 LPN informed her of a potential issue with the door when she called to notify her that Resident #2 had eloped. S1 Administrator stated that once she got to the facility, she investigated and noted that there were no issues with the door lock or alarm at that time. S1 Administrator stated there was no routine maintenance for the alarm system, and that the door alarm system company only came out when they were called. An interview on 07/19/2023 10:45 a.m. with S11 LPN revealed that she worked the day Resident #2 eloped. S11 LPN stated a few minutes before 8:00 a.m., she saw Resident #2 in the hallways and Resident #2 was upset because she saw a little boy in the facility that she thought he was her son, and wanted him to go with her. S11 LPN stated Resident#2 was redirected and then went to the dining room. S11 LPN stated she continued with her medication pass. S11 LPN revealed that at 8:10 a.m., she was notified by a staff member that a resident had eloped, and was at a local convenience store. S11 LPN denied hearing an alarm sound the morning prior to the elopement. S11 LPN stated on the morning of 06/04/2023, there was a resident (unsure which one) was able to get close to the front door without it alarming, so she used a key to reset the door alarm system to ensure that it functioned properly. S11 LPN stated that on 06/04/2023 at 2:00 p.m., she notified S1 Administrator that she did not feel the front door was functioning as it should, and S1 Administrator initiated a door watch at that time. S11 LPN revealed that she did not notify S1 Administrator of a door malfunction prior to the elopement that took place on 06/04/2023. Interview on 07/18/2023 at 12:25 p.m. with S1 Administrator revealed the Elopement policy was used as education for the in-service given after Resident #1 eloped from the facility. S1 Administrator confirmed there was no information concerning responding to facility alarms. An Interview on 07/19/2023 at 2:25 p.m. with S1 Administrator revealed that she should be notified immediately if there are any issues with the function of the doors. S1 Administrator stated she was unaware a key had been used to reset the door alarm on the morning of 06/04/2023. S1 Administrator confirmed that staff should have notified her prior to Resident #2's elopement on the morning of 06/04/2023, when they felt there was an issue with the front door, and they did not.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 residents (#1 and #2) in a sample of 5 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) reviewed for elopement. The facility's Administration failed to: 1. Ensure supervision was increased for residents at risk for elopement when staff became aware of improper functioning of door alarms and doors; 2. Ensure an effective system of staff response was in place when the door alarm sounded; and 3. Ensure staff were effectively trained and knowledgeable of their system of response, and adhered to training. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 05/17/2023 at 6:15 p.m., when Resident #1 who had a diagnosis of Dementia, exhibited exit seeking behaviors and wore a Wanderguard bracelet, exited the facility after the door exit alarm. Resident #1 was found by local police at 6:30 p.m. near a busy four lane highway that runs parallel to the facility. The facility's continued failure to identify potential system failures and respond appropriately, resulted in the immediate jeopardy continuing on 06/04/2023 at 8:00 a.m., when Resident #2 who had a diagnosis of Dementia, exhibited exit seeking behaviors and wore a Wanderguard bracelet, exited the facility, although staff were aware of a previous door malfunction, walked alongside a busy four lane highway, crossed a two lane highway that intersected the four lane highway, and was found at a convenience store by store staff 0.2 miles away. S1Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation on 07/18/2023 at 3:21 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy situation was removed on 07/19/2023 at 5:00 p.m. when an acceptable plan of removal was presented. The facility's plan to remove the immediate jeopardy situation included the following: Summary of Events: On July 1, 2023 at 3:21 p.m. the Administrator was notified of an Immediate Jeopardy situation for the facility's administration failure to implement a system to provide supervision to prevent elopement. An Immediate Jeopardy Template was provided at this time. The following actions were implemented immediately: On 07/18/2023 at 4:00 p.m., an operational check was completed on all exit doors by Medical Equipment Company staff to evaluate the current operation status of the magnetic door locking system. The volume was increased on Hall W exit door. Door codes were also changed on 07/18/2023 by Medical Equipment Company staff. On 07/18/2023 at 4:30 p.m., an assigned employee was placed at the nurse's station as a Door Watch across all shifts to monitor the facility Wanderguard annunciator panel to ensure the resident's safety and well-being. Door Watch staff will be in-serviced by the Administrator/Designee on required duties prior to assuming the Door Watch assignment. Door alarm monitoring will be documented every 30 minutes by assigned staff. The Administrator/Designee will monitor the door watch documentation 5 times weekly for 4 weeks to ensure no further issues have occurred. The Elopement Risk Binder was reviewed on 07/18/2023 by the Director of Nursing to ensure the binder information is current. The Elopement Risk Binder will be updated by the MDS staff when a resident is identified with changes in cognition. On 07/19/2023 at 4:10 p.m. Administration was in-serviced by VP of Operations on Policies and Procedures for Elopement to include prevention of elopement and interventions if an elopement occurs. On 07/19/2023 at 4:15 p.m. Administration was in-serviced by VP of Operations on Supervision of Residents at Risk for Elopement. VP of Operations will ensure Administration/Designee monitors resident elopement risks by auditing risk documentation weekly x 4 weeks. Resident Specific Actions: Wanderguard bracelet for Residents #1586, #1596. #1604, #1607 and #1619 were checked on 07/18/2023 to ensure proper working order. Residents that have been identified as elopement risk will be monitored by Administrative/Designee or nursing staff every 15 minutes for 7 days, then every 30 minutes for 7 days, then every hour continuously. The Administrator/Designee will monitor elopement risk documentation 5 times a week for 4 weeks. The Elopement Risk Binder was reviewed on 07/18/2023 by the Director of Nursing to ensure the binder information is current. The Elopement Risk Binder will be updated by the MDS staff when a resident is identified with changes in cognition and if there are new admissions to the facility that meet the criteria for elopement risk and require a Wanderguard bracelet. The binder will be reviewed by the Director of Nursing/Designee weekly to ensure continued accuracy. QAPI: On 07/19/2023 at 9:00 a.m. the QAPI Committee met to review and conduct a Root Cause Analysis and review policies and procedures for possible changes. A QAPI Performance Improvement Project will be implemented to review all corrective actions. All findings will be discussed at the monthly QAA meeting for a minimum of 3 months and quarterly thereafter for continued compliance and further interventions if needed. Education of all staff by the Administrator/Designee on residents at risk for elopement and proper monitoring of those residents and current residents at risk for elopement began immediately on 07/18/2023 and will be completed on 07/19/2023. Education will be continued monthly for 1 month. Upon hire employees will be educated on the Elopement and Wandering Residents Policy and annually thereafter unless such actions occur again. The QA Committee will supervise staff education to ensure all staff is properly educated and compliant. On 07/19/2023 the Administrator completed a reconciliation of the required Elopement and Wandering Residents education. No current employee or new will be allowed to work until staff education of Elopement and Residents Policy has been completed. Estimated completion date of 07/19/2023. For the remainder of this document Resident #1 is #1619, Resident #2 is #1586, Resident #3 is #1607, Resident #4 is #1596, and Resident #5 is #1604. This deficient practice continues at a potential for more than minimal harm for all 5 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) assessed as being at risk for elopement, have exit seeking behaviors, and wore Wanderguard alert bracelets. Findings: Cross refer to F689. Review of the facility Elopement policy revealed the following in part . Policy Statement: Please contact 911. Review of the Elopement policy revealed no information regarding prevention of elopement, or what to do if a door alarm goes off. Interview on 07/18/2023 at 8:30 a.m. with S1 Administrator revealed the alarm system had alarm tones which were different if a resident was loitering near the door, or if the exit doors were open. S1 Administrator stated the special tones were initiated after the incident with Resident #2 on 06/04/2023. Interview on 07/18/2023 at 8:36 a.m. with S1 Administrator confirmed she was unable to hear the exit alarm from a resident's room on Hall W when the door was closed. S1 Administrator stated she did not investigate this issue after the incident on 05/17/2023, because a CNA reported that she heard the alarm. S1 Administrator stated she did not know how this issue could be resolved without having alarms in each room. S1 Administrator confirmed that residents were still at risk for elopement due to inability of staff to hear alarms. An interview on 07/18/2023 at 9:10 a.m. with S3 RN revealed that she worked as the weekend Registered Nurse and Treatment Nurse on 06/04/2023. S3 RN stated when she arrived to work on 06/04/2023 at 5:30 a.m., she noticed Resident #2 sitting in a chair in the lobby near the front door. S3 RN stated she put the code in the front door and was able to open the door. S3 RN stated she felt the door may have been malfunctioning because of how close Resident #2 was sitting to the door without alarming when she entered the building. S3 RN stated she told S11 LPN that she felt there was an issue with the door and S11 LPN reset the door. S3 RN stated that around 8:00 a.m. she went back to the nurses' station after passing medications, and noticed the front door was not closed properly and the alarm was not sounding. S3 RN stated she opened the front door and looked around outside to if there was anyone outside, but she didn't see anyone. S3 RN stated she then notified staff to do a census check to make sure all residents were accounted for. S3 RN revealed at 8:10 a.m., a clerk/employee from a local convenience store called and notified them that they believed they had one of their residents there. S3 RN stated she went to the store and picked up Resident #2, and once they got her back into the building the door alarm went off. S3 RN stated that Resident #2 was assessed after she was brought back into the facility and family and facility MD was notified. S3 RN revealed S1 Administrator was notified of the incident and Resident #2 was then placed on 1:1 observation. S3 RN revealed that if there were any issues with the door alarm system, staff were told to notify S1 Administrator. S3 RN stated that S1 administrator was not notified of a door malfunction until after Resident #2 eloped from the building. An interview on 07/18/2023 at 10:00 a.m. with S1 Administrator revealed that she was notified on 06/04/2023 at 8:15 am that Resident #2 had eloped. S1 Administrator stated that S11 LPN informed her of a potential issue with the door when she called to notify her that Resident #2 had eloped. S1 Administrator stated that once she got to the facility, she investigated and noted that there were no issues with the door lock or alarm at that time. S1 Administrator stated there was no routine maintenance for the alarm system, and that the door alarm system company only came out when they were called. Interview on 07/18/2023 at 12:25 p.m. with S1 Administrator revealed the Elopement policy was used as education for the in-service given after Resident #1 eloped from the facility. S1 Administrator confirmed there was no information concerning responding to facility alarms. S1 Administrator confirmed there was no documented education given to employees concerning response to the facility alarm system before or after the 05/17/2023 incident. An interview on 07/19/2023 at 2:25 p.m. with S1 Administrator revealed that she should be notified immediately if there are any issues with the function of the doors. S1 Administrator stated she was unaware a key had been used to reset the door alarm on the morning of 06/04/2023. S1 Administrator confirmed that staff should have notified her prior to Resident #2's elopement on the morning of 06/04/2023, when they felt there was an issue with the front door, and they did not.
May 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure a Resident was treated with respect and dignity ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure a Resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promotes enhancement of his or her own quality of life. The Facility failed to ensure a Resident's urinary catheter drainage bag was covered to ensure privacy for 1 (Resident #104) of 2 (Resident #104 and Resident #31) Resident's reviewed for dignity in a total sample of 15. Findings: Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed an admit date of 06/21/2022 with diagnoses which included: Neurogenic Bladder, Heart Failure, Unspecified Dementia, Anemia and Pain. Review of Resident #104's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/03/2023 revealed resident had a BIMS score of 15 (indicating intact cognition) and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #104's care plan with a review date of 07/01/2023 revealed a potential for Urinary Tract Infections and trauma related to Foley catheter with approaches for catheter care as ordered. Observation on 05/15/2023 at 9:26 a.m. from the hallway revealed Resident #104 was awake in bed. A Foley catheter bag was observed hanging from the left side of the resident's bed frame. There was no privacy bag over the Urinary catheter drainage bag that contained approximately 400 milliliters of yellow urine. Observation on 05/16/2023 at 10:47 a.m. from the hallway revealed Resident #104 was awake and seated in a reclining Geri-[NAME] in her room. A Foley catheter Urinary drainage bag was hanging from the right side of the Geri-chair. There was no privacy bag covering the Urinary catheter drainage bag which contained approximately 300-400 milliliters of yellow urine. Observation and interview on 05/16/2023 at 10:47 a.m. of Resident #104 accompanied by S2 DON confirmed that Resident #104's Foley catheter urinary drainage bag with urine in it, was not covered and was visible from the hallway. S2 DON confirmed Resident #104's Foley catheter drainage bag should have been in a privacy bag and it was not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview the facility failed to make efforts to document and resolve grievances for 1 (#42) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for grievances out of a total of 15 sampled residents. Findings: ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview the facility failed to make efforts to document and resolve grievances for 1 (#42) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for grievances out of a total of 15 sampled residents. Findings: In an interview on 05/15/2023 at 12:10 p.m. Resident #42 revealed that she refused to use her shared bathroom because the resident in the joining room would make the bathroom dirty by smearing feces on the toilet seat and leaving towels and toilet paper on the floor. Resident #42 stated that she used the bedside commode in her room and would use sanitary wipes to clean her hands before meals. Resident #42 stated that she had notified several staff members but nothing had changed. Resident #42 stated that staff had never offered a room change. In an interview on 05/15/2023 at 3:50 p.m. with S3 Social Worker revealed that she was aware that Resident #42 did not use her bathroom with the complaint of it often being dirty. S3 Social Worker stated that management staff was aware of the resident's complaint and stated that Resident #42 was offered to be moved to another room with a private bathroom but she refused. In an interview on 05/16/2023 at 11:20 a.m. S1 Administrator stated that she was never notified of any issues with Resident #42's bathroom. S1 Administrator stated that she kept a note book of grievances/complaints but she did not have a written grievance on the issues Resident #42 was having with her bathroom. In an interview on 05/16/2023 at 12:45 p.m. S1 Administrator stated that she spoke with Resident #42 and she revealed that she would like to change rooms to have a private bathroom. S1 Administrator stated she would accommodate Resident #42 once there was an open room and that she had notified housekeeping staff and would ensure that Resident #42's current bathroom would stay clean.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to maintain acceptable holding temperatures for pureed foods during meal service. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 7 Residents that received pureed meals prepared by the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Preparation and Service read in part . 4. Food will be served at acceptable temperatures, each type of food having an appropriate service temperature. 14. Food will be placed on the steam table to maintain acceptable temperatures during meal service. Review of the facility's policy titled Acceptable holding temperatures for foods read in part . Pureed foods 140-150 degrees Fahrenheit. Observation of the kitchen on 05/15/2023 at 10:30 a.m. revealed S4 Dietary [NAME] performed temperature checks for food items on the steam table to be served for lunch. The temperature checks for pureed food items revealed unacceptable temperatures. Pureed pork holding temperature was 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Pureed carrots was 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Pureed mustard greens was 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview on 05/15/2023 at 10:40 a.m. with S4 Dietary [NAME] revealed she was responsible for preparing food items, placing food items on the steam table, and obtaining temperature checks. S4 Dietary [NAME] stated the food items had been on the steam table for about 30 minutes. S4 Dietary [NAME] stated she was unaware of what food holding temperatures were supposed to be, and she had not received training related to food temperature checks. Observation of the kitchen on 05/15/2023 at 11:00 a.m. revealed S3 Social Worker, whom was responsible for Dietary Manager duties at the time of survey, performed temperature checks for pureed food items on steam table. The temperature checks for pureed food items revealed unacceptable temperatures. Pureed pork holding temperature was 130 degrees Fahrenheit. Pureed carrots holding temperature was 130 degrees Fahrenheit. Pureed mustard greens was 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Interview on 05/15/2023 at 11:05 a.m. with S3 Social Worker revealed the pureed food items were out of acceptable holding temperature range, and they should have been.
Jun 2022 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, by failing to ensure blinds did not have missing and bent blades and were functioni...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, by failing to ensure blinds did not have missing and bent blades and were functioning properly in Room A. Total sample size 21. Findings: Observation of Room A on 06/06/2022 at 10:23 a.m., revealed a pair of window blinds with missing and bent blades. One blind was noted to be up and not able to be lowered and the other blind was noted not to be down and not able to be raised up. Interview with Resident #9 at the time of the observation revealed the blinds were not able to be lowered and she was not happy about that. Observation of Room A on 06/07/2022 at 9:00 a.m., revealed a pair of window blinds with missing and bent blades. One blind was noted to be up and not able to be lowered and the other blind was noted not to be down and not able to be raised up Observation with S1 DON in Room A on 06/07/2022 at 9:40 a.m. confirmed that the blinds were broken and needed to be replaced.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #42 Review of Resident #42's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/21/2022 with admitting diagnoses that incl...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #42 Review of Resident #42's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/21/2022 with admitting diagnoses that include Gastrostomy Status, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Candidal Stomatitis, PVD, GERD and N/V. Review of Resident #42's clinical record of hospital transfers revealed the following hospitalization stays: 01/10/2022 through 01/27/2022 03/13/2022 through 03/29/2022 03/31/2022 through 04/05/2022 04/18/2022 through 04/21/2022 Further review revealed transfers to the Emergency department with same day return on 12/03/2021, 12/06/2021, 01/02/2022 and 05/25/2022. Review of the facility's Emergency Transfers log revealed no documentation that the ombudsman had been notified of Resident #42's hospitalizations stays/same day return transfers on the above dates. Resident #45 Review of Resident #45's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/7/2020 with admitting diagnoses that included Type 2 DM, Essential Primary Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Edema and COPD. Further review of Resident #45's record revealed Resident #45 was hospitalized on [DATE] through 05/01/2022. Review of the facility's record of Emergency Transfer log revealed no documentation that the ombudsman had been notified of Resident #45's hospitalization on 04/19/2022 through 05/01/2022. Interview on 06/08/2022 at 12:24 p.m. with S1 ADM stated the last notification of resident transfers/discharges to the ombudsman was in October 2021. S1 ADM confirmed monthly notifications of resident transfers and discharges should have been sent to the Ombudsman and had not been. Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman in writing of resident transfers to the hospital for 3 (#35, #42, and #45) of 4 (#35, #40, #42, and #45) residents reviewed for hospitalization in a total sample of 21 residents. Findings: Resident #35 Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnoses that included: COPD, Hyperlipidemia, Allergic Rhinitis Insomnia, GERD, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Pain Unspecified, Type 2 DM, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. Further review revealed Resident #35's most recent hospital stay was from 04/16/2022 to 04/21/2022. Review of Resident #35's record revealed no documentation that the ombudsman had been notified of Resident #35's hospitalization from 04/16/2022 through 04//21/2022. Interview on 06/08/2022 at 12:24 p.m. with S1 ADM revealed the facility's last documented notification to the Ombudsman was in October 2021. S1 ADM. stated that S11 SSD was responsible for notifying the Ombudsman of transfers and/or discharges. S1 ADM revealed that S4 SSD was newly appointed and she (S1ADM) had failed to inform her that she would be responsible for Ombudsman notifications. S1 ADM confirmed the Ombudsman had not been notified of hospital transfers/discharge for Residents #35, #42, and #45 and should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #299) of 1 sampled Resident who was a smoker. Findings: Revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #299) of 1 sampled Resident who was a smoker. Findings: Review of Resident #299's Face Sheet revealed an admit date of 03/12/2021 with the following diagnoses including COPD and heart failure. Review of Resident #299's 01/2022 - 06/2022 Nurse Notes revealed the resident was a smoker. Review of Resident #299's Care Plan with target date of 06/25/2022 revealed no documentation that Resident #299 was care planned as a smoker. Review of Resident #299's 03/23/2022 Safe Smoking Assessment revealed the resident required frequent supervision, Review of the Facility's Resident Smoking policy revealed the following in part: 10. All safe smoking measures will be documented on each resident's care plan and communicated to all staff, visitors, and volunteers who will be responsible for supervising residents while smoking. Supervision will be provided as indicate on each resident's care plan. Interview on 06/07/2022 at 12:50 p.m. with S3 LPN confirmed Resident #299 was not care planned for smoking. She stated that she accidently omitted smoking on his updated care plan which had a current review date of 03/24/2022 and a next review date of 06/25/2022.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 3 (Resident #9, Resident #22 and Resident #45) of 3 residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 3 (Resident #9, Resident #22 and Resident #45) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly changed, labeled and stored. Findings: Facility's Policy on Oxygen Administration read in part . 5. Change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated. 5. Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. Resident #22 Record review of Resident #22's Medical Record revealed the resident had a diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure and received oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula. Observation on 06/06/2022 at 9:35 a.m. revealed Resident #22 in bed with oxygen on via nasal cannula plugged into an oxygen concentrator. Oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle was undated. Observation and interview on 06/07/2022 at 8:21 a.m. revealed Resident #22's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle was undated. Resident #22 stated she was not sure when the oxygen tubing had been changed. Observation and interview on 06/07/2022 at 8:31 a.m. with S4 LPN in Resident #22's room confirmed Resident #22's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle was undated and it should have been. S4 LPN stated respiratory equipment is changed every Friday. Resident #9 Review of the Facility's Policy/Procedure titled Nebulizer Therapy reads in part: Care of the Equipment: 1. Clean after each use. 3. Disassemble parts after every treatment. 4. Rinse the nebulizer cup and mouthpiece with sterile or distilled water. 7. Once completely dry, store the nebulizer cup and mouthpiece in a zip lock bag. 8. Change nebulizer tubing every 2 weeks. Observation on 06/06/2022 at 10:23 a.m. revealed Resident #9 lying in bed with supplemental oxygen in progress at 1.5 LPM (liters per minutes). Further observation revealed a nebulizer cup and mouth piece attached to tubing and a nebulizer machine were undated and open to air on Resident #9's over bed table. Observation on 06/06/2022 at 3:00 p.m. revealed Resident #9 lying in bed with supplemental oxygen in progress at 1.5 LPM (liters per minutes) via nasal cannula. Further observation revealed an aerosol mask attached to tubing and a nebulizer machine were undated and open to air on Resident #9's over bed table. Observation and interview on 06/07/2022 at 9:40 a.m. with S1 DON confirmed that the nebulizer tubing, cup, and mouthpiece should have been labeled and stored in a plastic bag and they were not. Resident #45 Observation on 06/07/2022 at 07:19 a.m. of Resident #45 revealed resident awake, lying in bed with head of bed elevated. Observation of nebulizer with oxygen tubing, mask and mouthpiece revealed they were not labeled with a date and were left open to air. Observation on 06/08/2022 at 09:16 a.m. in Resident #45's room of nebulizer machine with oxygen tubing, mask and mouthpiece open to air and without a date labeled. Interview on 06/08/2022 at 09:25 a.m. with S5 CNA stated Resident #45's nebulizer tubing, mask and mouthpiece were dirty, not labeled and were not stored properly. Interview on 06/08/2022 at 09:31 a.m. with S2 DON stated the Treatment nurse was responsible for changing all respiratory tubing and equipment every Friday. S2 DON confirmed with S4 LPN that Resident #45's nebulizer oxygen tubing, mask and mouthpiece were not labeled with a date and was not stored properly. Review of Resident #45's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/7/2020 with admitting diagnoses that included Type 2 DM, Essential Primary Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Edema and COPD. Review of Resident #45's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 12/7/2020 for Budesonide 0.5mg/2ml suspension 1 unit inhale orally via nebulizer bid related to COPD. Do not mix with any other nebulizer solution. Rinse mouth after each use. Review of Resident #45's Care Plan with target date of 8/14/2022 revealed a potential for respiratory difficulties with goal for minimal respiratory problems. Plan included to monitor respiratory status and notify md of increased respiratory compromise such as increased sob, cyanosis, mental confusion, provide comfort measures for respiratory discomfort (elevate head of bed, maintain cool temp), administer medications as indicated and monitor oxygen saturation and deliver oxygen as indicated. Review of the facility's Nebulizer Therapy policy dated 1/3/2022 revealed Care of Equipment: Clean after each use, wash hands before handling equipment, disassemble parts after every treatment, rinse the neb cup and mouthpiece with sterile or distilled water, shake off excess water, air dry on absorbent towel, once completely dry, store the nebulizer cup and mouthpiece in a zip lock bag, change nebulizer tubing every 2 weeks and periodically disinfect unit per manufacturer's recommendations.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that expired medications /biologicals were not available for use/administration to residents on 1 of 2 medication carts. Findings: Obse...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that expired medications /biologicals were not available for use/administration to residents on 1 of 2 medication carts. Findings: Observation on 06/07/2022 at 9:15 a.m. of D Hall medication cart accompanied by S6 LPN revealed the following items on the medication cart for use: one bottle of Aspirin 325mg enteric coated tablets Lot# P117000 with expiration date 03/2022, one bottle of Aspirin EC 325mg tablets Lot# P120438 with expiration dated 05/2022, and one bottle of Zinc sulfate 220mg tablets Lot# 194564 with expiration dated 02/2022. Interview with S6 LPN at the time of the above observation confirmed that two bottles of aspirin 325 mg enteric coated tablets and one bottle of zinc sulfate 220 mg tablets were expired and should have pulled from the medicine cart and properly disposed. Interview on 06/07/2022 at 9:21 a.m. with S2 DON confirmed the above findings. S2 DON revealed that the staff nurses should be checking the expiration dates on medications on the medication carts routinely and had not been. S2 DON confirmed the bottles of expired medications should have been discarded. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy in part revealed the medication room and medication carts are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist and nursing staff for discontinued, outdated, defective, or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible, or missing label.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0888 (Tag F0888)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to follow infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of COVID-19. The facility failed to develop a policy that incl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to follow infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of COVID-19. The facility failed to develop a policy that included additional measures for unvaccinated staff and failed to ensure unvaccinated employees wore N95 or higher level mask while in the facility for 3 (S8 LPN, S9 Hospice CNA and S10 CNA) of 3 unvaccinated staff observations. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled: Employee COVID-19 Vaccination Exemption revealed in part . Compliance Guidance 1. Employees granted exemptions will be subject to additional precautions to mitigate the transmission and spread of COVID-19 to include; wearing a mask (KN95 masks, as available, during an outbreak), testing per CDC guidelines per parish COVID-19 level of community transmission. Review of the facility policy titled: COVID-19 Vaccination Policy and Procedure revealed in part . Additional Precautions and Contingency Plans for Unvaccinated Staff 1. Staff who receive an exemption to the COVID-19 vaccine will be subject to additional precautions to mitigate the transmission and spread of COVID-19, which includes: Wearing a mask. KN95 masks (as available) when there is an outbreak. Testing per CDC guidelines per Parish COVID-19 Level of Community Transmission. Observation on 06/06/2022 at 9:23 a.m. revealed S8 LPN preparing medications at a medicine cart while wearing a blue surgical mask. Interview at that time revealed she had not received the COVID-19 vaccine and had a qualifying exemption. S8 LPN was tested weekly for COVID-19 and was not aware of any other measures for unvaccinated staff. Observation on 06/06/2022 at 10:20 a.m. revealed S9 Hospice CNA exiting the facility's soiled utility room. The CNA was observed wearing a blue surgical mask. Interview at that time revealed she saw residents in the facility 5 days a week. She stated she had not received the COVID vaccine and had a qualifying exemption through her employer. S9 Hospice CNA stated she was tested for COVID-19 twice a week and was required to wear a surgical mask only. Observation on 06/06/2022 at 10:22 a.m. revealed S10 CNA exiting a resident's room wearing a blue surgical mask. Interview at that time revealed she had been hired in August. She stated she had not received the COVID vaccine and was tested twice a week for COVID 19. S10 CNA stated she was screened before each shift and received a new mask daily. She stated she was not required to wear a KN95 or higher level mask at this time. Interview on 06/06/2022 at 1:51 p.m. with S7 ADON revealed unvaccinated staff were not required to wear a higher level mask such as KN95 at this time and should be. She stated the only measures being taken at this time for unvaccinated staff was wearing surgical mask and being tested according to community transmission rate requirements. Interview on 06/06/2022 at 2:30 p.m. with S2 DON confirmed unvaccinated staff were not required to wear a higher level face mask at this time. S2 DON stated additional precautions for unvaccinated staff in the facility policies stated KN95 mask would only be used during an outbreak and was a facility wide practice. Further interview revealed staff would be tested according to CDC guidelines per level of community transmission. When asked, S2 DON confirmed there were no additional precautions in place for unvaccinated staff at this time.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 26 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $13,020 in fines. Above average for Louisiana. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade F (14/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 14/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock Staffed?

CMS rates LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock?

State health inspectors documented 26 deficiencies at LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 24 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock?

LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 103 certified beds and approximately 84 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in POLLOCK, Louisiana.

How Does Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock Stick Around?

LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock Ever Fined?

LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK has been fined $13,020 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Louisiana average of $33,209. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Pollock on Any Federal Watch List?

LEGACY NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF POLLOCK is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.