Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab

1400 Lindberg Drive, Slidell, LA 70458 (985) 641-4985
For profit - Limited Liability company 110 Beds VOLARE HEALTH Data: November 2025 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
Last Inspection: July 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and a poor reputation among nursing homes. It ranks at the bottom in both Louisiana and St. Tammany County, suggesting there are no better local options available. The facility appears to be improving slightly, as issues decreased from 16 in 2024 to 13 in 2025, but they still have a troubling record with $577,803 in fines, which is higher than 99% of facilities in the state. While staffing is a relative strength with more RN coverage than 92% of Louisiana facilities and a turnover rate below the state average, critical incidents raise alarms. For example, the nursing staff failed to administer medications as ordered for several residents, leading to an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one resident who missed essential doses of medication for a serious wound infection. Overall, while there are some positives, the facility's poor grades and serious deficiencies warrant careful consideration.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Louisiana
#112/223
Top 50%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
16 → 13 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$577,803 in fines. Lower than most Louisiana facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
50 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Overall Rating
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Staff Levels
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Care Quality
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 16 issues
2025: 13 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 46%

Near Louisiana avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $577,803

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: VOLARE HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 50 deficiencies on record

6 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Jul 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out Activ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility failed to provide nail care for 1 (#46) of 18 residents observed for ADL's in the final sample. Findings: Review of the policy titled, Quality of Life, Activities of Daily Living /Maintain Abilities dated 03/2023 revealed the following: Purpose: Facility provides necessary care and services to support the resident's needs and choices. Guidelines: 1. A resident is given appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his/her ability to carry out the activities of daily living, including those specified below: a. Hygiene-bathing, grooming, dressing and oral care 2. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the clinical record for Resident #46 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Disorder of the Autonomic Nervous System and Unspecified Lack of Coordination. Review of Resident #46's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/07/2025 revealed he had a BIMS of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #46 was Dependent and required assistance from staff for personal hygiene needs. Review of Resident 46's Care Plan revealed the following: Focus: Requires assistance with ADL's r/t hx of motorcycle accident, neuralgia, need for geri-chair for mobility Intervention: The resident is dependent on staff for personal hygiene and oral care. On 06/30/2025 at 8:45 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #46's fingernails. Resident #46's fingernails were observed to be long, yellow in discoloration with dirt and grime embedded underneath nail. On 07/01/2025 at 9:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #46. He stated he had been asking to have his finger nails trimmed for over a month. He stated having long finger nails sucked and wanted them trimmed. An additional observation was made of Resident #46's nails remained long, yellow in discoloration with dirt and grime embedded underneath nail. He stated he was dependent on staff to assist him with trimming his nails. On 07/02/2025 at 2:53 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5CNA. S5CNA stated he had observed Resident #46's fingernails being long, unclean, and needed to be trimmed 3- 4 days ago. S5CNA denied assisting Resident #46 with nail cleaning and trimming or reporting this observation to anyone. S5CNA confirmed Resident #46 was dependent and required assistance for maintaining personal hygiene needs. On 07/02/2025 at 3:29 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S1IPRN. She described Resident #46's fingernails as being long, yellow in discoloration with dirt and grime underneath nail and in need of being trimmed immediately. She confirmed Resident #46 was dependent on staff to meet his personal hygiene and grooming needs. On 07/02/2025 at 3:30 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S2DON. She described Resident #46's fingernails as being long, yellow in discoloration with dirt and grime underneath nail and in need of being trimmed. She confirmed Resident #46 was dependent on staff to meet his personal hygiene and grooming needs. She stated nursing aides, floor nurse or treatment nurse assisted with maintaining nail care needs for residents. She stated she would expect staff to have identified Resident #46 need for nail care and provide assistance with cleaning and trimming nails and did not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0806 (Tag F0806)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to honor and accommodate resident food allergies, intol...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to honor and accommodate resident food allergies, intolerances, and preferences by failing to ensure a resident received meals that did not include food allergies for 1 (#63) of 2 (#31 and #63) residents reviewed for dietary services. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who consumed meals from the kitchen. Findings: Review of Resident #63's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #63's Allergies in the electronic health record revealed the following: Allergies: Iodine from food, Shellfish derived product Review of Resident #63's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Focus: Resident #63 is allergic to iodine from food, shellfish derived products Interventions: Benadryl as ordered for potential allergic reaction, label medical record with allergy, and notify pharmacy and dietary of allergies. Review of Resident #63's June 2025 Medication Administration Record revealed on 06/29/2025 the resident was administered two 25 mg tablets of Diphenhydramine HCL for allergy related symptoms. Review of Resident #63's Departmental Progress Note dated 06/29/2025 revealed the following, in part: Incident: Resident #63 came out from room and reported being served crab cake despite having a known shellfish allergy. Resident complained of facial tingling and tongue swelling. Interventions: Nurse practitioner was notified and ordered Diphenhydramine 50 mg, administered per order. Resident was monitored closely following administration. Actions taken: Lunch tray was immediately removed. Resident was served a different meal that did not contain shellfish. Dinner tray was double-checked prior to serving to ensure no allergens were present. Outcome: Patient reported no further symptoms. Swelling and tingling resolved. Condition stable. Review of Resident #63's Meal Ticket dated 07/01/2025 revealed the following, in part: Allergies: Shellfish Review of the menu provided by the facility revealed crab cakes were served for lunch on 06/29/2025. On 07/01/2025 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #63. He stated on 06/29/2025 he was served crab cakes for lunch. He stated he has an iodine and shellfish allergy that the facility is aware of. On 07/01/2025 at 1:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DM. She stated the dietary staff were aware of Resident #63's allergy to shellfish and iodine as it is listed on all his tickets and in his chart. She reviewed Resident #63's meal ticket dated 07/01/2025 and confirmed it listed shellfish as an allergy. She confirmed on 06/29/2025 Resident #63 was mistakenly served crab cakes for lunch. She confirmed Resident #63 was served crab cakes and should not have been served it as he had an allergy to shellfish. She confirmed a resident who was allergic to shellfish and whose meal ticket listed shellfish as their allergy should not have been served crab cakes. On 07/01/2025 at 2:21 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S4LPN. She stated she worked on Sunday 06/29/2025 and was the nurse assigned to Resident #63. She confirmed Resident #63 had an allergy to shellfish and was served crab cakes for lunch on 06/29/2025 and should not have been. On 07/02/2025 at 3:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She confirmed a resident who was allergic to shellfish and whose meal ticket listed shellfish as an allergy should not have been served crab cakes. She confirmed residents should not be served any foods they are allergic to.
Feb 2025 4 deficiencies 1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) newly admitted or readmitted residents who needed physician orders for immediate care and/or follow up for surgery and for implanted devices. For 26 days, the facility failed to ensure the admission Nurse, Charge Nurses, Wound Care Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses and Registered Nurses: 1. Had accurately transcribed and clarified Resident #1's 01/24/2025 hospital discharge recommendations, wound care and dressing orders, cardiology follow up for surgical incision care, and monitoring equipment instructions; 2. Understood and acted as needed on their responsibilities for Resident #1's cardiac loop recorder and; 3. Assessed, monitored, documented, and treated Resident #1's surgical incision site, loop recorder, and loop recorder monitoring equipment. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 01/24/2025, when Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital after a surgical implantation of a loop recorder with monitoring equipment. Facility staff failed to accurately transcribe and clarify the resident's discharge orders and complete accurate skin assessments which resulted in Resident #1 not receiving care and treatment for the newly acquired surgical incision site or staff assistance with ensuring the monitoring equipment was functioning from 01/24/2025 through 02/20/2025. This deficient practice created a likelihood Resident #1 would suffer from post-surgical incision site complications and delayed treatment of an arrhythmia identified from the loop recording. S1ADM was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 02/20/2025 at 6:32 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 02/21/2025 at 6:45 p.m., as confirmed by onsite verification through record reviews and interviews. The facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal (POR) prior to survey exit. This deficient practice continued at the potential for more than minimal harm for all 86 residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1. and 2. Review of the manufacture's information and guidelines dated 08/2024 revealed the following information regarding a loop recorder, in part: The Insertable Cardiac Monitor (ICM) is implanted in patient left chest wall under the skin and records subcutaneous Electrocardiogram (ECG) data. The ICM is indicated in patients with a diagnosis of cryptogenic stroke. The ICM works continuously to capture comprehensive and actionable ECG data for up to three years. The ICM automatically-activated monitoring system included ECG data transmission from the ICM, through the patient's monitor, to the cloud network, and then made available to the doctor. The network sends alerts to the doctor of abnormal ECG data. Potential adverse events or potential complications of ICM devices include, but are not limited to, device rejection phenomena (including local tissue reaction), device migration, infection, and erosion through the skin. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessments admission Physician Order for Immediate Care dated 03/2023 revealed the following in part: Purpose: To provide each resident with necessary care and services upon admission. Policy: The facility will have physician orders for the resident's immediate care, at the time of admission. Guidelines: 1. Physician orders for immediate care may be written or verbal. 2. These orders will enable facility staff to provide essential care to the newly admitted resident 3. These orders will be consistent with the resident's physical status. 5. These orders will be in place to facilitate care for the resident until staff can conduct a comprehensive assessment and develop an interdisciplinary care plan. Review of Resident #1's Clinical Records revealed he was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Acute Arterial Ischemic Stroke, Multifocal, and Multiple Vascular Territories. Review of Resident #1's local hospital records dated 01/19/2025 through 01/24/2025 revealed Resident #1's hospital cardiologist implanted a loop recorder on 01/24/2025. Further review revealed the hospital cardiologist MD and NP documented the following, in part: 01/24/2025 Recommend loop recorder implantation for determination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or atrial arrhythmias with Cryptogenic Stroke diagnosis. Recommend outpatient follow-up for wound check in 1 week for a nurse visit and follow-up with cardiology evaluation in about 4 weeks' time. Wound care instructions: May remove outer large clear adhesive in 48 hrs. Encouraged to maintain the white adhesive strip in place until follow-up visit in the office. Do not remove the white adhesive strip. Patient may shower in 24 hours. Apply soap and dab the area dry at insertion site. Encouraged patient to return if this has any discharge or drainage from the incision or if any erythema, fevers or chills noted. Review of Resident #1's After Visit Summary Discharge Instructions Orders (AVS) for Local Hospital admission dated 01/19/2025 through 01/24/2025 revealed discharge instructions for loop recorder: You may shower in 24 hours after the procedure. Allow soapy water to gently run over chest incision, not directly on incision. Do not rub or scrub incision. No bathtubs or submerging in water until site is completely healed. Keep site clean and dry at all times. Inspect site daily for tenderness, discharge, or signs of infection. Apply ice pack for 24 hours. Do not remove the white adhesive strip, allow them to fall off on their own. Further review revealed no cardiologist follow up with the local hospital cardiologist who implanted the loop recorder. Review of Resident #1's hospital cardiologist letter dated 2/21/2025 revealed Resident #1 had loop recorder equipment with instructions to be plugged up beside Resident #1's bed and if power flashes please unplug and plug back in after 5 minutes. Review of Resident #1's Physician Orders from 10/31/2024 through 02/18/2025 revealed no physician's orders addressing Resident #1's surgical incision, cardiology follow up appointment, loop recorder monitoring, or equipment. Review of Resident #1's current Care Plan revealed no evidence a care plan was developed with interventions implemented for a surgical incision to the left chest wall or the loop recorder equipment. Review of Resident #1's Nursing Notes from 01/01/2025 through 02/18/2025 revealed no evidence of Resident #1's surgical incision site, cardiology follow up appointments, or the loop recorder were addressed by staff. Review of Resident #1's Nurse Practitioner Progress notes from 01/01/2025 through 02/18/2025 revealed on 01/25/2025 at 5:40 p.m., S6NP documented loop recorder was placed while inpatient. Resident #1 is discharged to the facility for continued long term care and will follow up with cardiology as scheduled. Staff to request discharge summary. Follow up with cardiology as scheduled. Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record from 01/24/2025 to 02/18/2025, 26 days, revealed no surgical incision site care or the loop recorder equipment monitoring. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/30/2025 revealed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #1 was not coded as having a surgical incision. An observation was made and interview conducted with Resident #1 on 02/17/2025 at 4:45 p.m. A beige piece of medical equipment was visible in the resident's room on the night stand next to the bed and plugged into the wall. Resident #1 lifted his shirt and a white gauze with a small amount of dried maroon colored drainage covered with a large clear adhesive bandage was noted to the left chest wall. There was no date noted on the dressing. Resident #1 stated he was in the hospital recently for a stroke and a loop recorder was put in his chest. Resident #1 stated the doctor at the local hospital told him to plug in the medical equipment for the loop recorder to monitor his heart. Resident #1 stated the medical equipment had been in his room plugged in since his readmission on [DATE]. The resident stated the dressing was applied at the hospital and the facility staff had not removed the dressing since his readmission on [DATE]. He stated the facility staff had not spoken to him about or addressed the surgical incision, loop recorder, or the equipment used to monitor his heart rate since he was readmitted to the facility. An observation was made of Resident #1 on 02/19/2025 at 9:03 a.m. Resident #1 lifted his shirt and a dressing was observed on his left chest wall. The dressing was a white gauze with a small amount of dried maroon drainage covered with a clear adhesive bandage was noted to the left chest wall. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/20/2025 at 12:33 p.m. with S10LPN. S10LPN stated she was responsible for providing the facility with resident's hospital documentation. S10LPN stated she provided the facility with Resident #1's hospital records from 01/20/2025 through 01/22/2025, but did not send the records from 01/23/2025 through 01/24/2025. S10LPN stated she sent the hospital AVS orders via email on 01/24/2025 to S2DON, S11ADON and S9LPN for review, which included the loop recorder discharge instructions. S10LPN stated S2DON, S11DON and S9LPN should have reviewed the AVS orders to ensure further information was not needed. She stated the note from the hospital case manager stated Resident #1's hospital nurse gave report on 01/24/2025 at 4:16 p.m. to the facility nurse so she did not provide the facility with the paperwork from the 23rd or 24th. An interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 4:30 p.m. with S9LPN. S9LPN stated she would assist with completion of resident admission and readmission order entry. She stated the admissions or readmission process was, S10LPN would send an email to dietary, S11ADON, S2DON and herself, which included the AVS orders from the hospital, which they review and follow as orders and instructions from the hospital for residents' care. S9LPN stated from the email received she will print out the AVS and the residents' current physician orders. She stated she will use the residents' current physician order to compare against the AVS and enter new orders or discontinue orders according to the AVS. S9LPN confirmed she did not review part of the AVS titled Local Hospital Facility Transfer Orders, which included the discharge instructions regarding loop recorder incision care. S9LPN confirmed since she failed to review the discharge instructions in the entirety, no orders were entered for Resident #1's loop recorder incision care. After review of Resident's NP Progress Notes, S9LPN stated she did see the S6NP's progress notes on 01/25/2025 during MDS assessment completion, but overlooked the note where loop recorder was placed and the left chest wall incision in the NP's Progress Notes and only looked at the S6NP's plan at the bottom of the note. S9LPN stated the floor nurse who would be receiving Resident #1 for readmission would have received report from the hospital nurse before the resident came to the facility and S9LPN would give a copy of AVS to the admission nurse. S9LPN stated she would have given the copy to S3LPN because he worked on Fridays. S9LPN reviewed Resident #1's electronic health record (EHR) and confirmed Resident #1 did not receive treatment or monitoring for the surgical incision upon readmission to the facility on [DATE] to present. S9LPN confirmed she did not contact the physician to clarify whether incision orders were needed or not. S9LPN stated she was not sure of who the cardiologist was or who had been monitoring the loop recorder. S9LPN confirmed Resident #1 did not have a cardiologist follow up appointment scheduled and should have A telephone interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 12:00 p.m. with S3LPN. S3LPN stated he worked on 01/24/2025 and 01/25/2025 and was responsible for Resident #1's readmission to the facility. S3LPN stated the admission or readmission process for the admission nurse to receive report from the local hospital. S3LPN stated the local hospital will fax an AVS packet over to the facility and those orders from the AVS are entered into the physician orders by S11ADON or whoever is available. S3LPN stated he was responsible to review the AVS orders against the current Physician orders as a check and balance that the AVS orders are entered correctly. S3LPN stated he reviewed Resident #1's AVS paperwork from the hospital on readmission and did not recall discharge loop recorder incision instructions. S3LPN confirmed he did see a new dressing on Resident #1, during readmission and during weekly skin assessments, but he did not assess or remove the dressing. S3LPN stated he assumed wound care was taking care of the incision and dressing. S3LPN confirmed he did not call the physician for dressing or incision order clarifications or notify S2DON or wound care of the new incision. S3LPN stated when residents are admitted or readmitted a full body and skin assessment should be completed by the nurse to assess the skin for wounds, developing wounds or any issues with the resident's skin and document in the residents' EHR. S3LPN confirmed there were no orders or care implemented for Resident #1's surgical incision or monitoring of the loop recorder equipment from 01/24/2025 through 02/17/2025. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 12:34 p.m. with S5LPN. S5LPN stated she cared for Resident #1 on the night shift of 01/24/2025. S5LPN stated she did review the discharge summary instructions for Resident #1, but failed to see discharge instructions for a surgical incision and loop recorder. S5LPN stated the process for the admitting nurse during a resident readmission from the hospital would be to complete a head to toe assessment, which included a full skin assessment and document the assessment in the nursing notes. S5LPN stated during the skin assessment the nurse would check for open areas, bruising, sores and any changes of the skin. S5LPN stated staff receive a copy of a resident's discharge summary instructions for review and a copy is kept at the nurses' station for reference. S5LPN stated she did not receive report of Resident #1 having any new skin wound or incision from S3LPN on the night of 01/24/2025. S5LPN confirmed since she did not receive report of the new incision she had not changed the dressing, completed any monitoring or cared for Resident #1's incision. S5LPN stated Resident #1 did notify her the hospital performed a surgical procedure to insert a device, but she did not report it or investigate further. S5LPN confirmed there were no orders to care for Resident #1's incision or equipment at the bedside. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/20/2025 at 10:46 a.m. with S6NP. S6NP stated she was aware Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility from the local hospital status post loop recorder placement. She stated she requested the nurse, who she could not recall, on 01/25/2025 to contact the hospital and request the AVS orders. S6NP confirmed Resident #1 did not receive care for his left chest wall dressing at the loop recorder insertion site, which caused a likelihood for Resident #1 to develop an infection. S6NP stated Resident #1's incision should have been treated or monitored, and was not. An interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 10:59 a.m. with S4LPN. S4LPN stated she provided care to Resident #1 from 01/24/2025 through 02/19/2025. S4LPN stated she did not receive report from staff or see any documentation in the EHR stating Resident #1 had a surgical wound or monitoring equipment. S4LPN stated after Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE] he informed her he had a dressing, but she was unsure of the date. S4LPN stated she assumed someone was taking care of the dressing, and she did not further investigate the issue. S4LPN stated she observed the dressing to Resident #1's left chest wall. S4LPN confirmed she did not remove the dressing or assess the incision site. S4LPN stated she did not recall reporting the dressing to the wound care nurse, S2DON, or MD/NP. S4LPN stated if she reported the dressing and clarified wound care orders she would have documented this in the nursing notes. S4LPN stated she observed the dressing to Resident #1's left chest wall, but did not provide treatment because she did not have orders. S4LPN stated Resident #1 informed her of the monitoring for the cardiologist, but she did not see any equipment. S4LPN said she did not notify anyone of the dressing, the information about the monitoring equipment, or contact the physician to obtain clarification for treatment. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/20/2025 at 1:01 p.m. with S13WCN2. S13WCN2 stated she was responsible for providing resident wound care from 01/24/2025 through mid-February 2025. S13WCN2 confirmed staff did not report a surgical incision or dressing for Resident #1 nor had she provided any wound care to Resident #1 from 01/24/2025 to 02/17/2025. An interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 11:11 a.m. with S8WCN1. S8WCN1 stated she S8WCN1 stated Resident #1 had no orders for surgical incision care. S8WCN1 confirmed she did not provide any wound care to Resident #1 from her hire date in February 2025 to 02/17/2025. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 9:48 a.m. with S7NP. S7NP confirmed he would expect the nurses to follow the AVS orders received from the hospital. S7NP stated he would expect the nurses to notify the facility's wound care nurse practitioner and wound care nurse, if there were no orders for a wound or incision. He stated he expected the nurse to monitor, as ordered, the incision and immediately report to him and the wound care nurse practitioner any signs and symptoms of decline in the incision, not healing properly and any other issues with the resident and/or incision. An interview was conducted on 02/20/2025 at 10:30 a.m. with S2DON. S2DON stated the admission and readmission process started with S10LPN who emailed the AVS instructions on 01/24/2025. S2DON stated upon Resident #1's readmission the facility received Resident #1's AVS orders via email from S10LPN. S2DON confirmed the email included the document titled local hospital facility transfer orders, which included the loop recorder incision discharge instructions. S2DON confirmed S9LPN was responsible for reviewing Resident #1's AVS and entering orders for resident care. S2DON stated S9LPN should have reviewed the AVS orders in its entirety and entered the loop recorder incision instructions into the EHR and did not. S2DON confirmed staff should have clarified orders with a physician when Resident #1 verbally notified staff of the incision and staff made observations of the incision. S2DON reviewed Resident #1's EHR and verified the resident did not receive care for loop recorder incision, from 01/24/2025 to 02/18/2025, or the subsequent monitoring equipment from 01/24/2025 through 02/20/2025, when the medical director was contacted for instructions. S2DON confirmed the cardiologist was not contacted until 02/19/2025. S2DON stated for Resident #1's readmission dated 01/24/2025 there was no admission evaluation or nursing note and there should have been. After review of Resident #1's EHR, S2DON confirmed there was no documentation regarding Resident #1's incision dressing, treatment, assessment, or monitoring. S2DON stated the progress notes are only monitored by the clinical administrative staff, if they have an adverse event or new orders and not necessarily on a readmission and then the clinical administrative staff will give a brief synapses during the morning meetings to catch up on the resident status as needed. She stated she did not receive report in the morning meetings about a surgical incision, loop recorder monitoring equipment. S2DON confirmed stated she was not aware and had not seen a device/equipment at Resident #1's bedside since readmission. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/24/2025 at 3:46 p.m. with the hospital cardiologist office nurse. She stated the first time they were contacted by the facility was on 02/21/2025, regarding a follow up appointment and requested the loop recorder equipment and incision instructions. She stated she expected the facility to call within a few days of readmission for a cardiologist follow up for an incision check and loop recorder monitoring equipment instructions and did not. After review of AVS orders and hospital medical records regarding loop recorder discharge instructions and follow up, she stated she would have expected the facility to follow the orders. She confirmed the adhesive dressing should have been removed at least 48 hours after the loop recorder was placed and a follow up for skin check by the cardiologist nurse or the nurse at the facility. She confirmed in order for the nurse to assess the incision the large clear adhesive dressing should have been removed to assess the incision, which is a little more than an inch long with white adhesive strips, for redness and drainage at least a week status post loop recorder placement. She stated if Resident #1 had symptoms of atrial fibrillation, they would be alerted and would call the facility to notify them the Resident #1 needed to be seen by the cardiologist. 3. Review of the facility's policy titled, Skin and Wound Management Guidelines undated, revealed the following, in part: Guidelines: Admission/Readmission 1. Staff nurse a. Complete the NSG Admission/readmission Evaluation including a careful evaluation of the skin with thorough and descriptive documentation of any alteration in skin integrity. c. Provide detailed documentation of any alteration in skin integrity in the Progress Notes. d. Obtain and enter treatment order for any identified skin issues. e. Enter into the (TAR), including the following: i. monitoring each shift for presence and condition of dressing, if a dressing is used; ii. daily monitoring for signs of infection or drainage; iii. dressing changes as ordered. 2. Wound Care Nurse a. Review admissions/readmissions and conduct a thorough assessment and documentation of admission, on any wound being monitored. Review of Resident #1's local hospital records dated 01/19/2025 through 01/24/2025 revealed Resident #1's Hospital Cardiologist implanted a loop recorder on 01/24/2025. Review of Resident #1's Physician Orders from 10/31/2024 through 02/18/2025 revealed on 11/01/2024, an order was implemented for Weekly Skin Check - Document results on Weekly Skin Observation Assessment every day shift every 7 days. Review of Resident #1's Skin & Wound-Total Body Skin Assessments dated 01/31/2025, 02/07/2025, and 02/14/2025 revealed normal skin assessments with no new wounds or surgical incisions documented. Further revealed there was no assessment dated [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's Wound Care Evaluations from 10/31/2024 to current revealed no documentation for left chest wall surgical incision treatment, assessment and/or monitoring and no other wounds. Review of Resident #1's Nursing Notes from 01/01/2025 through 02/18/2025 revealed no evidence of Resident #1's surgical incision site or the loop recorder monitoring equipment. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 12:00 p.m. with S3LPN. S3LPN stated he worked on 01/24/2025 and 01/25/2025 and was responsible for Resident #1's readmission to the facility. S3LPN stated when he completed the weekly skin body audits on 01/31/2025, 02/07/2025 and 02/14/2025, he did not document Resident #1's surgical incision. S3LPN stated a new wound or new dressing should have on the aforementioned dates should have been documented new wound and MD/NP notified. S3LPN stated the wound care nurse should be notified of the new wound to request an assessment and treatment of the new wound or dressing and was not. S3LPN confirmed he did see a new dressing on Resident #1, during readmission and on the weekly skin assessments. S3LPN confirmed a readmission skin assessment should have been completed and had not been. S3LPN confirmed he completed a weekly skin assessment for the resident on 01/31/2025, 02/07/2025 and 02/14/2025 and did not document the surgical incision or dressing. S3LPN confirmed there were no orders for assessment, monitoring, or treatment implemented for Resident #1's surgical incision or monitoring equipment from 01/24/2025 through 02/17/2025. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/20/2025 at 10:46 a.m. with S6NP. S6NP stated she was aware Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility from the local hospital status post loop recorder placement. S6NP confirmed Resident #1 did not receive care for his left chest wall dressing at the loop recorder insertion site, which caused a likelihood for Resident #1 to develop an infection. S6NP stated Resident #1's incision should have been treated or monitored, and was not. An interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 10:59 a.m. with S4LPN. S4LPN stated she provided care to Resident #1 on her shifts from 01/24/2025 through 02/19/2025 S4LPN stated she did not receive report or see any documentation in the EHR stating Resident #1 had a surgical wound or monitoring equipment. S4LPN stated she observed the dressing to Resident #1's left chest wall, but did not provide treatment because she did not have orders. S4LPN said she did not notify anyone of the dressing or contact the MD/NP for orders. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/20/2025 at 1:01 p.m. with S13WCN2. S13WCN2 stated she was responsible for providing resident wound care from 01/24/2025 through mid-February 2025. S13WCN2 confirmed staff did not report a surgical incision or dressing for Resident #1 from 01/24/2025 to 02/17/2025. An interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 11:11 a.m. with S8WCN1. S8WCN1 stated Resident #1 had no orders for surgical incision care. S8WCN1 confirmed staff did not report a surgical incision for Resident #1 from her hire date in February 2025 to 02/17/2025. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 9:48 a.m. with S7NP. S7NP confirmed he would expect the nurses to follow the AVS orders received from the hospital. S7NP stated he would expect the nurses to notify the facility's wound care nurse practitioner and wound care nurse, if there were no orders for a wound or incision. He stated he expected the nurse to monitor, as ordered, the incision and immediately report to him and the wound care nurse practitioner any signs and symptoms of decline in the incision, not healing properly and any other issues with the resident and/or incision. An interview was conducted 02/20/2025 at 10:30 a.m. with S2DON. S2DON confirmed the nurse was expected to conduct a head to toe skin assessment and document accurate findings when a resident was readmitted to the facility and weekly. S2DON confirmed any nurse that observed a skin dressing on a resident without documentation or orders should contact the physician to clarify what treatment is needed. S2DON reviewed Resident #1's EHR and verified there was no documentation noting Resident #1 had a skin incision or monitoring equipment assessment, monitoring or treatment. An interview was conducted on 02/21/2025 at 1:00 p.m. with S1ADM. S1ADM stated the nursing staff had not completed nursing care assessment and monitoring for Resident #1's surgical incision per facility policy and procedure, which could have caused complications with his surgical incision. The facility implemented the following plan of removal to correct the deficient practice: Corrective Action 1) Orders reviewed and order clarification obtained on 02/20/2025 from PCP for loop recorder monitoring and maintenance to start after all staff providing care has been completed. 2) Full body skin assessment of Resident #1 completed on 02/19/2025. 3) An order was obtained to monitor Resident #1's left chest wall incision site every shift for tenderness and signs of infection starting 02/19/2025. Identification of others at risk l) All newly admitted or re-admitted residents with surgical incisions or medical devices had the potential to be affected. Systemic Changes l) DON/designee will ensure all nursing staff (including agency) receive education on admission assessment, verifying, clarifying and accurately transcribing admission orders, as well as training on proper completion of skin assessments and body audits. This training was started on 02/19/2025 and completed 02/21/2025. All future incoming employees and agency workers will be trained prior to being allowed to provide any treatment. 2) The admitting nurse will call the PCP to hospital discharge orders and obtain clarification as needed. Once orders are verified the admission nurse will accurately transcribe new orders into the EHR and a second nurse will confirm orders for accuracy, to start on 02/21/2025. 3) Clinical administrative staff will review all newly admitted residents discharge orders, admission orders, and admission assessments to ensure accuracy and completion during morning clinical meeting daily starting on 02/21/2025. Monitoring 1) DON/designee to complete random audits of newly admitted /re-admitted residents discharge orders, admission orders and admission assessments for completion and accuracy weekly x 4 weeks then monthly x 2 months. 2) Audit trends will be reported to facility QAPI for review and further recommendations. 3) The facility asserts the likelihood for serious harm to any recipient no longer exists as of 02/21/2025. Throughout the survey from 02/20/2025 to 02/21/2025, observations, interviews, and record review revealed the above listed actions were implemented. Random staff interviews revealed the above education for staff was completed and monitoring by S2DON was started as mentioned above in the POR.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3 ) sampled residents, by failing to ensure Resident #1 was coded for a surgical wound. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Clinical Records revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Cerebral Infarction. Further review revealed Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/30/2025 revealed Resident #1 was not coded for surgical wounds in Section M: Skin Conditions, Line M1040-Other Ulcers, Wounds, and Skin Problems. Review of Resident #1's Nurse Practitioner (NP) Progress notes dated 01/24/2025 through 02/18/2025 revealed the following, in part: On 01/25/2025 at 5:40 p.m., S6NP noted under admission History and Physical section: Cardiovascular: Left Chest Wall dressing with scant bloody drainage status post loop recorder placement. On 01/26/2025 at 3:20 p.m., S6NP noted under Physician/Practitioner Note section: Cardiovascular: Left Chest Wall dressing with scant bloody drainage status post loop recorder placement. An interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 4:30 p.m. with S9LPN. S9LPN stated upon completion of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/30/2025, she reviewed the aforementioned S6NP's progress notes and overlooked the Cardiovascular section of the note, which indicated Resident #1 had a left chest wall dressing with scant bloody drainage status post loop recorder placement. S9LPN confirmed Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/30/2025 did not accurately reflect Resident #1's status by reflecting he had a surgical wound. An interview was conducted on 02/24/2025 with S2DON. S2DON reviewed Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/30/2025, and confirmed the assessment did not accurately reflect Resident #1's status by reflecting he had a surgical wound and should have.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to include a resident's medical and nursing needs for a surgical inci...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to include a resident's medical and nursing needs for a surgical incision and loop recorder monitoring equipment with measurable objectives and timeframes for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for Care Plans. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans dated 03/2023 revealed the following in part: Purpose: To provide each resident with a person-centered, comprehensive care plan to address the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Guidelines: 1. The care plan will be comprehensive and person-centered. It will drive the type of care and services that resident receives and will describe the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental and psychosocial needs and preferences; as well as how the facility will assist in meeting those needs and preferences. 11. The care planning process will be an on-going process. 12. Resident care needs and care plan interventions will be communicated with direct care staff Review of Resident #1's Clinical Records revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Cerebral Infarction and Monoplegia. Further review revealed Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's After Visit Summary Discharge Instructions Orders (AVS) for local hospital admission dated 01/19/2025 through 01/24/2025 revealed the following, in part: Primary diagnosis was Acute Arterial Ischemic Stroke, Multifocal, and Multiple Vascular Territories. Further review revealed Local Hospital Facility Transfer Orders included discharge instructions for loop recorder: You may shower in 24 hours after the procedure. Allow soapy water to gently run over chest incision, not directly on incision. Do not rub or scrub incision. No bathtubs or submerging in water until site is completely healed. Keep site clean and dry at all times. Inspect site daily for tenderness, discharge, or signs of infection. Apply ice pack for 24 hours. Do not remove the white adhesive strips, allow them to fall off on their own. Review of Resident #1's Nurse Practitioner (NP) Progress notes from 01/24/2025 through 02/18/2025 revealed the following, in part: 01/25/2025 at 5:40 p.m., S6NP- admission History and Physical: HPI: Resident #1 sent to the emergency room and he was admitted for evaluation of possible Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA). Loop recorder was placed while inpatient. Cardiovascular: Left Chest Wall dressing with scant bloody drainage status post loop recorder placement. 01/26/2025 at 3:20 p.m., S6NP- Physician/Practitioner Note: Cardiovascular: Loop recorder placed. Cardiovascular: Left Chest Wall dressing with scant bloody drainage status post loop recorder placement. Assessment/Plan: loop recorder Review of Resident #1's current Care Plan revealed no care plan problem or intervention for a surgical incision to the left chest wall and/or the loop recorder equipment. An observation was made of Resident #1 on 02/17/2025 at 4:45 p.m. Resident #1 was observed in his room and a beige medical equipment was visible on the night stand next to the bed plugged in. Resident #1 lifted his shirt and a dressing was observed on his left chest wall. The dressing was a white gauze with a small, dried, maroon drainage covered with a large clear adhesive with rolled edges and was not dated. An interview was conducted on 02/17/2025 at 4:45 p.m. with Resident #1. Resident #1 stated he was in the hospital recently for a stroke and they put in a loop recorder in his chest. Resident #1 stated the doctor at the Local Hospital told him to plug in the medical equipment for the loop recorder that was given to him at discharge to monitor his heart. Resident #1 stated the medical equipment had been in his room plugged in since his readmission on [DATE]. An observation was made of Resident #1 on 02/19/2025 at 9:03 a.m. Resident #1 observed in his room. He lifted his shirt and a dressing was observed on his left chest wall. The dressing was a white gauze with a small, dried, maroon drainage covered with a large clear adhesive with rolled edges. An interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 4:30 p.m. with S9LPN. S9LPN stated she was the Care Plan nurse and readmission nurse for Resident #1. S9LPN stated upon Resident #1's readmission on [DATE], she reviewed the AVS orders and overlooked part of the orders with the title [Local Hospital] Facility Transfer Orders, which included discharge instructions for loop recorder incision care and monitoring. S9LPN stated upon further review of Resident #1's electronic health record (EHR) she reviewed the aforementioned S6NP's progress notes and overlooked the Cardiovascular section of the note, which indicated Resident #1 had a Left Chest Wall dressing with scant bloody drainage status post loop recorder placement and did not update Resident #1's Care Plan to reflect Resident #1's status. S9LPN confirmed Resident #1's Care Plan did not include medical and nursing needs for a surgical wound and/or loop recorder monitoring equipment with measurable objectives and timeframes and should have been. An interview was conducted on 02/24/2025 with S2DON. S2DON reviewed Resident #1's Care Plan from 01/24/2025 through 02/18/2025 and confirmed the Care Plan did not include medical and nursing needs for a surgical wound and/or loop recorder monitoring equipment with measurable objectives and timeframes and should have been.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure resident records were maintained and accurate in accordance ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure resident records were maintained and accurate in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) sampled residents' records reviewed. The facility failed to ensure staff: 1. Accurately completed readmission assessment for Resident #1; 2. Maintained documented blood pressure readings with blood pressure medication administration for Resident #1; and 3. Accurately documented weekly skin assessments for Resident #1. Findings: Review of facility's policy titled Administration Resident Records-Identifiable Information, dated 02/2023 revealed the following, in part: Policy: The facility will maintain a complete, accurate, readily accessible and systematically organized medical record, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for each resident. Guidelines: 1. The medical record will reflect a resident's progress toward achieving their person-centered plan of care objective goals and the improvement and maintenance of their clinical and functional status. 2. The medical record will reflect the resident's condition and the care and services provided across disciplines to facilitate communication among the interdisciplinary team. 4. The medical record will contain: b. A record of the resident's assessments; e. nurse progress notes; Review of Resident #1's Clinical Records revealed he was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Acute Arterial Ischemic Stroke and Hypertension 1. Review of Resident #1's re-admission Evaluation dated 01/24/2025 revealed no readmission assessment documentation. Review of Resident #1's Nursing Notes dated 01/24/2025 revealed no readmission assessment note. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 12:00 p.m. with S3LPN. S3LPN stated he readmitted Resident #1 to the facility on [DATE]. S3LPN stated upon Resident #1's readmission, a complete and accurate physical and skin assessment should have been documented in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and was not. An interview was conducted on 02/20/2025 at 10:30 a.m. with S2DON. S2DON confirmed when a readmission assessment was performed, she expected nursing staff to conduct a head to toe physical and skin assessment and document accurate findings in an readmission evaluation and/or nursing notes. S2DON reviewed Resident #1's Electronic Health Records (EHR) and confirmed there was no readmission evaluation or nursing notes regarding the readmission assessment and should have been. 2. Review of Resident #1's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date: 01/25/2025. Lisinopril tablet 10 milligram, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential (primary) hypertension, hold if blood pressure less than 110/60 and notify Nurse Practitioner (NP). Review of Resident #1's Medical Administrative Record (MAR) from 01/25/2025 to 02/17/2025 revealed no documented blood pressure readings. Review of Resident #1's vital sign records from 01/25/2025 through 02/17/2025 revealed no documented blood pressure readings. A telephone interview was conducted on 02/18/2025 at 11:02 a.m. with S3LPN. S3LPN confirmed in Resident #1's EHR from 01/25/2025 to 02/17/2025 there were no blood pressure readings documented in conjunction with Lisinopril medication administration and there should have been. An interview was conducted on 02/18/2025 at 4:15 p.m. with S4LPN. S4LPN stated when she took care of Resident #1 on her shifts from 01/25/2025 to 02/17/2025, she documented the blood pressure results on her personal nursing flowsheets and could not readily produce these documents because they were discarded in the shredder. After review of Resident #1's EHR from 01/25/2025 to 02/17/2025, she confirmed there were no blood pressure readings documented in conjunction with Lisinopril medication administration and there should have been. An interview was conducted on 02/18/2025 at 3:45 p.m. with S2DON. S2DON stated nursing staff have personal nursing flowsheets to document residents' vital signs, but were not part of residents' EHR. After review of Resident #1's EHR from 01/25/2025 through 02/17/2025, S2DON confirmed there were no blood pressure readings documented in conjuction with Lisinopril medication administration and should have been. 3. Review of Resident #1's local hospital records admission, 01/19/2025, through discharge, 01/24/2025, revealed an implanted loop recorder was implanted on the left chest wall on 01/24/2025. Review of Resident #1's current Physician Orders revealed on 11/01/2024, an order was implemented for Weekly Skin Check - Document results on Weekly Skin Observation Assessment every day shift every 7 days. Review of Resident #1's weekly Skin Observation assessment dated [DATE], 02/07/2025, and 02/14/2025 revealed normal skin assessments with no new wounds or surgical incisions documented. Review of Resident #1's Nursing Notes from 01/24/2025 through 02/18/2025 revealed no documentation of Resident #1's surgical incision site. An interview was conducted on 02/19/2025 at 12:00 p.m. with S3LPN. S3LPN confirmed he observed a new dressing on Resident #1 and did not accurately document the new wound or incision on the 01/31/2025 weekly skin observation assessment and should have. An interview was conducted on 02/20/2025 at 10:30 a.m. with S2DON. S2DON confirmed nursing staff was expected to conduct a head to toe skin assessment and document accurate findings when a weekly skin assessment was performed as ordered. S2DON confirmed when nursing staff observed a new wound or incision it should be accurately documented on the weekly skin observation assessment. S2DON confirmed Resident #1 had a new incision on the left chest wall from a loop recorder implantation on 01/24/2025. S2DON reviewed Resident #1's weekly skin observation assessment dated [DATE] and verified there was no documentation of a new incision and should have been.
Jan 2025 7 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual and psychosocia...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual and psychosocial abuse for 1(#33) of 12 (#13, #14, #24, #31, #33, #61, #74, #77, #190, #191, #192, and #193) residents reviewed for sexual and psychosocial abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 was not sexually abused by S5MAIN. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation for Resident #33, a cognitively impaired blind resident, on 01/08/2025, when it was discovered that during the Christmas/New Year Holiday Season, S8CNA witnessed S5MAIN sitting on Resident #33's bed, rubbing the resident's shoulder, and kissed her on the cheek. S8CNA failed to report the sexual abuse and S5MAIN continued to work in the facility until 01/02/2025 at 5:00 p.m. On 01/05/2025, #R1 reported S5MAIN sat down next to Resident #33 on her bed, rubbed Resident #33's back and arm, kissed her cheek and neck and said he wanted to see her beautiful cat again. As a result of the investigation, despite there not being a significant decline in mental or physical functioning for Resident #33, it could be determined the reasonable person would have experienced severe psychosocial harm as a result of the sexual abuse, since a reasonable person would not expect to be treated in this manner in their own home or a health care facility. S1ADMIN was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation on 01/10/2025 at 6:09 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy situation was removed on 01/12/2025 at 2:15 p.m., as confirmed by onsite verification through observations, interviews, and record reviews. The facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal (POR) prior to the survey exit. The deficient practice continued at the potential for more than minimal harm for the remaining 92 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, with a revision date of 05/15/2023, revealed the following, in part: Intent: To promote a safe environment for residents, visitors, and employees through prompt and appropriate response and follow up to abuse allegations and events. Definitions: Sexual Abuse: Non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Responsibilities of Facilities and Covered Individuals 2. The facility will immediately protect the resident from further potential abuse while the investigation is in progress. This includes: a. Removing employee/s from duty when an allegation has been made until the investigation has been completed and a determination has been made. c. Implementing increased supervision as necessary for alleged perpetrator and alleged victim. d. Conducting interviews with other residents and staff. e. Monitoring the alleged victim and intervening as appropriate, for indications of physical injury, pain, or psychosocial distress. Review of Resident #33's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, Unspecified Dementia, Difficulty in Walking, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Legal Blindness. Review of Resident #33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with and Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/01/2024 revealed Resident #33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 08, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #33's current Care Plan revealed the resident was blind, cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 8, and required assistance with ADLS to include transfer assistance and a wheelchair for mobility. On 01/06/2025 review of the facility's self-reported incident dated 01/05/2025 at 9:59 p.m. revealed: Resident Victim: Resident #33 Accused: S5MAIN Accused Allegations: Sexual Abuse Incident Description: #R1 told S6CNA that she saw S5MAIN kissing her roommate (Resident #33) on the forehead and the cheek. She says that she overheard S5MAIN tell Resident #33 he could see her cat when she was walking naked in the hallway. Review of #R1's witness statement revealed the following, in part: On 01/03/2025, Friday, at approximately 4:30 p.m., S5MAIN sat on Resident #33's bed, began to rub her back and arm and began peck kissing her left cheek. S5MAIN whispered to Resident #33. He told her how beautiful she was, and he had seen her cat (vagina) the other day when she was running down the hall. He told Resident #33 that her cat was special. I spoke up and told him he needed to get out then closed my curtain because was disgusting and unacceptable. Before he left the room he told Resident #33 he would bring her more coffee. Review of S20LPN's witness statement dated 01/05/2025 at 9:00 p.m. and 9:15 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Performed complete head to toe body audit on Resident #33. No markings, scratching, soreness noted. No pain or discomfort. Resident #33 does not recall anything. Review of S5MAIN witness statement dated 01/06/2025 revealed the following, in part: I don't really remember, but I was having a conversation about my and Resident 33's meeting when she was in the hall outside of her room with her cat hanging out. Her words not mine. Just kind of introducing her to her new roommate describing what a special Resident #33 was. I then gave Resident #33 a kiss on her head. I think she wasn't feel well that day and I had no coffee to get her. On 01/07/2024 at 9:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADMIN. S1ADMIN stated on 01/05/2025, #R1 reported to S6CNA that she had witnessed S5MAIN kissing Resident #33. #R1 reported S5MAIN was heard telling Resident #33 he had seen her cat when she was walking naked. Review of S5MAIN's personnel file revealed he began working in the facility on 09/30/2024. On 01/07/2024 at 9:54 a.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #33. Resident #33 stated she could not see. The resident was oriented to person, but was unable to answer questions due to cognitive impairment. During the interview, Resident #33 repeatedly stated she liked and wanted coffee. Resident #33 was unable to recall if anyone had kissed or touched her inappropriately. On 01/07/2025 at 10:20 a.m. an interview was conducted with #R1. #R1 reported Resident #33 was her roommate. #R1 said Resident #33 could not see, had dementia and did not always know what was going on, and always wanted coffee. #R1 stated approximately a week ago, she was in her room in bed when S5MAIN came into the room with a handheld drill. #R1 stated Resident #33 was asleep in bed. The resident stated S5MAIN walked over to Resident #33's bed, tried to wake her up by whispering to her and rubbing her back and arm. #R1 stated S5MAIN kissed Resident #33's left cheek. She stated S5MAIN woke Resident #33 up and asked her if she wanted coffee, then left the room and returned with a cup of coffee that he gave to Resident #33. She stated S5MAIN sat down next to Resident #33 on her bed, began to rub Resident #33's back and arm, and again kissed her on the cheek and the neck. #R1 stated other staff members witnessed S5MAIN sitting on Resident #33's bed. #R1 stated she heard S5MAIN tell Resident #33 he wanted to see her beautiful cat again, and that he had seen her beautiful cat while she was naked in the hall. #R1 stated Resident #33 seemed to be in shock and asked S5MAIN to move over and said to S5MAIN he shouldn't be sitting on her bed. She said Resident #33 told S5MAIN to give her some space. #R1 said S5MAIN told Resident #33 he was going to come back later. She stated she was scared to report the incident and waited until one of the CNA's she trusted returned to work. #R1 said she reported the incident to S6CNA with another staff member present on 01/05/2025. #R1 said after she reported it the other staff member stated another one. Review of #R1's MDS with an ARD of 12/26/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a BIMS of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted on 01/07/2025 at 12:01 p.m. with S6CNA. She stated on 01/05/2025, #R1 reported to her that approximately a week ago, she was in her room in bed when S5MAIN came into the room. She stated #R1 reported S5MAIN walked over to Resident #33's bed, leaned over Resident #33, rubbed her arm and back, kissed her, and asked her if she wanted coffee. S6CNA stated #R1 reported she heard S5MAIN tell Resident #33 he had seen her cat meaning vagina. S6CNA stated she told S4LPN about what #R1 reported. S4LPN responded that she should have reported what S5MAIN had done to her sooner because if she had S5MAIN would not have been able to do this to Resident #33. S6CNA explained S5MAIN was suspended last week for pulling S4LPN's pants down without consent while on duty. S6CNA stated after speaking with S4LPN, she reported the incident to S3RN. A telephone interview was conducted on 01/07/2025 at 12:32 p.m. with S5MAIN. S5MAIN stated Resident #33 liked coffee and he would sometimes bring her some in her room and at other times would go visit her in her room. S5MAIN said he went into Resident #33's room sometime around Christmas, to tell her merry Christmas. He also stated he went into the Residents room recently to welcome #R1 to the facility. He stated the last time he went into the room, Resident #33's roommate was awake and in the room. He confirmed he sat on the residents' bed while she was in it and kissed the resident on the forehead and again on her cheek. He said he thought it was appropriate to kiss Resident #33 because they had developed a close relationship. S5MAIN stated he told #R1 that he had seen her in the hallway when she was only wearing a shirt. He stated Resident #33 asked him if he had never seen a cat before. S5MAIN stated after speaking with the resident he kissed her again on the forehead and the cheek. S5MAIN stated he was suspended from the facility on 01/02/2025 and refused to speak about why. On 01/07/2025 at 1:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. S4LPN said on 12/10/2024, S5MAIN followed her into her office, S5MAIN closed and locked the office door, advanced towards her from behind, pulled her pants down and touched her inappropriately with his hand on her buttocks. She stated she did not report the incident to anyone at the facility because she was scared. S4LPN said on 01/01/2025, S5MAIN came into her office again and said I know there isn't anybody here today and I want to look at your hole in what she perceived as a sexually suggestive tone, raising his eyebrow, and leaning towards her. He began to tell her what he wanted to do to her hole which made her feel uncomfortable and scared so she ran out of the room. She said after she ran out of the room, she reported both the 12/10/2024 and 01/01/2025 incidents with S5MAIN to S2DON on 01/01/2025. She said S2DON began monitoring S5MAIN to make sure nothing else happened to staff or residents. S4LPN stated on 01/02/2025, S1ADMIN was notified of the 12/10/2024 and 01/01/2025 incidents, and S5MAIN was suspended. S4LPN stated she should have reported the 12/10/2024 incident immediately to S2DON and S1ADMIN, but did not. Throughout the interview, S4LPN was observed to become tearful and stated S5MAIN would not have been able to hurt Resident #33 if she had told S2DON or S1ADMIN what happened on 12/10/2024. S4LPN stated she received abuse training within the last 90 days, but not after 01/01/2025. An interview was conducted on 01/07/2025 at 3:56 p.m. with S7CNA. He stated a few weeks ago, S4LPN reported to him that S5MAIN made a physical sexual advance towards her. S7CNA also stated that S8CNA recently told him she saw S5MAIN sitting on Resident #33's bed, talking to her and making inappropriate sexual statements. S7CNA stated on 01/05/2025, #R1 told him she had witnessed S5MAIN sitting on Resident #33's bed, talking to her and making inappropriate sexual statements. S7CNA stated it was not appropriate for S5MAIN to sit on Resident #33's bed and make inappropriate sexual comments to the resident. He stated other employees said S5MAIN exhibited weird behaviors, but he did not know what that meant. S7CNA said he never reported anything to his supervisor or the administrator. An interview was conducted on 01/08/2025 at 1:13 p.m. with Resident #33's sister. She stated Resident #33 had dementia and was not cognitively intact. She stated she was notified of an incident involving Resident #33 and a worker at the facility on 01/05/2025. She stated an employee of the facility told her a male worker kissed Resident #33 on her jaw and inappropriately touched/stroked her back and arm with his hands. She stated Resident #33 would not want an unknown male kissing and touching her. She stated, if Resident #33 had all her cognitive abilities, the resident would have suffered serious psychosocial harm from the male staff kissing and touching her while in her bed. She stated Resident #33 wouldn't want that person near her and would have been fearful. On 01/08/2024 at 2:24 p.m., an interview was conducted with S18LPN. She stated she was familiar with Resident #33. She stated Resident #33 was confused at baseline and would have different levels of confusion at different times. On 01/08/2024 at 2:28p.m., an interview was conducted with S19LPN. She stated she was familiar with Resident #33. She stated Resident #33 was confused at baseline and would have different levels of confusion at different times. On 01/08/2025 at 2:40 p.m., and interview was conducted with S8CNA. She stated at some time between Christmas and New Year's Day she was checking on the residents and saw S5MAIN in Resident #33's room. She stated she saw S5MAIN bring Resident #33 a cup of coffee. She stated S5MAIN sat on Resident #33's bed, talked to her, rubbed the resident's shoulder with his hand, and then kissed her on the cheek. S8CNA stated she could not hear what S5MAIN was saying. S8CNA stated #R1 was in the room. S8CNA stated she thought it was strange that someone from the maintenance department was that chummy with a resident. She stated she had seen S5MAIN in Resident #33's room before, but she had not seen him sitting on the bed before. She stated the observation made her feel uncomfortable and she thought it was inappropriate. She stated she did not report the incident to administration and thought she would have if it happened again. She stated she did communicate what she saw with another CNA. She confirmed she was trained on abuse prior to the incident and confirmed she should have reported what she saw because it was sexual abuse. An interview was conducted on 01/10/2025 at 1:36 p.m. with S2DON. S2DON said on 01/01/2025, S4LPN accused S5MAIN of sexual assaulting her. She stated after S4LPN reported the accusation of sexual assault, she began visually monitoring S5MAIN to make sure nothing happened to any of the staff or residents. S2DON stated S5MAIN's behavior was somewhat weird and quirky, and after a few hours of monitoring him, she told him he could leave for the day. She stated she did not monitor to see if S5MAIN actually left the facility. She stated on 01/02/2025, she reported the allegation to the administrator and S5MAIN was removed from the facility. S2DON said Resident #33 had a BIMS of 8 and had cognitive impairment. S2DON stated on 01/05/2025, around 6:00 p.m., S3RN reported #R1 had witnessed S5MAIN in her room with Resident #33. #R1 reported S5MAIN kissed Resident #33's forehead and cheek, rubbed Resident #33's arm and back, and made sexually inappropriate comments to Resident #33. S2DON stated she immediately contacted S1ADMIN and the Regional Director of Clinical. She reported, after S3RN reported S5MAIN had allegedly sexually abused Resident #33, the facility began an investigation to include interviewing #R1 and S20LPN completed a body audit on Resident #33. She stated Resident #33 was interviewed and unable to state if someone had sexually abused her, but the DON said due to Resident #33's cognitive impairment, she would not take her word. She stated the police were not notified. S2DON stated she did not know any of the facility staff had witnessed the incident and confirmed the staff that witnessed it should have immediately reported it so Resident #33 could have been protected. An interview was conducted on 01/10/2025 at 2:30 p.m. with S1ADMIN. S1ADMIN said Resident #33 had dementia. S1ADMIN stated on 01/05/2025, around 7:00 p.m., S2DON told him #R1 reported she witnessed S5MAIN kiss Resident #33 on the forehead and heard S5MAIN make an inappropriate comment to Resident #33 about her cat. S1ADMIN stated he notified the Regional Administration and the facility began an investigation to include interviewing all cognitive female residents. S1ADMIN stated S5MAIN told him a few weeks ago he had seen Resident #33 naked in the hallway. S5MAIN explained he was in #R1 and Resident #33's room recently and spoke to them about seeing Resident #33 naked. He stated S5MAIN said after he spoke to the residents he left the room and kissed Resident #33 on her forehead while leaving. S1ADMIN stated S5MAIN was suspended from work on 01/02/2025 and left the facility sometime in the late afternoon or early evening. S1ADMIN stated he was not aware an employee had witnessed the incident between S5MAIN and Resident #33 and had not reported it. S1ADMIN stated he had not reported the incident to police because he did not think it involved inappropriate touching. Review of the Individual Employee Time Card revealed on 01/02/2024 S5MAIN clocked in to work at 8:30 a.m. and out at 5:00 p.m. Review of Both S5MAIN and S8CNA's Individual Employee Time Cards revealed the employees were both in the facility on the following dates and times. 12/31 from 3:09 p.m. too 5:15 p.m. 1/1 from 3:09 p.m. to 5:27 p.m. 01/02 from 3:18 p.m. 5:00 p.m. Plan of Removal The surveyor confirmed the following had been initiated and/or implemented prior to exit: Corrective Action: 1. The accused has not worked in the building since 01/02/2025 and is currently on indefinite suspension pending further review. 2. Resident #33 was evaluated by Nurse Practitioner [NAME] on 01/08/2025 with no findings. 3. DON/Designee has in-serviced all employees and agency staff prior to the beginning of their shift on abuse, noting sexual and verbal, and the proper reporting procedure and how to identify abuse and signs of abuse. Employees gave verbal returned demonstrations of types of abuse, signs and proper reporting procedures. 4. Social Services/Designee performed a psychosocial evaluation on Resident #33 on 01/10/2025 with no findings. 5. DON/Designee has consulted with outside psych services 01/11/2025 to evaluate Resident #33 for psychosocial harm and is scheduled 01/13/2025. 6. From these evaluations, if any concerns are identified, the facility will develop a plan of care to address any concerns, trauma, etc. that might be identified. 7. DON/Designee has put daily monitors in place on 01/10/2025 for each shift for Resident #33 that staff will ask resident does she feel safe in the facility with no psycho-social harm exhibited. 8. The administrator/Designee has reported the alleged violation of abuse to the police on 01/10/2025. Identification of others at risk: 1. DON/Designee has interviewed interviewable residents on 01/10/2025 to determine if they have experienced sexual/verbal abuse, and if they feel safe in the facility with no findings. 2. DON/Designee has observed non interviewable residents on 01/11/2025 for non-verbal psycho-social signs of sexual/verbal abuse with no findings. Systemic Changes: 1. DON/Designee has in-serviced all employees and agency personnel starting on 01/10/2025 and will educate all employees and agency staff prior to the beginning of their shift on abuse, noting sexual and verbal, and the proper reporting procedure and how to identify abuse and signs of abuse. Employees gave verbal returned demonstration of types of abuse, signs and proper reporting procedures. Monitoring: 1. Audits have been conducted and are ongoing by DON or designee on 10 residents questioning if they have experienced sexual/verbal abuse, and if they feel safe in the facility weekly x's 4 weeks, then monthly x's 2 months. 2. Audits have been conducted and are ongoing by DON or designee on 10 non interviewable residents to observe for any non-verbal signs of physical/sexual/verbal weekly x's 4 weeks, then monthly x's 2 months. 3. DON/Designee has conducted and is ongoing interview audits of 5 staff members from various shifts and departments to ensure that there has not been observations of inappropriate behavior between staff members and residents in the past 30 days with cognitively intact or cognitively impaired residents. 4. Audit trends will be reported to facility QAPI for review and further recommendations.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of sexual abuse were reported immediately to t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of sexual abuse were reported immediately to the facility's administrator and to law enforcement authorities in an appropriate timeframe for 1 (#33) of 12 (#13, #14, #24, #31, #33, #61, #74, #77, #190, #191, #192, and #193) residents reviewed for sexual abuse. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff immediately reported allegations of sexual abuse to the administrator; and 2. The Administrator reported allegations of sexual abuse to local law enforcement This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation for Resident #33, a cognitively impaired blind resident, on 01/08/2025, when it was discovered that during the Christmas/New Year Holiday Season, S8CNA witnessed S5MAIN sitting on Resident #33's bed, rubbing the resident's shoulder, and kissed her on the cheek. S8CNA failed to report the sexual abuse and S5MAIN continued to work in the facility until 01/02/2025 at 5:00 p.m. On 01/05/2025, #R1 reported to S6CNA S5MAIN sat down next to Resident #33 on her bed, rubbed Resident #33's back and arm, kissed her cheek and neck and said he wanted to see her beautiful cat again. Administration was made aware of the incident on 01/05/2025 and failed to report the allegations of sexual abuse to local law enforcement. As a result of the investigation, despite there not being a significant decline in mental or physical functioning for Resident #33, it could be determined the reasonable person would have experienced severe psychosocial harm as a result of the sexual abuse, since a reasonable person would not expect to be treated in this manner in their own home or a health care facility. S1ADMIN was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation on 01/10/2025 at 6:09 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy situation was removed on 01/12/2025 at 2:15 p.m., as confirmed by onsite verification through observations, interviews, and record reviews. The facility implemented an acceptable Plan of Removal (POR) prior to the survey exit. The deficient practice continued at the potential for more than minimal harm for the remaining 92 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Cross Reference F600 Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, with a revision date of 05/15/2023, revealed the following, in part: Definitions: Sexual Abuse: Non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Responsibilities of Facilities and Covered Individuals 2. Reporting responsibilities for reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with State law: e. Sexual abuse Response to Allegations and Suspicions 1. Allegations may be verbal or in writing and will be reported to the administrator of the facility and other officials as required. Review of Resident #33's Clinical Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, Unspecified Dementia, Difficulty in Walking, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Legal Blindness. Review of Resident #33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/01/2024 revealed Resident #33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 08, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. On 01/06/2025 review of the facility's self-reported incident dated 01/05/2025 at 09:59 p.m. revealed: Resident Victim: Resident #33 Accused: S5MAIN Accused Allegations: Sexual Abuse Protective Actions: Suspended Pending Outcome Incident Description: #R1 told S6CNA that she saw S5MAIN kissing her roommate (Resident #33) on the forehead and the cheek. She says that she overheard S5MAIN tell Resident #33 he could see her cat when she was walking naked in the hallway. An interview was conducted on 01/08/2025 at 1:13 p.m. with Resident #33's sister. She stated Resident #33 had dementia and was not cognitively intact. She stated she was notified of an incident involving Resident #33 and a worker at the facility on 01/05/2025. She stated an employee of the facility told her a male worker kissed Resident #33 on her jaw and inappropriately touched/stroked her back and arm with his hands. She stated Resident #33 would not want an unknown male kissing and touching her. She stated, if Resident #33 had all her cognitive abilities, the resident would have suffered serious psychosocial harm from the male staff kissing and touching her while in her bed. She stated Resident #33 wouldn't want that person near her and would have been fearful. An interview was conducted on 01/07/2024 at 10:20 a.m. with #R1. #R1 stated approximately a week ago, she was in her room in bed when S5MAIN came into the room, walked over to Resident #33's bed, tried to wake her up by whispering to her and rubbing her back and arm. #R1 stated S5MAIN kissed Resident #33's left cheek, sat down next to Resident #33 on her bed, began to rub Resident #33's back and arm, and again kissed her on the cheek and the neck. #R1 stated other staff members witnessed S5MAIN sitting on Resident #33's bed. #R1 stated she heard S5MAIN tell Resident #33 he wanted to see her beautiful cat again, and that he had seen her beautiful cat while she was naked in the hall. #R1 said she reported the incident to S6CNA a few days after she witnessed it. She stated when she reported it to S6CNA on 01/05/2025 another staff member was present on 01/05/2025. Review of #R1's MDS with an ARD of 12/26/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a BIMS of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted on 01/08/2025 at 2:40 p.m. with S8CNA. She stated at some time between Christmas and New Year's Day, she was checking on the residents shortly after she reported for her shift after 3:00 p.m. and saw S5MAIN in Resident #33's room. She stated S5MAIN sat on Resident #33's bed, talked to her, rubbed the resident's shoulder with his hand, and then kissed her on the cheek. She stated the observation made her feel uncomfortable and she thought it was inappropriate. She stated she did not report the incident to administration and stated she would have if it happened again. She stated she did communicate what she saw with S6CNA and S7CNA. She confirmed she should have reported what she saw because it was sexual abuse. An interview was conducted on 01/07/2025 at 3:56 p.m. with S7CNA. S7CNA stated S8CNA recently told him she saw S5MAIN sitting on Resident #33's bed, talking to her and making inappropriate sexual statements. S7CNA stated on 01/05/2025, #R1 told him she had witnessed S5MAIN sitting on Resident #33's bed, talking to her and making inappropriate sexual statements. S7CNA said he never reported this to his supervisor or the administrator. An interview was conducted on 01/07/2025 at 12:01 p.m. with S6CNA. She stated on 01/05/2025, #R1 reported to her that approximately a week ago, S5MAIN came into the room, walked over to Resident #33's bed, leaned over Resident #33, rubbed her arm and back, kissed her, and asked her if she wanted coffee. S6CNA stated #R1 reported she heard S5MAIN tell Resident #33 he had seen her cat meaning vagina. S6CNA stated she reported #R1's allegations to S4LPN and S3RN. An interview was conducted on 01/10/2025 at 1:36 p.m. with S2DON. S2DON said Resident #33 had a BIMS of 8 and had cognitive impairment. S2DON stated on 01/05/2025, around 6:00 p.m., S3RN reported #R1 had witnessed S5MAIN in her room with Resident #33. #R1 reported S5MAIN kissed Resident #33's forehead and cheek, rubbed Resident #33's arm and back, and made sexually inappropriate comments to Resident #33. S2DON stated she immediately contacted S1ADMIN and the Regional Director of Clinical. S2DON stated she was not aware a staff member had witnessed the incident and confirmed the staff that witnessed it should have immediately reported it so Resident #33 could have been protected. An interview was conducted on 01/10/2025 at 2:30 p.m. with S1ADMIN. S1ADMIN said Resident #33 had dementia. S1ADMIN stated on 01/05/2025, around 7:00 p.m., S2DON told him #R1 reported she witnessed S5MAIN kiss Resident #33 on the forehead and heard S5MAIN make an inappropriate comment to Resident #33 about her cat. S1ADMIN stated S5MAIN told him a few weeks ago after he spoke to the residents he left the room and kissed Resident #33 on her forehead while leaving. S1ADMIN stated he was not aware an employee had witnessed the incident between S5MAIN and Resident #33 and had not reported it. S1ADMIN stated he had not reported the incident to police. Plan of Removal The surveyor confirmed the following had been initiated and/or implemented prior to exit: Corrective Action: 1. The accused has not worked in the building since 01/02/2025 and is currently on indefinite suspension pending further review. 2. Resident #33 was evaluated by the Nurse Practitioner on 01/08/2025. 3. DON/Designee has in-serviced all employees and agency staff prior to the beginning of their shift on abuse, noting sexual and verbal, and the proper reporting procedure and how to identify abuse and signs of abuse. Employees gave verbal returned demonstrations of types of abuse, signs and proper reporting procedures. 4. Social Services/Designee performed a psychosocial evaluation on Resident #33 on 01/10/2025. 5. DON/Designee has consulted with outside psych services 01/11/2025 to evaluate Resident #33 for psychosocial harm and is scheduled 01/13/2025. 6. From these evaluations, if any concerns are identified, the facility will develop a plan of care to address any concerns, trauma, etc. that might be identified. 7. DON/Designee has put daily monitors in place on 01/10/2025 for each shift for Resident #33 that staff will ask resident does she feel safe in the facility with no psycho-social harm exhibited. 8. The administrator/Designee has reported the alleged violation of abuse to the police on 01/10/2025. Identification of others at risk: 1. DON/Designee has interviewed interviewable residents on 01/10/2025 to determine if they have experienced sexual/verbal abuse, and if they feel safe in the facility with no findings. 2. DON/Designee has observed non interviewable residents on 01/11/2025 for non-verbal psycho-social signs of sexual/verbal abuse with no findings. Systemic Changes: 1. DON/Designee has in-serviced all employees and agency personnel starting on 01/10/2025 and will educate all employees and agency staff prior to the beginning of their shift on abuse, noting sexual and verbal, and the proper reporting procedure and how to identify abuse and signs of abuse. Employees gave verbal returned demonstration of types of abuse, signs and proper reporting procedures. Monitoring: 1. Audits have been conducted and are ongoing by DON or designee on 10 residents questioning if they have experienced sexual/verbal abuse, and if they feel safe in the facility weekly x's 4 weeks, then monthly x's 2 months. 2. Audits have been conducted and are ongoing by DON or designee on 10 non interviewable residents to observe for any non-verbal signs of physical/sexual/verbal weekly x's 4 weeks, then monthly x's 2 months. 3. DON/Designee has conducted and is ongoing interview audits of 5 staff members from various shifts and departments to ensure that there has not been observations of inappropriate behavior between staff members and residents in the past 30 days with cognitively intact or cognitively impaired residents. 4. Audit trends will be reported to facility QAPI for review and further recommendations.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received services with reasonable ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received services with reasonable accommodation of needs as evidenced by the facility failing to have a call pad within reach for 1 (#53) of 23 sampled residents reviewed in the final sample. Findings: Review of facility's policy titled Physical Environment Resident Call System revealed, in part, the following: Purpose: To provide residents with a means to directly contact caregivers from their room. Guidelines: 3. The call system will be accessible to residents while in bed or other sleeping accommodations within the resident room, and to a resident when lying on the floor. Review of Resident #53's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction with Right-Sided Hemiplegia. Review of Resident #53's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/06/2024 indicated resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, which indicated resident is moderate cognitively intact. Further review revealed, Resident #53 required total dependence with transfers, repositioning and activities of daily living (ADLs). Section B (ability to understand), usually understands. Review of Resident #53's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: Requires assistance with adl's due to Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) with hemiplegia Interventions: Bed Mobility: is totally dependent on staff for repositioning and turning in bed, Ensure call light within reach. Focus: Resident #53 able to move left hand and able to use call light when asked. An observation/interview was made on 01/06/2025 at 10:50 a.m. of Resident #53 lying in bed. The call assist pad was on bed at upper left shoulder area and out of Resident #53's reach. Resident #53 stated she could not reach the call pad. Resident #53 stated she is able to use the call pad when it is within her reach. Resident #53 immediately reached for the call pad and her eyes widened. Resident #53 pressed call pad with her left hand at this time to demonstrate she knew how to use the call pad. An observation was made on 01/06/2025 at 02:18 p.m. of call assist pad hanging down, off of left side of bed edge, toward floor. Resident # 53 unable to reach call pad. An observation was made on 01/07/2025 at 10:14 a.m. of Resident #53 lying in bed. The call pad was behind Resident #53's head, toward top of bed, and not within resident's reach. Resident #53 stated she did not know where her call pad was. An interview/observation was conducted on 01/07/2025 at 10:15 a.m. with S14CNA when she entered into Resident #53's room. S14CNA stated Resident #53 required call pad and was able to activate for assistance. She further stated call pad had to be placed in reachable position, which was mid chest area so she could reach it with her left hand. S14CNA verified that call pad was not left in proper position for Resident #53. S14CNA verified call pad cord was wrapped around bed rail and call pad should not have been at top of bed near Resident's head. An observation was made on 01/08/2025 at 1:30 p.m. of Resident # 53 supine in bed and call pad hanging down on left side of bed, not within reach. An interview was conducted with S2DON on 01/08/25 1:40 p.m. She stated that all Residents should have call pad or button within reach at all times. S2DON and Surveyor then entered into Resident #53's room and observed her soft touch call pad was not within Resident's reach. S2DON asked Resident #53 where she liked her call pad placed and Resident #53 touched her mid chest area. S2DON confirmed that the call pad was not within Resident #53's reach and it should have been.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's st...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1(#52) of 23 residents reviewed for MDS. Findings: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Dementia, Difficulty Walking, Dysarthria following Cerebrovascular Accident, Other lack of Coordination, Depression and Failure to Thrive. Review of Resident #52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/24/2024 revealed in part, the following: Section P: Restraints: Chair prevents rising -used less than daily. On 01/09/2025 at 2:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S17PTA. She stated she was familiar with Resident #52. She stated he had become weaker and could not sit up independently in a wheelchair for a period of time. She stated he lacked trunk control and a Geri chair would be used for safety and support. On 01/09/2025 at 1:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S8MDS. She stated Resident #52 used a Geri chair when out of bed for support and safety due to lack of trunk control. S8MDS reviewed Resident #52's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/24/2024 and stated the MDS was coded for, Chair prevents rising- used less than daily. S8MDS confirmed Resident #52's Geri chair was not used as a restraint and the MDS was coded in error. On 01/09/2025 at 1:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated Resident #52 used a Geri chair for support and safety due to poor trunk control and not a restraint. She confirmed the MDS should not have been coded as a restraint.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident's plan of care was revised for the use of a geri ch...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident's plan of care was revised for the use of a geri chair for 1 (#52) of 23 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Findings: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Dementia, Difficulty Walking, Dysarthria following CVA, Other lack of Coordination, Depression and Failure to Thrive. Review of Resident #52's most recent Care Plan revealed no documentation related to resident using a geri chair. On 01/07/2024 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10CNA. She stated Resident #52 used a geri chair. On 01/09/2025 at 10:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11CNA. She stated Resident #52 used a geri chair. On 01/09/2025 at 4:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S9CNA. He stated he started working at the facility in August 2024. He stated Resident #52 had always used a geri chair when he got out of bed. He stated he had never seen Resident #53 use a regular wheelchair. On 01/09/2025 at 1:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S8MDS. She stated she was responsible for MDS assessments and Care Plans. She stated Resident #52 used a geri chair when he got out of bed for support and safety due to lack of trunk control. She reviewed the current care plan and confirmed Resident #52 was not care planned for using a geri chair. On 01/09/2025 at 1:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated Resident #52 used a geri chair for support/safety due to poor trunk control. She stated she was not aware a resident needed to be care planned for a geri chair but she would update the care plan now.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff properly utilized Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during care for 2 of 2 (#53 and #57) residents observed for EBP; 2. The facility's infection control and prevention policy was reviewed annually. This had the potential to effect all 92 residents in the facility. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's policy revised 03/26/2024, titled Infection Prevention and Control Transmission-Based Precautions Enhanced Barrier Precautions revealed the following, in part: Policy: Enhanced barrier precautions are an infection control intervention used to reduce transmission of Central Disease Center (CDC) targeted multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities. Gown and gloves are worn by personnel during high-contact care activities for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices. Resident #53 Review of Resident #53's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #53's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date- 06/19/2024. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) site care every day. Start date- 04/22/2024. Place on enhanced barrier precautions. Resident #57 Review of Resident #57's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Left Leg Wound. Review of Resident #57's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date- 04/22/2024. Place resident on enhanced barrier precautions related to left leg wound. An observation was made on 01/07/2025 at 2:15 p.m. of Resident #53 and Resident #57's door to their shared room. A sign was noted on the door that read EBP which included instructions to wear gown and gloves during high contact activity. A simultaneous observation was made on 01/07/2025 at 2:15 p.m. of S14LPN providing assistance to both Resident #53 and #57 in their shared room. S14LPN applied a clean gown and gloves and entered the residents' room. Resident #57 requested S14LPN's assistance to be repositioned. S14LPN's gown came in contact with Resident #57 and Resident #57's linen which S14LPN used to reposition her upright in the geriatric chair. Between assisting Resident #57 and #53, S14LPN did not change her gown. With the dirty gown, S14LPN administered Resident #53's medications through the PEG Tube. After S14LPN completed medication administration for Resident #53, she removed the soiled gown and gloves. Without donning clean PPE, S14LPN repositioned Resident #57 in her geriatric chair as mentioned above. An interview was conducted on 01/07/2025 at 2:18 p.m. with S14LPN. S14LPN stated Resident #53 was on EBP because of the PEG tube. She stated Resident #57 had an open wound, but was not on EBP and did not require gown and glove use with care. S14LPN confirmed the above observations of her providing care to Resident #53 and Resident #57. S14LPN stated she should have changed her gown after she repositioned Resident #57 and before administering medication to Resident #53. An interview was conducted on 01/08/2025 at 8:35 a.m. with S2DON. S2DON confirmed Resident #53 had a PEG tube and was on EBP. S2DON confirmed Resident #57 had a wound and was on EBP. S2DON confirmed a gown and gloves should be worn when a resident on EBP was repositioned. S2DON stated she expected the nurse to change her gown after Resident #57 was repositioned and before Resident #53 was administered medication by PEG tube. She stated she expected the nurse to apply a gown and glove before repositioning Resident #57. 2. Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program had a published date of 11/2017 and a revision date of 06/08/2022. Review of the facility's documentation for annual review of the above policy revealed no evidence of annual review. An interview was conducted on 01/08/2025 at 4:50 p.m. with S1ADMIN. S1ADMIN stated he did not know the last time the facility's Infection Prevention and Control policy was reviewed and could not provide documentation of an annual review having been conducted.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff properly sealed, labeled, and dated food after opening; and 2. Staff removed expired items available for consumption. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Refrigerated Storage dated 01/2023, revealed the following, in part: Intent: To provide guidance related to safe storage of refrigerated foods. Guidelines: 10. Refrigerated foods should be properly covered, labeled, and dated. 11. Leftover food or unused portions of packaged foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. 15. Items leftover from tray line, such as poured milk or juice, will be labeled, and dated and used for the next meal. Such items will be discarded at the end of the day. On 01/05/2025 at 8:52 a.m., an observation of Refrigerator A made with S16DM revealed the following: 1. ¼ full, gallon of 2% reduced fat milk with an expiration date of 01/01/2025; 2. Two gallons of 2% reduced fat milk with an expiration date of 01/01/2025; 3. Five small containers of fruit, unlabeled and undated; and 4. ¾ full, large container of jelly, unlabeled and undated. On 01/05/2025 at 9:11 a.m., an observation of Refrigerator B made with S17DM revealed the following: 1. One loaf of bread, unlabeled and undated; 2. ½ used loaf of bread, unlabeled and undated; 3. ¼ used loaf of bread, unlabeled and undated; 4. 1/4 used, 1/5 pound of grated parmesan cheese, unsealed, open to air; 5. Five pound bag of feta cheese, unsealed, open to air; and 6. ¾ used, 16 ounce block of margarine, unsealed, open to air, and undated. On 01/05/2025 at 9:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with S17DM. She confirmed the above mentioned findings. S17DM confirmed stored foods should be properly labeled, dated, and sealed once opened. S17DM confirmed expired items should have been removed and not be available for consumption. On 01/12/2025 at 2:32 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADMIN. He stated all stored food should be labeled, dated, and sealed, once opened. S1ADMIN confirmed food with an expired dated should be removed and not be available for consumption.
Aug 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Laboratory Services (Tag F0770)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's laboratory tests were completed as ordered by ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's laboratory tests were completed as ordered by the physician for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents investigated. Findings: Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #3's current Physician's Orders revealed, in part: Order date 08/23/2024-CBC and CMP on Monday 08/26/2024. Further review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed no documented evidence, and the facility was unable to present any documented evidence Resident #3's CBC and CMP laboratory tests were completed as ordered by the physician on 08/26/2024. An interview was conducted on 08/27/2024 at 9:27 a.m. with S4RN. She stated S2DON just requested she obtain a CBC and a CMP on Resident #3, which was ordered to be obtained on 08/26/2024. An interview was conducted on 08/27/2024 at 9:30 a.m. with S2DON. She confirmed Resident #3 had a CBC and a CMP ordered to be obtained on 08/26/2024, and they were not.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a sanitary and comfortable environment for 1 (Hall A) of 2 hallways observed. The facility failed to en...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a sanitary and comfortable environment for 1 (Hall A) of 2 hallways observed. The facility failed to ensure floors were free from stains in Hall A. There were 75 licensed beds in the facility. Findings: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Resident Rights: Safe, Clean and Comfortable Environment dated March 2023 revealed the following: Purpose: The resident has a right to a safe, clean and comfortable environment. Guidelines: 4. The facility will provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortably interior. On 08/26/2024 at 9:40 a.m., an initial walk through the facility revealed the following: Hall A's floor had multiple brown and black stains around the nurse's station and throughout hallway. On 08/27/2024 at 9:25 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6HSUP. She stated she expected the hallway floors to be mopped daily. She stated S7HSK was responsible for mopping the hallways daily. An environmental tour was conducted with S6HSUP and she confirmed the multiple areas of brown and black stains in Hall A. She confirmed the stains should have been cleaned yesterday. On 08/27/2024 at 9:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S7HSK. He stated he was responsible for mopping all hallways and the entryway. He stated he was unable to mop both halls daily. S7HSK confirmed he worked 08/26/2024 and he did not mop Hall A and the floors were dirty. On 08/27/2024 at 1:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S8RD. The above listed floor stains were reviewed. He stated the floors on Hall A were cleaned yesterday and the facility needed time to mop the floors for the day. S8RD was informed of observations made of the stains noted in Hall A from yesterday morning which remained this morning.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. The facility failed to ensure dialysis communication ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. The facility failed to ensure dialysis communication forms were filled out completely for 2 of 2 (#1 and #2) residents sampled for dialysis. Findings: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Quality of Care: Dialysis dated 03/2023 revealed the following: Purpose: To provide residents with hemodialysis . that is consistent with professional standards of practice . Guidelines: 5. There will be ongoing communication and collaboration between the nursing home and dialysis staff for the development and implementation of the dialysis care plan. 8. The facility will assess the resident's condition and monitor for complications before and after dialysis treatments received . 9. There will be ongoing communication between the facility and the dialysis center reflected in the medical record. This communication may include .: c. Advanced Directives and Code Status . d. Nutritional/fluid management including documentation of weights, before, during and/or after dialysis 14. Facility and dialysis dieticians will coordinate the nutritional care .including identifying weight fluctuations due to fluid retention/depletion. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed an admit date of 07/31/2024 to the facility with diagnoses, which included Dependence of Renal Dialysis. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/03/2024 revealed Section O: Dialysis was checked. Review of Resident #1's current Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part: Dialysis Monday, Wednesday, Friday. Review of Resident #1's Pre Dialysis Assessment & Communication forms revealed incomplete communication for dates 08/02/2024 and 08/09/2024. Further review revealed no assessment and communication forms dated 08/05/2024, 08/07/2024 and 08/12/2024. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed an admit date of 10/13/2021 to the facility with diagnoses, which included End Stage Renal Disease. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/18/2024 revealed Section O: Dialysis was checked. Review of Resident #2's current Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part: Dialysis Monday, Wednesday, Friday. Review of Resident #2's Pre Dialysis Assessment & Communication forms revealed incomplete communication for August 2024. Further review revealed no documentation of post dialysis weights or code status. On 08/27/2024 at 9:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9LPN. S9LPN stated the nurses were expected to fill out the Pre Dialysis Assessment & Communication form prior to the resident leaving for dialysis treatment. S9LPN stated the communication sheet was kept in the Electronic Health Record or in a binder. On 08/27/2024 at 12:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated Resident #1 and Resident #2 received dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. S2DON confirmed the nurses are expected to fill out the Pre Dialysis Assessment & Communication form completely prior to the resident leaving for dialysis treatment. S2DON reviewed Resident #1 and Resident #2's Pre Dialysis Assessment & Communication form and confirmed the above mentioned dates were incomplete and/or missing. S2DON confirmed continuous documentation between the dialysis center and the facility was not documented and should have been.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents reviewed for baths. Findings: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Activities for Daily Living dated August 2023 revealed the following: Guidelines: 4.d. The decision to refuse care and treatment is documented in the medical record. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's Bath/Shower Logs revealed no documentation for a bath/shower given from 08/01/2024 through 08/14/2024. On 08/27/2024 at 11:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5CNA. She stated she was responsible for resident baths on her shift from 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. shift. She stated she gave Resident #1 his bed baths. She stated he refused his bed bath 2 or 3 times when he was first admitted . She stated she should have documented all baths given or refused on the bath/shower log. On 08/27/2024 at 11:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON reviewed Resident #1's bath/shower logs. She confirmed no documentation was completed on Resident #1 from 08/01/2024 through 08/14/2024 and should have been.
Jul 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of changes in condition for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of changes in condition for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility failed to notify Resident #2's Representative after identifying new right upper thigh, lower abdomen and right inner thigh wounds. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 03/2023 and titled, Resident Rights Notification of Changes of Condition revealed, in part: Purpose: Clarify the resident representative right to notification of significant changes in the resident's health status. Policy: The facility will keep the resident representative informed of significant changes in health status. Guidelines: 1. The facility will promptly inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify the resident representative, consistent with his or her authority, when there is: b. A significant change in the resident's physical . (i.e. deterioration in health .). Review of Resident #2's current Clinical Record revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of a Sacral Wound. Review of Resident #2's Skin and Wound-Total body Skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed 3 new wounds were identified by S2WCN. Review of Resident #2's nurse's notes from 06/19/2024 through 06/25/2024 revealed no documentation Resident #2's Representative (RP) was notified of the 3 newly identified wounds located on the right upper thigh, lower abdomen and right inner thigh. An interview was conducted on 07/16/2024 at 10:36 a.m. with Resident #2's RP. Resident #2's RP confirmed she was not notified of new wounds on Resident #2's right upper thigh, lower abdomen or right inner thigh by the facility. She stated she was made aware of the wounds on 06/25/2024 when the resident was admitted to the hospital. An interview was conducted on 07/17/2024 at 1:36 p.m. with S2WCN. S2WCN stated on 06/19/2024 she completed Resident #2's Skin and Wound-Total body Skin Assessment and identified three new wounds, which were located on her right upper thigh, lower abdomen and right inner thigh. She stated if she called Resident #2's RP, she would have documented the RP notification in the nurse's notes. S2WCN reviewed the nurse's notes and confirmed she did not document RP notification of Resident #2's three new wounds. S2WCN confirmed Resident #2's RP should have been notified when the three newly identified wounds were found on 06/19/2024 and was not. An interview was conducted on 07/18/2024 at 4:30 p.m. with S1DON. S1DON confirmed the nurse's should notify the RP immediately after identification of new wounds.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professiona...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents reviewed for wounds. The facility failed to ensure S2WCN, S3LPN and S4LPN documented wound care treatment administration for right upper thigh on Resident #2's Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 03/2023 and titled, Quality of Care Skin Integrity revealed, in part: Guidelines: 32. Pressure ulcers/ Pressure Injury documentation will include: g. dressing and treatments. Review of Resident #2's current Clinical Record revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's current Physician Orders revealed an order to cleanse the right upper thigh with wound cleanser, apply triad paste and cover with a clean dry dressing once daily beginning on 06/18/2024. Review of Resident #2's June 2024 Treatment Administration Record revealed the following, in part: 06/18/2024 at 5:00 a.m.: Cleanse right upper thigh with wound cleanser. Apply triad paste and cover with a clean dry dressing once daily. Further review revealed from 06/18/2024 to 06/21/2024 and 06/23/2024 to 06/25/2024 boxes were blank with no check marks or initials, which indicated no treatment documentation. An interview was conducted on 07/17/2024 at 1:36 p.m. with S2WCN. S2WCN stated she was the wound care nurse for Resident #2. S2WCN stated when wound care treatment was provided to the resident, she was responsible for documenting wound care completion as prompted in the resident's TAR. S2WCN reviewed Resident #2's TAR and confirmed the boxes on 06/18/2024, 06/20/2024, 06/21/2024 and 06/24/2024 at 5:00 a.m., were blank, which indicated the wound care treatment was not completed. S2WCN stated she provided wound care treatment for Resident #2's right upper thigh on the aforementioned dates and failed to document completion on the TAR. An interview was conducted on 07/18/2024 at 9:30 a.m. with S3LPN. S3LPN stated on 06/19/2024 she provided wound care for Resident #2. S3LPN stated when wound care treatment was provided to the resident, she was responsible for documenting wound care completion as prompted in the resident's TAR. S3LPN reviewed Resident #2's TAR and confirmed the box on 06/19/2024 at 5:00 a.m., was blank, which indicated the wound care treatment was not completed. S3LPN stated she provided wound care treatment for Resident #2's right upper thigh on the aforementioned date and failed to document completion on the TAR. An interview was conducted on 07/18/2024 at 1:40 p.m. with S4LPN. S4LPN stated on 06/22/2024 and 06/23/2024 she was the wound care nurse and provided wound care for Resident #2. S4LPN stated when wound care treatment was provided to the resident, she was responsible for documenting wound care completion as prompted in the resident's TAR. S4LPN reviewed Resident #2's TAR and confirmed the boxes on 06/22/2024 and 06/23/2024 at 5:00 a.m. were blank, which indicated that the wound care treatment was not completed. S4LPN stated she provided wound care treatment for Resident #2's right upper thigh on the aforementioned dates and failed to document completion on the TAR.
Jul 2024 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed implement a comprehensive person centered care plan to meet a reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed implement a comprehensive person centered care plan to meet a resident's needs for 1 (#73) of 18 sampled residents reviewed in final sample. The facility failed to ensure Resident #73's laboratory results were faxed to his physician. Findings: Review of Resident #73's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Malignant Neoplasm of Colon, Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Liver and Intrahepatic Bile Duct, and Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Lung. Review of Resident #73's current Physician Orders revealed, in part: 05/21/2024-CBC once weekly, CMP once weekly, Iron and TIBC every 4 weeks, Ferritin every 4 weeks, CEA every 4 weeks, fax results to oncologist's office. Review of Residents #73's current Care plan, revealed the following: Onset: 04/29/2024 Problem: The resident is receiving chemotherapy related to cancer Intervention: Obtain and monitor lab/ diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD and follow up as indicated. On 07/08/2024 at 12:04 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with Charge Nurse at Resident #73's oncologist office. She stated the protocol was for the facility to fax lab results prior to appointments so the physician could evaluate the lab results. She stated the facility was not faxing lab results as ordered. On 07/08/2024 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S11LPN. She reviewed Resident #73's orders and confirmed Resident #73 was to have weekly and monthly labs drawn and results faxed to oncologist's office. S11LPN stated she was not sure who was responsible for faxing Resident #73's lab results as ordered. On 07/08/2024 at 2:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated the floor nurses were capable of faxing Resident#73's lab results to his oncologist's office, but no one person had the sole responsibility to do so. S2DON stated S10ADON was responsible for ensuring Resident #73's lab results were being faxed. On 07/09/2024 at 10:11a.m., an interview was conducted with S10ADON. He stated he does not over see if staff faxed Resident #73's lab results to oncologist's office. S10ADON stated he usually gets a call from the oncologist's office requesting the lab results be sent over. He stated he only faxed the lab results if the oncologist's office called the facility requesting the results. S10ADON confirmed he expected staff to follow physician's orders and the lab results should have been faxed. On 07/09/2024 at 10:32 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. She confirmed she expected staff to follow all physician's orders. On 07/09/2024 at 1:04 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12NP. He stated he would expect staff to fax lab results to oncologist weekly and every 4 weeks as ordered. S12NP confirmed he expected to staff to follow all physician's orders.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure a resident attended their scheduled follow up appointment for 1 (#74) of 2 (#73 and #74) residents reviewed for medical appointments. Findings: Review of Resident #74's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Review of Resident #74's admission MDS with an ARD of 05/06/2024 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #74's Hospital Discharge Orders dated 05/01/2024 revealed the following, in part: Discharge to Skilled Nursing Facility Post Op appointment on 05/21/2024 at 1:15 p.m. with cardiothoracic surgery clinic. Review of Resident #74's Physician Orders dated May 2024-June 2024 revealed the following, in part: 06/11/2024-Follow up with surgeon at cardiothoracic surgery clinic. Review of Resident #74's Nurse's Notes dated May 2024-June 2024 revealed no evidence he attended the scheduled follow up appointment with the cardiothoracic surgeon on 05/21/2024 or 05/28/2024. Further review revealed he was admitted to a local hospital from [DATE]-[DATE]. Review of the facility's Emergency Transfer Log revealed Resident #74 was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. On 07/01/24 at 9:55 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #74. He stated he had a double bypass in April 2024. He stated he had not seen the cardiologist who performed his surgery for a follow up appointment. On 07/08/2024 at 11:47 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6WC. She stated she was responsible for scheduling resident's appointments. She stated Resident #74 had an appointment scheduled on 05/21/2024 to follow up with the cardiothoracic surgeon but he went to the hospital so she reschedule it for 05/28/2024. On 07/08/2024 at 1:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Registered Nurse at the cardiothoracic surgeon's office. She stated Resident #74 had a follow up appointment scheduled on 05/21/2024 with the surgeon, but it was cancelled. She stated a new appointment was scheduled for 05/28/2024 and Resident #74 did not show up. She stated no further follow up appointments were scheduled for the resident. On 07/08/2024 at 2:08 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6WC. She reviewed the facility's Emergency Transfer Log dated May 2024 and verified Resident #74 was out of the facility on 05/28/2024 at the hospital, and was not in the hospital on [DATE]. She stated she did not know why she rescheduled his appointment from 05/21/2024 to 05/28/2024. She stated when a resident missed a follow up appointment due to being hospitalized , she rescheduled it when the resident returned to the facility. She stated she should have rescheduled the follow up appointment after Resident #74 returned from the hospital and did not. She reviewed the physician order placed on 06/11/2024 to make a follow up appointment with the cardiothoracic surgeon. She stated she was unaware of the order. She reviewed her appointment book and confirmed she did not schedule an appointment for Resident #74 to see the cardiothoracic surgeon after the order was placed on 06/11/2024. On 07/08/2024 at 2:25 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated S6WC was responsible for making resident's medical appointments. She reviewed Resident #74's discharge papers from the hospital dated 05/01/2024 and verified he had a post-operative appointment scheduled on 05/21/2024. She was notified the appointment was rescheduled to 05/28/2024. She reviewed the facility's May 2024 Emergency Transfer Log and verified Resident #74 was at the hospital on [DATE]. She confirmed a follow up surgical appointment should have been made when Resident #74 returned from the hospital. She was notified of the physician order placed on 06/11/2024 to make Resident #74 a follow up appointment with the cardiothoracic surgeon. She confirmed the appointment should have been made when the order was placed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0806 (Tag F0806)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to provide food that accommodated the resident's food pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to provide food that accommodated the resident's food preference for 1 (#26) of 2 (#26 and #73) of residents reviewed for food accommodations/preference. Findings: Review of Resident #26's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/30/2024 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. On 07/01/2024 at 9:29 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #26. Resident #26 stated an employee spoke with him a few weeks ago about food preferences. He stated he could not recall the name of the employee. Resident #26 stated he requested chef salads every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for supper and had not received them. On 07/01/2024 at 4:55 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #26's supper tray. Resident #26 was served chicken tenders and French fries. An observation was made of Resident #26's supper meal ticket dated Monday, July 1, 2024. It read, Prefers: No preferences. On 07/02/2024 at 8:42 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4RDM. She confirmed Resident #26 food preference was chef salads every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. S4RDM was presented with the observation of Residents #26 supper tray and meal ticket on 07/01/2024. She confirmed Resident #26 should have received a chef salad on 07/01/2024 and he did not. On 07/08/2024 at 3:43 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. She stated when the dietary manager assessed the residents quarterly for food preferences, they should enter the information into the system so it transferred to their meal ticket. She was notified of the aforementioned findings. She confirmed if a resident had a food preference, the dietary manager should have transferred the information to the meal ticket so kitchen staff could have accommodated the preference. She confirmed Resident #26 should have received a chef salad on 07/01/2024.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct food portions...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct food portions and snacks as ordered by a physician for 1 (#73) of 18 sampled residents reviewed in final sample. Findings: Review of Resident #73's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Malignant Neoplasm of Colon, Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Liver and Intrahepatic Bile Duct, and Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Lung. Review of the current Physician Orders revealed, in part: Start date 04/19/2024-Regular / NAS diet, regular texture, thin consistency, recommend snacks BID between meals for weight stability. Double portions with all meals for increased kilocalorie and protein. Review of the most recent Care Plan revealed, in part: Onset: 04/13/2024 Problem: NAS Regular Diet-At risk for weight loss related to diagnosis of cancer Intervention: Provide, serve diet as ordered. Review of the facility's Diet Type Report dated 07/08/2024 revealed, in part: Resident #73, Regular/NAS Diet, regular texture, additional directions: recommend snacks BID between meals for weight stability. Double portions with all meals for increased kilocalorie and protein. On 07/02/2024 at 8:05 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #73's breakfast tray. The tray did not contain double portions. Review of Resident #73's dietary slip dated 07/02/2024 read regular portion. On 07/08/2024 at 10:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #73. He stated he did not receive snacks twice a day. On 07/08/2024 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S11LPN. She stated S10ADON was responsible for dietary orders. S11LPN stated she was not aware Resident #73 had an order for BID snacks between meals, and Resident #73 had not received them and should have. On 07/09/2024 at 10:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with S13CNA. She stated Resident #73 received regular portions. She stated Resident #73 did not receive BID snacks. On 07/08/2024 at 10:15 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S14RD. She stated nutritional interventions are communicated to the staff via a discussion with the NP, DON, or ADON. She stated she sent recommendations at the end of the day via spread sheet to MDS, DON, ADON, and ADM. She stated her last visit for Resident #73 was on 06/28/2024, and she recommended BID snacks between meals and double portion meals. S14RD confirmed she would expect the dietary slip to read double portions as ordered and for the resident to receive BID snacks. On 07/08/2024 at 1:56 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4RDM. She stated any changes to dietary recommendations should be documented in the electronic system by the nurses. S4RDM reviewed Resident #73's dietary orders and stated S14RD made changes to Resident #73's diet on 06/28/2024 which included snacks BID between meals for weight stability and double portions with all meals for increased kilocalorie and protein. S4RDM reviewed Resident #73's dietary slip and confirmed the dietary slip read regular portion and should have read double portions. S4RDM stated kitchen staff were responsible for supplying BID snacks between meals and had not been. On 07/08/2024 at 2:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated the protocol for dietary recommendations was for S14RD to make the recommendations, the recommendations were then reviewed by MD/NP, and S10ADON was then responsible for inputting orders into the computer and communicating changes with the dietary department. On 07/08/2024 at 2:31 p.m., an interview was conducted with S10ADON. He stated the protocol for dietary recommendations was S14RD emailed the recommendations, the NP acknowledged in agreement with the recommendations, and he was then responsible for inputting orders into the computer and communicating changes with the dietary department. On 07/09/2024 at 1:04 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12NP. He stated the protocol when S14RD made dietary recommendations was for the orders to be changed in the computer and changes communicated with the dietary department. S12NP confirmed he expected staff to follow the dietary recommendations and physician's order. On 07/09/2024 at 10:32 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. She stated she expected staff to follow all physician's orders. S1ADM confirmed she expected staff to follow all therapeutic diet orders.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies for 1 of 1 (Med room [ROOM NUMBER]) medication storage room and 2 (Med Cart B and Med Cart C) of 3 (Med Cart A, Med Cart B, and Med Cart C) medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This had the potential to affect the 19 residents who received insulin in the facility. Findings: Review of facility's Plan of Action/Continuous Quality Improvement, dated [DATE], revealed, in part, the following: Problem Area Identified: Medication storage. Actions: S2DON or designee to audit medication storage rooms and medication carts once weekly for 8 weeks, then monthly thereafter. Review of the facility's Medication Storage Room and Medication Cart Audit Logs, dated [DATE] revealed no audit was conducted on [DATE]. An observation made on [DATE] at 11:00 a.m. of Med Cart C with S9LPN revealed the following: 2-Novolog Flex Pens opened, unlabeled, and undated. 1-Lantus insulin pen opened, unlabeled, and undated. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 11:01 a.m. with S9LPN. She confirmed multi-dose insulin pens expired 28 days after opening, and the aforementioned pens should have been discarded. An observation made on [DATE] at 11:10 a.m. of Med Cart B with S8LPN revealed the following: 1-vial of Lantus insulin opened, with an open date of [DATE]. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 11:11 a.m. with S8LPN. She confirmed multi-dose insulin vials expired 28 days after opening, and the aforementioned vial should have been discarded. An observation made on [DATE] at 10:30 a.m. of Med room [ROOM NUMBER] with S10ADON revealed the following: 1-Novolog Flex Pen opened, unlabeled, and undated. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 10:45 a.m. with S10ADON. He confirmed multi-dose insulin vials expired 28 days after opening. He confirmed insulin pens should have a label and an open date. S10ADON confirmed the aforementioned Novolog Flex Pen should have been labeled and dated, and was not. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 12:47 p.m. with S2DON. She stated medication storage was being audited once a week on Sundays for 8 weeks, then monthly thereafter. She confirmed the audit for [DATE] was missed resulting in expired and unlabeled insulin being available for resident use in medication carts and in the medication storage room. She confirmed their QA/QAPI system had not been effective. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 12:48 p.m. with S1ADM. She stated medication storage was being audited once a week on Sundays for 8 weeks, then monthly thereafter. She confirmed the audit for [DATE] was missed resulting in expired and unlabeled insulin being available for resident use in medication carts and in the medication storage room.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's sta...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (#52 and #80) residents out of a total of 21 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #52 was coded correctly for PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review); and 2. Resident #80 was coded correctly for discharge. Findings: Resident #52 Review of Resident #52's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #52's OBH-Level II Evaluation Summary & Determination Notice dated 04/22/2024 revealed under recommendations: The individual has a serious mental illness and is recommended nursing home admission. Review of Resident #52's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/04/2024 revealed Section A1500 PASRR: Is the resident currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition, was coded as 0. No. Section A1510 Level II PASRR conditions was blank. Resident #80 Review of Resident #80's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 05/17/2024. Review of Resident #80's Discharge MDS with an ARD of 05/17/2024 revealed Section A2105 Discharge Status: Short Term General Hospital. Review of Resident #80's Physician Orders dated 05/17/2024 included the following: Discharge home. Continue medications as ordered. Follow up with infectious disease and Primary Care Provider. Order Home health Review of Resident #80's Nurse's Note dated 05/17/2024 at 2:57 p.m. revealed the following, in part: Resident set to discharge this afternoon, discharge orders put in system by Nurse Practitioner. Resident will be followed and discharged with order for home health. Resident was in wheelchair and was rolled out with sister. Resident left the building. Signed, S7LPN On 07/09/2024 at 10:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5MDS. She stated she was responsible for completing resident's MDS assessments. She reviewed Resident #52's PASRR Level II dated 04/22/2024 indicating he had a serious mental illness. She reviewed Resident #52's Annual MDS with an ARD of 06/04/2024. She confirmed Section A1500 was not coded as yes and should have been. She stated Resident #80 was discharged home. She reviewed the nurse's notes and verified he was discharged home in May 2024. She reviewed Resident #80's Discharge MDS, Section A2105. She confirmed Resident #80 was coded as being discharged to the hospital and should have been coded as being discharged home. On 07/09/2024 at 11:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She reviewed the aforementioned findings and confirmed MDS assessments should be coded correctly.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to ensure insulin pen needles were primed prior to administration of insulin per manufactures guidelines for 2 (#17 and #42) of 3 (#17, #42, and #48) residents observed for insulin administration. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy Services Medication Administration dated 03/2023, revealed the following, in part: 2. Medications will be prepared and administered in accordance with: b. Manufacturer's specifications. Review of the insulin lispro's manufacturer insert revealed the following, in part: Preparing your Pen: Step 4: Push the capped needle straight onto the pen and twist the needle on until it is tight. Priming your Pen: Prime before each injection. Priming your pen means removing the air from the needle and cartridge that may collect during normal use and ensures that the pen is working correctly. If you do not prime before each injection, you may get too much or too little insulin. Step 6: To prime your pen, turn the dose knob to select 2 units. Step 7: Hold your pen with the needle pointing up. Tap the cartridge holder gently to collect air bubbles at the top. Step 8: Continue holding your pen with needle pointing up. Push the dose knob in until it stops, and 0 is seen in the dose window. Hold the dose knob in and count to 5 slowly. Review of the insulin aspart's manufacturer insert revealed the following, in part: Preparing your pen: B. Attaching the needle: Giving the airshot before each injection: Before each injection small amounts of air may collect in the cartridge during normal use. To avoid injecting air and to ensure proper dosing: E. Turn the dose selector to select 2 units. F. Hold your pen with the needle pointing up. Tap the cartridge gently with your finger a few times to make any air bubbles collect at the top of the cartridge. G. Keep the needle pointing upwards, press the push-button all the way in. The dose selector returns to 0. Resident #17 Review of Resident #17's current Physician Orders revealed, in part, an order for insulin lispro subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/mL, inject 19 units subcutaneously before meals. On 07/02/2024 at 11:30 a.m., an observation was made of S9LPN preparing and administering Resident #17's insulin lispro. S9LPN dialed up 19 units of insulin lispro. S9LPN did not prime the insulin pen needle prior to administering insulin to Resident #17. On 07/02/2024 at 11:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9LPN. S9LPN confirmed she did not prime the insulin pen needle prior to dialing the insulin dose. S9LPN stated priming the insulin pen needle was not required. Resident #42 Review of Resident #42's current Physician Orders revealed, in part, an order for insulin aspart solution 100 unit/mL subcutaneous per sliding scale before meals and an order for insulin aspart solution 100 unit/mL, inject 3 units subcutaneously every 4 hours. On 07/09/2024 at 11:20 a.m., an observation was made of S15LPN preparing and administering Resident #42's insulin aspart. S15LPN dialed up 5 units of insulin aspart. S15LPN did not prime the insulin pen needle prior to administering insulin to Resident #42. On 07/09/2024 at 11:22 a.m., an interview was conducted with S15LPN. S15LPN stated Resident #42 required a total of 5 units of insulin due to sliding scale and scheduled insulin. S15LPN confirmed she did not prime the insulin pen needle prior to dialing the insulin dose. S15LPN stated priming the insulin pen needle was not required. On 07/09/2024 at 12:02 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She reviewed both insulin pen needle manufactures inserts and confirmed both insulin pen needles required a priming of 2 units of insulin into the needle prior to administering the appropriate amount of insulin.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs were stored and labeled properly in ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs were stored and labeled properly in accordance with current accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Insulin pens containing multiple doses of insulin were clearly labeled with resident's name and other identifiers to verify the correct pen was used on the correct resident and an open date in 1(Med Cart C) of 3 medication carts (Med Cart A, B, and C) reviewed; 2. Multi-dose vial medications were discarded within 28 days of opening on 2 (Med Carts B and Med Cart C) of 3 medication carts (Med Cart A, B, and C) reviewed; 3. Insulin pens containing multiple doses of insulin were clearly labeled with resident's name, other identifiers, and an open date in 1(Med room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 1 medication room's refrigerator reviewed; and 4. Med Cart B was clean and free of loose pills in 1(Med Cart B) of 3 medication carts (Med Cart A, B, and C) reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Labeling and Storage of Drugs and Biologicals, dated 03/2023 revealed, in part, the following: Policy: Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. Guidelines: 4. Medication labeling and biologicals dispensed by the pharmacy must be consistent with applicable federal and state requirements and currently accepted pharmaceutical principles and practices. 8. If a multi-dose vial has been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured), the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days. 1. On [DATE] at 11:00 a.m., an observation was made of Med Cart C with S9LPN, which revealed the following: 2-Novolog Flex Pens were opened and unlabeled. 1-Lantus insulin pen was opened and unlabeled. On [DATE] at 11:01 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9LPN. She stated some insulin pens come with labels and some do not. S9LPN confirmed all insulin pens should be labeled by pharmacy, dated when opened, and were not. 2. On [DATE] at 11:00 a.m., an observation was made of Med Cart C with S9LPN, which revealed the following: 1-vial of Lispro insulin was opened with an open date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:01 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9LPN. She confirmed insulin multi-dose vials expired 28 days after opening, and this vial should have been discarded. On [DATE] at 11:10 a.m., an observation was made of Review of Med Cart B with S8LPN, which revealed the following: 1-vial of Lantus insulin was opened and with an open date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:11 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8LPN. She confirmed insulin multi-dose vials expired 28 days after opening, and this vial should have been discarded. 3. On [DATE] at 10:30 a.m., an observation was made of Med room [ROOM NUMBER] with S10ADON, which revealed the following: 1-Novolog Flex Pen opened, unlabeled, and undated. On [DATE] at 10:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10ADON. He confirmed insulin multi-dose vials expired 28 days after opening. He confirmed insulin pens should have a label and an open date. S10ADON confirmed the Novolog Flex Pen should have had a label and an open date, and it did not. 4. On [DATE] at 11:10 a.m., an observation was made of Review of Med Cart B with S8LPN, which revealed the following: 1-Oblong blue colored capsule loose in cart. 1-Round peach colored tablet loose in cart. On [DATE] at 11:11 a.m., an interview was conducted with S8LPN. She confirmed both medications were loose in cart and should not have been. On [DATE] at 1:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. She stated that multi-dose vials expired 28 days after opening. She confirmed the vials of insulin should have been removed. She stated insulin pens should be labeled with the resident's name. S2DON confirmed there should not be any loose pills on the medication carts.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors. This defic...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 80 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy dated 03/2023 and titled Posted Nurse Staffing Information revealed in part, the following: Policy: At the beginning of each shift, on a daily basis, the facility will post: 1. The facility name 2. The current date 3. The total number and the actual hours worked 4. Resident census Guidelines: 1. The information posted will be up to date and current. An observation was made on 07/01/2024 at 10:00 a.m. of the facility. No staffing data sheets observed. An interview was conducted on 07/01/2024 at 10:05 a.m. with S16HR. She stated she was responsible for posting staffing data sheets. She stated the last daily staffing data sheet completed was 06/27/2024. An interview was conducted on 07/01/2024 at 10:06 a.m. with S1ADM. She stated the last daily staffing data sheet completed was 06/27/2024.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provisio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: Review of Resident #3's Clinical Record revealed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cough and Functional Dyspepsia. Review of Resident #3's MDS with an ARD of 02/08/2024 revealed he had a BIMS of 15, which indicated Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date 11/01/2023 - Wash CPAP mask in warm water and soap. Rinse well and pat dry. Allow to completely air dry every day shift. Start date 11/01/2023 - Wash CPAP tubing in warm water and soap. Rinse well and pat dry. Allow to completely air dry, every day shift, every Tuesday. Review of Resident #3's MAR dated February 2024 revealed the following, in part: Wash CPAP mask in warm water and soap. Rinse well and pat dry. Allow to completely air dry every day shift. Signed as completed by S2LPN on 03/12/2024. Wash CPAP tubing in warm water and soap. Rinse well and pat dry. Allow to completely air dry every day shift every Tuesday. Signed as completed by S2LPN on 03/12/2024. An observation was made on 03/12/2024 at 10:15 a.m. of Resident #3 in his room. Observed Resident #3's CPAP mask and tubing on the night stand. Observed a white and brown substance located inside the CPAP mask. Observed a white substance located inside Resident #3's CPAP tubing. An interview was conducted on 03/12/2024 at 10:17 a.m. with Resident #3 in his room. He stated his CPAP mask and CPAP tubing had not been cleaned on 03/12/2024. An interview was conducted on 03/12/2024 at 10:30 a.m. with S2LPN. She reviewed the MAR for Resident #3. She confirmed the MAR for 03/12/2024 revealed she cleaned both the CPAP mask and CPAP tubing. She stated she was not aware Resident #3 had a cleaning ordered for his CPAP tubing or the frequency. She confirmed she had not completed these tasks on 03/12/2024. She stated she should not have documented these tasks as completed until she completed the task. An interview was conducted on 03/12/2024 at 10:55 a.m. with S1DON. She reviewed the MAR for Resident #3. She confirmed the MAR for 03/12/2024 revealed S2LPN signed for cleaning both the CPAP mask and CPAP tubing. She stated S2LPN should not have documented these tasks as completed until she completed the task.
Dec 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help preven...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Hand hygiene was performed by staff before distribution of meal trays for 3 (R1, R2, and R3) of 4 (#2, R1, R2, and R3) residents observed during meal pass; 2. Previously used dirty eating utensils and napkins were not reused for 3 (R1, R2, and R3) of 4 (#2, R1, R2, and R3) residents observed during meal pass; and 3. Food items were not reused for resident consumption for 1 (Hall 1) of 4 Halls (Hall 1, Hall 2, Hall 3, and Hall 4) observed during meal disposal. This had the potential to effect 64 residents who were served meals from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene revealed the following, in part: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene revealed the following, in part: Policy: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility. Definitions: Hand hygiene is a general term for cleaning your hands by handwashing with soap and water or the use of an antiseptic hand rub, also known as alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR). Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice. 2. Alcohol-based hand rub with 60 to 95% alcohol is the preferred method for cleaning hands in most clinical situations. 1. An observation was made on 12/04/2023 at 12:15 p.m. of S5LPN distributing lunch trays to R1, R2, and R3 in their rooms. S5LPN was observed entering all residents' rooms, setting down a meal tray in the residents' room, exiting the room, and picking up the next meal tray. No observations were made of hand hygiene being performed before or after. There were alcohol-based hand rub dispensers located inside R1, R2, and R3's rooms as well as 2 dispensers located between the residents' rooms in the hallway. An interview was conducted on 12/04/2023 at 12:18 p.m. with S5LPN. She confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene prior to passing out residents' lunch trays or between residents and should have. An interview was conducted on 12/04/2023 at 12:22 p.m. with S3ADON. She confirmed all staff members should perform hand hygiene prior to passing out residents' meal trays and after exiting each resident's room. An interview was conducted on 12/04/2023 at 12:25 p.m. with S2DON. She confirmed all staff members should perform hand hygiene prior to passing out residents' meal trays and after exiting each resident's room. 2. An observation was made on 12/04/2023 at 8:20 a.m. in the kitchen. S9DA emptied partially consumed residents' dirty breakfast trays and placed unopened items into a stainless steel tray. The following items were observed in this stainless steel tray: 4 unopened butter spreads, 5 unopened grape jelly packets, 2 unopened salt packets, and 4 white napkins wrapped around utensils with a splattered brown and yellow substance noted on the napkin. An observation was made on 12/04/2023 at 8:55 a.m. in the kitchen. S9DA emptied partially consumed residents' dirty breakfast trays and placed unopened items into a stainless steel tray The following items were observed in this stainless steel tray: 15 unopened butter spreads, 15 unopened grape jelly packets, 10 unopened salt packets, and 12 white napkins wrapped around utensils with a splattered brown and yellow substance noted on napkin. S9DA carried the stainless steel tray with the unopened items to a counter in the kitchen where a storage bin was located with other unopened jelly packets, utensils wrapped in napkins, butter spreads, and salt packets. S9DA then sorted through the unopened dirty items and placed them into the storage bin to be reused for another resident's meal tray. An interview was conducted on 12/04/2023 at 9:00 a.m. with S9DA. S9DA stated when she emptied partially consumed dirty resident trays, she placed any unopened condiments or wrapped utensils in the stainless steel tray and then placed them into the storage bin for future resident use. She stated the kitchen staff do not disinfect any of these items prior to placing them into the storage bin or prior to future resident use. S9DA observed the yellow and brown substance on the napkins wrapped around the utensils and stated the splattered substance was food from the partially consumed resident meal trays. She did not remove any of these items from the storage bins after interview. An observation was made on 12/04/2023 at 11:40 a.m. in the kitchen. S9DA removed 3 utensils wrapped in napkins, which were noted to be splattered with a yellow and brown substance, from the storage bin and placed them on 3 resident's (R1, R2, R3) lunch trays. The lunch trays were then loaded into a rolling cart and sent to Hall 1 to be served. An observation was made on 12/04/2023 at 12:20 p.m. of S5LPN passing lunch trays. S5LPN placed R1, R2, and R3's lunch trays in their rooms. The 3 residents' utensils were wrapped in a napkin soiled with a splattered yellow and brown substance on them. 3. An observation was made on 12/04/2023 at 1:15 p.m. in the kitchen. S9DA emptied partially consumed residents' dirty lunch trays and placed unopened items into the stainless steel tray. The following unopened items were observed in this stainless steel tray: 15 opened bags of cornbread, 5 white napkins wrapped around utensils with a splattered brown and yellow substance noted on napkin, and 7 cups of lemonade with plastic lids. An interview was conducted on 12/04/2023 at 1:17 p.m. with S9DA. She stated she was instructed by S8DA to place any unused or uneaten food items in the stainless steel tray for reuse in future meals for residents. She stated she was going to place the previously served cups of lemonade in the refrigerator, reuse the wrapped napkins with utensils, and reuse the cornbread. S9DA stated she did not know if the residents had touched or consumed any of the items that were being reused. An interview was conducted on 12/04/2023 at 1:22 p.m. with S8DA. She stated condiments, utensils, drinks, and food from partially consumed dirty resident's meal trays should have been disposed of and not available for resident reuse. An interview was conducted on 12/04/2023 at 1:23 p.m. with S7DM. She stated condiments, utensils, drinks, and food from partially consumed dirty resident's meal trays should have been disposed of and not available for resident reuse. An interview was conducted on 12/04/2023 at 1:30 p.m. with S4IP. He confirmed all staff members should perform hand hygiene prior to distributing residents' meal trays and after exiting each resident's room. He confirmed staff should not to reuse food items because reusing them would be an infection control risk. An interview was conducted on 12/04/2023 at 1:40 p.m. with S1ADM. She confirmed all staff members should perform hand hygiene prior to passing out residents' meal trays and after exiting each resident's room. She stated it was unacceptable for utensils or food items to be reused. She confirmed all of these items should have been disposed of and not available for resident reuse. She confirmed reusing food items would be an infection control risk.
Oct 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure the residents had a clean and safe, home-like...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure the residents had a clean and safe, home-like environment for 1 (#1) of 5 residents (#1, #2, #3, #R1, and #R2) sampled for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's air conditioner unit was cleaned and free of debris. Findings: Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Unspecified Asthma with Acute Exacerbation. The facility's current MDS assessment of Resident #1's cognitive status revealed he was cognitively intact. An observation was made of Room a on 10/25/2023 at 8:45 a.m. Resident #1 was present in the room. An observation of the air conditioner unit vent revealed a copious amount of a gray, fluffy substance. The inside grille within the vent also had a copious amount of a thick, brownish/red substance throughout. An observation was made of Room a on 10/26/2023 at 8:42 a.m. Resident #1 was present in the room. An observation of the air conditioner unit vent revealed a copious amount of a gray, fluffy substance. The inside grille within the vent also had a copious amount of a thick, brownish/red substance throughout. An interview was conducted with Resident #1 on 10/26/2023 at 8:43 a.m. Resident #1 stated no one had cleaned his air conditioner unit and it had been dirty for a long time. An interview was conducted with S2MS on 10/26/2023 at 2:00 p.m. in Resident #1's room. S2MS inspected Resident #1's air conditioner vent in Room a and removed the two air filters within the air conditioner unit. S2MS stated he was responsible for checking residents' air conditioner units and cleaning the filters monthly. S2MS confirmed there was a gray fluffy and brownish/red substance throughout the air filters and grille of the air conditioner unit. S2MS identified the substances as dust and sludge and rust from condensation. S2MS stated he was unaware of the condition of Resident #1's air conditioner unit. S2MS verified there was no log of a cleaning schedule for the air conditioners within the facility. S2MS confirmed Resident #1's air conditioner unit was dirty and unsanitary and needed to be cleaned. An interview was conducted with S1ADM on 10/26/2023 at 2:20 p.m. in Resident #1's room. S1ADM inspected Resident #1's air conditioner unit in Room a. S1ADM verified both air filters had a copious amount of a gray, fluffy substance. S1ADM also verified the air conditioner vent area contained a brownish/red substance on the grille. S1ADM confirmed Resident #1's air conditioner vent and two air filters were unsanitary, dirty, and should have been maintained and clean.
Oct 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents remained as free of accident h...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents remained as free of accident hazards as possible for each resident who was transported in the facility's van via wheelchair for 1 (#1) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, and #R5) residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to secure Resident #1's safety (belt) during transport as recommended by manufacturer guidelines. This failed practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #1 on 09/20/2023 when S2VD failed to properly restrain Resident #1 into the facility van. During transport, Resident #1 slid out of her wheelchair onto the van floor. Resident #1 was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE] where x-ray revealed a Left Tibia Plateau Fracture extending to the Proximal Tibial Metaphysis. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the manufacture's user instructions for passenger lap belt use revealed, in part: B. Secure Passenger 1. Attach lap belts-Use integrated stiffeners to feed belts through openings between seat backs and bottoms, and/or armrest to ensure proper belt fit around occupant. a. On the aisle side, attach belt with female buckle to rear tie-down pin connector; ensuring buckle rest on passenger's hip. b. On the window-side, attach belt with male tongue to rear tie-down pin connector and insert into female buckle. 2. Attach Shoulder Belt-Extent shoulder belt over passenger's shoulder and across upper torso, and fasten pin connector onto lap belt. Note: Combination lap/shoulder belts serve as both window-side lap belt and shoulder belt. 3. Ensure belts are adjusted as firmly as possible, but consistent with user comfort. Resident #1 Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Paraplegia. Review of the Quarterly MDS with and ARD of 09/19/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated the resident was cogitatively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 required a wheelchair for locomotion. Review of the facility's investigation revealed the following: Incident Date: 09/20/2023 Incident Occurred Time: 2:45 p.m. Incident Description: On 09/20/2023, Resident #1 had an appointment at 1:30 p.m. with pain management for her baclofen pump. She was picked up at approximately 2:30 p.m. by van driver in the company van. Van driver secured Resident #1's wheelchair with the straps but failed to put the seat belt around Resident #1 before driving off. When van driver was driving towards the interstate, he approached a red light and had to break hard causing Resident #1 to slide forward out of her wheelchair. Resident #1 landed on her buttock facing the back of the van with her legs in front of her. Van driver pulled over, questioned Resident #1 and asked if she was hurt. Resident #1 stated, I'm fine. I'm not hurting. Van driver and CNA placed Resident #1 back in her wheelchair. Her wheelchair was secured and the seat belt was placed around her. Van driver then stopped to pick up another resident from dialysis and returned to the facility around 4:20 p.m. with both residents. The incident was reported to the Administrator upon their return. The nurse assigned to Resident #1 was instructed by the Administrator to assess her due to the fall. One knee was swollen and Resident #1 was saying her back and leg was hurting. The nurse got an order from her physician and sent her to the emergency room. Review of emergency room Medical Records dated 09/20/2023 revealed Resident #1 was evaluated and found to have left tibia plateau fracture as well as possible left proximal fibular fracture. Resident #1 was treated for pain, had a left long leg splint applied, and was released in stable condition to return to the Nursing Home. On 10/11/2023 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. Resident #1 stated, on 09/20/2023, she was transported in the facility's transport van. She explained the van driver slammed on the brakes which caused her to fall out of her wheelchair. Resident #1 stated, she was taken to the hospital where it was discovered she had a broken left leg which required a soft cast. On 10/11/2023 at 3:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2VD. S2VD stated on 09/20/2023 he loaded Resident #1 into the facility van. S2VD stated he was in a hurry and forgot to secure Resident #1's seat belt. S2VD stated during transport he approached a red light and applied the brakes hard which brought the van to a stop. S2VD stated after he stopped he observed Resident #1 lying on the van floor between the driver and passenger seat. He stated he picked Resident #1 up off the floor, placed her in the seat, then drove her to the facility. On 10/16/2023 at 11:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. S1ADM stated S2VD reported on 09/20/2023 that he stopped at a red light and Resident #1 slid out of her wheelchair. S1ADM stated S2VD stated he got in a hurry and forgot to secure Resident #1's seatbelt. S1ADM confirmed all van drivers should secure wheelchair and resident's seatbelt, shoulder harness and tie downs per facility policy. The facility has implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: QA Review revealed: On 09/20/2023 the following plan of correction was put into place to include the following: A. Immediate action taken: Resident #1 was assessed by the nurse. Knee was swollen and she complained of back and leg pain. Nurse sent resident to the ER. Physician and family notified. B. All residents of this facility who were transported by the facility van had the potential to be affected by this deficient practice. C. Actions taken/systems put into place to reduce the risk of future occurrences include: 1. Van drivers were educated on transportation policy and procedure. Completed 09/20/2023 2. Drivers were educated that they must secure the wheelchair in the van and they must use the seat belt around the resident during every transport. Completed 09/20/2023 3. Drivers educated that if a fall occurs while out of the building and in their care, they are to immediately pull over, if driving, call the Administrator or DON for instructions or call 911 for an emergency. Completed 09/20/2023 4. Van drivers were educated on using the safety straps in van to secure the wheelchair and using the seat belt to secure the resident when transporting (Video). Completed 09/20/2023 5. Staff had to demonstrate loading and unloading a wheelchair in the van. Completed 09/20/2023 6. Drivers had a competency completed. Completed 09/20/2023 7. Drivers took education on Assisting residents with transportation, and took a test. D. How corrective actions will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur: Administrator/designee began monitoring on 09/20/2023 and 09/21/2023 for all residents transported in the van and will continue monitoring 3 x's weekly for one month to ensure drivers are securing the wheelchair using the straps and securing the resident using the seat belt properly and documenting. Results of monitoring will be brought to the QAPI committee. E. Completion date: 09/21/2023 The facility was found to be in compliance as of 09/21/2023. On 10/11/2023 at 2:30 p.m., an observation was made of S3VD, with R6 and R7 loaded in the facility van. Both residents were properly secured and the van driver was knowledgeable and competent in use of safety equipment required in transporting residents. On 10/11/2023 at 3:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2VD. He was able to explain the proper way to secure residents for transport following the manufacture's procedures for securing residents. On 10/11/2023 at 3:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3VD. He was able to explain the proper way to secure residents for transport following the manufacture's procedures for securing residents.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, were reported...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Random Resident #2) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, Random Resident #1, Random Resident #2, Random Resident #3) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: A review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect an Exploitation Policy revealed the following: Definitions: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Instances of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enable through the use of technology. Verbal Abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communication or sounds that willfully include disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. VII. Reporting Response: A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violation to Administrator. If applicable it will be reported to state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes as noted by state agency. A review of the clinical record for Random Resident #2 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Hemiplegia, Neurologic Neglect Syndrome, Dysphagia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Epilepsy, Alcohol Dependence, in remission. A review of the admission Assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/08/2023 revealed Random Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. A review of the facility's Incident Log dated 06/19/2023-09/12/2023 revealed on 09/09/2023 at 3:30 p.m., an incident was filed involving Random Resident #2. On 09/09/2023 at 3:30 p.m., S2LPN notified S1ADM of an incident involving Random Resident #2 and Resident #2. On 09/09/2023 at 3:30 p.m. S2LPN completed a facility incident report. Category: Physical contact, verbal contact Describe injury: Threw water on Random Resident #2 Location of Occurrence: Activity Room Equipment in use: None Property Involved: Cup of water Incident Level: Assault to another resident, throwing item at resident Incident Reported by: Certified Nurse Assistance and other resident Associate Involved: None Notified Physician: Nurse Practitioner on 09/09/2023 at 3:30 p.m. Notified Family: Responsible Party called with no return call Narrative of incident and description of injuries: Resident #2 and Random Resident #2 were in activity room and had verbal altercation regarding television channel. Resident #2 threw a full cup of water at Random Resident #2. Narrative of incident and description of injuries: Resident #2 and Random Resident #2 were in activity room and had verbal altercation regarding television channel. Resident #2 threw a full cup of water at Random Resident #2. An interview was conducted with Random Resident #2 on 9/14/2023 at 10:45 a.m. an interview was conducted. He stated he had an issue with Resident #2 that threw water on him a few weeks ago. He stated he was in the activity room watching television when Resident #2 started throwing water at a window near him, when he told Resident #2 he could not throw water, Resident #2 then threw a cup of water on his lap. He stated he tries to avoid Resident #2 as best he can. An interview was conducted with S1ADM on 09/14/2023 at 10:45 a.m. She stated she was notified of the incident involving Random Resident #2 and Resident #2 on 09/09/2023 immediately after the incident occurred. She verified this incident was a resident to resident abuse allegation and should have been reported within 2 hours to the state agency. She confirmed that she did not report the incident to the state agency. .
Aug 2023 5 deficiencies 3 IJ (3 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in acc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan by failing to ensure: 1.) Nurses administered medications as ordered for 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #R1, #R2, and #R3) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, # 5, #R1, #R2, and #R3) residents reviewed; 2.) Changes in Respiratory orders were communicated with Respiratory staff for 2 (#3 and #R1) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #R1, #R2, and #R3) residents reviewed; and 3.) Physician's Orders were followed for 4 ( #1, #2, #3, #R2 and #R3) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #R1, #R2, and #R3) residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #1, a dependent resident with an infected Stage 4 Sacral Wound, on 06/13/2023 at 2:30 p.m. when nursing staff failed to communicate a new Physician's Order for intravenous Vancomycin to the pharmacy. From 06/15/2023 through 06/19/2023, Resident #1 missed multiple doses of the intravenous Vancomycin which resulted in further wound infection. On 06/22/2023, S2NP transferred Resident #1 to the emergency room after noting the sacral wound had a foul odor and purulent drainage. Resident #1 returned to the facility on [DATE] with a new Physician's Order to continue intravenous Vancomycin for the Sacral Wound Infection. Nursing staff continued to miss doses of the intravenous Vancomycin as ordered. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #3 on 06/26/2023 when respiratory staff failed to administer scheduled breathing treatments twice a day as ordered. Resident #3 had a tracheostomy and was oxygen dependent. On 07/01/2023 and 07/19/2023 nursing staff failed to communicate new orders to respiratory staff. During this time, nursing staff also failed to administer oral, subcutaneous, and IV medications. On 07/15/2023 Resident #3 was found with a faint pulse and with decreased oxygen levels. Resident #3's respirations were labored and shallow. Resident #3 required tracheostomy suctioning, became apneic and required manual breathing. This led to a hospitalization on 07/15/2023 for respiratory distress. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #R1 on 07/21/2023, a ventilator dependent resident, when respiratory staff failed to administer scheduled breathing treatments every 8 hours as ordered. Resident #R1 did not receive scheduled breathing treatments after 4:00 p.m. on 07/21/2023 through 07/25/2023, which resulted in the resident experiencing respiratory distress. Resident #R1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Sepsis with Severe Septic Shock. Resident #R1 returned to the facility on [DATE] with a Physician's Order for intravenous Cefepime. On 08/02/2023 nursing staff failed to administer the 6:00 a.m. dose of Cefepime to Resident #R1. On 08/02/2023 at 1:00 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #R1 receiving intravenous Meropenem, which was not prescribed to Resident #R1. Resident #R1 was readmitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Sepsis with Septic Shock, Pneumonia and Hypoxia. S1ADM was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation on 08/04/2023 at 7:01 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/08/2023 at 2:20 p.m. after the provider presented an acceptable plan of removal. Through observation, interview and record review, the surveyors confirmed the following components of the plan of removal had been initiated and/or implemented prior to exit. Plan of Removal: The following actions were taken immediately upon notification on 08/04/2023 to correct noncompliant practices. 1. Medication Administration, Documentation and Translation of orders: a. In-Services were conducted with weekend staff to ensure all nurses were educated on Medication administration, documentation, translation, antibiotic administration, medication availability, pharmacy communication process and communication between Nursing and Respiratory Staff. 100% of nursing staff will be educated by 08/09/2023. b.100% of all residents' medical records were reviewed to ensure accuracy of physician orders. c. Medication pass observations were done on every nurse on every shift during the entire weekend by one of either the DON, Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse, ADONs and RN Supervisor to ensure competency and compliance. Starting 08/04/2023 and all nursing staff will be observed by 08/09/2023. d.100% of all medication carts were looked at and cleaned up by DON, Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse, ADONs and RN Supervisor to ensure competency and compliance. e. Pharmacy communication policy and guidelines were immediately put in place by DON, Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse, ADONs and RN Supervisor to ensure competency and compliance. f. All residents receiving antibiotics were identified and a surveillance spreadsheet was created for direct observation of nurses administering the medication. g. Education was provided to nursing staff in the case that antibiotics were unavailable. Nurses were educated to contact MD, DON and RR Nurses were educated on documenting the unavailability of antibiotic and what steps were taken. h. All residents receiving Respiratory orders were identified and compared to the Respiratory Medication Administration Record. i. Nurses and Respiratory therapists were educated on communicating new Respiratory orders. j. All shifts beginning on 08/04/2023 night shift through 08/07/2023 day shift were educated and observed on medication administration, documentation and translation; antibiotic administration, and communication between nursing and respiratory therapist on new and existing orders. 2. Identification of other residents having the potential to be affected was accomplished by: a. The facility has determined that all residents have the potential to be affected. 3. Actions taken/systems put into place to reduce the risk of future occurrence include: The following training began on 08/04/2023 and will be completed by 08/09/2023: a. Immediate complete competency checks on existing nursing staff related to medication administration (see new process attached), documentation, and transcription of orders. Competency checks began on 08/04/2023. All nursing staff to receive competency checks by 08/09/2023. b. New staff and contract staff will be educated on AHT, medication administration processes, documentation, transcription, medication refill process and pharmacy communication. All competencies will be completed before working independently with residents. c. Nurses responsible to send medication refills when indicated. Stickers to be pulled from medication blister packs when indicated and faxed to pharmacy. d. Nurse to initial, time and date fax sheet that was sent to pharmacy. Once faxed, sheet to be put in ADON boxes. Pharmacy delivery receipts to be placed in ADON boxes once medication arrives at facility. e. Power point education to be handed out to entire nursing staff explaining order entering, skin assessments, admission processes, and skilled documentation. A copy of all education was laminated and placed on all med carts. f. Communication between Nursing and Respiratory on any new and existing Respiratory orders by providing new admission or readmission order set to Respiratory Manager or designee. New orders to be copied and handed to Respiratory Manager or designee. Daily monitoring by Respiratory Manager or designee or new orders to be placed in Respiratory box. The following monitoring began on 08/04/2023 and will be completed by 09/22/2023: g. ADONs to review pharmacy delivery receipts daily and compare with faxed medication sheets to ensure all medications have been delivered. Oversight by DON or designee of pharmacy process weekly. h. ADONs or designee to communicate with pharmacy (Monday-Friday) to ensure receipt of faxes. Oversight by DON or designee of pharmacy process weekly. i. Weekly in-services targeted to reorient current nursing staff on Antibiotic availability and administration, AHT, Medication administration, documentation, and transcription to be completed by ADONs and DON. j. All new orders to be pulled and checked by ADON's or designee daily in the morning. k. Monitoring of medication administration, documentation, translation processes as well as physician order review and pharmacy communication as listed above by Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse weekly. 4. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur: This plan of correction will be monitored at the monthly Quality Assurance meeting. QA Board to deem effective systems in place by September 22, 2023 via DON report of findings, to assure consistent substantial compliance. This plan of correction will be monitored at the Quality Assurance meeting at least quarterly, optimal monthly at QA progress meetings to ensure consistent substantial compliance. This deficient practice continued at more than minimal harm for the remaining resident identified by the facility as receiving all medications as ordered. Findings: 1.) Review of the facility's Medication Reconciliation policy revealed the following, in part: 2. Resident identifiers will be verified on all medication labels and documents containing medication information to verify the correct person. 5. b. Verify medication labels match physician orders and consider rights of medication administration each time a medication is given. Review of the facility's Medication Reordering policy revealed the following, in part: 2. Acquisition of medications should be completed in a timely manner to ensure medications are administered in a timely manner. Resident #1 A review of the clinical records revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction, Quadriplegia, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage 4, and Cellulitis. A review of Resident #1's Physician Orders dated June 2023 revealed an order for Vancomycin 750mg vial administer Intravenous every twelve hours x 7 days with a start date of 06/13/2023. Further review revealed the physician ordered the last dose of Vancomycin to be given on 06/19/2023. A Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated June 2023 revealed Vancomycin 750 mg IV every 12 hours x7 days was not administered on 06/15/2023 at 9:00 p.m., and the 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. doses were not administered on 6/17/2023, 06/18/2023, or 06/19/2023. This was indicated on the MAR by either an empty box or circled initials. A review of Resident #1's Nurses' Notes dated June 2023 revealed the following: 06/17/2023 at 8:30 a.m., No Vancomycin available. Called and placed order to pharmacy. Pharmacist will call back regarding Vancomycin. No call back, supervisor aware. 06/19/2023 called and faxed order to pharmacy for IV Vancomycin. 06/20/2023 at 10:00 p.m. Vancomycin not available 06/21/2023 at 9:00 a.m. Vancomycin not available. NP Notified A review of Resident #1's Physician's Progress Notes dated June 2023 revealed the following: 06/13/2023, Ordered Vancomycin 750mg IV every 12 hours x 7 days. 06/23/2023, Wound noted to be deteriorating. IV Vancomycin noted with multiple missed dosing for unknown reason. Patient was referred to long term acute care hospital yesterday for wound needing IV antibiotic treatment, aggressive wound debridement, and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A review of Resident #1's clinical lab results revealed the following Vancomycin Trough levels: 06/15/2023- 5.9-low 06/19/2023- <3.5-abnorml 06/21/2023- <3.5-abnormal (Therapeutic values: Trough: 10-20 ug/ml) It is noted the above values are sub therapeutic. A review of Resident #1's Pharmacy Records dated June 2023 revealed the following: 06/19/2023 at 3:21 p.m., Fax received for initial order as follows: (start date 06/13/2023) Vancomycin 750 mg IV every 12 hours x 7 days. Vancomycin trough 30 minutes prior to 4th dose; hold Vancomycin until trough results. A review of the facility's Emergency Transfer Log dated June 2023 revealed Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. A review of Resident #1's Hospital Records from 06/22/2023 revealed Resident #1 arrived at the Emergency Department with a chief complaint of a large sacral wound. Labs were drawn and revealed the following: RBC: 3.24 (low), Hemoglobin: 6.9 (low), Hematocrit 23.8 (low) and Albumin 2.2 (low). Resident #1's labs were significant for severe anemia likely secondary from the bleeding sacral wound. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital for abnormal labs and received 1 unit of packed red blood cells. Resident #1 received iron while impatient due to iron deficiency anemia. On 06/26/2023, Resident #1 had a wound debridement for the Sacral Decubitus Ulcer, Stage IV. A review of Resident #1's Nurse's Note revealed the resident returned to the facility on [DATE] at 2:00 p.m. A review of Resident #1's re-admission Physician Orders dated 07/07/2023 revealed the following: Vancomycin 1.25gm/250ml - 0.9% Normal Saline to infuse intravenously every 12 hours for Stage 4 Sacral Wound for 21 days Start Date: 07/07/2023 End Date: 07/29/2023 Cefepime HCL 2 gram vial to infuse intravenously every 12 hours for Cellulitis for 21 days Start Date: 07/07/2023 End Date: 07/29/2023. A Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated July 2023 revealed neither dose of Vancomycin 1.25gm/250ml IV was administered on 07/22/2023, 07/23/2023 and 07/25/2023. Further review revealed Resident #1 did not receive the 9:00 a.m. dose of Vancomycin on 07/24/2023 and 07/26/2023. This was indicated on the MAR by either an empty box or the box indicated not given. Further review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated July 2023 revealed Cefepime HCL 2 Grams IV was not administered at 9:00 p.m. on 07/22/2023, 07/23/2023, 07/25/2023 or 07/28/2023. This was indicated on the MAR by either an empty box or the box indicated not given. A review of Resident #1's Nurses' Notes dated July 2023 revealed the following: 07/23/2023 at 12:35 a.m., IV antibiotics not administered, waiting on pharmacy to bring refill, will resume when arrive. 07/24/2023 at 11:20 a.m., Morning IV antibiotics not administered. Awaiting delivery. ADON notified. 07/24/2023 at 11:36 a.m., At start of shift pharmacy called inquiring about IV Vancomycin. Requesting trough levels for 07/21/2023. New orders given to continue current dose and Vancomycin trough on 07/24/2023 and 07/28/2023. Lab results and order faxed to pharmacy. A review of Resident #1's Physician's Progress Notes dated July 2023 revealed the following: 07/27/2023, Discussed with nurse to give Vancomycin as ordered. Apparently Resident #1 has not been given Vancomycin as ordered. Discussed with nurse to follow orders and Vancomycin needs to be given. A review of Resident #1's clinical lab results dated July 2023 revealed the following Vancomycin Trough levels: 07/11/2023- 5.0 ug/mL 07/14/2023- <3.5 ug/mL 07/18/2023- <3.5 ug/mL 07/21/2023- <3.5 ug/mL 07/28/2023- 6.5 ug/mL Target Trough: 10-20 ug/ml It is noted all of the above trough levels were sub therapeutic. A review of Resident #1's Pharmacy Records dated July 2023 revealed the following: 07/07/2023 at 5:18 p.m., Fax received for re-admit physician orders as follows: (start date 07/07/2023 stop date: 07/29/2023) Vancomycin 1.25 gm/250 ml 0.9% NS infuse IV every 12 hours for Stage 4 Sacral Wound for 21 days. 07/07/2023 at 6:22 p.m., 6 doses of Vancomycin sent 07/10/2023 at 2:16 p.m., Nurse said she gave Vancomycin dose at 10:00 a.m. The facility has 5 doses left so that was the only dose given. I faxed the Vancomycin dosing form twice today but she doesn't see the form. Nurse stated labs came back at 3.5 ug/mL. I asked several times to speak with the NP and was told he was busy. Nurse stated they had enough Vancomycin until labs are ordered to be drawn on 07/11/2023. 07/10/2023, 5 remaining doses of Vancomycin in facility at 2:00 p.m. 07/11/2023 at 5:08 p.m., Called and no one answered. Need Vancomycin count. 07/12/2023, 4 remaining doses of Vancomycin in facility at 3:15 p.m., obviously not being given correctly 07/13/2023, 1 dose of Vancomycin sent, 2 doses remaining in facility at 2:44 p.m. 07/14/2023 at 11:43 a.m., Spoke with nurse. Told her we have not been able to get consistent labs or answers since we got this patient and doses are not being given correctly. Labs were not draw again today. I told her we will send enough to get through Monday but if labs aren't drawn on Monday then they will be cutting this patient off unless the doctor and DON are involved. 07/14/2023, 6 doses of Vancomycin sent, 1 dose remaining at 11:35 a.m. 07/17/2023- 0 doses of Vancomycin remains in facility at 1:15 p.m. 07/18/2023 at 12:53 p.m. spoke with S6ADON again about not being able to obtain any information on this patient. S6ADON stated trough was done that morning so I told her to call back with results. 07/18/2023 at 2:23 p.m., Per S6ADON lab results were 3.7 ug/mL, I'm willing to bet they have not been giving the Vancomycin. I have no idea where the Vancomycin is going. I will send 1 dose for tonight and 2 for tomorrow. I will contact the doctor because this patient is not being treated appropriately. 07/18/2023 at 2:37 p.m., 3 doses of Vancomycin, 0 remaining. 07/19/2023 at 7:41 a.m., Spoke with S3DON. I told her we had problems getting the correct information needed. I read her my notes to help her understand the problems we had been having and the lack of care/concerns. I told her we will no longer be dosing for this facility, we will require Dr. to dose form faxed to us. Pharmacy gave specific instructions on what was needed. 07/20/2023 at 11:06 a.m., Spoke with nurse who informed Pharmacy Resident #1 line came out so they were waiting for replacement. They have 1 Vancomycin on hand. Instructed her to follow up with labs. Will send out 1 dose of Vancomycin. Dr. to dose sheet faxed. 07/20/2023, 1 dose of Vancomycin sent 07/21/2023 at 7:27 a.m., Dr. to dose form faxed. 07/21/2023 at 11:15 a.m., Called phone rang off hook. 07/21/2023 at 4:10 pm., No labs yet 07/24/2023 at 8:36 a.m., Spoke with nurse who was looking for Vancomycin. I told her we never received labs or MD orders. I told her we need this. We cannot keep sending Vancomycin without any information. Faxed new dose form with all needed to comment section at 8:39 a.m. 07/24/2023 at 9:28 a.m., Spoke with S2NP and he wanted to find out what was needed and what was going on. I gave him all the information needed. 07/24/2023, 5 doses of Vancomycin sent 07/26/2023 at 2:38 p.m., Called, rang, no answer. 07/26/2023, 6 doses of Vancomycin sent, 1 dose remaining at 3:00 p.m., should have 2 for today On 08/01/2023 at 9:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10LPN. She stated when a medication was administered, it was documented on the MAR. She stated if the MAR was left blank then it meant the medication was not administered. On 08/01/2023 at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She stated the nurses were expected to request a medication refill prior to the medication running out. She reviewed Resident #1's MARS of June and July 2023 and confirmed Vancomycin and Cefepime was not administered as ordered and should have been. On 08/01/2023 at 12:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2NP. He confirmed he was familiar with Resident #1. He stated Vancomycin was ordered on 06/13/2023 for an infected pressure ulcer. He reported reviewing the Vancomycin trough labs and realized the resident was not receiving the medication because the labs were sub therapeutic and not rising. He stated he notified administration about Resident #1 not receiving the Vancomycin. S2NP stated he remembered in June being contacted by a nurse to clarify to give the last dose of Vancomycin since so many doses had been missed. At that time he gave an order to give the last dose. He stated Resident #1's wound abscessed and he sent Resident #1 to the hospital for higher level of wound treatment. He stated he spoke to the nurses and educated them on the importance of receiving the medication and how they needed to follow the orders to give Vancomycin. He reported the resident retuned to the facility on [DATE] with orders for Vancomycin and Cefepime. He stated Resident #1 had multiple missed doses of Vancomycin in July 2023. He stated the pharmacy wanted the nurses to communicate trough levels via fax prior to the medication being sent. S2NP stated he educated the nursing staff and the administration on the pharmacy's new protocol. He stated the nursing staff did not communicate Resident #1 missed doses of either Vancomycin or Cefepime. On 08/01/2023 at 1:21 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with S8RN. He confirmed working the weekend of 06/18/2023-06/19/2023. He stated a nurse reported Resident #1's Vancomycin was not available for administration. He said he directed the nurse to contact the pharmacy and the provider if she could not reach the pharmacy. He stated he did not know if the nurse contacted the pharmacy or if the medication was received and given. He confirmed he did not follow up with the nurse after she reported the medication as unavailable. On 08/01/2023 at 4:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S15LPN. She confirmed working on 07/22/2023 and 07/23/2023. She stated she did not administer Resident #1's Vancomycin on either day because the medication was not available. She stated she was not trained on the procedure if a resident was out of medication. On 08/02/2023 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She stated knew Resident #1 did not receive ordered Vancomycin in June 2023. She stated she in-serviced the floor nurses in June on Antibiotic Administration. She stated the nurses did not know the process for obtaining medications from the pharmacy when a resident was out. She stated if the medication was not available the nurses would not administer it and move on. She stated the nurses would not communicate missing medications with herself or the NP. She stated the in service included education on communicating with the ADON, DON, NP and the process to follow if a medication was not available. She stated on 07/11/2023, she received a call from the pharmacy requesting a trough level for Vancomycin and an order from the provider on the plan of care. She stated she educated and instructed the ADON's to oversee the Vancomycin trough levels and the NP order form. She stated the ADON's were responsible to communicate with the pharmacy and the NP. On 08/02/2023 at 3:30 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with contracted pharmacist. She stated the first time the pharmacy received an order for Resident #1 to start Vancomycin was on 06/19/2023. She confirmed the pharmacy did not receive an order for Resident #1 on 06/13/2023 and therefore did not send medication prior to 06/19/2023. She stated on 06/19/2023, the pharmacy sent 5 bags of Vancomycin to the facility. She stated on 06/21/2023, the facility requested 2 more bags of Vancomycin because they were out. The pharmacist said she sent 2 bags at that time, but the facility should not have been out of the medication. She stated the nurses reported they were giving the medication as ordered, but the Vancomycin trough levels suggested Resident #1 was not receiving the medication appropriately. She stated she called and communicated the suspected missing doses with S3DON in June 2023. She reported the facility had poor communication with pharmacy and would not provide needed information. She reported in July 2023, the pharmacy had the same issues with the facility and missing doses of medication so she spoke with 3DON again. On 08/03/2023 at 3:11 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5ADON. He stated it was the nurse's responsibility to communicate new medication orders with the pharmacy. If a medication was unavailable, the nurse should communicate with the pharmacy, NP/MD, ADON and DON. He stated the nurses did not report Resident #1 was out of Vancomycin in June or July 2023. He stated the medications should have been administered as ordered. On 08/04/2023 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S16LPN. She stated Resident #1 was not getting Vancomycin trough labs drawn so the Pharmacy would not send the Vancomycin in June 2023. She confirmed working on the morning of 06/18/2023. She stated she did not give Resident #1's Vancomycin as ordered because it was not available. She stated she notified S2NP and told him she did not have the medication. She stated she did not notify the Pharmacy. On 08/04/2023 at 10:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6ADON. S6ADON confirmed knowing Resident #1 had missed doses of Vancomycin in June 20203. She explained in July 2023, S3DON instructed her to oversee the trough levels and communication with the lab and pharmacy. She stated after receiving trough results from the lab, she would then fax the labs to the pharmacy. She confirmed it was unacceptable that Resident #1 missed intravenous Vancomycin and Cefepime. On 08/02/2023 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. S3DON said if a resident's MAR was not initialed by the nurse, it meant the medication was not given. She also said if the MAR had circled initials, it also meant the medication not given. She reviewed Resident #1's clinical record and confirmed Resident #1 had an order for Vancomycin to start on 06/13/2023. She stated she did not know the resident missed doses of Vancomycin until 06/19/2023. She said the nurses did not know the process to follow if a resident was out of medications, so they did not give it. Resident #2 A review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Quadriplegia, UTI, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A review of Resident #2's Physician's Orders dated July 2023 revealed an order dated 07/12/2023 for Meropenem 1 gram IV every 8 hours for 7 days. Diagnosis: UTI. Further review revealed an order for Humalog sliding scale: 0-120: 0 units; 121-150: 2 units; 151-200: 4 units; 201-250: 6 units; 251-300: 9 units; 301-350: 12 units; 351-400: 15 units and call MD. A review of Resident #2's MAR dated July 2023 revealed Meropenem 1 gram IV every 8 hours was documented as not given on 07/14/2023 at 6:00 a.m. or 10:00 p.m., 07/15/2023 at 6:00 a.m. or 10:00 p.m., 07/16/2023 at 6:00 a.m., and 07/18/2023 at 10:00 p.m Further review of Resident #2's July 2023 MAR revealed: 07/14/2023 at 4:30 p.m., Accucheck result of 165 and no documentation of insulin administered. 07/19/2023 at 7:30 a.m., Accucheck result of 135 and no documentation of insulin administered. 07/27/2023 at 4:30 p.m., Accucheck result of 218 and documentation of incorrect insulin dose of 4 units administered. A review of Resident #2's nurses' notes revealed no documentation as to why the resident did not receive Meropenem, the incorrect insulin administrations or if the physician was notified. On 08/02/2023 at 11:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. S3DON reviewed Resident #2's July 2023 MAR. She confirmed there were blank boxes on the MAR that correlated with the above dates. She verified the blank boxes on the MAR meant the medication was not given. On 08/02/2023 at 12:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2NP. He verified he was not notified that Resident #2 missed doses of intravenous Meropenem in July 2023. He also confirmed he was not aware the resident received incorrect insulin coverage in July 2023. On 08/02/2023 at 1:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12LPN. S12LPN reviewed Resident #2's July 2023 MAR. She verified the boxes for administration times on 07/14/2023, 07/15/2023, 7/16/2023 and 07/18/2023were blank. She stated if the boxes on the MAR were blank it meant the medication was not administered. Resident #3 A review of the clinical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Anoxic Brain Damage, Tracheostomy, Osteomyelitis, Congestive Heart Failure, Pressure Ulcer to Left Buttock, Stage 4, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Area, Stage 4, and Pressure Ulcer to Right Buttock, Stage 4, Gastrostomy Status, and Chronic Respiratory Failure A review of Resident #3's Physicians Orders for June 2023 revealed the following: 06/26/2023, Meropenem 1gm IV every 8 hours for 26 days; 06/26/2023, Albuterol 0.633 mg/3mL give 3 mL via neb every six hours prn wheezing; 06/26/2023, Budesonide 0.5 mg/2mL give 2 mL via neb BID x14 days; 06/26/2023, Duo-neb 0.5-3mg/3mL give 3 mL via neb every six hours prn wheezing; 06/26/2023, Lasix 40 mg administer one tablet per peg twice a day; and 06/26/2023, Levetiracetam 500 mg administer one tablet per peg twice a day. A review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2023 revealed Meropenem 1gm IV every 8 hours was not administered on 06/28/2023 at 2:00 p.m.; Lasix 40 mg 1 tablet per peg twice a day was not administered on 06/28/2023 at 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. and on 06/29/2023 at 6:00 a.m. and Keppra 500mg 1 tablet per peg tube twice a day was not administered on 06/28/2023 at 6:00 a.m. A review of the respiratory therapy documentation for Resident #3 revealed Budesonide 0.5 mg/2mL give 2 mL via nebulizer BID was not administered on 06/26/2023, 06/27/2023, or 06/28/2023. A review of the Transfer Log revealed Resident #3 was transferred to the emergency room on [DATE] due to a critical H&H. A review of Resident #3's Physicians Orders for July 2023 revealed the following: 07/01/2023, Albuterol-Ipratropium 2.5mg-2.5/3mL give 3mL by neb every six hours; 07/01/2023 and 07/19/2023, Levetiracetam 500mg/5mL administer 5mL per peg twice daily; 07/19/2023, Lasix 40 mg administer one tablet per peg daily; 07/19/2023, Enoxaparin 40 mg administer subcutaneous daily; and 07/19/2023, Duo-neb 2.5-0.5 mg/3 mL give 3mL via neb every six hours A review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2023 revealed the following: Lasix 40 mg 1 tablet per peg tube twice a day was not administered on 07/01/2023 at 6:00 p.m. or 07/28/2023 at 5:00 a.m.; Levetiracetam 500mg/5mL solution, 5 mL solution per peg tube twice a day was not administered on 07/03/2023 and 07/28/2023 at 6:00 a.m., 07/04/2023, 07/20/2023 and 07/21/2023 at 6:00 p.m. and Enoxaparin 40 mg/0.4mL (0.4 mL=40 mg) into the skin subcutaneous daily was not administered on 07/28/2023 at 6:00 a.m. A review of Resident #3's Nurse's notes dated 07/15/2023 revealed the respiratory therapist alerted the nurse Resident # 3 had oxygen saturations levels of 82%. Resident #3's respirations were very shallow and labored, and pulses were faint. The respiratory therapist began mask bag ventilation. A review of Respiratory flowsheet dated 07/15/2023 revealed at 12:20 p.m. Resident #3 respiratory rate was 23 and had an oxygen saturation level of 90%. The respiratory therapist had suctioned bloody plugs, changed the resident's inner trach cannula, and performed trach care. Resident #3's oxygen saturation decreased to 80% and had become apneic. Artificial manual breathing unit with oxygen was initiated and the resident was suctioned three times. Resident #3 had become apneic again and her oxygen saturation levels decreased to 70%. Resident#3 was bagged until Emergency Medical Services arrived. Resident had no respiratory effort and weak pulse. A review of the respiratory therapy documentation for Resident #3 revealed Albuterol-Ipratropium 2.5mg-2.5/3mL was not administ
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility failed to ensure licensed nurses and other nursing personnel had the knowledge, competencies, and skill sets to pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility failed to ensure licensed nurses and other nursing personnel had the knowledge, competencies, and skill sets to provide care and respond to each resident's individualized needs by failing to ensure: 1.) Nurses administered medications as ordered for 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #R1, #R2, and #R3) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #R1, #R2, and #R3) residents reviewed; 2.) Changes in Respiratory orders were communicated with Respiratory staff for 2 (#3 and #R1) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #R1, #R2, and #R3) residents reviewed; and 3.) Physician's Orders were followed for 4 ( #1, #2, #3, #R2 and #R3) of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #R1, #R2, and #R3) residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #1, a dependent resident with an infected Stage 4 Sacral Wound, on 06/13/2023 at 2:30 p.m. when nursing staff failed to communicate a new Physician's Order for intravenous Vancomycin to the pharmacy. From 06/15/2023 through 06/19/2023, Resident #1 missed multiple doses of the intravenous Vancomycin which resulted in further wound infection. On 06/22/2023, S2NP transferred Resident #1 to the emergency room after noting the sacral wound had a foul odor and purulent drainage. Resident #1 returned to the facility on [DATE] with a new Physician's Order to continue intravenous Vancomycin for the Sacral Wound Infection. Nursing staff continued to miss doses of the intravenous Vancomycin as ordered. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #3 on 06/26/2023 when respiratory staff failed to administer scheduled breathing treatments twice a day as ordered. Resident #3 had a tracheostomy and was oxygen dependent. On 07/01/2023 and 07/19/2023 nursing staff failed to communicate new orders to respiratory staff. During this time, nursing staff also failed to administer oral, subcutaneous, and IV medications. On 07/15/2023 Resident #3 was found with a faint pulse and with decreased oxygen levels. Resident #3's respirations were labored and shallow. Resident #3 required tracheostomy suctioning, became apneic and required manual breathing. This led to a hospitalization on 07/15/2023 for respiratory distress. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #R1 on 07/21/2023, a ventilator dependent resident, when respiratory staff failed to administer scheduled breathing treatments every 8 hours as ordered. Resident #R1 did not receive scheduled breathing treatments after 4:00 p.m. on 07/21/2023 through 07/25/2023, which resulted in the resident experiencing respiratory distress. Resident #R1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Sepsis with Severe Septic Shock. Resident #R1 returned to the facility on [DATE] with a Physician's Order for intravenous Cefepime. On 08/02/2023 nursing staff failed to administer the 6:00 a.m. dose of Cefepime to Resident #R1. On 08/02/2023 at 1:00 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #R1 receiving intravenous Meropenem, which was not prescribed to Resident #R1. Resident #R1 was readmitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Sepsis with Septic Shock, Pneumonia and Hypoxia. S1ADM was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation on 08/04/2023 at 7:01 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/08/2023 at 2:20 p.m. when the provider presented an acceptable plan of removal. Through observation, interview and record review, the surveyors confirmed the following components of the plan of removal had been initiated and/or implemented prior to exit. Plan of Removal: The following actions were taken immediately upon notification on 08/04/2023 to correct noncompliant practices. a. Medication Administration, Documentation and Translation of orders: b. In-services were conducted with weekend staff to ensure all nurses were educated on medication administration, documentation, translation, antibiotic administration, medication availability, pharmacy communication process and communication between Nursing and Respiratory Staff. c. 100% of all residents' medical records were reviewed to ensure accuracy of physician orders. d. Medication pass observations were done on every nurse on every shift during the entire weekend by one of either the DON, Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse, ADONs and RN Supervisor to ensure competency and compliance. e. 100% of all medication carts were looked at and cleaned up by DON, Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse, ADONs and RN Supervisor to ensure competency and compliance. f. Pharmacy communication policy and guidelines were immediately put in place by DON, Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse, ADONs and RN Supervisor to ensure competency and compliance. g. All residents' receiving antibiotics were identified and a surveillance spreadsheet was created for direct observation of nurses administering the medication. h. Education was provided to nursing staff in the case that antibiotics were unavailable. Nurses were educated to contact MD, DON and RP. Nurses were educated on documenting the unavailability of antibiotic and what steps were taken. i. All residents receiving Respiratory orders were identified and compared to the Respiratory Medication Administration Record. j. Nurses and Respiratory therapists were educated on communicating new Respiratory orders. k. All shifts beginning on 08/04/2023 night shift through 08/07/2023 day shift were educated and observed on medication administration, documentation and translation; antibiotic administration, and communication between nursing and respiratory therapist on new and existing orders. 2.) Identification of other residents having the potential to be affected was accomplished by: a. The facility has determined that all residents have the potential to be affected. 3.)Actions taken/systems put into place to reduce the risk of future occurrence include: The following training began on 08/04/2023 and will be completed by 08/09/2023: a. Immediate complete competency checks on existing nursing staff related to medication administration (see new process attached), documentation, and transcription of orders. b. New staff and contract staff will be educated on AHT, medication administration processes, documentation, transcription, medication refill process and pharmacy communication. All competencies will be completed before working independently with residents. c. Communication between Nursing and Respiratory on any new and existing Respiratory orders by providing new admission or readmission order set to Respiratory Manager or designee. New orders to be copied and handed to Respiratory Manager or designee. Daily monitoring by Respiratory Manager or designee or new orders to be placed in Respiratory box. d. Nurses responsible to send medication refills when indicated. Stickers to be pulled from medication blister packs when indicated and faxed to pharmacy e. Nurse to initial, time and date fax sheet that was sent to pharmacy. Once faxed, sheet to be put in ADON boxes. Pharmacy delivery receipts to be placed in ADON boxes once medication arrives at the facility. f. Power point education to be handed out to entire nursing staff explaining order entering, skin assessments, admission processes, and skilled documentation. A copy of all education will be laminated and placed on all med carts. The The following monitoring began on 08/04/2023 and will be completed by 09/22/2023: a. All nurses will complete an initial medication pass observation, observed by DON or designee. Random medication passes will be performed throughout the quarter. (To continue to be monitored until quarterly QA board deems monitoring has been effective by September 22, 2023). b. For ongoing compliance, the DON or designee will conduct weekly medication cart, EMR and medication storage audits starting weekly x 4, then monthly ongoing for Quality Control and to ensure availability of medications for administration. c. The DON and or designees will also conduct medication administration observations at random, 1 on each shift, weekly then ongoing CQI. d. ADONs to review pharmacy delivery receipts daily and compare with faxed medication sheets to ensure all medications have been delivered. (To continue to be monitored until quarterly QA board deems monitoring has been effective by September 22, 2023. e. ADONs or designee to communicate with pharmacy (Monday-Friday) to ensure receipt of faxes. (To continue to be monitored until quarterly QA board deems monitoring has been effective by September 22, 2023). Oversight by DON or designee of pharmacy process weekly. f. Weekly in-services targeted to reorient current nursing staff on Antibiotic availability and administration, AHT, Medication administration, documentation and transcription to be completed by ADONs and DON. (To continue to be monitored until quarterly QA board deems monitoring has been effective by September 22, 2023. g. All new orders to be pulled and checked by ADON's or designee daily (Monday through Friday) in the morning. Oversight by DON or designee weekly. h. Communication between Nursing and Respiratory on any new and existing Respiratory orders by providing new admission or readmission order set to Respiratory Manager or designee. New orders to be copied and handed to Respiratory Manager or designee. Daily monitoring by Respiratory Manager or designee or new orders to be placed in Respiratory box. i. The Regional Nurse or designee will conduct quarterly checks to determine compliance with the completion of the audits by the DON or designee and the identify trends and areas of continued non-compliance. 4.) 4. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur: This This plan of correction will be monitored at the monthly Quality Assurance meeting. QA Board to deem effective systems in place by September 22, 2023 via DON report of findings, to assure consistent substantial compliance. This plan of correction will be monitored at the Quality Assurance meeting at least quarterly, optimal monthly at QA progress to ensure consistent substantial compliance. This deficient practice continued at more than minimal harm for the remaining resident identified by the facility as receiving all medications as ordered. Findings: Review of the facility's Medication Reconciliation policy revealed the following, in part: 2. Resident identifiers will be verified on all medication labels and documents containing medication information to verify the correct person. 5. b. Verify medication labels match physician orders and consider rights of medication administration each time a medication is given. Review of the facility's Medication Reordering policy revealed the following, in part: 2. Acquisition of medications should be completed in a timely manner to ensure medications are administered in a timely manner. Resident #1 A review of the clinical records revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction, Quadriplegia, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage 4, and Cellulitis. A review of Resident #1's Physician Orders dated June 2023 revealed an order for Vancomycin 750mg vial administer Intravenous every twelve hours x 7 days with a start date of 06/13/2023. Further review revealed the physician ordered the last dose of Vancomycin to be given on 06/19/2023. A Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated June 2023 revealed Vancomycin 750 mg IV every 12 hours x7 days was not administered on 06/15/2023 at 9:00 p.m., and the 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. doses were not administered on 6/17/2023, 06/18/2023, or 06/19/2023. This was indicated on the MAR by either an empty box or circled initials. A review of Resident #1's Nurses' Notes dated June 2023 revealed the following: 06/17/2023 at 8:30 a.m., No Vancomycin available. Called and placed order to pharmacy. Pharmacist will call back regarding Vancomycin. No call back, supervisor aware. 06/19/2023 called and faxed order to pharmacy for IV Vancomycin. 06/20/2023 at 10:00 p.m. Vancomycin not available 06/21/2023 at 9:00 a.m. Vancomycin not available. NP Notified A review of Resident #1's Physician's Progress Notes dated June 2023 revealed the following: 06/13/2023, Ordered Vancomycin 750mg IV every 12 hours x 7 days. 06/23/2023, Wound noted to be deteriorating. IV Vancomycin noted with multiple missed dosing for unknown reason. Patient was referred to long term acute care hospital yesterday for wound needing IV antibiotic treatment, aggressive wound debridement, and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A review of Resident #1's clinical lab results revealed the following Vancomycin Trough levels: 06/15/2023- 5.9-low 06/19/2023- <3.5-abnorml 06/21/2023- <3.5-abnormal (Therapeutic values: Trough: 10-20 ug/ml) It is noted the above values are sub therapeutic. A review of Resident #1's Pharmacy Records dated June 2023 revealed the following: 06/19/2023 at 3:21 p.m., Fax received for initial order as follows: (start date 06/13/2023) Vancomycin 750 mg IV every 12 hours x 7 days. Vancomycin trough 30 minutes prior to 4th dose; hold Vancomycin until trough results. A review of the facility's Emergency Transfer Log dated June 2023 revealed Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. A review of Resident #1's Hospital Records from 06/22/2023 revealed Resident #1 arrived at the Emergency Department with a chief complaint of a large sacral wound. Labs were drawn and revealed the following: RBC: 3.24 (low), Hemoglobin: 6.9 (low), Hematocrit 23.8 (low) and Albumin 2.2 (low). Resident #1's labs were significant for severe anemia likely secondary from the bleeding sacral wound. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital for abnormal labs and received 1 unit of packed red blood cells. Resident #1 received iron while impatient due to iron deficiency anemia. On 06/26/2023, Resident #1 had a wound debridement for the Sacral Decubitus Ulcer, Stage IV. A review of Resident #1's Nurse's Note revealed the resident returned to the facility on [DATE] at 2:00 p.m. A review of Resident #1's re-admission Physician Orders dated 07/07/2023 revealed the following: Vancomycin 1.25gm/250ml - 0.9% Normal Saline to infuse intravenously every 12 hours for Stage 4 Sacral Wound for 21 days Start Date: 07/07/2023 End Date: 07/29/2023 Cefepime HCL 2 gram vial to infuse intravenously every 12 hours for Cellulitis for 21 days Start Date: 07/07/2023 End Date: 07/29/2023. A Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated July 2023 revealed neither dose of Vancomycin 1.25gm/250ml IV was administered on 07/22/2023, 07/23/2023 and 07/25/2023. Further review revealed Resident #1 did not receive the 9:00 a.m. dose of Vancomycin on 07/24/2023 and 07/26/2023. This was indicated on the MAR by either an empty box or the box indicated not given. Further review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated July 2023 revealed Cefepime HCL 2 Grams IV was not administered at 9:00 p.m. on 07/22/2023, 07/23/2023, 07/25/2023 or 07/28/2023. This was indicated on the MAR by either an empty box or the box indicated not given. A review of Resident #1's Nurses' Notes dated July 2023 revealed the following: 07/23/2023 at 12:35 a.m., IV antibiotics not administered, waiting on pharmacy to bring refill, will resume when arrive. 07/24/2023 at 11:20 a.m., Morning IV antibiotics not administered. Awaiting delivery. ADON notified. 07/24/2023 at 11:36 a.m., At start of shift pharmacy called inquiring about IV Vancomycin. Requesting trough levels for 07/21/2023. New orders given to continue current dose and Vancomycin trough on 07/24/2023 and 07/28/2023. Lab results and order faxed to pharmacy. A review of Resident #1's Physician's Progress Notes dated July 2023 revealed the following: 07/27/2023, Discussed with nurse to give Vancomycin as ordered. Apparently Resident #1 has not been given Vancomycin as ordered. Discussed with nurse to follow orders and Vancomycin needs to be given. A review of Resident #1's clinical lab results dated July 2023 revealed the following Vancomycin Trough levels: 07/11/2023- 5.0 ug/mL 07/14/2023- <3.5 ug/mL 07/18/2023- <3.5 ug/mL 07/21/2023- <3.5 ug/mL 07/28/2023- 6.5 ug/mL Target Trough: 10-20 ug/ml It is noted all of the above trough levels were sub therapeutic. A review of Resident #1's Pharmacy Records dated July 2023 revealed the following: 07/07/2023 at 5:18 p.m., Fax received for re-admit physician orders as follows: (start date 07/07/2023 stop date: 07/29/2023) Vancomycin 1.25 gm/250 ml 0.9% NS infuse IV every 12 hours for Stage 4 Sacral Wound for 21 days. 07/07/2023 at 6:22 p.m., 6 doses of Vancomycin sent 07/10/2023 at 2:16 p.m., Nurse said she gave Vancomycin dose at 10:00 a.m. The facility has 5 doses left so that was the only dose given. I faxed the Vancomycin dosing form twice today but she doesn't see the form. Nurse stated labs came back at 3.5 ug/mL. I asked several times to speak with the NP and was told he was busy. Nurse stated they had enough Vancomycin until labs are ordered to be drawn on 07/11/2023. 07/10/2023, 5 remaining doses of Vancomycin in facility at 2:00 p.m. 07/11/2023 at 5:08 p.m., Called and no one answered. Need Vancomycin count. 07/12/2023, 4 remaining doses of Vancomycin in facility at 3:15 p.m., obviously not being given correctly 07/13/2023, 1 dose of Vancomycin sent, 2 doses remaining in facility at 2:44 p.m. 07/14/2023 at 11:43 a.m., Spoke with nurse. Told her we have not been able to get consistent labs or answers since we got this patient and doses are not being given correctly. Labs were not draw again today. I told her we will send enough to get through Monday but if labs aren't drawn on Monday then they will be cutting this patient off unless the doctor and DON are involved. 07/14/2023, 6 doses of Vancomycin sent, 1 dose remaining at 11:35 a.m. 07/17/2023- 0 doses of Vancomycin remains in facility at 1:15 p.m. 07/18/2023 at 12:53 p.m. spoke with S6ADON again about not being able to obtain any information on this patient. S6ADON stated trough was done that morning so I told her to call back with results. 07/18/2023 at 2:23 p.m., Per S6ADON lab results were 3.7 ug/mL, I'm willing to bet they have not been giving the Vancomycin. I have no idea where the Vancomycin is going. I will send 1 dose for tonight and 2 for tomorrow. I will contact the doctor because this patient is not being treated appropriately. 07/18/2023 at 2:37 p.m., 3 doses of Vancomycin, 0 remaining. 07/19/2023 at 7:41 a.m., Spoke with S3DON. I told her we had problems getting the correct information needed. I read her my notes to help her understand the problems we had been having and the lack of care/concerns. I told her we will no longer be dosing for this facility, we will require Dr. to dose form faxed to us. Pharmacy gave specific instructions on what was needed. 07/20/2023 at 11:06 a.m., Spoke with nurse who informed Pharmacy Resident #1 line came out so they were waiting for replacement. They have 1 Vancomycin on hand. Instructed her to follow up with labs. Will send out 1 dose of Vancomycin. Dr. to dose sheet faxed. 07/20/2023, 1 dose of Vancomycin sent 07/21/2023 at 7:27 a.m., Dr. to dose form faxed. 07/21/2023 at 11:15 a.m., Called phone rang off hook. 07/21/2023 at 4:10 pm., No labs yet 07/24/2023 at 8:36 a.m., Spoke with nurse who was looking for Vancomycin. I told her we never received labs or MD orders. I told her we need this. We cannot keep sending Vancomycin without any information. Faxed new dose form with all needed to comment section at 8:39 a.m. 07/24/2023 at 9:28 a.m., Spoke with S2NP and he wanted to find out what was needed and what was going on. I gave him all the information needed. 07/24/2023, 5 doses of Vancomycin sent 07/26/2023 at 2:38 p.m., Called, rang, no answer. 07/26/2023, 6 doses of Vancomycin sent, 1 dose remaining at 3:00 p.m., should have 2 for today On 08/01/2023 at 9:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S10LPN. She stated when a medication was administered, it was documented on the MAR. She stated if the MAR was left blank then it meant the medication was not administered. On 08/01/2023 at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She stated the nurses were expected to request a medication refill prior to the medication running out. She reviewed Resident #1's MARS of June and July 2023 and confirmed Vancomycin and Cefepime was not administered as ordered and should have been. On 08/01/2023 at 12:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2NP. He confirmed he was familiar with Resident #1. He stated Vancomycin was ordered on 06/13/2023 for an infected pressure ulcer. He reported reviewing the Vancomycin trough labs and realized the resident was not receiving the medication because the labs were sub therapeutic and not rising. He stated he notified administration about Resident #1 not receiving the Vancomycin. S2NP stated he remembered in June being contacted by a nurse to clarify to give the last dose of Vancomycin since so many doses had been missed. At that time he gave an order to give the last dose. He stated Resident #1's wound abscessed and he sent Resident #1 to the hospital for higher level of wound treatment. He stated he spoke to the nurses and educated them on the importance of receiving the medication and how they needed to follow the orders to give Vancomycin. He reported the resident retuned to the facility on [DATE] with orders for Vancomycin and Cefepime. He stated Resident #1 had multiple missed doses of Vancomycin in July 2023. He stated the pharmacy wanted the nurses to communicate trough levels via fax prior to the medication being sent. S2NP stated he educated the nursing staff and the administration on the pharmacy's new protocol. He stated the nursing staff did not communicate Resident #1 missed doses of either Vancomycin or Cefepime. On 08/01/2023 at 1:21 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with S8RN. He confirmed working the weekend of 06/18/2023-06/19/2023. He stated a nurse reported Resident #1's Vancomycin was not available for administration. He said he directed the nurse to contact the pharmacy and the provider if she could not reach the pharmacy. He stated he did not know if the nurse contacted the pharmacy or if the medication was received and given. He confirmed he did not follow up with the nurse after she reported the medication as unavailable. On 08/01/2023 at 4:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S15LPN. She confirmed working on 07/22/2023 and 07/23/2023. She stated she did not administer Resident #1's Vancomycin on either day because the medication was not available. She stated she was not trained on the procedure if a resident was out of medication. On 08/02/2023 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She stated knew Resident #1 did not receive ordered Vancomycin in June 2023. She stated she in-serviced the floor nurses in June on Antibiotic Administration. She stated the nurses did not know the process for obtaining medications from the pharmacy when a resident was out. She stated if the medication was not available the nurses would not administer it and move on. She stated the nurses would not communicate missing medications with herself or the NP. She stated the in service included education on communicating with the ADON, DON, NP and the process to follow if a medication was not available. She stated on 07/11/2023, she received a call from the pharmacy requesting a trough level for Vancomycin and an order from the provider on the plan of care. She stated she educated and instructed the ADON's to oversee the Vancomycin trough levels and the NP order form. She stated the ADON's were responsible to communicate with the pharmacy and the NP. On 08/02/2023 at 3:30 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with contracted pharmacist. She stated the first time the pharmacy received an order for Resident #1 to start Vancomycin was on 06/19/2023. She confirmed the pharmacy did not receive an order for Resident #1 on 06/13/2023 and therefore did not send medication prior to 06/19/2023. She stated on 06/19/2023, the pharmacy sent 5 bags of Vancomycin to the facility. She stated on 06/21/2023, the facility requested 2 more bags of Vancomycin because they were out. The pharmacist said she sent 2 bags at that time, but the facility should not have been out of the medication. She stated the nurses reported they were giving the medication as ordered, but the Vancomycin trough levels suggested Resident #1 was not receiving the medication appropriately. She stated she called and communicated the suspected missing doses with S3DON in June 2023. She reported the facility had poor communication with pharmacy and would not provide needed information. She reported in July 2023, the pharmacy had the same issues with the facility and missing doses of medication so she spoke with 3DON again. On 08/03/2023 at 3:11 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5ADON. He stated it was the nurse's responsibility to communicate new medication orders with the pharmacy. If a medication was unavailable, the nurse should communicate with the pharmacy, NP/MD, ADON and DON. He stated the nurses did not report Resident #1 was out of Vancomycin in June or July 2023. He stated the medications should have been administered as ordered. On 08/04/2023 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S16LPN. She stated Resident #1 was not getting Vancomycin trough labs drawn so the Pharmacy would not send the Vancomycin in June 2023. She confirmed working on the morning of 06/18/2023. She stated she did not give Resident #1's Vancomycin as ordered because it was not available. She stated she notified S2NP and told him she did not have the medication. She stated she did not notify the Pharmacy. On 08/04/2023 at 10:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S6ADON. S6ADON confirmed knowing Resident #1 had missed doses of Vancomycin in June 20203. She explained in July 2023, S3DON instructed her to oversee the trough levels and communication with the lab and pharmacy. She stated after receiving trough results from the lab, she would then fax the labs to the pharmacy. She confirmed it was unacceptable that Resident #1 missed intravenous Vancomycin and Cefepime. On 08/02/2023 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. S3DON said if a resident's MAR was not initialed by the nurse, it meant the medication was not given. She also said if the MAR had circled initials, it also meant the medication not given. She reviewed Resident #1's clinical record and confirmed Resident #1 had an order for Vancomycin to start on 06/13/2023. She stated she did not know the resident missed doses of Vancomycin until 06/19/2023. She said the nurses did not know the process to follow if a resident was out of medications, so they did not give it. Resident #2 A review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Quadriplegia, UTI, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A review of Resident #2's Physician's Orders dated July 2023 revealed an order dated 07/12/2023 for Meropenem 1 gram IV every 8 hours for 7 days. Diagnosis: UTI. Further review revealed an order for Humalog sliding scale: 0-120: 0 units; 121-150: 2 units; 151-200: 4 units; 201-250: 6 units; 251-300: 9 units; 301-350: 12 units; 351-400: 15 units and call MD. A review of Resident #2's MAR dated July 2023 revealed Meropenem 1 gram IV every 8 hours was documented as not given on 07/14/2023 at 6:00 a.m. or 10:00 p.m., 07/15/2023 at 6:00 a.m. or 10:00 p.m., 07/16/2023 at 6:00 a.m., and 07/18/2023 at 10:00 p.m Further review of Resident #2's July 2023 MAR revealed: 07/14/2023 at 4:30 p.m., Accucheck result of 165 and no documentation of insulin administered. 07/19/2023 at 7:30 a.m., Accucheck result of 135 and no documentation of insulin administered. 07/27/2023 at 4:30 p.m., Accucheck result of 218 and documentation of incorrect insulin dose of 4 units administered. A review of Resident #2's nurses' notes revealed no documentation as to why the resident did not receive Meropenem, the incorrect insulin administrations or if the physician was notified. On 08/02/2023 at 11:18 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. S3DON reviewed Resident #2's July 2023 MAR. She confirmed there were blank boxes on the MAR that correlated with the above dates. She verified the blank boxes on the MAR meant the medication was not given. On 08/02/2023 at 12:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2NP. He verified he was not notified that Resident #2 missed doses of intravenous Meropenem in July 2023. He also confirmed he was not aware the resident received incorrect insulin coverage in July 2023. On 08/02/2023 at 1:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S12LPN. S12LPN reviewed Resident #2's July 2023 MAR. She verified the boxes for administration times on 07/14/2023, 07/15/2023, 7/16/2023 and 07/18/2023were blank. She stated if the boxes on the MAR were blank it meant the medication was not administered. Resident #3 A review of the clinical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Anoxic Brain Damage, Tracheostomy, Osteomyelitis, Congestive Heart Failure, Pressure Ulcer to Left Buttock, Stage 4, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Area, Stage 4, and Pressure Ulcer to Right Buttock, Stage 4, Gastrostomy Status, and Chronic Respiratory Failure A review of Resident #3's Physicians Orders for June 2023 revealed the following: 06/26/2023, Meropenem 1gm IV every 8 hours for 26 days; 06/26/2023, Albuterol 0.633 mg/3mL give 3 mL via neb every six hours prn wheezing; 06/26/2023, Budesonide 0.5 mg/2mL give 2 mL via neb BID x14 days; 06/26/2023, Duo-neb 0.5-3mg/3mL give 3 mL via neb every six hours prn wheezing; 06/26/2023, Lasix 40 mg administer one tablet per peg twice a day; and 06/26/2023, Levetiracetam 500 mg administer one tablet per peg twice a day. A review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2023 revealed Meropenem 1gm IV every 8 hours was not administered on 06/28/2023 at 2:00 p.m.; Lasix 40 mg 1 tablet per peg twice a day was not administered on 06/28/2023 at 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. and on 06/29/2023 at 6:00 a.m. and Keppra 500mg 1 tablet per peg tube twice a day was not administered on 06/28/2023 at 6:00 a.m. A review of the respiratory therapy documentation for Resident #3 revealed Budesonide 0.5 mg/2mL give 2 mL via nebulizer BID was not administered on 06/26/2023, 06/27/2023, or 06/28/2023. A review of the Transfer Log revealed Resident #3 was transferred to the emergency room on [DATE] due to a critical H&H. A review of Resident #3's Physicians Orders for July 2023 revealed the following: 07/01/2023, Albuterol-Ipratropium 2.5mg-2.5/3mL give 3mL by neb every six hours; 07/01/2023 and 07/19/2023, Levetiracetam 500mg/5mL administer 5mL per peg twice daily; 07/19/2023, Lasix 40 mg administer one tablet per peg daily; 07/19/2023, Enoxaparin 40 mg administer subcutaneous daily; and 07/19/2023, Duo-neb 2.5-0.5 mg/3 mL give 3mL via neb every six hours A review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2023 revealed the following: Lasix 40 mg 1 tablet per peg tube twice a day was not administered on 07/01/2023 at 6:00 p.m. or 07/28/2023 at 5:00 a.m.; Levetiracetam 500mg/5mL solution, 5 mL solution per peg tube twice a day was not administered on 07/03/2023 and 07/28/2023 at 6:00 a.m., 07/04/2023, 07/20/2023 and 07/21/2023 at 6:00 p.m. and Enoxaparin 40 mg/0.4mL (0.4 mL=40 mg) into the skin subcutaneous daily was not administered on 0
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently by failing to implement a system to provide quality care to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to ensure a functional system was in place to acquire, receive, transcribe, and implement accurate physician orders for 7 ( #1,#2,#3,#4, #R1, #R2, #R3) out of 8 ( #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #R1, #R2, #R3) residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #1, a dependent resident with an infected Stage 4 Sacral Wound, on 06/13/2023 at 2:30 p.m. when nursing staff failed to communicate a new Physician's Order for intravenous Vancomycin to the pharmacy. From 06/15/2023 through 06/19/2023, Resident #1 missed 7 of the 10 doses ordered of intravenous Vancomycin which resulted in further wound infection. On 06/22/2023, S2NP transferred Resident #1 to the emergency room after noting the sacral wound had a foul odor and purulent drainage. Resident #1 returned to the facility on [DATE] with a new Physician's Order to continue intravenous Vancomycin for the Sacral Wound Infection. Nursing staff continued to miss doses of the intravenous Vancomycin as ordered. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #3 on 06/26/2023 when respiratory staff failed to administer scheduled breathing treatments twice a day as ordered. Resident #3 had a tracheostomy and was oxygen dependent. On 07/01/2023 and 07/19/2023 nursing staff failed to communicate new orders to respiratory staff. During this time, nursing staff also failed to administer oral, subcutaneous, and IV medications. On 07/15/2023 Resident #3 was found with a faint pulse and with decreased oxygen levels. Resident #3's respirations were labored and shallow. Resident #3 required tracheostomy suctioning, became apneic and required manual breathing. This led to a hospitalization on 07/15/2023 for respiratory distress. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident #R1 on 07/21/2023, a ventilator dependent resident, when respiratory staff failed to administer scheduled breathing treatments every 8 hours as ordered. Resident #R1 did not receive scheduled breathing treatments after 4:00 p.m. on 07/21/2023 through 07/25/2023, which resulted in the resident experiencing respiratory distress. Resident #R1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Sepsis with Severe Septic Shock. Resident #R1 returned to the facility on [DATE] with a Physician's Order for intravenous Cefepime. On 08/02/2023 nursing staff failed to administer the 6:00 a.m. dose of Cefepime to Resident #R1. On 08/02/2023 at 1:00 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #R1 receiving intravenous Meropenem, which was not prescribed to Resident #R1. Resident #R1 was readmitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Sepsis with Septic Shock, Pneumonia and Hypoxia. S1ADM was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation on 08/04/2023 at 7:01 p.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/08/2023 at 2:20 p.m. when the provider presented an acceptable plan of removal. Through observation, interview and record review, the surveyors confirmed the following components of the plan of removal had been initiated and/or implemented prior to exit. Plan of removal: The following actions were taken immediately upon notification on 08/04/2023 to correct noncompliant practices. 1.) Medication Administration, Documentation and Translation of orders: In-services were conducted with weekend staff to ensure all nurses were educated on medication administration, documentation, translation, antibiotic administration, medication availability, pharmacy communication process and communication between Nursing and Respiratory Staff. -100% of all residents' medical records were reviewed to ensure accuracy of physician orders. - Medication pass observations were done on every nurse on every shift during the entire weekend by one of either the DON, Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse, ADONs and RN Supervisor to ensure competency and compliance. -100% of all medication carts were looked at and cleaned up by DON, Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse, ADONs and RN Supervisor to ensure competency and compliance. Pharmacy communication policy and guidelines were immediately put in place by DON, Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse, ADONs and RN Supervisor to ensure competency and compliance. -All residents' receiving antibiotics were identified and a surveillance spreadsheet was created for direct observation of nurses administering the medication. -Education was provided to nursing staff in the case that antibiotics were unavailable. Nurses were educated to contact MD, DON and RR Nurses were educated on documenting the unavailability of antibiotic and what steps were taken. All residents receiving Respiratory orders were identified and compared to the Respiratory Medication Administration Record. - Nurses and Respiratory therapists were educated on communicating new Respiratory orders. All shifts beginning on 08/04/2023 night shift through 08/07/2023 day shift were educated and observed on medication administration, documentation and translation; antibiotic administration, and communication between nursing and respiratory therapist on new and existing orders. -All nurses will complete an initial medication pass observation, observed by DON or designee. Random medication passes will be performed throughout the quarter. (To continue to be monitored until QA board deems monitoring has been effective by September 22, 2023). Policies have been reviewed. No changes determined to be necessary. 2.) Identification of other residents having the potential to be affected was accomplished by: The facility has determined that all residents have the potential to be affected. Actions taken/systems put into place to reduce the risk of future occurrence include: -On 08/04/2023, Administrator and DON were educated by Regional Corporate Consulting Nurse regarding the job duties and responsibilities associated with administering medications as ordered (by mouth, intravenous, respiratory), the 5 Rights to medication administration and medication availability. Completed by 08/04/2023. The following training with nurses and respiratory therapists began on 08/04/2023 and will be completed by 08/09/2023: -Immediate complete competency checks on existing nursing staff related to medication administration (see new process attached), documentation, and transcription of orders. -New staff and contract staff will be educated on AHT, medication administration processes, documentation, transcription, medication refill process and pharmacy communication. All competencies will be completed before working independently with residents. -Communication between Nursing and Respiratory on any new and existing Respiratory orders by providing new admission or readmission order set to Respiratory Manager or designee. New orders to be copied and handed to Respiratory Manager or designee. Daily monitoring by Respiratory Manager or designee or new orders to be placed in Respiratory box. -Nurses responsible to send medication refills when indicated. Stickers to be pulled from medication blister packs when indicated and faxed to pharmacy. -Nurse to initial, time and date fax sheet that was sent to pharmacy. Once faxed, sheet to be put in ADON boxes. Pharmacy delivery receipts to be placed in ADON boxes once medication arrives at facility. -Power point education to be handed out to entire nursing staff explaining order entering, skin assessments, admission processes, and skilled documentation. A copy of all education will be laminated and placed on all med carts. The Administrator will review the implementation of the following beginning on 08/04/2023 and will be completed by 09/22/2023: -All nurses will complete an initial medication pass observation, observed by DON or designee. Random medication passes will be performed throughout the quarter. (To continue to be monitored until quarterly QA board deems monitoring has been effective by September 22, 2023). - For ongoing compliance, the DON or designee will conduct weekly medication cart, EMR and medication storage audits starting weekly x 4, then monthly ongoing for Quality Control and to ensure availability of medications for administration. -The DON and or designees will also conduct medication administration observations at random, 1 on each shift, weekly x 4, then ongoing CQI. -The DON or designee will notify the administrator of the findings of the audit and medication administration observation. -ADONs to review pharmacy delivery receipts daily and compare with faxed medication sheets to ensure all medications have been delivered. (To continue to be monitored until quarterly QA board deems monitoring has been effective by September 22, 2023). -ADONs or designee to communicate with pharmacy (Monday-Friday) to ensure receipt of faxes. (To continue to be monitored until quarterly QA board deems monitoring has been effective by September 22, 2023). Oversight by DON or designee of pharmacy process weekly. -Weekly in-services targeted to reorient current nursing staff on Antibiotic availability and administration, Al-IT, Medication administration, documentation, and transcription to be completed by ADONs and DON. (To continue to be monitored until quarterly QA board deems monitoring has been effective by September 22, 2023). -All new orders to be pulled and checked by ADON's or designee daily (Monday through Friday) in the morning. Oversight by DON or designee weekly. -Communication between Nursing and Respiratory on any new and existing Respiratory orders by providing new admission or readmission order set to Respiratory Manager or designee. New orders to be copied and handed to Respiratory Manager or designee. Daily monitoring by Respiratory Manager or designee or new orders to be placed in Respiratory box. -The Regional Nurse or designee will conduct quarterly checks to determine compliance with the completion of the audits by the DON or designee and to identify trends and areas of continued noncompliance. 4. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur: This plan of correction will be monitored at the monthly Quality Assurance meeting. QA Board to deem effective systems in place by September 22, 2023 via DON report of findings, to assure consistent substantial compliance. This plan of correction will be monitored at the Quality Assurance meeting at least quarterly, optimal monthly at QA progress meetings to ensure consistent substantial compliance. This deficient practice continued at more than minimal harm for the remaining residents identified by the facility as receiving medications. Findings: Cross reference: F-726 Cross Reference F-684 On 08/01/2023 at 12:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2NP. S2NP stated in June 2023, he was aware Resident #1 was not receiving intravenous Vancomycin as ordered for an infected pressure ulcer. He stated he notified facility's DON about it. He stated Resident #1's wound abscessed and he sent Resident #1 to the hospital for a higher level of wound treatment. S2NP stated Resident #1 returned to the facility on [DATE] with orders for intravenous Vancomycin and Cefepime. He stated after re-admission, the nurses continued to fail to administer IV antibiotics as ordered. On 08/01/2023 at 1:21 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S8RN. He stated he was the RN Supervisor on weekends. He stated a nurse had informed him intravenous Vancomycin was not available on the weekend of June18th - June 19th. He stated he did not remember which resident. S8RN sated he instructed the nurse to follow up with the provider and pharmacy. He stated he did not follow up with the nurse to verify the medication was available and administered. On 08/01/2023 at 4:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S15LPN. She stated she was not trained on the procedure to follow when a resident's medication was unavailable. On 08/02/2023 at 1:00 p.m., an observation of Resident #R1 was performed. S3DON observed the bag of IV medicine hanging and verified the bag of medicine was full and labeled for 6:00 a.m., therefore the resident missed that dose. The label on the bag of IV medicine infusing was observed and had a different resident's name. S3DON confirmed Meropenem was infusing and Resident #R1 was not prescribed Meropenem. She verified Resident #R1 was prescribed Cefepime 2 gm/100 ml IV every 8 hours and confirmed the resident received the wrong medication. On 08/02/2023 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She stated she was aware Resident #1 did not receive intravenous Vancomycin as ordered in June 2023. She stated the nurses did not know the process for obtaining medications from the pharmacy when medications were unavailable. She stated the nurses had not communicated missing medications to her or the NP. She stated she educated nursing staff in June 2023 on the process for acquiring medications if they were not available. She verified residents were not receiving medications as ordered following her educating staff. On 08/02/2023 at 3:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with the contracted pharmacist. She stated she called S3DON in June 2023 and again in July 2023 to report she suspected IV antibiotics were not being administered as ordered and nursing staff were not communicating the Vancomycin trough levels and NP orders to the pharmacy. On 08/03/2023 at 12:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S22RT. She confirmed the respiratory department administered all nebulizer treatments. She stated the respiratory department does not have access to electronic medical records. She stated the process should be for the nurses to bring a copy of new orders to the respiratory department so they can be implemented. She confirmed the respiratory department did not receive new orders for Resident #3 on 07/02/2023 for Albuterol-Ipratropium 2.5mg-2.5/3mL or on 07/19/2023 for Duo-neb 2.5-0.5 mg/3mL. She verified if the respiratory department did not receive the orders then the medications were not administered. She confirmed Budesonide 0.5 mg/2mL via nebulizer was not administered to Resident #3 for the p.m. doses on 06/26/2023, 06/27/2023 and 06/28/2023 and could not verify why the doses were missed. On 08/03/2023 at 2:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with S21RTD. She verified Iprat-Albut 0.5-3(2.5) mg/3 ml was not documented as administered for Resident #R3 from 07/21/2023 through 07/25/2023 when the resident was transferred to the hospital. S2RTD reported there were no processes in place to ensure residents received respiratory medications and treatments as ordered. On 08/03/2023 at 3:11 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5ADON. He stated it was the nurse's responsibility to communicate new medication orders with the pharmacy. He stated if a medication was unavailable, the nurse should communicate with the pharmacy, NP/MD, ADON, and DON. He stated medications should have been available and administered as ordered. On 08/04/2023 at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with S16LPN. She stated she did not give Resident #1's intravenous Vancomycin as ordered because it was not available. She stated she did not notify the Pharmacy.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily l...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received assistance with turning every two hours for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #5) residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to ensure a resident was turned every two hours to prevent the resident's pressure ulcer worsening. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses, which included Traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction, Quadriplegia, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage 4, and Cellulitis. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/02/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed Resident #1 was dependent on staff for all ADLs. Review of Resident #1's current care plan revealed the resident was care planned for being dependent on staff for all ADL's d/t quadriplegia and turned and repositioned every two hours. Review of Resident #1's ADL Care Log from May 2023 through July 2023revealed Resident #1 was not turned and repositioned every two hours on the following dates: 05/01/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/02/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/03/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/04/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/05/2023, 05/06/2023- No documentation on the 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. shifts, 05/07/2023- No documentation on the11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. shifts, 05/08/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/09/2023- No documentation on the 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. shifts, 05/10/2023- No documentation on the 7:00 a.m. -3:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. shifts, 05/11/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/12/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/13/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/14/2023 - No documentation for all shifts, 05/15/2023- No documentation on the 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. shifts, 05/16/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/17/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/18/2023- No documentation on the 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. shifts, 05/19/2023- No documentation for all shifts,- 05/20/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/21/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/23/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/24/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/25/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/26/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/27/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/28/2023- No documentation on the 11:00 p.m. -7:00 a.m. shift 05/29/2023- No documentation on the 7:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. shifts, 05/30/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 05/31/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/01/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/02/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/03/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/04/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/05/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/06/2023- No documentation on the 11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. shifts, 06/07/2023-No documentation on the 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. -7:00 a.m. shifts, 06/08/2023- No documentation on the 3:00 p.m. -11:00 p.m. and 11:00 pm. -7:00 a.m. shifts, 06/09/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/10/2023- No documentation for all shifts,- 06/11/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/12/2023- No documentation for all shifts,- 06/13/2023- No documentation on the 3:00 p.m. -11:00 p.m. and 11:00 pm. -7:00 a.m. shifts, 6/14/2023- No documentation on the 11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. shifts, 06/15/2023-No documentation on the 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. -7:00 a.m. shifts, 06/16/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/17/2023- No documentation for all shifts,- 06/18/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/19/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/20/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/21/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 06/22/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 07/13/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 07/14/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 07/18/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 07/20/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 07/21/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 07/22/2023- No documentation for all shifts, 07/24/2023- No documentation for all shifts. 07/27/2023- No documentation for all shifts 07/29/2023- No documentation for all shifts. Review of the current Nurse's Note revealed on 06/02/2023 Resident #1 was seen by the S2NP for a deteriorating Stage 4 sacral wound. Review of the Physician's Progress Notes dated June 2023 to present revealed Resident #1's wound noted to be deteriorating and was sent to the ER on [DATE]. Resident #1 was referred to a local Long Term Acute Center for IV antibiotics, aggressive wound debridement and negative pressure wound treatment. A review of Resident #1's Hospital Records revealed the following: On 06/22/2023 Resident #1 arrived at the Emergency Department with a chief complaint of a large sacral wound. In the Emergency Department Resident #1 was examined by a Physician which revealed Resident #1 had a large Stage IV Sacral Decubitus Wound. Labs were drawn in the Emergency Department on 06/22/2023 which revealed: RBC: 3.24 (low), Hemoglobin: 6.9 (low), Hematocrit 23.8 (low) and Albumin 2.2 (-low). The Emergency Department Provider notes revealed Resident #1's labs were significant for severe anemia and likely secondary from bleeding from his sacral wound. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital for abnormal labs and received 1 unit of packed red blood cells. Resident #1's wound was debrided on 06/26/2023. On 07/13/2023 at 11:49 a.m. an interview was conducted with S20CNA. She stated she is familiar with Resident #1. She stated Resident #1 was dependent on staff for all ADL care. She stated when she completed her ADL care she initialed the ADL sheet in the binder at the nurse's desk. She stated if it was not initialed then it meant the ADL care was not complete. On 07/31/2023 at 11:57 a.m. an interview was conducted Resident #1. He stated the staff does not turn him every two hours. On 08/01/2023 at 12:45 p.m. an interview was conducted with S2NP. He stated Resident #1's sacral pressure wound had worsened and he believed it was because Resident #1 was not being turned as often as needed. He stated his wound abscessed, had an odor and purulent drainage. He stated Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for a higher level of wound care. On 08/03/2023 at 11:18 a.m. an interview was conducted with S3DON. S3DON reviewed the aforementioned findings and confirmed if ADL care was not charted than it meant it was not completed. She stated it was expected for the staff to turn the Resident #1 every two hours to prevent worsening of Resident #1's pressure ulcer.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment, and to help prevent the development and t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) residents observed for wound care. Findings: Review of the facility's Clean Dressing Change policy revealed the following, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross-contamination. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. Each wound will be treated individually. 10. Remove gloves, pulling inside out over the dressing. Discard into appropriate receptacle. 11. Wash hands and put on clean gloves. Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed admission date of 07/19/2023 with diagnoses, which included Osteomyelitis, Pressure Ulcer to Left Buttock, Stage 4, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Area, Stage 4, and Pressure Ulcer to Right Buttock, Stage 4. On 07/31/2023 at 2:28 p.m., an observation was made of S13LPNWCN performing wound care. S13LPNWCN cleaned Resident #3's left ischium, right ischium, and sacral wounds, applied treatments, packing and dressings all while wearing the same pair of soiled gloves. Without removing her soiled gloves or performing hand hygiene, S13LPNWCN cleaned the resident's perineal area at the urinary catheter entry site three times with incontinent wipe, which was noted to have bright red blood. Without removing her soiled gloves or performing hand hygiene, she rehung the resident's catheter bag on the bed frame and repositioned the resident. She touched Resident #3's gown, draw sheet, top sheet, and side rails using the same pair of soiled gloves. She also confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene nor change gloves while performing wound care to all three wounds and before and after performing perineal care, and she should have. On 07/31/2023 at 3:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON. She confirmed all three wounds should have been treated individually. S3DON verified the wound care nurse should not have used the same pair of gloves to perform wound care to each wound. S3DON stated she also expected her to changes gloves when going from clean to dirty and perform hand hygiene.
Apr 2023 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of n...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of needs for 2 (#4 and R6) of 11 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #4 and R6 to call for assistance when needed. Findings: Review of the facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response Policy revealed the following: Policy: The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 4. With each interaction in the resident's room or bathroom, staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Acute Respiratory Failure with Anoxic Brain Damage, Paralysis, and Tracheostomy. Review of Resident #4's admission MDS with an ARD of 02/08/2023 revealed a BIMS of 7, which indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed Resident #4 was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. On 04/03/2023 at 2:10 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #4. He resided on the ventilator unit and had a tracheostomy connected to oxygen. A call light was not observed within his reach. An adaptive call light was observed under Resident #4's bed on the floor. On 04/03/2023 at 2:18 p.m., an interview as conducted with Resident #4. He stated he did not have a call light to notify staff when he needed assistance. He stated he was paralyzed and could not use his arms and legs. He stated someone told him they could get him a call light he would be able to use, but no one ever did. He stated a few days ago he experienced shortness of breath but was unable to get help right away due to not having a call light. He stated when staff members passed by, he would make a sound with his mouth to try to get their attention when he needed assistance. On 04/03/2023 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S17CNA. She stated Resident #4 was completely dependent on staff for ADL care. She stated Resident #4 had an adaptive call light. On 04/03/2023 at 2:33 p.m., an observation was made with S17CNA of Resident #4's call light. His adaptive call light was underneath his bed on the floor. S17CNA confirmed Resident #4's call light was on the floor and out of his reach. S17CNA stated Resident #4's adaptive call light should have been by his face so he could call for assistance if needed. R6 Review of R6's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction and Tracheostomy. Review of R6's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/06/2023 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review revealed R6 was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility. Review of R6's Care Plan revealed a diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Accident with interventions including assist with all ADLs as needed. R6 had a problem of impaired mobility with interventions including assist with positioning, transfers, and ambulation as necessary or as requested by resident. On 04/04/2023 at 10:55 a.m., an observation was made of R6. She resided on the ventilator unit and had a tracheostomy. S19CNA was observed leaving R6's room. Surveyor entered room and observed R6's call light hanging behind her bed and lying on the floor. On 04/04/2023 at 11:11 a.m., an interview was conducted with R6. She stated there were several times throughout the day when her call light would not be within her reach. She stated some days her call light would not be within her reach at all. She stated when she could not reach her call light, she would take the remote that raised the head of her bed and bang it against her bedside table to get staffs' attention. On 04/05/2023 at 12:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S14CNA. She stated she was assigned to R6 and was familiar with her. She stated R6 banged her remote against her bedside table at times throughout the day to get staffs' attention. On 04/05/2023 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. She confirmed all call lights should be within reach of each resident at all times.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) residents reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to ensure a grievance was promptly investigated when Resident #1 notified S2ADON about concerns he had on 04/01/2023 and 04/03/2023. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Benign Neoplasm of the Spinal Cord. Review of Resident #1's Annual MDS with an ARD of 01/19/2023 revealed a BIMS Summary score of 15, which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's Grievance Log dated April 2023 revealed no grievances filed for Resident #1. Review of the facility's Grievance Policy revealed, in part: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 4. A resident or family member may voice grievances with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay. 8. Grievances may be voiced in the following forums: b. Written complaint to a staff member or Grievance Official. 10. Procedure b. The staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form, or assist the resident or family member to complete the form. c. Forward the grievance form to the Grievance Official as soon as practicable. d. The Grievance Official will take steps to resolve the grievance, and record information about the grievance, and those actions, on the grievance form. On 04/05/2023 at 10:20 a.m., a request was made from S1DON for grievances from April 2023, and she stated the facility had no grievances for April 2023. Review of an email sent to S2ADON from Resident #1 on 04/01/2023 and 04/03/2023 revealed the following, in part: 04/01/2023 - I'd like to bring a couple of things to your attention. Friday night I did not have one CNA come in my room at all to check my urinal, to see if I needed water, etc. I cannot tell you who my CNA was since no one ever came in my room. They served the food on Styrofoam on Saturday. I did not get lunch until 1:20 p.m., and the meal was ice cold. 04/03/2023 - Resident #1 complained about not getting double portions, soup with no liquid, and having soggy bread with a small amount of tuna fish. On 04/03/2023 at 11:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. He stated the night CNA on the 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. shift, never came into his room Friday night. He said he reported this to S2ADON and someone else the other day. He said he had tried to tell a staff member before then, but they told him they were short staffed. He said this issue and an issue with dietary was discussed with S2ADON in an email sent on Saturday, 04/01/2023. He said S2ADON replied he is looking into his complaints. He said when he had a complaint, the staff doesn't relay the message to the supervisor. On 04/05/2023 at 1:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADON. He confirmed he received the above email from Resident #1. He confirmed a grievance form was not filled out and he did not notify S4HR. On 04/05/2023 at 2:03 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4HR. She stated she was the grievance officer. She confirmed she had not received a grievance from Resident #1. She stated S2ADON should have filled out a grievance form and given it to her. On 04/05/2023 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. She verified no one notified her of a grievance for Resident #1. She confirmed S2ADON should have filled out a grievance form and followed the facility's policy.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's st...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status. The facility failed to ensure 1 (#2) of 11 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6) residents reviewed for Resident Assessment had an accurate MDS that reflected the resident's active diagnosis of anxiety Findings: Review of Resident #2's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnosed with Anxiety Disorder on 01/02/2023. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/07/2023 revealed a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #2's MDS revealed the following: Section I-Active Diagnosis I5700: Anxiety Disorder: Unchecked Review of Resident #2's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part: Start date: 02/08/2023, End date: 02/22/2023-Ativan 0.5 mg per PEG twice daily as needed times 14 days for anxiety. Start date: 02/24/2023, End date: 03/10/2023- Ativan 0.5 mg per PEG twice daily as needed times 14 days for anxiety. Start date: 03/11/2023, End date: 03/25/2023- Ativan 0.5 mg per PEG twice daily as needed times 14 days for anxiety. Review of Resident #2's MAR dated April 2023 revealed the following, in part: Ativan 0.5mg tablet-Administer 1 tablet per PEG tube twice a day as needed for anxiety disorder On 04/05/2023 at 11:52 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3MDS. She stated she was responsible for resident's MDS assessments. She stated Resident #2's current MDS opened on 03/07/2023 and closed 04/04/2023. She reviewed Resident #2's MDS, her active diagnoses, and the physician orders. She confirmed Resident #2's MDS was not checked for anxiety under Section I-Active Diagnosis and should have been. On 04/05/2023 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. She reviewed Resident #2's MDS with an ARD of 03/07/2023. She confirmed anxiety was not checked under the Active Diagnosis section and should have been.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (#1) of 11 sampled residents. The facility failed to accurately document Resident #1's medications on the Medication Administration Record. Findings: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Medication Administration revealed, in part; Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 9. Review MAR to identify medication to be administered. 15. Sign MAR after administered. Resident # 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included, in part; Benign Neoplasm Of The Spinal Cord. A review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2023, February 2023, and March 2023 revealed the following Medications listed: Pregabalin 150 mg, administer 1 capsule three times a day. Order was written on 05/15/2022. Baclofen 20mg tablet, administer 1 tablet by mouth three times a day. Order written on 05/15/2022. Methocarbamol 500 mg tablet, administer 1 tablet by mouth three times a day. Order was written on 05/22/2022. Tamsulosin HCL 0.4mg capsule, administer 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime. Order was written on 05/15/2022. Further review of Resident #1's MAR's revealed there were no documentation of initials Pregabalin 150mg was administered for the following shifts: 01/31/2023 10:00 p.m. 02/14/2023 10:00 p.m. 02/15/2023 6:00 a.m. 02/21/2023 10:00 p.m. 02/22/2023 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 02/23/2023 6:00 a.m. 03/02/2023 6:00 a.m. 03/08/2023 10:00 p.m. 03/09/2023 6:00 a.m. 03/22/2023 2:00 p.m. 03/23/2023 2:00 p.m. 03/31/2023 10:00 p.m. Further review of Resident #1's MAR's revealed that there were no documentation of initials Baclofen 20mg was administered for the following shifts: 02/14/2023 10:00 p.m. 02/15/2023 6:00 a.m. 02/21/2023 10:00 p.m. 02/22/2023 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 02/23/2023 6:00 a.m. 03/02/2023 6:00 a.m. 03/08/2023 8:00 p.m. 03/09/2023 6:00 a.m. 03/22/2023 2:00 p.m. 03/23/2023 2:00 p.m. 03/30/2023 2:00 p.m. 03/31/2023 10:00 p.m. Further review of Resident #1's MAR's revealed there were no documentation of initials Methocarbamol 500mg was administered for the following shifts: 02/14/2023 10:00 p.m. 02/15/2023 6:00 a.m. 02/21/2023 10:00 p.m. 02/22/2023 10:00 p.m. 02/26/2023 10:00 p.m. 03/02/2023 6:00 a.m. 03/08/2023 8:00 p.m. 03/09/2023 6:00 a.m. 03/22/2023 2:00 p.m. 03/23/2023 2:00 p.m. 03/30/2023 2:00 p.m. 03/31/2023 10:00 p.m. Further review of Resident #1's MAR's revealed there were no documentation of initials Tamsulosin HCL 0.4mg was administered for the following 9:00 p.m. shifts: 02/14/2023 02/21/2023 02/22/2023 03/02/2023 03/08/2023 03/09/2023 03/31/2023 On 04/05/2023 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON during which she reviewed Resident #1's Medication Administration Record for January 2023, February 2023, and March 2023. She confirmed there were missing documentation for several dates of medications and she confirmed she expected all nurses complete documentation on the MAR.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities based on comprehensive assessments, care plans and preferences for 3 (#1, #2, and R5) of 11 sampled residents. The total facility census was 102 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Activities policy revealed, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences . Definitions: Activities refer to any endeavor, other than routine ADLs, in which a resident participates that is intended to enhance her/his sense of well-being and to promote or enhance physical cognitive, and emotional health. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 12. Activities can occur at any time and are not limited to formal activities provided by the activities staff and can include other facility staff members, volunteers, visitors, residents, and family members. Review of the March 2023 Activities Calendar revealed an activity was scheduled each day of March. Review of the April 2023 Activities Calendar revealed activities were scheduled 12 of the 30 days of April. Resident #1 A Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, in part: Benign Neoplasm of Spinal Cord. A review of Resident #1's current Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/19/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. On 04/03/2023 at 11:15 a.m., an observation was made of Resident # 1's room, there were no books, puzzles, or any notable things for activities. On 04/03/2023 at 11:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. He said there haven't been any activities being done since the Activity Director left about a month ago. On 04/03/2023 at 1:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S13CNA. She said they don't have an Activity Director now and she had not seen any activities going on. She said she doesn't have time to do activities with the residents because she is so busy. On 04/04/2023 at 10:28 a.m., an interview was conducted with S14CNA. She stated the Activity Director left the facility a couple of weeks prior, and residents had not had any activities since she left. Resident #2 A review of the clinical record for Resident #2 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included, in part: Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Tracheostomy, PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy), Quadriplegia, and Anxiety Disorder. A review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/07/2023 revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. On 04/04/2023 at 9:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #2. She stated she went to the gym for therapy but had not been offered any other activities. At that time an observation was made. There were no books, crossword puzzles, or any other activities in her room for her to participate in. On 04/04/2023 at 10:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S19CNA. She stated no activities had been offered to the residents since the Activities Director quit a month ago. Resident #R5 A review of the clinical record for Resident #R5 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, in part: Spinal Cord Injury. A review of the Quarterly MDS with ARD of 02/08/2023, revealed Resident #R5 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted on 04/04/2023 at 10:50 a.m. with Resident #R5. He stated since the Activity Director left a couple of weeks ago, he had not had any activities performed with him by staff. An interview was conducted on 04/03/2023 at 3:30 p.m. with S10LPN. She stated the Activity Director left the facility about 2 ½ weeks ago, and residents had not had any activities since the Activity Director left. An interview was conducted on 04/03/2023 at 3:32 p.m. with S13CNA. She stated the Activity Director left the facility about 2 ½ weeks ago, and residents had not had any activities since then. An interview was conducted on 04/03/2023 at 3:35 p.m. with S15CNA. She stated the Activity Director left the facility about 2 ½ weeks ago. She stated since the Activity Director left, residents had not had any activities. An interview was conducted on 04/03/2023 at 3:40 p.m. with S18CNA. She stated the Activity Director left the facility about 2 ½ weeks ago, and residents had not had any activities since. On 04/03/2023, 04/04/2023, and 04/05/2023 observations were made by survey team from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. with no observations of activities performed with any residents. On 04/05/2023 at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. She verified there have been no activities at the facility since the Activity Director left on 03/08/2023.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means rece...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding by failing to ensure tube feeding formula, tubing, and free water bags were appropriately labeled for 4 (R1, R2, R3, and R4) of 7 (#2, #4, #5, R1, R2, R3, and R4) residents reviewed for tube feedings. Findings: R1 Review of the clinical record for R1 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Gastrostomy Status and Dysphagia. Review of the current Physician Orders for R1, revealed, in part, the following: Isosource 1.5 at 50mL/hr per peg tube continuously daily. An observation was made on 04/03/2023 at 9:20 a.m. of R1 in her room. R1's tube feeding solution of Isosource 1.5 was infusing with no labeling of date or time on tubing, feeding solution, or bag of free water. An interview was conducted on 04/03/2023 at 9:25 a.m. with S8LPN in R1's room. She stated the night shift nurse was responsible for changing tube feeding solution, bags, and tubing. She confirmed the night shift nurse did not label date and time on the feeding solution for R1. She confirmed the feeding solution, tubing, and bag of free water should have been labeled by the night shift when the feeding was started. R2 Review of the clinical record for R2 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Gastrostomy Status and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Review of the current Physician Orders for R2 revealed, in part, the following: Isosource 1.5 at 50mL/hr per peg tube continuously daily. An observation was made on 04/03/2023 at 9:32 a.m. of R2 in her room. R2's tube feeding solution of Isosource 1.5 was infusing with no labeling of date or time on tubing, feeding solution, or bag of free water. R3 Review of the clinical record for R3 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Gastrostomy Status and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Review of the current Physician Orders for R3 revealed, in part, the following: Isosource 1.5 at 50mL/hr per peg tube continuously daily. An observation was made on 04/03/2023 at 9:33 a.m. of R3 in her room. R3's tube feeding solution of Isosource 1.5 was infusing with no labeling of date or time on tubing, feeding solution, or bag of free water. R4 Review of the clinical record for R4 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dysphagia and Gastrostomy Status. Review of the current Physician Orders for R4 revealed, in part, the following: Isosource 1.5 at 65mL/hr per peg tube continuously daily. An observation was made on 04/03/2023 at 9:36 a.m. of R4 in her room. R4's tube feeding solution of Isosource 1.5 was infusing with no labeling of date or time on tubing, feeding solution, or bag of free water. An interview was conducted on 04/03/2023 at 9:40 a.m. with S9LPN. S9LPN observed R2, R3, and R4's tube feeding. She confirmed R2, R3, and R4's feeding solution, tubing, and bag of free water should have been labeled by the night shift when the feeding started, but they were not. An interview was conducted on 04/04/2023 at 2:55 p.m. with S1DON. She confirmed all feeding solution bags, free water bags, and tubing should be labeled with the date, time, infusion rate, and initials of nurse that spiked the formula bag. She stated she expected the nurses to ensure this was done when the feeding solution was started.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient Certified Nursing Assistant staff, Licensed Nursi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient Certified Nursing Assistant staff, Licensed Nursing staff, and Respiratory Therapy staff to provide direct care and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 2 (#1 and #R5) of 11 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, and #R6) residents reviewed for staffing. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the facility's total census of 102 residents. Findings: Review of the PBJ Staffing Report for Fiscal Year 2023 Quarter 1 (10/01/2022 - 12/31/2022), with a run date of 04/04/2023, revealed the facility had a 1-star staffing rating. Review of facility Census List on 04/03/2023 revealed the facility's census was 102 residents with 21 of those residents being on the ventilator hall. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool dated 09/30/2022 revealed the facility assessed the following staffing needs: Staffing plan: Example 1. Evaluation of overall number of facility staff needed to ensure a sufficient number of qualified staff are available to meet each resident's needs. Licensed nurses providing direct care -12-13, and Nurse Aides - 24-28. Example 2. Licensed Nurses (LN) RN, LPN, LVN providing direct care: LPN Charge Nurse, LPN Wound Care Nurse, RN Wound Care Nurse, Days: 5 LPNs, Nights: 5 LPNs 2 Respiratory Therapist Days 2 Respiratory Therapist Nights Review of the Personnel Staffing Assignment Sheets and schedules, dated 03/01/2023 through 04/04/2023, revealed, in part, the facility staffed the following number of CNAs, Licensed Nurses, and Respiratory Therapist on the following dates and times: 03/01/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. - 5 CNAs 03/02/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/03/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 3 CNAs -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 5 CNAs 03/04/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 4 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/05/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 6 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 3 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/06/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -7:00 p.m. -. 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. - 4 CNAs 03/07/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 3 Nurses 03/08/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 5 CNAs -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 5 CNAs 03/09/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 5 CNAs 03/10/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 6 CNAs -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 CNAs 03/11/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 4 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 CNAs 03/12/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 4 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 CNAs 03/13/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 5 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 3 CNAs 03/14/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist 03/15/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 6 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 3 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/16/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 6 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 2 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/17/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 4 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/18/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 4 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/19/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 5 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 4 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 3 CNAs 03/20/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 3 CNAs 03/21/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist 03/22/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 3 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 5 CNAs 03/23/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/24/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 10 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 6 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/25/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 10 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 5 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 3 CNAs 03/26/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 4 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 3 CNAs 03/27/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 6 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/28/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 3.5 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/29/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 6 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs 03/30/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 10 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 5 CNAs 03/31/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 5 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 1 Respiratory Therapist -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 5 CNAs 04/01/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 3 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 5 CNAs 04/02/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 2 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 3 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 5 CNAs 04/03/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 8 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 4 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 3 CNAs 04/04/2023 -7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. - 4 Nurses -7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - 9 CNAs -3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. - 7 CNAs -7:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 4 Nurses -11:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. - 6 CNAs Resident #1 Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, in part: Benign Neoplasm of Spinal Cord. A review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/19/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating Resident #1 was cognitively intact. The resident required one to two people's physical assistance with ADLs. On 04/03/2023 at 11:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #1. He said he received a bath about once a week and was supposed to get a bath on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. He said two of the CNAs doesn't give a good bath or either he doesn't get a bath at all. He said when he pressed his call light about 3 weeks ago, at 2:15 p.m., the aid came in at 4:30 p.m , and said she had something to do and would be right in, the second time he pressed his call light was 7:30 p.m., it took her 45 minutes to come in and she said she was busy, but would come back as soon as she finished, about 11:20pm, the new shift came in and I told her I had been waiting since 2:15 p.m., to be changed and she said there were 2 people she had to do and would come back. She came back at 1:00 a.m. to change me. He said he reported it to S2ADON. He said he tried to tell someone before then, but they told him, they were short staffed. He said this issue was discussed with S2ADON in an email. He said the 11:00 p.m. CNA never came into his room on Friday night 03/31/2023. He said at night there is usually one CNA. He said when he had a complaint, the staff doesn't relay the message to the supervisor. He said most of the problems happen at night when no supervisors are here. Resident #R5 Review of the clinical record for Resident #R5 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, in part: Spinal Cord Injury. Review of Resident #R5's MDS with ARD of 02/08/2023, revealed resident had a BIMS of 15, indicating resident was cognitively intact. On 04/03/2023 at 9:40 a.m., an interview was conducted with S9LPN. She stated she knew the CNAs were overwhelmed and work past their normal shift. On 04/03/2023 at 3:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S10LPN. She stated it was impossible for 1-2 CNAs to perform care on an entire hall of residents. She stated however, she did know of multiple shifts where there were only 1 CNA working the 3-11 p.m. shift. On 04/03/2023 at 3:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with S18CNA. She stated the facility is very short staffed. She stated for example, on 04/04/2023 during the 3-11 p.m. shift, there were only 2 CNAs on (Hall a), which has 43 residents. She stated there were no way 2 CNAs, and often there were only 1 CNA at night, could perform the proper needed care on that many residents. She stated administration is not disciplining CNAs if an issue or incident occurs in fear that they would lose the few staff members they have. She stated this created an environment where CNAs feel they can do as little or whatever they feel like doing because they know they would not get in trouble. She stated if a CNA called in or just did not show up to work, administration would not have a CNA to fill that spot. She stated they would just go without. On 04/04/2023 at 5:40 a.m., an observation was made of the facility. There were only 3 CNAs working the night shift. 1 CNA was working Hall a (S16CNA) and 2 CNAs (S11CNA and S12CNA) were working Hall b. On 04/04/2023 at 5:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She said she had been here for a year and worked the night shift. She said she worked Hall b. She said there are 4 nurses at night. She said there is supposed to be 5 CNAs at night but tonight there were only 3, 2 CNAs on (Hall b) and 1 CNA on (Hall a). She said there were not enough staff to take care of the residents how they should be taken care of. She said last week they only had 1 CNA for each hall. She said the facility does use agency staff, but administration is the only one that can call the agency for staff. On 04/04/2023 at 5:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with F6LPN. She said there were not enough staff in the building to take care of the residents. She said she only had 1 CNA tonight. On 4/04/2023 at 6:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S16CNA. She said last night they had 3 CNAs in the building and she was the only one on (Hall a) and they had a code. She said she worked 5-6 nights a week. She said she was orientated with a CNA, but it wasn't much. She said she never had enough time to take care of her residents and they are not getting the care they need. She said she never knew if a resident's condition changes because no one gives report to her. She stated the residents can be having problems and she reported it to the nurse and she never checked on them. She said she had to go get another nurse off a hall to come check on a few of her residents. She said management had never asked her about the staffing issue. She said she tried to call someone in management the other night to tell them she couldn't take care of the resident's needs and was overwhelmed, but they didn't answer. She said she left a message and sent a text and never heard from them. She said she was scared because she knew this was not the proper care for the residents. She said there is supposed to be 6 CNAs at night. She said some nights they have 4 CNAs, 3 CNAs, 2 CNAs, and 1 CNA for the entire building. On 04/04/2023 at 7:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with S11CNA. She said she worked the 11p.m. to 7a.m. shift. She said she was responsible for a lot of residents on the hall. She said it is usually 1 or 2 CNAs on Hall b. She said she doesn't have enough time to give the residents the care they need. She said the first week she started, she would go home and cry because she felt like she couldn't get her work done. She said she does not feel like the residents are getting the care they need. She said when they try to call administration, no one will answer. She said when she comes to work, her residents are soaking wet. She said it will be 2 pads, the draw sheet and the regular sheet and they will all be soaked with rings around them. She said she has to change the entire bed. She said she's tried to call about the condition of the residents, but can never get no one. She said she never knows if a resident's condition changes because no one gives report and half the time, when she comes to work, the other shift is already gone and there is no one on the floor. She said she had never charted on a resident in this facility. She said she doesn't even know where the books are to chart things. She said she had no training on anything. She said they don't even have enough linen most nights and she will have to go to another hall to get linen. She said the call lights will go off and the nurses won't answer them. On 04/04/2023 at 7:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S12CNA. She said she worked the 11p-7a shift. She said she is responsible for 22 residents at night when they are fully staffed. She said they are supposed to have 3 CNAs for (Hall a) and 3 CNAs for (Hall b). She said most nights, there is only 3 or 4 CNAs for the building. She said she doesn't have enough time to take care of the residents. She said sometimes on the weekend or at night they are short. She said she has come to work and the residents are soaking wet and she changes the whole bed. She said when she comes to work, the previous aides are gone and there is no one on the hall. She said she had never gotten report about the resident's condition before her shift. She said she had worked Hall a by herself. She said she had voiced her concerns to administration. She said a lot of nights there will only be 3, 2 or 1 CNA for the entire building. On 04/04/2023 at 10:28 a.m., an interview was conducted with S14CNA. She stated on days she couldn't come into work, she was unsure if residents received baths. She stated there were not enough CNAs working on each shift at this facility. She stated the major issues were with the 3-11 p.m. CNA shift. She stated CNAs were not being disciplined due to Administration staff not wanting to run-off what little staff they do have. She stated there were often times on the 3-11 p.m. shift where there was only 1 CNA for an entire hall. She stated it was not possible for a CNA to perform all duties safely in this way. On 04/04/2023 at 10:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #R5. He stated there were not enough CNAs on the 3-11 p.m. shift. He stated call lights cannot be answered in a timely manner, and staff cannot complete resident needs when there were not enough CNAs. He stated on days that the bath aide cannot come to work, residents did not get baths even if CNAs tell Administration the residents are receiving baths. He stated he was able to perform a lot of his needs on his own however, he knew a lot of the other residents were not capable of doing so. On 04/04/2023 at 11:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with S20RT. She stated she worked 12 hour shifts. She stated there was supposed to be 2 Respiratory Therapist working on days and 2 working on nights. She stated sometimes there would only be 1 RT working for the whole facility. On 04/04/2023 at 3:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with S15CNA. She stated there were not enough CNAs on the halls during the 3-11 p.m. shift. She stated having 1-2 CNAs on an entire hall was impossible to keep the residents safe and tasks being performed. She stated if a CNA is not available, nurses step in and clean up the residents. She stated Administration was not making sure there was enough CNAs present even if CNAs called in or just did not show up for their shift. On 04/05/2023 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1DON. She confirmed the facility was short staffed and they do not have the number of staff they need on some days to care for the residents properly. She said this was something they are working on.
Feb 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of verbal abuse were reported immediatel...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of verbal abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the administrator and to other officials in accordance with State law for 1 (#6) of 9 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #R1, #R2, and #R3) residents reviewed for abuse. Findings: A review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy revealed the following: Definitions: Verbal Abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. XII: Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator. If applicable it will be reported to state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes as noted by state agency. A review of the clinical record for Resident #6 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Quadriplegia. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/09/2022 revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. A review of the Grievance Report dated 01/22/2023 revealed Resident #6 filed a grievance at 10:30 a.m., which indicated he was treated badly by weekend staff. A review of the facility's Incident Report Log dated January 2023 revealed no entries for Resident #6. A review of the Nurse's Notes dated January 2023 revealed no entries pertaining to Resident #6 being mistreated by staff. On 01/31/2023 at 1:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with S8CNA. She stated Resident #6 told her S9CNA made verbally abusive comments to him after he filed a grievance concerning his care. She stated she could not recall the date, but Resident #6 told her S9CNA told him he was going to suffer. S8CNA stated that was verbal abuse. S8CNA stated she did not report it to anyone. On 02/01/2023 at 8:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #6. He stated in January 2023, he filed a grievance report pertaining to his care. He stated after filing the grievance, S9CNA told him he was going to suffer. He stated he was afraid of S9CNA and lost sleep at night because of what she told him. He stated S9CNA said mean things to him in the past. He stated he did not report it to administration. On 02/01/2023 at 10:41 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM. He stated he was not aware of the alleged comment made by S9CNA to Resident #6. He stated if S9CNA told Resident #6 he was going to suffer, he would consider that verbal abuse. He stated if S8CNA knew about the alleged comment, she should have reported it to him immediately. He confirmed any alleged verbal abuse should be reported to him immediately by staff members.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for three (#3, #4, #5) of six (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) residents reviewed for ADLs. Policy review titled: Activities of Daily Living(ADLs) revealed, in part: Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, grooming, and oral care. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, in part: 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Findings: Resident #3 A review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #3 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part: Spinal Cord Injury due to Motor Vehicle Accident (Driver), Chronic pain, Neurogenic Bladder, Dysarthria Following Other Non-Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage, and Dysphagia Following Other Non-Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage. A review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/11/2023 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. His functional status included, in part: total assistance with personal hygiene and bathing. A review of Resident #3's Care Plan dated 01/24/2023 revealed the following, in part: Problem: Receiving Hospice Care Interventions, in part: Coordinate with Hospice team to assure resident experiences as little pain as possible. A review of Nurse's Notes for Resident #3 revealed no documented refusals of showers/bed baths, oral care, or shaving since re-admitted on [DATE]. A review of Nurses Notes dated 01/26/2023 at 12:58 p.m. revealed, in part: Has about 1/4 to 1/2 inch beard growing, states he hopes to have it shaved off today or tomorrow, and require help with it. Signed S3RN. On 01/31/2023 at 11:00 a.m., an observation/interview was conducted with Resident #3 in his room. Heavy facial hair noted, and when resident was asked if he wanted a beard, he stated No. He denied refusing ADL care. On 01/31/2023 at 11:11 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. She stated she was familiar with Resident #3, and he was cooperative with care. She stated he received bed baths and required total assistance for ADLs. She stated any resident that refused care should be reported to the nurse by the CNA assigned. She stated A-beds got baths or showers on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, and B-beds were Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. She stated male residents should be asked if they wanted to be shaved. She stated all residents should receive oral care daily. On 01/31/2023 at 12:55p.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She stated CNAs were expected to provide Resident #3 a bed bath on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday since he was in bed B, provide oral care daily, and shave him as needed/requested. She stated Resident #3 had not refused any bed baths, oral care or shaving. She stated if a resident refused ADL care, the CNA was expected to document the refusal and notify the nurse. On 02/01/2023 at 11:25a.m., an interview was conducted with S6CNA. He stated he was familiar with Resident #3. He stated CNAs were expected to do ADL care which included dressing, bathing, brushing teeth, and incontinence care or catheter care. He stated all CNAs documented ADL care provided on the ADL Worksheets and turned them in to the ADON after each shift worked. He stated B bed residents were bathed on Tuesday-Thursday-Saturdays, and A beds on Monday/Wednesday/Fridays. He stated CNAs should brush resident's teeth that needed assistance after every meal. On 02/01/2023 at 11:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADON. She stated she expected all CNAs to report on each shift all residents they provided care for, including bed baths and showers given. She stated she was responsible for reviewing the ADL documentation for its accuracy and completeness. On 02/02/2023 at 8:45 a.m., an observation/interview was conducted with Resident #3 in his room. Heavy facial hair noted. Resident #3 stated he had not received a bed bath. On 02/02/2023 at 9:50 a.m., an interview/record review was conducted with S2ADON. She stated per the facility's bath schedule, bed baths or showers should be provided for A-beds on Monday/Wednesday/Fridays and B-beds on Tuesday/Thursday/Saturdays. A record review of CNA Worksheet records for Resident #3, dated from 01/15/2023 to 02/01/2023, revealed no supporting documentation of daily oral care or shaving provided. Further record review of Resident #3's CNA Worksheets for Bed bath/Showers revealed the following: Tuesday 01/17/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #3 (B bed) Thursday 01/19/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #3(B bed) Saturday 01/21/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #3 (B bed) Tuesday 01/24/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #3 (B bed) Thursday 01/26/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #3 (B bed) Saturday 01/28/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #3 (B bed) Tuesday 01/31/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #3 (B bed) On 02/02/2023 at 11:25 a.m., an interview/record review was conducted with S2ADON. She stated daily oral care should be provided to all residents and male residents should also be shaved as needed/requested. Results of the Record review conducted of Resident #3's CNA Worksheets, dated 01/15/2023 to 02/01/2023, was reviewed with S2ADON. S2ADON confirmed Resident #3's medical record lacked documentation he had received a shower/bath and oral care on the dates reviewed and should have. Resident #4 A review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part: Quadriplegia, Unspecified, Anemia, Unspecified, Heart Failure, Unspecified, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications, Colostomy status, and Orthostatic Hypotension. A review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/16/2023 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 indicating he was cognitively intact. His functional status included, in part: total assistance with personal hygiene and bathing. A review of Resident #4's Care Plan dated 11/03/2021 revealed the following, in part: Problem: Total dependence with ADLs; requires maximum assistance. Interventions, in part: Bathe per staff, Clean gown/clothing daily and PRN soilage, Oral hygiene per staff daily and PRN. On 01/31/2023 at 11:10a.m., an observation/interview was conducted with Resident #4 in his room. Resident observed with heavy facial hair. Resident had bilateral hand contractures noted with history of Quadriplegia. Teeth observed to be brown colored, with thick brown substance between his bottom lower teeth. He stated he had not received a bath since 1/18/23, and his teeth had not been brushed. He stated he shouldn't have to ask to get a bath. He stated he preferred to keep a goatee and shaved head, but staff had not shaved him. He stated he should not have to ask for that either. On 01/31/2023 at 11:11 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. She stated she was familiar with Resident #4, and he was cooperative with care. She stated he received bed baths, and required total assistance for ADLs. She stated any resident that refused care should be reported to the nurse by the CNA assigned. She confirmed A beds got baths Monday/Wednesday/Friday's and B beds were Tuesday-Thursday-Saturday's. She stated male residents should be asked if they wanted to be shaved. She stated all residents should receive oral care daily. On 01/31/2023 at 12:55p.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN. She stated she was familiar with Resident #4. She stated he was cooperative with care and totally dependent for ADL care. She stated CNAs were expected to provide Resident #4 a bed bath on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays since he was in bed A, provide oral care daily, and shave him as needed/requested. She stated Resident #4 had not refused any ADL care. She stated if a resident refused ADL care, the CNA was expected to document the refusal and notify the nurse. On 02/01/2023 at 8:40 a.m., an observation/interview was conducted with Resident #4 in his room. He appeared unshaven with heavy facial hair, and teeth observed to be brown with excessive buildup of brownish substance on bottom teeth. He stated he had not been bathed nor had his teeth brushed. He stated he wanted to be bathed, have his teeth brushed and be shaved. On 02/01/2023 at 11:25a.m., an interview was conducted with S6CNA. He stated he was familiar with Resident #4. He stated Resident #4 was cooperative with care. She stated he required assistance with meals and all ADLs daily which included bathing, personal hygiene, and oral care. He stated he was unaware of Resident #4 ever refusing to have a bed bath or to be shaved. He stated A beds should be bathed on Monday/Wednesday/Fridays. When asked if Resident #4 should have received a bed bath today, on Wednesday, he stated he would bathe him today. He stated CNAs should brush a resident's teeth that needed assistance after every meal. On 02/01/2023 at 11:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADON. She stated she expected all CNAs to report each shift all residents they provided care for, including bed baths/showers given. She stated she was responsible for reviewing the ADL documentation for its accuracy and completeness. On 02/02/2023 at 8:35 a.m., an observation/interview was conducted with Resident #4 in his room. Resident stated staff had not brushed his teeth, and he wanted his teeth brushed. Heavy facial hair/beard remained. Resident stated he only wanted his goatee but they should shave his face. Resident stated he had not received a bed bath yesterday on 02/01/2023. On 02/02/2023 at 9:50 a.m., S2ADON provided Resident #4's CNA Worksheets dated 01/15/2023 to 02/01/2023 as requested. A record review of Resident #4's CNA Worksheet records dated from 01/15/2023 to 02/01/2023, revealed no supporting documentation that daily oral care or shaving had been provided. A record review of Resident #4's CNA Worksheets, dated 01/15/2023 to 02/01/2023, for Resident #4's Bed bath/Showers revealed the following: Monday 01/16/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #4 (A bed) Wednesday 01/17/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #4 (A bed) Friday 01/19/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #4(A bed) Monday 01/23/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #4 (A bed) Monday 01/30/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #4 (A bed) On 02/02/2023 at 11:25 a.m., an interview/record review was conducted with S2ADON. She confirmed bed bath or showers were expected to be performed on Monday/Wednesday/Fridays for A-bed residents and Tuesday/Thursday/Saturdays for B-bed residents, and daily oral care should be provided to all residents. She stated male residents should also be shaved as needed/requested. After reviewing Resident #4's CNA Worksheets, dated 01/15/2023 to 02/01/2023, S2ADON confirmed Resident #4's medical record lacked documentation he had received a shower/bath and oral care daily on the dates reviewed and should have. Resident #5 A review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Arthritis, Cerebral Vascular Accident with Left Sided Weakness, Urine Retention, Neurogenic Bladder, Muscle Weakness, and Other Lack of Coordination. A review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/12/2022 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. The resident required limited-extensive assistance with personal hygiene, and total dependence with bathing. A review of Resident #5's Care Plan dated 09/17/2022 revealed the following, in part: Problem: Modified Independence with ADLs related to Cerebral Vascular Accident with Left Hemiplegia Interventions, in part: Allow resident to perform tasks at own pace, allow privacy as needed. Problem: Requires assist with ADLs Interventions, in part: Comb/brush hair, wash face, change clothing as needed to maintain proper appearance at all times, assist with dressing, grooming and bathing. Bathe 3 times weekly. On 01/31/2023 11:11 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4LPN. She stated Resident #5 was cooperative with care and was receiving skilled care currently. She stated he required some assistance with ADLs. She was unaware of the resident refusing to be bathed or shaved. On 01/31/2023 at 1:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #5. He stated he had been at this facility for 6-7 weeks and would be here long-term. He stated he had to ask for a shower, and he only received a shower once every 1-2 weeks. On 02/01/2023 at 8:45 a.m., an observation/interview was conducted with Resident #5 in his room. Resident stated he had not had a bath or shower. He stated he would like a shower. On 02/01/2023 11:02 a.m., an interview was conducted with S7CNA. He stated he was not familiar with Resident #5. He stated he provided ADL care to residents on his assigned hall, which included helping them dress, brushing their teeth, turning them every 2 hours, and bathing. He stated he bathed all residents unless female residents declined to be bathed by a male CNA. He stated if that occurred, he would get a female CNA to assist them. He stated he was expected to document ADL care, such as bathing/ meal intakes daily, and leave the ADL sheets at the nurses' station for S2ADON to review daily. On 02/01/2023 at 11:25a.m., an interview was conducted with S6CNA. He stated he was not familiar with Resident #5. He stated the CNAs were expected to do ADL care and they documented on an ADL sheet that was turned in to S2ADON daily. He stated the CNAs should brush residents' teeth that needed assistance after every meal. On 02/02/2023 at 8:38 a.m., an observation/interview was conducted with Resident #5 in his room. Resident had not been dressed at this time, and he stated he had not received a shower today. On 02/02/2023 at 11:25 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADON. She confirmed bed bath or showers were expected to be performed on Monday/Wednesday/Fridays for A-bed residents and Tuesday/Thursday/Saturdays for B-bed residents, and daily oral care should be provided to all residents. She stated male residents should also be shaved as needed/requested. A Record review of Resident #5's CNA worksheets dated from 01/15/2023 to 02/01/2023 revealed the following: Friday 01/20/2023- no bath/shower recorded for Resident #5 Monday 01/23/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #5 Wednesday 01/25/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #5 Friday 01/27/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #5 Monday 01/30/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #5 Wednesday 02/01/2023- no baths recorded for Resident #5 On 02/02/2023 at 12:30 p.m., S2ADON presented more documents of Resident #5's CNA Worksheets dated 01/15/2023 to 02/01/2023 and further record review was completed with S2ADON. S2ADON confirmed Resident #5's medical record lacked documentation he had received a shower/bath and oral care daily on the dates as reviewed and should have.
Nov 2022 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of their property by failing to implement written...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of their property by failing to implement written policies and procedures for screening and training of Agency/Contract Staff 1 (S9CNA) of 2 (S9CNA, S10CNA) sampled agency staff members. This practice had the potential to affect all Residents in the Facility. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation revealed, in part, the following: Definitions: Staff includes employees, the medical director, consultants, contractors, volunteers, caregivers who provide care and services to residents on behalf of the facility, students, in the facility's nurse aide training program, and students from affiliated academic institutions, including therapy, social and activity programs. Screening: A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background, reference, and credentials' checks shall be conducted on potential employees, contracted temporary staff, students affiliated with academic institutions, volunteers, and consultants. 2. Screenings may be conducted by the facility itself, third-party agency or academic institution. 3. The facility will maintain documentation of proof that the screening occurred. Employee Training: A. New employees will be educated on abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property during initial orientation. B. Existing staff will receive annual education through planned in-services and as needed. A review of the facility's Use of Outside Resources Policy revealed in part, the following: 2. The facility assumes responsibility for obtaining services that meet professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services. 5. Individuals/Agencies who provide individuals performing services on a contract basis will be required to adhere to State and Federal regulations governing the facility as well as to remain in compliance with their licensing board. 6. The facility will maintain written documentation of any reports as part of the services provided. A review of the facility's investigation report revealed an allegation of misappropriation of a resident's funds involving S9CNA on 08/21/2022. A review of the daily assignment sheet dated 08/21/2022 revealed S9CNA worked in the facility from the 3:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. shift on the victim's hall. On 11/30/2022 at 1:39 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADMIN. He confirmed S9CNA was accused of misappropriation of a resident's personal property on 08/21/2022. He confirmed S9CNA was assigned to care for victim on 8/21/2022. He stated S9CNA was an agency staff CNA. He confirmed the facility did not have a written policy or procedure for the screening of, ensuring competencies of, or a training program for agency/contract staff. He confirmed the facility did not keep personnel files on agency/contract staff. He also confirmed S9CNA's last day worked was on 08/21/2022. He was unable to provide a start date for S9CNA. He confirmed prior to and throughout S9CNA's employment he did not verify her criminal background check. He confirmed he requested a copy of the staffing agency's personnel file for S9CNA on 08/30/2022, which was nine days after her last day worked. He further confirmed he never reviewed the personnel file after receiving it. He was unable to confirm S9CNA's competency for the required in-services/trainings on abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of funds. He confirmed abuse, neglect, exploitation, nor misappropriation of funds trainings/in-services were provided by the facility to S9CNA due to her being an agency/contract staff.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented interventions to prevent or reduce the r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of accidents for 1 (#3) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Incidents and Accidents revealed, in part: Policy Explanation: This purpose of incident reporting can include: Assuring that appropriate and immediate interventions are implemented and corrective actions are taken to prevent recurrences and improve the management of resident care. Review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Dementia, Lumbago with Sciatica, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Parkinson's, and Disorientation. Review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/25/2022 revealed Resident #3 had a BIMS of 3, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the current Care Plan for Resident #3 revealed the following, in part: Problem: At risk for falls related to Parkinson's, lack of safety awareness, and, compulsive behavior. 10/10/2022 Resident #3 found on floor by wheelchair Intervention: Place in Geri-chair when resident is out of bed. 10/22/2022 Resident #3 found lying on left side on floor in room by wheelchair Interventions: Place resident at nurse's desk for meals Review of the facility's Incident Reports for Resident #3 revealed the following, in part: Incident Type- Unwitnessed Fall Date 10/10/2022 Type of Injury- Skin tear noted on left wrist. Complaints of pain to right hip and right wrist. Location- Resident's Bedroom Narrative of incident and description of injuries: Nurse was in another room next to Resident #3's room when she heard loud noise. Nurse went into room, Resident #3 on the floor by his wheelchair. NP ordered resident to go to ER since unwitnessed fall. Hospital Records: No injuries noted Incident Type- Unwitnessed Fall Date 10/22/2022 Type of Injury- Resident stated his head hurt Location- Resident's Bedroom Narrative of incident and description of injuries: Resident #3 was sitting up in his wheelchair for dinner. S5LPN walked by Resident #3's room, and noticed resident laying on the floor left side. Resident able to move all extremities. Resident stated head hurt. Hospital Records: No injuries noted. An interview was conducted on 11/29/2022 at 12:43 p.m. with S4ADON. She verified Resident #3 fell on [DATE], and the intervention to place the resident in a Geri-chair when he was out of bed was put into place. She stated on 10/22/2022 the resident fell again from his wheelchair. She confirmed this resident should have been in a Geri-chair per his care plan interventions. She confirmed this could have prevented Resident #3 from falling and hitting his head. A phone interview was conducted on 11/30/2022 at 11:23 a.m. with S5LPN. She stated she did not recall the incident specifically, but if her notes from 10/22/2022 stated Resident #3 fell out of his wheelchair, then that's what happened. She confirmed he should have been in a Geri-chair at that time, and not his wheelchair.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented as e...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented as evidenced by not documenting medications administered for 1(#4) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents' records reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 91 residents who resided in the facility as documented on the facility's Resident Census. Findings: Review of the facility's policy Medication Administration revealed the following, in part: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 13. Administer medication as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications. 15. Sign MAR after administered. For those medications requiring vital signs, record the vital signs onto the MAR. 16. If medication is a controlled substance, sign narcotic book. Resident #4: A review of the Medical Record revealed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Non-Displaced Proximal Left Humerus Fracture, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, Cerebral Vascular Accident with Left Hemiparesis. A review of the current Physician's Orders revealed the following: 10/14/2022 -Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325mg take 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. A review of the Facility's Nurse Drug Count Form dated October and November 2022 for Resident #4 revealed the following dates one dose of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5mg/325mg tablet was removed for administration: 10/18/2022 8:00 p.m. dose given 10/19/2022 2:00 p.m. dose given 10/20/2022 12:00 p.m. dose given 10/22/2022 2:30 a.m. dose given 10/22/2022 2:00 p.m. dose given 10/22/2022 10:00 p.m. dose given 10/24/2022 9:00 a.m. dose given 10/24/2022 5:00 p.m. dose given 10/24/2022 8:00 p.m. dose given 10/25/2022: 9:00 a.m. dose given 10/26/2022: 11:00p.m. dose given 10/27/2022: 9:00 a.m. dose given 10/28/2022: 2:00 p.m. dose given 10/28/2022: 10:00 p.m. dose given 10/29/2022: 4:00 a.m. dose given 10/29/2022: 10:00 a.m. dose given 10/29/2022: 5:00 p.m. dose given 10/29/2022: 11:00 p.m. dose given 10/30/2022: 6:00 a.m. dose given 10/30/2022: 5:00 p.m. dose given 10/30/2022: 10:00 p.m. dose given 11/01/2022: 5:00 p.m. dose given 11/01/2022: 9:00 p.m. dose given 11/02/2022: 11:00 a.m. dose given 11/02/2022: 9:00 p.m. dose given 11/03/2022: 9:00 a.m. dose given 11/05/2022: 9:00 a.m. dose given 11/05/2022: 5:00 p.m. dose given 11/05/2022: 11:00 p.m. dose given 11/06/2022: 9:00 a.m. dose given 11/06/2022: 5:00 p.m. dose given 11/06/2022: 11:00 p.m. dose given 11/07/2022: 12:00 p.m. dose given 11/08/2022: 8:00 a.m. dose given 11/09/2022: 2:00 p.m. dose given 11/13/2022: 5:00 p.m. dose given 11/13/2022: 11:00 p.m. dose given 11/15/2022: 2:00 p.m. dose given 11/15/2022: 8:00 p.m. dose given 11/17/2022: 9:00 a.m. dose given 11/17/2022: 6:00 p.m. dose given 11/19/2022: 5:00 a.m. dose given 11/19/2022: 11:00 a.m. dose given 11/19/2022: 9:00 p.m. dose given 11/21/2022: 5:00 a.m. dose given 11/21/2022: 4:00 p.m. dose given 11/21/2022: 10:00 p.m. dose given 11/22/2022: 2:00 p.m. dose given 11/22/2022: 10:00 p.m. dose given 11/23/2022: 9:00 a.m. dose given 11/23/2022: 12:00 p.m. dose given 11/23/2022: 9:00 p.m. dose given 11/24/2022: 9:00 a.m. dose given 11/24/2022: 8:00 p.m. dose given 11/28/2022: 5:00 a.m. dose given 11/28/2022: 1:30 p.m. dose given 11/29/2022: 5:00 a.m. dose given 11/29/2022: 12:00 p.m. dose given 11/30/2022: 11:40 a.m. dose given Review of Resident #4's October and November 2022 MAR entries revealed the following Norco 5-325mg doses were administered on the following dates: 10/18/2022 Blank 10/19/2022 Blank 10/20/2022 Blank 10/22/2022 x 2 10/24/2022 x 1 10/25/2022 Blank 10/26/2022 x 1 10/27/2022 Blank 10/28/2022 x 1 10/29/2022 x 2 10/30/2022 x 2 11/01/2022- Blank 11/02/2022- Blank 11/03/2022- Blank 11/05/2022 x 1 11/06/2022 x 2 11/07/2022 x 2 11/08/2022 x 2 11/09/2022 x 2 11/13/2022 x 1 11/15/2022 x 1 11/17/2022 x1 11/19/2022 x 2 11/21/2022 x 1 11/22/2022 x 1 11/23/2022 x 1 11/24/2022 x 1 11/28/2022 x 1 11/29/2022-Blank 11/30/2022-Blank On 11/29/2022 at 1:30 p.m. an interview was conducted with S6LPN. She stated when a resident required pain med use, the nurse should document on the Narcotic sheet for that resident's medication when the pain med was obtained, then document on the resident's MAR immediately after the dose is given. On 11/30/2022 at 11:05 a.m. an interview was conducted with S3DON. She stated her expectation of nursing staff was to document any administered narcotics on the resident's MAR when the medication was administered. On 11/30/2022 at 11:15 a.m. an interview was conducted with S4ADON. She reviewed the Nurses Drug Count Sheet and the Medication Administration Record for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 mg dated October and November 2022 for Resident #4. She confirmed the above date entries for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325mg tablet (Norco) administration should have been documented on Resident #4's October and November 2022 MAR's and were not.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 6 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, 1 harm violation(s), $577,803 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 50 deficiencies on record, including 6 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $577,803 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Louisiana. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility is on CMS's Special Focus list for poor performance. Consider alternatives strongly.

About This Facility

What is Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab's CMS Rating?

Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab does not currently have a CMS star rating on record.

How is Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab Staffed?

Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 86%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 50 deficiencies at Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab during 2022 to 2025. These included: 6 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 42 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab?

Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by VOLARE HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 110 certified beds and approximately 67 residents (about 61% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Slidell, Louisiana.

How Does Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab's staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 0-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab Stick Around?

Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for Louisiana nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab Ever Fined?

Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab has been fined $577,803 across 4 penalty actions. This is 14.9x the Louisiana average of $38,857. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

Lakeshore Manor Nursing & Rehab is currently on the Special Focus Facility (SFF) watch list. This federal program identifies the roughly 1% of nursing homes nationally with the most serious and persistent quality problems. SFF facilities receive inspections roughly twice as often as typical nursing homes. Factors in this facility's record include 6 Immediate Jeopardy findings and $577,803 in federal fines. Facilities that fail to improve face escalating consequences, potentially including termination from Medicare and Medicaid. Families considering this facility should ask for documentation of recent improvements and what specific changes have been made since the designation.