GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC

410 SOUTH SIMMONS STREET, WELSH, LA 70591 (337) 734-2555
For profit - Limited Liability company 114 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
65/100
#36 of 264 in LA
Last Inspection: July 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Golden Age of Welsh, LLC has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average, though not outstanding. It ranks #36 out of 264 nursing homes in Louisiana, placing it in the top half, and is #3 out of 4 in Jefferson Davis County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility is improving, having reduced its number of issues from 7 in 2024 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is rated average with a turnover rate of 52%, which is comparable to the state average. However, the facility has accrued $43,368 in fines, which suggests some compliance challenges. Despite these concerns, there are notable strengths, such as good overall and health inspection ratings at 4 out of 5. Unfortunately, there have been specific issues, including a serious incident where a resident did not receive necessary pain management, leading to actual harm. Additionally, the facility has struggled to promptly address resident grievances and failed to accurately reflect medication use in assessments for some residents. These weaknesses indicate areas that need attention, even as the facility shows potential for improvement.

Trust Score
C+
65/100
In Louisiana
#36/264
Top 13%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$43,368 in fines. Higher than 62% of Louisiana facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 18 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Louisiana. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 52%

Near Louisiana avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $43,368

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Jul 2024 7 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 (#16) out of 5 (#15, #16, #22, #40, and #44) sampled residents receiving pain medication. The facility failed to: 1. provide pain medication upon complaints of pain nor offer non-pharmacologic interventions; and 2. follow up with the physician and/or pharmacy after the physician reported he was sending a pain medication order to the pharmacy. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for Resident #16 beginning on 07/14/2024 at 10:02 a.m. when the resident reported she was in pain was not provided any medication nor offered non-pharmacological interventions for pain relief. On 07/15/2024, S6LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) called S15DR to report the resident's pain and stated that he would send something to the pharmacy as soon as possible, however, no order was received by the pharmacy. On 07/16/2024 at 10:37 a.m., Resident #16 refused Physical Therapy because of continued pain and was not provided any pain relieving medication nor offered non-pharmacological interventions. On 07/17/2024 at 9:08 a.m., Resident #16 stated I am tired of hurting and the doctor still hasn't sent anything stronger than Tylenol to help with my back pain. The resident was sent to the ER (Emergency Room) on 07/17/2024 at 9:41 a.m. for low back pain. Findings: On 07/17/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Pain Management with a last reviewed date of 01/2024 read in part, Policy: The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: The facility will utilize a systematic approach for recognition, assessment, treatment and monitoring of pain. Recognition: 1. In order to help a resident attain or maintain his/her highest practicable level of physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and to prevent or manage pain, the facility will: . c. Manage or prevent pain . 2. Facility staff will observe for nonverbal indicators which may indicate the presence of pain. These indicators include but are not limited to: . d. Facial expressions (e.g. grimacing .) Pain Management and Treatment: 1. Based upon evaluation, the facility in collaboration with the attending physician/prescriber . prevent or manage each individual resident's pain . 6. Non-pharmacological interventions . 7. H. Facility will notify the practitioner, if the resident's pain is not controlled by the current treatment regimen . Review of Resident #16's health record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Pain, Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy, Transient Cerebral Ischemic Attack, Neurologic Neglect Syndrome and Chronic Pain Due To Trauma. Review of Resident #16's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating her cognition was intact. Section J Health Conditions: A. Received scheduled pain medication regimen? Coded 0. No. Review of Resident #16's physician's orders revealed an order dated 07/10/2024 that read in part, . PT (Physical Therapy) to tx (treat) 3 times a week for 8 weeks . Further review of orders revealed an order dated 04/13/2024 that read, Tylenol Extra Strength Oral Tablet 500 mg (milligram) (Acetaminophen) Give 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Review of Resident #16's comprehensive care plan with a focus that read in part, The resident has a potential for pain r/t (related to): chronic physical disability . neurologic neglect . neuropathy with a goal that read, the resident will not have an interruption in normal activities d/t (due to) pain . with interventions that read in part, administer analgesia medications as ordered/requested, anticipate the residents need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain, attempt non pharmacological pain relief techniques . document technique and effectiveness, observe and report changes in . sleep patterns Review of Resident #18's form titled Weights and Vitals Summary read in part, pain level documented on 07/14/2024 at 10:02 a.m. was rated a 5 out of 10 (pain scale from rated from 1-10 with 1 being the least and 10 being the most), further review revealed a pain level documented on 07/16/2024 at 10:37 a.m. was rated a 5 out of 10. Review of Resident #18's MAR (Medication Administration Record) from July 2024 failed to reveal administration of Tylenol Extra Strength Oral Tablet 500 mg on 07/14/2024 at 10:02 a.m. for pain rated 5 out of 10, and before this she was last given Tylenol on 07/13/2024 at 7:20 p.m. On 07/16/2024 at 10:37 a.m. when the resident reported pain rated 5 out 10 Tylenol was not administered, and before this was last given Tylenol on 07/15/2024 at 4:10 a.m. Review of Resident #18's progress notes failed to reveal non-pharmacological interventions were provided on 07/14/2024 at 10:02 a.m. and 07/16/2024 at 10:37 a.m. when the resident reported pain. On 07/15/2024 9:48 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #16. She was lying sideways on the bed and facial grimacing was noted. Upon interview, she complained of pain rated as a 10 out of 10 to left sided sciatica radiating down her left leg. She stated she has been feeling this pain since last week and all that she has received from nursing was Prednisone (steroid). She stated that she has notified nursing staff that the Prednisone is not working and she needs something else to help with her pain. She stated she had not received anything else to help with her pain. Review of progress note by S6LPN dated 07/15/2024 at 4:25 p.m. read, S6LPN spoke to S15DR's (Physician) nurse. S15DR's nurse stated that she sent a note to S15DR concerning resident's back pain. S15DR stated he would be sending something to the pharmacy ASAP (as soon as possible). Don't go to hospital until she tries what S15DR is sending. Further review of progress notes failed to reveal any documentation that S6LPN nor any other facility staff followed-up with the pharmacy or S15DR when no new pain medication was received for Resident #16. On 07/17/2024 at 8:55 a.m., a follow-up observation was made of Resident #16. She was lying sideways on the bed with facial grimacing noted. On 07/17/2024 8:55 a.m., a second interview with Resident #16. She rated her pain as a 10 out of 10 (worst pain possible) to the left side of the back down her left leg stating it was sciatica pain. She stated she has been having this pain for over 1 week now. She stated she received Prednisone during the day and Tylenol at times but none of these medications have worked. She stated she notified nursing staff that the medications were not working. She further stated I've been begging for something for pain. Review of progress note by S10LPN dated 7/17/1024 at 9:08 a.m. read, Called to room by resident, states I am tired of hurting and the doctor still hasn't sent anything stronger than Tylenol to help with my back pain. Pain 6/10. Refused any pain medication intervention at this time .(ambulance) called for transportation .09:30 a.m. transported to (hospital) in stable condition. Review of Resident #16's form titled Transfer Form dated 07/17/2024 completed by S10LPN read in part, . reason for transfer: Resident . going to hospital ER (Emergency Room) for low back pain . On 07/17/24 at 9:19 a.m. an interview was conducted with S10LPN. S10LPN stated resident has been in pain for about 1 week now. She stated the resident went to S15DR's for a rash and back pain on 07/09/2024 she was told by S15DR it was sciatica pain and to take OTC (over the counter) medication such as Tylenol. S10LPN stated communication was sent to S15DR about resident requesting something else for pain besides Tylenol on 07/13/2024 at around 10:15 a.m., but she was unable to provide any documented evidence of that communication. S10LPN confirmed she did not follow up with S15DR about prescribing the resident something else for pain after she communicated with him on 07/13/2024. S10LPN stated she worked again on 07/14/2024. On 07/14/2024 she had not heard back from S15DR about Resident #16's request to prescribe something else for pain nor did she attempt to call S15DR again. She confirmed she could have followed up with S16MD (Medical Director) of Resident #16's request for stronger pain medication. S10LPN stated based off her documentation in the EHR (Electronic Health Record) the resident reported 5 out of 10 on 07/14/2024 and she did not administer Tylenol as ordered to her on that shift and she stated she did not offer Resident #16 Tylenol. Four attempts were made to contact S6LPN via phone on 07/17/2024 at 10:17 a.m., 10:36 a.m., 11:40 a.m., and 2:47 p.m. S6LPN failed to return any phone calls and was unable to be interviewed. Four attempts were made to contact S13LPN on 07/17/2024 at 10:21 a.m., 12:10 p.m., 1:21 p.m., and 2:46 p.m. S13LPN failed to return any phone calls and was unable to be interviewed. On 07/17/2024 at 11:42 a.m. an interview was conducted with S12LPN. S12LPN confirmed that Resident #16 was in pain last night and was given Tylenol. She stated Resident #16 didn't sleep well last night and slept off and on. S12LPN confirmed the resident had been complaining of sciatica pain since last week. She stated she had not reached out to S15DR regarding the resident's pain because other staff had already. She stated she had not received any other updates from S15DR or nursing staff in report regarding resident's pain medication. She stated she had no provided non-pharmacological pain relief interventions to the resident. On 07/17/2024 at 12:30 p.m., an interview with S19PM (Pharmacy Manager). S19PM stated he reviewed resident #16's medications from February 2024 to 07/17/2024 and there were no new orders of pain medication. On 07/17/2024 at 12:37 p.m., attempted to call S15DR (Physician) per his answering system his office is closed on Wednesday's. On 07/17/2024 3:41 p.m., an interview with S3RDON (Registered Nurse, Regional Director of Nursing). She stated On 07/09/2024 Resident #16 went to an appointment with S15DR, new orders were implemented for resident to start PT. Phone call interview was conducted at this time with S20TD (Therapy Director) and S3RDON. S20TD stated the first therapy evaluation for Resident #16 was done on 07/10/2024. S20TD stated Resident #16 was unable to participate in therapy on 07/16/2024 due to her verbalizing that she could not get out of bed due to pain. He communicated to S6LPN that resident refused therapy due to pain. The resident's documented pain levels were then reviewed with S3RDON. She confirmed on 07/14/2024 at 10:02 a.m. and 07/16/2024 at 10:37 a.m. Resident #16 rated her pain at a 5 out of 10 and no Tylenol was administered and non-pharmacological interventions were not done nor documented. S3RDON then reviewed S6LPN's progress note dated 07/15/2024 that stated she had called S15DR regarding the resident's request for more effective pain medication. S3RDON confirmed that there was no follow up completed by the nurse. S3RDON confirmed that the staff should have followed up regarding Resident #16's pain with S15DR or S16MD on 07/15/2024 and 07/16/2024 and staff did not. She confirmed Resident #16 was sent to the emergency room today due to her pain. Review of Discharge Hospital Records dated 07/17/2024 read in part, . diagnosis hip pain bilateral, sciatica of right side, neuropathy. Medications given: Decadron, Demerol, and Phenergan. Start taking: Flexeril (muscle relaxant) and Tramadol (opioid analgesic). Resident #16 returned to the facility on [DATE] at 03:11 p.m.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0565 (Tag F0565)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident rights by not acting promptly upon resident grievances received during monthly resident council meetings an...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident rights by not acting promptly upon resident grievances received during monthly resident council meetings and failed to demonstrate the facility's response for such grievances. Findings: On 07/17/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Resident and Family Grievances with a last reviewed date of 01/2024 read in part, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 8. Grievances may be voiced in following forums: . d. complaint during resident or family council meetings . 10. Procedure: . d. The grievance official will take steps to resolve the grievance, and report information about the grievance, and those actions on the grievance form . e. The grievance official, or designee, will keep the resident appropriately appraised of progress towards resolution of the grievances . A review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes was conducted and revealed notes by (Activity Director) for April 2024 - July 2024 with the different complaints voiced by the residents. However there was no evidence that the complaints were reviewed and initiated nor that attempts were made to resolve the voiced grievances. A review of the facility's grievance logs from April 2024 - July 2024 failed to include the complaints addressed during the monthly Resident Council Meeting Minutes. Resident #11 was identified in the complaints on the Resident Council Meeting Minutes. Review of Resident #11's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/11/2024 revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating her cognition was intact. On 07/15/2024 at 1:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #11 who reported she attended monthly Resident Council meetings regularly. Resident #11 reported S5AD (Activity Director) was present at the meetings and was responsible for documenting the voiced complaints. Resident #11 also reported residents were not being notified of any follow ups or resolutions regarding their complaints. On 07/15/2024 at 1:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5AD. S5AD confirmed she was the designated staff who sat in on the monthly Resident Council meetings. A review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes from April 2024 - July 2024 was reviewed with S5AD and she explained she had given a copy of all complaints voiced to the administrative staff during the daily morning huddle meetings. S5AD confirmed that grievances voiced in the resident council meetings were not filed nor included with the other facility grievances. On 07/17/2024 at 8:22 a.m., an interview was conducted with S4SSD (Social Service Director). She stated that her responsibility at the facility was to file grievances and complete investigations which included the efforts made by the facility to resolve the filed grievances. She verified that she received the resident council meeting minutes during the daily morning huddle meetings. S4SSD reviewed the resident council meeting minutes and confirmed there was documentation of the grievances voiced by the residents. S4SSD further confirmed that she should have started a Resident Council Meeting Minutes grievance for the complaints from April 2024 - July 2024 and she did not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status by...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status by failing to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for medications received for 1 (#44) of 38 residents reviewed in the initial pool. Findings: Review of Resident #44's electronic health record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Morbid Obesity, Bipolar Disorder, and Spondylosis with Radiculopathy. A review of the Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/31/2023 for Resident #44 revealed, Section N: Medications received failed to include opioid use. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2024 revealed the resident received an opioid for the entire month. On 07/17/2024 at 10:00 a.m., a concurrent record review and interview was conducted with S14RN (Registered Nurse). S14RN reviewed Resident #44's May 2024 MAR and confirmed she received an opioid for the whole month of May 2024. S14RN then viewed Resident #44's quarterly assessment for 05/31/2024 and confirmed that the resident was coded inaccurately for opioid use.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 ( #10) of 4 (#10, #54, #63, #61) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 38 residents. Findings: Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Further review of Resident #10's records revealed no evidence that a new review or a Level II PASRR had been submitted to the appropriate state-designated authority with those psychiatric diagnoses identified on the request. On 07/16/2024 at 8:29 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3RDON. She reviewed Resident #10's Level I Pre-admission screening with completed date of 02/28/2023. S3RDON confirmed Section III #1 was answered with no diagnoses checked. S3RDON then reviewed the resident's diagnoses list and confirmed the resident had the diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Order since admit on 03/01/2023. S3RDON confirmed a request for level II should have been resubmitted indicating the resident had a diagnosis of Bipolar disorder and Major Depressive disorder. On 07/16/24 at 9:36 a.m., during an interview S4SSD reported the Notice of Medical Certification was resubmitted for continued stay on 05/30/2023, and where indicated on page 1 nothing was checked that indicated mental illness was known or suspected. S4SS then confirmed the resident had both qualifying diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. She confirmed those diagnoses should have been identified on the continued stay form when it was submitted but were not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan for 1 (#33) out...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan for 1 (#33) out of 38 final sampled residents by failing to update the care plan to reflect the resident's code status. Findings: On [DATE], a review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives with a last reviewed date of 01/2024 read in part, Policy: It is policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refused and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment to formulate an advance directive . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 7. During the care planning process, the facility will identify, clarify, and review with the resident or legal representative whether they desire to make any changes related to any advance directives. 8. Decisions regarding advance directives and treatment will be periodically reviewed as part of the comprehensive care planning process . 9. Any decisions making regarding the resident's choices will be documented in the resident's medical record . Review of Resident #33's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Heart Failure, Hypersomnia, and Traumatic Brain Injury. A review of Resident #19's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a physician's order dated [DATE] that read DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). A review of the resident's medical record revealed the form titled, Louisiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (LaPOST) signed by the physician and dated [DATE]. Section A. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) had a check mark next to DNR/Do Not Attempt Resuscitation. Further review of Section B. Medical Interventions had a check mark next to comfort focused treatment. Further review of all areas in the EHR and hard chart revealed Resident #33 was a DNR. A review of Resident # 19's care plan revealed in part in part, the resident is a Full Code. On [DATE] at 3:02 p.m., a record review and interview was conducted with S7MDS/LPN (Minimum Data Set/Licensed Practical Nurse). S7MDS/LPN confirmed the care plan read the resident was a full code. S7MDS/LPN confirmed the physician's order written on [DATE] read DNR (Do not resuscitate). S2ADON also confirmed Resident #19's record revealed the LaPOST form that indicated the resident had a DNR status with comfort focused treatment and was signed on [DATE]. She confirmed the resident's code status was not accurately documented in the resident's care plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment for 2 (#18 and #...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment for 2 (#18 and #75) out of 2 (#18 and #75) residents investigated for respiratory care. Findings: On 07/17/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration with a last reviewed date of 01/2024 read in part . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 8. Oxygen tubing is to be bagged at bedside when not is use . 10. Types of delivery systems included: . e. Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) Mask . g. Aerosol Generating Device . Resident #18 Review of Resident #18's health record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Failure, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, and Respiratory Failure. Review of Resident #18's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating her cognition was intact. Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs was checked for oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #18's physician's orders revealed an order dated 05/06/2024 that read, ensure oxygen tubing, oxygen masks, BiPAP/CPAP masks are in respiratory bags when not in use. On 07/15/2024 at 9:27 a.m., an observation was conducted in Resident #18's room. Resident #18's BiPAP mask was hanging over her recliner, not in use, open to air and not stored in a respiratory bag. On 07/15/2024 at 10:24 a.m., a second observation was conducted in Resident #18's room. Resident #18's BiPAP mask was hanging over her recliner, not in use, open to air and not stored in a respiratory bag. On 07/15/2024 at 11:30 a.m., a third observation was conducted in Resident #18's room. Resident #18's BiPAP mask was hanging over her recliner, not in use, open to air and not stored in a respiratory bag. On 07/15/2024 at 11:55 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S6LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). S6LPN confirmed that Resident #9's BiPAP mask was hanging over her recliner, not in use and open to air. She stated the resident was at doctor's appointment today and her BiPAP mask should have been stored in a respiratory bag. On 07/17/2024 at 8:41 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON/IP (Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist). S2DON confirms when BiPAP masks are not in use it should be stored in a respiratory bag. Resident #75 Findings: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility 01/05/2022 with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of Resident #75's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05/29/2024 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #75 current physician's orders read: Arformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Nebulization Solution 2 ml (milliliters), Inhale orally via nebulizer two times a day. Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 3mg/3ml (milligram/milliliter) 3 ml inhale orally via nebulizer every 4 hours as needed for wheezing/shortness of breath. Sodium Chloride Inhalation Nebulization Solution 3% 1 vial inhale orally via nebulizer two times a day. Further review of Resident #75's physician's orders revealed an order that read: Ensure oxygen tubing, oxygen masks, are in respiratory bags when not in use. On 07/15/2024 at 09:00 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #75's nebulizer mask lying open to air on his bedside table, not in a bag. On 07/15/2024 at 09:45 a.m., a second observation and interview was made with S15LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and she confirmed that the nebulizer mask was open to air and not stored properly. Also present for interview was S16CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and she confirmed that she had placed Resident #75's nebulizer mask on the bedside table and had not stored it properly.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection. The facility failed to ensure S8CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and S9CNA wore proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while proving care for 1 (#33) out of 2 (#29 and #33) sampled residents reviewed for peg tube care. Findings: On 07/17/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a last reviewed date of 04/01/2024 read in part, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms. Definitions: Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-dry resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 3. Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: . b. PPE for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high contact activities . 4. High-contact resident care activities include: . f. changing briefs . Review of Resident #33's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Gastrostomy Status, Disturbances of Salivary Secretion, and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Review of Resident #33's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was blank, indicating she was unable to participate during this assessment. Section H: Bladder and Bowel was checked for always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Section K: Swallowing/Nutritional Status was checked for feeding tube. Review of Resident #33's physician's orders revealed an order dated 04/01/2024 that read, Enhanced Barrier Precautions gown and gloves worn for high-contact care activities. On 07/16/2024 at 2:40 p.m., an observation was made of Resident's #33's name outside of her door, next to her name was a sign which stated Enhanced Barrier Precautions. On 07/16/2024 at 2:42 p.m., an observation was made of two staff members with an incontinent brief and gloves in their hands walking into Resident #33's room and closing the door behind them. They were observed with no gown in their hands nor did they don a gown before entering into Resident #33's room. There was a PPE station noted next to the resident's door stocked with gown and gloves. On 07/16/2024 at 2:56 p.m. an interview was conducted with S8CNA. S8CNA stated she went into Resident #33's room to change the resident's brief due to it being soiled. She confirmed the resident was on EBP and she did not wear gowns before providing resident care and should have. On 07/16/2024 at 2:57 p.m., an interview with S9CNA. S9CNA stated that she went into Resident #33's room to change the resident's brief due to it being soiled. She confirmed the resident was on EBP due to her peg tube. She confirmed that PPE supplies are on the outside of Resident #33's room readily available, but she did not wear a gown while proving resident care. On 07/17/2024 8:42 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON/IP (Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist). S2DON stated she was one of the IP's for the facility. She confirmed if a resident was on EBP, a gown and gloves must be donned when proving high contact activities such as changing a resident's brief.
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide annual nurse aide training of abuse, neglect and exploitation for 1 (S2ACNA) (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant) out of 1 (S2ACNA)...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide annual nurse aide training of abuse, neglect and exploitation for 1 (S2ACNA) (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant) out of 1 (S2ACNA) Agency CNA personnel record reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, read in part: Employee Training: A. New employees will be educated on abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property during initial orientation. B. Existing staff will receive annual education through planned in-services and as needed. C. Training topics will include: 1. Prohibiting and preventing all forms of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation . A review of S2CNA's personnel record revealed that he did not receive the required annual training for Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. The personnel record contained abuse, neglect policy training dated 04/02/2019, which was the last documented training. On 11/07/2023 at 12:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1OM (Office Manager). S1OM confirmed that S2ACNA had not received the required annual training for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation. On 11/07/2023 at 1:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S6DON, she confirmed S2ACNA did not have the required in-service training for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide nurse aide training of at least 12 hours a year for 1 (S2ACNA) (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant) out of 4 (S2ACNA, S3CNA [Certif...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide nurse aide training of at least 12 hours a year for 1 (S2ACNA) (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant) out of 4 (S2ACNA, S3CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant], S4CNA, S5CNA) CNAs whose personnel records were reviewed. Findings: A review of S2CNA's personnel record revealed that he did not receive the required training in Dementia Care, Behavioral Health, Communication or and Resident Rights. Further review revealed the training for Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Infection Control were dated 04/02/2019. On 11/07/2023 at 12:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1OM (Office Manager). S1OM confirmed that S2ACNA did not receive the required yearly training of at least 12 hours a year in Dementia Care, Behavioral Health, Communication, Resident Rights, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Infection Control. She also confirmed that the trainings should have been completed before S2ACNA started working at the facility.
Jun 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for use of anticoagulants for 1 (#45) of 32 sampled residents whose record...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for use of anticoagulants for 1 (#45) of 32 sampled residents whose records were reviewed. The deficient practice has the potential to affect a facility census of 89 residents. Findings: A review of resident #45's medical record revealed a Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/02/2023, read in part . Section N. Medications . indicate the number of days the resident received the following medication by pharmacological classification, not how it is used, during the last 7 days E. Anticoagulant . Coded for 7 days. Further review of resident #45's electronic medication administration record for February 2023 through March 2023, and Physician's orders from February 2023 through March of 2023 revealed no evidence of an anticoagulant being administered or ordered. On 06/06/2023, during an interview S4MDS and S5MDS nurses verified that resident #45's MDS with ARD date of 03/02/2023 was coded for receiving 7 days of an anticoagulant. They both reviewed Resident #45's electronic medical record and confirmed that Resident #45 did not receive any anticoagulants during the 7 day observation period of the MDS and stated the MDS was incorrectly coded.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (#10) of 32 sampled residents. This deficient practice was evident when facility staff failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly stored for Resident #10. The deficient practice has the potential to affect 13 residents receiving respiratory treatment out of a total census of 89 residents. Findings: On 06/06/2023 at 8:49 a.m. and on 06/07/2023 at 2:00 p.m., a request was made for S2DON (Director of Nursing) to provide the facility's policy regarding storage of resident's respiratory equipment. By time of exit on 06/07/2023, the facility failed to provide requested policy. Review of Resident #10's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, and Dyspnea. Review of the resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 indicating his cognition was moderately impaired. Section O-Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs revealed the resident required use of BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) non-invasive mechanical ventilator while a resident. Review of resident's comprehensive care plan revealed on 03/31/2023 resident at risk for SOB (shortness of breath) while lying flat with intervention to wear BiPAP per MD (doctor of medicine) orders. Review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an order entry dated 03/31/2023 BiPAP to be worn at bed time and when napping. Observation on 06/05/2023 at 7:45 a.m., revealed Resident #10's BiPAP mask was next to his bed on a side table, not stored in a plastic bag and open to air. A follow up observation on 06/06/2023 at 8:46 a.m., revealed Resident #10's BiPAP mask was next to his bed on a side table, not stored in a plastic bag and open to air. On 06/06/2023 at 8:49 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON who confirmed that when a resident's BiPAP mask was not in use, the mask must be stored in a bag. On 06/06/2023 at 9:00 a.m., an interview and observation was conducted with S3ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) who observed Resident #10's BiPAP next to his bed on a side table, not stored in a plastic bag and open to air. S3ADON confirmed the BiPAP mask was not stored in a bag and open to air.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain proper labeling and storage of all medications as evidenced by loose unlabeled pills found in a drawer in 1 (Medication Cart B) of 2...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain proper labeling and storage of all medications as evidenced by loose unlabeled pills found in a drawer in 1 (Medication Cart B) of 2 medication carts (B and C) reviewed. This had the potential to affect a census of 89 residents. Findings: Review of the providers Medication Storage Policy read in part .All medications housed on our premises will be stored sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, light, moisture control, segregation, and security. On 06/07/2023 at 8:10 a.m., an observation of Medication Cart B conducted with S6LPN revealed two loose tablet pills at the bottom of the cart's second medication drawer. There was one orange colored round pill and one white round pill. S6LPN nor surveyor were able to see any visible markings to identify them nor access them from that position in the drawer. S6LPN confirmed the nurses are required to either administer or discard all medications that are popped out of their blister packs and should never leave loose medication in the carts. On 06/07/2023 at 09:25 a.m., S2DON confirmed that pills should not be loose in the bottom of the medication cart drawer.
Apr 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident R1 Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Dysphagia Following Cerebra...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident R1 Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Dysphagia Following Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Without Esophagitis and Unspecified Osteoarthritis. On 04/24/2023 at 12:15 p.m., an observation was made of Resident R1 laying in her bed watching television. Upon entering the room, an observation was made of a clear plastic bottle labeled Tums Chewables that was located on the resident's bedside table. The bottle was observed with half of the chewables in it and the resident stated one of her children brought that to her a while back because she sometimes has reflux after eating. Further observation of the resident's room revealed Icy Hot 1.5 ounce bottle located on the night stand drawer to the left of the resident's bed. On 04/24/2023 at 12:32 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing) who reported residents were able to self- administer medications when one of the nurses completed an assessment that identified a resident as safe to self- administer. S2DON stated there were currently no residents in the facility who self- administer medications. S2DON accompanied surveyor to Resident R1's room and confirmed the presence of the Tums and Icy Hot bottles in the room. S2DON confirmed Resident R1 was not assessed to self-administer her medications and the medications should not have been left at the resident's bedside. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess 3 (#5, R1 and R3) out of a total of 13 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7 and R8) sampled residents for self-administration of medication. The right to self-administer medications is the responsibility of the interdisciplinary team to assess and determine that this practice is clinically appropriate. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Self-Administration of Medications revealed in part, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so .9. Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration are turned over to the nurse in charge for return to the family or responsible party. Families are informed at admission to not bring medications into the facility . Resident #5 Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Major depressive disorder, Metabolic encephalopathy, Dysphagia, and Gastro esophageal reflux disease. On 04/24/2023 at 11:15 a.m., an observation of Resident #5's room was conducted. Upon approaching the room, the resident's rolling table was observed with 3 small clear medication cups lined up in a row. The first clear cup contained a white colored pudding and small pieces of medication could be seen mixed within the pudding. The second clear cup contained a pale pink colored liquid, and the third clear cup contained a darker colored pink liquid. An immediate interview was conducted with the resident, who confirmed that the three clear cups on his rolling table were his noon medications. The resident stated the nurse left them there for him to take. On 04/24/2023 at 11:17 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S3ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) who confirmed that the nurse should not have left the resident's medication on the rolling table. She also confirmed that the resident did not have a self-administered medication assessment. On 04/24/2023 at 12:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S5LPN (License Practical Nurse) who stated that she left the resident's medications on the bedside table because she was talking with the resident about watermelon, and while she was talking she stepped out of the room for something and then got distracted by another staff member who needed her assistance. S5LPN confirmed that she should not have left the medication at Resident #5's bedside.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy and procedure was followed. The f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy and procedure was followed. The facility failed to initiate grievances that were voiced for 2 (#2 and #4) out of 8 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, R1, R2, & R3) sampled residents. The facility census was 90. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Grievance/Complaint Procedures read in part . A resident, his or her representative (sponsor), family member, visitor or advocate may file a verbal or written grievance or complaint concerning treatment, abuse, neglect, harassment, medical care, behavior of other residents .1. Obtain a Resident Grievance Complaint Form. 2. Answer all questions on the forms . 4. Give the completed form to the SSD or his/her designee .5. Within 5 working days of the date you filed the grievance, a written summary of the results of the investigation will be available .7. It is the policy of this facility to assist you in filing a grievance or complaint . Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part: Unspecified Dementia Moderate with Anxiety, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Major Depressive Disorder and Recurrent Severe with Psychotic Symptoms. Review of facility's Grievance Logs from November 2022 to April 2023 revealed no grievance was filed for Resident #2. On 04/25/2023 at 3:42 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing) who stated Resident #2's family had voiced concerns about care and services. S2DON confirmed there was no documentation completed for addressing the concerns voiced by Resident #2's family. On 04/25/2023 at 5:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ADM (Administrator). S1ADM confirmed he had multiple meetings with Resident #2's family but had not documented the family's voiced concerns. Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses in part: Other Sequalae of Cerebral Infarction, Abnormal Posture, Difficulty in Walking, Other lack of Coordination, Muscle Weakness, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Diverticulosis of intestine without perforation or abscess with bleeding. Review of Resident #4's April 2023 Progress Notes revealed a late entry on 04/13/2023 at 10:52 a.m. by S3ADON: Resident's family members entered facility stating if they didn't speak to someone right now they will be calling state and an attorney immediately. Facility had not received any calls from family prior to arrival. Meeting held with S7SSD (Social Services Director) and S10MDS (Minimum Data Set Licensed Practical Nurse). Family members stated they are very unhappy with facility regarding the care mother has been receiving and she HAS HAD ENOUGH! States that her mother informed them both of some bruising to her arms and chest area and is questioning why neither of them were ever called and informed of this . Review of facility's Grievance Logs from November 2022 to April 2023 revealed no grievance was filed for Resident #4. On 04/25/2023 at 8:40 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON, and S3ADON. S2DON confirmed that a meeting was held on 04/13/2023 with the resident's family members and staff members S3ADON, S7SSD, S10MDS and S11CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). S3ADON stated that the resident's family members voiced they were very angry about not being informed of their mother's care. On 04/25/2023 at 1:06 p.m., an interview and review of grievance policy was conducted with S7SSD. She confirmed Resident #2 and #4's names were not on the grievance list because she did not file any grievance for them. S7SSD confirmed that a grievance should have been filed after Resident #2 and #4's family voiced their concerns.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0806 (Tag F0806)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor and accommodate food preferences for 1 (#R4) out of 1 residents reviewed for food. Findings: On 04/25/2023 at 11:39 a.m...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor and accommodate food preferences for 1 (#R4) out of 1 residents reviewed for food. Findings: On 04/25/2023 at 11:39 a.m., an interview was conducted with #R4. She stated that she was enjoying her lunch but that she did not like mashed potatoes. On 04/25/2023 at 11:40 a.m., an observation of #R4's meal tray was conducted. She was served finely chopped hamburger steak, green peas, bread with a brown gravy on top, mashed potato with gravy. A review of #R4's meal ticket revealed that she disliked mashed potatoes. On 04/25/2023 at 11:45 a.m., an interview and observation was conducted with S6DM (Dietary Manager). S6DM stated that the kitchen staff on the serving line should not only serve a resident the correct meal but they should also make sure they honor the residents' likes and dislikes. At that time, an observation was conducted with S6DM of #R4's meal ticket and meal tray. S6DM confirmed that the resident was served mashed potatoes and her meal ticket indicated that one of her dislikes was mashed potatoes. S6DM confirmed that according to #R4's meal ticket, she should not have been served mashed potatoes.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 harm violation(s), $43,368 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 15 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $43,368 in fines. Higher than 94% of Louisiana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 65/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Louisiana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc Staffed?

CMS rates GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Louisiana average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc?

State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc?

GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 114 certified beds and approximately 85 residents (about 75% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WELSH, Louisiana.

How Does Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc Compare to Other Louisiana Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Louisiana, GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.4, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Louisiana. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc Stick Around?

GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Louisiana average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc Ever Fined?

GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC has been fined $43,368 across 1 penalty action. The Louisiana average is $33,513. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Golden Age Of Welsh, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?

GOLDEN AGE OF WELSH, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.