PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD

1142 MAIN ST, SANFORD, ME 04073 (207) 324-2273
For profit - Corporation 86 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
80/100
#32 of 77 in ME
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Pinnacle Health & Rehab at Sanford has received a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for potential residents. It ranks #32 out of 77 nursing homes in Maine, placing it in the top half, and #5 out of 9 facilities in York County, meaning only four local options are better. However, the facility's trend is concerning as it has worsened from three issues in 2024 to four in 2025, indicating a decline in quality. While staffing is a strength with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 37%, which is lower than the state average, there is less RN coverage compared to 77% of Maine facilities, which raises concerns about care quality. Notably, recent inspector findings revealed that some residents did not have adequate care plans for their daily living activities, and there were issues with the documentation of controlled substances, highlighting areas needing improvement alongside the facility's generally good reputation.

Trust Score
B+
80/100
In Maine
#32/77
Top 41%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
3 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
37% turnover. Near Maine's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Maine facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Maine. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 3 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (37%)

    11 points below Maine average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 37%

Near Maine avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record

Feb 2025 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure vaccines were stored in a refrigerator without a freezer compartment for 1 of 3 medi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure vaccines were stored in a refrigerator without a freezer compartment for 1 of 3 medication storage refrigerators. Finding: A review of the United States (U.S.) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Vaccine Storage and Handling Toolkit dated 3/24/24 stated .Do not store any vaccine in a dormitory-style or bar-style combined refrigerator/freezer unit under any circumstances. On 2/11/25 at 4:00 p.m., during an observation of the First Floor Unit's Medication Room, a surveyor observed a dormitory style refrigerator (small combination refrigerator/freezer unit that is outfitted with one exterior door). The refrigerator contained several vials of purified protein derivative (for tuberculosis testing), and unit dose syringes of pneumococcal and influenza vaccines. On 2/11/25 at 4:20 p.m., the finding was confirmed by the charge nurse and the Infection Preventionist. On 2/12/25 at 10:15 a.m., the finding was discussed with the Administrator.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

5. Review of Resident #26's current ADL self-care performance deficit care plan lacked interventions which included the assistance needed for him/her in the area of personal hygiene, lower and upper b...

Read full inspector narrative →
5. Review of Resident #26's current ADL self-care performance deficit care plan lacked interventions which included the assistance needed for him/her in the area of personal hygiene, lower and upper body dressing, bathing and shower transfers. On 2/11/25 at 2:08 p.m., the finding was discussed with the Director of Nursing. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed in the area of Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) to meet the preferences and goals which included interventions for assistance needed for each resident to attaining or maintaining his or her highest practicable quality of life for 6 of 14 residents care plans reviewed. (Residents 6, 11, 21, 47, 55, 26, and 61) Findings: 1. Review of Resident #6's current ADL self-care performance deficit care plan lacked interventions which included the assistance needed for him/her in the area of eating, personal hygiene, transfers, lower body dressing, bathing, toileting, bed mobility and ambulating. 2. Review of Resident #11's current ADL self-care performance deficit care plan lacked interventions which included the assistance needed for him/her in the area of eating, personal hygiene, lower body dressing, bathing and oral hygiene. 3. Review of Resident #21's current ADL self-care performance deficit care plan lacked interventions which included the assistance needed for him/her in the area of eating, personal hygiene, transfers, lower body dressing, bathing, toileting, bed mobility and ambulating. 4. Review of Resident #47's current ADL self-care performance deficit care plan lacked interventions which included the assistance needed for him/her in the area of personal hygiene, lower body dressing, bathing, toileting hygiene and oral hygiene. On 2/11/25 at 1:49 p.m., during an interview, the Licensed Practical Nurse Manager for the first floor stated, in the beginning of the year the Minimum Data Set assessments for GG - Functional Abilities were changed, which also changed the residents care plans. This change failed to update the residents' care plan to include the personalization for the assistance needed for each resident to attain or maintain his/her functional abilities. Review of Resident #55s current ADL self-care performance deficit care plan lacked interventions which included the assistance needed for him/her in the area of personal hygiene, lower and upper body dressing, bathing and shower transfers. On 2/11/25 at approximately 3:00 p.m. the finding was discussed with the Director of Nursing 6. Review of Resident #61's current ADL self-care performance deficit care plan lacked interventions which included the assistance needed for him/her in the area of eating, personal hygiene, transfers, lower body dressing, bathing, toileting and bed mobility. On 2/11/25 at approximately 2:00 p.m. a surveyor discussed the above findings with the Unit Director who confirmed that this information didn't automatically transfer with the new Electronic Medical Record system and would need to be added.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation by failing to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts, on 2 of 2 units reviewed. Findings: A review of the facility's Shift Count policy and procedure dated: 2/3/2000, stated under Procedure, 1. All schedule II-V medications will be counted at the change of each shift by the off-going and the on-coming nurse. 3. If the count is correct, the keys change hands and the shift count sheet is signed by both nurses. On 2/11/25 at 11:00 a.m., during a medication storage observation of the Second Floor Medication Room, a surveyor reviewed the Controlled Substance Books and Shift Counts which indicated the facility counts at the change of each shift, approximately 3 times a day. The person authorized to administer medications coming on duty or the person authorized to administer medications going off duty both failed to sign the Shift Count page of the Controlled Substances Book that indicated the controlled substances count was completed on multiple days. On 2/11/25 at 11:45 a.m., the surveyor confirmed the findings with the Unit Manager. On 2/11/25 at 3:30 p.m., the findiing was discussed the findings with the Administrator. On 2/11/25 at 4:00 p.m., during a medication storage observation of the First Floor Medication Room, a surveyor reviewed the Controlled Substance Books and Shift Counts. The person authorized to administer medications coming on duty or the person authorized to administer medications going off duty both failed to sign the Shift Count page of the Controlled Substances Book that indicated the controlled substances count was completed on multiple days. On 2/11/25 at 4:20 p.m., the surveyor confirmed the findings with the Charge Nurse. On 2/12/25 at 10:15 a.m., the surveyor discussed that multiple days on both units were missing staff signatures for verification and completion of the controlled medication count on the following dates: 6/16/24, 9/13/24, 10/2/24, 10/3/24, 11/3/24, 11/6/24, 11/16/24, 11/23/24, 12/2/24, 12/12/24, 12/29/24, 1/3/25, 1/18/25, 1/24/25, 1/25/25, 1/26/25 (both units), 1/27/25, 2/9/25, and 2/10/25.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 2 of 2 un...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 2 of 2 units. Findings: On 2/12/25 at approximately 9:00 a.m. the following was observed on the First floor: -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - Wall behind chair in need of repair. -Many pieces of tape hanging from the ceiling in the main dining room -First floor common area has several dark spots on ceiling strapping -Unpainted repaired area on wall in Spa room. On 2/12/25 at approximately 9:30 a.m. the following was observed on the Second floor: -Stained ceiling tile just outside room [ROOM NUMBER] On 2/12/25 at approximately 10:00a.m. in an interview with the Administrator, the surveyor discussed the environmental observations.
Oct 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to implement interventions outlined in resident's ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to implement interventions outlined in resident's care plan in the area of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed during complaint investigations. (Resident 2). Findings: On 9/13/2024 at 10:19 a.m., the Department of Licensing received a complaint indicating ADL care was not being provided to Resident 2 as stated in the care plan. Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans dated 9/3/94 states It is the policy of Pinnacle Health & Rehab [NAME] to develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident, based on the needs identified in the comprehensive assessment .Each resident's plan of care describes the services being furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical level of functioning . Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include Parkinsons disease and is dependent on facility staff for all ADL needs. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 of 15 indicating he/she has moderate cognitive impairment Review of R2's care plan, most recently updated on 8/27/24 revealed Problem: [Resident 2 has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Parkinson's with tremors and weakness. Goal: [Resident 2] and [his/her] family want [him/her] to maintain current level of function. Intervention: Staff assist with adls (Refer to tasks documentation); Oral hygiene and denture cleaning after each meal and bedtime; Toilet or change resident every 3-4 hours. Turn and reposition every two hours . Further review of Resident 2's entire clinical record lacked evidence that the above interventions were completed as written. During an interview on 10/2/24 at 12:14 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 indicated that Resident 2 needs total care with all ADL's. CNA1 further indicated Resident 2 doesn't really refuse much of anything, but if a resident refuses to do something, they should be reapproached to try again at a later time, if they still refused, inform the nurse and document the refusal in clinical record. During a review of Resident 2's clinical record with a surveyor on 10/1/24 at 3:15 p.m., the Administrator confirmed above findings.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection on 1 of 2 rooms observed (room [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings: Review of facility policy Infection Prevention and Control dated 5/2023 states it is the policy of [Facility] to maintain and active infection prevention and control program (IPCP). The program is designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. Observation of shared sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/1/24 at 9:07 a.m., and 1:10 p.m., revealed the following items unlabeled and available for use: 2 deodorant bottles, 2- 8 ounce bottles of body wash, 1 bottle of mouthwash, 1 can of shaving cream. 1 opened can of ginger ale, 1 electric razor, approximately 8 razors held together with a rubber band, one small, soiled basin, and 1 white paper cup containing 1 toothbrush. During an interview on 10/1/24 at 9:20 a.m., Resident 3 confirmed his/her personal hygiene items are on the sink and he/she can independently use them, stating he/she just grabs what he/she needs and is unsure who it belongs to because they're not labeled. During an interview on 10/1/24 at 1:00 p.m., Resident 2 indicated that he/she does have personal items on the shared sink, but his/her family are the ones that retrieve it for him/her. During an interview on 10/1/24 at 1:10 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 and a surveyor entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and confirmed personal items were on shared sink, unlabeled and available for use. The above was discussed with Administrator on 10/1/24 at 3:10 p.m.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 5 residents records reviewed during complaint investigations (Resident 2). Findings: On 9/13/2024 at 10:19 a.m., the Department of Licensing received a complaint indicating ADL care was not being provided to Resident 2 as stated in the care plan. Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living dated 1/1/95 states .Activities of daily living include bathing, dressing, ambulation and transfer, eating, and use of speech, language or other functional communication systems.the care plan will identify any unique needs or special treatment and services necessary to maintain or improve functional ability. Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease and is dependent on facility staff for all ADL needs. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 of 15 indicating he/she has moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 2's care plan, most recently updated on 8/27/24 revealed Problem: [Resident 2 has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Parkinson's with tremors and weakness. Goal: [Resident 2] and [his/her] family want [him/her] to maintain current level of function. Intervention: Staff assist with adls (Refer to tasks documentation); Oral hygiene and denture cleaning after each meal and bedtime; Toilet or change resident every 3-4 hours. Turn and reposition every two hours . Review of Resident 2's clinical record [task] lacked documented evidence Resident 2 was provide oral hygiene and denture cleaning as follows: after breakfast on 9/2/24, 9/3/24, 9/4/24, 9/5/24, 9/6/24, 9/8/24, 9/9/24, 9/10/24, 9/11/24, 9/12/24, 9/14/24, 9/15/24, 9/16/24, 9/17/24, 9/18/24, 9/19/24, 9/23/24, 9/27/24, 9/28/24, 9/29/24. After lunch on 9/7/24, 9/8/24, 9/9/24, 9/11/24, 9/13/24, 9/14/24, 9/16/24, 9/20/24, 9/21/24, 9/22/24, 9/23/24, 9/25/24, 9/26/24, 9/27/24, or 9/28/24. after dinner on 9/2/24, 9/3/24, 9/4/24, 9/5/24, 9/6/24, 9/7/24, 9/8/24, 9/9/24, 9/10/24, 9/11/24, 9/12/24, 9/13/24, 9/14/24, 9/15/24, 9/16/24, 9/17/24, 9/18/24, 9/22/24, 9/26/24, 9/27/24, or 9/28/24, and at bedtime on 9/2/24, 9/18/24, 9/19/24, 9/20/24, 9/21/24, 9/23/24, 9/25/24, 9/29/24, or 9/30/24. Review of Resident 2's clinical record [task] Toilet or change resident every 3-4 hours(total of 5-6 times daily) revealed Resident 2 was toileted 1 (one) time on 9/14, 2 (two) times on 9/2/24, 9/7/24, 9/8/24, 9/9/24, 9/11/24, 9/16/24, 9/23/24, 9/27/24, 9/28/24 and 9/30/24, and was toileted 3 (three) times on 9/3/24, 9/4/24, 9/5/24, 9/6/24, 9/10/24, 9/12/24, 9/13/24, 9/15/24, 9/17/24, 9/18/24, 9/19/24, 9/20/24, 9/21/24, 9/22/24, 9/24/24, 9/25/24, 9/26/24 and 9/29/24. Review of Resident 2's clinical record [task] Turn and Reposition (per care plan total of 12 times daily) revealed Resident 2 was turned/repositioned 1 (one) time on 9/14/24, 2 (two) times 9/7/24, 9/8/24, 9/9/24, 9/11/24, 9/16/24, 9/23/24, 9/27/24, 9/28/24 and 9/30/24. 2 (two) times on 9/3/24, 9/4/24, 9/5/24, 9/6/24, 9/10/24, 9/12/24, 9/13/24, 9/15/24, 9/17/24, 9/18/24, 9/19/24, 9/20/24, 9/21/24, 9/22/24, 9/24/24, 9/25/24, 9/29/24 and 9/26/24. During an interview on 10/2/24 at 12:14 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 indicated that Resident 2 needs total care with all ADL's. CNA1 further indicated Resident 2 doesn't really refuse much of anything, but if a resident refuses to do something, they should be reproached to try again at a later time, if they still refused, inform the nurse and document the refusal in clinical record. During a review of Resident 2's clinical record on 10/1/24 at 3:15 p.m., the Administrator confirmed above findings.
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain maintenance services necessary to maintain in g...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain maintenance services necessary to maintain in good repair and sanitary condition of arm rests of resident's wheelchair, ceiling tiles in hallways and common areas, and thresh-hold of elevator entrance. Findings: 1. On 11/13/2023, at 10:37a.m. surveyor observed wheelchair arms cracked for Resident #5, in room [ROOM NUMBER], creating an uncleanable surface. 2. On 11/14/2023 at 2:00p.m. during an environmental tour with Director of Facilities Management, the following were observed: First floor: Three stained ceiling tiles above the microwave area in the Main Dining Room Three stained ceiling tiles, just outside of the elevator on the first floor Second floor: Three stained ceiling tiles just outside the elevator in the main hallway Three stained ceiling tiles in the 300-wing hallway just outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] 3. On 11/14/2023 at approximately 3:00p.m. surveyor observed thresh-hold floor plate exiting the elevator was buckled in two different places allowing a gap and creating a trip hazard. On 11/14/2023 at approximately 3:05p.m. all the above were reported and confirmed with the Director of Facilities Management and Administrator.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper medication and biological storage temperatures for 2 of 3 medication refrigerators in 1 of 2 medication stor...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper medication and biological storage temperatures for 2 of 3 medication refrigerators in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms. Finding: On 11/14/2023 at 1:00 p.m., a surveyor observed the 2 medication refrigerators in the first-floor medication storage room. The upper refrigerator contained insulin, and 2 locked boxes for controlled liquid medications. The second refrigerator contained tuberculin purified protein derivative, influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines. Observation of the temperature logs for the medication refrigerators noted multiple shifts were lacking documentation. The Certified Nursing Assistant-Medications confirmed the finding. On 11/15/2023 at 9:50 a.m., a surveyor observed the first-floor medication room and refrigerator temperature logs with a Licensed Practical Nurse who stated the temperatures are to be checked and documented by a licensed nurse at every shift change. A review of the temperature logs lacked evidence of temperature monitoring of medication room refrigerators as follows: November 1-15, 2023, noted incomplete documentation for 5 of 43 shifts. October 1-15, 2023, noted incomplete documentation for 11 of 45 shifts. The facility did not provide evidence of temperatures being monitored from October 16-31, 2023. September 1-30, 2023, noted incomplete documentation for 27 of 90 shifts. August 1-31, 2023, noted incomplete documentation for 30 of 90 shifts. A review of the facility's Immunization Vaccine Storage and Handling Policy and Procedure, with a revision date of 7/2023, stated 6. Refrigerator/freezer temperatures are checked at the change of each shift by a licensed nurse, as part of the medication count process. Temperatures must be within the range of 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit. On 11/15/2023 at 10:30 a.m., the finding was confirmed by the Administrator.
Mar 2022 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition, on 2 of 2 floors (First and Second), and hallways, for 1 of 1 environmental tour. Findings: On 3/2/22 at 10:00 a.m., during the Environmental Tour with the Nurse Managers of the first and second floors, the following was observed: First-floor: The common hallways of the first-floor nursing unit were observed with a dark, dirty buildup along the edges and in the corners. The floors in rooms 131-138 have a dark, dirty buildup, in the corners, in the bathrooms around the toilet bases, and under the sinks. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The wall to the left of the light switch, is noted to have ripped sheetrock on the corner. The sink vanity has a large light-colored stain. room [ROOM NUMBER]- At the entrance to the room, the rubber strip under the door is coming loose. The wall next to the door frame has peeling paint with exposed sheetrock, the sink vanity has four (4) rusted screw heads, creating an uncleanable surface. The area next to the closet is missing a board over the heater, where a cable wire is observed with a loose cover plate and exposed insulation. room [ROOM NUMBER]-B, the floor mat had exposed foam and the zipper tab is broken creating a sharp edge. room [ROOM NUMBER]-B, has a loose board on the edge of the closet over the heater. On 3/2/22 at 10:30 a.m. the surveyor confirmed the first-floor environmental observations with the Nurse Manager. Second-floor: The common hallways of the second-floor nursing unit are observed with a dark, dirty buildup along the edges and in the corners. The floors in rooms 231- 238 are observed to have a dark, dirty buildup, in the corners, in the bathrooms around the toilet bases, and under the sinks. room [ROOM NUMBER]-the sink vanity is observed with broken laminate edges, exposing the wood, creating an uncleanable surface with sharp edges. The heater is observed with areas of rust. room [ROOM NUMBER]-the sink vanity is observed with broken laminate edges, exposing the wood, creating an uncleanable surface with sharp edges. room [ROOM NUMBER]-the sink vanity is observed with broken laminate edges, exposing the wood, creating an uncleanable surface with sharp edges. The elevated surface of the Nurses' station is observed with three strips of duct type tape. The Nurse Manager stated that it had been that way for a while. In addition, the lower surface of the counter has strips of blue painter's type tape on the laminate edges, all creating an uncleanable surface. On 3/2/22 at 11:30 a.m. the surveyor confirmed the second-floor environmental observations with the Nurse Manager.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Transfer Requirements (Tag F0622)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility lacked evidence of a written transfer notice indicating rationale for a facil...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility lacked evidence of a written transfer notice indicating rationale for a facility-initiated transfer for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer (#7, #8 and #51). Findings: 1. Documentation in Resident #7's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Review of the clinical record lacked evidence of a transfer notice indicating rationale for the facility-initiated transfer. 2. Documentation in Resident #8's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] and 12/12/21. Review of the clinical record lacked evidence of a transfer notice indicating rationale for the facility-initiated transfer. 3. Documentation in Resident #51's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute care hospital on 1/4/22. Review of the clinical record lacked evidence of a transfer notice indicating rationale for the facility-initiated transfer. On 3/1/22 at 4:20 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the evening supervisor explained the transfer/discharge process. The facility's transfer form is used for communication to the receiving facility. On 3/2/22 at 9:50 a.m., in an interview with two surveyors, the facility's social worker stated the transfer notice mailed to the resident's representative is included in the discharge to home packet and is not given to residents who are transferred to the hospital or other facility. The social worker confirmed the facility's current forms do not meet the requirements of the regulations for transfer/discharge notices.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice which included the daily bed hold cost, to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice which included the daily bed hold cost, to a resident, known family member or legal representative for 3 of 3 sampled residents who had been transferred to the hospital (#7, #8 and #51). Findings: 1. Resident #7's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. The clinical record contained an incomplete bed-hold notice for the transfer, which did not include the daily bed hold cost. 2. Resident #8's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 12/12/21. The clinical record contained incomplete bed-hold notices for both transfers, which did not include the daily bed hold cost. 3. Resident #51's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 1/4/22. The clinical record contained an incomplete bed-hold notice for the transfer, which did not include the daily bed hold cost. On 3/2/22 at 9:50 a.m., in an interview with surveyors, the facility's social worker confirmed the facility's current forms do not meet the requirements of the regulation for bed hold notices, including information for daily bed hold costs and appeal rights.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Maine.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Maine facilities.
  • • 37% turnover. Below Maine's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Maine, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford Staffed?

CMS rates PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 37%, compared to the Maine average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford?

State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD during 2022 to 2025. These included: 9 with potential for harm and 3 minor or isolated issues.

Who Owns and Operates Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford?

PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 86 certified beds and approximately 68 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SANFORD, Maine.

How Does Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford Compare to Other Maine Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Maine, PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (37%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Maine. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford Stick Around?

PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD has a staff turnover rate of 37%, which is about average for Maine nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford Ever Fined?

PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Pinnacle Health & Rehab At Sanford on Any Federal Watch List?

PINNACLE HEALTH & REHAB AT SANFORD is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.