CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Center has received a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns about the facility's operations and care quality. They rank #78 out of 338 in Massachusetts, placing them in the top half of nursing homes in the state, but their overall poor rating is troubling. The facility's situation is worsening, as the number of reported issues increased from 3 in 2024 to 5 in 2025, and recent inspections revealed 11 deficiencies, including three critical incidents where a resident fell during a transfer that required assistance from two staff members, resulting in serious injuries. While staffing is a strength with a 5/5 star rating and a low turnover of 28%, there have been concerning incidents of neglect that highlight gaps in care. Additionally, the facility faced $25,497 in fines, which is average, further emphasizing the need for improvement in compliance and resident safety.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Massachusetts
- #78/338
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Massachusetts's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $25,497 in fines. Lower than most Massachusetts facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 61 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Massachusetts nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (28%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (28%)
20 points below Massachusetts average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
3 deficiencies
3 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required two staff members assistance with the mechanical sling lift for all transfers, the Facility fai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose comprehensive plan of care interventions indicated that he/she required the assistance of two staff me...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required two staff member assistance using the mechanical sling lift for all transfers, the Facility fail...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one Resident (#72) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifical...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and dated once opened, according t...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
3 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who had a history of having sustained a subdural hematoma (pool of blood between the brain and it;s outer co...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a diagnosis of dementia and was cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure care and treatment...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3), the Facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medications errors when 1)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3) the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate Medical Records when Medication Administra...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Massachusetts's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $25,497 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 11 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $25,497 in fines. Higher than 94% of Massachusetts facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (17/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Massachusetts, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 28%, compared to the Massachusetts average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 6 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr?
CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 179 certified beds and approximately 94 residents (about 53% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in BEDFORD, Massachusetts.
How Does Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr Compare to Other Massachusetts Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Massachusetts, CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (28%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Massachusetts. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr Stick Around?
Staff at CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 28%, the facility is 18 percentage points below the Massachusetts average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr Ever Fined?
CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR has been fined $25,497 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Massachusetts average of $33,334. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Carleton-Willard Village Retirement & Nursing Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
CARLETON-WILLARD VILLAGE RETIREMENT & NURSING CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.