SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided residents with adequate supervision for four Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided residents with adequate supervision for four Residents (#22, #26, #1, and #8), out of 16 sampled residents, and an environment free from accident hazards on two of two units in the facility.
Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:
1. For Resident #22, that effective care plan interventions were developed and implemented to prevent a fall with major injury;
2. For Resident #26, that effective care plan interventions were developed and implemented to prevent seven falls;
3. For Resident #1, that effective care plan interventions were developed and implemented to prevent three falls;
4. For Resident #8, that effective care plan interventions were developed and implemented to prevent four falls ;
5. The clean utility room on Unit 4 was locked and hazardous items including topical treatments were securely stored and not accessible to wandering residents; and
6. Medications were not left unsecured and accessible to residents on a medication cart on Unit 3.
Findings include:
Review of the facility's policy, Fall Prevention Program, last revised 8/2021, included, but was not limited to:
-Goal: To identify residents at risk for falls and assure appropriate intervention for prevention of falls are implemented. To prevent injury with falls to the extent possible.
-Procedure: Residents determined to be high risk for falls, may have the following preventative measures implemented:
-Physical Therapy screen and follow recommendations
-Frequent visual safety checks at regular intervals if necessary
-Residents determined to be at risk will have the potential for falls reviewed at the weekly RISK team meeting and addressed on their care plan with the appropriate interventions documented. The CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] assignment will indicate the resident is at risk for falls
-The CNA Care Plan/Assignment & Resident Care -Plan will be updated with any change when the change occurs
FALLS:
1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in March 2018 with diagnoses including dementia and a history of falls.
Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #22 requires extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, bed mobility and utilized a wheelchair. The assessment indicated the Resident was unsteady and only able to stabilize with assistance when moving from a seated position to standing.
Review of Resident #22's Interdisciplinary Care Plans included, but was not limited to:
-Problem: Resident is at risk for falling related to a history of falls, dementia, incontinence and poor safety awareness (3/6/18)
-Approach: Keep visible when up due to impulsive and history of falls (12/7/21); No chuck pad on wheelchair to prevent sliding from chair (7/6/20); Prefers to stay up until 10:00 P.M. (2/28/21); Encourage resident to assume a standing position slowly (3/6/18); Give resident verbal reminders not to ambulate/transfer without assistance (3/6/18); Keep bed in lowest position with brakes locked (3/6/18); Prompted toileting every A.M., P.M., before/after meals, bedtime and as needed (3/6/18)
-Goal: Resident will remain free from injury with fall initiated (9/20/20)
Review of the medical record indicated Resident #22 had seven falls from December 2021 to October 2022. Review of the falls indicated:
1.12/7/21 at 8:15 A.M., Resident was found on the floor mat next to bed. Review of the documentation failed to indicate what interventions were in place at the time of the fall, or interventions implemented to reduce the risk of future falls.
2. 2/9/22 at 10:15 P.M., Resident was found on the floor in the bathroom doorway in his/her room. Intervention identified to prevent the risk of falls was an eval. Review of the medical record failed to indicate an eval was conducted. No new interventions were put in place to prevent further falls.
3. 2/13/22 at 4:15 A.M., Resident was found on the floor mat next to bed. Intervention identified to prevent the risk of falls was an eval. Review of the medical record failed to indicate an eval was conducted. No new interventions were put in place to prevent further falls.
4. 6/18/22 at 10:00 A.M., Resident was found on the floor in the dining room on his/her back with blood coming from the head area. Review of the documentation failed to indicate what interventions were in place at the time of the fall. Intervention identified to prevent the risk of falls was an eval. A staff statement (CNA) indicated Resident #22 was toileted at 8:00 A.M. and was last seen sleeping in his/her wheelchair in the unit dining room. Review of the medical record failed to indicate any new interventions to prevent further falls.
Review of a 6/18/22 Nursing Progress Note indicated that at approximately 10:00 A.M., the Nurse and CNA heard a thump, saw Resident #22 on the floor in the unit dining room on his/her back with blood coming from his/her head. The Resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation.
Review of the medical record and Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #22 presented to the Emergency Department after having an unwitnessed fall from his/her wheelchair with a head strike and laceration to the right forehead. The documentation indicated facility staff report the Resident slides out of his/her wheelchair occasionally. The assessment and plan indicated the Resident did not sustain a fracture but had a large forehead laceration and hematoma. The wound was cleaned and was going to be repaired by the PA (Physician's Assistant), however the size of the hematoma made it impossible to approximate the wound edges. Even with removal of some clot, the wound was too gaping to suture.
Review of a 6/19/22 Nursing Progress Note indicated the forehead laceration measured 4.9 centimeters (cm) x 1.5 cm.
5. 7/25/22 at 4:00 A.M., Resident was found on the floor mat next to bed. Intervention identified to prevent the risk of falls was a PT eval. Review of the medical record failed to indicate a PT eval was conducted and no interventions were implemented to prevent further falls.
6. 9/19/22 at 10:30 P.M., Resident was found on the floor mat next to bed. Intervention identified to prevent the risk of falls was PT to screen. Review of the Rehabilitation Screen documentation failed to indicate any new interventions were recommended.
7. 10/5/22 at 12:32 A.M., Resident found on the floor mat next to bed. Intervention identified to prevent the risk of falls was screen. Review of the Rehabilitation Screen documentation failed to indicate any new interventions were recommended.
During an interview on 10/7/22 at 11:30 A.M., the surveyor and Nursing Supervisor reviewed Resident #22's falls. The Nursing Supervisor said that the team had discussed different interventions to prevent falls but had not implemented any. She could not explain why the Resident's fall on 6/18/22 was unwitnessed and the care plan intervention of being kept visible when up due to impulsive behavior was not implemented . The Nursing Supervisor confirmed that no new interventions have been developed or implemented to prevent Resident #22 from having further falls.
Review of the medical record on 10/20/22 indicated that Resident #22 was found on the floor mat next to bed. Intervention identified to prevent the risk of falls was a raised perimeter mattress placed on the Resident's bed.
2. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in August 2017 with diagnoses including hypertension.
Review of the 8/22/22 Minimum Data Set assessment indicated that Resident #26 requires supervision for transfers, walking in his/her room, toileting and personal hygiene. The assessment also indicated that the Resident is unsteady while walking, turning around, turning around and facing the opposite direction while walking and moving on and off the toilet.
Review of interdisciplinary care plans included, but was not limited to:
Problem: Resident is at risk for falling related to unsteady gait, psychotropic medication use (8/22/17)
Approach: Keep call light and personal items in reach at all times (8/22/17); Encourage resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips, handrails, etc. (8/22/17); Provide verbal cues to stand tall and slow down during ambulation (12/9/19); Per request of Resident, handheld assist as required (2/6/20); Extra railing added along the wall to the bathroom for extra support (2/7/20)
Goal: Resident will be free from injury (9/3/20)
Review of the medical record indicated Resident #26 had seven falls from February 2022 to October 2022. Review of the falls failed indicated:
1. 2/18/22 at 1:45 A.M., Resident was found lying face down on the floor next to bed with pants around his/her ankles. A bruise was noted to the Resident's forehead and a skin tear to his/her left elbow. Review of documentation failed to indicate what interventions were in place at the time of the fall, or interventions implemented to reduce the risk of falls.
2. 4/3/22 at 12:15 A.M., Resident was found sitting on his/her buttocks in front of the toilet. Intervention identified to prevent the risk of falls was PT screen. Review of the Rehabilitation Screen documentation failed to indicate any new interventions were recommended.
3. 4/12/22 at 8:45 P.M., Resident was found on the floor lying on his/her right side in the bathroom. Intervention identified to prevent the risk of falls was PT screen. Review of the Rehabilitation Screen documentation indicated a recommendation for Occupational Therapy (OT) to evaluate and treat the Resident to increase safety and independence in room. The Physician wrote an order for an OT evaluation and treatment. Review of the 5/24/22 OT evaluation indicated the treatment plan would include therapeutic activity, therapeutic exercise, self-care/home management and balance twice a week for eight weeks. The OT evaluation failed to indicate any Resident specific interventions staff could implement to prevent further falls.
4. 5/21/22 at 9:05 P.M., Resident was found sitting on the floor in the bathroom. The section of the report to identify steps taken to prevent recurrence was blank. Review of the medical record failed to indicate any new interventions were implemented to prevent further falls.
Review of a 5/27/22 OT treatment note indicated that while transferring to the toilet, Resident #26 continues to be unsafe due to increased knee flexion and shuffling gait.
5. 5/29/22 at 6:58 A.M., Resident was found on the floor in his/her room by custodial staff. The section of the report to identify steps taken to prevent recurrence was blank.
Review of a 6/10/22 OT treatment note indicated Resident #26 presents with impaired insight into errors and deficits, requiring maximum cueing to maximize safety.
Review of a 9/13/22 OT treatment note indicated Resident #26 walked to the bathroom with distant supervision and cueing and education for safety.
6. 10/2/22 at 8:44 P.M., Resident was found on the floor sitting on the floor in the bathroom. Interventions identified to prevent the risk of falls was: placed on falling star prevention program, encourage resident to ring call bell in bathroom for dressing/undressing.
During an interview on 10/20/22 at 11:44 A.M., Physical Therapist (PT) #1 said she is aware Resident #26 has had multiple unwitnessed falls in the bathroom. She said the Resident participates in the Vitality program three days a week (ambulation by rehabilitation staff). The surveyor and PT reviewed the Resident's OT notes and were unable to identify any approaches identified for staff to implement to prevent further falls. She said every two-hour toileting program or increased supervision are interventions that could be implemented to prevent further falls, but she could not explain why they have not been attempted.
During an interview on 10/20/22 at 12:25 P.M., Nurse #2 said that Resident #26 gets weak and falls in the bathroom. The surveyor asked Nurse #2 if she has any ideas of how to prevent the Resident from falling again and she said that he/she may be receptive to every 2-hour toileting, or distant supervision. The Nurse did not know why these interventions had not been attempted.
3. Resident #1 was admitted in 4/2010 with diagnoses which included, dementia in other diseases, bipolar disorder, delusional disorders, anxiety disorder, unspecified, and Parkinson's Disease. The Resident's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 6 out of 15, indicated the presence of severe cognitive impairment.
Additionally, the Resident was identified by the facility to be at high risk for falls, according to a John Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment score of #18 (>#13 High Risk).
According to the Resident's Plan of Care for: Resident at risk for falling R/T Parkinson's disease, history of falls, poor safety awareness, was revised on 10/20/2022 (date of survey).
The Goal was-Resident will remain free from injury.
Approaches to achieve the goal were as follows:
Start Date 10/18/22
-Resident identified as a fall risk. Place resident on Falling Star program.
Start Date 7/30/2020
-Wander Guard placed on w/c (wheelchair) for safety.
Start Date 4/30/2010
-Do not leave alone in bathroom.
-Encourage resident to assume a standing position slowly.
-Encourage resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips, hand rails, etc.
-Give resident verbal reminders not to ambulate/transfer without assistance.
-Keep call light in reach at all times.
-Keep personal items and frequently used items within reach.
-Provide resident with safety device /appliance: Gait belt, wheelchair.
-Provide toileting assistance QAM, Before/after meals, HS and PRN.
-Reacher within reach at all times.
-Wheelchair for all mobility.
Further Record review on 10/20/22, indicated that, despite the Plan of Care to prevent accidents and injury, the Resident experienced a total of 3 falls between the period of 5/2022 to 9/22/22 as indicated below:
1. On 5/13/2022 at 7:10 A.M., the Resident reportedly slid out of the wheelchair to the floor across from the nurse's station in the hallway by the clean utility room. The Resident was assessed by the nurse and no injuries were reported. The incident report indicated that steps taken to prevent recurrence included: PT eval (physical therapy) evaluation, refused wedge, frequent positioning, at times the Resident sits on the edge of the wheelchair. No additional interventions were listed following this fall to provide increased supervision and safety.
2. On 9/16/2022 at 2:45 A.M., the Resident was reportedly found lying on the floor (unwitnessed) in his/her room, sustained bruises to bilateral hands, right arm skin tear and bruises/abrasions on right lower leg. The incident investigation indicated that a PT eval would be done to prevent recurrence. No other interventions were listed to prevent further falls/injury, provide adequate supervision, and maintain the Resident's safety.
3. On 9/18/22 at 5:05 P.M., the Resident was reportedly found on the floor (unwitnessed) by a CNA (certified nursing assistant) on his/her knees with his/her head laying on the mattress at the foot of the bed. Interventions listed to prevent recurrence included use of the reacher (resident stated reaching for it unknown what) Encourage out of bed for meals d/t (due to) impulsivity. Although interventions were considered for this Resident, the Resident would not reliably remember information provided by staff, due to his/her severe cognitive decline. No additional interventions were implemented to provide greater supervision to maintain the Resident's safety and prevent injury.
On 10/20/22 at 11:11 A.M., the Resident was observed in her room, sitting in his/her wheelchair, unsupervised, watching television. The Resident appeared to recognize this writer, and with garbled speech commented on their clothing. The Resident was observed rummaging through his/her drawers, wanted to shut his/her TV off but had difficulty doing so due to his/her debility in movement. Several minutes later, the Resident propelled the wheelchair to the doorway to his/her room, unsupervised, and appeared unsure of what to do. The Resident was non-ambulatory.
The Administrator was interviewed on 10/20/22 at 1:50 P.M., regarding the frequent falls for this Resident, one fall with skin tears and bruises, and the risk for additional falls and injury remained due to ineffective safety interventions and supervision. The Administrator said that interventions to prevent falls had not been effective.
4. Resident #8 was admitted in 9/2017 with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. The medical record indicated that the Resident scored a 4 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status), which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Therapy indicated on 9/5/22, that an assist of 1 person continued to be required for all stand pivot transfers and the Resident was able to propel the wheelchair using BLE (bilateral lower extremities).
On 9/5/22, a John Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment was performed which indicated a score of #18, placing the Resident at high risk for falls.
The Resident's plan of care to address Falls was reviewed and indicated the following goals and interventions:
GOAL: Resident will remain free from injury. Start Date: 9/26/2017
Approach: Provide toileting assistance per resident's toileting schedule
-Give resident verbal reminders to use her call bell and wait for staff to assist her. Keep personal items in reach
-Call light and personal items within reach. Night light on at HS (hour or sleep)
Start Date: 12/14/21
Approach: Call before you fall/reminder sign posted at wheelchair height.
Start Date: 10/18/22
Approach: Resident identified as a high risk for falls. Resident placed on Falling Star program. Falling star placed in resident shadow box for fall identification.
Start Date: 10/19/22
Approach: Resident falls identified when reaching for items. Table ordered to allow resident to wheel wheelchair into, edges to prevent cards from slipping off, and is adjustable to resident.
1. On 6/15/22 at 5:00 P.M., the Resident fell and was found on the floor (unwitnessed) next to his/her wheelchair. Review of the incident/accident report, indicated that when asked, the Resident said that he/she was standing and reaching and then, I don't know. A small hematoma was found on the back of the Resident's head. The incident/accident report indicated that steps taken to prevent recurrence was a PT screen.
2. On 8/3/22 at 2:30 P.M., the Resident was found on the floor (unwitnessed) in his/her room next to his/her wheelchair. The incident/accident report indicated that the Resident was able to move all extremities, vital signs were stable, the Resident was alert and answering questions appropriately. The Resident was unable to state how he/she fell. The wheelchair was at reach beside the Resident. A reddened area was noted at the right, lower rib cage which resolved after 10 minutes.
Steps taken to prevent recurrence noted on the incident/accident report were, PT eval and new tray table attempt for cards. No additional interventions were considered to prevent further falls/injury to the Resident.
Physical therapy's evaluation of the Resident on 8/4/22, indicated, Frequent visual checks by all staff recommended and anticipation of needs to limit his/her reaching far forward.
3. On 8/17/22 at 1:45 P.M., Resident was reportedly heard yelling help. According to the incident/accident report, upon entering the room, the nurse found the Resident lying on the floor on his/her left side between the radiator and the closet. The Resident was alert, assessed by the nurse, and found to have no injuries.
The incident/accident report indicated that, steps taken to prevent recurrence were,
-encourage Resident to ring call bell for fallen cards, and
-continue to reinforce call bell use. (Resident with severe dementia)
4. On 9/13/22 at 6:33 A.M., the Resident was found (unwitnessed) sitting on the floor in his/her room leaning against the bed. According to the incident/accident report, the Resident fell out of bed while trying to get to his/her wheelchair to use the bathroom. No apparent injuries were noted. The incident/accident report indicated that steps taken to prevent recurrence included,
-educate resident on importance of waiting for assistance.
-Reinforce call bell use. (Resident with severe dementia)
In spite of approaches listed in the Resident's plan of care, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and effective/appropriate interventions to prevent falls/accidents.
Interview with the administrator on 10/20/22 at 1:55 P.M., said that the facility had a significant number of falls. She acknowledged that interventions, at times, were not effective and did not necessarily take into account the unique behaviors of residents and patterns associated with the falls.
SAFETY HAZARDS
5. On 10/4/22 from 1:30 P.M. to 1:56 P.M., the surveyor observed two residents wandering the hallway on Unit 4 (secured unit/Memory Impaired). There was no facility staff visible in the unit hallway at the time of the observation.
On 10/4/22 at 1:57 P.M. on Unit 4, the surveyor approached a closed door labeled clean utility. The door had a numerical combination lock on it, but the door was not pulled tight and secured and was easily pushed open.
The room contained an unlocked treatment cart with a plastic caddy placed on top of the
cart containing a bottle of fingernail polish remover, 12 bottles of fingernail polish, and one wooden manicure stick. The drawers of the treatment cart contained:
-Drawer #1: two boxes of zinc oxide skin protectant ointment, two boxes of hemorrhoidal
ointment, two tubes moisture barrier antifungal cream, one bottle of skin prep spray.
-Drawer #2: one box of 200 alcohol prep wipes
-Drawer #3: one bottle of fecal occult blood developing solution, one bag of wooden specimen sticks
-Drawer #4: one box of Bacitracin Zinc antibiotic ointment
Shelves in the clean utility room contained:
-five bottles of baby powder
-16 bottles of moisturizing body lotion with mineral oil
-22 bottles of deodorant
-15 bottles of shampoo
-13 bottles of body wash
-14 bottles of hand sanitizer
-five cans of shaving cream
-one box of 144 packets of Bacitracin antibiotic ointment
-four boxes of zinc oxide ointment
-30 packets of white petroleum skin protectant
-three boxes of denture cleanser tablets
-seven boxes of denture adhesive
-seven boxes of toothpaste
-18 bottles of mouthwash
During an interview on 10/4/22 at 2:08 P.M., the surveyor showed Nurse #1 the unsecured clean utility room door. Nurse #1 pushed open the door and said the room is supposed to be locked at all times.
6. On 10/20/22 from 12:18 P.M. to 12:22 P.M., the surveyor observed one resident wandering the hallway on Unit 3. There was no facility staff visible in the unit hallways at the time of the observation.
On 10/20/22 at 12:22 P.M. on Unit 3, the surveyor observed a medication cart positioned against the nursing station desk (opposite side that faces the unit dining room). There were 26 medication cards filled with prescription medication, two boxes of inhalers and a bag filled with medications and treatments on top of the medication cart. The surveyor observed Nurse #2 and a Certified Nursing Assistant in the unit dining room approximately 30 feet away from the medication cart. The line of sight from the dining room to the medication cart was obstructed by walls surrounding the nursing station. At 12:24, Nurse #2 approached the surveyor at the medication cart and said that she had to change out an oxygen tank for a resident seated in the dining room. She said that before changing the oxygen tank, she should have either locked the medications in the cart or brought them to the medication room.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for one Resident (#179), out of a total sample of 16 residents, to complete and implement a baseline care plan that included initial goals, in...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for one Resident (#179), out of a total sample of 16 residents, to complete and implement a baseline care plan that included initial goals, interventions, and a summary of the resident's fall risk and medications.
Findings include:
Resident #179 was admitted to the facility in September 2022.
Review of the admission History and Physical completed by the attending physician indicated Resident #179 had diagnoses including depression, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, and a personal history of falls.
Review of the September 2022 admission Physician's Orders indicated the Resident was prescribed Zoloft (an antidepressant), Eliquis (an anticoagulant), and Lantus insulin.
Review of the Fall Risk Assessment Tool completed and signed on 9/28/22 indicated Resident #179 was at moderate risk for falls.
Review of the Occupational Therapy Screen completed upon admission indicated the Resident required supervision for mobility with a rolling walker.
Review of the Baseline Care Plan for Resident #179 failed to indicate care plans for the moderate fall risk, use of psychotropic medication (Zoloft), use of anticoagulant medication (Eliquis), or use of Lantus insulin.
During an interview on 10/6/22 at 8:57 A.M., Social Worker #1 said the Resident was admitted from the community for a history of falling and furniture walking at home. She said the baseline care plan indicating the last fall to be one year ago was inaccurate. She said the baseline care plan does not involve any goal setting or interventions necessary and those items are determined after they get to know the Resident better and are part of a larger care plan process a few weeks after admission.
During an interview on 10/6/22 at 9:03 A.M., Rehab staff #1 said all new admissions are screened upon admission. She said the Rehab Department doesn't have much involvement in the baseline care plan process but does provide information to nursing from the screens that are completed. She said the Rehab Team does not create goals or any interventions on the baseline care plan.
During an interview on 10/6/22 at 12:22 P.M., the Director of Nurses said the baseline care plan should have as much information as possible to help the staff best care for and monitor the Resident until a full comprehensive care plan is developed. Upon reviewing the baseline care plan for Resident #179 she said it did not have any goals or interventions in place indicating the Resident's fall risk, nor did it address the medications or any monitoring for medications including monitoring for side effects.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and consistently implemented for two Residents (#13 and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and consistently implemented for two Residents (#13 and #22), out of 16 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:
1. For Resident #13,
a. develop a care plan to reflect the provision of community volunteer services; and
b. develop a care plan for the use of anticoagulant medication; and
2. For Resident #22, to develop a care plan for the use of psychotropic medication that identified resident specific targeted behaviors, individualized interventions, and measurable goals.
Findings include:
1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses including dementia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Review of October 2022 Physician's Orders indicated:
-Continue [local] Hospice Care (7/27/21)
a. Review of Hospice documentation binder indicated Resident #13 was seen by a Registered Nurse twice monthly since July 2021. The documentation included comprehensive assessments of the Resident's pain, respiratory status, cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal/nutrition, genitourinary, musculoskeletal system, activities of daily living, fall risk assessment, psychosocial status, skin assessment, Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk, vital signs, and review of the Resident's medication regime.
Review of interdisciplinary care plans failed to indicate a care plan had been developed for services provided to Resident #13 by a volunteer community Hospice organization.
During an interview on 10/06/22 at 9:54 A.M., the facility's Social Worker reviewed Resident #13's medical record and said that the Hospice Care is a volunteer program in the community that provides Hospice and Palliative Care. She said a Registered Nurse comes into the facility twice a month to see the Resident. The Social Worker said she thought she developed a care plan for this service but did not.
b. Review of October 2022 Physician's Orders indicated:
-Eliquis (anticoagulant) 2.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day (7/27/21)
Review of Interdisciplinary Care Plans failed to indicate a care plan had been developed for the use of Eliquis.
2. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in March 2018 with diagnoses including dementia and depression.
Review of the October 2022 Physician's Orders indicated:
-Sertraline/Zoloft 25 mg, two tablets once a morning for major depressive disorder (4/10/21)
Review of interdisciplinary care plans included, but was not limited to:
-Problem: Resident has a history of depression (3/6/18)
-Approach: Zoloft 50 mg daily (1/30/20); Document symptoms of depression (3/6/18); Encourage participation in activities of choice (3/6/18); Monitor mood and behavior each shift (3/6/18)
-Goal: Will not show any decrease in level of care related to depressive symptoms times 90 days (9/20/20)
Further review of the care plan failed to identify Resident specific targeted signs/symptoms of depression, Resident specific interventions, including non-pharmacological approaches, and measurable goals for the use of antidepressant medication to meet the Resident's needs.
During an interview on 10/5/22 at 3:35 P.M., the surveyor and Nurse #1 reviewed Residents #13 and #22's medical records. Nurse #1 confirmed that there was no care plan in place for the use of anticoagulant medication for Resident #13, and Resident #22's care plan for the use of psychotropic medications did not include Resident specific targeted behaviors, Resident specific interventions, and measurable goals of treatment.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor three Residents (#179, #18, and #13), out of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor three Residents (#179, #18, and #13), out of a total sample of 16 residents, for potential adverse reactions and side effects to Eliquis, an anticoagulant medication used to thin the blood and prevent clots.
Findings include:
Review of Bristol [NAME] Squib's website indicated Eliquis may have side effects and to call your doctor or get medical help right away if you have any of these signs or symptoms of unexpected bleeding or bleeding that lasts a long time, such as:
-Unusual bleeding from the gums
-Nosebleeds that happen often
-Menstrual or vaginal bleeding that is heavier than normal
-Bleeding that is severe, or you cannot control
-Red, pink, or brown urine
-Red or black stools (looks like tar)
-Coughing up or vomiting blood
-Vomit that looks like coffee grounds
-Unexpected pain, swelling, or joint pain
-Headaches
-Feeling dizzy or weak
1. Resident #179 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation.
Review of the Physician's Orders for October 2022 indicated Resident #179 was prescribed Eliquis.
Review of the October 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #179 indicated Eliquis was administered as prescribed but failed to indicate any monitoring for potential signs and symptoms of adverse reactions including bruising or bleeding.
2. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in August of 2022 with diagnoses including respiratory failure and atrial fibrillation.
Review of the Physician's Orders for October 2022 indicated Resident #18 was prescribed Eliquis.
Review of the October 2022 MAR for Resident #18 indicated Eliquis was administered as prescribed but failed to indicate any monitoring for potential signs and symptoms of side effects such as bleeding or bruising.
During an interview on 10/06/22 at 11:21 A.M., Nurse #3 said neither Resident #179 nor Resident #18 had any formalized monitoring for their anticoagulant use and that is not a process that is in place at this facility.
During an interview on 10/6/22 at 12:24 P.M., the Director of Nurses said there is nowhere that nurses routinely document the monitoring for potential side effects of anticoagulants like Eliquis, but her expectation is the nurses are aware of any potential side effects and would document them if they should occur.
3. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Review of the October 2022 Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to:
-Eliquis 2.5 milligrams (mg) twice daily (7/27/21)
The Physician's Orders failed to include monitoring the Resident for potential side effects of anticoagulant use.
Review of August 2022 through October 2022 MARs indicated Eliquis was administered as ordered by the Physician.
Further review of the medical record failed to indicate that staff monitored the Resident for signs/symptoms of bleeding as required.
During an interview on 10/5/22 at 3:35 P.M., Nurse #1 reviewed Resident #13's medical record and said signs/symptoms of potential side effects of anticoagulant use are not monitored but should be.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete, accurate, and systematically organized within accepted professional standards and practi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete, accurate, and systematically organized within accepted professional standards and practice for one Resident (#12), out of a total sample of 16 residents.
Findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled Cardiac Pacemaker Monitoring, last revised 9/2022, included but was not limited to:
-If Windemere has not received a report regarding the pacemaker check in seven business days, Windemere staff will contact provider's office and request report to be filed in patient/resident medical chart.
Resident #12 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including sick sinus syndrome and presence of a cardiac pacemaker (an artificial device for stimulating the heart muscle and regulating its contractions).
Review of the medical record indicated Physician's Orders included but was not limited to:
-Pacemaker checks via telephone, every 3 months via remote access (4/10/20)
Review of the medical record indicated documentation for pacemaker checks conducted on:
-9/12/19
-10/14/19
-9/25/20
-4/26/21
-10/25/21
There was no additional pacemaker check documentation in the medical record.
During an interview on 10/05/22 at 2:09 P.M., the surveyor and Nurse #1 reviewed Resident #13's medical record. Nurse #1 said there was no additional pacemaker check documentation in the medical record.
During an interview on 10/6/22 at 2:00 P.M., the Staff Development Coordinator said the Resident's pacemaker check documentation was not in his/her medical record and had to be downloaded and printed from the hospital's electronic medical record.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two Residents (#6 and #25), out of a total sample of 16 residents, and for one unit (Unit 4-secured/memory impaire...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two Residents (#6 and #25), out of a total sample of 16 residents, and for one unit (Unit 4-secured/memory impaired unit) of two units, an activity program was implemented that engaged the residents and supported their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Findings include:
Review of the facility's policies, Activities and Recreation, last revised 6/2001, and Memory Care at Windemere, dated 9/2022, included, but was not limited to:
-This facility provides an organized program of purposeful activities and recreation suited to the needs and interests of all its residents, from those who are bed ridden to those who are fully ambulatory.
-Knowing each person's past and current interests has allowed us to gear each day to meet the needs of all our residents.
-The program is designed to fulfill basic psychological, intellectual, physical, social and spiritual needs and utilizes a range of community, social, recreational, public and voluntary resources to promote facility-community relationships and to provide a broad assessment of scheduled activities.
-The Activities Director supervises all volunteer activities and arranges for religious services, and participates in resident reviews, staff meetings and in-service educational programs.
-Ancillary staff are employed to assist the Activities Director and to provide a minimum of 20 hours of activity and recreation per unit per week.
-All residents are evaluated by the Activities Department following admission to determine the resident's interests, dislikes, goals, and needs. From this assessment an activity care plan is developed which is specific to the needs of each resident and consistent with the findings.
1. Review of the August, September, and October 2022 monthly activity calendars failed to indicate 20 hours of scheduled activity and recreation per week on each unit (14 to 18 hours a week on Unit 3 and 6 hours a week on Unit 4) according to facility policy.
On 10/4/22 at 11:15 A.M., the surveyor observed seven residents in the Unit 4 dayroom. The television was on and playing a children's movie. One resident was seated at a table watching/listening to a movie on a DVD player; one resident was doing a puzzle; one resident was asleep while seated at a table; two residents were seated at tables with their backs facing away from the television; one resident was asleep in a wheelchair and one resident was scooting him/herself in a wheelchair in the room. No activity staff were on the unit.
During an interview on 10/4/22 at 11:18 A.M., Nurse #1 said some residents are taken off the unit when there is musical entertainment on Unit 3, but others stay behind and there are no activity staff on the unit regularly.
On 10/4/22 at 1:55 P.M., the surveyor observed six residents in the Unit 4 dayroom. The television was on and playing a Christmas movie. One resident was watching the movie; three residents were sleeping while seated at tables; one resident was scooting him/herself in a wheelchair in the room, and one resident was sitting idly with his/her back to the television. No activity staff were on the unit.
On 10/5/22 at 10:06 A.M., the surveyor observed eight residents in the Unit 4 dayroom. Four residents were sleeping in their chairs, two residents were watching television, and three residents were seated at tables with their backs to the television sitting idly. No activity staff were on the unit. At 10:16 A.M., a staff member came onto the unit and accompanied four residents off the unit to listen to musical entertainment. Four residents remained in the Unit 4 dayroom.
On 10/6/22 at 3:03 P.M., the surveyor observed three residents in the Unit 4 dayroom. Two residents were sleeping in their chairs and one resident was awake watching television.
2. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in February 2005 with diagnoses including dementia.
Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/12/22, indicated that it is somewhat important for Resident #6 to participate in religious services or practices.
Review of the Annual Recreation Assessment, dated 9/12/22, indicated Resident #6's activity preferences included spiritual/religious activities with a focus of programming to include religious activities.
Review of the August, September, and October 2022 Activity Calendars failed to indicate any religious or spiritual programming to meet his/her needs.
3. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility in August 2021 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, mood disturbance, and anxiety.
Review of the MDS assessment, dated 8/1/22, indicated that it is somewhat important for Resident #6 to participate in religious services or practices.
Review of the Annual Recreation Assessment, dated 8/2/22, indicated Resident #25's activity preferences included spiritual/religious activities with a focus of programming to include religious activities.
Review of the August, September, and October 2022 Activity Calendars failed to indicate any religious or spiritual programming to meet his/her needs.
Further review of the activity calendars failed to indicate residents were provided 20 hours of activity and recreation per unit per week.
During an interview on 10/6/22 at 3:55 P.M., the Activity Director (AD) said only one activity is scheduled on Unit 4 daily because the residents on that unit get up in the morning, eat breakfast, a few residents go off the unit to listen to music, eat lunch, and then take a nap in the afternoon. She said that she is the only activity staff for the facility and the Certified Nursing Assistant on the unit can turn on the television for the residents if she wants to. The AD said that she does not have anyone come in from the community to meet the residents' religious/spiritual needs.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
4. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in August 2021 with diagnoses including recurrent depressive disorder.
Review of the October 2022 Physician's Orders for Resident #19 indicated he/she rec...
Read full inspector narrative →
4. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in August 2021 with diagnoses including recurrent depressive disorder.
Review of the October 2022 Physician's Orders for Resident #19 indicated he/she received Lexapro (an antidepressant) and Trazodone (an antidepressant) both once a day.
Review of Resident #19's care plans indicated a care plan for psychotropic medication use related to a history of depression and included an intervention to administer medications, monitor and record effectiveness as needed, and report any adverse effects.
Review of the October 2022 MAR for Resident #19 failed to indicate any monitoring for signs and symptoms of potential side effects of these medications.
Further review of the medical record failed to indicate any nursing documentation for the monitoring of potential adverse effects of the Resident's dual antidepressant use.
During an interview on 10/5/22 at 1:35 P.M., Nurse #2 said there is nowhere that she is aware of that the nurses document the monitoring of signs and symptoms of adverse effects from psychotropic medications.
5. Resident #179 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including depression.
Review of the Physician's Orders for October 2022 indicated Resident #179 was prescribed Zoloft (an antidepressant).
Review of the October 2022 MAR for Resident #179 failed to indicate any monitoring for signs and symptoms of potential side effects or effectiveness of his/her psychotropic medication.
Review of the medical record failed to indicate any documentation regarding monitoring the effectiveness or for potential side effects of Resident #179's antidepressant use.
During an interview on 10/5/22 at 2:01 P.M., the Nursing supervisor said that nurses do not document the monitoring of psychotropic medications for side effects or effectiveness unless the involved resident has a behavior intervention record, but they do not use one for all residents on psychotropic medications.
During an interview on 10/5/22 at 2:42 P.M., Nurse #2 said Resident #179 was on Zoloft, but she was not aware of any behaviors or mood dysfunctions that the Resident suffers from, as there was no behavior intervention record available for this Resident. She said she does not have any way to monitor the effectiveness of the antidepressant, nor was there a system in place to consistently monitor the Resident for potential signs and symptoms of adverse effects from his/her psychotropic medication.
During an interview on 10/6/22 at 12:24 P.M., the Director of Nurses said there is no process in place in which the nurses monitor for the effectiveness of psychotropic medications. She said behavior sheets are used on a short-term basis for residents who are exhibiting a behavior and not necessarily correlated with the prescribed psychotropic medications. She said there is no process in place for the nurses to document the monitoring of the residents for potential adverse effects to their prescribed psychotropic medications.
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs to promote or maintain the residents' highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being, according to the facility's policy for five Residents (#13, #22, #25, #19, and #179), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Residents #13, #22, #25, #19, and #179, to ensure resident specific, targeted behaviors and potential adverse consequences of use were monitored for the use of psychotropic medications as required.
Findings include:
1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including major depressive disorder.
Review of the October 2022 Physician's Orders indicated:
-Sertraline 25 milligrams (mg) once a day for major depressive disorder (7/26/22)
The Physician's order failed to include monitoring of targeted behaviors, signs/symptoms of adverse consequences for the use of the antidepressant medication as required.
Review of August, September, and October 2022 Medication Administration Records (MAR) indicated Sertraline was administered as ordered by the physician.
Further review of the medical record failed to indicate that staff monitored resident specific, targeted signs/symptoms/behaviors to ascertain the efficacy of psychotropic medications administered to treat depression.
2. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including major depressive disorder.
Review of the October 2022 Physician's Orders indicated:
-Sertraline 25 mg, two tablets once a morning for major depressive disorder (4/10/20)
Review of August, September and October 2022 MARs indicated Sertraline was administered as ordered by the physician.
The physician's order failed to include monitoring of targeted behaviors, signs/symptoms of adverse consequences for the use of the antidepressant medication as required.
Further review of the medical record failed to indicate that staff monitored resident specific, targeted signs/symptoms/behaviors to ascertain the efficacy of psychotropic medications administered to treat depression.
3. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including generalized anxiety disorder.
Review of the October 2022 Physician's Orders indicated
-Sertraline 25 mg once a day for generalized anxiety disorder (1/31/22)
Review of August, September and October 2022 MARs indicated Sertraline was administered as ordered by the physician.
The physician's order failed to include monitoring of targeted behaviors, signs/symptoms of adverse consequences for the use of the psychotropic medication as required.
Further review of the medical record failed to indicate that staff monitored resident specific, targeted signs/symptoms/behaviors to ascertain the efficacy of psychotropic medications administered to treat anxiety.
During an interview on 10/5/22 at 3:35 P.M., Nurse #1 said residents' behaviors are only monitored for the first two weeks they are on a new psychotropic medication, and signs/symptoms of potential side effects of the medication are not monitored but should be.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medications/treatments used in the facility were safely and securely stored in accordance with currently accepted professional pri...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medications/treatments used in the facility were safely and securely stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on two of two units in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:
1. medications were properly stored in locked compartments and not left on top of a medication cart on Unit 3; and
2. the Unit 4 clean utility room which contained an unlocked treatment cart was secured.
Findings include:
1. On 10/4/22 at 1:57 P.M. on Unit 4 (secured unit/Memory Impaired), the surveyor approached a closed door labeled clean utility. The door had a numerical combination lock on it, but the door was not pulled tight and secured and was easily pushed open.
The room contained an unlocked treatment cart. The drawers of treatment cart contained:
-Drawer #1: two boxes of zinc oxide skin protectant ointment, two boxes of hemorrhoidal ointment, two tubes moisture barrier antifungal cream, one bottle of skin prep spray.
-Drawer #3: one bottle of fecal occult blood developing solution
-Drawer #4: one box of Bacitracin Zinc antibiotic ointment
Shelves in the clean utility room contained:
-one box of 144 packets of Bacitracin antibiotic ointment
-four boxes of zinc oxide ointment
-30 packets of white petroleum skin protectant
During an interview on 10/4/22 at 2:08 P.M., the surveyor showed Nurse #1 the unsecured clean utility room door. Nurse #1 pushed open the door and said the room is supposed to be locked at all times.
2. On 10/20/22 at 12:22 P.M. on Unit 3, the surveyor observed a medication cart positioned against the Nursing station desk (opposite side that faces the unit dining room). There were 26 medication cards filled with prescription medication, two boxes of inhalers and a bag filled with medications and treatments on top of the medication cart. The surveyor observed Nurse #2 and a Certified Nursing Assistant in the unit dining room approximately 30 feet away from the medication cart. The line of sight from the dining room to the medication cart was obstructed by walls surrounding the nursing station. At 12:24, Nurse #2 approached the surveyor at the medication cart and said that she had to change out an oxygen tank for a resident seated in the dining room. She said that before changing the oxygen tank she should have either locked the medications in the cart or brought them to the medication room.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review, review of the QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) Policies and Procedures, review of the QAPI Annual Plan, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, review of the QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) Policies and Procedures, review of the QAPI Annual Plan, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that its QAPI plans and procedures identified problematic clinical issues, such as falls, and failed to implement effective strategies in accordance with its QAPI Program, to correct or minimize the risk of falls and injury.
Findings include:
Review of the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement, dated 1/22/2013, indicated the Design and Scope of the QAPI program will be ongoing & comprehensive, dealing with the full range of services offered by the facility, including all departments. When fully implemented, the program will address all systems of care & management practices, & will include clinical care, quality of life, & resident choice. The QAPI policy further indicated that Our goal is safety & high quality with all clinical interventions while emphasizing autonomy & choice in daily life for residents (or resident's agents). Our plan utilizes the best available evidence to define & measure goals.
During the course of the recertification survey from 10/4/22 to 10/20/22, the facility was identified as having multiple residents who had experienced a significant number of falls, some unwitnessed, and some with significant injury to include fractures and lacerations as noted below.
Record review indicated that from 5/7/22 (QAPI COVID-19 waiver lifted) to 10/20/22, there were a total of 14 falls as indicated below:
In June 2022, one resident fell and sustained a head laceration.
In July 2022, three residents experienced a total of four falls. One resident had two falls. One resident sustained a fractured cervical vertebrae.
In August 2022, one resident experienced 2 falls, both on the same day.
In September 2022, two residents experienced one fall each. One of two residents sustained head trauma and received 12 sutures for a right ear laceration.
In October 2022, five resident experienced a fall.
During an interview on 10/7/22 at 1:00 P.M., the surveyor reviewed the Facility's Annual QAPI Plan with the Administrator. The Administrator said monthly and quarterly meetings are held to discuss areas of concern and topics included but was not limited to:
-Resident incidents
-Quality and Safety Measures
Further review of the QAPI Annual Plan (monthly and quarterly meetings), from 5/2022 to 10/2022, indicated, The annual QAPI work plan will be created with an effort to include initiatives from different domains to reflect a global approach to quality improvement. Domains listed in the QAPI work plan included Fall prevention &/or fall with injury.
The facility was unable to provide information to support that falls had been reviewed by the QAPI committee.
During an interview on 10/7/22 at 10:21 A.M., the Administrator said the facility's QAPI program/plan had not developed strategies, or identified a Root Cause Analysis, to address the significant number of resident falls identified by the survey team, or a documented plan (Performance Improvement Plan) to reduce/minimize falls/injury to residents in the future.
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
2. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in September 2010 with diagnoses that included degenerative disease of the nervous system and dementia.
During an observation with interview on 10/4/22 at ...
Read full inspector narrative →
2. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in September 2010 with diagnoses that included degenerative disease of the nervous system and dementia.
During an observation with interview on 10/4/22 at 11:25 A.M., Resident #2 said staff are not brushing his/her teeth to his/her liking. The surveyor observed the Resident to have obvious plaque buildup on broken decaying teeth. The Resident said he/she sees someone from dentistry routinely.
Review of the medical record indicated the Resident was seen by the dentist on 3/24/22, 6/18/22, and 4/15/22, and all three documented visits indicated the Resident had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth.
Review of the most recent MDS under section L, Oral dental status, did not accurately reflect Resident #2's dental condition as documented by the dentist.
During an interview on 10/6/22 at 2:23 P.M., the MDS nurse reviewed the dentist evaluation sheets and said the MDS should have indicated: obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth, but it did not.
Based on observation and interview the facility failed for two Residents (#13 and #2), out of a total sample of 16 residents, to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the Residents' status.
Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:
1. For Resident #13, section O of the MDS for Hospice services was accurately documented; and
2. For Resident #2, section L of the MDS for dental status was accurate.
Findings include:
1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses including sepsis.
Review of the 7/18/22 MDS assessment section O indicated Resident #13 received Hospice services and had a condition or chronic disease that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months (requires Physician documentation).
Review of the medical record failed to indicate Physician documentation that Resident #13 had a condition or chronic disease that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months.
Further review of the medical record indicated the Resident receives Registered Nursing visits twice a month from a volunteer organization in the community and does not receive Hospice services.
During an interview on 10/06/22 at 12:10 P.M., the Director of Nursing said Resident #13 receives twice monthly Registered Nurse visits from a volunteer program in the community and does not receive Hospice services. She said the MDS was inaccurate.