Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center holds a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerns. It ranks #217 out of 422 facilities in Michigan, placing it in the bottom half of the state, but it is the second-ranked facility in Crawford County, meaning there is only one local option that performs better. The facility is improving, having reduced issues from 14 in 2024 to 6 in 2025. Staffing is a notable strength with a 4 out of 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 0%, well below the state average, which helps ensure consistent care. However, it has incurred $27,600 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 80% of Michigan facilities, suggesting recurring compliance issues. Specific incidents include a critical finding where a resident's pressure ulcer worsened significantly due to inadequate care, leading to hospitalization, and concerns about food safety practices that could pose risks to residents.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Michigan
- #217/422
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $27,600 in fines. Lower than most Michigan facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 78 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Michigan nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Michigan average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
This deficient practice pertains to intake 2588223.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and readily detect an elopement for one Resident (#1) of three residents reviewe...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0551
(Tag F0551)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#185) of one resident reviewed for end-of-life care (EOLC) had a care plan and physician's order for terminal care, an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessments and documentation warr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) were reviewed, address...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of target behaviors/symptoms with attempted us...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control measures to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for five Residents (#5, #10, #2...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
14 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the abuse policy and investigate allegations of abuse for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to add...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer supplemental oxygen per physician orders for one Resident (#186) of one residents reviewed for respiratory care.
F...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and manage pain for one Resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for pain management. This deficient practice resulted i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately conduct a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for a psychotropic medication for one Resident (R23) of five residents reviewed for un...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than five percent, with two errors identified out of 31 opportunities, a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #186 (R186):
A review of the facility census revealed R186 was sent to an acute care hospital with the primary diagnosi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** R186
An observation on 7/3/2024 at 8:10 a.m., revealed R186 in a wheelchair, self-propelling toward the nurses' station on the E...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) information to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid). This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that included development, monitoring, and evaluation of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) attended the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings on a quarterly basis. Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
This citation will have two deficient practice statements: A and B
A. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement a system for recording and tracking communicable disease dur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified Infection Preventionist worked at least part-time at the facility and was present to properly assess, implement, and man...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent, assess, treat, and avoid worsening of a pres...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete assessments to determine the need for bed rails for four Residents (#22, #23, #24, #27) of four residents reviewed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $27,600 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 22 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $27,600 in fines. Higher than 94% of Michigan facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Michigan, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center Staffed?
CMS rates Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center?
State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 21 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center?
Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 39 certified beds and approximately 25 residents (about 64% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Grayling, Michigan.
How Does Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center Compare to Other Michigan Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Michigan, Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1 and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Michigan. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center Stick Around?
Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center Ever Fined?
Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center has been fined $27,600 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Michigan average of $33,355. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center on Any Federal Watch List?
Munson Healthcare Crawford Continuing Care Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.