Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Facility has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for care, but there are areas for improvement. It ranks #4 out of 422 facilities in Michigan, placing it in the top half, and is the best option in Arenac County. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 7 in 2024 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, boasting a 5-star rating with only 7% turnover, significantly lower than the state average, and it has more registered nurse coverage than 98% of facilities in Michigan. However, the facility has incurred $32,175 in fines, which is a concern as it is higher than 88% of Michigan facilities, suggesting some compliance issues. Specific incidents include a resident developing pressure ulcers due to inadequate care, another resident falling and sustaining a head injury due to a lack of fall prevention measures, and a third resident suffering burns from hot coffee due to being left unsupervised. While there are solid strengths in staffing and overall ratings, these serious incidents highlight critical areas that need attention.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Michigan
- #4/422
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 7% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 41 points below Michigan's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $32,175 in fines. Lower than most Michigan facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 119 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Michigan nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 20 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (7%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (7%)
41 points below Michigan average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 20 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a call bell communication device was responded to for two residents (#9, #72), of 22 sampled residents, resulting ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide for safe wheelchair transport for two resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for psychotrop...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility Failed to 1) Ensure that kitchen food items are dated with received by dates and use by dates and 2) Ensure that foods brought into the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
7 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of facility-acquired pressure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures to ensure that appropriate n...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for psychotrop...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label food items with Use by dates, resulting in an increased likelihood for food borne illness with hospitalization and poten...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical staff posting of licensed and un-licensed staff was completed daily and posted with accurate and complete data...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00140583.
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to en...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of 1 resident (Resident #70) who wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions and supervision fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to clean a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0712
(Tag F0712)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely physician visits for Resident #8, resulting in 70 day...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one resident ( Resident #10 for Benadryl usage) was fre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Resident #1,Resident #8), o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food preparation and kitchen equipment were maintained in a sanitary manner and in good working condition, resulti...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Analyze 12/22/22 and 01/23/23 monthly resident infections, 2) Ensure that one resident's (Resident #9) private room refrige...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 7% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 41 points below Michigan's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s), $32,175 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 20 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $32,175 in fines. Higher than 94% of Michigan facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
About This Facility
What is Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Michigan, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci Staffed?
CMS rates Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 7%, compared to the Michigan average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci?
State health inspectors documented 20 deficiencies at Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm, 15 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci?
Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ASCENSION HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 29 certified beds and approximately 23 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Standish, Michigan.
How Does Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci Compare to Other Michigan Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Michigan, Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (7%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Michigan. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci Stick Around?
Staff at Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 7%, the facility is 39 percentage points below the Michigan average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci Ever Fined?
Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci has been fined $32,175 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Michigan average of $33,401. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci on Any Federal Watch List?
Ascension Standish Hospital & Skilled Nursing Faci is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.