Good Samaritan Society - Woodland
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Good Samaritan Society - Woodland in Brainerd, Minnesota has a Trust Grade of B, which indicates it is a solid choice among nursing homes. It ranks #118 out of 337 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 3 in Crow Wing County, suggesting only one local option is better. The facility's trend is stable, as they reported one issue in both 2024 and 2025, which shows consistency in their operations. Staffing is a strong point here, with a 4/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 42%, which is on par with the state average, indicating that staff remain relatively stable. There have been no fines recorded, showing good compliance with regulations. However, there are some concerns. The facility had a serious incident where a resident fell while trying to transfer independently due to delayed toileting assistance, resulting in a head injury that required emergency care. Additionally, there were findings of delayed meal assistance for some residents who needed help during dining, which could impact their overall experience. While the facility has good RN coverage, with more RN support than 83% of Minnesota facilities, these incidents suggest room for improvement in resident care responsiveness.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Minnesota
- #118/337
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near Minnesota's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Minnesota facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 72 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Minnesota nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ✓ Good
- Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below Minnesota average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Minnesota avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff responded to resident request for toile...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure timely toileting assistance for 1 of 1 reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely meal assistance to promote a dignifie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to reduce the risk for the spread of herpes simplex virus for 1 of 1 resident (R10) identi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Minnesota facilities.
- • 42% turnover. Below Minnesota's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 4 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Good Samaritan Society - Woodland's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Good Samaritan Society - Woodland an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Minnesota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Good Samaritan Society - Woodland Staffed?
CMS rates Good Samaritan Society - Woodland's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Minnesota average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Good Samaritan Society - Woodland?
State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at Good Samaritan Society - Woodland during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 3 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Good Samaritan Society - Woodland?
Good Samaritan Society - Woodland is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 40 certified beds and approximately 38 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BRAINERD, Minnesota.
How Does Good Samaritan Society - Woodland Compare to Other Minnesota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Minnesota, Good Samaritan Society - Woodland's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Good Samaritan Society - Woodland?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Good Samaritan Society - Woodland Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Good Samaritan Society - Woodland has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Minnesota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Good Samaritan Society - Woodland Stick Around?
Good Samaritan Society - Woodland has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Minnesota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Good Samaritan Society - Woodland Ever Fined?
Good Samaritan Society - Woodland has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Good Samaritan Society - Woodland on Any Federal Watch List?
Good Samaritan Society - Woodland is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.