CRITICAL
(L)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Kitchen
On 1/21/25, at 9:32 a.m., during a brief initial tour with the interim culinary director (CD)-A and the certified dietar...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Kitchen
On 1/21/25, at 9:32 a.m., during a brief initial tour with the interim culinary director (CD)-A and the certified dietary manager (CDM), an observation was made of completion of the dishwashing process. At that time, the temperatures for the morning cycle temperature check had not been logged. Dietary aide (DA)-B stated the wash temp was 150 degrees Fahrenheit, and the rinse temp was one hundred and eighty five-ish. DA-B stated the temperatures were to be 160 for wash, and 180 for the rinse cycle. Although able to state the desired temperatures for the wash and rinse cycle, DA-B stated she was unaware the temperatures were to be up to the desired temperatures before starting the dishwashing process and was unaware there were further interventions indicated if the machines did not reach the desired temperatures. CDM, who was present during the observation and interview, stated it appeared that staff were unaware of the need to run two or more racks through to bring the temperatures up to the desired temperatures prior to starting the dishwashing cycle, and instructed DA-B on this process. CDM stated if the dishwashing machine was not up to the required temperature when checked, the dishwasher would have to be run until the temp was up to the desired temp. If the temperature still did not get to the desired temp, the facility would have to reach out to the company and request a service call. CD stated if this could not be corrected, the facility would use the three section sink for cleaning of pots and pans, and implement use of Styrofoam plates.
On 1/22/25, at 1:52 p.m. during a follow up observation, DA-C was observed as they completed the dishwashing process. A review of the recorded temperatures indicated the temp check for the wash temperature was 175, while the rinse cycle was at 178 degrees Fahrenheit. DA-C stated they were unaware of the need to run the racks through until the temperature met the desired temperatures of 160 for the wash cycle and 180 for the rinse cycle. CD-A was present and provided instruction to DA-C.
A review of the dishwasher temps was completed for the period of 12/12/24 to 1/21/25. The facility documentation lacked logged results for the period of 1/1/25 through 1/7/25 (42 opportunities for documentation were missed during this time period).
The wash temperature was below the desired range on 36 occasions during the period of 12/12/24 to 1/21/25.
The facility also lacked documentation for wash temperature checks on 27 opportunities during this period. This total, including the missing documentation for 1/1/25-1/7/25, would be 48 incidents when wash temperatures were not recorded.
The rinse temperature was below the desired range of 180 degrees Fahrenheit on 10 occasions during the period of 12/12/24 to 1/14/25.
The facility also lacked documentation for rinse temperature checks on 28 opportunities during this period. This total, including the missing documentation for 1/1/25-1/7/25, was 49 occasions where rinse temperatures were not recorded.
On 1/23/25, at 8:50 a.m. the service representative (SR) for the dishwasher was present for a service call. At this time, the wash and rinse temps were checked three times. SR stated the required temp for washing of dishes was 160 degrees. SR went on to state The final rinse temperature can be no lower than one hundred and eighty degrees. SR stated it was recommended to run the dishwashing racks through a couple of times to get the temperature up to the appropriate temperature. SR stated the water has to be that hot (180 degree rinse temperature) to kill the bacteria, and stated If not sanitized properly, technically you're not washing. SR stated the potential implication of not having the correct temperatures at 180 degrees Fahrenheit was: People can get sick. That's the whole point of sanitizing.
On 1/23/25, at 9:04 a.m. a review of the current logs was completed with CDM. CDM stated it appeared staff were not aware to run the dishwasher racks through the machine two or more times to get up to temperature. CDM stated the purpose of monitoring temperatures was to ensure the dishwasher was operating correctly, to ensure that the dishes were cleaned and sanitized. CDM went on to state: If the dishes were not sanitized, and if the dishes were not clean, there was a risk, potential risk, for illness. CDM stated currently in the facility, she was aware of the presence of COVID and influenza, however, was unaware of any residents with Norovirus. CDM stated there were residents with Norovirus prior to January of 2025. CDM stated she was unaware of the length of time Norovirus could remain on dishes if not cleaned properly.
On 1/23/25, at 9:54 a.m., CD stated he was not aware of any residents who required special precautions at this time. CD stated dietary is notified by the infection preventionist of any new illnesses, and if they need to use paper products to eliminate cross contamination.
On 1/23/25, at 2:43 p.m., an email, dated 12/27/24 at 8:39 a.m., sent by the CD, was provided by the IP and administrator. The email stated In the event of instances like Norovirus that we have/had in the TCU, we would be using disposable items for meals wherever applicable. The email went on to state This reduces the amount of contact with items amongst the teams. As this surveyor had been told earlier by the CDM and CD there were no current cases which required disposable items, this was clarified with IP and administrator. The IP stated there was one case of Norovirus in the facility. IP stated use of disposable products was implemented when Norovirus was suspected. IP went on to state there were four total rooms where disposable dishes were being used. IP stated this was implemented upon suspicion of Norovirus. IP went on to state she was in contact with the CDM and CD and they were aware of people using paper products. Although paper products were implemented for those four residents as outlined by IP, the paper products were delivered on plastic trays, which were washed through the communal dishwasher.
On 1/24/25, at 10:13 a.m., surveyor stopped at the receptionist desk for directions. At that time, surveyor observed a credit card scanner on the counter top, and asked it's function. The receptionist stated it was for employees to pay for their meals when they eat the facility food.
Policies
The facility Standing Orders for Skilled Nursing Facilities, revised 2023, identified facility to complete COVID-19 PCR, NAAT, Influenza/RSV/COVID-19 PCR, and/or antigen testing as indicated for outbreak and/or routine testing per facility policy. If a resident is symptomatic: completed rapid COVID-19/Flu A&B, COVID-19 PCR, NAAT, Influenza/RSV/COVID-19 PCR, and/or antigen testing.
The facility Principles for Screening Staff Illness, undated, identified staff having active symptoms (fever, significant coughing, uncontrolled sneezing, runny nose, diarrhea, and vomiting) should not work.
Types of Illness:
Respiratory illnesses - including cough, congestion, fever, chills, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, and runny nose. (Diarrhea, nausea or vomiting can also present with COVID-19 infections.) Staff should not work until return-to-work screening criteria have been met. If staff has respiratory symptoms and does not comply with testing, they may return to work on day 11 after onset of symptoms.
GI Illnesses -vomiting and/or diarrhea symptoms should not work with active symptoms.
Sore throat - sore throat that does not resolve in 48 hours and COVID and influenza have been reasonably ruled out, strep testing is recommended.
Return to work protocol:
- Staff with improving or mild respiratory symptoms and no fever for 24-hours without fever reducing medications can return to work after two negative rapid antigen tests 48-hours apart or return to work or stay at work with one negative NAAT. Since influenza symptoms are similar to COVID, if influenza is suspected either from known exposure or a negative COVID test but significant symptoms exist, conduct rapid influenza/COVID-19 test. If negative, employee may return to work when symptoms improve.
- Influenza Positive: Seven (7) after onset of infection, no fever for 24 hours without fever reducing medications, and improving symptoms.
- GI Illness: Forty-eight (48) hours after no active symptoms (vomiting and diarrhea) * and no fever for 24 hours without fever modification medication. Norovirus outbreak, Nursing is 72-hours. In general, dietary staff 72 hours after GI symptoms end before returning to work.
- Sore throat: Improvement of symptoms. If sore throat does not improve within 48-hours suggest negative strep test, if positive strep test 24-hours on antibiotics. (MDH is 24-hours and CDC is 12-hours).
- In general, infectious bacterial infections being treated with antibiotics- staff can return after 24 hours of starting antibiotics. Some serious infections may require longer antibiotic treatment before being deemed noncontagious.
- GACC adheres to CDC and MDH guidelines for return-to-work protocol.
The facility Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions policy, date 1/25, identified standard and transmission precautions will be used for residents in standard care and who are documented or suspected to have an infection or communicable diseases that may be transmitted to others.
The organization is compliant with standard transmission-based precautions as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- Purpose is to decrease the risk of cross-contamination to other residents, staff, volunteers and visitors.
- Standard Precautions are practices to reduce healthcare associated infections are used with all patients, regardless of diagnosis or isolation status, and apply to interacting with blood, body fluids, secretions, and excretions except sweat, regardless of whether they contain visible blood, non-intact skin and mucous membranes. The required elements include:
Adequate hand hygiene at all appropriate times.
- Disinfecting surfaces and equipment between patient uses.
- Appropriate use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (e.g., gowns, gloves, mask, eye protection) for reasonably anticipated contact with body substances or contaminated equipment. Standard Precautions take into consideration the task being performed, e.g. gloves and mask with face shield for emptying drainage bags.
- Safe injection practices.
- Respiratory Hygiene/Cough Etiquette.
Transmission-based precautions are used for residents who are documented to have or suspected to have an infection or communicable disease where transmission cannot be controlled using standard precautions alone. Transmission-based precautions are used in addition to standard precautions. The type and duration of precautions is determined by referencing the CDC's Type and Duration of Precautions Recommended for Selected Infections and Conditions, or other CDC recommendations for diseases and conditions not listed in the recommendations section.
The six types of transmission-based isolation include:
- Contact Precautions: gloves and gowns when entering resident room. Use of mask, eye protection/face shield as needed.
- Enteric Contact Precautions: gloves and gown when entering resident room. Wash hands with soap and water and use bleach (or disinfectant specific for enteric virus) for cleaning surfaces.
- Droplet Precautions: gloves and gowns when entering resident room. Use of mask, eye protection/face shield as needed.
- Special Contact and Droplet Precautions: gloves. gowns, fit-tested, NISOSH approved N95 or higher-level respirator and eye protection.
- Enhanced Barrier - gown and gloves during high-contact resident cares due to indwelling devices, wounds, and/or MDROs status
- Airborne Precautions gloves, gowns, fit-tested, NI [NAME] approved N95 or higher-level respirator (or PAPR) and eye protection - these residents require immediate transport to a level of care that can appropriately care for airborne infectious disease (ex. TB).
Isolation:
- Post a notice on the door of the resident's door of isolation.
- Post appropriate precautions sign.
- Provide isolation cart with necessary PPE outside resident room.
Visitors should be discouraged from visiting when the visitor has an infectious condition.
All staff that has contact with the resident(s) will be in serviced on appropriate
Precautions.
Gloves and Handwashing
- In addition to wearing gloves as outlined under Universal/Standard Precautions, wear gloves (clean, nonsterile) when entering the room.
- During the course of caring for a resident, change gloves after having contact with infectious material that may contain high concentrations of microorganisms (i.e. fecal material and wound drainage).
- Gloves should be used for handling of all laundry of infected resident.
- Remove gloves before leaving the room and cleanse hands immediately in accordance with the hand hygiene policy and procedure.
- After glove removal and hand hygiene, ensure that hands do not touch potentially contaminated environmental surfaces or items in the resident's room.
Gown
- In addition to wearing a gown as outlined in Universal/Standard Precautions, wear a gown (clean, nonsterile) when entering the room if it is anticipated that clothing will have substantial contact with the resident, environmental surfaces, or items in the resident's room, or if the resident is incontinent, has diarrhea, an ileostomy, a colostomy, or wound drainage not contained by a dressing.
- Remove the gown before leaving the residents' room.
- After gown removal, ensure that clothing does not contact potentially contaminated surfaces.
The Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, and Administer are responsible for monitoring cross-contamination, need for prophylactic treatment (e.g. Tamiflu). and reporting requirements for MDH.
The facility Infection Control policy, dated 1/25, identified signs and symptoms of infections will be promptly recognized by staff, documented, and communicated to the medical provider teams. Employees will follow accepted standards to decrease risk of organism transmission/cross-contamination including use of personal protection equipment (PPE), universal/standard precautions and isolation precautions. All nursing staff will be made aware of antibiotic stewardship to avoid Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs). Treatment/reporting procedures will be consistent with regulatory requirements per Federal and State guidelines.
Purpose is to ensure all staff are aware of/familiar with infection control protocol at GACC.
Recognize Infection:
- Staff will use available resources will identify infections and initiate steps to treat.
- Monitor vital signs, assess physical and mental changes in condition.
Use disease specific assessment skills, i.e., respiratory assessment must include TPR, B/P, oxygen saturation, use of accessory muscles of respiration, lung sounds, resident's color, presence/absence of sputum - sputum color.
Document findings
Communicate assessment of findings to physician for determination of treatment.
Surveillance:
- Provide procedures with ongoing review for accepted standards to reduce transmission of infections.
- Monitor antibiotic use to meet guidelines established.
- Monthly review of patterns and trends by unit.
- Residents will not be admitted with active infection, i.e. influenza, Tuberculosis, Ebola, SARS. No availability of negative pressure isolation room.
- Resident placement to minimize exposure - considerations: private room, cohabitation, double room with limited ability to cross contaminate (c diff, MRSA).
- Posting of signs in facility to remind staff and visitors of infection standards. Initiate as needed restrictions to facility or nursing wings. Sample sign STOP! Help Protect Our Residents
- Environmental cleaning and disinfection of equipment/supplies by departments procedures.
- Proper use and provision of personal protection equipment.
Isolation Precautions
- Designated cart with supplies is located in the employee education room.
- Hazardous waste removal to designated location-300 wing north hall and 500 wing.
TRAINING OF STAFF I EMPLOYEE HEALTH
- Staff training provided at orientation, annually, and ad hoc.
- Annual offering of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines to staff.
- Annual questionnaire for Tuberculosis screening.
- Refer to /Cross reference with facility's Exposure Control Plan.
REPORTING
- Staff will complete infection control report when infection identified.
- ICC nurse will submit monthly compilation report to DON, along with any identified trends.
- Infection statistics and trends will be documented on QA reports with presentation at scheduled meetings.
- Employee health infections/trends are tracked. Any transmission to residents will be communicated
- Infection control reports per clinical software, review for unnecessary use of antibiotics.
- Determine as needed reportability to Minnesota Department of Health
The facility Surveillance for Infections policy, dated 1/25, identified the infection preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcome and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions.
The purpose of the surveillance of infections is to identify both individual cases and trends of epidemiologically significant organisms and healthcare-associated infections, to guide appropriate interventions, and to prevent future infections.
The criteria for such infections are based on the current standard definitions of infections.
Infections that will be included in routine surveillance include those with:
- evidence of transmissibility in a healthcare environment.
- available processes and procedures that prevent or reduce the spread of infection.
- clinically significant morbidity or mortality associated with infection (e.g., pneumonia, UTl's, C. difficile); and
- pathogens associated with serious outbreaks. (e.g., invasive Streptococcus Group A, acute viral hepatitis, norovirus, scabies, influenza, COVID-19).
Infections that may be considered in surveillance include those with limited transmissibility in a healthcare environment; and/or limited prevention strategies.
Nursing staff will monitor residents for signs and symptoms that may suggest infection, according to current criteria and definitions of infections, and will document and report suspected infections to the charge nurse as soon as possible.
If a communicable disease outbreak is suspected, this information will be communicated to Nurse Manager and infection preventionist immediately.
When infection or colonization with epidemiologically important organisms is suspected, cultures may be sent, if appropriate, to a contracted laboratory for identification or confirmation. Cultures will be further screened for sensitivity to antimicrobial medications to help determine treatment measures.
Staff nurse will notify the attending physician and the infection preventionist of suspected infections.
- The infection preventionist and the attending physician will determine if laboratory tests are indicated, and whether special precautions are warranted.
- The infection preventionist will determine if the infection is reportable.
- The attending physician and interdisciplinary team will determine the treatment plan for the resident.
If transmission-based precautions or other preventative measures are implemented to slow or stop the spread of infection, the infection preventionist will collect data to help determine the effectiveness of such measures.
When transmission of healthcare-associated infections continues despite documented efforts to implement infection control and prevention measures, the appropriate state agency and/or a specialist in infection control and epidemiology will be consulted for further recommendations.
A facility policy, Dishwasher Temperature, undated, indicated the purpose of monitoring the dishwasher temperature was to ensure that proper infection control, cleaning and sanitizing of all dishware is achieved while using the automatic dish machine. The policy statement identified: The automatic dish machine will reach the appropriate temperature prior to washing and sanitizing to meet the guidelines.
The procedure outlined prior to washing the dishes, the dish machine will be turned on and run through the cycles to identify wash and rinse temperatures. The procedure identified the wash cycle will reach and minimum temperature of 160 degrees and rinse cycle will reach and maintain a minimum temperature of 180 degrees. The procedure identified the dish machine will be monitored at each meal period to ensure proper wash and rinse temperatures are reached. If the temperature was below the specified temperatures for the wash and rinse cycle, the Engineering department will be notified immediately. The procedure went on to state dishes will not be washed until the dish machine reaches the appropriate temperature. The procedure further goes on to identify If needed, disposable dishes will be used until the proper repairs can be made, and the three-compartment sink method will be used for pots and pans.
The policy lacked direction to staff to run multiple racks prior to starting the process to bring the cycles up to the desired rinse cycles prior to starting the dishwashing process. Additionally, the policy lacked instruction to the staff to record the temperatures obtained on the dishwasher temperature logs upon obtaining the temperatures.
The manufacturer manual from American Dish Service for Model ADC-44 High Temp Conveyor Dishmachines [sic], last revised 4/28/21, was received from the facility. The manual indicated the requirement at the dishmachine is 180 F (degrees Fahrenheit). The manual identified for high temp sanitizing, the measurement is taken at the manifold for a minimum of 180 F, not in or at the sprays. The manual indicated the temperature for hot water sanitizing in the wash cycle should be 160 F and 180 F for the rinse cycle for the hot water sanitizing.
The IJ that began on 1/21/25 was removed on 1/24/25 when it was verified through observation, interview and docuement review, the facility implemented the following:
1.
108 out of 108 residents were audited for respiratory and GI symptoms. Any residents that were identified as suspected illness were placed on the appropriate precautions based on symptoms per CBC/MDH guidelines.
2.
Revised and educated staff on the infection control policy to include updated signs and symptoms, HER order sets, timing of residents being placed on isolation precautions, staff attesting to absence of respiratory and GI symptoms, partnership with culinary and IP. Infection control policy included implementation of isolation by clinical staff upon identification of onset of respiratory and/or GI symptoms.
3.
Revised the dish machine temperature log and dish machine temperature log and operations expectations policy. Per the current policy and procedure identified on the dish machine log, indicated instructions are outlines if temperatures are not reached on who to contact until the machine can properly function. Disposable dishes will be used until repairs are made. Culinary staff are trained on expectations and policy.
4.
Implementation of episodic monitoring of residents during outbreak periods will be initiated every shift utilizing an outbreak monitoring order set. Order set will be completed by nursing in the EMAR. Order set for outbreak monitoring will include supplementary documentation for respiratory or GI illness dependent on the outbreak.
5.
New notification process for dietary of GI illness. A new form was developed and trained upon to ensure communication between clinical and dietary staff related to any GI illness updates to ensure appropriate meal delivery takes place. Dietary will receive the new form from clinical and process the request. New meal delivery process will be initiated for the resident identified by clinical. Tray cards will be updated with the new information. This will not be discontinued until IP or designee communicates removal with dietary department. IP will upload a note in PCC.
6.
Updated process for monitoring employee illness and return to work status. Per the new employee illness policy and procedure, staff are unable to return to work until they are cleared by Infection Preventionist, HR, or designee based on CDC guidelines.
7.
Based on updated communication posters that are posted on resident rooms by clinicians as needed, and following updated education for all staff, staff are being instructed to read and follow the guidelines displayed on the posters. Administrator or designee will continue to notify all staff on outbreaks within the facility.
8.
Continue to track on MDH surveillance log while ensuring no gaps and continued auditing of surveillance log by Infection Preventionist or designee. Auditing will be conducted by DON or designee.
9.
All staff within the community, regardless of roles and departments, will be educated on precautions, appropriate PPE, and regular hand hygiene. Routine audits will be conducted to ensure compliance and addressed at quarterly QAPI.
10.
Staff education on infection control practices, policies and procedures that related to Norovirus and Influenza A outbreaks, improper dishwasher sanitation, and appropriate PPE usage had been implemented.
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to implement infection control strategies for respiratory protection to mitigate the risk and spread of Influenza A and norovirus. In addition, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were implemented to reduce the spread of Norovirus when the dishwasher temperature did not rise high enough to sanitize the dishes during the norovirus outbreak. As a result, the facility developed an influenza outbreak which included three residents (R26, R29, and R71) who tested positive for Influenza A, and two residents who were suspected to have Influenza A (R54, and R216) as well as 10 residents (R87, R207, R346, R54, R84, R85, R23, R205, R216 and R209) who showed signs and symptoms and/or were confirmed to have norovirus. The facility failed to ensure 12 of 12 employees, (registered nurse (RN)-E, cook (C)-A, dietary aide (DA)-D, laundry aide (LA)-B, nursing assistant (NA)-D, housekeeping aide (HA)-C, DA-E, NA-E, RN-F, NA-F, NA-G, and NA-H) who displayed signs and symptoms of potential Norovirus were restricted from and returned to work per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria. This resulted in a system wide failure in infection control procedures to prevent the spread of illness within the facility to vulnerable residents and the staff of the facility resulting in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) which placed all 108 residents at a high likelihood to for serious illness and/or death by contracting a communicable disease, including but not limited to Norovirus and/or Influenza.
The IJ began on 1/21/25 when R26 was observed to have influenza-like symptoms, and the facility failed to implement appropriate transmission-based precautions to prevent spread of infection and failed to implement infection control surveillance to identify trends or patterns of potential infectious outbreaks. In addition, after the facility placed residents in isolation, staff were observed to not use the appropriate PPE and/or perform appropriate hand hygiene practices. Norovirus outbreak started in December and continued to spread in facility at the time of the recertification survey. The IJ was identified on 1/23/25, and the administrator, director of nursing (DON), director of quality improvement (DQI), infection preventionist (IP) and executive business director were notified of the IJ on 1/23/25 at 5:45 p.m. The IJ was removed on 1/24/25, at 1:45 p.m., when the facility implemented actions to reduce/prevent the spread of illness, including Norovirus and Influenza A. However, noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity, F, widespread, which indicated no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not IJ.
Findings include:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified Influenza is a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat, and lungs. The Interim Guidance for Influenza Outbreak Management in Long-Term Care and Post-Acute Care Facilities, dated 9/17/24, identified when there is influenza activity in the local community, active daily surveillance for influenza illness should be conducted among all new and current residents, healthcare personnel, and visitors of long-term care facilities, and should be continued until the end of influenza season. Healthcare personnel, and visitors who are identified with any illness symptoms should be excluded from the facility until their illness has resolved. Older adults and other long-term care residents, including those who are medically fragile and those with neurological or neurocognitive conditions, may manifest atypical signs and symptoms of influenza virus infection, and may not have fever. Ill residents should be placed on droplet precautions with room restriction and be excluded from participating in group activities. Influenza testing should occur when any resident has signs and symptoms of acute respiratory illness or influenza-like illness.
Implement standard and droplet precautions for all residents with suspected or confirmed influenza. Standard precautions are intended to be applied to the care of all patients in all healthcare settings, regardless of the suspected or confirmed presence of an infectious agent. Implementation of Standard precautions constitute the primary strategy for the prevention of healthcare-associated transmission of infectious agents among patients and healthcare personnel. Standard precautions consist of performing hand hygiene, using personal protective equipment (PPE) whenever there is an expectation of possible exposure to an infection material, follow respiratory hygiene/cough etiquette principles and properly handle, clean and disinfect patient care equipment and instruments/devices. Clean and disinfect the environment appropriately.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified Norovirus as a very contagious virus that causes vomiting and diarrhea, that sometimes is called the stomach flu or the stomach bug; however, norovirus illness is not related to the flu. The flu is caused by the influenza virus. Norovirus causes acute gastroenteritis (inflammation of the stomach or intestines). Most people with norovirus illness get better within one to three days; but they can still spread the virus for a few days after. A person usually develops symptoms 12 to 48 hours after being exposed to norovirus. Most common symptoms: diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, stomach pain with other symptoms that may include fever, headache.
The virus can be introduced into healthcare facilities by infected patients, staff, visitors, or contaminated foods. Compared with healthy people, norovirus illnesses can be more severe and occasionally even deadly in patients in hospitals or long-term care facilities. Anyone can get infected and sick with norovirus and people of all ages get infected during norovirus outbreaks. Older adults and people with weakened immune s[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to provide assist with personal grooming for 1 of 1 residents, (R2), reviewed for personal appearance.
Findings include:
R2's...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to provide assist with personal grooming for 1 of 1 residents, (R2), reviewed for personal appearance.
Findings include:
R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of 11/16/24, identified R2 had brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12. Although classified as moderate cognitive impairment, a score of 13 indicates intact cognition. A listing of R2's medical diagnoses included progressive neurological conditions, cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture), dementia, and multiple sclerosis (MS-a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves which can cause numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes and other symptoms). The MDS indicated R2 had functional limitation of both upper extremities and was fully dependent of staff for all aspects of personal hygiene, including combing her hair, shaving, washing and drying face and hands.
A review of R2's care plan, most recently revised on 6/3/24, indicated R2 had an ADL (activities of daily living-tasks of dressing, grooming, bathing, and mobility) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) cerebral palsy. The care plan directed the staff to provide assist of one to complete personal hygiene. The care plan lacked description of what personal hygiene consisted of for R2. The care plan further identified R2 had a communication problem r/t aphasia (an impairment of person's ability to comprehend or formulate language because of damage to specific brain regions), slow speech, and no teeth. The care plan indicated R2 could be difficult to understand due to this.
During observation and interview on 1/21/25, at 10:47 a.m. R2 was observed seated in her wheelchair in her room, watching television. R2's hair was observed to be neatly pulled back and she was neatly dressed. R2 was observed to have a patch of white whiskers under her chin which was approximately one inch in length, 1/4th inch in width, and 1/4th inch length of whiskers. R2 lacked dentures, and her speech pattern was difficult to understand due to difficulty with projection (ability to speak loudly/clearly) and when asked if she was bothered by her whiskers, R2 nodded her head yes. R2 stated staff offered to assist her with shaving her whiskers once in a while. R2 nodded her head yes when asked if she wanted to have her whiskers shaved by staff.
On 1/23/25, at 12:32 p.m. R2 was observed in her room at this time as she was receiving assistance with her noon meal from nursing assistant (NA)-A. R2 was noted to have whiskers present, without shaving completed. NA-A stated she had provided R2 with assist to complete morning cares. NA-A stated personal grooming was completed by staff, and shaving was generally completed in the morning. NA-A stated she had not completed personal shaving, although acknowledged the whiskers were present and were long. R2 affirmed to NA-A she wished to have her whiskers shaved, and directed NA-A to the lower drawer in her dresser where her razor was stored.
On 1/23/25, at 4:37 p.m. was observed to be up in her chair, watching television. R2 had her hair pulled up on top of her head. Her facial hair had been shaved and R2 appeared neat and well groomed. When asked if it felt good to have shaving completed, R2 responded yeah.
On 1/23/25, at 4:54 p.m. clinical manager (CM)-A stated she was unaware R2 had facial whiskers present, and indicated this should have been addressed with routine morning/evening cares provided by nursing assistants. CM-A stated at times R2 has refused assistance from certain staff, however, stated if that occurred, she would expect staff to request the assistance of another staff member to complete the task. CM-A stated it was important to assist with removal of facial hair for the dignity of the resident. CM-A stated although some residents may not wish to have this completed, R2 would want to have facial hair removed.
The facility policy, Dignity, dated February 2024, identified that each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feeling of self worth and self esteem. The policy indicated when assisted with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights, and are groomed as they wished to be groomed (hair styles, nails, facial hair, etc.).
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the completed quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurat...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the completed quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded to reflect hospice services for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for MDS' accuracy.
Findings include:
The CMS Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2023, identified each section of the MDS along with various instructions how to code and/or complete them. The section labeled, Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, listed directions to record any special treatments or programs the resident received during the specified time period (i.e., assessment reference date; ARD). This included, . Hospice Care, and outlined, Code residents identified as being in a hospice program . where any array of services is provided for the palliation and management of terminal illness .
R15's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified diagnoses included progressive neurological conditions, neurogenic bladder, dementia, Parkinson's disease, depression, and manic disorder. At the time of survey, MDS failed to identify R15 received hospice care in section O- Special Treatments and Programs.
R15's census report, printed 1/24/25, identified R15 was admitted to hospice services on 3/22/24.
During interview on 1/23/25 at 4:36 p.m., director of reimbursement and MDS coordinator verified they had reviewed R15's MDS (dated 12/25/24) and stated hospice care should have been coded adding, That was a coding error.
During interview on 1/24/25 at 2:40 p.m. the director of nursing (DON) stated MDS assessment accuracy was important because it needs to reflect the resident care needs and should be always submitted accurately.
During interview on 1/24/25 at 11:08 a.m., regional clinical director stated facility did not have a policy on MDS and that they follow chapter two of the RAI manual.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician's order for 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician's order for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for bowel management.
Findings include:
R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s except upper body dressing, eating and oral hygiene. R21's diagnoses included neuromyelitis optica, hypertension, multi-drug-resistant organism (MDRO), paraplegia, malnutrition, cutaneous abscess of buttock and osteomyelitis.
During review of R21's electronic medication record (EMR), R21 had an order for senna-docusate sodium oral tablet 8.6-50 mg (milligram) one tablet twice daily to prevent constipation, oxycodone 5 mg one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain, and senna-docusate sodium oral tablet 8.6-50 mg one table by mouth as needed for constipation twice daily - take one or two tablets.
R21's bowel record indicated R21's last bowel movement was on 1/16/25, indicating R21 had not had a bowel movement in six days.
The facilities house standing orders indicated:
Bowel: constipation (perform steps sequentially)
1.
Consider rectal check to determine if impaction is present.
2.
Encourage 2,000 ml (milliliter) daily fluid intake unless contraindicated.
3.
Consult nutrition services for dietary recommendations.
4.
Sennoside 8.6 mg, two tablets PO (my mouth) at HS (bedtime) prn x three days. If no bowel movement in three days - if not results, perform rectal check to determine if impaction is present - If no results within 24 hours, Bisacodyl suppository 10 mg PR (per rectum) daily PRN.
5.
Administer MOM (milk of magnesia) 30 cc (cubic centimeters) (do not use magnesium-based products in patients with renal failure) PM day four if no results reattempt Sennoside 8.6 mg or Bisacodyl if no results after 24 hours and notify provider.
6.
Monitor and record results from treatment.
During review of R21's electronic health record (EHR), EHR lacked evidence of bowel management program being followed for R21.
During interview on 1/21/25 at 1:22 p.m., R21 stated she was constipated due to the pain medication that she had been receiving. R21 stated she received scheduled Senna, but it was not working very well. R21 stated she had not had a bowel movement in several days.
During interview on 1/22/25 at 2:37 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-B stated the night nurse runs a bowel movement report every night which indicated which residents did not have a bowel movement in a couple of days. RN-B stated if a resident is going on day three with no bowel movement, the facilities standing orders would be initiated which consisted of either as needed (PRN) Senna or MiraLAX. RN-B stated if a resident is going on day four with no bowel movement, the facilities standing orders would be initiated which consisted of PRN Dulcolax suppositories. RN-B stated R21 had scheduled senna and also had an order for one or two additional tablets PRN for constipation. RN-B confirmed R21's last bowel movement was on 1/16/24 at 7:43 p.m. RN-B stated R21 had not received any PRN medications since 1/16/24.
During interview on 1/22/25 at 2:56 p.m., nurse manager (NM) stated if a resident did not have a bowel movement in three days, an PRN medication would be offered. NM stated if the resident did not have an order for a PRN medication the provider would be contacted. NM stated if resident had not had a bowel movement in several days, she would expect nursing to listen to bowel sounds and to perform a rectal check if resident would allow. NM reviewed R21's record and confirmed R21's last bowel movement was on 1/16/25 and last PRN medication was administered on 1/16/25. NM stated the night nurse reviews the bowel information and gives that information to the day nurse to administer medications. NM stated R21 should have been offered PRN Senna and other PRN medications per the standing orders as she is at a higher risk for constipation due to R21 receiving pain medication. NM stated it was important to monitor and administer PRN medications, so the resident does not get bloated, does not get a new diagnosis and especially for the resident's comfort.
During interview on 1/24/25 at 2:35 p.m., director of nursing (DON) stated the aides chart resident's bowel movement in the point of care charting which relays that information to the nurses if it has been three days with no bowel movement. DON stated the nurse managers also oversees this. DON stated she would expect nursing to follow the protocol and offer PRN medications from the standing house orders which consisted of senna, MiraLAX, suppositories and/or edema. DON stated it was important so a resident does not get constipated and/or worse case scenario is they could end up with a small bowel obstruction.
The facility Bowel Management policy, dated 11/24, indicated the facility will ensure that residents experience adequate bowel elimination. Bowel records will be reviewed by nursing. Residents will be monitored for lack of sufficient bowel movement. Upon identification of constipation, the nurse will conduct a GI assessment, implement PRN medication and/or implement house standing orders, and monitor for effectiveness.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL's-dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and grooming) for 4 of 4 residents, ( R57, R...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL's-dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and grooming) for 4 of 4 residents, ( R57, R46, R16, R14) who were observed for assistance with eating.
Findings include:
R57:
R57's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of 12/15/24 identified that R57 was rarely/never understood and had severe cognitive impairment. R57's medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease/Dementia, anxiety disorder, metabolic encephalopathy (change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition), seizure disorder (a sudden change in behavior, movement or consciousness due to abnormal electrical activity in the brain)/epilepsy (a group of non-communicable neurological disorders characterized by recurrent seizures), malnutrition (imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), dehydration (a lack of total body water that disrupts metabolic processes ( set of life-sustaining chemical reactions in organisms), hyperosmolality ( a condition of high osmolarity in the body, often caused by increased sodium or glucose levels), hypernatremia (a high level of sodium in the blood), fatigue, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), contracture of the muscle of the upper arm, and failure to thrive. The MDS identified R57 is noted to have impaired functional movement of both arms and was totally dependent on staff for assistance with eating.
R57's care plan, revised on 12/27/24, indicated R57 was unable to communicate her needs. Additionally, the care plan indicated R57 had a communication problem r/t (related to) dementia and indicated R57 was nonverbal and was unable to communicate needs. The care plan directed staff to anticipate R57's needs. The care plan also indicated R57 had an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t impaired cognition from early onset Alzheimer's. The care plan directed staff to assist R57 to have clothing protector at meals, and directed staff to provide assistance with eating.
R46
R46's significant change MDS assessment of 11/12/24, identified R46 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated R46 had the following medical diagnoses: non-traumatic brain dysfunction (brain damage caused by factors other than external trauma), arthritis, Alzheimer's disease/Dementia, malnutrition, age related macular degeneration (a condition that affects the middle part of your vision, and weight loss. The MDS indicated there were no limitations in range of motion. The MDS identified R46 required partial/moderate assistance with eating-which is identified as the helper does less than half the effort.
R46's care plan, revised on 12/3/24, indicated R46 had a deficit with ADL performance related to rheumatoid arthritis (a type of arthritis where your immune system attacks the tissue lining the joints on both sides of your body. It may affect other parts of the body.), memory loss and dementia. Staff were directed to provide physical assistance to eat. The care plan also indicated R46 had a potential for communication problem related to dementia, memory loss, and trouble word finding. Staff were directed to allow adequate time to respond, repeat as necessary, and not rush client.
R16
R16's significant change MDS of 11/18/24 indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Her medical diagnoses included other neurological conditions, gastroesophageal reflux disease ( a condition in which stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into the tube connecting the mouth and stomach, called the esophagus), thyroid disorder (a problem when your thyroid is either too active, or not active enough, which affects your metabolism), dementia, Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time), malnutrition, metabolic encephalopathy, and a vitamin deficiency. R16 was noted to have bilateral (both sides) impairment in her upper extremities. The MDS indicated R16 required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, requiring assistance with more than half of the effort.
R16's care plan, revised on 8/12/24, identified R16 had a deficit in ADL performance related to weakness and impaired mobility from Parkinson's disease and directed staff to provide assist of one with eating, while staff encouraged resident to do what she was able to with eating. The care plan identified R16 had a communication problem r/t Parkinson's, slow processing verbal information and response, anxiety/behaviors, jerking movements at times and shaking of extremities. The care plan directed staff to allow adequate time to respond, repeat information as necessary, and instructed staff not to rush R16 as she attempted to communicate her needs and wishes.
R14
R14's quarterly MDS assessment of 11/12/24 indicated R14 had severe cognitive impairment. R14's medical diagnoses included: Alzheimer's Disease (neurological disorder which involves irreversible worsening changes in the ability to think and remember. It is the most common cause of dementia), dementia (the loss of the ability to reason, learn new skills, and plan and prioritize to the point which it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), malnutrition (imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), chronic pain, dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing). MDS indicated there was no functional impairment with range of motion and required supervision or touching assistance, providing verbal cues or touch steadying assistance as resident completes activity.
R14's care plan, revised 9/16/24, identified R14 had an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t multiple medical diagnoses which included osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease that can affect the many tissues of the joint), impaired cognition, glaucoma (an eye condition that damages the optic nerve which can lead to vision loss or blindness), The care plan directed staff R14 required assist of one staff members assistance staff to eat and was noted to eat slowly. The care plan identified R14 was able to communicate her needs and was able to hear with hearing aids.
On 1/22/25, at 8:11 a.m. R57 and R57's tablemate's (R14, R16, and R46) were observed to have received their morning breakfast. R57 was served breakfast tray at this time. All residents (R57, R46, R14, and R16 were observed seated at the same table. There were no staff available at the table to assist with meals which were just served. Additionally, there were only two staff members observed in the dining room at the neighboring table assisting other residents. R16 was observed to pick up the sausage patty as a whole piece and took a bite. R16 then placed the sausage on the plate, and did not continue eating.
While under constant observation, it was noted the staff had not arrived to provide any assistance to residents to eat.
On 1/22/25, at 8:23 a.m. the residents continue to be seated in the dining room, with the food placed in front of them. There were no requests made by R57, R56, R14, and R16 for assistance with eating. The meals observed in front of the residents included cooked cereal, pureed eggs, pureed French toast sticks, solid French toast sticks, and one resident was served a solid sausage patty.
On 1/22/25, at 8:27 a.m., 16 minutes after food was observed to be served, residents continued to sit at the table without assistance present. The food remained in front of the residents, uncovered.
On 1/22/25, 8:28 a.m., it was observed room trays were set up for delivery, however, there were no additional staff available in the dining room to feed residents seated at the table.
On 1/22/25, 8:31 a.m., registered nurses (RN)-C and RN-D arrived to aid residents R57, R56, R14, and R16 with their meals. This was 20 minutes after the initial service of the trays to these residents. RN's C & D proceeded to set up and begin to assist residents with meal without intervention due to length of time the food had been sitting out. A request was made by surveyor for trays to be temped due to the length of time food had been served, compared to the current time. The food was temped by the food production manager (FPM). Refer to citation 804 for further details.
On 1/22/25, at 8:36 a.m. after fresh trays were served to the residents by FPM, RN's C and D proceeded to assist two residents. Upon interview after serving the fresh trays, FPM stated it was important to have staff able to assist residents prior to food being served as this was a quality concern and could impact the quality of life. FPM stated being served cold food starts off the day bad. FPM stated it was the expectation staff would be available to assist residents prior to the food being served.
On 1/22/25, at 8:57 a.m. RN-C stated staff should be present to assist residents prior to service of the meals. RN-C stated residents should not be seated in front of their food without staff assistance.
On 1/22/25, at 10:47 a.m. RN-D stated it is important to have staff available to aid with feeding residents prior to service of meal. RN-D stated if there was a delay with assistance of meal after it was dished, it would not be hot, and this would not be flavorful. If the staff were not here, the food should not have been served.
On 1/22/25, at 12:04 p.m., Prep [NAME] (PC)-A stated the dietary staff are to serve the trays when the residents are seated at the table. PC-A stated she generally set up the residents who require assistance first. PC-A stated she served the residents requiring assistance, however, had not observed there were no staff available to assist the resident.
On 1/22/25, at 1:55 p.m. the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated it was her expectation that staff serve everyone at the table at the same time. If there were staff not available to assist the resident, the dietary staff should hold the plate until someone was able to assist them.
On 1/22/25, at 3:18 p.m. the director of quality improvement (DQI), identified there were concerns with the residents sitting at the table, with food in front of them, where they can smell, and not be able to eat. DQI stated while the residents waited, and the food had been served, and was sitting uncovered, the food was getting cold. DQI stated it was necessary to determine a better prioritization of services provided at that time which delayed service of breakfast.
On 1/22/25, at 3:24 p.m. clinical manager (CM)-A stated generally there were other staff members available to provide the residents assistance with the meal process. CM-A stated it did not go well this morning. CM-A expected dietary staff to wait until there were staff present before serving the meal. CM-A stated residents should not be served until staff are available to assist.
On 1/24/25, at 4:00 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated she expected meals would not be placed in front of residents until there were staff available to provide assistance.
A review of the facility policy, Assistance with Meals, dated February 2024, directed that facility staff will serve residents and will help residents who require assistance with eating. The policy further identified residents should receive the assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. The policy directed staff that residents who cannot feed themselves and need verbal cuing, or feeding assistance will be placed with staff for assistance, attention to safety, comfort, and dignity.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was held at a steady temperature of greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit for palatability, for 4 of 4 residents,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was held at a steady temperature of greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit for palatability, for 4 of 4 residents, ( R57, R46, R16, R14) observed during the dining process.
Findings include:
R57:
R57's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of 12/15/24 identified that R57 was rarely/never understood and had severe cognitive impairment. R57's medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease/Dementia, anxiety disorder, metabolic encephalopathy (change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition), seizure disorder (a sudden change in behavior, movement or consciousness due to abnormal electrical activity in the brain)/epilepsy (a group of non-communicable neurological disorders characterized by recurrent seizures), malnutrition (imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), dehydration (a lack of total body water that disrupts metabolic processes ( set of life-sustaining chemical reactions in organisms), hyperosmolality ( a condition of high osmolarity in the body, often caused by increased sodium or glucose levels), hypernatremia (a high level of sodium in the blood), fatigue, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), contracture of the muscle of the upper arm, and failure to thrive. The MDS identified R57 is noted to have impaired functional movement of both arms and was totally dependent on staff for assistance with eating.
R57's care plan, revised on 12/10/24, indicated R57 was unable to communicate her needs. R57's care plan directed staff to assist with eating. R57's care plan indicated R57 had potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) the diagnosis Alzheimer's, low BMI (Body Mass Index), and a Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) indicating malnutrition. R57 continued to meet GLIM (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Statement-a framework to guide malnutrition diagnosis) criteria for severe protein-calorie malnutrition r/t moderate fat loss and muscle loss, a BMI below 18.5, unintended weight loss, and low meal intakes. Staff were directed to provide/serve the diet as ordered and, provide and serve supplements as ordered.
R46
R46's significant change MDS assessment of 11/12/24, identified R46 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated R46 had the following medical diagnoses: non-traumatic brain dysfunction (brain damage caused by factors other than external trauma), arthritis, Alzheimer's disease/Dementia, malnutrition, age related macular degeneration (a condition that affects the middle part of your vision, and weight loss. The MDS indicated there were no limitations in range of motion. R46 was noted to require partial/moderate assistance-which is identified as the helper does less than half the effort. R46's care plan, revised on 12/3/24, indicated R46 had a deficit with ADL performance related to rheumatoid arthritis (a type of arthritis where your immune system attacks the tissue lining the joints on both sides of your body. It may affect other parts of the body.), memory loss and dementia. Staff were directed to provide with one assist to eat. The care plan also indicated R46 had a potential for communication problem related to dementia, memory loss, and trouble word finding. Staff were directed to allow adequate time to respond, repeat as necessary, and not rush client.
R46's care plan directed staff to provide diet as ordered. Staff were directed to consult with dietitian to seek a change in diet/textures if there were chewing/swallowing problems identified. In addition, the care plan, revised on 11/11/24, indicated the resident had the potential for altered nutritional status related to variable intake, dementia, with the MNA (mini nutritional screening-a screening to help identify elderly people who are malnourished) indicating malnourished status. The care plan identified R46 continued to meet GLIM criteria (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnuutrition-a screening for malnutrition based on clnical findings and cause) for moderate protein calorie malnutrition related to BMI below 22 for age over 70 and muscle loss in dorsal hand and clavicle regions. The care plan indicated a supplement appeared necessary as evidenced by decreased appetite. The care plan directed the Registered Dietitian (RD) to evaluate and make change recommendations as needed. Staff were directed to provide and serve supplements as ordered.
R16
R16's significant change MDS of 11/18/24 indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Her medical diagnoses included other neurological conditions, gastroesophageal reflux disease ( a condition in which stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into the tube connecting the mouth and stomach, called the esophagus), thyroid disorder (a problem when your thyroid is either too active, or not active enough, which affects your metabolism), dementia, Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time), malnutrition, metabolic encephalopathy, and a vitamin deficiency. R16 was noted to have bilateral (both sides) impairment in her upper extremities. The MDS indicated R16 required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, assistance with more than half of the effort.
R16's care plan, revised on 8/12/24, identified R16 had a deficit in ADL performance related to weakness and impaired mobility from Parkinson's disease and directed staff to provide assist of one with eating, while staff encouraged resident to do what she was able to with eating. The care plan identified R16 had a communication problem r/t Parkinson's, slow processing verbal information and response, anxiety/behaviors, jerking movements at times and shaking of extremities. The care plan directed staff to allow adequate time to respond, repeat information as necessary, and instructed staff not to rush R16 as she attempted to communicate her needs and wishes. R16's care plan also identified the resident had GERD. The care plan went on to identify resident had potential nutritional problems r/t inadequate energy and protein intake r/t acute illness AEB (as evidenced by) significant weight loss, history of mechanically altered diet, and needed assist to eat. The care plan identified the MNA indicating malnourished status, although indicated R16 did not meet GLIM criteria for protein-calorie malnutrition.
R14
R14's quarterly MDS assessment of 11/12/24 indicated R14 had severe cognitive impairment. R14s medical diagnoses included: Alzheimer's Disease (neurological disorder which involves irreversible worsening changes in the ability to think and remember. It is the most common cause of dementia), dementia (the loss of the ability to reason, learn new skills, and plan and prioritize to the point which it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), malnutrition (imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), chronic pain, dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing). MDS indicated there was no functional impairment with range of motion and required supervision or touching assistance, providing verbal cues or touching steadying assistance as resident completes activity.
R14's care plan, revised 9/16/24, identified R14 had an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t multiple medical diagnoses which included osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease that can affect the many tissues of the joint), impaired cognition, glaucoma (an eye condition that damages the optic nerve which can lead to vision loss or blindness), The care plan directed staff to R14 required assist of one staff members assistance staff to eat and was noted to eat slowly. The care plan identified R14 was able to communicate her needs and was able to hear with hearing aids. The care plan went on further to identify R14 had a potential nutritional problem d/t altered cognition/mood, diagnosis including CHF (congestive heart failure-potential for weight fluctuations), dysphagia with R14 need for assist/cueing needed at meals, Alzheimer's, advanced age.
On 1/22/25, at 8:11 a.m. R57 and R57's tablemate's (R14, R16, and R46) were observed to have received their morning breakfast. R57 was served breakfast tray at this time. All residents (R57, R46, R14, and R16 were observed seated at the same table. At this time, there were no staff available at the table to assist with meals which were served. Additionally, there were only two staff members observed in the dining room at the neighboring table assisting other residents. R16 was observed to pick up the sausage patty as a whole piece and took a bite. R16 then placed the sausage on the plate, and did not continue eating.
While under constant observation, it was noted the staff had not arrived to provide any assistance to residents to eat.
On 1/22/25, at 8:23 a.m. the residents continue to be seated in the dining room, with the food placed in front of them. There were no requests made by R57, R56, R14, and R16 for assistance with eating. The meals observed in front of the residents included cooked cereal, pureed eggs, pureed French toast sticks, solid French toast sticks, and sausage patty.
On 1/22/25, at 8:27 a.m., 16 minutes after food was observed to be served, residents continue to sit at the table without assistance present. The food remains placed in front of the residents, uncovered.
On 1/22/25, 8:28 a.m., it was observed room trays were set up for delivery, however, there were no additional staff available in the dining room to assist residents seated at the table.
On 1/22/25, 8:31 a.m., registered nurses (RN)-C and D arrived to aid residents with their meals. This was 20 minutes after the initial service of the trays. Once the staff were seated and prepared to begin meal service assistance, a request was made of food production manager, (FPM) , to perform a temperature check on the food items present at the table. The following temperatures were obtained at 8:33 a.m. (22 minutes after meals were observed to be served):
Cooked cereal: 123 degrees Fahrenheit
Pureed eggs: 103 degrees Fahrenheit
Scrambled eggs: 100 degrees Fahrenheit
French toast sticks (pureed): 107 degrees Fahrenheit
Oatmeal: 112 degrees Fahrenheit
Solid French Toast sticks: 76 degrees Fahrenheit
Ground sausage: 96 degrees Fahrenheit
Per FPM, the required temperature food is to be served at is 140 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperatures obtained, although not long enough to place a risk for food borne illness, would definitely affect the palatability of the food. The concern would be as to the quality of the food received. This would impact the quality of life. FPM went on to state cold food starts the day off bad. FPM stated it was the expectation that staff would be ready to assist residents before the food was served.
On 1/22/25, at 8:36 a.m. after fresh trays were served to the residents by FPM, RNs C & D proceeded to provide assistance to residents.
On 1/22/25, at 8:57 a.m. RN-C stated staff should be present to assist residents prior to service of the meals. RN-C stated if the food was sitting in front of the residents when the staff were not present to assist the food could be cold, and would need to be sent back to the kitchen.
On 1/22/25, at 10:47 a.m. RN-D stated it is important to have staff available to aid with feeding residents prior to service of meal. RN-D stated if there is a delay in service of meal after it is dished, it is not hot, and this was not flavorful. If the staff were not here, the food should not have been served.
On 1/22/25, at 12:04 p.m., Prep [NAME] (PC)-A stated the dietary staff are to serve the trays when the residents are seated at the table. PC-A stated she generally sets up the residents who require assistance first. PC-A stated she served the residents requiring assistance, however, had not observed there were no staff available to assist the resident.
On 1/22/25, at 1:55 p.m. the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated it was her expectation that staff serve everyone at the table at the same time. If there were staff not available to assist the resident, the dietary staff should hold the plate until someone was able to assist them.
On 1/22/25, at 3:18 p.m. the director of quality improvement (DQI), identified there were concerns with the residents sitting at the table, with food in front of them in, where they can smell,and not be able to eat. DQI stated the while the residents waited, and the food had been served, and was sitting uncovered, the food was getting cold. DQI stated it was necessary to determine a better prioritization of services provided at that time which delayed service of breakfast.
On 1/22/25, at 3:24 p.m. clinical manager (CM)-A stated it did not go well this morning. CM-A stated residents should not be served until staff are available to assist. CM-A stated the food sitting out may have been cold. CM-A stated it may not be that great.
On 1/24/25, at 4:00 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated it was her expectation that meals would not be placed in front of residents until there were staff available to provide assistance. Additionally, it would be her expectation that the food served would be provided for assistance at the required temperature.
A facility policy, Temperature and Time Requirements for Food, revised February 2024, identified: Guardian Angels Care Center utilizes the Minnesota Department of Health Food and Safety guidelines to ensure the proper and consistent monitoring, and temperature control of food. The document indicated Hot holding food was to be maintained at 135 degrees Fahrnheit or above.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to consistently track and monitor dishwasher temperatures for both the wash and rinse cycles, and take timely action to correct...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to consistently track and monitor dishwasher temperatures for both the wash and rinse cycles, and take timely action to correct the temperatures, for 1 of 1 dishwashers observed. This had the potential to affect all 108 current residents, as well as staff, who ate food served from dishes and tableware that were cleaned in the dishwasher.
Findings include:
On 1/21/25, at 9:32 a.m., during a brief initial tour with the interim culinary director (CD)-A and the certified dietary manager (CDM) an observation was made of completion of the dishwashing process. At that time, the temperatures for the morning cycle temperature check had not been logged. Dietary aide (DA)-B stated the wash temp was 150 degrees Fahrenheit, and the rinse temp was one hundred and eighty five-ish. DA-B stated the temperatures were to be 160 for wash, and 180 for the rinse cycle. Although able to state the desired temperatures for the wash and rinse cycle, DA-B stated she was unaware the temperatures were to be up to the desired temperatures before starting the dishwashing process and was unaware there were further interventions indicated if the machines did not reach the desired temperatures. CDM, who was present during the observation and interview, stated it appeared that staff were unaware of the need to run two or more racks through to bring the temperatures up to the desired temperatures prior to starting the dishwashing cycle, and instructed DA-B on this process. CDM stated if the dishwashing machine was not up to the required temperature when checked, the dishwasher would have to be run until the temp was up to the desired temp. If the temperature still did not get to the desired temp, the facility would have to reach out to the company and request a service call. CD stated if this could not be corrected, the facility would use the three section sink for cleaning of pots and pans, and implement use of Styrofoam plates.
On 1/22/25, at 1:52 p.m. during a follow up observation, DA-C was observed as they completed the dishwashing process. A review of the recorded temperatures indicated the temp check for the wash temperature was 175, while the rinse cycle was at 178 degrees Fahrenheit. DA-C stated they were unaware of the need to run the racks through until the temperature met the desired temperatures of 160 for the wash cycle and 180 for the rinse cycle. CD-A was present and provided instruction to DA-C.
A review of the dishwasher temps was completed for the period of 12/12/24 to 1/21/25. The facility documentation lacked logged results for the period of 1/1/25 through 1/7/25 (42 opportunities for documentation were missed).
A review of the wash temps were completed and noted the temp was less than 160 on the following dates:
12/12/24: AM: 148
12/13/24: AM: 150, Supper: 155
12/14/24: AM: 152, Supper: 151
12/15/24: Lunch: 150
12/17/24: AM: 150
12/18/24: AM: 152
12/19/24: Supper: 152
12/20/24: Lunch: 148, Supper: 149
12/21/24: AM: 150
12/23/24: AM: 148, Lunch: 151, Supper: 162
12/24/24: AM: 150, Lunch: 147
12/25/24: Lunch: 150
12/26/24: AM: 152, Lunch: 150, Supper: 153
12/27/24: AM:150, Supper: 159
12/29/24: AM: 150, Lunch:151
12/31/24: AM: 150, Supper: 153
1/9/26: Supper: 100
1/11/25: Supper: 100
1/12/25: Supper: 150
1/13/25: Supper: 140
1/14/25: Supper: 148
1/16/25: Supper:148
1/17/25: Supper:148
1/18/25: Supper: 148
1/19/25: Supper: 148
The wash temperature was below the desired range on 36 occassions during the period of 12/12/24 to 1/21/25.
The facility also lacked documentation for wash temperature checks on 27 opportunities during this period. This total, including the missing documentation for 1/1/25-1/7/25, would be 48 incidents when wash temperatures were not recorded.
A review of the rinse documentation was noted to be less than 180 on the following dates:
12/13/24: Supper: 160
12/18/24: Supper: 169
1/8/25: Supper: 170
1/9/25: Supper: 170
1/10/25: Supper:170
1/12/25: Supper: 160
1/16/25: Supper: 150
1/17/25: Supper: 150
1/18/25: Supper: 154
1/19/25: Supper: 152
The rinse temperature was below the desired range of 180 degrees Fahrenheit on 10 occasions during the period of 12/12/24 to 1/14/25.
The facility also lacked documentation for rinse temperature checks on 28 opportunities during this period. This total, including the missing documentation for 1/1/25-1/7/25, was 49 occasions where rinse temperatures were not recorded.
On 1/23/25, at 8:50 a.m. the service representative (SR) for the dishwasher was present for a service call. At this time, the wash and rinse temps were checked three times. SR stated the required temp for washing of dishes was 160 degrees. SR went on to state The final rinse temperature can be no lower than one hundred and eighty degrees. SR stated it was recommended to run the dishwashing racks through a couple of times to get the temperature up to the appropriate temperature. SR stated the water has to be that hot to kill the bacteria, and stated If not sanitized properly, technically you're not washing. SR stated the potential implication of not having the correct temperatures was if temperatures are not at the 180 degrees People can get sick. That's the whole point of sanitizing.
On 1/23/25, at 9:04 a.m. a review of the current logs was completed with CDM. CDM stated it appeared staff were not aware to run the dishwasher racks through the machine two or more times to get up to temperature. CDM stated the purpose of monitoring temperatures was to ensure the dishwasher was operating correctly to ensure that the dishes were cleaned and sanitized. CDM went on to state: If the dishes were not sanitized, and if the dishes were not clean, there was a risk, potential risk, for illness. CDM stated currently in the facility, she was aware of the presence of Covid and influenza, however, was unaware of any residents with Norovirus. CDM stated there were residents with Norovirus prior to January of 2025. CDM stated she was unaware of the length of time Norovirus could remain on dishes if not cleaned properly.
On 1/23/25, at 9:54 a.m., CD stated he was not aware of any residents who require special precautions at this time. CD stated dietary is notified by infection preventionist of any new illnesses and if they need to use paper products to eliminate cross contamination.
On 1/23/25, at 2:43 p.m., an email, dated 12/27/24 at 8:39 a.m., sent by the CD, was provided by the IP and administrator. The email stated In the event of instances like Norovirus that we have/had in the TCU, we would be using disposable items for meals wherever applicable. The email went on to state The [sic] reduces the amount of contact with items amongst the teams. As this surveyor had been told earlier by the CDM and CD there were no current cases which required disposable items, this was clarified with IP and administrator. The IP stated there was one case of Norovirus in the facility. IP stated use of disposable products was implemented when Norovirus was suspected. IP went on to state there were four total rooms where disposable dishes were being used. IP stated this was implemented upon suspicion of Norovirus. IP went on to state she was in contact with the CDM and CD and they were aware of people using paper products. Although paper products were used for those four residents as outlined by IP, the paper products were delivered on plastic trays which were washed through the communal dishwasher.
On 1/24/25, at 10:13 a.m., surveyor stopped at the receptionist desk for directions. At that time, surveyor observed a credit card scanner on the counter top, and asked it's function. The receptionist stated it was for employees to pay for their meals when they eat the facility food.
A facility policy, Dishwasher Temperature, undated, indicated the purpose of monitoring the dishwasher temperature was to ensure that proper infection control, cleaning and sanitizing of all dishware is achieved while using the automatic dish machine. The policy statement identified: The automatic dish machine will reach the appropriate temperature prior to washing and sanitizing to meet the guidelines.
The procedure outlined prior to washing the dishes, the dish machine will be turned on and run through the cycles to identify wash and rinse temperatures. The procedure identified the wash cycle will reach and minimum temperature of 160 degrees and rinse cycle will reach and maintain a minimum temperature of 180 degrees. The procedure identified the dish machine will be monitored at each meal period to ensure proper wash and rinse temperatures are reached. If the temperature was below the specified temperatures for the wash and rinse cycle, the Engineering department will be notified immediately. The procedure went on to state dishes will not be washed until the dish machine reaches the appropriate temperature. The procedure further goes on to identify If needed, disposable dishes will be used until the proper repairs can be made, and the three-compartment sink method will be used for pots and pans.
The policy lacked direction to staff to run multiple racks prior to starting the process to bring the cycles up to the desired rinse cycles prior to starting the dishwashing process. Additionally, the policy lacked instruction to the staff to record the temperatures obtained on the dishwasher temperature logs upon obtaining the temperatures.
The manufacturer manual from American Dish Service for Model ADC-44 High Temp Conveyor Dishmachines [sic], last revised 4/28/21, was received from the facility. The manual indicated the requirement at the dishmachine is 180 F (degrees Fahrenheit). The manual identified for high temp sanitizing, the measurement is taken at the manifold for a minimum of 180 F, not in or at the sprays. The manual indicated the temperature for hot water sanitizing in the wash cycle should be 160 F and 180 F for the rinse cycle for the hot water sanitizing.